Search

The COVID-19 pandemic and associated restrictions could adversely affect long-term HIV care. We evaluated the experiences of people receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART) through a decentralized delivery program in South Africa during the COVID-19 pandemic. We telephoned a random subsample of participants enrolled in a prospective cohort study in KwaZulu-Natal in April and May 2020 and administered a semi-structured telephone interview to consenting participants. We completed interviews with 303 of 638 contacted participants (47%); 66% were female, with median age 36y. The most common concerns regarding the COVID-19 pandemic were food running out (121, 40%), fear of becoming infected with COVID-19 (103, 34%), and being unable to work/losing employment or income (102, 34%). Twenty-five (8%) participants had delayed ART pick-up due to the pandemic, while 212 (70%) had new concerns about ART access going forward. Mental health scores were worse during the pandemic compared to baseline (median score 65.0 vs 80.0

We used the Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model to evaluate implementation of South Africa's Central Chronic Medicine Dispensing and Distribution (CCMDD) program, a differentiated service delivery program which allows clinically stable HIV-positive patients to receive antiretroviral therapy refills at clinic- or community-based pick-up points. Across ten clinics, we conducted 109 semi-structured interviews with stakeholders (pick-up point staff, CCMDD service providers and administrators) and 16 focus groups with 138 patients. Participants had highly favorable attitudes and said CCMDD decreased stigma concerns. Patient-level barriers included inadequate education about CCMDD and inability to get refills on designated dates. Organizational-level barriers included challenges with communication and transportation, errors in medication packaging and tracking, rigid CCMDD rules, and inadequate infrastructure. Recommendations included: (1) provide patient education and improve communication around refills (at the patient level); (2) provide dedicated space and staff, and ongoing training (at the organizational/clinic level); and (3) allow for prescription renewal at pick-up points and less frequent refills, and provide feedback to clinics (at the CCMDD program level).

Background South Africa faces a high burden of unmet contraceptive need, particularly among adolescent girls and young women. Providing contraception in community-based venues may overcome barriers to contraceptive access. Our objective was to explore the potential impact of the social environment and stylist–client interactions on perceived accessibility of contraceptives within hair salons. Methods We conducted 42 semi-structured, in-depth interviews with salon clients (100% identified as female, 100% identified as Black, median age 27.1 years) and 6 focus groups with 43 stylists (95% identified as female, 98% identified as Black, median age 29.6 years) in and around Umlazi Township, Durban, KwaZulu-Natal to explore perspectives on offering contraceptive services in hair salons. We used an inductive and deductive approach to generate the codebook, identified themes in the data, and then organized findings according to Rogers’ Individual Adoption Model as applied to community-based health prevention programs. Twenty-five percent of transcripts were coded by two independent coders to ensure reliability. Results We identified elements of the salon environment and stylist–client relationships as facilitators of and barriers to acceptability of salon-based contraceptive care. Factors that may facilitate perceived contraceptive accessibility in salons include: the anonymous, young, female-centered nature of salons; high trust and kinship within stylist–client interactions; and mutual investment of time. Stylists may further help clients build comprehension about contraceptives through training. Stylists and clients believe salon-based contraceptive delivery may be more accessible due to contraceptive need facilitating client buy-in for the program, as well as a salon environment in which clients may encourage other clients by voluntarily sharing their own contraceptive decisions. The non-judgmental nature of stylist–client relationships can empower clients to make contraceptive decisions, and stylists seek to support clients’ continued use of contraceptives through various adherence and support strategies. Some stylists and clients identified existing social barriers (e.g. confidentiality concerns) and made recommendations to strengthen potential contraceptive delivery in salons. Conclusion Stylists and clients were highly receptive to contraceptive delivery in salons and identified several social facilitators as well as barriers within this setting. Hair salons are community venues with a social environment that may uniquely mitigate barriers to contraceptive access in South Africa., Plain language summary Women in South Africa experience high rates of unintended pregnancies. Because of high HIV prevalence within the country, women who experience unplanned pregnancies may also be vulnerable to HIV. Studies have detailed the barriers women in South Africa face in accessing contraceptives, including poverty, cultural norms around contraceptive use, lack of confidential spaces, and negative experiences with healthcare workers. In response, we propose the provision of contraceptive and preventive HIV care in salons—places that may be more convenient, accessible, and comfortable for women to acquire contraceptives. In this analysis, we aimed to understand how the salon social environment and client–stylist relationships may lower barriers women face when accessing contraceptives, using a framework for how individuals adopt new interventions. We conducted in-depth interviews with 42 salon clients and six focus group discussions with 43 stylists and used content analysis to explore themes within the data. Overall, participants identified components of the salon environment and stylist–client relationships that may facilitate how clients learn and make decisions about contraceptive use. These included perceptions of: salons being anonymous and centered around young, female clients; and stylists and clients recognizing contraceptive need within the community, being invested in salon services, and building trusted relationships. Although overall buy-in was high, some stylists and clients also identified barriers such as confidentiality concerns, negative views on stylists, and discomfort with discussing contraceptives. Overall, our study identifies hair salons as promising spaces for women in South Africa to seek contraceptive care.

IntroductionLong-acting pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) options could overcome some barriers to oral PrEP persistence during pregnancy and postpartum. We evaluated long-acting PrEP preferences among oral PrEP-experienced pregnant and postpartum women in South Africa and Kenya, two countries with high coverage of oral PrEP and with pending regulatory approvals for long-acting injectable cabotegravir and the dapivirine vaginal ring (approved in South Africa, under review in Kenya).MethodsFrom September 2021 to February 2022, we surveyed pregnant and postpartum women enrolled in oral PrEP studies in South Africa and Kenya. We evaluated oral PrEP attitudes and preferences for existing and future long-acting PrEP methods.ResultsWe surveyed 190 women in South Africa (67% postpartum; median age 27 years [IQR 22-32]) and 204 women in Kenya (79% postpartum; median age 29 years [IQR 25-33]). 75% of participants reported oral PrEP use within the last 30 days. Overall, 49% of participants reported negative oral PrEP attributes, including side effects (21% South Africa, 30% Kenya) and pill burden (20% South Africa, 25% Kenya). Preferred PrEP attributes included long-acting method, effectiveness, safety while pregnant and breastfeeding, and free medication. Most participants (75%, South Africa and Kenya) preferred a potential long-acting injectable over oral PrEP, most frequently for longer duration of effectiveness in South Africa (87% South Africa, 42% Kenya) versus discretion in Kenya (5% South Africa, 49% Kenya). 87% of participants preferred oral PrEP over a potential long-acting vaginal ring, mostly due to concern about possible discomfort with vaginal insertion (82% South Africa, 48% Kenya). Significant predictors of long-acting PrEP preference included past use of injectable contraceptive (aOR 2.48, 95% CI: 1.34, 4.57), disliking at least one oral PrEP attribute (aOR 1.72, 95% CI: 1.05, 2.80), and preferring infrequent PrEP use (aOR 1.58, 95% CI: 0.94, 2.65).ConclusionsOral PrEP-experienced pregnant and postpartum women expressed a theoretical preference for long-acting injectable PrEP over other modalities, demonstrating potential acceptability among a key population who must be at the forefront of injectable PrEP rollout. Reasons for PrEP preferences differed by country, emphasizing the importance of increasing context-specific options and choice of PrEP modalities for pregnant and postpartum women.

We evaluated COVID-19 stigma and medical mistrust among people living with HIV in South Africa. We conducted telephone interviews with participants in a prospective study of a decentralized antiretroviral therapy program. Scales assessing medical mistrust, conspiracy beliefs, anticipated and internalized stigma, and stereotypes specific to COVID-19 were adapted primarily from the HIV literature, with higher scores indicating more stigma or mistrust. Among 303 participants, the median stigma summary score was 4 [interquartile range (IQR) 0–8; possible range 0–24] and 6 (IQR 2–9) for mistrust (possible range 0–28). A substantial proportion of participants agreed or strongly agreed with at least one item assessing stigma (54%) or mistrust (43%). Higher COVID-19 stigma was associated with female gender and antecedent HIV stigma, and lower stigma with reporting television as a source of information on COVID-19. Further efforts should focus on effects of stigma and mistrust on protective health behaviors and vaccine hesitancy.

Background People living with HIV (PLWH) may have a poorer prognosis with COVID-19 infection and are an important population for COVID-19 vaccination. We assessed the willingness and reasons for COVID-19 vaccine acceptance or hesitancy among PLWH in South Africa. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study consisting of telephone interviews with a randomly selected subset of participants enrolled in a prospective observational cohort study evaluating a decentralized antiretroviral therapy (ART) delivery program in South Africa. Questions assessed willingness to accept a future COVID-19 vaccine, concerns regarding COVID-19 vaccination, and overall vaccine confidence. Interviews were conducted between September 2020 and January 2021. We evaluated participant demographics, sources of COVID-19 information, stigma and medical mistrust, uptake of non-pharmaceutical interventions, and socioeconomic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic as potential covariates of willingness to accept vaccination. Results We completed interviews with 213 participants; 153 (72%) were female, median age 35y, and 100 (47%) had completed secondary school. Among the participants, 121 (57%) were willing to accept future vaccination, 46 (22%) were unsure, and 45 (21%) stated they did not intend to be vaccinated. Fear of side effects, reported by 42 (20%), was the most common concern about COVID-19 vaccination. Older age was associated with willingness to accept vaccination (aOR 1.75 for every 10-year increase in age, 95% CI 1.10–2.78, p = 0.02), while higher medical mistrust related to COVID-19 (aOR 0.21, 95% CI 0.093–0.45, p p = 0.02) were associated with lower willingness to accept vaccination. Conclusions In this cohort of PLWH in South Africa, over half were willing to accept COVID-19 vaccination, although a substantial proportion remained unsure or were not willing to be vaccinated. Public health messaging should emphasize the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccination and address misinformation and medical mistrust among PLWH. Ongoing efforts to ensure access to COVID-19 vaccines for vulnerable populations are crucial.

Introduction South Africa's government‐led Central Chronic Medication Dispensing and Distribution (CCMDD) program offers people living with HIV the option to collect antiretroviral therapy at their choice of community‐ or clinic‐based pick‐up points intended to increase convenience and decongest clinics. To understand CCMDD pick‐up point use among people living with HIV, we evaluated factors associated with uptake of a community‐ versus clinic‐based pick‐up point at CCMDD enrolment. Methods We collected baseline data from October 2018 to March 2020 on adults (≥18 years) who met CCMDD clinical eligibility criteria (non‐pregnant, on antiretroviral therapy for ≥1 year and virologically suppressed) as part of an observational cohort in seven public clinics in KwaZulu‐Natal. We identified factors associated with community‐based pick‐up point uptake and fit a multivariable logistic regression model, including age, gender, employment status, self‐perceived barriers to care, self‐efficacy, HIV‐related discrimination, and perceived benefits and challenges of CCMDD. Results and Discussion Among 1521 participants, 67% were females, with median age 36 years (IQR 30–44). Uptake of a community‐based pick‐up point was associated with younger age (aOR 1.18 per 10‐year decrease, 95% CI 1.05–1.33), being employed ≥40 hours per week (aOR 1.42, 95% CI 1.10–1.83) versus being unemployed, no self‐perceived barriers to care (aOR 1.42, 95% CI 1.09–1.86) and scoring between 36 and 39 (aOR 1.44, 95% CI 1.03–2.01) or 40 (aOR 1.91, 95% CI 1.39–2.63) versus 10–35 on the self‐efficacy scale, where higher scores indicate greater self‐efficacy. Additional factors included more convenient pick‐up point location (aOR 2.32, 95% CI 1.77–3.04) or hours (aOR 5.09, 95% CI 3.71–6.98) as perceived benefits of CCMDD, and lack of in‐clinic follow‐up after a missed collection date as a perceived challenge of CCMDD (aOR 4.37, 95% CI 2.30–8.31). Conclusions Uptake of community‐based pick‐up was associated with younger age, full‐time employment, and systemic and structural factors of living with HIV (no self‐perceived barriers to care and high self‐efficacy), as well as perceptions of CCMDD (convenient pick‐up point location and hours, lack of in‐clinic follow‐up). Strategies to facilitate community‐based pick‐up point uptake should be tailored to patients’ age, employment, self‐perceived barriers to care and self‐efficacy to maximize the impact of CCMDD in decongesting clinics.