Search

Background: No reports about factors that predict prognosis after second-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer have been published., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 124 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who received irinotecan-based second-line chemotherapy after first-line folinic acid/5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) with or without bevacizumab., Results: A multivariate Cox model revealed 5 prognostic factors for worse survival: ECOG performance status 2, pathologically poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma, peritoneal metastasis, progression-free survival of first-line FOLFOX < 6 months, and lactate dehydrogenase ≥ 400 IU/L. When patients were categorized into 3 risk groups-patients without any prognostic factors (low-risk, n = 55), patients with one prognostic factor (intermediate-risk, n = 32), and patients with 2 or more prognostic factors (high-risk, n = 37)-overall survival from initiation of second-line chemotherapy was 23.5, 14.6, and 5.5 months, respectively. The proportion of patients who were eligible to receive further chemotherapy after disease progression was significantly lower in the high-risk group (41%) than in the intermediate- (67%) and low-risk (95%) groups., Conclusion: Several prognostic factors for survival after second-line therapy and probability of receiving third-line chemotherapy were identified. This risk classification system might be useful for determining which patients should receive cetuximab in the second-line setting rather than the third-line setting.

Background/aims: To clarify the efficacy and toxicity of cisplatin, epirubicin, and continuous infusion of 5-FU (CEF therapy) in patients with advanced intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma (ICC)., Methodology: Chemo-naïve patients with advanced ICC were treated with cisplatin at 80 mg/m2 and epirubicin at 50 mg/m2 on day 1, and continuous infusion of 5-FU at 500 mg/m2/day on days 1 through 5. If there was no evidence of tumor progression or unacceptable toxicity, the treatment was repeated every 4 weeks, up to a maximum of 6 courses., Results: Thirty-nine patients were enrolled in this study. The median number of courses was 2 (range, 1-6). A partial response was obtained in 4 patients (10%) with a median duration of 2.3 months. Twenty-seven patients (69%) showed no change, and 7 patients (18%) had progressive disease. The median survival time was 9.1 months and the 1-year survival rate was 23%. The progression-free survival time was 5.1 months. Grade 3 to 4 adverse effects were leukocytopenia (51%), neutropenia (74%), thrombocytopenia (23%), and nausea/vomiting (10%). Most of the toxicities were reversible, but 2 patients died of neutropenic sepsis., Conclusions: CEF therapy has marginal antitumor activity against advanced ICC, although hematological toxicity is the major and most frequent toxicity.

There are a variety of tumor markers used for diagnosis of pancreatic and biliary tract cancer including carbohydrate antigens such as CA19-9, DUPAN-2, CA50 and Span-1, the carcinoembryonic antigen and pancreatic enzymes such as elastase 1. The tumor marker kinetics in serum help to predict survival in patients receiving surgical and/or non-surgical treatment. Since each of those tumor markers remains at a low sensitivity and specificity in the early stage, none are useful for detecting early cancer. In spite of the development of various diagnostic techniques, pancreas and biliary tract cancer is usually diagnosed at an incurable stage, and the 5-year survival rate is extremely low. Therefore, improvements in survival may well result from screening for early-stage pancreatic and biliary cancer. The development of tumor markers with higher sensitivity and specificity should have the highest priority.