Search

Simple Summary: Most gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are driven by activating mutations in KIT and PDGFRA or alterations in the succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) complex. A small fraction of GISTs lack alterations in KIT, PDGFRA, and the SDH complex, so-called "triple-negative" GISTs. We assessed clinical genomic sequencing, treatment, and survival outcomes in a cohort of 20 triple-negative GISTs. Genomic alterations were most commonly seen in the RAS/RAF/MAPK pathway and the DNA damage response pathway. Compared to KIT/PDGFRA mutant GIST, limited benefit was observed with imatinib in triple-negative GIST. In-depth molecular profiling can be helpful in identifying driver mutations and guiding therapy. Objective: The vast majority of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are driven by activating mutations in KIT, PDGFRA, or components of the succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) complex (SDHA, SDHB, SDHC, and SDHD genes). A small fraction of GISTs lack alterations in KIT, PDGFRA, and SDH. We aimed to further characterize the clinical and genomic characteristics of these so-called "triple-negative" GISTs. Methods: We extracted clinical and genomic data from patients seen at MD Anderson Cancer Center with a diagnosis of GIST and available clinical next generation sequencing data to identify "triple-negative" patients. Results: Of the 20 patients identified, 11 (55.0%) had gastric, 8 (40.0%) had small intestinal, and 1 (5.0%) had rectal primary sites. In total, 18 patients (90.0%) eventually developed recurrent or metastatic disease, and 8 of these presented with de novo metastatic disease. For the 13 patients with evaluable response to imatinib (e.g., neoadjuvant treatment or for recurrent/metastatic disease), the median PFS with imatinib was 4.4 months (range 0.5–191.8 months). Outcomes varied widely, as some patients rapidly developed progressive disease while others had more indolent disease. Regarding potential genomic drivers, four patients were found to have alterations in the RAS/RAF/MAPK pathway: two with a BRAF V600E mutation and two with NF1 loss-of-function (LOF) mutations (one deletion and one splice site mutation). In addition, we identified two with TP53 LOF mutations, one with NTRK3 fusion (ETV6-NTRK3), one with PTEN deletion, one with FGFR1 gain-of-function (GOF) mutation (K654E), one with CHEK2 LOF mutation (T367fs*), one with Aurora kinase A fusion (AURKA-CSTF1), and one with FANCA deletion. Patients had better responses with molecularly targeted therapies than with imatinib. Conclusions: Triple-negative GISTs comprise a diverse cohort with different driver mutations. Compared to KIT/PDGFRA-mutant GIST, limited benefit was observed with imatinib in triple-negative GIST. In depth molecular profiling can be helpful in identifying driver mutations and guiding therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Leiomyosarcoma is a subtype of soft tissue sarcoma with poor outcomes and response to currently available treatments. The goal of this review is to assess the current landscape of targeted therapies and explore how our current understanding of the biology of leiomyosarcoma may inform the development of new targeted therapies to improve the treatment of leiomyosarcoma. Leiomyosarcoma (LMS) is an aggressive subtype of soft tissue sarcoma that arises from smooth muscle cells, most commonly in the uterus and retroperitoneum. LMS is a heterogeneous disease with diverse clinical and molecular characteristics that have yet to be fully understood. Molecular profiling has uncovered possible targets amenable to treatment, though this has yet to translate into approved targeted therapies in LMS. This review will explore historic and recent findings from molecular profiling, highlight promising avenues of current investigation, and suggest possible future strategies to move toward the goal of molecularly matched treatment of LMS. We focus on targeting the DNA damage response, the macrophage-rich micro-environment, the PI3K/mTOR pathway, epigenetic regulators, and telomere biology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Ripretinib, with reported broad activity against KIT-mutated gastrointestinal stomal tumors (GISTs), has been approved in the fourth-line setting, while avapritinib, which has robust activity against PDGFRA D842V and KIT activation loop (AL) mutations, has been approved for tumors with PDGFRA exon 18 mutations in any line of treatment. Avapritinib has fair activity against tumors with KIT exon 17 AL mutations or primary exon 9 mutations, as reported in the NAVIGATOR trial. That finding led to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines' inclusion of avapritinib as an available option after progression of disease on other FDA-approved tyrosine kinase inhibitors. As ripretinib and avapritinib have shown overlapping activity against KIT secondary mutations, we investigated whether the benefit of trying one of these drugs remains after exposure to the other. This study reports no significant difference in efficacy of these drugs regarding the sequence in which they were administered to the patient. Ripretinib and avapritinib have demonstrated activity in the late-line treatment of gastrointestinal stomal tumors (GISTs). We investigated whether patients previously treated with ripretinib benefit from avapritinib, and vice versa. Patients diagnosed with metastatic/unresectable GIST and treated with both drugs at two institutions in 2000–2021 were included. Patients were grouped by drug sequence: ripretinib–avapritinib (RA) or avapritinib–ripretinib (AR). Radiographic response was evaluated using RECIST 1.1. Kaplan–Meier and log-rank tests were used to compare time-to-progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS). Thirty-four patients (17 per group) were identified, with a median age of 48 years. The most common primary site was the small bowel (17/34, 50%), followed by the stomach (10/34, 29.4%). Baseline characteristics and tumor mutations were not significantly different between groups. Response rates (RRs) for ripretinib were 18% for RA and 12% for AR; RRs for avapritinib were 12% for AR and 18% for RA. Median TTPs for ripretinib were 3.65 months (95%CI 2–5.95) for RA and 4.73 months (1.87–15.84) for AR. Median TTPs for avapritinib were 5.39 months (2.86–18.99) for AR and 4.11 months (1.91–11.4) for RA. Median OS rates following RA or AR initiation were 29.63 (95%CI 13.8–50.53) and 33.7 (20.03–50.57) months, respectively. Both ripretinib and avapritinib were efficacious in the late-line treatment of GIST, with no evidence that efficacy depended on sequencing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cells encounter oxygen deprivation (hypoxia) in various physiological and pathological contexts. Adaptation to hypoxic stress occurs in part by suppressing MYC, a key regulator of cellular metabolism, proliferation, and survival. Hypoxia has been reported to inhibit MYC through multiple means, including disruption of MYC transcriptional complexes and decreased MYC protein abundance. Here we identify enhanced proteasomal degradation and cathepsin-mediated proteolysis as important mechanisms for hypoxic MYC inhibition in human colon carcinoma cells. MYC protein levels were similarly reduced in hypoxic primary keratinocytes. Increased MYC turnover at low O2 tension was dependent on the E3 ubiquitin ligases FBXW7 and DDB1, as well as hypoxic induction of cathepsins D and S. Reduced MYC protein levels coincided with hypoxic inhibition of RNA polymerase III-dependent MYC target genes, which MYC regulates independently of its binding partner MAX. Finally, MYC overexression in hypoxic cells promoted cell cycle progression but also enhanced cell death via increased expression of the proapop-totic genes NOXA and PUMA. Collectively, these results indicate that hypoxic cells promote MYC degradation as an adaptive strategy to reduce proliferation, suppress biosynthetic processes, and promote cell survival under low O2 tension. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs) are master regulators of the transcriptional response to low oxygen and play essential roles in embryonic development, tissue homeostasis, and disease. Recent studies have demonstrated that hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) within the bone marrow localize to a hypoxic niche and that HIF-1α promotes HSC adaptation to stress. Because the related factor HIF-2α is also expressed in HSCs, the combined role of HIF-1α and HIF-2α in HSC maintenance is unclear. To this end, we have conditionally deleted the HIF-α dimerization partner, the aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator (ARNT) in the hematopoietic system to ablate activity of both HIF-1α and HIF-2α and assessed the functional consequence of ARNT deficiency on fetal liver and adult hematopoiesis. We determined that ARNT is essential for adult and fetal HSC viability and homeostasis. Importantly, conditional knockout of both Hif-1α and Hif-2α phenocopied key aspects of these HSC phenotypes, demonstrating that the impact of Arnt deletion is primarily HIF dependent. ARNT-deficient long-term HSCs underwent apoptosis, potentially because of reduced B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2) and vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) expression. Our results suggest that HIF activity may regulate HSC homeostasis through these prosurvival factors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]