Search

In recent years, there has been increased focus on exploring the role the non-protein-coding genome plays in Mendelian disorders. One class of particular interest is long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), which has recently been implicated in the regulation of diverse molecular processes. However, because lncRNAs do not encode protein, there is uncertainty regarding what constitutes a pathogenic lncRNA variant, and thus annotating such elements is challenging. The Developmental Genome Anatomy Project (DGAP) and similar projects recruit individuals with apparently balanced chromosomal abnormalities (BCAs) that disrupt or dysregulate genes in order to annotate the human genome. We hypothesized that rearrangements disrupting lncRNAs could be the underlying genetic etiology for the phenotypes of a subset of these individuals. Thus, we assessed 279 cases with BCAs and selected 191 cases with simple BCAs (breakpoints at only two genomic locations) for further analysis of lncRNA disruptions. From these, we identified 66 cases in which the chromosomal rearrangements directly disrupt lncRNAs. In 30 cases, no genes of any other class aside from lncRNAs are directly disrupted, consistent with the hypothesis that lncRNA disruptions could underly the phenotypes of these individuals. Strikingly, the lncRNAs MEF2C-AS1 and ENSG00000257522 are each disrupted in two unrelated cases. Furthermore, we experimentally tested the lncRNAs TBX2-AS1 and MEF2C-AS1 and found that knockdown of these lncRNAs resulted in decreased expression of the neighboring transcription factors TBX2 and MEF2C, respectively. To showcase the power of this genomic approach for annotating lncRNAs, here we focus on clinical reports and genetic analysis of seven individuals with likely developmental etiologies due to lncRNA disruptions., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

In recent years, there has been increased focus on exploring the role the non-protein-coding genome plays in Mendelian disorders. One class of particular interest is long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), which has recently been implicated in the regulation of diverse molecular processes. However, because lncRNAs do not encode protein, there is uncertainty regarding what constitutes a pathogenic lncRNA variant, and thus annotating such elements is challenging. The Developmental Genome Anatomy Project (DGAP) and similar projects recruit individuals with apparently balanced chromosomal abnormalities (BCAs) that disrupt or dysregulate genes in order to annotate the human genome. We hypothesized that rearrangements disrupting lncRNAs could be the underlying genetic etiology for the phenotypes of a subset of these individuals. Thus, we assessed 279 cases with BCAs and selected 191 cases with simple BCAs (breakpoints at only two genomic locations) for further analysis of lncRNA disruptions. From these, we identified 66 cases in which the chromosomal rearrangements directly disrupt lncRNAs. Strikingly, the lncRNAs MEF2C-AS1 and ENSG00000257522 are each disrupted in two unrelated cases. Furthermore, in 30 cases, no genes of any other class aside from lncRNAs are directly disrupted, consistent with the hypothesis that lncRNA disruptions could underly the phenotypes of these individuals. To showcase the power of this genomic approach for annotating lncRNAs, here we focus on clinical reports and genetic analysis of two individuals with BCAs and additionally highlight six individuals with likely developmental etiologies due to lncRNA disruptions.

Novel cytogenetic tools are increasingly based on genome sequencing for detecting chromosomal abnormalities. Different sequence-based techniques optimized for diagnosis of structural variants can be useful for narrowing down the localization of breakpoints of chromosomal abnormalities, but do not offer nucleotide resolution of breakpoints for proper interpretation of gene disruption. This protocol presents the characterization of structural variants at nucleotide resolution using Sanger sequencing after low-pass large-insert genome sequencing or other long-molecule methods. © 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Primer design for junction amplification at translocations and inversions Basic Protocol 2: Amplification of derivative chromosomes using a long-range polymerase Alternate Protocol: Amplification of derivative chromosomes using a hot-start polymerase Basic Protocol 3: Preparation of DNA for Sanger sequencing Basic Protocol 4: Interpretation and reporting of breakpoints based on Sanger sequencing., (© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)