Search

Despite curative hepatectomy, most colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) patients relapse locally within 2 years. Genomic predictors for hepatic recurrence are poorly understood. This study was designed to identify genomic signatures for recurrence in resected CRLM patients treated with adjuvant hepatic artery infusion (HAI) and/or systemic (SYS) chemotherapy.Patients undergoing curative hepatectomy and adjuvant HAI+SYS or SYS between January 2000 and October 2017 with next-generation sequencing data were catalogued. Gene and signaling-level alterations were checked for association with time to any (AR), liver (LR), and extrahepatic recurrence (ER) by using Kaplan-Meier analysis.Of 172 receiving HAI+SYS, 100 patients recurred, with 69 LR and 83 ER. Five- and ten-year LR-free rates were 57% (95% confidence interval [CI] 48-65%) and 51% (95% CI 41-60%), respectively. Five- and 10-year ER-free, rates were 51% (95% CI 43-58%) and 45% (95% CI 36-54%), respectively. More ER was observed with tumors harboring altered KRAS (38% [95% CI 25-50%] vs. 63% [95% CI 53-71%], p-adj = 0.003) and RAS/RAF (36% [95% CI 25-48%] vs. 66% [95% CI 56-74%], p-adj 0.001) than wild-type. Co-altered RAS/RAF-TP53 was associated with worse AR (26% [95% CI 14-40%] vs. 48% [95% CI 39-57%], p-unadj 0.001), ER (30% [95% CI 17-45%] vs. 62% [95% CI 53-70%], p-unadj 0.001), and LR rate (40% [95% CI 24-57%] vs. 70% [95% CI 60-77%], p-unadj = 0.002). On multivariable analysis, controlling for clinical risk score, ablation, margin status, and primary T-stage, co-altered RAS/RAF-TP53 was associated with increased risk for AR (HR = 2.14, 95% CI 1.38-3.31, p-unadj 0.001), LR (HR = 1.79, 95% CI 1.06-3.02, p-unadj = 0.029), and ER (HR = 2.81, 95% CI 1.78-4.44, p-unadj 0.001).Altered KRAS, RAS/RAF, and RAS/RAF-TP53 associated with earlier local and distant recurrence in resected CRLM patients receiving adjuvant HAI+SYS. Co-altered RAS/RAF-TP53 was a novel predictor of LR warranting investigation of whether genomic cooperativity is associated with this relapsing phenotype. Systemic therapies tailored to high-risk tumor biology are needed to reduce distant relapse after hepatectomy.

Background: The aim of this study was to develop a prediction model for 10-year overall survival (OS) after resection of colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) based on patient, tumour and treatment characteristics. Methods: Consecutive patients after complete resection of CRLM were included from two centres (1992-2019). A prediction model providing 10-year OS probabilities was developed using Cox regression analysis, including KRAS, BRAF and histopathological growth patterns. Discrimination and calibration were assessed using cross-validation. A web-based calculator was built to predict individual 10-year OS probabilities. Results: A total of 4112 patients were included. The estimated 10-year OS was 30% (95% CI 29 -32). Fifteen patient, tumour and treatment characteristics were independent prognostic factors for 10-year OS; age, gender, location and nodal status of the primary tumour, disease-free interval, number and diameter of CRLM, preoperative CEA, resection margin, extrahepatic disease, KRAS and BRAF mutation status, histopathological growth patterns, perioperative systemic chemotherapy and hepatic arterial infusion pump chemotherapy. The discrimination at 10-years was 0.73 for both centres. A simplified risk score identified four risk groups with a 10-year OS of 57%, 38%, 24%, and 12%. Conclusions: Ten-year OS after resection of CRLM is best predicted with a model including 15 patient, tumour, and treatment characteristics. The web-based calculator can be used to inform patients. This model serves as a benchmark to determine the prognostic value of novel biomarkers. (C) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Supplemental Table 1: Clinical Characteristics, Treatment, and Recurrence Rates of of Patients with Stage II SBA Supplemental Table 2. Germline variants among SBA patients

Molecular predictors of progression free survival in patients treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy

Purpose:Lymph node metastasis (LNM) drastically reduces survival after resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHC). Optimal treatment is ill defined, and it is unclear whether tumor mutational profiling can support treatment decisions.Experimental Design:Patients with liver-limited IHC with or without LNM treated with resection (N = 237), hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC; N = 196), or systemic chemotherapy alone (SYS; N = 140) at our institution between 2000 and 2018 were included. Genomic sequencing was analyzed to determine whether genetic alterations could stratify outcomes for patients with LNM.Results:For node-negative patients, resection was associated with the longest median overall survival [OS, 59.9 months; 95% confidence interval (CI), 47.2–74.31], followed by HAIC (24.9 months; 95% CI, 20.3–29.6), and SYS (13.7 months; 95% CI, 8.9–15.9; P < 0.001). There was no difference in survival for node-positive patients treated with resection (median OS, 19.7 months; 95% CI, 12.1–27.2) or HAIC (18.1 months; 95% CI, 14.1–26.6; P = 0.560); however, survival in both groups was greater than SYS (11.2 months; 95% CI, 14.1–26.6; P = 0.024). Node-positive patients with at least one high-risk genetic alteration (TP53 mutation, KRAS mutation, CDKN2A/B deletion) had worse survival compared to wild-type patients (median OS, 12.1 months; 95% CI, 5.7–21.5; P = 0.002), regardless of treatment. Conversely, there was no difference in survival for node-positive patients with IDH1/2 mutations compared to wild-type patients.Conclusions:There was no difference in OS for patients with node-positive IHC treated by resection versus HAIC, and both treatments had better survival than SYS alone. The presence of high-risk genetic alterations provides valuable prognostic information that may help guide treatment.

Overall survival from diagnosis with advanced disease by KRAS, ERBB2 and CDKN2A/B status

Distribution of colorectal cancer cases according to SMAD4 expression status and immune response to the tumor in validation cohort

Kaplan-Meier graphs in the validation cohort with number of subjects at risk showing colorectal cancer-specific survival according to SMAD4 status.

Kaplan-Meier graphs with number of subjects at risk comparing recurrence-free survival (RFS) by (a) TIL status, or (b) PLA status, with arrows indicating patients whose tumors were also SMAD4 loss.

Clinical, pathological, and molecular characteristics of colorectal cancer cases according to SMAD4 expression status in validation cohort

Supplementary Methods, References, and Figures

Genomic and clinical information of MSKCC validation cohort (n=935) with corresponding data dictionary

Ordinal logistic regression analyses to assess the association of SMAD4 expression status with lymphocytic reaction patterns in validation cohort

Supplementary Data (Figures in separate files)

Purpose:The prevalence and clinical characteristics of small bowel adenocarcinomas (SBA) in the setting of Lynch syndrome have not been well studied. We characterized SBA according to DNA mismatch repair and/or microsatellite instability (MMR/MSI) and germline mutation status and compared clinical outcomes.Experimental Design:A single-institution review identified 100 SBAs. Tumors were evaluated for MSI via MSIsensor and/or corresponding MMR protein expression via IHC staining. Germline DNA was analyzed for mutations in known cancer predisposition genes, including MMR (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, and EPCAM). Clinical variables were correlated with MMR/MSI status.Results:Twenty-six percent (26/100; 95% confidence interval, 18.4–35.4) of SBAs exhibited MMR deficiency (MMR-D). Lynch syndrome prevalence was 10% overall and 38.5% among MMR-D SBAs. Median age at SBA diagnosis was similar in non-Lynch syndrome MMR-D versus MMR-proficient (MMR-P) SBAs (65 vs. 61; P = 0.75), but significantly younger in Lynch syndrome (47.5 vs. 61; P = 0.03). The prevalence of synchronous/metachronous cancers was 9% (6/67) in MMR-P versus 34.6% (9/26) in MMR-D SBA, with 66.7% (6/9) of these in Lynch syndrome (P = 0.0002). In the MMR-P group, 52.2% (35/67) of patients presented with metastatic disease, compared with 23.1% (6/26) in the MMR-D group (P = 0.008). In MMR-P stage I/II patients, 88.2% (15/17) recurred, compared with 18.2% (2/11) in the MMR-D group (P = 0.0002).Conclusions:When compared with MMR-P SBA, MMR-D SBA was associated with earlier stage disease and lower recurrence rates, similar to observations in colorectal cancer. With a 38.5% prevalence in MMR-D SBA, germline Lynch syndrome testing in MMR-D SBA is warranted.

Figure S3

Purpose:SMAD4 has shown promise in identifying patients with colorectal cancer at high risk of recurrence or death.Experimental Design: A discovery cohort and independent validation cohort were classified by SMAD4 status. SMAD4 status and immune infiltrate measurements were tested for association with recurrence-free survival (RFS). Patient-derived xenografts from SMAD4-deficient and SMAD4-retained tumors were used to examine chemoresistance.Results:The discovery cohort consisted of 364 patients with stage I–IV colorectal cancer. Median age at diagnosis was 53 years. The cohort consisted of 61% left-sided tumors and 62% stage II/III patients. Median follow-up was 5.4 years (interquartile range, 2.3–8.2). SMAD4 loss, noted in 13% of tumors, was associated with higher tumor and nodal stage, adjuvant therapy use, fewer tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL), and lower peritumoral lymphocyte aggregate (PLA) scores (all P < 0.04). SMAD4 loss was associated with worse RFS (P = 0.02). When stratified by SMAD4 and immune infiltrate status, patients with SMAD4 loss and low TIL or PLA had worse RFS (P = 0.002 and P = 0.006, respectively). Among patients receiving 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based systemic chemotherapy, those with SMAD4 loss had a median RFS of 3.8 years compared with 13 years for patients with SMAD4 retained. In xenografted mice, the SMAD4-lost tumors displayed resistance to 5-FU. An independent cohort replicated our findings, in particular, the association of SMAD4 loss with decreased immune infiltrate, as well as worse disease-specific survival.Conclusions:Our data show SMAD4 loss correlates with worse clinical outcome, resistance to chemotherapy, and decreased immune infiltrate, supporting its use as a prognostic marker in patients with colorectal cancer.

Kaplan-Meier graph with number of subjects at risk comparing (a) SMAD4, (b) TIL, and (c) PLA status, separately, as well as (d) SMAD4 and TIL, and (e) SMAD4 and PLA, together, with recurrence-free survival (RFS) among only the MMR-proficient patients.

Purpose:We aimed to investigate genomic correlates underlying extremes of survivorship in metastatic colorectal cancer and their applicability in informing survival in distinct subsets of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.Experimental Design:We examined differences in oncogenic somatic alterations between metastatic colorectal cancer cohorts demonstrating extremes of survivorship following complete metastasectomy: ≤2-year (n = 17) and ≥10-year (n = 18) survivors. Relevant genomic findings, and their association with overall survival (OS), were validated in two independent datasets of 935 stage IV and 443 resected stage I–IV patients.Results:In the extremes-of-survivorship cohort, significant co-occurrence of KRAS hotspot mutations and TP53 alterations was observed in ≤2-year survivors (P < 0.001). When validating these findings in the independent cohort of 935 stage IV patients, incorporation of the cumulative effect of any oncogenic Ras/B-raf (i.e., either KRAS, NRAS, or BRAF) and TP53 alteration generated three prognostic clusters: (i) TP53-altered alone (median OS, 132 months); (ii) Ras/B-raf–altered alone (65 months) or Ras/B-raf- and TP53 pan-wild-type (60 months); and (iii) coaltered Ras/B-raf–TP53 (40 months; P < 0.0001). Coaltered Ras/B-raf–TP53 was independently associated with mortality (HR, 2.47; 95% confidence interval, 1.91–3.21; P < 0.001). This molecular profile predicted survival in the second independent cohort of 443 resected stage I–IV patients. Coaltered Ras/B-raf–TP53 was associated with worse OS in patients with liver (n = 490) and lung (n = 172) but not peritoneal surface (n = 149) metastases. Moreover, coaltered Ras/B-raf–TP53 tumors were significantly more likely to involve extrahepatic metastatic sites with limited salvage options.Conclusions:Genomic analysis of extremes of survivorship following colorectal cancer metastasectomy identifies a prognostic role for coaltered Ras/B-raf–TP53 and its association with distinct patterns of colorectal cancer metastasis.

Supplementary Figures 1 - 3

Purpose: Various genetic driver aberrations have been identified among distinct anatomic and clinical subtypes of intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and these molecular alterations may be prognostic biomarkers and/or predictive of drug response.Experimental Design: Tumor samples from patients with cholangiocarcinoma who consented prospectively were analyzed using the MSK-IMPACT platform, a targeted next-generation sequencing assay that analyzes all exons and selected introns of 410 cancer-associated genes. Fisher exact tests were performed to identify associations between clinical characteristics and genetic alterations.Results: A total of 195 patients were studied: 78% intrahepatic and 22% extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. The most commonly altered genes in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma were IDH1 (30%), ARID1A (23%), BAP1 (20%), TP53 (20%), and FGFR2 gene fusions (14%). A tendency toward mutual exclusivity was seen between multiple genes in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma including TP53:IDH1, IDH1:KRAS, TP53:BAP1, and IDH1:FGFR2. Alterations in CDKN2A/B and ERBB2 were associated with reduced survival and time to progression on chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease. Genetic alterations with potential therapeutic implications were identified in 47% of patients, leading to biomarker-directed therapy or clinical trial enrollment in 16% of patients.Conclusions: Cholangiocarcinoma is a genetically diverse cancer. Alterations in CDKN2A/B and ERBB2 are associated with negative prognostic implications in patients with advanced disease. Somatic alterations with therapeutic implications were identified in almost half of patients. These prospective data provide a contemporary benchmark for guiding the development of targeted therapies in molecularly profiled cholangiocarcinoma, and support to the use of molecular profiling to guide therapy selection in patients with advanced biliary cancers. Clin Cancer Res; 24(17); 4154–61. ©2018 AACR.

Objective To determine whether genomic risk groups identified by somatic mutation testing of colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) can be used for "molecularly-guided" selection for adjuvant systemic chemotherapy and hepatic artery infusion of FUDR (SYS+HAI-FUDR). Background Several genomic biomarkers have been associated with clinical phenotype and survival for patients with resectable CRLM. It is unknown whether prognostication afforded by genomic stratification translates into enhanced patient selection for adjuvant hepatic artery infusion therapy. Methods Consecutive patients with resected CRLM and available mutational characterization via Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets (MSK-IMPACT) were reviewed from a prospective institutional database. Patients were stratified into three genomic risk groups based on previously defined alterations in SMAD4, EGFR and the RAS/RAF pathway. The association between SYS+HAI-FUDR and overall survival (OS), relative to adjuvant chemotherapy alone (SYS), was evaluated in each genomic risk group by Cox proportional hazard regression and propensity score matched analyses. Results A total of 334 patients (SYS+HAI-FUDR 204; SYS 130) were identified; the rates of RAS/RAF alterations and SMAD4 inactivation were 47.4% and 11.7%, respectively. After a median follow-up of 58 months, adjuvant SYS+HAI-FUDR was independently associated with a reduced risk of death (HR 0.50, 95%CI 0.26-0.98, p=0.045) in the low-risk genomic group, but not in the moderate-risk (HR 1.07, 95%CI 0.5-2.07, p=0.749) or high-risk (HR 1.62, 95%CI 0.29-9.12, p=0.537) cohorts. Following propensity score matching, adjuvant SYS+HAI-FUDR remained associated with significant improvements in long-term survival selectively in the low-risk genomic cohort (5-year actuarial survival: 89% vs. 68%, p=0.019). Conclusions Genomic alterations in RAS/RAF, SMAD4 and EGFR may be useful to guide treatment selection in resectable CRLM patients and warrant external validation and integration in future clinical trial design.

Purpose: Lymph node metastasis (LNM) drastically reduces survival after resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHC). Optimal treatment is ill defined, and it is unclear whether tumor mutational profiling can support treatment decisions. Experimental Design: Patients with liver-limited IHC with or without LNM treated with resection (N = 237), hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC; N = 196), or systemic chemotherapy alone (SYS; N = 140) at our institution between 2000 and 2018 were included. Genomic sequencing was analyzed to determine whether genetic alterations could stratify outcomes for patients with LNM. Results: For node-negative patients, resection was associated with the longest median overall survival [OS, 59.9 months; 95% confidence interval (CI), 47.2–74.31], followed by HAIC (24.9 months; 95% CI, 20.3–29.6), and SYS (13.7 months; 95% CI, 8.9–15.9; P < 0.001). There was no difference in survival for node-positive patients treated with resection (median OS, 19.7 months; 95% CI, 12.1–27.2) or HAIC (18.1 months; 95% CI, 14.1–26.6; P = 0.560); however, survival in both groups was greater than SYS (11.2 months; 95% CI, 14.1–26.6; P = 0.024). Node-positive patients with at least one high-risk genetic alteration (TP53 mutation, KRAS mutation, CDKN2A/B deletion) had worse survival compared to wild-type patients (median OS, 12.1 months; 95% CI, 5.7–21.5; P = 0.002), regardless of treatment. Conversely, there was no difference in survival for node-positive patients with IDH1/2 mutations compared to wild-type patients. Conclusions: There was no difference in OS for patients with node-positive IHC treated by resection versus HAIC, and both treatments had better survival than SYS alone. The presence of high-risk genetic alterations provides valuable prognostic information that may help guide treatment.

BACKGROUND: The utility of adjuvant chemotherapy after resection of colorectal liver metastasis (CLM) in patients with rapid recurrence after adjuvant chemotherapy for their primary tumor is unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the oncologic benefit of adjuvant hepatic arterial plus systemic chemotherapy (HAIC+Sys) in patients with early CLM. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of patients with early CLM (≤12 months of adjuvant chemotherapy for primary tumor) who received either HAIC+Sys, adjuvant systemic chemotherapy alone (Sys), or active surveillance (Surgery alone) following resection of CLM was performed. Recurrence and survival were compared between treatment groups using Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Of 239 patients undergoing resection of early CLM, 79 (33.1%) received HAIC+Sys, 77 (32.2%) received Sys, and 83 (34.7%) had Surgery alone. HAIC+Sys was independently associated with reduced risk of RFS events (adjusted hazard ratio [HRadj]: 0.64, 95%CI:0.44–0.94, p=0.022) and all-cause mortality (HRadj: 0.54, 95%CI:0.36–0.81, p=0.003) compared to Surgery alone patients. Largest tumor >5cm (HRadj: 2.03, 95%CI: 1.41–2.93, p

Purpose: The prevalence and clinical characteristics of small bowel adenocarcinomas (SBA) in the setting of Lynch syndrome have not been well studied. We characterized SBA according to DNA mismatch repair and/or microsatellite instability (MMR/MSI) and germline mutation status and compared clinical outcomes. Experimental Design: A single-institution review identified 100 SBAs. Tumors were evaluated for MSI via MSIsensor and/or corresponding MMR protein expression via IHC staining. Germline DNA was analyzed for mutations in known cancer predisposition genes, including MMR (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, and EPCAM). Clinical variables were correlated with MMR/MSI status. Results: Twenty-six percent (26/100; 95% confidence interval, 18.4–35.4) of SBAs exhibited MMR deficiency (MMR-D). Lynch syndrome prevalence was 10% overall and 38.5% among MMR-D SBAs. Median age at SBA diagnosis was similar in non-Lynch syndrome MMR-D versus MMR-proficient (MMR-P) SBAs (65 vs. 61; P = 0.75), but significantly younger in Lynch syndrome (47.5 vs. 61; P = 0.03). The prevalence of synchronous/metachronous cancers was 9% (6/67) in MMR-P versus 34.6% (9/26) in MMR-D SBA, with 66.7% (6/9) of these in Lynch syndrome (P = 0.0002). In the MMR-P group, 52.2% (35/67) of patients presented with metastatic disease, compared with 23.1% (6/26) in the MMR-D group (P = 0.008). In MMR-P stage I/II patients, 88.2% (15/17) recurred, compared with 18.2% (2/11) in the MMR-D group (P = 0.0002). Conclusions: When compared with MMR-P SBA, MMR-D SBA was associated with earlier stage disease and lower recurrence rates, similar to observations in colorectal cancer. With a 38.5% prevalence in MMR-D SBA, germline Lynch syndrome testing in MMR-D SBA is warranted.

PURPOSE: To evaluate safety and efficacy of radiation segmentectomy (RS) with (90)Y glass microspheres in patients with limited metastatic liver disease not amenable to resection or percutaneous ablation. METHODS: Patients with ≤3 tumors treated with RS from 6/2015–12/2017 were included. Target tumor radiation dose was > 190 Gy based on Medical Internal Radiation Dose (MIRD) dosimetry. Tumor response, local tumor progression (LTP), LTP-free survival (LTPFS) and disease progression rate in the treated segment were defined using Choi and RECIST 1.1 criteria. Toxicities were evaluated using modified SIR criteria. RESULTS: Ten patients with 14 tumors underwent 12 RS. Median tumor size was 3 cm (range, 1.4–5.6). Median follow-up was 17.8 months (range, 1.6–37.3). Response rates per Choi and RECIST 1.1 criteria were 8/8 (100%) and 4/9 (44%), respectively. Overall LTP rate was 3/14 (21%) during the study period. One-, two- and three -year LTPFS was 83%, 83% and 69%, respectively. Median LTPFS was not reached. Disease progression rate in the treated segment was 6/18 (33%). Median overal survival was 41.5 months (IQR, 16.7–41.5). Median delivered tumor radiation dose was 293 Gy (range, 163–1303). One major complication was recorded in a patient post-Whipple procedure who suffered anaphylactic reaction to prophylactic cefotetan and liver abscess in RS region 6.5 months post-RS. All patients were alive on last follow-up. CONCLUSION: RS of ≤ 3 hepatic segments can safely provide a two-year local tumor control rate of 83% in selected patients with limited metastatic liver disease and limited treatment options. Optimal dosimetry methodology requires further investigation.

BackgroundHepatic artery infusion (HAI) chemotherapy is associated with overall survival (OS) in patients with resected colon cancer liver metastases (CLM). The prognostic impact of primary tumor location in CLM following hepatic resection in patients receiving regional HAI is unknown. This study seeks to investigate the prognostic impact of HAI in relation to laterality in this patient population.MethodsConsecutive patients with resected CLM, with known primary tumor site treated with and without HAI, were reviewed from a prospective institutional database. Correlations between HAI, laterality, other clinicopathological factors, and survival were analyzed, and Cox proportional hazard regressionwas used to determine whether laterality was an independent prognostic factor.ResultsFrom 1993 to 2012, 487 patients [182 with right colon cancer (RCC),305 with left colon cancer (LCC)] were evaluated with a median follow-up of 6.5years. Fifty-seven percent(n = 275) received adjuvant HAI. Patients with RCC had inferior 5-year OS compared with LCC (56% vs. 67%,P = 0.01). HAI was associated with improved 5-year OS in both RCC (68% vs. 45%;P

OBJECTIVE: To examine genomic correlates of conversion to resection (CTR) and overall survival (OS) in patients with initially unresectable colorectal liver metastasis (IU-CRLM) treated with combination systemic and hepatic artery infusion (HAI) chemotherapy. BACKGROUND: In patients presenting with IU-CRLM, combination systemic and HAI chemotherapy enables CTR with associated long-term OS in a subset of patients. Genomic correlates of CTR and OS in IU-CRLM have not been previously explored. METHODS: Specimens from IU-CRLM patients receiving systemic/HAI chemotherapy (2003-2017) were submitted for next-generation sequencing. Fisher’s Exact test assessed associations with CTR, and Kaplan-Meier/Cox methods assessed associations with OS from HAI initiation. RESULTS: Of 128 IU-CRLM patients, 51 (40%) underwent CTR at median 6 months (range:3-35) from HAI initiation. CTR and persistently unresectable (PU) cohorts differed significantly in preoperative systemic chemotherapy exposure, node-positive primary status, and size of largest liver metastasis. Median and 5-year OS was 66 months and 51%. CTR was associated with prolonged survival (time-dependent HR 0.23, 95%CI:0.12-0.46, p

Background: This study investigated the effect of the reduced dose of systemic chemotherapy (SYS) on recurrence patterns in patients receiving adjuvant hepatic artery infusion (HAI) chemotherapy after complete colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) resection. Methods: Patients undergoing complete CRLM resection between 2000 and 2007 were selected from a prospectively maintained database and categorized as receiving SYS or HAI + SYS. Those with pre and/or intraoperative extrahepatic disease, documented death, or recurrence within 30 days of CRLM resection were excluded. Competing risk, Fine and Gray's tests were used to compare SYS versus HAI + SYS for time‐to‐organ recurrence. Results: Of 361 study patients, 153 (42.4%) received SYS and 208 (57.6%) received HAI + SYS. The median follow‐up for survivors was 100 (range = 12–185) and 156 months (range = 18–217) for SYS and HAI + SYS, respectively. The 5‐year cumulative incidence (CI) of any liver recurrence was greater for those receiving SYS (SYS = 41.9% vs. HAI + SYS = 28.6%, p = .005). The 5‐year CI of developing any lung or extrahepatic recurrence for SYS patients was 36.2% and 47.9% compared with 44.5% (p = .242) and 51.7% (p = .551), respectively, in patients receiving HAI + SYS. Conclusion: Despite the reduced dose of SYS, adjuvant HAI + SYS after CRLM resection is not associated with a significantly increased risk of extrahepatic recurrence.

BACKGROUND: The objective was to investigate the impact of adjuvant hepatic arterial infusion pump (HAIP) chemotherapy on the rates and patterns of recurrence and survival in patients with resected colorectal liver metastases (CRLM).METHODS: Recurrence rates, patterns, and survival were compared between patients treated with and without adjuvant HAIP using competing risk analyses.RESULTS: 2128 patients were included, of which 601 patients (28.2%) received adjuvant HAIP and systemic chemotherapy (HAIP + SYS). The overall recurrence rate was similar with HAIP + SYS or SYS (63.5% versus 64.2%,p = 0.74). The 5-year cumulative incidence of initial intrahepatic recurrences was lower with HAIP + SYS (22.9% versus 38.4%,p < 0.001). The 5-year cumulative incidence of initial extrahepatic recurrences was higher with HAIP + SYS (48.5% versus 40.3%,p = 0.005), because patients remained at risk for extrahepatic recurrence in the absence of intrahepatic recurrence, which was largely attributable to more pulmonary recurrences with HAIP + SYS (33.6% versus 23.7%,p < 0.001). HAIP was an independent prognostic factor for DFS (adjusted HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.60-0.79, p < 0.001), and OS (adjusted HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.57-0.78,p < 0.001).CONCLUSION: Adjuvant HAIP chemotherapy is associated with lower intrahepatic recurrence rates and better DFS and OS after resection of CRLM.

Background The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of adjuvant hepatic arterial infusion pump (HAIP) chemotherapy after complete resection or ablation of recurrent colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted of patients from two centers who were treated with resection and/or ablation of recurrent CRLM only between 1992 and 2018. Overall survival (OS) and hepatic disease-free survival (hDFS) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. The Cox regression method was used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results Of 374 eligible patients, 81 (22%) were treated with adjuvant HAIP chemotherapy. The median follow-up for survivors was 65 months (IQR 32–118 months). Patients receiving adjuvant HAIP were more likely to have multifocal disease and receive perioperative systemic chemotherapy at time of resection for recurrence. A median hDFS of 46 months (95% CI 29–81 months) was found in patients treated with adjuvant HAIP compared with 18 months (95% CI 15–26 months) in patients treated with resection and/or ablation alone (p = 0.001). The median OS and 5-year OS were 89 months (95% CI 52–126 months) and 66%, respectively, in patients treated with adjuvant HAIP compared with 57 months (95% CI 47–67 months) and 47%, respectively, in patients treated with resection and/or ablation only (p = 0.002). Adjuvant HAIP was associated with superior hDFS (adjusted HR 0.599, 95% CI 0.38–0.93, p = 0.02) and OS (adjusted HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.38–0.92, p = 0.02) in multivariable analysis. Conclusion Adjuvant HAIP chemotherapy after resection and/or ablation of recurrent CRLM is associated with superior hDFS and OS.

BACKGROUND: Hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) to oxaliplatin present a therapeutic challenge. The standard desensitization protocol consists of 12 infusion steps with three drug dilutions, often in an inpatient setting. Several years ago we implemented a simplified outpatient graded infusion protocol for oxaliplatin with two drug dilutions and three infusion steps. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of our experience to define the safety and outcomes associated with this simplified, ambulatory, graded infusion strategy. RESULTS: Between 1/1/2011 and 12/1/2020, 374 patients who had experienced an oxaliplatin-related HSR were treated via a 3-step graded infusion in the outpatient setting. Of these 374 patients, 283 (76%) did not experience a subsequent HSR, while 91 (24%) did experience a breakthrough HSR. Of the 374 patients, 19 (5%) experienced a grade 3 or 4 HSR. Three patients (0.8%) were hospitalized. There were no grade 5 (fatal) HSRs. Overall, the 374 patients received a median additional 3 cycles of oxaliplatin (range 1 – 41). The most common reasons for treatment discontinuation were disease progression (35%), breakthrough HSRs (24%), completion of treatment (21%) and toxicity other than HSR (20%). Fifteen patients who experienced breakthrough HSRs during a graded infusion were subsequently treated with the standard 12-step desensitization. Five of these 15 patients had an HSR during their initial desensitization and 5 developed an HSR on subsequent 12-step desensitizations. Thus, treatment was discontinued in 67% of these 15 patients due to persistent HSRs. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that the simplified 3-step graded infusion protocol is a safe outpatient strategy for patients with a history of HSR to oxaliplatin.

595 Background: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHC) is characterized by marked clinical heterogeneity, likely the result of multiple cells of origin and variable driver gene alterations. The hidden-genome classifier is a statistical algorithm that classifies tumors by integrating multi-level genomic features. In this study, we trained the hidden-genome classifier with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EHC), gallbladder cancer (GBC) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) as extremes of a spectrum to quantify the genetic heterogeneity of IHC with a view toward improved tumor classification. Methods: An IRB approved retrospective review of patients with biopsy confirmed IHC, EHC, GBC and HCC was conducted. All tumors were subjected to MSK-IMPACT to determine the mutational profile. A two-class model was built and internally validated with the genomic data of EHC/GBC as one class and HCC as the other class. IHC tumors were analyzed in the model and classified into three groups based on their proportional genetic resemblance to EHC/GBC (Biliary Class) or HCC (HCC Class), with the remainder as Intermediate Class. The classification thresholds were 90% resemblance to EHC/GBC or HCC and were determined by the inflection point of predicted survival. The survivals of the three groups were analyzed and compared. Results: A total of 1497 patients were included: IHC (733), EHC (208), GBC (258) and HCC (298). 527 IHC tumors with complete metagenetic information were analyzed in the model, showing a continuous spectrum of alterations, ranging from Biliary Class (122 tumors), Intermediate Class (375 tumors) to HCC Class (30 tumor). The biliary-class IHC was characterized by frequent alterations of IDH1 R132C, KRAS, SMAD4, ERBB2 gain, MDM2 gain, and CKDN2A loss, while the HCC-class IHC was primarily characterized by TERT alterations. In patients with unresected IHCs, the median survival ranged from 1 year (CI 0.77, 1.5) in Biliary Class, 1.8 years (CI 1.5, 2.0) in Intermediate Class, to 2 years (CI 0.93, NR) in HCC Class. In patients subjected to resection, the median survival of Biliary Class (2.4 years, CI 2.1, NR) was lower than both the Intermediate Class (5.1 years, CI 4.8, 6.9) and the HCC Class (3.4 years, CI 2.7, NR). Conclusions: By integrating multi-level genomic features, we leveraged the mutational heterogeneity to classify IHC based on its resemblance to EHC/GBC or HCC tumors. We found that the survival in IHC patients appeared to decline with increasing genomic similarity to Biliary Class. The results support a genomic basis for IHC’s variable clinical behavior and point to a role of mutational testing to guide clinical intervention. [Table: see text]

560 Background: Randomized data suggest improved survival with adjuvant chemotherapy for biliary tract cancers, but subset analyses of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) show limited survival benefit. This study uses a large bi-institutional cohort of resected ICC patients to evaluate the impact of adjuvant therapy on recurrence patterns and overall survival (OS) and compares these findings to data from a national cancer registry. Methods: Patients with resected ICC were identified within a bi-institutional cohort (Duke and Memorial Sloan Kettering, 1997-2020) and the National Cancer Database (NCDB, 2010-2018). Patients were stratified by treatment with adjuvant chemotherapy (adj). Site of first recurrence was categorized as local (liver only), regional (liver and perihepatic nodes), nodal (perihepatic nodes only), distant, or mixed (both liver and distant). OS was compared with Kaplan-Meier methods. Results: 367 patients underwent resection for ICC, and 163 (44%) patients received adjuvant therapy. Median follow-up was 33 vs. 44 months (adj vs observation (obs), p=0.15). 263 (72%) patients had recurrent disease, most commonly in the liver (72%). There was no difference in recurrence patterns stratified by treatment with adjuvant chemotherapy (% recurrence, adj vs obs; local: 42 vs 42; regional: 2 vs 2; nodal: 0 vs 3; distant only: 27 vs 26; mixed: 29 vs 27, p=0.5). OS was the same between groups (adj vs obs; 42 vs 49 months, p=0.3) and when stratified by recurrence site (p=0.5). Similarly, in an NCDB cohort of 1,159 ICC patients over the same time period, there was no association between adjuvant therapy and OS (adj vs obs; 49 vs 57 months, p=0.1). Conclusions: In this retrospective dual registry analysis, corroborated by national data, adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with an improvement in OS in ICC patients subjected to curative intent resection. Further, adjuvant therapy had no impact on the high rate of hepatic recurrence, suggesting that alternative strategies, such as liver directed therapies, are needed to improve recurrence rates and OS.

Background: Thermal ablation is a definitive local treatment for selected colorectal liver metastases (CLM) that can be ablated with adequate margins. A critical limitation has been local tumor progression (LTP). Methods: This prospective, single-group, phase 2 study enrolled patients with CLM < 5 cm in maximum diameter, at a tertiary cancer center between November 2009 and February 2019. Biopsy of the ablation zone center and margin was performed immediately after ablation. Viable tumor in tissue biopsy and ablation margins < 5 mm were assessed as predictors of 12-month LTP. Results: We enrolled 107 patients with 182 CLMs. Mean tumor size was 2.0 (range, 0.6–4.6) cm. Microwave ablation was used in 51% and radiofrequency ablation in 49% of tumors. The 12- and 24-month cumulative incidence of LTP was 22% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 17, 29) and 29% (95% CI: 23, 36), respectively. LTP at 12 months was 7% (95% CI: 3, 14) for the biopsy tumor-negative ablation zone with margins ≥ 5 mm vs. 63% (95% CI: 35, 85) for the biopsy-positive ablation zone with margins < 5 mm (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Biopsy-proven complete tumor ablation with margins of at least 5 mm achieves optimal local tumor control for CLM, regardless of the ablation modality used.

BACKGROUND: After resection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), recurrent disease in the liver is a major cause of death, but may be reduced with the addition of adjuvant hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) chemotherapy to systemic chemotherapy (SYS). OBJECTIVE: This study investigates organ-specific causes of death in patients receiving adjuvant HAI and SYS compared with adjuvant SYS alone. METHODS: Between 2000 and 2007, patients undergoing complete CRLM resection were identified from a prospectively maintained liver resection database and categorized as receiving HAI+SYS or SYS only. Using newly constructed definitions, mortality was attributed to specific organs (liver, lung, peritoneum, and brain) or infection. Univariate models and cumulative incidence functions were generated using competing risks methods. RESULTS: Of 361 eligible patients, 208 (57.6%) received HAI+SYS and 153 (42.4%) received SYS. The median follow-up among survivors was 142 months (range= 12–217 months). Ten-year overall survival was 50.6% in the HAI+SYS group compared to 30.9% in those receiving SYS (p= 0.004). The 5-year cumulative incidence of liver-related mortality was 6.8% in the HAI+SYS group compared to 14.3% in SYS group (p= 0.007). CONCLUSION: The addition of HAI to systemic chemotherapy after CRLM resection is associated with a 50% reduction in liver-related mortality at 5 years.

Purpose: We aimed to investigate genomic correlates underlying extremes of survivorship in metastatic colorectal cancer and their applicability in informing survival in distinct subsets of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Experimental Design: We examined differences in oncogenic somatic alterations between metastatic colorectal cancer cohorts demonstrating extremes of survivorship following complete metastasectomy: ≤2-year (n = 17) and ≥10-year (n = 18) survivors. Relevant genomic findings, and their association with overall survival (OS), were validated in two independent datasets of 935 stage IV and 443 resected stage I–IV patients. Results: In the extremes-of-survivorship cohort, significant co-occurrence of KRAS hotspot mutations and TP53 alterations was observed in ≤2-year survivors (P < 0.001). When validating these findings in the independent cohort of 935 stage IV patients, incorporation of the cumulative effect of any oncogenic Ras/B-raf (i.e., either KRAS, NRAS, or BRAF) and TP53 alteration generated three prognostic clusters: (i) TP53-altered alone (median OS, 132 months); (ii) Ras/B-raf–altered alone (65 months) or Ras/B-raf- and TP53 pan-wild-type (60 months); and (iii) coaltered Ras/B-raf–TP53 (40 months; P < 0.0001). Coaltered Ras/B-raf–TP53 was independently associated with mortality (HR, 2.47; 95% confidence interval, 1.91–3.21; P < 0.001). This molecular profile predicted survival in the second independent cohort of 443 resected stage I–IV patients. Coaltered Ras/B-raf–TP53 was associated with worse OS in patients with liver (n = 490) and lung (n = 172) but not peritoneal surface (n = 149) metastases. Moreover, coaltered Ras/B-raf–TP53 tumors were significantly more likely to involve extrahepatic metastatic sites with limited salvage options. Conclusions: Genomic analysis of extremes of survivorship following colorectal cancer metastasectomy identifies a prognostic role for coaltered Ras/B-raf–TP53 and its association with distinct patterns of colorectal cancer metastasis.

Background The 10-year overall survival with adjuvant hepatic arterial infusion pump (HAIP) chemotherapy after resection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) was 61% in clinical trials from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. A pilot study was performed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of adjuvant HAIP chemotherapy in patients with resectable CRLMs. Study Design A phase II study was performed in two centers in The Netherlands. Patients with resectable CRLM without extrahepatic disease were eligible. All patients underwent complete resection and/or ablation of CRLMs and pump implantation. Safety was determined by the 90-day HAIP-related postoperative complications from the day of pump placement (Clavien–Dindo classification, grade III or higher) and feasibility by the successful administration of the first cycle of HAIP chemotherapy. Results A total of 20 patients, with a median age of 57 years (interquartile range [IQR] 51–64) were included. Grade III or higher HAIP-related postoperative complications were found in two patients (10%), both of whom had a reoperation (without laparotomy) to replace a pump with a slow flow rate or to reposition a flipped pump. No arterial bleeding, arterial dissection, arterial thrombosis, extrahepatic perfusion, pump pocket hematoma, or pump pocket infections were found within 90 days after surgery. After a median of 43 days (IQR 29–52) following surgery, all patients received the first dose of HAIP chemotherapy, which was completed uneventfully in all patients. Conclusion Pump implantation is safe, and administration of HAIP chemotherapy is feasible, in patients with resectable CRLMs, after training of a dedicated multidisciplinary team.

BACKGROUND: Obesity and metabolic syndrome are associated with inflammatory hepatic parenchymal disease (HPD) and increased risk for recurrence after resection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). The independent impact of HPD on recurrence patterns has not been well-defined. METHODS: The non-alcoholic fatty liver disease activity score (NAS) was used to quantify HPD including steatosis and fibrosis for all patients with completely resected CRLM between April 2003 and March 2007. Clinicopathologic factors, perioperative history, and outcomes were compared to the NAS. Fisher’s exact test examined the association between severe HPD (NAS≥3) with clinical and perioperative characteristics. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate recurrence-free survival (RFS). The cumulative incidence of recurrence (any intrahepatic recurrence (IHR), extrahepatic recurrence only (EHR), and death without recurrence (DWR)), were estimated using competing risks methods. RESULTS: Among the 357 patients included in this study, microsteatosis was noted in 124 (35%) patients, severe HPD in 31 (9%), steatohepatitis in 14 (4%), and sinusoidal injury in 36 (10%). After a median follow-up of 127 months (range=4-175), 10-year RFS was 22% (95%CI=17-27%). Ten-year cumulative incidence for IHR, EHR, and DWR was 37%, 30%, and 12%, respectively. After controlling for confounders, NAS≥3 was independently associated with higher risk of IHR (HR=1.76, 95%CI=1.07-2.90, p=0.027) and lower risk of EHR (HR=0.18, 95%CI=0.04-0.75, p=0.019) on multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION: Severe HPD was associated with increased IHR risk and decreased EHR risk. Future investigation into whether improving hepatic parenchymal disease from reversible etiologies can reduce the risk for intrahepatic recurrence is warranted.

Locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma are associated with a grim prognosis. The development of highly effective systemic therapies for these tumors has been challenging; however, numerous locoregional treatment alternatives have emerged, including transarterial hepatic embolization (TAE), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), drug-eluting bead TACE (DEB-TACE), hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAI), radioembolization, and stereotactic body radiation therapy. Although there is potential for long-term disease control for these therapies, the evidence to guide adequate patient selection and choose among different treatment alternatives is still limited. This review focuses on the rationale and data supporting TAE, TACE, DEB-TACE, and HAI in hepatobiliary cancers.

BACKGROUND: Lung chemoembolization is an emerging treatment option for lung tumors, but the optimal embolic, drug, and technique are unknown. PURPOSE: To determine the technical success rate and safety of bronchial or pulmonary artery chemoembolization of lung metastases using ethiodized oil, mitomycin, and microspheres. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with unresectable and unablatable lung, endobronchial, or mediastinal metastases, who failed systemic chemotherapy, were enrolled in this prospective, single-center, single-arm, phase I clinical trial (December 2019–September 2020). Pulmonary and bronchial angiography was performed to determine the blood supply to the lung metastases. Based on the angiographic findings, bronchial or pulmonary artery chemoembolization was performed using an ethiodized oil and mitomycin emulsion, followed by microspheres. The primary objectives were technical success rate and safety, according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. CIs of proportions were estimated with the equal-tailed Jeffreys prior interval, and correlations were evaluated with the Spearman test. RESULTS: Ten participants (median age, 60 years; interquartile range, 52–70 years; six women) were evaluated. Nine of the 10 participants (90%) had lung metastases supplied by the bronchial artery, and one of the 10 participants (10%) had lung metastases supplied by the pulmonary artery. The technical success rate of intratumoral drug delivery was 10 of 10 (100%) (95% CI: 78, 100). There were no severe adverse events (95% CI: 0, 22). The response rate of treated tumors was one of 10 (10%) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors and four of 10 (40%) according to the PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors. Ethiodized oil retention at 4–6 weeks was correlated with reduced tumor size (ρ = –0.83, P = .003) and metabolic activity (ρ = –0.71, P = .03). Pharmacokinetics showed that 45% of the mitomycin dose underwent burst release in 2 minutes, and 55% of the dose was retained intratumorally with a half-life of more than 5 hours. The initial tumor-to-plasma ratio of mitomycin concentration was 380. CONCLUSION: Lung chemoembolization was technically successful for the treatment of lung, mediastinal, and endobronchial metastases, with no severe adverse events. Clinical trial registration no. NCT04200417 © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Georgiades et al in this issue.

Background The causative factors for the recent increase in early-onset colorectal cancer (EO-CRC) incidence are unknown. We sought to determine if early-onset disease is clinically or genomically distinct from average-onset colorectal cancer (AO-CRC). Methods Clinical, histopathologic, and genomic characteristics of EO-CRC patients (2014-2019), divided into age 35 years and younger and 36-49 years at diagnosis, were compared with AO-CRC (50 years and older). Patients with mismatch repair deficient tumors, CRC-related hereditary syndromes, and inflammatory bowel disease were excluded from all but the germline analysis. All statistical tests were 2-sided. Results In total, 759 patients with EO-CRC (35 years, n = 151; 36-49 years, n = 608) and AO-CRC (n = 687) were included. Left-sided tumors (35 years and younger = 80.8%; 36-49 years = 83.7%; AO = 63.9%; P Conclusions EO-CRCs are more commonly left-sided and present with rectal bleeding and abdominal pain but are otherwise clinically and genomically indistinguishable from AO-CRCs. Aggressive treatment regimens based solely on the age at CRC diagnosis are not warranted.

Objective/background The purpose was to determine whether adding Pmab versus no Pmab to an adjuvant regimen of hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) of floxuridine (FUDR) plus systemic (SYS) leucovorin, fluorouracil, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) improves 15-month recurrence-free survival for patients with RAS wild-type colorectal cancer. Secondary endpoints included overall survival, toxicity, and influence of predictive biomarkers. Methods This phase II trial randomized patients with KRAS wild-type resected colorectal liver metastases to adjuvant HAI FUDR + SYS FOLFIRI +/- Pmab (NCT01312857). Patients were stratified by clinical risk score and previous chemotherapy. Based on an exact binomial design, if one arm had ≥24 patients alive and disease-free at 15 months that regimen was considered promising for further investigation. Results Seventy-five patients were randomized. Patient characteristics and toxicity were not different in the 2 arms, except for rash in +Pmab arm. Grade 3/4 elevation in bilirubin or alkaline phosphatase did not differ in the 2 arms. Twenty-five (69%; 95% CI, 53-82) patients in the Pmab arm versus 18 (47%; 95% CI, 32-63) patients in the arm without Pmab were alive and recurrence-free at 15 months. Only the Pmab arm met the decision rule, while the other arm did not. After median follow-up of 56.6 months, 3-year recurrence-free survival was 57% (95% CI, 43-76) and 42% (95% CI, 29-61), and 3-year overall survival was 97% (95% CI, 90-99) and 91% (95% CI, 83-99), +/- Pmab, respectively. Conclusions The addition of Pmab to HAI FUDR + SYS FOLFIRI showed promising activity without increased biliary toxicity and should be further investigated in a larger trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Genetic alterations in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) are increasingly well characterized, but their impact on outcome and prognosis remains unknown. APPROACH AND RESULTS: This bi-institutional study of patients with confirmed iCCA (n = 412) used targeted next-generation sequencing of primary tumors to define associations among genetic alterations, clinicopathological variables, and outcome. The most common oncogenic alterations were isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1; 20%), AT-rich interactive domain–containing protein 1A (20%), tumor protein P53 (TP53; 17%), cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (CDKN2A; 15%), breast cancer 1–associated protein 1 (15%), FGFR2 (15%), polybromo 1 (12%), and KRAS (10%). IDH1/2 mutations (mut) were mutually exclusive with FGFR2 fusions, but neither was associated with outcome. For all patients, TP53 (P < 0.0001), KRAS (P = 0.0001), and CDKN2A (P < 0.0001) alterations predicted worse overall survival (OS). These high-risk alterations were enriched in advanced disease but adversely impacted survival across all stages, even when controlling for known correlates of outcome (multifocal disease, lymph node involvement, bile duct type, periductal infiltration). In resected patients (n = 209), TP53mut (HR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.08–3.06; P = 0.03) and CDKN2A deletions (del; HR, 3.40; 95% CI, 1.95–5.94; P < 0.001) independently predicted shorter OS, as did high-risk clinical variables (multifocal liver disease [P < 0.001]; regional lymph node metastases [P < 0.001]), whereas KRASmut (HR, 1.69; 95% CI, 0.97–2.93; P = 0.06) trended toward statistical significance. The presence of both or neither high-risk clinical or genetic factors represented outcome extremes (median OS, 18.3 vs. 74.2 months; P < 0.001), with high-risk genetic alterations alone (median OS, 38.6 months; 95% CI, 28.8–73.5) or high-risk clinical variables alone (median OS, 37.0 months; 95% CI, 27.6-not available) associated with intermediate outcome. TP53mut, KRASmut, and CDKN2Adel similarly predicted worse outcome in patients with unresectable iCCA. CDKN2Adel tumors with high-risk clinical features were notable for limited survival and no benefit of resection over chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: TP53, KRAS, and CDKN2A alterations were independent prognostic factors in iCCA when controlling for clinical and pathologic variables, disease stage, and treatment. Because genetic profiling can be integrated into pretreatment therapeutic decision-making, combining clinical variables with targeted tumor sequencing may identify patient subgroups with poor outcome irrespective of treatment strategy.

To evaluate liver venous deprivation (LVD) outcomes in patients with colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) heavily pretreated with systemic and hepatic arterial infusion pump (HAIP) chemotherapies that had an anticipated insufficient future liver remnant (FLR) hypertrophy after portal vein embolization (PVE).PVE was performed with liquid embolics using a transsplenic or ipsilateral transhepatic approach. Simultaneously and via a trans-jugular approach, the right hepatic vein was embolized with vascular plugs. Liver volumetry was assessed on computed tomography before and 3-6 weeks after LVD.Twelve consecutive CRLM patients that underwent LVD before right hepatectomy or trisectionectomy were included, all previously treated with systemic chemotherapy for a mean of 11.9 months. Six patients had additional HAIP. After embolization, FLR ratio increased from 28.7% ± 5.9 to 42.2% ± 9.0 (P 0.01). Mean kinetic growth rate (KGR) was 3.56%/week ± 2.3, with a degree of hypertrophy (DH) of 13.8% ± 7.1. In the HAIP subgroup, mean KGR and DH were respectively 3.58%/week ± 2.8 and 14.3% ± 8.7. No severe complications occurred. Ten patients reached surgery after 39 days ± 7.5.In heavily pretreated patients, LVD safely stimulated a rapid and effective FLR hypertrophy, with a resultant high rate of resection.