Search

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs), a class of targeted cancer therapeutics combining monoclonal antibodies with a cytotoxic payload via a chemical linker, have already been approved for the treatment of several cancer types, with extensive clinical development of novel constructs ongoing. Primary and secondary brain tumours are associated with high mortality and morbidity, necessitating novel treatment approaches. Pharmacotherapy of brain tumours can be limited by restricted drug delivery across the blood–brain or blood–tumour barrier, although data from phase II studies of the HER2-targeted ADC trastuzumab deruxtecan indicate clinically relevant intracranial activity in patients with brain metastases from HER2+ breast cancer. However, depatuxizumab mafodotin, an ADC targeting wild-type EGFR and EGFR variant III, did not provide a definitive overall survival benefit in patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent EGFR-amplified glioblastoma in phase II and III trials, despite objective radiological responses in some patients. In this Review, we summarize the available data on the central nervous system activity of ADCs from trials involving patients with primary and secondary brain tumours and discuss their clinical implications. Furthermore, we explore pharmacological determinants of intracranial activity and discuss the optimal design of clinical trials to facilitate development of ADCs for the treatment of gliomas and brain metastases.

Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential after (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy versus endocrine therapy for early breast cancer: the CIRCE-eBC prospective cohort study Background: Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) is an age-related condition associated with higher risk of hematologic malignancies, cardiovascular disease, and all-cause mortality. Patients (pts) with early breast cancer (eBC) receiving chemotherapy (CT) have increased risk of treatment-related myeloid neoplasms (tMN); the benefit of CT in eBC pts is often limited. Little is known about the prevalence and dynamics of CHIP in eBC pts. Methods: We prospectively identified two cohorts of pts with eBC: cohort A – pts receiving (neo)adjuvant CT with or without adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET); cohort B – pts receiving ET only. Blood was collected prior to initiation of treatment (T1) and after either (neo)adjuvant CT or 6-18 months of adjuvant ET (T2). We performed targeted sequencing of cryopreserved peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC)-derived genomic DNA and defined CHIP as the presence of ≥1 pathogenic somatic mutation at variant allele fraction (VAF) ≥0.02. In additional analyses we used VAF≥0.005. Results: We enrolled 118 and 116 pts in cohorts A and B, respectively. Pts in cohort A were younger (median age 51 vs 57, p< 0.001), less frequently Caucasian (83.9 vs 96.6%; p=0.005) and former/current smokers (28.0 vs 43.1%, p=0.038). All pts in cohort B had hormone receptor-positive (HR+) eBC; in cohort A 50% of pts had HR+/HER2-, 16% had HR+/HER2+, 8.5% had HR-/HER2+ and 25.4% had HR-/HER2- eBC (p< 0.001). Pts in cohort A had higher stage (stage II-III 68.7 vs 27.6%; p< 0.001) and grade (grade 3 65.3 vs 15.5%; p< 0.001) tumors. Genetic testing was more frequently performed in pts receiving CT (88.1 vs 68.1%, p< 0.001), though the rate of germline pathogenic variants was similar (13.5 vs 17.7%, p=0.079). In cohort A, 38% received anthracyclines, 7% platinum and 57% anthracycline/platinum-sparing CT. Median time between T1 and T2 was 189.5 (150,406) and 280 (147, 425) days in cohort A and B (p< 0.001). The prevalence of CHIP, defined by mutations at VAF ≥ 0.02, was similar at T1 in cohort A (14.4%) vs B (18.1%) (p=0.556). Number of pts with new CHIP variants at T2 was also similar (A 3.4% vs B 6.0%) (p=0.373). After adjusting for age and stage, odds ratio (OR) of developing new CHIP variants in cohort B vs A was 1.28 (95% CI 0.32 – 5.68, p=0.733). Age correlated with baseline prevalence of CHIP (p< 0.001). Most frequent new CHIP variants at T2 in cohort A were DNMT3A (3), PPM1D (1), NF1 (1). To investigate whether pts receiving CT were more likely to have emergence of small hematopoietic clones, we assessed pathogenic variants present at VAF ≥0.005. These were detected at T1 in 55 (46.6%) and 61 (52.6%) pts in cohort A and B, respectively. Few pts without pathogenic variants at T1 developed them at T2 (3 pts in cohort A and 4 in cohort B). 21 pts (27 variants) in cohort A and 11 pts (12 variants) in cohort B had new variants at T2. Pts with new variants vs not (32 vs 202 pts) had similar characteristics, excepting age (median 60.5 vs 54.0, p=0.011). After correcting for age and stage, OR of developing new pathogenic variants given ET vs CT was 0.25 (95% CI 0.10-0.62, p=0.003). Most frequent newly detected variants were in DNMT3A (14), PPM1D (5), TET2 (4) and TP53 (2) in cohort A; DNMT3A (3), TET2 (3) and ZNF318 (2) in cohort B. Conclusions: In the CIRCE-eBC study, CT administration did not lead to emergence of CHIP over a 6-9 month period vs ET alone. This finding is reassuring in the setting of long life-expectancy for eBC pts and the association of CHIP with significant morbidity and mortality. However, consistent with known risk of development of MN, CT was associated with emergence of low frequency pathogenic variants in PPM1D and TP53, which have been associated with elevated risk of tMN. The evolution and prognostic role of these small clones is unclear and warrants additional investigation. Citation Format: Stefania Morganti, Qingchun Jin, Katheryn Santos, Christopher Gibson, Ashka Patel, Alex Wilson, Margaret Merrill, Julie Vincuilla, Samantha Stokes, Marla Lipsyc-Sharf, Tonia Parker, Tari King, Elizabeth A. Mittendorf, Giuseppe Curigliano, Melissa E. Hughes, Nabihah Tayob, Nancy U. Lin, Peter Miller, Sara Tolaney, Judy Garber, Heather A. Parsons. Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential after (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy versus endocrine therapy for early breast cancer: the CIRCE-eBC prospective cohort study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-14-03.

Background: About half of all breast cancers exhibit low HER2 expression. Despite lack of ERBB2 amplification, HER2-low tumors respond to trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), leading to the NCCN recommendation of T-DXd both for patients with HER2+ and HER2-low metastatic breast cancer (MBC). It remains however unclear if HER2-low represents a distinct molecular entity, as compared to HER2-0 MBC. Here, we compare the genomic landscape of HER2-low versus HER2-0 breast cancers in a large, single institution cohort. Methods: We identified consecutive patients with MBC seen at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute between 07/2013 and 12/2020. Patients were included if they had HER2-negative MBC per ASCO/CAP Guidelines and had undergone next generation sequencing (NGS) testing with a targeted, tumor-only platform (OncoPanel). Based on the HER2 status of the specimen tested by NGS, patients were divided into 2 groups: (i) HER2-low if immunohistochemistry (IHC) 1+ or 2+ non-amplified, or (ii) HER2-0 if IHC 0. Mutations of interest detected on NGS were classified as oncogenic using the OncoKB tool and additional annotation. Genomic profiles of HER2-low and HER2-0 tumors were compared using Chi-Square and Kruskal-Wallis tests. To determine genomic event enrichment between the two HER2 groups, logistic regression models were used, accounting for background rate and estrogen receptor (ER) expression. ERBB2 copy counts were calculated for tumors with recorded histology-estimated purities and copy-number segmentation using a simple model of allelic gain/loss. Results: Among 1847 patients with HER2-negative MBC, 1043 underwent NGS testing on a HER2-low (n=489, 47%) or HER2-0 sample (n=554, 53%). Most samples were metastatic (71%, n=743) while 29% (n=300) were from primary tumors. 73% had ductal histology, 13% were lobular and 14% had mixed or other histology. ER expression was enriched among HER2-low vs. HER2-0 tumors (76% vs. 60%; p< 0.001). Focusing on the most commonly occurring genetic mutations, no major differences were observed in HER2-low vs. HER2-0 tumors, after correcting for ER status (Table 1). Among all mutational events, any mutation in MPL, CYLD, and MAP3K and oncogenic mutations in TP53 and NF1 were more common in HER2-0, while any mutation in MTOR, RAD21, DNMT3A, and PDGFRA were enriched in HER2-low patients, when controlling for ER status and background mutational rate (p< 0.05). However, no mutation reached significance after accounting for multiple hypothesis testing. Similarly, no deep deletion or high amplification CNV events reached significance for either group. Analysis of tumor mutational burden in HER2-low vs. HER-0 tumors revealed no significant differences (median: 7.26 muts/Mb vs. 7.60 muts/Mb, p=1.00), including when accounting for ER status. Finally, among tumors with sufficient tumor purity for ERBB2 copy count analysis (n=374 and 419 for HER2-low and HER2-0, respectively), HER2-low tumors had a significantly higher number of ERBB2 alleles as compared to HER2-0 (< 2 copies, 15.0% vs. 30.9%, 2 copies 67.4% vs. 60.5%, and >2 copies, 17.6% vs. 8.6%; p< 0.001 by Kruskal-Wallis). Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the largest comprehensive genomic analysis of HER2-low MBC to date. In our cohort of patients with HER2-negative MBC, the genomic landscape of HER2-low and HER2-0 tumors did not differ significantly, apart from a higher number of ERBB2 alleles. These data further support the notion that HER2-low, as currently defined, is not a distinct molecular subtype of breast cancer. Citation Format: Paolo Tarantino, Hersh V. Gupta, Melissa E. Hughes, Janet L. Files, Sarah Strauss, Gregory Kirkner, Anne-Marie Feeney, Yvonne Y. Li, Ana C. Garrido-Castro, Romualdo Barroso-Sousa, Brittany Bychkovsky, Laura MacConaill, Neal Lindeman, Bruce Johnson, Matthew Meyerson, Sheheryar Kabraji, Rinath Jeselsohn, Xintao Qiu, Rong Li, Henry W. Long, Eric Winer, Deborah A. Dillon, Giuseppe Curigliano, Andrew Cherniack, Sara Tolaney, Nancy U. Lin. HER2-05 Comprehensive genomic characterization of HER2-low breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr HER2-05.

Background. Patients (pts) who develop MBC at older ages are underrepresented in clinical trials, are less likely to be included in comprehensive biomarker characterization studies, and experience worse breast cancer-specific survival than their younger counterparts. Elucidating genomic underpinnings of MBC and possible therapeutic targets for older breast cancer patients are critical priorities. Methods. We identified pts age >70 years at MBC diagnosis and a younger cohort (ages 50-69; age < 50), who were treated for MBC at a single center and who had their metastatic (or if not available, the primary) tumor, assessed by a targeted, tumor-only next generation sequencing (NGS) platform (OncoPanel) between 2013-2020. The NGS panel included mutations, copy number variation, tumor mutational burden (TMB), and hypermutation (HM) status, with mutations classified as oncogenic using the OncoKB tool and additional annotation. Copy number events were selected as being “oncogenic” if a high amplification was called for an oncogene or a deep deletion for a tumor suppressor. We compared findings for older (age >70) vs. younger (age < 50 and ages 50-69) MBC pts using Chi-Square and Kruskal-Wallis tests. To determine genomic event enrichment, logistic regression (LR) models were used, controlling for age (continuous), background rate, and tumor subtype (those with unknown subtype [n=27] were excluded from models). False discovery rate (FDR) was used to correct for multiple hypothesis testing. Results. The final analytic cohort included 2,380 pts. The median age at MBC diagnosis was 54.1 years overall (range 18.5- 91.9) and 73.6 years for those age >70. A total of 137 metastatic and 76 primary tumors were sequenced in pts age >70; in those age < 70, 1383 metastatic and 784 primary tumors were sequenced (for age < 50 [n=857] and 50-69 [n=1310]). Older pts were more likely to present with HR+/HER2- tumors (70.9% v. 62.4% v. 52.4%), and less likely to present with HER2+ (9.4% v. 14.4% v. 22.8%) or triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) (18.8% v. 21.9% vs. 24.0%) at MBC diagnosis (listed >70, 50-69, < 50; P=1e-7). Older pts had higher average TMB vs. younger pts (9.57 in pts > 70, 8.56 in ages 50-69, 7.34 in ages < 50; P=3.5e-5). This was due to older pts having a higher incidence of hypermutation status as defined as TMB >10: 26.3% in age >70, 23.2% in ages 50-69, 16.8% in age < 50. Using q=0.1 as the threshold of significance, the presence of CDH1, PIK3CA, MAP3K1, TET2, and AKT oncogenic mutations were also enriched in older pts, while the presence of oncogenic GATA3, BRCA2, and TP53 mutations, as well as any mutation in BRCA1 were enriched in younger pts (too few oncogenic BRCA1 mutations were present for accurate modeling). The frequency of oncogenic PIK3CA mutations in HR+/HER2- tumors was highest in the oldest pts (44.4% in pts age >70 v. 31.6% in age 50-69 v. 26.7% in age < 50). Of pts who had oncogenic BRCA1/2 mutations identified on tumor-only NGS testing and underwent clinical germline testing (n=7 v. 60 v. 67, oldest to youngest), older pts had the lowest incidence of germline BRCA pathogenic variants (14.3% vs. 47.2.% vs. 67.2%; p=0.01); most BRCA mutations identified on NGS testing in older patients were considered likely somatic. When assessing enrichment in copy number events, ERBB2, RAD21, and BRIP1 amplifications were all significantly less frequent in older pts (q< 0.1), even when accounting for tumor subtype. Conclusions. In a large cohort of pts with MBC, the mutational and copy number landscape for older pts differs from that in younger pts, even after controlling for tumor subtype. Key actionable findings include a higher proportion of high TMB and PIK3CA-mutated tumors, emphasizing the importance of genomic profile testing in this pt population and further exploration of efficacy and tolerability of relevant therapies in those age >70 years. Citation Format: Hersh V. Gupta, Rachel Freedman, Melissa E. Hughes, Yvonne Y. Li, Gregory Kirkner, Janet L. Files, Sarah Strauss, Ana C. Garrido-Castro, Lauren Buckley, Romualdo Barroso-Sousa, Brittany Bychkovsky, Sara Tolaney, Laura MacConaill, Neal Lindeman, Bruce Johnson, Matthew Meyerson, Eric Winer, Deborah A. Dillon, Andrew Cherniack, Nancy U. Lin. Tumor Genomic Landscape in Older Women with Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-14-06.

Background: Patients (pts) with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive breast cancer (HER2+ BC) have a high incidence (up to 50%) of brain metastasis (BM) despite advances in treatment (Zimmer AS et al. Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2020;e1274; Hurvitz SA et al. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25:2433-2441). Although several agents have been studied in pts with HER2+ BC with BM, an unmet medical need remains. In DESTINY-Breast01, T-DXd demonstrated efficacy in the overall population and preliminary efficacy in a pt subgroup with stable BM (n=24), with a confirmed objective response rate (ORR) of 61.4%, an extracranial confirmed ORR by independent central review (ICR) of 58.3%, respectively, and median progression-free survival (PFS) of 19.4 and 18.1 months, respectively (Modi S et al. Cancer Res. 2021. Abst PD3-06; Jerusalem G et al. Ann Oncol. 2020. Abst 138O). T-DXd also demonstrated preliminary efficacy in a subgroup of pts with BM in the DESTINY-Breast03 trial, with an extracranial ORR of 67.4%, intracranial ORR of 63.9%, and median PFS of 15.0 months (Hurvitz S et al. SABCS 2021. Abst GS3-01). However, both trials excluded pts with active/progressive BM. Here we describe a trial evaluating T-DXd in a real-world setting in pts with stable or active BM and pts without BM with previously treated advanced/metastatic HER2+ BC. The data generated by this study will complement previous and ongoing studies, providing a more robust understanding of T-DXd treatment in patients with and without BM. Trial design: DESTINY-Breast12 (NCT04739761) is an open-label, multicenter, international (91 sites in the US, Europe, Australia, Canada, and Japan), phase 3b/4 study assessing the efficacy and safety of T-DXd 5.4 mg/kg every 3 weeks in pts with HER2+ BC ± BM. As part of prescreening, all pts will provide informed consent for tumor tissue samples (archival tumor tissue or fresh biopsy) to be collected and tested for HER2 status. Pts will be enrolled in 1 of 2 cohorts (250 pts each): cohort 1 (no BM at baseline) and cohort 2 (BM at baseline). Pts must have previously treated HER2-positive BC that has progressed on or after ≥1 prior anti-HER2–based regimen (including disease progression ≤6 months after adjuvant treatment with HER2-targeted therapies) and received ≤2 lines of therapy in the metastatic setting (excluding pts with prior tucatinib). Cohort 1 will be limited to include ≤25% third-line pts. Pts with BM must have untreated BM not needing immediate local therapy or previously treated stable or progressing BM. Primary endpoints are ORR in cohort 1 and PFS in cohort 2 (both by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST] version 1.1 per ICR). Secondary endpoints in both cohorts are overall survival, DOR, time to progression, duration of subsequent therapy, PFS2, safety, and changes in symptoms, functioning, and quality of life. Incidence of new symptomatic central nervous system (CNS) metastasis is a secondary endpoint in cohort 1, and ORR and CNS ORR by RECIST 1.1 per ICR, CNS PFS and DOR, and time to new CNS metastasis are secondary endpoints in cohort 2. Citation Format: Nancy U. Lin, Eva Ciruelos, Guy Jerusalem, Volkmar Müller, Naoki Niikura, Giuseppe Viale, Emma Oscroft, Shawn Anand, Manoj Prahladan, Nadia Harbeck. Open-label, phase 3b/4 study of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) in patients with or without baseline brain metastasis with advanced/metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive breast cancer: DESTINY-Breast12 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-16-02.

Introduction: Breast cancer treatment is associated with cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI). However, the differential effect of endocrine therapy (ET) vs chemotherapy followed by endocrine therapy (CET), including the impact of menopausal status, on CRCI is not well understood. Methods: Participants (pts) with hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative breast cancer with 1-3 positive lymph nodes and an Oncotype DX recurrence score of 0-25 enrolled in the RxPONDER trial were randomly assigned to ET alone versus CET. Until the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) accrual goal was reached, English speaking pts in the US were invited to complete HRQoL questionnaires including the 8-item PROMIS Perceived Cognitive Function Concerns (PCF) Short Form questionnaire shortly after randomization (baseline), as well as 6, 12, and 36 months after baseline. Analysis of measures of anxiety and fatigue is presented separately. Standardized T scores (mean 50; SD 10) for PCF were computed with higher scores indicating less cognitive impairment. The primary endpoint of this exploratory analysis was to compare mean PCF T scores by treatment arm and menopausal status. Separately by menopausal status, a generalized estimating equations (GEE) model was fit to the three timepoints adjusting for baseline to estimate the difference between treatment arms and whether there was a time trend over the three follow-up measures. Results: The HRQoL accrual exceeded the goal of 500 patients, with 74% of pts participating voluntarily until the QOL invitation was removed from the protocol (Dec 1, 2012). A total of 139 pre and 429 postmenopausal pts completed the questionnaires at baseline. T scores were similar between ET and CET arms at baseline [Table 1]. In the ET arm, T scores decreased from baseline to 6 and 12 months but recovered to baseline at 36 months. In the CET arm, T scores decreased from baseline to 6 months and 12 months but did not return to baseline at 36 months. The mean score difference between CET and ET over time was -3.02 (p=0.01) and -2.36 (p=0.003) for pre and postmenopausal pts, respectively. Adjusting for baseline, there was no significant time trend over the three follow-up periods for either premenopausal (p=0.12) or postmenopausal (p=0.49) pts. Dropoff occurred over time with 79%, 76%, 60% of pts at baseline participating at 6, 12, and 36 months. Complete endocrine treatment adherence data are not yet available at each timepoint. Conclusion: Chemoendocrine therapy has a greater negative effect on patient-reported CRCI compared to ET alone in both pre- and post-menopausal pts and it is sustained over 36 months. Interventions to prevent or treat CRCI are needed to improve the long-term quality of life of patients treated with CET. Table 1. Comparisons of mean Cognitive Function score by treatment arm and menopausal status. Citation Format: Irene Kang, Jamie K. Forschmiedt, Michelle M. Loch, William E. Barlow, Danika L. Lew, Julie R. Gralow, Funda Meric-Bernstam, Kathy S. Albain, Daniel F. Hayes, Nancy U. Lin, Edith A. Perez, Lori J. Goldstein, Priya Rastogi, Anne F. Schott, Steven Shak, Priyanka Sharma, Jieling Miao, Debu Tripathy, Lajos Pusztai, Gabriel N. Hortobagyi, Kevin Kalinsky, N. Lynn Henry. Patient-reported cognitive impairment in women participating in the RxPONDER trial (SWOG S1007) by menopausal status [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr GS1-04.

Background: With the development of novel antibody drug conjugates (ADC), it is increasingly important to understand the changes that occur in cell-surface targets over time from early-stage to metastatic breast cancer. Discordance in HER2 expression per immunohistochemistry (IHC) has been reported between primary and metastatic tumors in patients (pts) with HER2-negative breast cancer defined per ASCO/CAP guidelines, with both gain and loss of expression described. Representation of HR-negative (TNBC) tumors has been limited in these studies, and HER2 status at multiple time points in TNBC has not been described. Here we report changes in HER2 IHC in patients diagnosed with TNBC, using a collection of matched tumor samples over time. Methods: Pts were identified from two sources: 1) an institutional database including all consecutive pts who underwent surgery for stage I-III breast cancer at Dana-Farber/Brigham Cancer Center between 2015-2018, and 2) a prospective research biopsy protocol for pts with known or suspected metastatic breast cancer. Pts were included in the present analysis if they received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for stage I-III TNBC (eTNBC), or if they were diagnosed with any stage TNBC and ultimately developed metastatic TNBC (mTNBC). Clinical pathology records were reviewed for HER2 IHC results of samples collected at: initial diagnosis (DX); residual disease (RD) post-NAC, if applicable; and at recurrence (M). HER2 IHC was classified as HER2-0 if HER2 IHC 0, and HER2-low if 1+ or 2+ (and ISH non-amplified). For matched comparisons, if IHC was performed in more than one DX sample (e.g., breast, node), only the breast was considered; if more than one M sample, only the first M biopsy with available IHC was considered. Results: Among 110 pts in this cohort, 101 were initially diagnosed with eTNBC (79 received NAC; 22 underwent surgery as first intervention) and 9 with de novo mTNBC. Median age was 48.7 years (range 19.8-71.6). Among all pts, a total of 292 samples (136 DX, 53 RD, 103 M) had available HER2 IHC scores. When restricting to one sample per time point, HER2-low prevalence was 49/102 (48.0%) in DX breast tumors, 21/53 (39.6%) in RD, and 13/58 (22.4%) in first M samples (with all remaining samples HER2-0, except one HER2 3+ sample). In eTNBC pts, HER2 IHC scores were available for 50 paired DX and RD, and 48 paired DX and M samples. Among 50 pts with paired DX and RD, HER2 IHC was discordant in 56% (28/50) (Table 1). Of the 21 HER2-0 DX tumors, 23.8% (5/21) became HER2-low at RD. Of the 29 HER2-low DX tumors, 51.7% (15/29) became HER2-0 at RD. Among 48 eTNBC pts who recurred and had paired DX and M samples, HER2 IHC was discordant in 50% (24/48) (Table 1). Change from HER2-0 to low was 12.5% (3/24), and from HER2-low to HER2-0 was 66.7% (16/24). Among 9 de novo mTNBC pts, 5 had HER2 IHC available in paired DX breast and M prior to starting therapy; 3 were concordant (IHC 0, n=2; IHC 1+, n=1), one had IHC 0 in DX breast and IHC 2+ in M (liver), one had IHC 1+ in DX breast and IHC 0 in M (node). Conclusions: HER2 IHC classification was discordant in about half of the TNBC cases we examined, with more frequent rates of conversion from HER2-low to HER2-0 in both paired DX/RD post-NAC, and paired DX/M samples. Additional analyses will be presented exploring HER2 IHC changes among multiple metastases per patient. Genomic and molecular analysis, including whole exome sequencing, RNA sequencing, and methylation profiling, are underway in these samples to further elucidate HER2 evolutionary dynamics. Citation Format: Ana C. Garrido-Castro, Lan D. Ngo, Edward T. Richardson, Allison Frangieh, Ayesha Mohammed-Abreu, Melissa E. Hughes, Jorge Gomez Tejada Zanudo, John Navarro, Paolo Tarantino, Elizabeth A. Mittendorf, Sara Tolaney, Tari King, Eric Winer, Nancy U. Lin, Nikhil Wagle. HER2-10 Dynamics of HER2-low expression in triple-negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr HER2-10.

Background Breast cancer mortality in women has declined statistically significantly over the past several years. In men, it is unclear whether survival has changed over time. We evaluated changes in breast cancer–specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS) in male breast cancer over the past 3 decades. Methods We evaluated men diagnosed with breast cancer between 1988 and 2017, reported in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry. Patients were categorized into 3 groups by year of diagnosis: 1988-1997, 1998-2007, and 2008-2017. BCSS and OS were estimated by Kaplan-Meier, and differences between groups were compared by log-rank test. Multivariable Cox regression evaluated the independent association of year of diagnosis with BCSS and OS. All tests were 2-sided. Results We included 8481 men. Overall, BCSS at 5 years was 83.69%, 83.78%, and 84.41% in groups 1988-1997, 1998-2007, and 2008-2017, respectively (P = .86). There was no statistically significant difference in BCSS between the 3 groups within each stage of disease. Among all patients, OS at 5 years was 64.61%, 67.31%, and 69.05% in groups 1988-1997, 1998-2007, and 2008-2017, respectively (P = .01). In adjusted Cox models, each additional year of diagnosis had no statistically significant association with BCSS (hazard ratio = 1.00, 95% confidence interval = 0.99 to 1.01, P = .75), but there was statistically significant improvement in OS (hazard ratio = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.98 to 0.99, P = .009). Conclusions Over the past 3 decades, there has been no statistically significant improvement in BCSS in male breast cancer. Changes in OS over time are consistent with increasing life expectancy. Efforts to improve BCSS in male breast cancer are warranted.

Purpose:We previously demonstrated that high levels of circulating methylated DNA are associated with subsequent disease progression in women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). In this study, we evaluated the clinical utility of a novel liquid biopsy-breast cancer methylation (LBx-BCM) prototype assay using the GeneXpert cartridge system for early assessment of disease progression in MBC.Experimental Design:The 9-marker LBx-BCM prototype assay was evaluated in TBCRC 005, a prospective biomarker study, using plasma collected at baseline, week 4, and week 8 from 144 patients with MBC.Results:At week 4, patients with MBC with high cumulative methylation (CM) had a significantly shorter median PFS (2.88 months vs. 6.60 months, P = 0.001) and OS (14.52 months vs. 22.44 months, P = 0.005) compared with those with low CM. In a multivariable model, high versus low CM was also associated with shorter PFS (HR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.20–3.01; P = 0.006). Change in CM from baseline to week 4 (OR, 4.60; 95% CI, 1.77–11.93; P = 0.002) and high levels of CM at week 4 (OR, 2.78; 95% CI, 1.29–5.99; P = 0.009) were associated with progressive disease at the time of first restaging. A robust risk model based on week 4 circulating CM levels was developed to predict disease progression as early as 3 months after initiating a new treatment.Conclusions:The automated LBx-BCM prototype assay is a promising clinical tool for detecting disease progression a month after initiating treatment in women with MBC undergoing routine care. The next step is to validate its clinical utility for specific treatments.

Background: In women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer, the risk of distant recurrence and death persists for at least 20 years (y) from diagnosis. The risk of late mortality in men with HR+ breast cancer has not been reported. The aims of this study were to evaluate long-term risks of breast cancer-specific mortality (BCSM) and non-BCSM in men with stage I-III HR+ breast cancer. In addition, we aimed to identify factors associated with late deaths from breast cancer in men. Methods: Using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program, we identified men diagnosed with stage I-III HR+ breast cancer between 1990-2008. We used cumulative incidence function to estimate the effect of baseline clinical and pathologic variables including age at diagnosis, stage, tumor size (T), nodal status (N), and tumor grade, on cumulative risks of BCSM and non-BCSM over time. We estimated annual rate of events per 100 person-years. We plotted smoothed hazard estimates over time for BCSM by stage and nodal status. Fine and Gray multivariable regression was used to evaluate the association of pre-selected variables with BCSM, conditional on having survived 5 y. Results: We included 2,836 patients (pts) with a median follow-up of 15.41 y. Median age at diagnosis was 67 y (IQR 57-76 y). Stage distribution was: 34.5% stage I, 46% stage II, and 19.5% stage III. The table shows risks of BCSM and non-BCSM and annual event rates by stage, N status, and grade. The cumulative risk of BCSM in y 0-20 was 12.4% for stage I, 26.2% for stage II and 46.0% for stage III. In contrast, the cumulative risk of non-BCSM over the same period ranged from 42.8% in stage III to 52.4% in stage I. Of all BCSM events, the proportion that occurred 0-< 5y, 5-< 10y and ≥10y was: For stage I 22.55%, 50% and 27.45%; For stage II 37.58%, 38.93% and 23.49%, For stage III 49.15%, 31.62% and 19.23%; respectively (p< 0.001). Among pts with stage II breast cancer, we observed a peak in the risk of BCSM at 6 y with a hazard rate of 3%, followed by a minimal decline in risk thereafter. However, among pts with stage III (n=554), and those with N3 (n=160), we observed a risk of BCSM that peaked first at 4-5 y (hazard rates: 6.3% and 9.9% for stage III and N3, respectively) followed by a small decline and then peaked again at 11-12 y (hazard rates: 7.5% and 12.7% for stage III and N3, respectively). In adjusted Fine and Gray regression conditional on having survived 5 y, risks of BCSM were higher for pts aged < 50 y vs >64 y (Hazard ratio [HzR] 1.59; 95% CI, [1.17 – 2.16]), grade III/IV vs grade I (HzR 1.85; 95% CI, [1.22 – 2.79]), and stage III vs stage I (HzR 3.93; 95% CI, [2.93 – 5.26]). Conclusions: In HR+ male breast cancer, risks of BCSM persist for at least 20 y after diagnosis and depend on traditional clinicopathologic factors such as age, tumor stage and tumor grade. Among the relatively small group of men with higher stages of disease, we observed a prolonged risk of BCSM with an early and late peak, which is different from the risk that is reported in women (Leone JP, BCRT 2021). Whether the observed trends in hazards over time reflect biologic differences in tumor characteristics, tumor dormancy, and/or host factors between male and female breast cancer cannot be elucidated from these data. Better adjuvant therapies are warranted to reduce early and late BCSM risks. Risks of BCSM, non-BCSM and annual event rates in men with stage I-III hormone receptor-positive breast cancer Citation Format: Julieta Leone, Michael J. Hassett, Rachel Freedman, Sara Tolaney, Noah Graham, Nabihah Tayob, Carlos T. Vallejo, Eric Winer, Nancy U. Lin, Jose P. Leone. PD6-08 Mortality risks over 20 years in men with stage I-III hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PD6-08.

Background Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is a relatively uncommon manifestation of advanced cancer. Patients with LMD carry a poor prognosis and often decline rapidly, complicating inclusion in clinical trials. Identification of LMD subsets of greater incidence and more favorable prognosis might facilitate dedicated clinical trials in the future. We hypothesized that patients with breast cancer may represent such a population and sought to assess the relative incidence and prognosis of LMD secondary to breast vs. non-breast primaries. Methods We identified 2411 patients with intracranial metastases secondary to breast (N = 501) and non-breast (N = 1910) primaries at Brigham and Women’s Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute between 1996 and 2020, of whom 112 presented with and an additional 161 subsequently developed LMD. A log-rank test and Cox modeling were used to compare outcomes in patients with breast vs. non-breast primaries. Results Among patients with newly diagnosed intracranial disease, the incidence proportion of concurrent LMD was 11.4% vs. 2.9% among patients with breast vs. non-breast primaries (P Conclusions Patients with breast cancer and LMD may represent an ideal population for clinical trials given the higher incidence and potentially more favorable prognosis seen in this population.

Purpose: Brain metastases can occur in up to 50% of patients with metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer. Because patients with active brain metastases were excluded from previous pivotal clinical trials, the central nervous system (CNS) activity of the antibody–drug conjugate trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) is not well characterized. Experimental Design: We studied how T-DXd affects growth and overall survival in orthotopic patient-derived xenografts (PDX) of HER2-positive and HER2-low breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM). Separately, we evaluated the effects of T-DXd in a retrospective cohort study of 17 patients with stable or active brain metastases. Results: T-DXd inhibited tumor growth and prolonged survival in orthotopic PDX models of HER2-positive (IHC 3+) and HER2-low (IHC 2+/FISH ratio < 2) BCBMs. T-DXd reduced tumor size and prolonged survival in a T-DM1–resistant HER2-positive BCBM PDX model. In a retrospective multi-institutional cohort study of 17 patients with predominantly HER2-positive BCBMs, the CNS objective response rate (ORR) was 73% (11/15) while extracranial response rate was 45% (5/11). In the subset of patients with untreated or progressive BCBM at baseline, the CNS ORR was 70% (7/10). The median time on treatment with T-DXd was 8.9 (1.3–16.2) months, with 42% (7/17) remaining on treatment at data cutoff. Conclusions: T-DXd demonstrates evidence of CNS activity in HER2-positive and HER2-low PDX models of BCBM and preliminary evidence of clinical efficacy in a multi-institution case series of patients with BCBM. Prospective clinical trials to further evaluate CNS activity of T-DXd in patients with active brain metastases are warranted. See related commentary by Soffietti and Pellerino, p. 8

PURPOSE To examine the prevalence and dynamics of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and its association with metastatic recurrence in patients with high-risk early-stage hormone receptor–positive breast cancer (HR+ BC) more than 5 years from diagnosis. METHODS We enrolled 103 patients with high-risk stage II-III HR+ BC diagnosed more than 5 years prior without clinical evidence of recurrence. We performed whole-exome sequencing (WES) on primary tumor tissue to identify somatic mutations tracked via a personalized, tumor-informed ctDNA test to detect minimal residual disease (MRD). We collected plasma at the time of consent and at routine visits every 6-12 months. Patients were followed for clinical recurrence. RESULTS In total, 85 of 103 patients had sufficient tumor tissue; of them, 83 of 85 (97.6%) patients had successful whole-exome sequencing. Personalized ctDNA assays were designed targeting a median of 36 variants to test 219 plasma samples. The median time from diagnosis to first sample was 8.4 years. The median follow-up was 10.4 years from diagnosis and 2.0 years from first sample. The median number of plasma samples per patient was two. Eight patients (10%) had positive MRD testing at any time point. Six patients (7.2%) developed distant metastatic recurrence, all of whom were MRD-positive before overt clinical recurrence, with median ctDNA lead time of 12.4 months. MRD was not identified in one patient (1.2%) with local recurrence. Two of eight MRD-positive patients had not had clinical recurrence at last follow-up. CONCLUSION In this prospective study, in patients with high-risk HR+ BC in the late adjuvant setting, ctDNA was identified a median of 1 year before all cases of distant metastasis. Future studies will determine if ctDNA-guided intervention in patients with HR+ BC can alter clinical outcomes.

Background Patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2-positive) cancers have a high incidence of central nervous system (CNS) spread, but unfortunately systemic trastuzumab which targets the HER2 receptor has little CNS penetration. The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum-tolerated dose of intrathecal trastuzumab and its efficacy in patients with HER2-positive leptomeningeal disease (LMD). Methods This multicenter study enrolled 34 LMD patients in a combined phase I/II study in treating patients with intrathecal trastuzumab. Any HER2-positive histology was allowed in the phase I; the phase II was limited to HER2-positive breast cancer. Results Intrathecal trastuzumab was well-tolerated, with one dose limiting toxicity of grade 4 (arachnoiditis) occurring at the 80 mg twice weekly dose. The recommended phase II dose was 80 mg intrathecally twice weekly. Twenty-six patients at dose level 80 mg were included in evaluation for efficacy: partial response was seen in 5 (19.2%) patients, stable disease was observed in 13 (50.0%), and 8 (30.8%) of the patients had progressive disease. Median overall survival (OS) for phase II dose treated patients was 8.3 months (95% CI 5.2–19.6). The phase II HER2-positive breast cancer patients median OS was 10.5 months (95% CI 5.2–20.9). Pharmacokinetic (PK) studies were limited in the setting of concurrent systemic trastuzumab administration, however, did show stable cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations with repeated dosing suggest that trastuzumab does not accumulate in the CSF in toxic concentrations. Conclusion This study suggests promise for potentially improved outcomes of HER-positive LMD patients when treated with intrathecal trastuzumab while remaining safe and well-tolerated for patients.

Background It is unclear whether diabetes and glycemic control affects the outcomes of breast cancer, especially among those with metastatic disease. This study aims to determine the impact of diabetes and hyperglycemia on cancer progression and mortality in individuals with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Methods Patients with a diagnosis of MBC between 2010 and 2021 were identified using the MBC database at 2 academic institutions. We evaluated the effects of diabetes and glycemic control on overall survival (OS) and time to next treatment (TTNT). Results We compared 244 patients with diabetes (median age 57.6 years) to 244 patients without diabetes (matched for age, sex, ethnicity, and receptor subtype). OS at 5 years [diabetes: 54% (95% CI 47-62%) vs controls: 56% (95% CI 49-63%), P = 0.65] and TTNT at 1 year [diabetes: 43% (95% CI 36-50%) vs controls: 44% (95% CI 36-51%), P = 0.33] were similar between groups. A subgroup analysis comparing those with good glycemic control and those with poor glycemic control among patients with specific receptor subtype profiles showed no differences in OS at 5 years or TTNT at 1 year. In an 8-year landmark subgroup analysis, there was worse OS among individuals with diabetes compared to controls, and OS was found to be better among those with good glycemic control compared to those with poor control. Conclusions Diabetes was not associated with increased mortality in individuals with MBC at 5 years. However, diabetes and hyperglycemia were associated with worse OS among a cohort of longer-term survivors. These findings suggest that individualized diabetes and glycemic goals should be considered in patients with MBC.

Brain metastases occur commonly in patients with advanced solid malignancies. Yet, less is known about brain metastases than cancer-related entities of similar incidence. Advances in oncologic care have heightened the importance of intracranial management. Here, in this consensus review supported by the Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO), we review the landscape of brain metastases with particular attention to management approaches and ongoing efforts with potential to shape future paradigms of care. Each coauthor carried an area of expertise within the field of brain metastases and initially composed, edited, or reviewed their specific subsection of interest. After each subsection was accordingly written, multiple drafts of the manuscript were circulated to the entire list of authors for group discussion and feedback. The hope is that the these consensus guidelines will accelerate progress in the understanding and management of patients with brain metastases, and highlight key areas in need of further exploration that will lead to dedicated trials and other research investigations designed to advance the field.

In the OlympiA study, 1 year of adjuvant olaparib significantly extended invasive disease-free survival and overall survival. The benefit was consistent across subgroups, and this regimen is now recommended after chemotherapy for germline BRCA1/2 mutation (gBRCA1/2m) carriers with high-risk, HER2-negative early breast cancer. However, the integration of olaparib in the landscape of agents currently available in the post(neo)adjuvant setting—ie, pembrolizumab, abemaciclib, and capecitabine—is challenging, as there are no data suggesting how to select, sequence, and/or combine these therapeutic approaches. Furthermore, it is unclear how to best identify additional patients who could benefit from adjuvant olaparib beyond the original OlympiA criteria. Since it is unlikely that new clinical trials will answer these questions, recommendations for clinical practice can be made through indirect evidence. In this article, we review available data that could help guide treatment decisions for gBRCA1/2m carriers with high-risk, early-stage breast cancer.

PURPOSE To evaluate the clinical patterns of utilization of OncotypeDX Recurrence Score (RS) in early-stage, hormone receptor–positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative breast cancer (BC) at an academic center with previously established internal reflex testing guidelines. METHODS RS testing in accordance with preexisting reflex criteria and predictors of utilization outside of reflex criteria were retrospectively analyzed for the years 2019-2021 in a quality improvement evaluation. Patients were grouped according to OncotypeDX testing within (cohort A) or outside (cohort B) of predefined criteria which included a cap at age older than 65 years. RESULTS Of 1,687 patients whose tumors had RS testing, 1,087 were in cohort A and 600 in cohort B. In cohort B, nearly half of patients were older than 65 years (n = 279; IQR, 67-72 years). For patients older than 65 years, those with RS testing were younger (median age: 69 v 73 years), with higher grade cancers (G2-3: 84.9% v 54.7%) and were more likely to be treated with chemotherapy (15.4% v 4.1%). Issues for implementation of RS testing in older patients were identified, including potential structural barriers related to the current policy on the reimbursements of genomic tests. CONCLUSION Internal guidelines may facilitate standardized utilization of the RS in early-BC. Our data suggest that clinicians preferred broader utilization of RS across the age spectrum, with therapeutically important consequences. Modifying the current policy for reimbursement of RS testing and in internal reflexive testing criteria for those older than 65 years is warranted.

Prior authorization (PA) is a type of utilization review that health insurers apply to control service delivery, payments, and reimbursements of health interventions. The original stated intent of PA was to ensure high-quality standards in treatment delivery while encouraging evidence-based and cost-effective therapeutic choices. However, as currently implemented in clinical practice, PA has been shown to affect the health workforce, adding administrative burden to authorize needed health interventions for patients and often requiring time-consuming peer-to-peer reviews to challenge initial denials. PA is presently required for a wide range of interventions, including supportive care medicines and other essential cancer care interventions. Patients who are denied coverage are commonly forced to receive second-choice options, including less effective or less tolerable options, or are exposed to financial toxicity because of substantial out-of-pocket expenditures, affecting patient-centric outcomes. The development of tools informed by national clinical guidelines to identify standard-of-care interventions for patients with specific cancer diagnoses and the implementation of evidence-based clinical pathways as part of quality improvement efforts of cancer centers have improved patient outcomes and may serve to establish new payment models for health insurers, thereby also reducing administrative burden and delays. The definition of a set of essential interventions and guidelines- or pathways-driven decisions could facilitate reimbursement decisions and thus reduce the need for PAs. Structural changes in how PA is applied and implemented, including a redefinition of its real need, are needed to optimize patient-centric outcomes and support high-quality care of patients with cancer.