Search

Objective: We examine levels of candidate blood‐based biomarkers (CBBs) in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) treated with tofacitinib. Methods: Patients with JIA who participated in clinical trial NCT02592434 received tofacitinib from baseline to week 18. Serial serum samples were assayed for CBBs (S100A8/9, S100A12, interleukin‐18 [IL‐18], serum amyloid A, resistin, vascular endothelial growth factor, angiopoietin‐1, angiopoietin‐2, matrix metalloproteinase 8 [MMP8], MMP2, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 1, leptin, chemokine [C‐X‐C motif] ligand 9, soluble IL‐2 receptor, intercellular adhesion molecule 1, soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor, IL‐6, IL‐23, monocyte chemotactic protein 1, chemokine [C‐C motif] ligand 18 [CCL18], and CCL20). Association of CBBs with JIA response to treatment from baseline to week 18 were assessed. Results: This study included 166 patients with polyarticular‐course JIA. Paired serum samples from 143 patients were available at both baseline and week 18. Thirty‐five percent (50 of 143) of patients had a JIA‐American College of Rheumatology 90 (JIA‐ACR90) level improvement, whereas 90, 121, and 137 (63%, 85%, and 96%) achieved JIA‐ACR70, 50, and 30 improvement at week 18. Despite small numerical differences by JIA category, there were no baseline CBB values that independently predicted a decrease in Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score (JADAS‐27) or JIA‐ACR90 response by week 18. Decrease in resistin level (baseline to week 18) was significantly associated with week 18 improvement in JADAS‐27 and JIA‐ACR90 response after adjusting for age, sex, JIA disease duration, and baseline resistin (r2 0.79, SE 0.070, P < 0.01, and odds ratio [95% confidence interval] 1.134 [1.018–1.264]). HLA‐B27 positivity was significantly associated with not achieving a JIA‐ACR90 response at week 18 (P = 0.0097). Conclusion: Among the CBBs included, only resistin was significantly associated with treatment response, and no CBB was identified that forecasts JIA improvement after initiation of tofacitinib. The association of HLA‐B27 positivity with lower response to tofacitinib in JIA is intriguing and merits further study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective To uniquely classify children with microscopic polyangiitis (MPA), to describe their demographic characteristics, presenting clinical features, and initial treatments in comparison to patients with granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener's) (GPA). Methods The European Medicines Agency (EMA) classification algorithm was applied by computation to categorical data from patients recruited to the ARChiVe (A Registry for Childhood Vasculitis: e-entry) cohort, with the data censored to November 2015. The EMA algorithm was used to uniquely distinguish children with MPA from children with GPA, whose diagnoses had been classified according to both adult- and pediatric-specific criteria. Descriptive statistics were used for comparisons. Results In total, 231 of 440 patients (64% female) fulfilled the classification criteria for either MPA (n = 48) or GPA (n = 183). The median time to diagnosis was 1.6 months in the MPA group and 2.1 months in the GPA group (ranging to 39 and 73 months, respectively). Patients with MPA were significantly younger than those with GPA (median age 11 years versus 14 years). Constitutional features were equally common between the groups. In patients with MPA compared to those with GPA, pulmonary manifestations were less frequent (44% versus 74%) and less severe (primarily, hemorrhage, requirement for supplemental oxygen, and pulmonary failure). Renal pathologic features were frequently found in both groups (75% of patients with MPA versus 83% of patients with GPA) but tended toward greater severity in those with MPA (primarily, nephrotic-range proteinuria, requirement for dialysis, and end-stage renal disease). Airway/eye involvement was absent among patients with MPA, because these GPA-defining features preclude a diagnosis of MPA within the EMA algorithm. Similar proportions of patients with MPA and those with GPA received combination therapy with corticosteroids plus cyclophosphamide (69% and 78%, respectively) or both drugs in combination with plasmapheresis (19% and 22%, respectively). Other treatments administered, ranging in decreasing frequency from 13% to 3%, were rituximab, methotrexate, azathioprine, and mycophenolate mofetil. Conclusion Younger age at disease onset and, perhaps, both gastrointestinal manifestations and more severe kidney disease seem to characterize the clinical profile in children with MPA compared to those with GPA. Delay in diagnosis suggests that recognition of these systemic vasculitides is suboptimal. Compared with adults, initial treatment regimens in children were comparable, but the complete reversal of female-to-male disease prevalence ratios is a provocative finding. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There are over 100 rheumatic diseases and approximately 300,000 children with a pediatric rheumatic disease (PRD) in the United States (U.S.). The most common PRDs are juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (cSLE), and juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM). Effective and safe medications are essential because there are generally no cures for these conditions. Etanercept was the first biologic therapy for the treatment of JIA, approved in 1999. Since then, other biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and targeted synthetic DMARD (tsDMARDs) blocking relevant immunological pathways have been approved for the treatment of JIA, resulting in a marked improvement of disease prognosis. Conversely, there is only one bDMARD that has been approved for cSLE, but none are approved for the treatment of JDM. Lack of approved therapeutic options, with established dosing regimens and known efficacy and safety, remains a central challenge in the treatment of all PRDs, including autoinflammatory diseases, and for complications of PRDs. This review provides an overview of bDMARD and tsDMARD treatments studied for the treatment of various subtypes of JIA, summarizes information from bDMARD studies in other pediatric rheumatic diseases, with a focus on pivotal trials that led to regulatory approvals and highlights improved outcomes in JIA with the use of these newer medications. Further, we outline barriers and challenges in the treatment of other PRDs. Lastly, we summarize the current regulatory landscape for bDMARD studies and medication approvals in PRDs., (This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To determine s.c. tocilizumab (s.c.-TCZ) dosing regimens for systemic JIA (sJIA) and polyarticular JIA (pJIA)., Methods: In two 52-week phase 1 b trials, s.c.-TCZ (162 mg/dose) was administered to sJIA patients every week or every 2 weeks (every 10 days before interim analysis) and to pJIA patients every 2 weeks or every 3 weeks with body weight ≥30 kg or <30 kg, respectively. Primary end points were pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety; efficacy was exploratory. Comparisons were made to data from phase 3 trials with i.v. tocilizumab (i.v.-TCZ) in sJIA and pJIA., Results: Study participants were 51 sJIA patients and 52 pJIA patients aged 1-17 years who received s.c.-TCZ. Steady-state minimum TCZ concentration (Ctrough) >5th percentile of that achieved with i.v.-TCZ was achieved by 49 (96%) sJIA and 52 (100%) pJIA patients. In both populations, pharmacodynamic markers of disease were similar between body weight groups. Improvements in Juvenile Arthritis DAS-71 were comparable between s.c.-TCZ and i.v.-TCZ. By week 52, 53% of sJIA patients and 31% of pJIA patients achieved clinical remission on treatment. Safety was consistent with that of i.v.-TCZ except for injection site reactions, reported by 41.2% and 28.8% of sJIA and pJIA patients, respectively. Infections were reported in 78.4% and 69.2% of patients, respectively. Two sJIA patients died; both deaths were considered to be related to TCZ., Conclusion: s.c.-TCZ provides exposure and risk/benefit profiles similar to those of i.v.-TCZ. S.c. administration provides an alternative administration route that is more convenient for patients and caregivers and that has potential for in-home use., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, http://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01904292 and NCT01904279., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology.)

Objective: To evaluate safety and effectiveness of adalimumab (ADA) in polyarticular-course juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) in the STRIVE registry., Methods: STRIVE enrolled patients with polyarticular-course JIA into 2 arms based on treatment with methotrexate (MTX) alone or ADA with/without MTX (ADA ± MTX). Adverse events (AEs) per 100 patient-years of observation time were analyzed by registry arm. Patients who entered the registry within 4 weeks of starting MTX or ADA ± MTX, defined as new users, were evaluated for change in disease activity assessed by the 27-joint Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score with the C-reactive protein level (JADAS-27 CRP )., Results: At the 7-year cutoff date (June 1, 2016), data from 838 patients were available (MTX arm n = 301, ADA ± MTX arm n = 537). The most common AEs were nausea (10.3%), sinusitis (4.7%), and vomiting (4.3%) in the MTX arm and arthritis (3.9%), upper respiratory tract infection (3.5%), sinusitis, tonsillitis, and injection site pain (3.0% each) in the ADA ± MTX arm. Rates of serious infection were 1.5 events/100 patient-years in the MTX arm and 2.0 events/100 patient-years in the ADA ± MTX arm. AE and serious AE rates were similar in patients receiving ADA with versus without MTX. No deaths or malignancies were reported. New users in the ADA ± MTX arm showed a trend toward lower mean JADAS-27 CRP compared with new users in the MTX arm in the first year of STRIVE., Conclusion: The STRIVE registry 7-year interim results support the idea that ADA ± MTX is well tolerated by most children. Registry median ADA exposure was 2.47 (interquartile range 1.0-3.6) years, with 42% of patients continuing ADA at the 7-year cutoff date., (© 2019 AbbVie Inc. Arthritis Care & Research published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American College of Rheumatology.)

Background: This study aimed to assess long-term safety and developmental data on juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients treated in routine clinical practice with celecoxib or nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (nsNSAIDs)., Methods: Children aged ≥2 to <18 years with rheumatoid-factor-positive or -negative polyarthritis, persistent or extended oligoarthritis, or systemic arthritis were enrolled into this prospective, observational, multicenter standard-of-care registry. Eligible patients were newly or recently prescribed (≤6 months) an nsNSAID or celecoxib. Enrolled patients were followed to the end of the study, whether they remained on the original NSAID, switched, or discontinued therapy altogether. All adverse events (AEs) regardless of severity were captured in the database., Results: A total of 274 patients (nsNSAID, n = 219; celecoxib, n = 55) were observed for 410 patient-years of observation. Naproxen, meloxicam, and nabumetone were the most frequently used nsNSAIDs. At baseline, the celecoxib group was older, had a numerically longer median time since diagnosis, and a numerically higher proportion of patients with a history of gastrointestinal-related NSAID intolerance. AEs reported were those frequently observed with NSAID treatment and were similar across groups (nsNSAIDs: 52.0%; celecoxib: 52.9%). Twelve unique patients experienced a total of 18 serious AEs; the most frequent were infections, and none was attributed to NSAID use., Conclusions: The safety profile of celecoxib and nsNSAIDs appears similar overall. The results from this registry, ongoing pharmacovigilance, and the phase 3 trial that led to the approval of celecoxib for children with JIA provide evidence that the benefit-risk for celecoxib treatment in JIA remains positive., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00688545.