Search

Pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma (PASC) is a rare variant of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The usual treatment for metastatic or recurrent PASC is systemic chemotherapy in accordance with the PDAC treatment strategy. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of chemotherapy, especially the benefit of recent combination therapies, in patients with metastatic or recurrent PASC.We conducted a multicenter retrospective analysis of 116 patients with metastatic or recurrent PASC treated with first-line chemotherapy between April 2001 and December 2017 at 24 Japanese institutions.Combination chemotherapies included gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel (GnP, n = 28), fluorouracil/leucovorin + irinotecan + oxaliplatin (FFX, n = 10), gemcitabine + S-1 (GS, n = 10), and others (n = 9). Monotherapies included gemcitabine (n = 51) and S-1 (n = 8). The median overall survival (OS) was 6.5, 7.3, and 4.3 months for the whole cohort, the combination therapy group, and the monotherapy group, respectively. Multivariate analysis indicated that combination therapy showed a better trend in OS than monotherapy (hazard ratio = 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.38-1.20). GnP or FFX were selected in 58.7% of patients after FFX was approved in Japan, and revealed a median OS, median progression-free survival, and objective response rate of 7.3 months, 2.8 months, and 26.9% in GnP and 7.2 months, 2.3 months, and 20.0% in FFX respectively.This study suggests that combination therapy may be more effective than monotherapy. GnP and FFX showed similar and clinically meaningful efficacy for patients with metastatic or recurrent PASC.

Pancreatic cancer has the poorest prognosis among digestive cancers. During the 1990s, the 5-year survival rate of surgical patients with pancreatic cancer was 14% in Japan. However, survival rates have increased to 40% in the 2020s due to the refinement of surgical procedures and the introduction of perioperative chemotherapy. Several pivotal randomized controlled trials have played an indispensable role to establish each standard treatment strategy. Resectability of pancreatic cancer can be classified into resectable, borderline resectable, and unresectable based on the anatomic configuration, and multidisciplinary treatment strategies for each classification have been revised rapidly. Investigation of superior perioperative adjuvant treatments for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer and the establishment of optimal conversion surgery for unresectable pancreatic cancer are the progressive subjects.

Cabozantinib showed a favorable benefit-risk profile in Japanese patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in an open-label, phase 2 study (NCT03586973). This analysis presents cumulative data to final database lock.Patients with previously treated, advanced HCC received cabozantinib 60 mg/day. Progression-free survival (PFS) and tumor response rates in prior-sorafenib and sorafenib-naïve cohorts were assessed by independent radiology committee (IRC) and an investigator. Liver function was evaluated by albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score.Median cabozantinib exposure was 5.6 months. In the prior-sorafenib cohort (n = 20), median PFS was 7.4 months per IRC assessment and 5.6 months per investigator assessment. In the sorafenib-naïve cohort (n = 14), median PFS was 3.6 months and 4.4 months per IRC and investigator assessment, respectively. Six-month PFS rate per IRC and investigator assessment in the prior-sorafenib cohort was 59.8% and 49.5%, respectively, and in the sorafenib-naïve cohort was 16.7% and 35.7%, respectively. Disease control rate by both IRC and investigator assessment was 85.0% in the prior-sorafenib cohort and 64.3% in the sorafenib-naïve cohort. Median overall survival (Kaplan-Meier estimate) was 19.3 months and 9.9 months in the prior-sorafenib and sorafenib-naïve cohort, respectively. Mean ALBI score remained relatively constant in patients able to continue treatment. The most frequent adverse events were palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome, diarrhea, hypertension, and decreased appetite. No new safety concerns were identified.Cabozantinib showed efficacy and a manageable safety profile in Japanese patients with advanced HCC. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Purpose: FGFR2 amplification is associated with poor prognosis in advanced gastric cancer and its subclonal heterogeneity has been revealed. Here, we examined whether circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) was useful for detecting FGFR2 amplification and co-occurring resistance mechanisms in advanced gastric cancer. Experimental Design: We assessed genomic characteristics of FGFR2-amplified advanced gastric cancer in a nationwide ctDNA screening study. We also analyzed FGFR2 amplification status in paired tissue and plasma samples with advanced gastric cancer. In addition, we examined patients with FGFR2-amplified advanced gastric cancer identified by ctDNA sequencing who received FGFR inhibitors. Results: FGFR2 amplification was more frequently detected by ctDNA sequencing in 28 (7.7%) of 365 patients with advanced gastric cancer than by tissue analysis alone (2.6%–4.4%). FGFR2 amplification profiling of paired tissue and plasma revealed that FGFR2 amplification was detectable only by ctDNA sequencing in 6 of 44 patients, which was associated with a worse prognosis. Two patients in whom FGFR2 amplification was detected by ctDNA sequencing after tumor progression following previous standard chemotherapies but not by pretreatment tissue analysis had tumor responses to FGFR inhibitors. A third patient with FGFR2 and MET co-amplification in ctDNA showed a limitation of benefit from FGFR inhibition, accompanied by a marked increase in the MET copy number. Conclusions: ctDNA sequencing identifies FGFR2 amplification missed by tissue testing in patients with advanced gastric cancer, and these patients may respond to FGFR inhibition. The utility of ctDNA sequencing warrants further evaluation to develop effective therapeutic strategies for patients with FGFR2-amplified advanced gastric cancer.

Purpose: Given the promising activity and tolerability of FOLFIRINOX as a second-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC), it can be an attractive first-line treatment option as well. Materials and Methods: This is a single-arm, open-label, multicenter phase II study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of FOLFIRINOX as a first-line treatment for patients with advanced BTC. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), tumor response and safety. This study defined primary endpoint might be met when the lower limit value of 80% confidence interval [CI] of the median PFS ≥ 6.0 months. Results: Between June 2016 and March 2020, 35 BTC patients (21 intrahepatic, 10 extrahepatic, 2 gallbladder, 2 ampulla) including 26 unresectable and 9 recurrent disease were enrolled. After a median follow-up of 13.9 months, the median PFS and OS were 7.4 (80% CI, 5.5-7.5) and 14.7 (80% CI, 11.8-15.7) months, respectively. Complete response was achieved in 1 (2.9%) and partial response in 10 (28.6%), giving an objective response rate of 31.4% and disease control rate of 74.3%. Major grade 3-4 adverse events included neutropenia (54.3%), leukopenia (34.4%), febrile neutropenia (17.1%), thrombocytopenia (8.6%), cholangitis (8.6%), anemia, nausea, diarrhea, and peripheral sensory neuropathy (2.9% each). Conclusion:.FOLFIRINOX was well tolerable in patients with advanced BTC, however, this study did not meet the primary endpoint to conduct a phase III trial. Thus, further explorations are required to find a subset of patients and/or certain clinical scenario which might be beneficial from FOLFIRINOX.

Etoposide plus cisplatin (EP) and irinotecan plus cisplatin (IP) are commonly used as community standard regimens for advanced neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC).To identify whether EP or IP is a more effective regimen in terms of overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced NEC of the digestive system.This open-label phase 3 randomized clinical trial enrolled chemotherapy-naive patients aged 20 to 75 years who had recurrent or unresectable NEC (according to the 2010 World Health Organization classification system) arising from the gastrointestinal tract, hepatobiliary system, or pancreas. Participants were enrolled across 50 institutions in Japan between August 8, 2014, and March 6, 2020.In the EP arm, etoposide (100 mg/m2/d on days 1, 2, and 3) and cisplatin (80 mg/m2/d on day 1) were administered every 3 weeks. In the IP arm, irinotecan (60 mg/m2/d on days 1, 8, and 15) and cisplatin (60 mg/m2/d on day 1) were administered every 4 weeks.The primary end point was OS. In total, data from 170 patients were analyzed to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.67 (median OS of 8 and 12 months in inferior and superior arms, respectively) with a 2-sided α of 10% and power of 80%. The pathologic findings were centrally reviewed following treatment initiation.Among the 170 patients included (median [range] age, 64 [29-75] years; 117 [68.8%] male), median OS was 12.5 months in the EP arm and 10.9 months in the IP arm (HR, 1.04; 90% CI, 0.79-1.37; P = .80). The median progression-free survival was 5.6 (95% CI, 4.1-6.9) months in the EP arm and 5.1 (95% CI, 3.3-5.7) months in the IP arm (HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.78-1.45). A subgroup analysis of OS demonstrated that EP produced more favorable OS in patients with poorly differentiated NEC of pancreatic origin (HR, 4.10; 95% CI, 1.26-13.31). The common grade 3 and 4 adverse events in the EP vs IP arms were neutropenia (75 of 82 [91.5%] patients vs 44 of 82 [53.7%] patients), leukocytopenia (50 of 82 [61.0%] patients vs 25 of 82 [30.5%] patients), and febrile neutropenia (FN) (22 of 82 [26.8%] patients vs 10 of 82 [12.2%] patients). While incidence of FN was initially high in the EP arm, primary prophylactic use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor effectively reduced the incidence of FN.Results of this randomized clinical trial demonstrate that both EP and IP remain the standard first-line chemotherapy options. Although AEs were generally manageable, grade 3 and 4 AEs were more common in the EP arm.Japan Registry of Clinical Trials: jRCTs031180005; UMIN Clinical Trials Registry: UMIN000014795.

Objectives Neoadjuvant therapy followed by radical resection improves the borderline-resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) prognosis; however, the optimal therapeutic regimen remains unclear. Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) showed a high anti-tumor effect in primary lesions in a prospective study for metastatic disease. However, evidence concerning its feasibility is still lacking in patients with BRPC. We therefore evaluated the tolerability of neoadjuvant GnP (NAC-GnP) for BRPC. Patients and Methods This single-center prospective study evaluated 10 patients with BRPC who were treated with two cycles of NAC-GnP. The primary endpoint was feasibility for NAC-GnP. Treatment feasibility was defined as a successful outcome in at least eight patients. Results Ten patients who had BRPC in contact with the celiac artery (n = 5), superior mesenteric artery (n = 3), or hepatic artery (n = 2) were enrolled. The median age was 75 (range, 40-82) years old. Grade 3 anorexia and grade 2 pneumonia occurred in one patient each, so treatment was feasible in eight patients. The median primary tumor reduction and response rates were 33% (range, 0%-68%) and 60%, respectively. Six of eight patients who had abnormal CA19-9 levels at the time of enrolment showed a decrease in CA19-9 levels, with a median decrease of 72%. Five patients underwent radical resection, including R0 resection in four. Postoperative grade IIIa Clavien-Dindo complications occurred in one patient (upper gastrointestinal bleeding and pancreatic fistula). Conclusion Two-cycle NAC-GnP is a feasible treatment for patients with BRPC. Further studies on NAC-GnP in patients with BRPC are warranted.

Trastuzumab deruxtecan (DS-8201) is an antibody-drug conjugate composed of a humanized monoclonal anti-HER2 antibody, a cleavable tetrapeptide-based linker and a potent topoisomerase I inhibitor. The drug's efficacy has been proven in HER2-positive breast and gastric cancers. The rate of HER2 positivity in biliary tract cancer (BTC) has been reported to be 5-20%, and case reports and clinical trials have suggested that HER2 inhibitors might be active in HER2-positive BTC. Here we describe the rationale and design of the phase II HERB trial that will evaluate the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients with HER2-expressing unresectable or recurrent BTC. The primary end point will be the centrally assessed objective response rate in HER2-positive patients.Trastuzumab deruxtecan (DS-8201) is a new drug against HER2, a receptor on cell membranes that has sensitivity to targeted inhibitors. The drug’s efficacy has been proven in HER2-positive breast and gastric cancers. Some studies have suggested that HER2 inhibitors might be active in HER2-positive biliary tract cancers. This article describes the design of a new clinical trial. The HERB trial is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients with HER2-expressing biliary tract cancers. Clinical trial registration: JMA-IIA00423.

PURPOSE Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) genotyping may guide targeted therapy for patients with advanced GI cancers. However, no studies have validated ctDNA genotyping for microsatellite instability (MSI) assessment in comparison with a tissue-based standard. PATIENTS AND METHODS The performance of plasma-based MSI assessment using Guardant360, a next-generation sequencing–based ctDNA assay, was compared with that of tissue-based MSI assessment using a validated polymerase chain reaction–based method in patients with advanced GI cancers enrolled in GOZILA study, a nationwide ctDNA profiling study. The primary end points were overall percent agreement, positive percent agreement (PPA), and negative percent agreement. The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy was also evaluated. RESULTS In 658 patients with advanced GI cancers who underwent both plasma and tissue testing for MSI, the overall percent agreement, PPA, and negative percent agreement were 98.2% (95% CI, 96.8 to 99.1), 71.4% (95% CI, 47.8 to 88.7), and 99.1% (95% CI, 98.0 to 99.7), respectively. In patients whose plasma samples had a ctDNA fraction ≥ 1.0%, the PPA was 100.0% (15/15; 95% CI, 78.2 to 100.0). Three patients with MSI-high (MSI-H) tumors detected only by ctDNA genotyping achieved clinical benefits after receiving anti–programmed cell death 1 therapy with the progression-free survival ranging from 4.3 to 16.7 months. One patient with an aggressive cancer of an unknown primary site benefited from pembrolizumab after rapid detection of MSI-H by ctDNA genotyping. CONCLUSION ctDNA genotyping was able to detect MSI with high concordance to validated tissue-based MSI testing, especially in patients with tumors that have sufficient ctDNA shedding. Furthermore, ctDNA genotyping enabled identification of patients with MSI-H tumors who benefited from immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment.

Irinotecan (CPT-11) is metabolized to an active metabolite 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (SN-38) by carboxylesterase (CES). SN-38 is then converted to the inactive metabolite SN-38 glucuronide (SN-38G) by glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 (UGT1A1). Genetic polymorphisms in UGT1A1 have been associated with altered SN-38 pharmacokinetics, which increase the risk of toxicity in patients. CPT-11 is also converted to 7-ethyl-10-[4-N-(5-aminopentanoic acid)-1-piperidino]carbonyloxycamptothecin (APC) and 7-ethyl-10-(4-amino-1-piperidino) carbonyloxycamptothecin (NPC) by cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A), and this route also affects the plasma concentration of SN-38. We evaluated the activities of UGT1A1, CYP3A, and CES and the factors affecting the pharmacokinetics of plasma SN-38 in patients with UGT1A1 gene polymorphisms. Three male patients aged 56, 65, and 49 years were recruited for the analysis. All patients had pancreatic cancer, received FOLFIRINOX, and had UGT1A1*6/*6 (patients 1 and 3) or *6/*28 (patient 2) genetic polymorphisms. The rate constants for evaluating the enzyme activity were determined from the measured plasma concentration of CPT-11 and its metabolites using a two-compartment model by WinNonlin. The area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC) of SN-38 was patient 1 > patient 2 > patient 3. The rate constants obtained from the model analysis indicated the respective enzyme activities of UGT1A1 (k57), CYP3A (k13 + k19), and CES (k15). The order of values for UGT1A1 activity was patient 2 > patient 3 > patient 1. Since UGT1A1 activity was low in patient 1 with a high AUC of SN-38, it can be said that the increase in plasma concentration was due to a decrease in UGT1A1 activity. Conversely, the order of values for CYP3A and CES activities was patient 3 > patient 1 > patient 2 and patient 2 > patient 1 > patient 3, respectively. Patient 3 had the lowest AUC of SN-38, caused by a lower level of CES activity and increased CYP3A activity. In this study, we indicated that the plasma AUC of SN-38 and AUC ratio of SN-38G/SN-38 may depend on changes in the activities of CYP3A, CES, and UGT1A1. Using pharmacokinetic analysis, it is possible to directly evaluate enzyme activity and consider what kind of enzyme variation causes the increase in the AUC of SN-38.

548 Background: Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) include gallbladder cancer (GBC), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC), extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EHCC), and ampulla of Vater cancer (AV). Although it was previously reported that there were differences in clinical features individually, the reported data were limited to data from some subgroup analyses of recent randomized controlled trials. JCOG1113 (UMIN000010667) showed the non-inferiority of gemcitabine plus S-1 to gemcitabine plus cisplatin in terms of overall survival (OS) in patients (pts) with advanced BTCs. We aimed to compare clinical features among the primary sites of BTCs using JCOG1113 data. Methods: Among the 354 pts enrolled in JCOG1113, 352 pts were included in this analysis except for 2 pts without BTCs. We compared the patient characteristics and treatment outcomes, such as OS, progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR), among the four primary sites. Results: Of the 352 pts, 137 pts (38.9%), 94 pts (26.7%), 108 pts (30.7%) and 13 pts (3.7%) had GBC, IHCC, EHCC, and AV, respectively. GBC was more common in females (58.4%) than males, in contrast to the other primary sites. The percentage of pts with metastatic disease for GBC was the highest (78.1%) and involved multiple metastatic organs (41.6%), in contrast with the other primary sites. The median OS for GBC, IHCC, EHCC and AV were 12.6 months (reference), 15.7 months (hazard ratio [HR]; 0.749, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.559-1.005), 16.3 months (0.704, 0.532-0.934) and 11.5 months (1.148, 0.633-2.080), respectively. The median PFS for GBC, IHCC, EHCC and AV were 5.7 months (reference), 6.2 months (0.843, 0.644-1.104), 8.7 months (0.636, 0.489-0.826) and 4.1 months (1.506, 0.851-2.665), respectively. The ORRs for GBC, IHCC, EHCC and AV were 34.4%, 28.9%, 34.4%, and 0.0%, respectively. Conclusions: Except for AV which included a few patients in this trial, GBC showed a poorer prognosis compared with the other primary sites. Furthermore, it was more likely to include metastatic disease and multiple metastases, and this is likely one of the causes of the poorer prognosis. [Table: see text]

732 Background: S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine derivative, is standard adjuvant therapy in Japanese patients with resected biliary tract cancer (BTC), based on the results of JCOG1202, a phase III trial evaluating adjuvant S-1 following curative resection for BTC compared to surgery alone. The efficacy of 5-FU-based therapy is related to the expression of enzymes involved in 5-FU metabolic pathways, such as thymidylate synthase (TS), thymidine phosphorylase (TP), orotate phosphoribosyltransferase (OPRT) and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD). The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of messenger RNA (mRNA) levels of the four 5-FU metabolic pathway genes on the outcomes of patients enrolled in JCOG1202. Methods: Tumor cell RNA was isolated from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded primary BTC specimens resected in 264 of 440 randomized patients in JCOG1202. The four 5-FU metabolic pathway genes were measured in 183 patients (surgery alone: n = 94; adjuvant S-1: n = 89) who were randomly divided to training (n = 96) or validation set (n = 87). The endpoints of interest were the predictive values of the four genes for the efficacy of adjuvant S-1 on overall survival and relapse-free survival (RFS), and we here report the results regarding RFS. Cut-off levels for mRNA expression were selected in the training set which minimized the bootstrap p-values (2,000 samples) of an interaction term of treatment (surgery alone or S-1) and mRNA expression in a Cox regression model. Results: There were no obvious differences in each mRNA level and clinical characteristics between surgery alone and adjuvant S-1 groups. RFS tended to be better with adjuvant S-1 (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.790, [95% confidence interval: 0.524-1.192]) compared to surgery alone, which was maintained in the low DPD population (HR = 0.440 [0.216-0.898] in training set and 0.748 [0.334-1.675] in validation set), in the low TP population (HR = 0.709 [0.388-1.296] and 0.602 [0.287-1.262]), and in the high OPRT population (HR = 0.520 [0.152-1.779] and 0.609 [0.161-2.304]). Conclusions: The efficacy of adjuvant S-1 on RFS was representative in BTC patients with intratumoral gene expressions of low DPD, low TP, and high OPRT, which was disappeared in the population with high DPD, high TP, and low OPRT. These biomarkers might be useful to predict therapeutic benefits with S-1 containing chemotherapy for BTC.

682 Background: Pancreatic cancer and especially late-line chemotherapy often negatively impact patient quality of life (QoL). However, QoL outside of the date of hospital visits has not been adequately evaluated. This study assessed QoL at home in patients receiving chemotherapy using electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePRO). Methods: This multicenter prospective observational study was conducted in 29 Japanese centers. Pathologically confirmed unresectable pancreatic cancer patients who were going to receive a second cycle of second-line chemotherapy, liposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil/leucovorin (nal-IRI+FF), gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GEM+nab-PTX), or gemcitabine alone (GEM) at the outpatient department were included. QoL was assessed by electronic instruments on days 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 11 of each administration during two consecutive cycles (second and third cycles). The primary outcome was the index value of EuroQol 5-dimensions 5-levels (EQ-5D-5L). Secondary outcomes were the status of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)-QLQ-C30 and Patient-Reported Outcome Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE). Results: A total of 90 patients, 56 receiving nal-IRI+FF, 27 receiving GEM+nab-PTX, and 7 receiving GEM, were eligible for this study. The patients who responded to at least the first questionnaire and received nal-IRI+FF (n = 46) or GEM+nab-PTX (n = 16) were selected for analysis. In the nal-IRI+FF group, the mean index value of EQ-5D-5L on day 1 of the second cycle was 0.803±0.142, declined up to day 6 (0.678±0.247), and had recovered by day 1 of the third cycle (0.776±0.197). Similar trends were observed in the third cycle; the nadir of the mean index value was 0.723±0.182 on day eight and had recovered by day 15 (0.782±0.159). On the other hand, in the GEM+nab-PTX group, the nadir of the mean index value in the second cycle was on day 6 of the third administration (0.751±0.184) and had not fully recovered by day 1 of the third cycle (0.789±0.182). For global health status according to EORTC-QLQ-C30, a similar trend to EQ-5D-5L was observed in both groups. According to the results of the PRO-CTCAE, pain (40.4%), diarrhea (36.5%), abdominal pain (30.8%), fatigue (28.8%), and anorexia (28.8%) were frequent severe or very severe adverse events in the nal-IRI+FF group. In comparison, diarrhea (29.2%) and anorexia (25.0%) were frequent severe or very severe adverse events in the GEM+nab-PTX group. Conclusions: QoL assessed by ePRO outside the date of hospital visits revealed the pattern or details of QoL transition. Further study is needed so that these trends can be taken into account in the management of chemotherapy. Clinical trial information: UMIN000044245 .

494 Background: LAT1 is a transporter ( SLC7A5) of L-type amino acid. Overexpression in cancer cells supports aggressive proliferation. High expression of LAT1 in tumor specimens has been identified as a predictor of poor prognosis in patients with various cancer types, including BTC. The efficacy and safety of nanvuranlat (JPH203), a first-in-class, single agent that selectively inhibits LAT1, was evaluated in patients with pretreated, advanced, refractory BTC in a placebo-controlled randomized trial. Methods: Patients with four different subtypes of advanced BTC were enrolled: intrahepatic (IHC), extrahepatic (EHC), gallbladder (GBC) and ampulla of Vater (AVC). All were refractory to or intolerant of standard chemotherapy and other investigational medicines. Patients were pre-classified as non-rapid acetylators via N-acetyltransferase 2 ( NAT2), to maximize efficacy/safety by minimizing the metabolism of nanvuranlat. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), assessed by blinded independent center review (BICR), using RECIST 1.1. Results: At data cut-off (February 28, 2022), 211 BTC patients were consented at 14 centers in Japan. Using NAT2 testing for classification, a total of 106 patients were randomized (2:1) to nanvuranlat (n = 70) or placebo (n = 36). Nanvuranlat met its primary endpoint and demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in PFS by BICR in comparison with the placebo group (Hazard Ratio = 0.557; 95% CI, 0.3435 – 0.9029; one-sided p = 0.0164). The disease control rate (DCR) in the nanvuranlat group was approximately 25% (average = 24.6%) across all BTC subtypes, while it was 11.4% in the placebo group. Grade 3 adverse events were reported in 30.0% for nanvuranlat vs 22.9% for placebo. Treatment-related adverse event rates were respectively 41.4% and 57.1% in the nanvuranlat and placebo groups. No patient had adverse events leading to nanvuranlat treatment discontinuation, dose reduction, or death. Conclusions: The study met the primary endpoint. LAT1 inhibitor monotherapy with nanvuranlat demonstrated useful clinical efficacy in patients with four different subtypes of pre-treated, advanced, refractory BTC. Safe and highly tolerated profile was also documented. Clinical trial information: UMIN000034080 .

425 Background: Blocking immune checkpoint (IC) pathways, particularly mediated by PD1 and PDL1, has attracted great attention as a promising strategy for treating gastrointestinal cancer. However, the clinical responses are low in many cases, and thus a new treatment strategy and its biomarker are urgently needed for improving the clinical outcome. Blocking other IC molecules, including LAG3, has been evaluated in many clinical trials, while the therapeutic efficacy and the predictive biomarkers remains to be determined due to the same issues as anti-PD1/PDL1 therapy. Methods: We analyzed soluble LAG3 (sLAG3) in sera by ELISA, and LAG3+ cells by flow cytometry, using fresh peripheral blood (PB) obtained from 91 patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) before and about one month after nivolumab monotherapy (2 courses) in the WJOG10417GTR study, according to the protocol approved by the IRB (August 2018 - November 2020). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between high/low groups divided by the cutoff value determined by visually assessing the continuous trend and change point of log hazard ratios obtained by applying penalized splines to each molecular marker. This study was supported by ONO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD. and Bristol Myers Squibb. Results: Posttreatment values were significantly more associated with patients’ prognosis rather than baseline values, and the sLAG3-high group showed significantly shorter PFS/OS as compared to the low group divided by the median: median PFS (mPFS) 51.5 vs 95.5 days (HR = 2.04, P = 0.002), and median OS (mOS) 188 vs 393 days (HR = 1.81, P = 0.032). Patients with high levels of LAG3+ PBCs after treatment showed worse prognosis as compared to those with low levels divided by the cutoff values: a CD3+CD4+LAG3+ T-cell subset, mPFS 43 vs 72 days (HR = 2.23, P = 0.015) and mOS 178 vs 282 days (HR = 1.56, P = 0.249); a CD3+CD8+LAG3+ T-cell subset, mPFS 57 vs 69 days (HR = 1.89, P = 0.012) and mOS 228 vs 303 days (HR = 1.40, P = 0.233); and a CD56+LAG3+ NK subset, mPFS 57 vs 88 days (HR = 2.15, P = 0.003) and mOS 217 vs 409 days (HR = 1.88, P = 0.031). Patients with sLAG3-high/CD56+LAG3+ NK-high levels showed markedly worse prognosis than those with low/low levels (mPFS-HR = 10.55, P < 0.001; and mOS-HR = 4.59, P < 0.001). Conclusions: Patients with posttreatment high levels of sLAG3 and LAG3+ cells in PB showed poor prognosis of AGC patients after the nivolumab therapy, suggesting that these are useful predictive biomarkers. LAG3 may be a promising target in immunotherapy for AGC. Clinical trial information: UMIN000032686 .

Background Hepatectomy is standard treatment for colorectal liver metastases; however, it is unclear whether liver metastases from other primary cancers should be resected or not. The Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery therefore created clinical practice guidelines for the management of metastatic liver tumors. Methods Eight primary diseases were selected based on the number of hepatectomies performed for each malignancy per year. Clinical questions were structured in the population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes (PICO) format. Systematic reviews were performed, and the strength of recommendations and the level of quality of evidence for each clinical question were discussed and determined. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to assess evidence and make recommendations. Results The eight primary sites were grouped into five categories based on suggested indications for hepatectomy and consensus of the guidelines committee. Fourteen clinical questions were devised, covering five topics: (1) diagnosis, (2) operative treatment, (3) ablation therapy, (4) the eight primary diseases, and (5) systemic therapies. The grade of recommendation was strong for one clinical question and weak for the other 13 clinical questions. The quality of the evidence was moderate for two questions, low for 10, and very low for two. A flowchart was made to summarize the outcomes of the guidelines for the indications of hepatectomy and systemic therapy. Conclusions These guidelines were developed to provide useful information based on evidence in the published literature for the clinical management of liver metastases, and they could be helpful for conducting future clinical trials to provide higher-quality evidence.

This phase 1b trial evaluated the toxicity and efficacy of S-1, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin combination therapy (S-IROX) as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (APC).Patients aged 20-75 years with APC and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 were eligible to receive escalating doses of S-1 (60 or 80 mg msup2/sup·day) on days 1-7, fixed doses of oxaliplatin (85 mg/msup2/sup) biweekly, and escalating doses of irinotecan (150, 165, or 180 mg/msup2/sup) once every 2 weeks. In the dose-escalation cohort, a 3 + 3 design was used to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and explore the recommended dose (RD). A dose-expansion cohort was added to further evaluate the safety and efficacy of the combination. This trial was registered at UMIN-CTR (UMIN000012054).Approximately 47 patients were enrolled, of whom 45 were eligible for the analysis. The MTD was not determined, but the RD was determined to be dose level 1 based on a review of data from each level. Among the 45 patients, the ORR was 51.1% [95% confidence interval (CI), 35.8-66.3%]. The median progression-free survival and median overall survival was 6.9 months (95% CI, 5.1-8.8 months) and 15.8 months (95% CI, 9.8-20.8 months), respectively. Common adverse events included neutropenia, elevated liver enzyme levels, diarrhoea, and nausea.The S-IROX regimen showed promising efficacy with manageable toxicities in Japanese patients with APC. A randomised phase 2/3 trial comparing S-IROX, mFOLFIRINOX, and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel is currently ongoing (jRCTs031190009).

Background Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) has been a standard treatment for unresectable pancreatic cancer (uPC); however, the current treatment status and usefulness in older adults with uPC remain unclear. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the patient background and compare the efficacy and safety of GnP versus other treatments in older adults with uPC. Patients and Methods In this prospective observational study, we enrolled 233 eligible patients aged ≥76 years with pathologically proven, clinically uPC, and no history of chemotherapy from 55 Japanese centers during September 2018-September 2019. The main endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. Geriatric assessments were performed upon registration and after 3 months. To adjust for confounders, we conducted propensity score-matched analyses. Results GnP, gemcitabine alone (Gem), best supportive care, and other therapies were administered to 116, 72, 16, and 29 patients, respectively. In the propensity score-matched analysis, 42 patients each were selected from the GnP and Gem groups. The median OS was longer in the GnP group than in the Gem group (12.2 vs. 9.4 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.65; 95% CI, 0.37-1.13). The median PFS was significantly longer in the GnP group than in the Gem group (9.2 vs. 3.7 months; HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.23-0.64). The incidence of severe adverse events was higher with GnP than with Gem; however, the difference was not significant. Conclusion GnP is more efficacious than Gem in patients aged ≥76 years with uPC despite demonstrating a higher incidence of severe adverse events.

This open-label first-in-human study evaluated JPH203, which is a novel selective L-type amino acid transporter 1 inhibitor. We also evaluated the association between the N-acetyltransferase 2 phenotype and outcomes. Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors received daily intravenous JPH203 treatment for 7 days, followed by a 21-day rest period, at escalating doses of 12–85 mg/m2. Dose-limiting toxicities were evaluated during the first cycle using a 3 + 3 design. The study enrolled 17 patients, although grade 3 liver dysfunction was detected in one of six patients receiving 60 mg/m2 and in the first patient to receive 85 mg/m2. Further enrollment was terminated and the maximum tolerated dose was defined as 60 mg/m2. The AUC∞ increased between 12 mg/m2 and 25 mg/m2, although no differences were observed at 25–40 mg/m2. Partial response was observed for one patient with biliary tract cancer (BTC) at the 12 mg/m2 dose, and disease control was achieved by 3 of 6 patients at the 12 mg/m2 and 25 mg/m2 dose levels. Based on these results, we recommend a phase II dose of 25 mg/m2. The disease control rate for BTC was 60%. Two patients with grade 3 liver dysfunction had the rapid N-acetyltransferase 2 phenotype, and disease control was more common for the non-rapid phenotype (50% vs. 12.5%). It appears that JPH203 was well-tolerated and provided promising activity against BTC. The N-acetyltransferase 2 phenotype might help predict the safety and efficacy of JPH203. Clinical trial registration: UMIN000016546.

Background/aim Amino acids are among the most important nutrients for supplying energy and building protein blocks in cancers. L-type amino acid transporter (LAT) 1 is known to play a critical role in cancer growth. We have completed the first-in-human phase I study using the LAT1-specific inhibitor JPH203. Patients and methods We evaluated plasma free amino acids (PFAAs), body mass index (BMI), and efficacy of JPH203 in patients enrolled in the phase I study. Results LAT1-substrate PFAAs and branched chain amino acids (BCAAs) were higher in patients with biliary tract cancer (BTC) than in those with other cancers. High inhibition of uptake of LAT1-substrate PFAAs was associated with survival. BMI of more than the median was associated with disease control and survival. BCAAs tended to be associated with BMI. Conclusion BCAAs and BMI are useful predictors of the efficacy of JPH203, which shows promising activity against BTC.

Background Gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) is the standard treatment of advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC); however, it causes nausea, vomiting, and anorexia, and requires hydration. Gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) reportedly has equal to, or better, efficacy and an acceptable toxicity profile. We aimed to confirm the non-inferiority of GS to GC for patients with advanced/recurrent BTC in terms of overall survival (OS). Patients and methods We undertook a phase III randomized trial in 33 institutions in Japan. Eligibility criteria included chemotherapy-naive patients with recurrent or unresectable BTC, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 0−1, and adequate organ function. The calculated sample size was 350 with a one-sided α of 5%, a power of 80%, and non-inferiority margin hazard ratio (HR) of 1.155. The primary end point was OS, while the secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR), adverse events (AEs), and clinically significant AEs defined as grade ≥2 fatigue, anorexia, nausea, vomiting, oral mucositis, or diarrhea. Results Between May 2013 and March 2016, 354 patients were enrolled. GS was found to be non-inferior to GC [median OS: 13.4months with GC and 15.1months with GS, HR, 0.945; 90% confidence interval (CI), 0.78–1.15; P=0.046 for non-inferiority]. The median PFS was 5.8months with GC and 6.8months with GS (HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.70–1.07). The RR was 32.4% with GC and 29.8% with GS. Both treatments were generally well-tolerated. Clinically significant AEs were observed in 35.1% of patients in the GC arm and 29.9% in the GS arm. Conclusions GS, which does not require hydration, should be considered a new, convenient standard of care option for patients with advanced/recurrent BTC. Clinical Trial number This trial has been registered with the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm), number UMIN000010667.

Recent developments in systemic chemotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma have been outstanding. However, reports on conversion surgery after lenvatinib therapy are scarce. We present the first case of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with tumor thrombus in the suprahepatic vena cava close to the right atrium, which shrank after 12 weeks’ administration of lenvatinib, thereby leading to successful conversion surgery without using total vascular exclusion or extracorporeal circulation. The treatment strategy for hepatocellular carcinoma with macroscopic hepatic vein tumor thrombus is controversial, however, from a Japanese nationwide survey, surgical resection has been accepted as one of the treatment options for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with hepatic vein tumor thrombus in Japan. However, the survival rate after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma having inferior vena cava tumor thrombus with extracorporeal circulation was reported to be worse than without extracorporeal circulation, and some preoperative down-sizing therapy for inferior vena cava tumor thrombus was advocated. Preoperative lenvatinib therapy might be a promising option among the multidisciplinary treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma with macroscopic tumor thrombus in the hepatic veins.

Brain metastasis post-curative gastrectomy for early-stage gastric cancer is extremely rare. We present herein, a case of solitary brain metastasis that developed 4 years post-curative surgery for early-stage gastric cancer. A 60-year-old man had early-stage gastric cancer 4 years prior to presentation and underwent laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with lymph node dissection. The pathological TNM classification was T1b (submucosal) N0M0. He underwent scheduled examinations and had no recurrence. 4 years postoperatively, he presented to the emergency department with sudden onset of nausea, vomiting, and inability to speak clearly. Brain computed tomography revealed a 17-mm nodule in the right cerebral hemisphere and midline shift. The tumor could not be radically resected for anatomical reasons, and incisional biopsy was performed for histological examination. Histological examination confirmed the diagnosis of a poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma from the previous gastric cancer. Gamma knife radiosurgery and chemotherapy were scheduled. 28 months after brain metastasis, multiple liver and lung metastases appeared. The patient died 30 months after developing brain metastasis. Brain metastasis may occur during long-term follow-up even after curative resection of early-stage gastric cancer. In patients with a history of gastric cancer and neurological symptoms, brain metastasis should be considered.

Malignant tumors in the sinonasal region are rare and account for only 0.2–0.8% of all cancers and 1–3% of all head and neck carcinomas. Among the confirmed cases, the involvement of the sphenoid sinus is even rarer, accounting for only 2–3% of paranasal sinus tumors (Osguthorpe et al., 1994; Esposito et al., 2006; DeMonte et al., 2000). Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the sphenoid sinus as a primary lesion is very rare; due to its rarity, no standard treatment has been established. Staining for thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1) has been shown to be useful in the definite diagnosis of primary lung tumors. However, cases of TTF-1-positive small-cell neuroendocrine carcinomas that did not originate in the lung have been reported in the literature. Herein, we report the case of a patient with TTF-1-positive small-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the sphenoid sinus as the primary lesion and multiple bone metastases; to the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of such a case. A 52-year-old woman presented with complains of numbness and pain that extended from the left cheek to the lower lip and continued for 2 months. Head magnetic resonance imaging showed a neoplastic lesion in the left sphenoid sinus. We performed a transnasal endoscopic tumor biopsy; based on the results of pathological and immunohistochemical examination, a diagnosis of TTF-1-positive neuroendocrine carcinoma of the left sphenoid sinus with multiple bone metastases was made. Despite treatment with Cyberknife therapy and chemotherapy, the patient died approximately 12 months after treatment initiation. The findings of this case may help elucidate the significance of TTF-1-positive cells in small-cell neuroendocrine carcinomas.

We assessed genomic characteristics ofctDNA sequencing identifies

4006 Background: BTCs have an aggressive tumor biology with limited treatment options. With a HER2-positivity rate of 5–20% in BTCs, case series and small clinical trials have shown signs of activity for HER2 blockade in these pts. T-DXd is an antibody-drug conjugate composed of a humanized monoclonal anti-HER2 antibody, a cleavable linker, and a topoisomerase I inhibitor. The HERB trial is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, single-arm phase 2 trial of T-DXd in pts with HER2-expressing BTCs. Methods: Centrally confirmed HER2-expressing (HER2-positive: IHC3+ or IHC2+/ISH+, and HER2-low-expressing [HER2-low]: IHC/ISH status of 0/+, 1+/-, 1+/+, or 2+/-) pts with BTCs who were refractory or intolerant to gemcitabine containing regimen received 5.4 mg/kg of T-DXd every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was the confirmed objective response rate (ORR) in HER2-positive pts by independent central review. The sample size of 22 had 80% power with one-sided alpha error of 5%; threshold ORR, 15%; and expected ORR, 40%. The ORR, disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) in HER2-positive/-low pts, and incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were assessed as secondary endpoints. Results: A total of 32 pts, 24 with HER2-positive and 8 with HER2-low BTCs, received T-DXd. Twenty-two pts with HER2-positive, excluding 2 ineligible pts, were identified for primary efficacy analysis. Among the 22 pts, IHC3+ and IHC2+/ISH+ were 45.5% and 54.5%, primary sites: gallbladder/extrahepatic/intrahepatic/Vater were 11/6/3/2, median number of prior regimens was 2 (range, 1–4). The confirmed ORR in HER2-positive pts was 36.4% (8/22; 2 CR and 6 PR; 90% CI, 19.6–56.1), indicating statistically significant improvement in ORR (P = 0.01). The DCR, median (m) PFS, mOS were 81.8% (95% CI, 59.7–94.8), 4.4 months (mo) (95% CI, 2.8–8.3), 7.1 mo (95% CI, 4.7–14.6), respectively. In addition, encouraging efficacy were seen even in HER2-low pts; ORR, DCR, mPFS, and mOS were 12.5% (1/8; 1 PR; 95% CI, 0.3–52.7), 75.0% (95% CI, 34.9–96.8), 4.2 mo (95% CI, 1.3–6.2), and 8.9 mo (95% CI, 3.0–12.8), respectively. In the safety analysis set (n = 32), TEAEs of > = grade (G) 3 occurred in 81.3% (26/32); the common TEAEs were anemia (53.1%), neutropenia (31.3%), and leukopenia (31.3%). TEAEs leading to drug discontinuation occurred in 8 pts (25.0%). Eight pts (25.0%) had interstitial lung disease (ILD; G1/G2/G3/G5 were 3/1/2/2) not adjudicated by an independent committee. Conclusions: T-DXd showed promising activity in pts with HER2-expressing BTCs. Although the safety profile was generally consistent with other T-DXd studies, ILD, an important identified risk of T-DXd, requires more careful monitoring and intervention. These results support further exploration of T-DXd in this patient population. Clinical trial information: JMA-IIA00423.

Studies have indicated an association between UDP-glucuronosyltransferase-1A1 (UGT1A1) genetic polymorphisms and irinotecan-induced toxicity. We undertook this study to investigate the association between UGT1A1 genetic polymorphisms and toxicity in patients treated with the FOLFIRINOX (comprising oxaliplatin, irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin) chemotherapy regimen in the JASPAC 06 study. Patients screened for UGT1A1*6 and UGT1A1*28, and treated with either the original FOLFIRINOX (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 , irinotecan 180 mg/m2 , leucovorin 200 mg/m2 , bolus 5-fluorouracil [5-FU] 400 mg/m2 , and continuous 5-FU 2400 mg/m2 ) or a modified FOLFIRINOX (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 , irinotecan 150 mg/m2 , leucovorin 200 mg/m2 , and continuous 5-FU 2400 mg/m2 ) as first-line chemotherapy were included. Of 199 patients eligible for this analysis, 79 patients were treated with the original FOLFIRINOX regimen and 120 patients were treated with the modified FOLFIRINOX regimen. In the original FOLFIRINOX group, 54 were UGT1A1 WT, and 25 were UGT1A1 heterozygous type (-/*6, 12 patients; -/*28, 13 patients). In the modified FOLFIRINOX group, 64 were UGT1A1 WT and 56 were UGT1A1 heterozygous type (-/*6, 33 patients; -/*28, 23 patients). In the original FOLFIRINOX group, the incidence of diarrhea was significantly higher among patients with UGT1A1 heterozygous type than among those with UGT1A1 WT and the incidence of leukopenia and diarrhea was significantly higher among patients with UGT1A1 -/*6 than among those with UGT1A1 -/*28. Patients with UGT1A1 heterozygous type, especially those with UGT1A1 -/*6, tended to show a higher incidence rate of severe adverse events, but this was not statistically significant. However, for patients who received the modified FOLFIRINOX, there was no difference in the frequency of adverse events due to UGT1A1 status. In conclusion, patients with heterozygous UGT1A1 polymorphisms treated with the original FOLFIRINOX regimen experienced severe toxicity more frequently than patients with WT UGT1A1.

TPS627 Background: Pancreatic cancer is one of the most dismal cancers with few effective drugs. Both FOLFIRINOX (FFX) and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) showed superiority in overall survival (OS) to gemcitabine in phase III studies and became the standard of care for first-line chemotherapy. However, to date, there is no prospective randomized controlled studies comparing FFX and GnP. In addition, the original FFX has the problems of high toxicity and complicated administration, and we have been developing modified FFX with dose reduction of irinotecan and without bolus fluorouracil and S-IROX, which replaces continuous intravenous fluorouracil with orally administered fluoropyrimidine of S-1. The modified FFX showed median OS of 11.2months [95% confidence interval (CI), 9.0-not calculated] as good as the original FFX in a phase II study, and the S-IROX showed a high objective response rate (ORR) of 57.1% (95% CI, 34.0–78.2%) in a phase I study. This phase II/III study aims to confirm the superiority of modified FFX and S-IROX to GnP in metastatic or recurrent pancreatic cancer. Methods: The main eligibility criteria are metastatic or recurrent pancreatic cancer, histologically diagnosed as adenocarcinoma or adenosquamous carcinoma, no prior chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status 0 or 1, and age 20-75 years old. Enrolled patients are randomized 1:1:1 to GnP, modified FFX, or S-IROX. GnP is consisted of nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m2) and gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) on days 1, 8, and 15, every 4 weeks, modified FFX is consisted of oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2), irinotecan (150 mg/m2), l-leucovorin (200 mg/m2), and fluorouracil (2400 mg/m2, 46-hour continuous infusion), every 2 weeks, and S-IROX is consisted of oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2), irinotecan (150 mg/m2) and S-1 (80 mg/m2, days 1-7), every 2 weeks. All regimens are administered until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint of the phase II part is the ORR to S-IROX with the null hypothesis of a threshold ORR of less than 20%, which decide whether to proceed to the phase III part in three arms or two arms (GnP and modified FFX). The primary endpoint of the phase III part is OS, and secondary endpoints are progression-free survival, ORR, incidence of adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs, and dose intensity. We calculated a sample of 732 patients to maintain 80% power at a one-sided alpha error of 2.5% in each comparison, and the hazard ratios of modified FFX and S-IROX versus GnP were estimated at 0.73 each. The study started patient accrual in April 2019 and 349 patients have been enrolled as of September 2021. Clinical trial registry: jRCTs031190009. Clinical trial information: jRCTs031190009.

280 Background: Combination of ramucirumab (RAM) + weekly paclitaxel (PTX) is recommended as a standard second-line therapy for unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer (GC). A recent phase II trial evaluating nab-PTX and RAM combination showed that nab-PTX+RAM is promising efficacy and tolerability as well as PTX+RAM. In subgroup analysis of another phase III trial (ABSOLUTE) comparing different nab-PTX scheduling with PTX, weekly nab-PTX was especially effective for the patients with peritoneal dissemination compared to PTX without RAM combination. Therefore, we hypothesized that nab-PTX+RAM would be more effective than PTX+RAM for patients with peritoneal dissemination. Methods: The P-SELECT trial (WJOG10617G) is an open-label randomized phase II study evaluating the safety and efficacy of PTX+RAM and nab-PTX+RAM in GC patients with peritoneal metastasis. Key eligibility criteria were: 1) histologically proven adenocarcinoma, 2) unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer, 3) peritoneal dissemination, 4) intolerance or refractory to first-line therapy including fluoropyrimidines, 5) PS 0–2. Peritoneal dissemination was confirmed by either contrast enema/enterography, CT scan, clinical signs, or operative findings (including exploratory laparoscopy). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), ascites control rate, safety, and neuropathy-specific quality of life. 105 subjects were required to maintain the power of ≥70% expecting the hazard ratio (HR) of 0.90 in OS. The study was conducted in 58 centers of the West Japan Oncology Group. Results: A total of 105 patients (median age 67; M:F 66:39) were randomized (53 patients in PTX+RAM and 52 in nab-PTX+RAM). Moderate and massive amount of ascites was observed in 39.0% of patients. Median OS was 8.1 months in PTX+RAM and 7.2 months in nab-PTX+RAM (HR 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67–1.61, P = 0.63). Median PFS was 5.1 months in PTX+RAM and 3.9 months in nab-PTX+RAM (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.69–1.56, P = 0.89). The ORR and DCR for PTX+RAM and nab-PTX+RAM were 20.7% vs. 20.0% (P = 0.99) and 77.4% vs. 63.5% (P = 0.15), respectively. The ascites control rate was 86.1% in PTX+RAM and 70.3% in nab-PTX+RAM (P = 0.07). The incidence of grade 3/4 neuropathy was higher in nab-PTX+RAM (7.5% vs 17.6%, P = 0.14), whereas there was no difference in neuropathy-specific quality of life between the two groups. The incidence of febrile neutropenia was higher in PTX+RAM (11.3% vs 5.9%, P = 0.49). Conclusions: The potential difference in efficacies between nab-PTX+RAM and PTX+RAM was not shown in advanced gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination. The results of the pre-planned translational research will be available soon. Clinical trial information: jRCTs031180022.

Background Chemoradiotherapy is a treatment option for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. However, the efficacy of induction chemotherapy prior to chemoradiotherapy is uncertain. The aim of this randomized, multicentre phase II study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of chemoradiotherapy with and without induction chemotherapy to determine the significance of induction chemotherapy. Methods Patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer were randomly assigned to the chemoradiotherapy arm (Arm A) or induction chemotherapy followed by the chemoradiotherapy arm (Arm B). Patients in Arm A underwent radiotherapy with concurrent S-1. Patients in Arm B received induction gemcitabine for 12 weeks, and thereafter, only patients with controlled disease underwent the same chemoradiotherapy as Arm A. After chemoradiotherapy, gemcitabine was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity in both arms. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Results Amongst 102 patients enrolled, 100 were eligible for efficacy assessment. The probability of survival was greater in Arm B in the first 12 months, but the trend was reversed in the following periods (1-year survival 66.7 vs. 69.3%, 2-year survival 36.9 vs. 18.9%). The hazard ratio was 1.255 (95% confidence interval 0.816–1.930) in favour of Arm A. Gastrointestinal toxicity was slightly more frequent and three treatment-related deaths occurred in Arm A. Conclusions This study suggested that the chemoradiotherapy using S-1 alone had more promising efficacy with longer-term survival, compared with induction gemcitabine followed by chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Clinical trial registration The study was registered at the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry as UMIN000006811.

Background Data on FOLFIRINOX as a second-line chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer are limited. In the JASPAC06 study—a nationwide, multicenter, observational study—FOLFIRINOX for patients with unresectable or recurrent pancreatic cancer as any line of treatment showed favorable efficacy and safety in Japanese clinical practice. Methods We performed exploratory analyses of patients with unresectable or recurrent pancreatic cancer who received FOLFIRINOX as the second-line chemotherapy in Japanese clinical settings. Results Of the 399 evaluable patients, 44 were eligible for inclusion in the analysis. The patients’ characteristics were as follows: median age, 62 years; men, 26 (59%); Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-Performance status 0/1, 30 (68%)/14 (32%); disease status, recurrent/local/metastatic: 4 (9%)/8 (18%)/32 (73%). The initial dose was reduced in 28 (64%) patients. The median time to treatment failure and number of cycles were 4.5 (range, 0.2–19.1) months and 6 cycles (range, 1–13 or more), respectively. The major grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia in 29 (66%), leucopenia in 17 (39%), anorexia in 7 (16%), febrile neutropenia in 5 (11%), and anemia in 5 (11%) patients. The median overall survival, progression-free survival, and 1-year survival rates were 10.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.2–13.3), 4.1 (95% CI, 2.6–5.5) months, and 30%, respectively. Conclusion Our findings suggest that FOLFIRINOX as a second-line chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer was effective in patients with a good performance status. It displayed toxicity similar to that observed with its use as a first-line treatment.