Search

Cryptococcal meningitis (CM) is an opportunistic infectious disease that occurs in immunocompromised hosts, not only in patients living with HIV, but also in patients without HIV. The evidence regarding the treatment for CM in patients without HIV is mainly found in small retrospective studies and is extremely limited.In the present study, we compared the efficacy of liposomal amphotericin B (L-AMB) alone and in combination with flucytosine (5-FC) for the induction treatment of CM in patients without HIV.Data were gathered from the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database obtained from hospitals throughout Japan. The study included 517 patients without HIV but having CM who fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria. We analysed the average effect of adding 5-FC to L-AMB treatment using the survival time within 14 days of the diagnosis after adjustment of the baseline clinical characteristics with associations with both selections of the treatment and the prognosis.A total of 146 and 217 CM patients received L-AMB and L-AMB with 5-FC, respectively, within 7 days of diagnosis. L-AMB with 5-FC showed better prognosis than L-AMB on day 14 (mortality 6% vs. 11%, hazard ratio, 0.5775; 95% confidence interval, 0.2748-1.213; p = 0.1, Wald test).From the results of this real-world database study, we revealed that the combination therapy of 5-FC on L-AMB for induction therapy might have an advantage on the survival time of NHNT patients with CM as well as PLHIV patients with CM.

Background Nelfinavir, an orally administered inhibitor of human immunodeficiency virus protease, inhibited the replication of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in vitro. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of nelfinavir, we conducted a randomized controlled trial. Methods Adult patients testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection within 3 days were eligible for the study if they had no or mild symptoms of coronavirus disease 2019. Exclusion criteria included the followings: onset of symptoms ≥ 8 days before enrollment; oxygen saturation of 95% or less on room air; and vaccinated patients. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive oral nelfinavir 750 mg (×3 times daily) combined with standard-of-care or standard-of-care alone. The primary endpoint was the time to clearance of SARS-CoV-2. Saliva was collected every day and viral load was measured by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). Nelfinavir was administered for 14 days. However, the treatment could be discontinued by the decision of investigator, if patients had 2 consecutive negative test results by qRT-PCR. Clinical course and safety information were collected through day 28. The study is registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (number, jRCT2071200023). Results Between July 2020 and October 2021, 123 patients (63 in the nelfinavir group and 60 in the control group) were enrolled into the study and included in the analysis. The median time to viral clearance was 8.0 (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.0 to 12.0) days in the nelfinavir group and 8.0 (95% CI 7.0 to 10.0) days in the control group without statistically significant difference between the treatment group (hazard ratio 0.815, 95% CI 0.563 to 1.182; P = 0.1870). Adverse events were reported in 47 (74.6%) patients in the nelfinavir group and 20 (33.3%) in the control group. The most common adverse events in the nelfinavir group were diarrhea (49.2%) and nausea (6.3%). Conclusion Nelfinavir did not reduce the time to viral clearance in this setting. Disclosures Shigeru Kohno, n/a, Pfizer: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Honoraria Taiga Miyazaki, n/a, Pfizer: Advisor/Consultant|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Honoraria.

Background Baloxavir marboxil (baloxavir) is a single-dose, oral antiinfluenza drug with a novel mechanism of action. We compared the incidence of hospitalization in patients treated with baloxavir vs neuraminidase inhibitors. Methods In this retrospective, observational, cohort study, we used real-world patient data extracted from a Japanese health insurance claims database. The enrollment period was 1 October 2018 to 17 April 2019. On day 1, eligible patients (N = 339 007) received baloxavir, oseltamivir, zanamivir, or laninamivir. Baseline characteristics were standardized using the inverse probability of treatment weighting method. The primary end point was the incidence of hospitalization (days 2–14). Secondary end points included antibacterial use, secondary pneumonia, and additional antiinfluenza drug use. Results Compared with the baloxavir group, the incidence of hospitalization was greater in the oseltamivir group (risk ratio [RR] and 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.41 [1.00–2.00]; risk difference [RD] and 95% CI, 0.06 [.01–.12]) and zanamivir group (RR, 1.85 [1.23–2.78]; RD, 0.11 [.02–.20]). Oseltamivir-treated patients were less likely to require antibacterials than baloxavir-treated patients (RR, 0.87 [.82–.91]). However, oseltamivir-treated patients were more likely to be hospitalized with antibacterials (RR, 1.70 [1.21–2.38]) or antibacterial injection (RR, 1.67 [1.17–2.38]) than baloxavir-treated patients (post hoc analysis). Compared with baloxavir-treated patients, additional antiinfluenza drug use was greater in oseltamivir-, zanamivir-, and laninamivir-treated patients (RR, 1.51 [1.05–2.18], 2.84 [2.04–3.96], and 1.68 [1.35–2.10], respectively). Conclusions Baloxavir is an efficacious antiinfluenza treatment that may reduce hospitalization compared with oseltamivir and zanamivir. Clinical Trials Registration University hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000038159)., Baloxavir marboxil is a single-dose oral antiinfluenza drug with a novel mechanism of action. This real-world data study indicates that baloxavir marboxil may reduce hospitalization after influenza outpatient treatment compared with neuraminidase inhibitor treatment.

Introduction Numerous severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) serological tests exists commercially; however, their performance using clinical samples is limited. Although insufficient to detect SARS-CoV-2 in the early phase of infection, antibody assays can be of great use for surveillance studies or for some coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients presenting late to the hospital. Methods This study evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of four commercial SARS-CoV-2 lateral flow antibody tests using 213 serum specimens from 90 PCR-positive confirmed COVID-19 patients. Of 59 negative control sera, 50 were obtained from patients with other respiratory infectious diseases before COVID-19 pandemic began while nine were from patients infected with other respiratory viruses, including two seasonal coronaviruses. Results The varied sensitivities for the four commercial kits were 70.9%, 65.3%, 45.1%, and 65.7% for BioMedomics, Autobio Diagnostics, Genbody, and KURABO, respectively, between sick days 1 and 155 in COVID-19 patients. The sensitivities of the four tests gradually increased over time after infection before sick day 5 (15.0%, 12.5%, 15.0%, and 20.0%); from sick day 11–15 (95.7%, 87.2%, 53.2%, and 89.4%); and after sick day 20 (100%, 100%, 68.6%, and 96.1%), respectively. For severe illness, the sensitivities were quite high in the late phase after sick day 15. The specificities were over 96% for all four tests. No cross-reaction due to other pathogens, including seasonal coronaviruses, was observed. Conclusions Our results demonstrated the large differences in the antibody test performances. This ought to be considered when performing surveillance analysis.

The COVID-19 pandemic has been a major concern worldwide; however, easily accessible treatment options for patients with mild COVID-19 remain limited. Since the oral intake ofThis is an exploratory, multicentre, double-blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. This study was initiated in December 2021 and concludes in April 2023. The planned number of enrolled subjects is 100 (50 subjects×2 groups); subject enrolment will be conducted until October 2022. Patients with asymptomatic or mild COVID-19 will be enrolled and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to group A (oral intake of LC-Plasma-containing capsule, 200 mg/day, for 14 days) or group B (oral intake of placebo capsule, for 14 days). The primary endpoint is the change in subjective symptoms measured by the severity score. Secondary endpoints include SARS-CoV-2 viral loads, biomarkers for pDC activation, serum SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies, serum cytokines, interferon and interferon-inducible antiviral effectors and the proportion of subjects with emergency room visits to medical institutions or who are hospitalised.The study protocol was approved by the Clinical Research Review Board of Nagasaki University, in accordance with the Clinical Trials Act of Japan. The study will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, the Clinical Trials Act, and other current legal regulations in Japan. Written informed consent will be obtained from all the participants. The results of this study will be reported in journal publications.Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (registration number: jRCTs071210097).

Managing mild illness in COVID-19 and predicting progression to severe disease are concerning issues. Here, we investigated the outcomes of Japanese patients with mild COVID-19, and identified triage risk factors for further hospitalization and emergency department (ED) visits at a single tertiary hospital. A triage checklist with 30 factors was used. Patients recommended for isolation were followed up for 10 days for subsequent ED visits or hospital admission. Overall, 338 patients (median age, 44.0; 45% women) visited the clinic 5.0 days (median) after symptom onset. Thirty-six patients were immediately hospitalized following triage; others were isolated. In total, 72 non-hospitalized patients visited the ED during their isolation, and 30 were hospitalized after evaluation for oxygen desaturation. The median ED visit and hospitalization durations after symptom onset were 5.0 and 8.0 days, respectively. The checklist factors associated with hospitalization during isolation were age > 50 years, body mass index > 25 kg/m2, hypertension, tachycardia with pulse rate > 100/min or blood pressure > 135 mmHg at triage, and >3-day delay in hospital visit after symptom onset. No patients died. Altogether, 80% of patients with mild COVID-19 could be safely isolated at home. Age, BMI, underlying hypertension, date after symptom onset, tachycardia, and systolic blood pressure at triage might be related to later hospitalization., Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11(18), art. no. 5444; 2022

Background Before advance care planning, it is essential to understand the differences in preferences for medical care of terminal-phase pneumonia in elderly patients among the patients, their families, and their doctors. This study aimed to clarify these differences and investigate the actual care provided to elderly patients with pneumonia in nursing hospitals. Methods Multicenter questionnaire surveys of 179 patients admitted to nursing homes and long-term care beds in hospitals of three healthcare corporations, their families, and their physicians were conducted between January and August 2018. The questionnaires mainly assessed preferences for life-prolonging medical care procedures, including antibiotic treatments, in terminal-phase pneumonia. A follow-up survey regarding the prognosis and the actual care provided by the physicians was conducted 1 year after the first survey. Results Only 16.2% of the patients had sufficient prior discussions with their families about their care. More families preferred cardiac massage, intubation, and tracheostomy, while fewer families preferred peripheral intravenous fluids or antibiotics than physicians. A total of 30 patients’ families (16.7%) answered to withhold antibiotic treatment, while all physicians supported antibiotic administration. The only significant factor related to withholding antibiotics was high age (P = 0.0057). The follow-up survey administered to the doctors revealed that 49 patients (35.7%) had died within one year. Of the 137 patients, 54 patients (39.4%) had developed pneumonia during this observation period and all were treated with antibiotics. Conclusions This study revealed large discrepancies between patients/families and physicians regarding preferences for care. Medical staff should make efforts to fill the gap by ensuring advance care planning.

Background Baloxavir marboxil (baloxavir) is expected to reduce influenza transmission by rapid reduction of viral load. The incidence of household transmission was compared between index patients (IPs) treated with baloxavir and those treated with neuraminidase inhibitors. Methods Using a Japanese claims database, the first family members with influenza diagnosis during the 2018–2019 influenza season were identified as IPs, and the diagnosis date was designated day 1. According to the anti-influenza drug dispensed to the IP, their families were classified into the oral baloxavir group and 3 controls: oral oseltamivir group (a primary control), inhaled zanamivir group, and inhaled laninamivir group. A household transmission was defined as influenza diagnosed for any non-IP family members during days 3−8. The incidence of household transmission was compared between groups using a logistic regression model adjusting backgrounds of IPs. Results The proportion of families with household transmission was 17.98% (15 226 of 84 672) in the baloxavir group and 24.16% (14 983 of 62 004) in the oseltamivir group. The covariate-adjusted odds ratio (oseltamivir/baloxavir) was 1.09 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.05–1.12), which indicated significantly lower incidence in the baloxavir group. The adjusted odds ratios (controls/baloxavir) against zanamivir and laninamivir were 0.93 (95% CI, .89–.97) and 0.99 (95% CI, .96–1.02), respectively. Conclusions Baloxavir may contribute to reduction in household transmission compared with oseltamivir. In comparison between baloxavir and inhalants, a similar reduction was not shown and it might be due to unmeasured confounding by administration route differences.

Background and objectiveLimited evidence exists regarding the outcomes of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) who are not hospitalized. This study aimed to assess the outcomes for mild COVID-19 patients in terms of emergency department (ED) visits and hospital admission given initial outpatient triage evaluation and to identify the triage factors affecting these outcomes.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study investigated adult COVID-19 Japanese patients who were triaged at Nagasaki University Hospital between April 1, 2021, and May 31, 2021. A triage checklist with 30 factors was used to identify patients requiring hospitalization. Patients recommended for isolation were followed up for later ED visit or hospital admission.ResultsOverall, 338 COVID-19 patients (mean age, 44.7; 45% women) visited the clinic at an average of 5.4 days after symptom onset. Thirty-six patients (10.6%) were hospitalized from triage, and the rest were recommended for isolation. Seventy-two non-hospitalized patients (23.8%) visited ED during their isolation period, and 30 (9.9%) were hospitalized after ED evaluation. The mean duration to ED visit and hospitalization after symptom onset were 8.8 and 9.7 days, respectively. Checklist factors associated with hospitalization during the isolation period were age > 50 years, obesity with BMI > 25, underlying hypertension, tachycardia with HR > 100/min or blood pressure >135 mmHg at triage, and >□3-day delay in hospital visit after symptom onset.ConclusionClinicians should be wary of COVID-19 patients with above risk factors and prompt them to seek follow-up assessment by a medical professional.SUMMARY AT A GLANCEOverall, 338 patients with mild COVID-19 were retrospectively followed up. Factors such as age >□50 years, BMI□> □25, underlying hypertension, high blood pressure and tachycardia at triage, and delayed visit after symptom onset were associated with emergency department visit and hospitalization during the isolation period.

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has emerged worldwide. Although several medications have been approved for treating moderate-to-severe COVID-19, very few treatment strategy has been established for patients with mild COVID-19 who do not require oxygen administration. Clarithromycin is a macrolide antimicrobial agent that has been widely used for bacterial respiratory infectious diseases. Clarithromycin also acts an immunomodulating drug and suppresses cytokine storms in viral respiratory diseases, including influenza. In this study, we aim to evaluate the efficacy of clarithromycin in patients with mild COVID-19. Methods and analysis: This is an exploratory, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. This study was initiated in May 2021 and will end in July 2022. Patients with mild COVID-19 pneumonia who do not require oxygen administration will be enrolled and randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to group A (administration of clarithromycin 800 mg/day), group B (administration of clarithromycin 400 mg/day) or group C (standard treatment without clarithromycin). The planned number of enrolled patients is 60 (20 patients × three groups). The primary endpoint is the number of days required to improve the clinical symptoms as measured by the severity score. Secondary endpoints include days for recovery of the body temperature, proportion of patients with oxygen administration, inflammatory cytokines, viral load, serum immunoglobulins, peripheral blood lymphocytes, blood biomarkers and pneumonia infiltrations. Ethics and dissemination: The study protocol was approved by the Clinical Research Review Board of Nagasaki University in accordance with the Clinical Trials Act in Japan. The study will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, the Clinical Trials Act and other current legal regulations in Japan. Written informed consent will be obtained from all the participants. The results of this study will be reported as journal publications. Trial registration number: jRCTs071210011., BMJ Open, 11(9), art. no. e053325; 2021

Background: Influenza affects approximately a billion people globally, including > 10 million Japanese individuals every year. Baloxavir marboxil (baloxavir [BXM]; a selective cap-dependent endonuclease inhibitor) is approved for influenza treatment in Japan. We compared the incidence of intra-familial transmission of influenza between BXM and oseltamivir (OTV) treatments using a simulation model. Methods: Using the JMDC Claims Database, we identified index case (IC) as the first family member diagnosed with influenza during the 2018–19 influenza season, and classified the families into BXM or OTV group per the drug dispensed to ICs. Using a novel influenza intra-familial infection model, we simulated the duration of influenza infection in ICs based on agent-specific virus shedding periods. Intra-familial infections were defined as non-IC family members infected during the agent-specific viral shedding period in ICs. The virus incubation periods in the non-IC family members were considered to exclude secondary infections from potentially external exposure. The primary endpoint was proportion of families with intra-familial infections. For between-group comparisons, we used a multivariate logistic regression model. Results: The median proportion of families with intra-familial transmission was 9.57% and 19.35% in the BXM (N = 84 672) and OTV (N = 62 004) groups, respectively. The multivariate odds ratio of 1.73 (2.5th–97.5th percentiles, 1.68–1.77) indicated a substantially higher incidence of intra-familial infections in the OTV group versus the BXM group. Subgroup analyses by ICs’ age category, virus type, and month of onset revealed similar trends favoring BXM. Conclusions: BXM treatment of ICs may contribute to a greater reduction in intra-familial influenza transmission than OTV treatment., Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 75(6), pp. 927-935; 2022

Background This study aimed to clarify the involvement of anaerobes in aspiration pneumonia by measuring volatile sulfur compounds (VSCs), which are metabolites of anaerobic bacteria in the mouth. Methods This study included 84 older adult patients (mean age, 82.5 ± 7.34 years) who had dementia and were hospitalized for more than 6 months. We measured the VSCs in the patient's mouth with Oral Chroma and obtained the data of pneumonia development in the past 6 months. We also evaluated the association or correlation of VSCs and some factors which might be the risk factors of aspiration pneumonia. Results The development of pneumonia had no significant association with the VSCs in the patient's mouth. Conclusion The present pilot study suggests that anaerobes might not be the main causative pathogens of aspiration pneumonia in older adult patients.

IntroductionThe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic has been emerged worldwide. Although several medications have been approved for treating moderate-to-severe COVID-19, no treatment strategy has been established for mild COVID-19 patients who do not require oxygen administration. The spread of SARS -CoV-2 has been mostly through patients with mild COVID-19; therefore, treating patients with mild COVID-19 is critical in society. Clarithromycin is a macrolide antimicrobial agent that has been widely used for bacterial respiratory infectious diseases. Clarithromycin also acts an immunomodulating drug and suppresses cytokine storms in viral respiratory diseases, including influenza infection. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of clarithromycin in patients with mild COVID-19.Methods and analysisThis is a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled, 3-armed parallel group comparison, exploratory trial. Subjects with mild COVID-19 pneumonia who did not require oxygen administration were enrolled and randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to Group A (administration of clarithromycin 800 mg/day), Group B (administration of clarithromycin 400 mg/day), or Group C (standard treatment without clarithromycin). The primary endpoint was the number of days required to improve clinical symptoms as measured by the severity score. Secondary endpoints included days to recover the body temperature, proportion of subjects with oxygen administration, inflammatory cytokines, viral load, serum immunoglobulins, peripheral blood lymphocytes, blood biomarkers, and pneumonia infiltrations.Ethics and disseminationThe study protocol was approved by the Clinical Research Review Board of Nagasaki University in accordance with the Clinical Trials Act in Japan. The study will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, the Clinical Trials Act, and other current legal regulations in Japan. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. The results of this study will be reported as journal publications.RegistrationThis study was registered at the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (registration number: jRCTs071210011).Strengths and limitations of this studyThis is the first randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of clarithromycin against COVID-19 pneumonia, especially in patients with mild COVID-19 pneumonia who do not require oxygen administration.To date, no treatment strategy has been established for mild COVID-19 pneumonia.The major limitations of this study are its exploratory nature and relatively small sample size.Another limitation is the open-label study design and generalizability because this study was conducted only in Japan with Japanese patients.

Aims: Estimating the monetary value of the convenience of using influenza antivirals approved in Japan from a patient perspective using a conjoint analysis. Methods: An online survey (August 2020) was performed on individuals aged 20–64 years living in Japan who had taken oral or inhalant antivirals for influenza treatment in the 2018/19 or 2019/20 seasons. Efficacy and safety were assumed to be equivalent among the antivirals. The attributes for the conjoint analysis included route (oral or inhalant), duration, frequency of administration, and out-ofpocket expenses. A conditional logit model was applied as a baseline model. The monetary value of each attribute was calculated by comparing the same utility of the linearly interpolated level of the out-of-pocket attribute. Another survey to determine the experiences of the latest antiviral intake was also conducted on the same respondents. Results: Of the respondents, 1,550 were men and 1,587 were women. The monetary value for oral antivirals was estimated to be higher, saving JPY 741 (USD 7.06, as of August 2020), compared with inhalant. Regarding the length and frequency of administration, five days corresponds to an increase of JPY 2,072, compared with one day, and twice a day corresponds to a JPY 574 increase compared to once a day. Conclusions: The results suggest that – among the antivirals approved in Japan – the monetary value of the utility is the highest in the single dose oral antiviral, baloxavir marboxil (baloxavir). Although the drug cost was highest in baloxavir among the brand antivirals, the difference in the value of utility for influenza patient was estimated to be larger than the difference in the drug costs. Limitations: Although individuals with diverse attributes from all over the country were included in the survey, they are not necessarily a representative population of the Japanese society., Journal of Medical Economics, 24(1), pp.244-254; 2021

Interleukin 6 (IL-6) inhibitors are the first-line treatment for idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease (iMCD); however, there is no established treatment for cases that are resistant to IL-6 inhibitors. Although sirolimus, a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor, has been suggested to be effective in patients with iMCD, the long-term safety and efficacy of sirolimus on individuals with IL-6 inhibitor-resistant iMCD have not been evaluated.In this investigator-initiated, multicenter, open-label trial, the long-term safety of sirolimus will be evaluated in patients participating in a placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial on tocilizumab (TCZ)-resistant iMCD. The study will be conducted in 7 centers in Japan. This trial will be promptly started after the evaluation and examination for 16 weeks in the preceding study. The trial will be completed by the time the drug is approved for iMCD treatment in Japan. The primary endpoint is the incidence of adverse events. The secondary endpoints include the following: the levels of hemoglobin, albumin, and C-reactive protein; change in CHAP score; physician global assessment (100-mm visual analog scale); patient global assessment (100-mm visual analog scale); and lymph node changes in subjects with lymphadenopathy.This clinical trial will provide evidence regarding the long-term safety of sirolimus as a potential novel therapeutic agent for patients with tocilizumab-resistant iMCD.jRCT2051200050.

Objective To evaluate the annual variation in the frequency of patient-acquired azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus (ARAf), and correlate it to the amount of oral triazole prescribed, in Nagasaki, Japan. Methods A. fumigatus isolates from respiratory specimens collected in the Nagasaki University Hospital (NUH) between 1996 and 2017 were included in the study. The amount of oral triazole prescribed in NUH since 2001 was obtained from the medical ordering system. Mutations in cyp51A, hmg1, and erg6 genes of ARAf were also analysed. Results From a total of 240 ARAf strains, 12 (5%), 6 (2.5%), 15 (6.25%), and 3 (1.25%) strains were resistant to itraconazole (ITC), voriconazole (VRC), to either ITC or VRC, and both triazoles, respectively. The amount of prescribed VRC increased annually, and was three times as large as that of ITC in 2017. All eleven patients harbouring ITC-resistant strains had a history of prior ITC treatment, while only one of six patients harbouring VRC-resistant strains had a history of prior VRC treatment. cyp51A mutations were recorded in 10 strains; however, tandem repeat mutations of the promoter region of cyp51A were not observed. Several azole-resistant strains had non-cyp51A mutations. Conclusions The frequency of patient-acquired ARAf is not increasing in Nagasaki, Japan. Furthermore, the prevalence of VRC-induced ARAf was rare despite the remarkable increase in the amount of prescribed VRC. Mutations in genes other than cyp51A should also be considered when ARAf strains are obtained from patients treated with azole antifungals.

BACKGROUND: For relatively invasive upper gastrointestinal endoscopy procedures, such as an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), and also lower gastrointestinal endoscopy procedures, intravenous anesthesia is routinely used to reduce patient anxiety. However, with the use of intravenous anesthesia, even at mild to moderate depth of anesthesia, there is always a risk of upper airway obstruction due to a relaxation of the upper airway muscles.With the advent of nasal high flow (NHF) devices that allow humidified high flow air through the nasal cavity, can be used as a respiratory management method in the context of anesthesia. AIRVO is commonly used for patients with obstructive sleep apnea and other respiratory disorders. This device uses a mild positive pressure load (several cmH2O) that improves carbon dioxide (CO2) washout and reduces rebreathing to improve respiratory function and therefore is widely used to prevent hypoxemia and hypercapnia.This study aims to maintain upper airway patency by applying NHF with air (AIRVO) as a respiratory management method during intravenous anesthesia for patients undergoing an ERCP. In addition, this study investigates whether the use of an NHF device in this context can prevent intraoperative hypercapnia and hypoxemia. METHODS/DESIGN: This study design employed 2 groups of subjects. Both received intravenous anesthesia while undergoing an ERCP, and 1 group also used a concurrent nasal cannula NHF device. Here we examine if the use of an NHF device during intravenous anesthesia can prevent hypoxemia and hypercapnia, which could translate to improved anesthesia management.Efficacy endpoints were assessed using a transcutaneous CO2 monitor (TCM). This device measured the changes in CO2 concentration during treatment. Transcutaneous CO2 (PtcCO2) concentrations of 60?mm Hg or more (PaCO2?>?55?mm Hg) were considered marked hypercapnia. PtcCO2 concentrations of 50 to 60?mm Hg or more (equivalent to PaCO2?>?45?mm Hg) were considered moderate hypercapnia.Furthermore, the incidence of hypoxemia with a transcutaneous oxygen saturation value of 90% or less, and whether the use of NHF was effective in preventing this adverse clinical event were evaluated. DISCUSSION: The purpose of this study was to obtain evidence for the utility of NHF as a potential therapeutic device for patients undergoing an ERCP under sedation, assessed by determining if the incidence rates of hypercapnia and hypoxemia decreased in the NHF device group, compared to the control group that did not use this device. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered in the jRCTs 072190021.URL https://jrct.niph.go.jp/en-latest-detail/jRCTs072190021., Medicine, 99(19), art.no.e20036; 2020

BACKGROUND: Glucocorticoids are an important class of medication for patients with adult-onset Still disease (AOSD), however, relapse following glucocorticoid reduction and adverse events due to long-term effects of glucocorticoid are still problematic. It is of course essential to minimize the risk of treatment. Immunosuppressive therapies such as methotrexate and biologics including tocilizumab are used in glucocorticoid-dependent patients with AOSD, but no second-line treatments for patients with glucocorticoid dependence have been established yet. Given that these drugs also have the potential to cause adverse events, alternative treatments are sought. Recently, elevated heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) has been reported in the serum of patients with AOSD, suggesting that HO-1 activity contributes to AOSD pathogenesis and may represent a new therapeutic target for the treatment of AOSD. The amino acid 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) is a non-proteinogenic δ amino acid in human body. An addition of ferrous iron to 5-ALA enhances heme biosynthesis. The increase in heme in vivo induces HO-1 production, a heme-degrading enzyme. Elevated HO-1 has been suggested to contribute to the pathogenesis of AOSD, and administration of 5-ALA and ferrous iron may be a potential treatment for AOSD. METHODS/DESIGN: This study is a single-arm, open-label pilot intervention study using clinical endpoints to investigate the effects of oral 5-ALA with sodium ferrous citrate on glucocorticoid reduction in patients with AOSD receiving glucocorticoid therapy. DISCUSSION: This pilot intervention study will provide evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of 5-ALA/sodium ferrous citrate as a potential new therapeutic agent for glucocorticoid-dependent patients with AOSD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (https://jrct.niph.go.jp) on January 14, 2020 as jRCTs071190042., Medicine, 99(50), e22708; 2020

Background Interleukin 6 (IL-6) inhibitors are the first-line treatment for idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease (iMCD); however, there is no established treatment for cases that are resistant to IL-6 inhibitors. Although sirolimus, a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor, has been suggested to be effective in patients with iMCD, the long-term safety and efficacy of sirolimus on individuals with IL-6 inhibitor-resistant iMCD have not been evaluated. Methods/design In this investigator-initiated, multicenter, open-label trial, the long-term safety of sirolimus will be evaluated in patients participating in a placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial on tocilizumab (TCZ)-resistant iMCD. The study will be conducted in 7 centers in Japan. This trial will be promptly started after the evaluation and examination for 16 weeks in the preceding study. The trial will be completed by the time the drug is approved for iMCD treatment in Japan. The primary endpoint is the incidence of adverse events. The secondary endpoints include the following: the levels of hemoglobin, albumin, and C-reactive protein; change in CHAP score; physician global assessment (100-mm visual analog scale); patient global assessment (100-mm visual analog scale); and lymph node changes in subjects with lymphadenopathy. Discussion This clinical trial will provide evidence regarding the long-term safety of sirolimus as a potential novel therapeutic agent for patients with tocilizumab-resistant iMCD. Trial registration number jRCT2051200050.

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text, Background: Pain in glossodynia may be severe; it may prevent patients from working, interfere with daily life activities, and necessitate a patient's visit to a medical institution for consultation and treatment. The pain may be described as persistent and burning (tingling, tingling) or stinging. Patients may complain of dry mouth (dryness), which is thought to cause inflammation of the tongue and gingival mucous membranes and increased pain. Medications are prescribed based on the symptoms of glossodynia, and the therapeutic effect is confirmed. However, each drug has side effects, for example, pain may reduce, but drowsiness and dizziness may occur; further, there is always a tendency of drowsiness. On the other hand, Goreisan, a Chinese herbal medicine, has already been used by physicians to treat pain in the oral and maxillofacial regions resulting from rapid changes in air pressure. However, the lack of high-quality clinical research has been of concern, and a randomized clinical trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of Goreisan for treatment of pain in glossodynia is warranted. Methods/design: This multicenter, randomized, controlled study will involve patients treated for glossodynia-related pain. In the experimental group, Goreisan will be taken for 12 weeks in combination with conventional treatment. Participants in the control group will not take any Kampo medicine; only the standard treatment will be taken. Subsequently, the degree of pain will be assessed, and saliva tests of all the patients on their first visit will be performed. Goreisan will be taken at a dose of 7.5 g/d (minute 3) for 12 consecutive weeks. Twelve weeks later, the degree of pain of each patient will be assessed. Discussion The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy of Goreisan for pain reduction in patients undergoing treatment for glossodynia-related pain. If pain in glossodynia patients can be reduced by the administration of Goreisan, its candidacy as an alternative treatment for pain in glossodynia can be further supported by more reliable research. Trial registration: The study was registered in the jRCTs071200017. URL https://jrct.niph.go.jp/latest-detail/jRCTs071200017.

Background: The introduction of biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs into clinical practice has dramatically improved the clinical outcomes of individuals with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We are conducting the IFX-SIRIUS STUDY I that evaluates whether switching from originator infliximab (IFX) to its biosimilar, CT-P13, is not inferior in maintaining nonclinical relapse to continue treatment with originator IFX in patients with RA achieving clinical remission. It is the next great issue whether disease activity can be maintained in good condition after discontinuation of CT-P13 because no evidence is available regarding the clinical value of discontinuing biosimilars in patients with RA. Thus, we will evaluate whether a condition without clinical relapse will be maintained after discontinuation of CT-P13 in patients with RA, achieving clinical remission or low disease activity during the IFX-SIRIUS STUDY I. Methods/design: This study is an interventional, multicenter, open-label, single-arm clinical trial with a 48-week follow-up. Patients with RA who are treated with CT-P13 and sustained nonclinical relapse during the IFX-SIRIUS STUDY I will be included. Patients will discontinue CT-P13 after the study period of the IFX-SIRIUS STUDY I. We will evaluate disease activity by clinical disease activity indices and musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS). The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients who do not have clinical relapse during the study period. Important secondary endpoints are the changes from the baseline of the MSUS scores. We will also comprehensively analyze the serum levels of multiple biomarkers, such as cytokines and chemokines. In addition, if a clinical relapse occurs in patients after the discontinuation of CT-P13, we will evaluate the effectiveness and safety of restarting CT-P13. Discussion: The study results are expected to show the clinical benefit of the discontinuation of CT-P13 and effectiveness and safety of restarting CT-P13 after clinical relapse. The strength of this study is to prospectively evaluate the therapeutic effectiveness by not only clinical disease activity indices but also standardized MSUS findings in multiple centers. We will explore whether parameters at baseline can predict a nonclinical relapse after the discontinuation of CT-P13 by integrating multilateral assessments, that is, patient's characteristics, clinical disease activity indices, MSUS findings, and serum biomarkers. Trial registration: This study was registered in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (https://jrct.niph.go.jp) on April 20, 2020 as jRCTs071200007.

Background Idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease (iMCD) is a rare lymphoproliferative disorder of unknown etiology with systemic symptoms that include fever, night sweats, weight loss, and fatigue. Although tocilizumab (TCZ), which is a recombinant, humanized, anti-human interleukin 6 receptor monoclonal antibody, has been recommended to treat patients with iMCD, 40% of patients with iMCD do not achieve complete remission with TCZ treatment. Methods/design In this phase II, investigator-initiated, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group trial, the efficacy and safety of sirolimus will be compared with placebo in patients with TCZ-resistant iMCD. The study will be conducted in 8 centers in Japan. Participants (n = 20) will be randomly assigned to receive 2 mg of oral sirolimus (n = 10) or placebo (n = 10) once daily for 16 weeks. The primary endpoint is a decrease in CHAP score by ≥1 from baseline at 16 weeks. Secondary endpoints include levels of hemoglobin, albumin, and C-reactive protein; change in CHAP score; SF-36 Health Survey Questionnaire; physician global assessment (100 mm visual analog scale); patient global assessment (100 mm visual analog scale) at 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks; change in lymphadenopathy at 16 weeks; and pharmacodynamic assessment, including the measurement of whole blood sirolimus level. Discussion This clinical trial will provide evidence of efficacy and safety of sirolimus as a potential new therapeutic agent for patients with TCZ-resistant iMCD. Trial registration This study was registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials as jRCT2071190029 on October 8, 2019.

BACKGROUND: The introduction of biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) into clinical practice has dramatically improve the clinical outcomes of individuals with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, bDMARDs are associated with high costs, which has resulted in restricted treatment access and a burden on medical insurance finances. Although biosimilars offer cost-saving, their effectiveness and safety must be established in Post-Marketing Surveillance (PMS). Infliximab (IFX), a chimeric monoclonal antibody to TNF-alpha, is the first bDMARD; its biosimilar, CT-P13, is the first biosimilar DMARD approved for RA treatment in Japan. We will evaluate whether switching from originator IFX to CT-P13 is not inferior for maintaining non-clinical relapse to continued treatment with originator IFX in RA patients achieving clinical remission. METHODS/DESIGN: This study is an interventional, multicenter, open-label, single-arm against historical control and noninferiority clinical trial with a 24-week follow-up. Eighty RA patients who are treated by originator IFX for ?24 weeks and are achieving clinical remission will be included. Patients will be switched to CT-P13 with the unchanged dosing regimen. We will evaluate disease activity by measuring clinical disease activity indices and by using musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS). The primary endpoint is the ratio of patients who experience a nonclinical relapse during the study period. Important secondary endpoints are the changes from the baseline of the MSUS scores. We will also comprehensively analyze the serum levels of many biomarkers such as cytokines and chemokines.DISCUSSION: The study results are expected to show the noninferiority of switching to CT-P13 over the continuation of originator IFX. The strength of this study is its prospective evaluation of therapeutic efficacy using not only clinical disease activity indices but also MSUS to accurately and objectively evaluate disease activity at the joint level among patients drawn from multiple centers with a standardized evaluation by MSUS. We will explore whether parameters at baseline can predict a nonclinical relapse after switching from originator IFX to CT-P13 by integrating multilateral assessments, i.e., clinical disease activity indices, MSUS findings, and serum biomarkers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (https://jrct.niph.go.jp) on October 11, 2019 as jRCTs071190030., Medicine, 99(30), e21151; 2020

BACKGROUND: For relatively invasive upper gastrointestinal endoscopy procedures, such as an endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), intravenous anesthesia is routinely used to reduce patient anxiety. However, with the use of intravenous sedation, even at mild to moderate depth of anesthesia, there is always a risk of upper airway obstruction due to a relaxation of the upper airway muscles.With the advent of Nasal High Flow (NHF) devices that allow humidified high flow air through the nasal cavity, can be used as a respiratory management method in the context of anesthesia. AIRVO is commonly used for patients with obstructive sleep apnea and other respiratory disorders. This device uses a mild positive pressure load (several cmH2O) that improves carbon dioxide (CO2) washout and reduces rebreathing to improve respiratory function and therefore is widely used to prevent hypoxemia and hypercapnia.This study aims to maintain upper airway patency by applying NHF with air (AIRVO) as a respiratory management method during intravenous anesthesia for patients undergoing an ESD. In addition, this study investigates whether the use of an NHF device in this context can prevent intraoperative hypercapnia and hypoxemia. METHODS/DESIGN: This study design employed 2 groups of subjects. Both received intravenous anesthesia while undergoing an ESD, and 1 group also used a concurrent nasal cannula NHF device. Here we examine if the use of an NHF device during intravenous anesthesia can prevent hypoxemia and hypercapnia, which could translate to improved anesthesia management.Efficacy endpoints were assessed using a transcutaneous CO2 monitor. This device measured the changes in CO2 concentration during treatment. Transcutaneous CO2 (PtcCO2) concentrations of 60 mmHg or more (PaCO2?>?55 mmHg) were considered marked hypercapnia. PtcCO2 concentrations of 50 to 60 mmHg or more (equivalent to PaCO2?>?45 mmHg) were considered moderate hypercapnia.Furthermore, the incidence of hypoxemia with a transcutaneous oxygen saturation value of 90% or less, and whether the use of NHF was effective in preventing this adverse clinical event were evaluated. DISCUSSION: The purpose of this study was to obtain evidence for the utility of NHF as a potential therapeutic device for patients undergoing an ESD under anesthesia, assessed by determining if the incidence rates of hypercapnia and hypoxemia decreased in the NHF device group, compared to the control group that did not use of this device. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered the jRCTs 072190022.URLhttps://jrct.niph.go.jp/en-latest-detail/jRCTs072190022., Medicine, 99(19), art.no.e20038; 2020

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has been reported among patients with RASopathy. Five patients have been reported: three with SHOC2 variants, one with a PTPN11 variant, and one with a KRAS variant. SHOC2 variant might represent a relatively common predisposing factor for SLE among the RASopathy genes. However, the clinical details were only reported for two patients, while information on the remaining patient appeared only in a tabular format with minimal clinical description. Here, we report a patient with a SHOC2 variant and SLE. The proband was a 28-year-old male patient with intellectual disabilities, a short stature, dysmorphic facial features, and thin hair. He developed hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and afebrile generalized seizures at the ages of 7 and 18 years, respectively. At the age of 24 years, he presented with a 3-day history of intermittent fever accompanied by right chest pain and a malar butterfly rash. He fulfilled both the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria and the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) criteria for SLE and was successfully treated with prednisolone. Medical exome sequencing identified a de novo SHOC2 variant (c.4A > G, p.S2G). The present report of a second patient who fulfills both the ACR criteria and the SLICC criteria of SLE. We suggest that the association between SHOC2 variant and SLE represents more than a chance association. In the event of fever of unknown origin in patients with constitutional SHOC2 pathogenic variant, SLE should be suspected.

The prevention and control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) are important, particularly in emergency units. The active surveillance of MRSA was prospectively performed at the emergency medical center of Nagasaki University Hospital. After obtaining nasal swab specimens, a fully automated molecular test (FAMT) and a culture-screening method were utilized for MRSA detection. A total of 150 patients were enrolled in the study, and 366 nasal swab specimens were obtained. MRSA was detected by culture in 11 (7.3%) patients including one new acquisition and by the FAMT in 34 (22.7%) patients including 13 new acquisitions. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the FAMT at the patient level were 86.7, 85.2, 39.4, and 98.3%, respectively, when compared with the culture-based results. An FAMT can effectively detect MRSA colonization, which may remain undetected with the conventional method, and it may be useful in detecting newly acquired MRSAs.

BACKGROUND Colchicine is the first-line treatment for familial Mediterranean fever (FMF), but secondary amyloidosis resulting from persistent inflammation is a concern in patients with colchicine-resistant or colchicine-intolerant FMF. Although tocilizumab (TCZ), which is a recombinant, humanized, anti-human interleukin 6 receptor monoclonal antibody, has been reported to prevent FMF attacks, the long-term safety and efficacy of TCZ on individuals with colchicine-resistant or colchicine-intolerant FMF have not been evaluated. METHODS/DESIGN In this investigator-initiated, multicenter, open-label trial, the long-term safety of TCZ will be evaluated in patients participating in a placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial on colchicine-resistant or colchicine-intolerant FMF. The study will be conducted in 9 centers in Japan. After the evaluation and examination for 24 weeks in the preceding study, this trial will be started promptly. The trial will be completed by the time the drug is approved for FMF treatment in Japan. The primary endpoint is the incidence of adverse events, and the secondary endpoints include the number of FMF attacks, number of occurrences of accompanying symptoms during attacks, serum C-reactive protein and amyloid A levels, general evaluation by a physician (100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]), general evaluation by a patient (100 mm VAS), and body temperature. DISCUSSION The study is expected to obtain evidence regarding the long-term safety of TCZ as a potential new therapeutic agent for patients with colchicine-resistant or colchicine-intolerant FMF. TRIAL REGISTRATION This study was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000037116) as UMIN000032557 on May 30 2018.