Search

To clarify the utility of microballoon catheter in renal arterial ethanol embolization of renal angiomyolipoma (AML).A total of 20 patients (15 women, 5 men) with median age of 45 years (39-60 years) underwent embolization to treat 22 AMLs. A mixture of ethanol and iodized oil was injected into the feeding arteries of 13 tumors using balloon occlusion (the balloon embolization group) with a microballoon catheter and 9 tumors without using balloon occlusion (the non-balloon embolization group). Changes in the maximum tumor diameter, tumor volume, and adverse events were evaluated.The median baseline maximum tumor diameters and volumes were 6.3 cm and 61.4 cmBalloon occlusion may not affect tumor shrinkage when embolizing AMLs with a mixture of ethanol and lipiodol.

To evaluate the feasibility and safety of transarterial injection of a miriplatin-iodized oil suspension combined with Emprint miriplatin-iodized oil suspension-microwave ablation in patients with medium-sized (3-5 cm) hepatocellular carcinomas.This retrospective study included a total of 11 patients with 12 hepatocellular carcinomas (mean size, 3.6 ± 0.6 cm) underwent miriplatin-iodized oil suspension-microwave ablation. Microwave ablation was performed under the guidance of computed tomography fluoroscopy following transarterial miriplatin-iodized oil suspension injection on the same day. Technical success, complications, and local tumor progression were assessed.The primary and secondary technical success rates were 75.0% and 100%, respectively. The number of treatment sessions per nodule was 1.25 ± 0.45. A total 15 sessions were required to achieve technical success (one session in nine lesions, two sessions in three lesions). Two major complications (pneumothorax [n = 1] and hemorrhage [n = 1]) occurred (2/15, 13.3%). No local tumor progression was observed during the follow-up period (mean 12.0 ± 2.0 months, range 2.7-23.9 months).Miriplatin-iodized oil suspension-microwave ablation for medium-sized hepatocellular carcinomas can be safely performed with good local control.

To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of radiofrequency (RF) ablation using an ablation system (arfa RF ABLATION SYSTEMBetween October 2019 and August 2021, 80 patients (29 women, 51 men; median age, 70.0 yr) underwent 107 RF ablation sessions using the ablation system to treat 151 tumors in the liver (The technical success rate was 100% (107/107). Ablation zones in two tumors were insufficient. Therefore, the primary technique efficacy rate was 98.1% (105/107). Grade 3 hepatic infarction (1.6%, 1/64) and grade 4 pleuritis (3.4%, 1/29) occurred respectively after liver and lung RF ablation. During the median follow-up period of 10.2 months (Interquartile range, 4.2 and 16.4 months), local tumor progression developed in two tumors (1.4%, 2/146).The arfa RF ABLATION SYSTEM

To compare the technical efficacy and complications of the transarterial injection of a miriplatin-iodized oil suspension combined with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or microwave ablation (MWA) in the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs). This retrospective study included 123 HCCs in 101 patients treated with the transarterial injection of a miriplatin-iodized oil suspension and RFA (MPT-RFA) (maximum diameter: 1.5 $$\pm $$ 0.5 cm, range: 0.6–3.0 cm) and 68 HCCs in 49 patients treated with the transarterial injection of a miriplatin-iodized oil suspension and MWA (MPT-MWA) (maximum diameter: 1.6 $$\pm $$ 0.7 cm, range: 0.5–3.0 cm). Technical success was defined as the achievement of an ablative margin of at least 5 mm for each tumor. Technical success, complications, and local tumor progression were compared between the two groups. The initial technical success rate was significantly higher with MPT-MWA (94.1%) than with MPT-RFA (76.4%; P = 0.003). The number of treatment sessions per nodule was significantly lower with MPT-MWA (1.1) than with MPT-RFA (1.3) (P = 0.004). The major complication rates were similar with MPT-RFA (5.8%) and MPT-MWA (2.7%) (P = 0.391). The one-year local tumor progression rate was similar between MPT-RFA (0%) and MPT-MWA (0%) (P = 0.73). MPT-MWA may have improved therapeutic efficiency in the treatment of small HCCs.