Search

Background: There is limited epidemiological evidence on outcomes associated with dupilumab exposure during pregnancy; monitoring pregnancy outcomes in large populations is required. Objective: To investigate the potential association between exposure to dupilumab in pregnant women with atopic dermatitis and any adverse pregnancy, neonatal, congenital and post‐partum outcomes. Methods: We performed a multicentre retrospective cohort study across 19 Italian tertiary referral hospital. Childbearing women were eligible if aged 18–49 years and carried out the pregnancy between 1 October 2018 and 1 September 2022. Results: We retrospectively screened records of 5062 patients receiving dupilumab regardless of age and gender, identifying 951 female atopic dermatitis patients of childbearing age, 29 of whom had been exposed to the drug during pregnancy (3%). The median duration of dupilumab treatment prior to conception was 22.5 weeks (range: 3–118). The median time of exposure to the drug during pregnancy was 6 weeks (range: 2–24). All the documented pregnancies were unplanned, and the drug was discontinued in all cases once pregnancy status was reported. The comparison of the study cohort and the control group found no significant drug‐associated risk for adverse pregnancy, congenital, neonatal or post‐partum outcomes. The absence of a statistically significant effect of exposure on the event was confirmed by bivariate analysis and multivariate analysis adjusted for other confounding factors. Conclusions: This cohort of pregnant patients exposed to dupilumab adds to the existing evidence concerning the safety of biologic agents in pregnancy. No safety issues were identified regarding the primary outcome assessed. In clinical practice, these data provide reassurance in case of dupilumab exposure during the first trimester. However, the continuous use of dupilumab throughout pregnancy warrants further research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Injection site reaction (ISR) is a local phenomenon defined as a constellation of symptoms, including swelling, erythema, pruritus, and pain around the site of injection. Objective: ISR is reported as a frequent adverse event after subcutaneous injection (SCI) of several biologics. Methods: We performed an observational real-life study to compare dupilumab and tralokinumab as regards ISR, analysing frequency, duration and intensity of symptoms related to SCI. From January 2023 to June 2023, we enrolled adult patients affected by moderate to severe AD and being on dupilumab or tralokinumab treatment. A 12 items questionnaire was administered to all enrolled patients. Results and conclusions: Three hundred and ninety-two patients were included. ISR was a frequent occurrence in both the treatment groups, with tralokinumab causing ISR more frequently than dupilumab. However, the reactions were generally mild and no patient stopped therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Objectives Methods Results Conclusions Hand eczema (HE) is a common skin disease with a negative impact on patients' quality of life in occupational and non‐occupational settings. Up‐to‐date, data on HE in Italian patients referred for patch testing are lacking.To characterise the profile in terms of demographics, aetiology and patch test results of Italian patients affected by HE referred for patch testing.A retrospective descriptive study on consecutive patients affected by HE who underwent patch testing from 2016 to 2023 in eight dermatology clinics was performed. HE patients were divided into two groups according to the exclusive (HE‐only group) and not‐exclusive (HE+ group) hand involvement, and compared to patients with eczema localised in body areas other than hands (NHE group).One thousand five hundred and ninety‐seven patients were affected by HE (35.3% males; mean age 42.7 years), 60.2% belonging to the HE‐only group and 39.8% to the HE+ group. Occupational dermatitis was diagnosed in 33.2% of HE‐only patients, 25.0% of HE+ patients and 5.2% of NHE patients (p < 0.001). HE‐only patients presented: Allergic Contact Dermatitis (ACD), Irritant Contact Dermatitis (ICD), atopic HE in 48.1%, 47.5% and 7.1%, respectively; hyperkeratotic palmar, acute recurrent vesicular and nummular clinical subtypes in 52.2%, 43.9% and 11.9%, respectively; relevant positive patch test reactions in 48.1% (nickel sulphate 18.9%, methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone 10.6%, methylisothiazolinone 8.6%, p‐phenylenediamine 6.0% and potassium dichromate 4.7%).HE patients, and particularly those with exclusive hand involvement, show a particular profile in terms of demographic and clinical characteristics, etiologies and relevant positive patch test reactions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Even if mild forms of atopic dermatitis (AD) are usually well controlled with topical prescription drugs and emollients, the management of severe forms of the disease may be challenging, especially in special populations (SPs). These patients include groups of disadvantaged people (elderly, patients with disabilities and serious medical conditions) who are usually excluded from clinical trials. As a consequence, most of the data about the efficacy and safety of a drug in these patients derives from post-marketing experiences. In this context, the aim of our study was to retrospectively investigate the effectiveness and safety of tralokinumab in the management of AD in SPs. Methods: A 24-weeks retrospective, dual-center study was performed enrolling patients with a diagnosis of moderate-to-severe AD undergoing treatment with tralokinumab at labelled dosage. Disease severity was assessed using Eczema Area Severity Index (EASI), Pruritus–Numerical Rating Scale (P-NRS), and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score at baseline and after 4 weeks (W4), W16, and W24. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored at the same timepoints. Statistical significance of clinical improvement (EASI, P-NRS, DLQI) at week 4, week 16, and week 24 as compared with baseline was evaluated by using Student's t-test, considering significant a p-value < 0.05. Results: Our study enrolling 27 SPs patients showed a significant improvement in EASI and P-NRS since week 4, continuing to improve up to week 24. Similarly, DLQI significantly decreases at each timepoint as compared with baseline. Finally, no AEs were reported during the study period. Of interest, our cohort included oncologic patients, a patient with a history of severe infection, as well as subjects affected by severe neurological, psychiatric, pulmonary, and/or cardiovascular disease. Discussion: Our experience showed that tralokinumab is effective and safe in elderly patients and subjects affected by severe comorbidities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common inflammatory skin disease with multiple clinical manifestations. Among AD phenotypes, psoriasiform AD shows the coexistence of eczematous itching lesions in flexural areas with psoriasiform plaques. The use of anti-interleukin (IL)-4 and anti-IL-13 in psoriasiform AD may lead to therapeutic failure or worsening of manifestations. A recent Delphi consensus proposed Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) as a viable alternative, even as a first-line treatment, in patients with different clinical phenotypes of AD, including psoriasiform AD. We performed a retrospective analysis of patients in our dermatology clinic with moderate-to-severe AD who were treated with JAKi. Among 192 patients overall, 21 had psoriasiform AD. We used the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Pruritus-Numerical Rating Scale and Dermatology Life Quality Index for considering severity scores, and reduction was observed in all 21 patients at week (W) 4, W16 and W24 of treatment. At W16, 81% and 67% achieved EASI-75 and EASI-90, respectively, while at W24 95% of patients achieved EASI-75 and 86% obtained EASI-90. No adverse event led to treatment interruption. This study confirmed the clinical effectiveness of JAKi treatment in adult patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasiform AD, with a good safety profile. These drugs are proposed as the first choice for treating this form of AD, although further studies with larger cohorts are required. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Eyelid dermatitis is a frequent reason of dermatological consultation. Its aetiology is not univocal, being contact dermatitis, both allergic and irritant, the most frequent. The primary sources of allergen exposure include cosmetics, metals, and topical medications, from direct, indirect, or airborne contact. Objectives: To define the frequency of positive patch test reactions to SIDAPA baseline series allergens, to document positive allergens, and to precise the final diagnosis in patients with eyelid involvement. Methods: A total of 8557 consecutive patients from 12 Italian Dermatology Clinics underwent patch testing with SIDAPA baseline series in 2018 and 2019. Patients were divided into two groups: (i) with eyelid involvement with or without other involved sites (E‐Group) and (ii) without eyelid involvement (NE‐Group). The final diagnosis and the frequency of positive relevant patch test reactions were evaluated. Results: E‐Group consisted of 688 patients (females 78.6%, mean age 45.3 years), 8.0% of 8557 consecutively patch‐tested patients. The final diagnosis in E‐Group was ADC in 42.4%, ICD in 34.2%, and AD in 30.5%. The highest reaction rates were elicited by nickel sulphate and methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone in both E‐Group and NE‐Group, even if these allergens were significantly more frequently positive in NE‐Group patients than in E‐Group ones. Positive patch test reactions to fragrance Mix II, dimethylaminopropylamine, and sorbitan sesquiolate were significantly more frequent in E‐Group patients than in NE‐Group ones. Conclusions: Eyelid dermatitis is a frequent dermatological complaint. Allergic contact dermatitis is the most frequent diagnosis commonly caused by nickel sulphate, isothiazolinones, and fragrances. The surfactants dimethylaminopropylamine and sorbitan sesquioleate are emerging causes of eyelid allergic contact dermatitis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Dupilumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that acts by inhibiting the interleukin (IL)-4 receptor subunit α, and hence the IL-4 and IL-13 signalling pathway. Dupilumab treatment has been linked to the onset of T helper 17-driven inflammatory diseases, including cases of seronegative arthritis and enthesitis. To date, dupilumab-associated inflammatory arthritis (DAIA) represents a relatively unknown adverse event, initially reported in single cases or case series reports. Indeed, the onset of DAIA may not be promptly recognized, and is probably underestimated. Here we have reviewed the available English literature regarding arthritis and enthesitis onset during dupilumab treatment for atopic dermatitis, aiming to improve rapid recognition and thus prompt treatment of these diseases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Managing a pregnant patient with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is often challenging. Recent data have shown that most CSU treatments in pregnant patients are second-generation H1 antihistamines (sgAHs), while data on the safety of omalizumab are scant. Objectives To evaluate, in a routine clinical practice setting, the efficacy and safety of omalizumab in patients with severe CSU refractory to sgAHs who either became pregnant during treatment or who started the drug during pregnancy. Methods We conducted a retrospective study of women aged ≥ 18 years who were pregnant, who received one or more doses of omalizumab at any time during their pregnancy or who were taking omalizumab at the time of, or in the 8 weeks before, conception. Results Twenty-nine pregnant patients were evaluated: 23 (79%) conceived a child while taking omalizumab (group A), while 6 (21%) started omalizumab treatment during pregnancy (group B). Among patients in group A, we observed 23 births (21 liveborn singletons and 1 liveborn twin pair) and 1 miscarriage. Fifteen (65%) patients discontinued omalizumab after confirming their pregnancy, while eight (35%) were exposed to omalizumab during their entire pregnancy. In group B, omalizumab was introduced at a mean (SD) 10.83 (3.60) weeks' gestation and all patients were exposed to it until the end of pregnancy. In this group, there were seven liveborn infants (five singletons and one twin pair). No adverse events, pregnancy complications or congenital anomalies in newborns were recorded in either group. Conclusions Omalizumab for CSU treatment before and during pregnancy does not appear to have negative effects on maternal or fetal outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Tralokinumab has been recently approved for the management of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). Despite its effectiveness and safety have been widely reported, there are no studies investigating factors that may affect clinical outcomes. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of tralokinumab, also to investigate possible predictive response factors that may affect the time of onset of treatment response. Methods: A monocentric retrospective real-life study was performed enrolling AD patients undergoing treatment with tralokinumab for at least 24 weeks. AD severity was assessed at baseline and at week (W)16, and W24. Similarly, treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were evaluated at each follow-up visit. Results: A total of 57 patients were enrolled. AD severity started to improve at W4, continued to improve at W16 and W24. In our cohort, we found out that gender, age, atopic comorbidities, and previous treatments did not affect treatment outcomes. However, we observed that patients with higher Pruritus-Numerical Rating Scale (‡8), relapsing form of AD, Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) £24, and Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) £3 achieved more frequently EASI75 response at W16. No significant AEs were collected. Conclusions: Our study confirmed the effectiveness and safety of tralokinumab. In particular, a higher pruritus, a relapsing course of the disease, a reduced EASI, a reduced IGA, and a brief duration of the disease seem to be associated with the fastest onset of treatment effectiveness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]