1. Randomised trial of bipolar resection vs holmium laser enucleation vs Greenlight laser vapo‐enucleation of the prostate for treatment of large benign prostate obstruction: 3‐years outcomes
- Author
-
Mohamed Soltan, Adel Nabeeh, Ahmed M. Elshal, Nasr A. El-Tabey, and Mahmoud Laymon
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Urology ,Enucleation ,Perforation (oil well) ,Prostatic Hyperplasia ,030232 urology & nephrology ,03 medical and health sciences ,Bladder outlet obstruction ,Postoperative Complications ,0302 clinical medicine ,Lower urinary tract symptoms ,Prostate ,medicine ,Humans ,Aged ,business.industry ,Transurethral Resection of Prostate ,Prostate Adenoma ,Perioperative ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Treatment Outcome ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,International Prostate Symptom Score ,Laser Therapy ,business - Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare transurethral resection in saline (TURIS), Greenlight laser vapo-enucleation of the prostate (GL.PVEP), and holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP), for controlling lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to large benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and to assess non-inferiority of 3-year re-treatment rates. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible patients with BPH (prostate size 80-150 mL) were randomly assigned to one of the intervention groups. Non-inferiority of re-treatment rate was evaluated using a one-sided test at 5% level of significance. RESULTS At the time of analysis, 60 GL.PVEP, 60 HoLEP and 62 TURIS procedures were included. Perioperative parameters were comparable between groups; however, the operative time was longer in GL.PVEP vs HoLEP and TURIS, at a mean (SD) of 92 (32) vs 73 (30) and 83 (28) min (P = 0.005); and was less effective with a mean (SD) removal of 1.2 (0.4) vs 1.7 (0.7) and 1.4 (0.6) g/min (P
- Published
- 2020