1. Outcomes and impact of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair versus open inguinal hernia repair on healthcare spending and employee absenteeism
- Author
-
Priscila R. Armijo, Nathan D. Bills, Dmitry Oleynikov, Shariq Khan, Jianying Zhang, Marsha Morien, and Gurteshwar Rana
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Adolescent ,Databases, Factual ,Demographics ,Hernia, Inguinal ,Work hours ,Cohort Studies ,03 medical and health sciences ,Postoperative Complications ,0302 clinical medicine ,Absenteeism ,Health care ,medicine ,Humans ,Retrospective Studies ,Employee Absenteeism ,business.industry ,General surgery ,Surgical wound ,Robotics ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Conversion to Open Surgery ,United States ,Inguinal hernia ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Female ,Laparoscopy ,030211 gastroenterology & hepatology ,Surgery ,business ,Hospital stay ,Abdominal surgery - Abstract
This study compares the impact of open (OIHR) versus laparoscopic (LIHR) inguinal hernia repair on healthcare spending and postoperative outcomes. The TRUVEN database was queried using ICD9 procedure codes for open, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted IHR, from 2012 to 2013. Patients > 18 years of age and continuously enrolled for 12 months postoperatively were included. Demographics, patient comorbidities, postoperative complications, pain medication use, length of hospital stay, missed work hours, postoperative visits, and overall expenditure were collected, and assessed at time of surgery and at 30-, 60-, 90-, 180-, and 365-days postoperatively. Statistical analysis was conducted using SAS, with α = 0.05. 66,116 patients were included (LIHR: N = 23,010; OIHR: N = 43,106). Robotic-assisted procedures were excluded due to small sample size (N = 61). The largest demographic was males between 55 and 64 years. LIHR had fewer surgical wound complications than OIHR (LIHR: 0.3%; OIHR: 0.5%, p = 0.007), less utilization of pain medication (LIHR: 23.3%; OIHR: 28.5%; p
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF