Search

Purpose: Proliferation of T-follicular helper (TFH) CD4+ T cells is a postulated pathogenic mechanism for T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas (T-NHL). The inducible T-cell costimulator (ICOS) is highly expressed by TFH, representing a potential target. MEDI-570 is a monoclonal antibody against ICOS, which eliminates ICOS+ cells in preclinical models. Patients and Methods: We report the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and clinical activity of MEDI-570 in T-NHL. NCI-9930 is a phase I, first-in-human study of MEDI-570 in relapsed/refractory malignant T-NHL known to express ICOS. MEDI-570 was administered intravenously every 3 weeks for up to 12 cycles. Primary endpoints were safety, dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), and recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Secondary and exploratory endpoints included efficacy parameters and various correlative studies. This study is supported by the National Cancer Institute (NCT02520791). Results: Twenty-three patients were enrolled and received MEDI-570 at five dose levels (0.01–3 mg/kg). Sixteen (70%) had angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL); median age was 67 years (29–86) and the median prior lines of therapies was 3 (1–16). Most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were decreased CD4+ T cells (57%), lymphopenia (22%), anemia (13%), and infusion-related reactions (9%). No DLTs were observed. The RP2D was determined at 3 mg/kg. Analysis of T-cell subsets showed reductions in CD4+ICOS+ T cells reflecting its effects on TFH cells. The response rate in AITL was 44%. Conclusions: MEDI-570 was well tolerated and showed promising clinical activity in refractory AITL. MEDI-570 resulted in sustained reduction of ICOS+ T lymphocytes.

Supplemental Figure 2. MEDI-570 effects on lymphocyte and leukocyte populations. Baseline-normalized, absolute counts (ABS) of circulating cell populations were plotted on study days 1, 7, 14 and 21 from patients enrolled in each dose group as indicated. A) Total CD3+CD8+ cytotoxic T cells B) CD14+ monocytes C) CD3-CD56+ and/or CD16+ NK cells D) CD3-CD19+ B cells.

Supplemental Figure 1. CD4 count recovery after end of treatment (by local site collection)

Purpose:Proliferation of T-follicular helper (TFH) CD4+ T cells is a postulated pathogenic mechanism for T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas (T-NHL). The inducible T-cell costimulator (ICOS) is highly expressed by TFH, representing a potential target. MEDI-570 is a monoclonal antibody against ICOS, which eliminates ICOS+ cells in preclinical models.Patients and Methods:We report the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and clinical activity of MEDI-570 in T-NHL. NCI-9930 is a phase I, first-in-human study of MEDI-570 in relapsed/refractory malignant T-NHL known to express ICOS. MEDI-570 was administered intravenously every 3 weeks for up to 12 cycles. Primary endpoints were safety, dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), and recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Secondary and exploratory endpoints included efficacy parameters and various correlative studies. This study is supported by the National Cancer Institute (NCT02520791).Results:Twenty-three patients were enrolled and received MEDI-570 at five dose levels (0.01–3 mg/kg). Sixteen (70%) had angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL); median age was 67 years (29–86) and the median prior lines of therapies was 3 (1–16). Most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were decreased CD4+ T cells (57%), lymphopenia (22%), anemia (13%), and infusion-related reactions (9%). No DLTs were observed. The RP2D was determined at 3 mg/kg. Analysis of T-cell subsets showed reductions in CD4+ICOS+ T cells reflecting its effects on TFH cells. The response rate in AITL was 44%.Conclusions:MEDI-570 was well tolerated and showed promising clinical activity in refractory AITL. MEDI-570 resulted in sustained reduction of ICOS+ T lymphocytes.

Supplemental Tables and Protocol Description

Supplemental Figure 3. Representative baseline pre-treatment tumor specimen of a patient with AITL (H&E, ICOS staining and CD3 staining by IHC)

Marker genes for the monocyte-macrophage-DC subpopulations identified in Supplementary Figure 5H. Only genes with adjusted p-value < 0.01 and average log fold-change > 0.3 were included. gene, gene name; p_val, p-value calculated based on Wilcoxon test; avg_logFC, log fold-change of the average expression between the given cluster and all other clusters; pct.1, fraction of gene-expressing cells in the given cluster; pct.2, fraction of gene-expressing cells in all other clusters; pct.diff, Difference between the percentage of gene-expressing cells in the given cluster and all other clusters; p_val_adj, Bonferroni adjusted p-value; cluster, cluster annotation based on the gene markers identified; resolution, clustering resolution parameter used in Seurat.

Pharmacodynamics of STAT3 ASO in CT26 STK11 KO model. (A) Percentage of CD45+ immune cells among live cells from untreated or drug-treated STK11 KO CT26 tumors as indicated. (B) Percentage of Ly6G+ granulocytic cells among live CD45+ cells. (C) Percentage of intratumoral CD103+ cDC1 dendritic cells among CD45+ immune cells. (D) CD86 MFI of CD103+ cDC1s. (E) Percentage of migratory DC among CD45+ cells in TDLN of tumor engrafted mice. (F) CD86 MFI of these migratory DC in TDLNs. (G) Flow cytometry plots of CD86 levels on TDLN migratory DC. (H) Percentage of CD64+ CD11b+ myeloid cells among live intratumoral CD45+ cells. (I) Flow cytometry plots of CD86 on these CD64+ CD11b+ myeloid cells. (J) Percentages of MHCII+ CD206+ intratumoral myeloid cells. (K) Percentage of MHCII+ CD163+ intratumoral myeloid cells.

Supplementary Appendix

Mutations in the STK11 (LKB1) gene regulate resistance to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade. This study evaluated this association in patients with nonsquamous non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) enrolled in three phase I/II trials. STK11 mutations were associated with resistance to the anti–PD-L1 antibody durvalumab (alone/with the anti-CTLA4 antibody tremelimumab) independently of KRAS mutational status, highlighting STK11 as a potential driver of resistance to checkpoint blockade. Retrospective assessments of tumor tissue, whole blood, and serum revealed a unique immune phenotype in patients with STK11 mutations, with increased expression of markers associated with neutrophils (i.e., CXCL2, IL6), Th17 contexture (i.e., IL17A), and immune checkpoints. Associated changes were observed in the periphery. Reduction of STAT3 in the tumor microenvironment using an antisense oligonucleotide reversed immunotherapy resistance in preclinical STK11 knockout models. These results suggest that STK11 mutations may hinder response to checkpoint blockade through mechanisms including suppressive myeloid cell biology, which could be reversed by STAT3-targeted therapy.Significance:Patients with nonsquamous STK11-mutant (STK11mut) NSCLC are less likely than STK11 wild-type (STK11wt) patients to respond to anti–PD-L1 ± anti-CTLA4 immunotherapies, and their tumors show increased expression of genes and cytokines that activate STAT3 signaling. Preclinically, STAT3 modulation reverses this resistance, suggesting STAT3-targeted agents as potential combination partners for immunotherapies in STK11mut NSCLC.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 2659

Supplementary Figure S1. Flow diagram of patients included in the PK analysis, exposure-response analysis, and PD analysis datasets

Purpose:A novel single-dose regimen of 300 mg tremelimumab in combination with durvalumab [Single Tremelimumab Regular Interval Durvalumab (STRIDE)] has demonstrated a favorable benefit-risk profile in the phase I/II Study 22 (NCT02519348) and phase III HIMALAYA study (NCT03298451). This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics, exposure–response, and exposure–pharmacodynamics relationships of tremelimumab in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC).Patients and Methods:A previous tremelimumab population pharmacokinetic model was validated using data from parts 2 and 3 of Study 22. Exposure–response analyses explored relationships of tremelimumab exposure with efficacy and safety. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics relationships were evaluated using linear and nonlinear regression models.Results:The observed pharmacokinetics of tremelimumab in uHCC were consistent with predictions; no significant covariates were identified. Tremelimumab exposure was not significantly associated with adverse events, objective response rate, or progression-free survival. Overall survival (OS) was longer for patients with tremelimumab exposure, minimum serum drug concentration (Cmin1) ≥ median versus Cmin1 < median (18.99 months vs. 10.97 months), but this exposure-survival analysis might be confounded with baseline characteristics of albumin level and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, which had a significant impact on OS (P = 0.0004 and 0.0001, respectively). The predicted Cmin1 of tremelimumab in STRIDE regimen (12.9 μg/mL) was greater than the estimated concentration of tremelimumab eliciting half-maximal increases (EC50 = 5.24 μg/mL) in CD8+Ki67+ T-cell counts.Conclusions:Our findings support novel insights into tremelimumab pharmacokinetics and exposure–response relationships in HCC and support the clinical utility of the STRIDE regimen in patients with uHCC.

Supplementary Data for publication

The 15th edition of the Workshop on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis (15th WRIB) was held on 27 September to 1 October 2021. Even with a last-minute move from in-person to virtual, an overwhelmingly high number of nearly 900 professionals representing pharma and biotech companies, contract research organizations (CROs), and multiple regulatory agencies still eagerly convened to actively discuss the most current topics of interest in bioanalysis. The 15th WRIB included three Main Workshops and seven Specialized Workshops that together spanned 1 week in order to allow exhaustive and thorough coverage of all major issues in bioanalysis, biomarkers, immunogenicity, gene therapy, cell therapy and vaccines. Moreover, in-depth workshops on biomarker assay development and validation (BAV) (focused on clarifying the confusion created by the increased use of the term “context of use” [COU]); mass spectrometry of proteins (therapeutic, biomarker and transgene); state-of-the-art cytometry innovation and validation; and critical reagent and positive control generation were the special features of the 15th edition. This 2021 White Paper encompasses recommendations emerging from the extensive discussions held during the workshop, and is aimed to provide the bioanalytical community with key information and practical solutions on topics and issues addressed, in an effort to enable advances in scientific excellence, improved quality and better regulatory compliance. Due to its length, the 2021 edition of this comprehensive White Paper has been divided into three parts for editorial reasons. This publication (Part 2) covers the recommendations on ISR for Biomarkers, Liquid Biopsies, Spectral Cytometry, Inhalation/Oral & Multispecific Biotherapeutics, Accuracy/LLOQ for Flow Cytometry. Part 1A (Endogenous Compounds, Small Molecules, Complex Methods, Regulated Mass Spec of Large Molecules, Small Molecule, PoC), Part 1B (Regulatory Agencies' Inputs on Bioanalysis, Biomarkers, Immunogenicity, Gene & Cell Therapy and Vaccine) and Part 3 (TAb/NAb, Viral Vector CDx, Shedding Assays; CRISPR/Cas9 & CAR-T Immunogenicity; PCR & Vaccine Assay Performance; ADA Assay Comparability & Cut Point Appropriateness) are published in volume 14 of Bioanalysis, issues 9 and 11 (2022), respectively.

Visits after Day 57 were excluded for visual purposes. The excluded visits were: Days 71, 85, 99, 127, 155, 183, 211, 239, 267, 295, 323 and 351.

Purpose:The safety and preliminary efficacy of MEDI1873, an agonistic IgG1 fusion protein targeting glucocorticoid-induced TNF receptor–related protein (GITR), were evaluated in an open-label, first-in-human, phase I, dose escalation study in previously treated patients with advanced solid tumors.Patients and Methods:Two single-patient cohorts at 1.5 and 3 mg i.v. were followed by 3+3 dose escalation in six cohorts at 7.5, 25, 75, 250, 500, and 750 mg, all every 2 weeks, for up to 52 weeks. Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability, dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), and MTD. Secondary endpoints included antitumor activity, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and pharmacodynamics.Results:Forty patients received MEDI1873. Three experienced DLTs: grade 3 worsening tumor pain (250 mg); grade 3 nausea, vomiting, and headache (500 mg); and grade 3 non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (750 mg). An MTD was not reached and treatment was well tolerated up to 500 mg. Most common treatment-related adverse events were headache (25%), infusion-related reaction (17.5%), and decreased appetite (17.5%). MEDI1873 exposure was dose proportional. Antidrug–antibody incidence was low. MEDI1873 increased peripheral CD4+ effector memory T-cell proliferation as well as cytokines associated with effector T-cell activation at dose levels ≥75 mg. The best response was stable disease (SD) in 17 patients (42.5%), including 1 unconfirmed partial response. Eight patients (20.0%) had SD ≥24 weeks.Conclusions:MEDI1873 showed acceptable safety up to 500 mg i.v. every 2 weeks with pharmacodynamics activity, and prolonged SD in some patients. However, further development is not planned because of lack of demonstrated tumor response.

Changes in peripheral GITR+ effector memory T-cells from baseline were measured in the 25 mg, 75 mg, 250 mg, and 500 mg cohorts.

Purpose:PD-L1 is upregulated in glioblastoma and supports immunosuppression. We evaluated PD-L1 blockade with durvalumab among glioblastoma cohorts and investigated potential biomarkers.Patients and Methods:MGMT unmethylated newly diagnosed patients received radiotherapy plus durvalumab (cohort A; n = 40). Bevacizumab-naïve, recurrent patients received durvalumab alone (cohort B; n = 31) or in combination with standard bevacizumab (cohort B2; n = 33) or low-dose bevacizumab (cohort B3; n = 33). Bevacizumab-refractory patients received durvalumab plus bevacizumab (cohort C; n = 22). Primary endpoints were: OS-12 (A), PFS-6 (B, B2, B3), and OS-6 (C). Exploratory biomarkers included: a systematic, quantitative, and phenotypic evaluation of circulating immune cells; tumor mutational burden (TMB); and tumor immune activation signature (IAS).Results:No cohort achieved the primary efficacy endpoint. Outcome was comparable among recurrent, bevacizumab-naïve cohorts. No unexpected toxicities were observed. A widespread reduction of effector immune cell subsets was noted among recurrent patients compared with newly diagnosed patients that was partially due to dexamethasone use. A trend of increased CD8+Ki67+ T cells at day 15 was noted among patients who achieved the primary endpoint and were not on dexamethasone. Neither TMB nor IAS predicted outcome.Conclusions:Patients with recurrent glioblastoma have markedly lower baseline levels of multiple circulating immune cell subsets compared with newly diagnosed patients. An early increase in systemic Ki67+CD8+ cells may warrant further evaluation as a potential biomarker of therapeutic benefit among patients with glioblastoma undergoing checkpoint therapy. Dexamethasone decreased immune cell subsets. PD-L1 blockade and combination with standard or reduced dose bevacizumab was ineffective.

(A) Changes from baseline were measured in peripheral CD4+ Ki67+ T cells in the 25 mg, 75 mg, 250 mg, and 500 mg cohorts. (B) The associations between peripheral IFNy and GITR. GITR molecule equivalents of soluble fluorescence (MESF) were assessed.

Supplementary Data from Circulating Immune Cell and Outcome Analysis from the Phase II Study of PD-L1 Blockade with Durvalumab for Newly Diagnosed and Recurrent Glioblastoma

Supplementary Table 1. Characteristics of patients with prolonged SD ({greater than or equal to}24 weeks)

Purpose:A novel single-dose regimen of 300 mg tremelimumab in combination with durvalumab [Single Tremelimumab Regular Interval Durvalumab (STRIDE)] has demonstrated a favorable benefit-risk profile in the phase I/II Study 22 (NCT02519348) and phase III HIMALAYA study (NCT03298451). This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics, exposure–response, and exposure–pharmacodynamics relationships of tremelimumab in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC).Patients and Methods:A previous tremelimumab population pharmacokinetic model was validated using data from parts 2 and 3 of Study 22. Exposure–response analyses explored relationships of tremelimumab exposure with efficacy and safety. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics relationships were evaluated using linear and nonlinear regression models.Results:The observed pharmacokinetics of tremelimumab in uHCC were consistent with predictions; no significant covariates were identified. Tremelimumab exposure was not significantly associated with adverse events, objective response rate, or progression-free survival. Overall survival (OS) was longer for patients with tremelimumab exposure, minimum serum drug concentration (Cmin1) ≥ median versus Cmin1 < median (18.99 months vs. 10.97 months), but this exposure-survival analysis might be confounded with baseline characteristics of albumin level and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, which had a significant impact on OS (P = 0.0004 and 0.0001, respectively). The predicted Cmin1 of tremelimumab in STRIDE regimen (12.9 μg/mL) was greater than the estimated concentration of tremelimumab eliciting half-maximal increases (EC50 = 5.24 μg/mL) in CD8+Ki67+ T-cell counts.Conclusions:Our findings support novel insights into tremelimumab pharmacokinetics and exposure–response relationships in HCC and support the clinical utility of the STRIDE regimen in patients with uHCC.

PURPOSE This phase I/II study evaluated tremelimumab (anticytotoxic T-lymphocyte–associated antigen-4 monoclonal antibody) and durvalumab (antiprogrammed death ligand-1 monoclonal antibody) as monotherapies and in combination for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), including a novel regimen featuring a single, priming dose of tremelimumab (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02519348 ). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with HCC who had progressed on, were intolerant to, or refused sorafenib were randomly assigned to receive T300 + D (tremelimumab 300 mg plus durvalumab 1,500 mg [one dose each during the first cycle] followed by durvalumab 1,500 mg once every 4 weeks), durvalumab monotherapy (1,500 mg once every 4 weeks), tremelimumab monotherapy (750 mg once every 4 weeks [seven doses] and then once every 12 weeks), or T75 + D (tremelimumab 75 mg once every 4 weeks plus durvalumab 1,500 mg once every 4 weeks [four doses] followed by durvalumab 1,500 mg once every 4 weeks). Safety was the primary end point. Secondary end points included objective response rate (ORR) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1 and overall survival; exploratory end points included circulating lymphocyte profiles. RESULTS A total of 332 patients were enrolled (T300 + D, n = 75; durvalumab, n = 104; tremelimumab, n = 69; and T75 + D, n = 84). Tolerability was acceptable across arms, with grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events occurring in 37.8%, 20.8%, 43.5%, and 24.4%, respectively. Confirmed ORRs (95% CI) were 24.0% (14.9 to 35.3), 10.6% (5.4 to 18.1), 7.2% (2.4 to 16.1), and 9.5% (4.2 to 17.9), respectively. An early expansion of CD8+ lymphocytes was associated with response across arms, with highest proliferating CD8+ lymphocyte levels occurring in the T300 + D arm. The median (95% CI) overall survival was 18.7 (10.8 to 27.3), 13.6 (8.7 to 17.6), 15.1 (11.3 to 20.5), and 11.3 (8.4 to 15.0) months in the T300 + D, durvalumab, tremelimumab, and T75 + D arms, respectively. CONCLUSION All regimens were found to be tolerable and clinically active; however, the T300 + D regimen demonstrated the most encouraging benefit-risk profile. The unique pharmacodynamic activity and association with ORR of the T300 + D regimen further support its continued evaluation in HCC.

Mutations in the STK11 (LKB1) gene regulate resistance to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade. This study evaluated this association in patients with nonsquamous non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) enrolled in three phase I/II trials. STK11 mutations were associated with resistance to the anti–PD-L1 antibody durvalumab (alone/with the anti-CTLA4 antibody tremelimumab) independently of KRAS mutational status, highlighting STK11 as a potential driver of resistance to checkpoint blockade. Retrospective assessments of tumor tissue, whole blood, and serum revealed a unique immune phenotype in patients with STK11 mutations, with increased expression of markers associated with neutrophils (i.e., CXCL2, IL6), Th17 contexture (i.e., IL17A), and immune checkpoints. Associated changes were observed in the periphery. Reduction of STAT3 in the tumor microenvironment using an antisense oligonucleotide reversed immunotherapy resistance in preclinical STK11 knockout models. These results suggest that STK11 mutations may hinder response to checkpoint blockade through mechanisms including suppressive myeloid cell biology, which could be reversed by STAT3-targeted therapy. Significance: Patients with nonsquamous STK11-mutant (STK11mut) NSCLC are less likely than STK11 wild-type (STK11wt) patients to respond to anti–PD-L1 ± anti-CTLA4 immunotherapies, and their tumors show increased expression of genes and cytokines that activate STAT3 signaling. Preclinically, STAT3 modulation reverses this resistance, suggesting STAT3-targeted agents as potential combination partners for immunotherapies in STK11mut NSCLC. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 2659

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is frequently locally advanced, but has a high risk of recurrence after initial treatment. Immune checkpoint blockade with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors has revolutionized treatment in the recurrent setting, but resistance to these therapies frequently occurs. Combination of checkpoint inhibitors with the ATR inhibitor ceralasertib could provide an exciting opportunity, with encouraging clinical activity reported in melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer (Kwon et al. 2022; Kim et al. 2022; Besse et al. OA15.05 IASLC 2022 WCLC). This phase 1b trial provided a unique opportunity to understand the immunomodulatory impact of DNA Damage Response (DDR) inhibitors in a clinical setting. NCT03022409 is an open-label, randomized window of opportunity trial where patients with HNSCC were treated with either the PARP inhibitor olaparib (300mg BID) or ceralasertib (160mg BID) for 9-21 days, prior to definitive surgery (or on-treatment biopsy). 21 patients were randomized; n=12 to ceralasertib and n=9 to olaparib, and ceralasertib data will be presented here. Translational endpoints on frozen and fixed tumor biopsies included spatial pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamic biomarkers, multiplexed fluorescence of tumor infiltrating immune cells and gene expression panels. Blood assessments included cytokine detection, immune cell phenotyping and gene expression. Primary endpoint analysis utilized a bespoke prognostic immune-focused gene signature and secondary endpoint an IHC immunoscore, both aimed to measure if tumors would shift from a ‘cold’ to ‘hot/active’ immune state. We observed an ‘on-drug’ selective suppression of proliferating Ki67+ T-cells (but not total T-cells) in the tumor microenvironment and periphery, followed by a repopulation and median rebound of 63.8% and 187.5% above baseline levels for peripheral helper (CD4+Ki67+; n=8) and cytotoxic (CD8+Ki67+; n=7) T-cells respectively, when ceralasertib dose stopped. IL-12 plasma cytokine levels dropped on ceralasertib treatment and returned to baseline levels ‘off-drug’ in 8/10 patients. Type-I interferon (IFN1) gene expression associated signatures were also upregulated in PBMCs, suggestive of an immune priming effect. 0/2 and 2/4 patients on ceralasertib met their primary and secondary endpoints respectively, however, interpretation is limited due to small numbers of evaluable patients. 1 patient had a grade 3 serious adverse event of chest pain in the ceralasertib arm. There were no unexpected safety findings for either drug and adverse events were generally low grade. The translational data has generated new insights into the immunomodulatory effect of ceralasertib. Further evaluation of the combination of ceralasertib with immune checkpoint blockade is warranted to explore this novel immune mechanism of action. Citation Format: Gemma N. Jones, Sonia Iyer, Marta Milo, Pei-Jen Lou, Melonie A. Nance, Carlos A. Gomez-Roca, Nathan Standifer, Paola Marco-Casanova, Shaan Gill, Michael Surace, Richard Bystry, Maria Alexandrova, Sophie Willis, Jaime Rodriguez-Canales, Andreas Dannhorn, Bienvenu Loembé, Alan Lau, Natalia Lukashchuk, Elizabeth A. Harrington, Elhan Sanai, Emma Dean, Umamaheswar Duvvuri. Immunomodulatory effects of the ATR inhibitor ceralasertib in a window of opportunity biomarker trial in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 2 (Clinical Trials and Late-Breaking Research); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(8_Suppl):Abstract nr CT198.

The 15th edition of the Workshop on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis (15th WRIB) was held on 27 September to 1 October 2021. Even with a last-minute move from in-person to virtual, an overwhelmingly high number of nearly 900 professionals representing pharma and biotech companies, contract research organizations (CROs), and multiple regulatory agencies still eagerly convened to actively discuss the most current topics of interest in bioanalysis. The 15th WRIB included three Main Workshops and seven Specialized Workshops that together spanned 1 week in order to allow exhaustive and thorough coverage of all major issues in bioanalysis, biomarkers, immunogenicity, gene therapy, cell therapy and vaccines. Moreover, in-depth workshops on biomarker assay development and validation (BAV) (focused on clarifying the confusion created by the increased use of the term "context of use" [COU]); mass spectrometry of proteins (therapeutic, biomarker and transgene); state-of-the-art cytometry innovation and validation; and critical reagent and positive control generation were the special features of the 15th edition. This 2021 White Paper encompasses recommendations emerging from the extensive discussions held during the workshop, and is aimed to provide the bioanalytical community with key information and practical solutions on topics and issues addressed, in an effort to enable advances in scientific excellence, improved quality and better regulatory compliance. Due to its length, the 2021 edition of this comprehensive White Paper has been divided into three parts for editorial reasons. This publication (Part 2) covers the recommendations on ISR for Biomarkers, Liquid Biopsies, Spectral Cytometry, Inhalation/OralMultispecific Biotherapeutics, Accuracy/LLOQ for Flow Cytometry. Part 1A (Endogenous Compounds, Small Molecules, Complex Methods, Regulated Mass Spec of Large Molecules, Small Molecule, PoC), Part 1B (Regulatory Agencies' Inputs on Bioanalysis, Biomarkers, Immunogenicity, GeneCell Therapy and Vaccine) and Part 3 (TAb/NAb, Viral Vector CDx, Shedding Assays; CRISPR/Cas9CAR-T Immunogenicity; PCRVaccine Assay Performance; ADA Assay ComparabilityCut Point Appropriateness) are published in volume 14 of Bioanalysis, issues 9 and 11 (2022), respectively.

Purpose: PD-L1 is upregulated in glioblastoma and supports immunosuppression. We evaluated PD-L1 blockade with durvalumab among glioblastoma cohorts and investigated potential biomarkers. Patients and Methods: MGMT unmethylated newly diagnosed patients received radiotherapy plus durvalumab (cohort A; n = 40). Bevacizumab-naïve, recurrent patients received durvalumab alone (cohort B; n = 31) or in combination with standard bevacizumab (cohort B2; n = 33) or low-dose bevacizumab (cohort B3; n = 33). Bevacizumab-refractory patients received durvalumab plus bevacizumab (cohort C; n = 22). Primary endpoints were: OS-12 (A), PFS-6 (B, B2, B3), and OS-6 (C). Exploratory biomarkers included: a systematic, quantitative, and phenotypic evaluation of circulating immune cells; tumor mutational burden (TMB); and tumor immune activation signature (IAS). Results: No cohort achieved the primary efficacy endpoint. Outcome was comparable among recurrent, bevacizumab-naïve cohorts. No unexpected toxicities were observed. A widespread reduction of effector immune cell subsets was noted among recurrent patients compared with newly diagnosed patients that was partially due to dexamethasone use. A trend of increased CD8+Ki67+ T cells at day 15 was noted among patients who achieved the primary endpoint and were not on dexamethasone. Neither TMB nor IAS predicted outcome. Conclusions: Patients with recurrent glioblastoma have markedly lower baseline levels of multiple circulating immune cell subsets compared with newly diagnosed patients. An early increase in systemic Ki67+CD8+ cells may warrant further evaluation as a potential biomarker of therapeutic benefit among patients with glioblastoma undergoing checkpoint therapy. Dexamethasone decreased immune cell subsets. PD-L1 blockade and combination with standard or reduced dose bevacizumab was ineffective.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are designed to activate exhausted tumor-reactive T cells thereby leading to tumor regression. Durvalumab, an ICI that binds to the programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) molecule, is approved as a consolidation therapy for treatment of patients with stage III, unresectable, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Immunophenotypic analysis of circulating immune cells revealed increases in circulating proliferating CD4 + and CD8 + T cells earlier after durvalumab treatment. To examine durvalumab’s mechanism of action and identify potential predictive biomarkers, we assessed the circulating T cells phenotypes and TCR genes of 71 NSCLC patients receiving durvalumab enrolled in a Phase I trial (NCT01693562, September 14, 2012). Next-generation sequencing of TCR repertoire was performed on these NSCLC patients’ peripheral blood samples at baseline and day 15. Though patients’ TCR repertoire diversity showed mixed responses to the treatment, patients exhibiting increased diversity on day 15 attained significantly longer overall survival (OS) (median OS was not reached vs 17.2 months for those with decreased diversity, p = 0.015). We applied network analysis to assess convergent T cell clonotypes indicative of an antigen-driven immune response. Patients with larger TCR clusters had improved OS (median OS was not reached vs 13.1 months for patients with smaller TCR clusters, p = 0.013). Early TCR repertoire diversification after durvalumab therapy for NSCLC may be predictive of increased survival and provides a mechanistic basis for durvalumab pharmacodynamic activity. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00262-020-02833-z.

Mutations in the

Background Emerging data suggest poor outcome to anti- PD(L)1 blocking agents in patients with STK11mut tumors1. In the current study, we undertook in-depth translational evaluations of three Ph1/Ph2 independent studies of Durvalumab ± Tremelimumab to elucidate the biology associated with STK11 mutations leading to reduced clinical response in patients with non-squamous NSCLC. Methods Mutational status was evaluated by ctDNA or Foundation One CDx as previously described1. RNA sequencing was conducted on baseline frozen biopsies (N=70). Selected proteins (N=66) were measured by Myriad RBM multiplexed immunoassays on baseline serum (n=91). Screening and longitudinal whole blood was assessed for circulating quantities of T, B or NK cells and activated or memory T cell subsets using bioanalytically-validated, flow cytometry-based immunophenotyping assays. Exploratory analyses of translational endpoints according to STK11 mutational status were conducted by Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Results In the periphery, a reduced number (> 2-fold decreased in median quantities) of NK cells, CD4+ effector memory, CD4+ HLA-DR+, CD8+ effector memory and CD8+ HLA-DR+ T cells was observed at baseline and following treatments in patients with STK11mut vs. STK11wt tumors. At baseline, increased levels of IL6 (p=0.002) and the neutrophil-attracting cytokine IL8 (p=0.02) were found in serum of patients with STK11mut tumors. In the tumor microenvironment, significantly increased expression (p 2) of markers associated with neutrophils, (i.e. CXCL2, IL6, CSF3), Th17 contexture (i.e. IL17A) and immune checkpoints (i.e. KIRs, PD-L1) was found in STK11mut vs. STK11wt tumors. Conclusions The poor outcomes to immunotherapy observed in NSCLC patients with STK11mut tumors might be determined by a compromised peripheral and intra-tumoral immune phenotype. These results might help the development of novel therapeutic interventions able to unleash response to immune checkpoints in NSCLC patients harboring STK11 mutations. Trial Registration NCT01693562, NCT02087423, NCT02000947 Reference Jure Kunkel Met al, JCO. 2018.36.15_suppl.3028.

Background Despite the encouraging successes of immune checkpoint inhibitors, many patients do not benefit and are either refractory or relapse. The mechanisms of refractory or relapsed disease following PD-(L)1 blockade are largely unknown. To identify characteristics associated with refractory or relapsed disease we explored the immune and genomic landscape of samples derived from NSCLC patients who previously received PD-(L)1 blockade and had blood and fresh tumor biopsies collected at the time of progression. Methods Patient response categories were defined prospectively; ‘refractory’ defined as progression within 16 weeks of initiating PD-(L)1 and ‘relapse’ defined as initial clinical benefit (CR, PR, SD) followed by progression. RNAseq (n=52) and PD-L1 IHC (n=22) were performed on tumor tissue. Immune profiling of whole blood was assessed using flow cytometry or Biomark HD (Fluidigm) gene expression panel (n=54 and n=62, respectively). Differential gene expression was defined as unadjusted p 1.5. Pathways analysis was conducted by David tool. Patient samples were collected during screening for clinical trial of second line immunotherapy. Written informed consent was obtained from the patients for publication of this abstract. Results In patients with NSCLC previously treated with PD-(L)1 blockade, tumors of relapsed patients were characterized by increased expression of genes associated with interferon signaling (e.g. CXCL9, SPIC, IFNg), immune suppression (e.g. ARG1, TGFB), immune exhaustion (e.g. ADORA2A), and increased PD-L1 expression (by gene expression and IHC). Refractory disease was associated with increased cadherin signaling and calcium-dependent-cell-adhesion gene expression pathways. In the periphery, reduced quantities of B cells and activated (HLA-DR+ or CD38+) or proliferating (Ki67+) CD8+ T cells were observed in refractory patients. Conclusions The tumor and peripheral compartments of patients with NSCLC previously treated with PD-(L)1 blockade differ based on prior response. Relapsed patients tend to have signals of sturdy immune activation and chronic inflammation thus ultimately leading to immune exhaustion. These results may help inform rational therapeutic strategies to overcome resistance to PD-(L)1 blockade in NSCLC. Trial Registration NCT02000947 Ethics Approval Research on human samples here analyzed have been performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Consent Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this abstract.

In the development of therapeutic compounds that bind cell surface molecules, it is critical to demonstrate the extent to which the drug engages its target. For cell-associated targets, flow cytometry is well-suited to monitor drug-to-target engagement through receptor occupancy assays (ROA). The technology allows for the identification of specific cell subsets within heterogeneous populations and the detection of nonabundant cellular antigens. There are numerous challenges in the design, development, and implementation of robust ROA. Among the most difficult challenges are situations where there is receptor modulation or when the target-antigen is expressed at low levels. When the therapeutic molecules are bi-specific and bind multiple targets, these challenges are increased. This manuscript discusses the challenges and proposes best practices for designing, optimizing, and validating ROA.

Purpose: The safety and preliminary efficacy of MEDI1873, an agonistic IgG1 fusion protein targeting glucocorticoid-induced TNF receptor–related protein (GITR), were evaluated in an open-label, first-in-human, phase I, dose escalation study in previously treated patients with advanced solid tumors. Patients and Methods: Two single-patient cohorts at 1.5 and 3 mg i.v. were followed by 3+3 dose escalation in six cohorts at 7.5, 25, 75, 250, 500, and 750 mg, all every 2 weeks, for up to 52 weeks. Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability, dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), and MTD. Secondary endpoints included antitumor activity, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and pharmacodynamics. Results: Forty patients received MEDI1873. Three experienced DLTs: grade 3 worsening tumor pain (250 mg); grade 3 nausea, vomiting, and headache (500 mg); and grade 3 non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (750 mg). An MTD was not reached and treatment was well tolerated up to 500 mg. Most common treatment-related adverse events were headache (25%), infusion-related reaction (17.5%), and decreased appetite (17.5%). MEDI1873 exposure was dose proportional. Antidrug–antibody incidence was low. MEDI1873 increased peripheral CD4+ effector memory T-cell proliferation as well as cytokines associated with effector T-cell activation at dose levels ≥75 mg. The best response was stable disease (SD) in 17 patients (42.5%), including 1 unconfirmed partial response. Eight patients (20.0%) had SD ≥24 weeks. Conclusions: MEDI1873 showed acceptable safety up to 500 mg i.v. every 2 weeks with pharmacodynamics activity, and prolonged SD in some patients. However, further development is not planned because of lack of demonstrated tumor response.

Background:T-follicular helper (TFH) cells are a novel CD4+ T-cell subset that participates in germinal center maintenance/proliferation. Proliferation of TFH is a postulated mechanism of pathogenesis for T-cell lymphomas (AITL, PTCL and others). The inducible T-cell costimulator (ICOS) is highly expressed in TFHand hence in AITL, PTCL FH type, and some cutaneous T cell lymphomas (CTCL) and follicular lymphomas (FL). MEDI-570 is a human afucosylatedIgG1 kappa monoclonal antagonistic antibody directed against ICOS, which binds to and eliminates ICOS expressing cells in preclinical in vivo models. We investigate the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and clinical activity of ICOS blockade by MEDI-570 in T-cell lymphomas. Methods: NCI-9930 is a Phase I study of MEDI-570 in R/R malignant lymphomas. It is a 3+3 study design that evaluated 5 dose levels . MEDI-570 was administered intravenously (IV) every 3 weeks for 12 cycles. Eligibility criteria included: age >18 years, ECOG 200 cells/uL (>100 for AITL). Primary endpoints are safety of MEDI-570, dose limiting toxicities (DLT)s and its recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Secondary endpoints include: pharmacokinetics (PK), overall response rate (ORR) based on Lugano classification and progression-free survival (PFS). Exploratory endpoints include various correlative studies. This study is supported by the National Cancer Institute Experimental Therapeutics Clinical Trials Network (ETCTN) and Early Drug Development Opportunity Program (EDDOP) (NCT02520791). Results: As of June 2020, the dose escalation phase has been completed. Patients were enrolled and evaluable for safety and efficacy. Median age is 63 (range: 29-80), female/male ratio=5/13, histologic types consisted in AITL (n= 12, 71%), PTCL NOS (n=3, 18%) and CTCL (n=2, 12%). The median number of prior therapies were 7.5 (1 - 16), stage III/IV in 83%, prior autologous HCT in 18%. There were 4 partial remissions (PR) and 7 with stable disease (SD), all patients with AITL. Two patients (1 PR and 1 SD) remain on treatment. One patient completed treatment and remains in a stable PR for over a year without further treatment. One patient in PR underwent allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation (HCT) and remains in remission. The most common grade 3/4 AEs were decreased CD4+ T-cells as expected anemia (12%), hypophosphatemia (12%), thrombocytopenia (6%), infusion related reactions (6%). No DLTs were reported, and the maximum tolerated dose was not established. Initial PK analyses demonstrated that MEDI-570 systemic exposure increased in a dose-dependent manner, and a RP2D was determined. Peripheral blood flow cytometry analysis of T-cell subsets showed that MEDI-570 caused a rapid and sustained decrease in CD4+ T-cells. It also resulted in reductions in circulating of certain ICOS+ T-cells, especially on days 7-21 post treatment. Conclusion: MEDI-570 was safe, well tolerated and showed promising clinical activity in poor-risk refractory and heavily pretreated AITL. A RP2D was established. MEDI-570 results in sustained reduction of the targeted ICOS+T lymphocytes. The study continues enrolling in the expansion phase. Disclosures Chavez: Morphosys: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy; BeiGene: Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Genentech: Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy; Verastem: Consultancy; Epizyme: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy. William:Dova: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Kyowa Kirin: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Guidepoint Global: Consultancy. Brammer:Celgene Corporation: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Speakers Bureau. Smith:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Consultancy, Other: Support of parent study and funding of editorial support, Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; FortySeven: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy. Prica:astra zeneca: Honoraria; seattle genetics: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria. Zain:Kyowa Kirlin: Research Funding; Mundai Pharma: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Glenn:Genentech: Research Funding. Mehta-Shah:Verastem: Research Funding; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy; Kyowa Kirin: Consultancy; Innate Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Genetech: Research Funding; C4 Therapeutics: Consultancy; Bristol Myers-Squibb: Research Funding. Boutrin:Astrazeneca: Current Employment, Current equity holder in private company. Zhao:Astrazeneca: Current Employment, Current equity holder in private company. Cheng:Astrazeneca: Current Employment, Current equity holder in private company. Standifer:Astrazeneca: Current Employment, Current equity holder in private company. Carlesso:Astrazeneca: Current Employment, Current equity holder in private company. Siu:Shatthucks: Research Funding; Symphogen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Tessa: Consultancy; Treadwell Therapeutics: Consultancy, Current Employment; Pfizer: Research Funding; Voronol: Consultancy; Rubius Therapeutics: Consultancy; Abbvie: Research Funding; Agios: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Arvinas: Consultancy; Astellas: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Boerhinger-Ingelheim: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Glaxo Smith Kline: Research Funding; Intensity Therapeutics: Research Funding; Navire: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; Oncorus: Consultancy; Mirati: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy; Relay Therapeutics: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy.

AIMS: To characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) of moxetumomab pasudotox, an anti‐CD22 recombinant immunotoxin, in adults with relapsed or refractory hairy cell leukaemia, we examined data from a phase 1 study (Study 1001; n = 49) and from the pivotal clinical study (Study 1053; n = 74). METHODS: Data from both studies were pooled (n = 123) to develop a population PK model. Covariates included demographics, disease state, liver and kidney function, prior treatment, and antidrug antibodies (ADAs). Exposure–response and exposure–safety were analysed separately by study. A 1‐compartment model with linear elimination from the central compartment and 2 clearance (CL) rates was developed. RESULTS: Moxetumomab pasudotox was cleared more rapidly after cycle 1, day 1 (CL(1) = 24.7 L/h) than subsequently (CL(2) = 3.76 L/h), with high interindividual variability (116 and 109%, respectively). In Study 1053, patients with ADA titres >10 240 showed ~4‐fold increase in CL. Higher exposures (≥median) were related to higher response rates, capillary leak syndrome and increased creatinine (Study 1053 only), or grade ≥3 adverse events (Study 1001 only). Clinical benefits were still observed in patients with lower exposure or high ADA titres. CONCLUSION: Despite a high incidence of immunogenicity with increased clearance, moxetumomab pasudotox demonstrated efficacy in hairy cell leukaemia.

313 Background: In a phase II study in uHCC (Study 22, NCT02519348), a novel, priming combination regimen of tremelimumab (T; anti-CTLA-4) and durvalumab (D; anti-PD-L1) (T300+D) has shown favorable clinical activity vs each agent as monotherapy or vs another combination (T75+D). The analyses presented here assess the pharmacokinetics (PK) and relationships between tremelimumab exposure, as monotherapy or in combination, and safety, efficacy, and pharmacodynamics (PD) in this study. Methods: Overall, 216 pts were included in these analyses (T, n=65; T300+D, n=72; T75+D, n=79). Safety, antitumor activity, PK, PD, and immunogenicity were analyzed using standard pharmacometrics methods. A previously developed population PK model for T across solid tumors was validated using T monotherapy and combination therapy data from Study 22, including a post-hoc covariate analysis to assess the impact of covariates on individual PK parameters. Population PK and PD models related individual T exposures to safety parameters, PD, and efficacy (overall survival, OS; progression-free survival, PFS; and objective response rate, ORR). The E-R relationships for time-to-event variables OS and PFS were explored by Kaplan-Meier estimates and analyzed by Cox proportional-hazards models (CPHM). Results: For T monotherapy and T+D combinations, no significant E-S relationships were observed for grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), grade 3/4 TRAEs of special interest, and AEs leading to treatment discontinuation. Analyses of each quartile of T exposure suggest pts with higher exposure (3rd and 4th quartile) may have longer OS vs lower quartiles. The CPHManalysis showed that after accounting for prognostic factors (baseline albumin and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio), neither AUC nor Cmin appeared to be a significant factor for OS hazard. There was no significant relationship between response and ORR, PFS and any T PK exposure metric in T-treated pts. Saturable relationships (described by Emax) were observed for maximum change from baseline for proliferating T-cell counts as functions of exposure. Conclusions: The observed PK data are generally consistent with predictions based on a historical population PK model, suggesting the PK of T in uHCC pts is consistent with pts with other solid tumors. No significant relationships were observed between E-S and E-R; therefore, PK is not a significant predictor to evaluate for T efficacy or safety. Considering the small sample size limitation, still the saturable relationships observed in proliferating T-cells appear to support a dose of T300. Future studies of pooled data from Study 22 and the larger phase III HIMALAYA study (NCT03298451) will be conducted to further the characterization of E-R relationships and the development of the T300+D regimen. Clinical trial information: NCT02519348.

Background Receptor occupancy (RO) assays provide a means to measure the direct interaction of therapeutics with their cell surface targets. Free receptor assays quantify cell-surface receptors not bound by a therapeutic while total receptor assays quantify the amount of target on the cell surface. Methods We developed both a flow cytometry-based free RO assay to detect free surface CXCR4, and a total surface CXCR4 assay. In an effort to evaluate potential displacement interference, we performed in vitro experiments to compare on-cell affinity with the IC50 values from in vitro and in vivo from the free CXCR4 assay. We determined free and total surface CXCR4 on circulating blood cells in cynomolgus monkeys dosed with MEDI3185, a fully human monoclonal antibody to CXCR4. Results We devised an approach to evaluate displacement interference during assay development and showed that our free assay demonstrated little to no displacement interference. After dosing cynomolgus monkeys with MEDI3185, we observed dose-dependence in the magnitude and duration of receptor occupancy and found CXCR4 to increase on lymphocytes, monocytes, and granulocytes. In a multiple dose study, we observed time points where surface CXCR4 appeared fully occupied but MEDI3185 was not detectable in serum. These paradoxical results represented a type of assay interference, and by comparing pharmacokinetic, ADA and total CXCR4 results, the most likely reason for the free CXCR4 results was the emergence of neutralizing anti-drug antibodies (ADA). The total CXCR4 assay was unaffected by ADA and provided a reliable marker of target modulation in both in vivo studies. © 2015 The Authors Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry Published byWiley Periodicals, Inc.

There has been significant interest in combining anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents with other clinically active anticancer agents. Gefitinib, a first-generation inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase, is approved for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with sensitizing EGFR mutations. Durvalumab has demonstrated clinical activity in NSCLC and is approved for Stage III, unresectable NSCLC that has not progressed following platinum-based chemotherapy and radiotherapy. A phase I trial (NCT02088112) combining gefitinib and durvalumab was initiated to establish the safety profile of this combination in tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (TKI)-naive patients with NSCLC containing EGFR-positive sensitizing mutations. As part of this trial, paired tumor biopsies and multiple blood samples were collected for biomarker evaluation. Peripheral blood samples were analyzed for gene expression, cytokine production, immunophenotyping, and circulating DNA (ctDNA). Paired tumor biopsies were evaluated for expression of multiple proteins by immunohistochemistry, including phosphorylated EGFR (pEGFR), PD-L1, CD73, and CD8. We saw ≥50% inhibition of pEGFR in 8 of 17 paired biopsies but no consistent directional changes with PD-L1. We observed known durvalumab-mediated effects such as increases in tumor CD8+ cells (3.7 fold, p=0.011), proliferating CD8+ cells in circulation (2.4 fold, p=0.074), and increased interferon gamma (10.3 fold, p=0.01). A cohort of patients (n=10) was treated with a 28-day gefitinib run-in prior to addition of durvalumab. Sample collection during this period allowed us to evaluate the effects of gefitinib alone on immunologic readouts. While treatment with gefitinib alone resulted in ≥50% reduction of pEGFR in 5 of 8 paired tumor biopsies, its effect on expression of immune-related genes, interferon-related cytokines, and immune subpopulations was minimal. Interestingly, we saw an association between higher baseline tumor PD-L1, pEGFR or CD73 expression and a numerical trend for longer progression-free survival. Finally, analysis of ctDNA showed robust decreases in mutant EGFR could be observed as early as Day 5 of gefitinib treatment, either alone or in combination with durvalumab. Altogether, these results demonstrate that each agent had its expected downstream biologic effects and there was no antagonism between the two agents. We did not observe any novel biologic effects nor any striking synergy for known readouts. New hypotheses (i.e., high PD-L1/pEGFR/CD73) for patient selection biomarkers were identified, although more follow-up is required to determine whether they reflect combination or single-agent treatment. These studies highlight the utility of collecting biomarker samples to confirm target engagement, understand downstream effects, identify patient selection biomarkers, and explore ctDNA biomarkers. Citation Format: Tammie C. Yeh, Helen K. Angell, Vicky Rowlands, Emma V. Jones, Vidalba Rocher Ros, Alison Pritchard, Martine P. Roudier, Nathan Standifer, Mike Kuziora, Philip Martin, Kirill Peskov, Rosie Taylor, J. Carl Barrett, Ben Sidders. Exploratory biomarker analyses of tumor and peripheral blood samples from the phase I durvalumab plus gefitinib trial in EGFR-mutated NSCLC [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy; 2019 Nov 17-20; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2020;8(3 Suppl):Abstract nr B55.

International audience; This is a pivotal, multicenter, open-label study of moxetumomab pasudotox, a recombinant CD22-targeting immunotoxin, in hairy cell leukemia (HCL), a rare B cell malignancy with high CD22 expression. The study enrolled patients with relapsed/ refractory HCL who had ≥2 prior systemic therapies, including ≥1 purine nucleoside analog. Patients received moxetumomab pasudotox 40 µg/kg intravenously on days 1, 3, and 5 every 28 days for ≤6 cycles. Blinded independent central review determined disease response and minimal residual disease (MRD) status. Among 80 patients (79% males; median age, 60.0 years), durable complete response (CR) rate was 30%, CR rate was 41%, and objective response rate (CR and partial response) was 75%; 64 patients (80%) achieved hematologic remission. Among complete responders, 27 (85%) achieved MRD negativity by immunohistochemistry. The most frequent adverse events (AEs) were peripheral edema (39%), nausea (35%), fatigue (34%), and headache (33%). Treatment-related serious AEs of hemolytic uremic syndrome (7.5%) and capillary leak syndrome (5%) were reversible and generally manageable with supportive care and treatment discontinuation (6 patients; 7.5%). Moxetumomab pasudotox treatment achieved a high rate of independently assessed durable response and MRD eradication in heavily pretreated patients with HCL, with acceptable tolerability.

Receptor occupancy (RO) assays are designed to quantify the binding of therapeutics to their targets on the cell surface and are frequently used to generate pharmacodynamic (PD) biomarker data in nonclinical and clinical studies of biopharmaceuticals. When combined with the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile, RO data can establish PKPD relationships, which are crucial for informing dose decisions. RO is commonly measured by flow cytometry on fresh blood specimens and is subject to numerous technical and logistical challenges. To ensure that reliable and high quality results are generated from RO assays, careful assay design, key reagent characterization, data normalization/reporting, and thorough planning for implementation are of critical importance during development. In this article, the authors share their experiences and perspectives in these areas and discuss challenges and potential solutions when developing and implementing a flow cytometry‐based RO method in support of biopharmaceutical drug development. © 2015 The Authors Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.