Search

BACKGROUND Intracranial arterial dissections (IADs) are classically associated with the vertebrobasilar system, yet are a devastating cause of ischemic stroke within the anterior circulation. Current literature regarding the surgical management of anterior circulation IAD is lacking. As a result, data on 9 patients presenting with ischemic stroke due to spontaneous anterior circulation IAD between 2019 and 2021 were collected in a retrospective manner. Symptoms, diagnostic modalities, treatment, and outcomes are presented for each case. Patients who underwent endovascular procedures had 10-minute follow-up angiography performed to identify signs of reocclusion, which prompted initiation of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa therapy and stent placement. OBSERVATIONS Seven patients underwent emergent endovascular intervention (stenting: n = 5; thrombectomy alone: n = 2). The remaining 2 were managed medically. Two patients developed progressive flow limiting stenosis requiring further intervention, 2 developed asymptomatic progressive stenosis/occlusion with robust collateral formation and the remainder have patent vasculature upon follow up imaging at 6 to 12 months. Seven patients had a modified Rankin Scale score of 1 or less at the 3-month follow-up. LESSONS IAD is a devastating yet rare cause of anterior circulation ischemic stroke. The treatment algorithm proposed resulted in positive clinical and angiographic outcomes warranting future consideration and study in the emergent management of spontaneous anterior circulation IAD.

Background While it is thought that Borden Type I intracranial dural arteriovenous fistula (dAVF) have a benign clinical course, their management remains controversial. Methods A comparative meta-analysis was completed to evaluate the outcomes of intervention verses observation of Borden Type I intracranial dAVF. Outcome measures included: grade progression, worsening symptoms, death due to dAVF, permanent complications other than death, functional independence (mRS 0–2), and rate of death combined with permanent complication, were evaluated. Risk differences (RD) were determined using a random effects model. Results Three comparative studies combined with the authors’ institutional experience resulted in a total of 469 patients, with 279 patients who underwent intervention and 190 who were observed. There was no significant difference in dAVF grade progression between the intervention and observation arms, 1.8% vs. 0.7%, respectively (RD: 0.01, 95% CI: −0.02 to 0.04, P = 0.49), or in symptom progression occurring in 31/279 (11.1%) intervention patients and 11/190 (5.8%) observation patients (RD: 0.03, CI: −0.02 to 0.09, P = 0.28). There was also no significant difference in functional independence on follow up. However, there was a significantly higher risk of dAVF related death, permanent complication from either intervention or dAVF related ICH or stroke in the intervention group (11/279, 3.9%) compared to the observation group (0/190, 0%) (RD: 0.04, CI: 0.1 to 0.06, P = 0.007). Conclusion Intervention of Borden Type I dAVF results in a higher risk of death or permanent complication, which should be strongly considered when deciding on management of these lesions.

It is poorly understood if endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) with or without intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) better facilitates clinical outcomes in patients with acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO) ischemic stroke.A systematic literature review and meta-analysis was completed to investigate the outcomes of EVT with IVT versus direct EVT alone in acute BAO. Data was collected from the literature and pooled with the authors' institutional experience. The primary outcome measure was 90-day modified Rankin sale (mRS) of 0-2. Secondary measures were successful post-thrombectomy recanalization defined as mTICI ≥2b, 90-day mortality, and rate of symptomatic ICH.Our institutional experience combined with three multicenter studies resulted in a total of 1,127 patients included in the meta-analysis. 756 patients underwent EVT alone, while 371 were treated with EVT+IVT. Patients receiving EVT+IVT had a higher odds of achieving a 90-day mRS of ≤ 2 compared to EVT alone (OR: 1.50, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.95, P =0.002, IOn meta-analysis, EVT with bridging IVT results in superior 90-day functional outcomes and lower 90-day mortality without increase in symptomatic ICH. These findings likely deserve further validation in a randomized controlled setting.

Introduction: Hospitals have improved stroke thrombolysis times through rigorous assessment of care delays. While mobile stroke units (MSU) expedite intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke, the same rigor has not been applied to this novel setting. Methods: We reviewed all cases of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) administration onboard our mobile stroke unit in Rochester, NY since its inception in 2019. The dispatch timeline was divided into six intervals: (1) drive time, (2) onboarding time, (3) HCT collection, (4) HCT reading, (5) decision time, and (6) tPA administration. Cases in which tPA was delayed due to medical contraindications or inability to obtain consent were not included in the analysis. Results: The mean ± SD total time between MSU dispatch and tPA was 42 ± 8.4 min (range: 26-60 min; N = 53). The longest interval was (1) drive time (between dispatch and arrival, 12.0 ± 4.7 min). However, the inter-case variation was greatest in (5) decision time (between HCT reading and treatment decision, 6.3 ± 6.2 min). After ranking cases by total time, the interval that had the widest variance between the first and fourth quartiles was decision time (2.45x). The other intervals varied by a factor of 1.50x for (6) tPA administration and less than 1.00x for the other four intervals. Decision time was the interval most closely correlated with total time (Spearman’s ρ = 0.46; p = 0.00051), which was reduced in our second year of operation (38.8 from 44.6 minutes; Mann-Whitney, Z = 2.38, p = 0.02). Decision time was negatively correlated with time since inception of the MSU (Spearman’s ρ = -0.29, p = 0.037), suggesting that improvements in decision time drove improvements in overall thrombolysis time. Conclusion: The largest driver of variation in total time from emergency alert to tPA administration is provider decision time in our MSU program. This observation should be investigated in other settings but may ultimately inform MSU training and staffing.

Intra-arterial tissue plasminogen activator (IA tPA) is sometimes used in conjunction with aspiration catheters and stentrievers to achieve recanalization in endovascular thrombectomy (ET) for large vessel occlusion (LVO). Reports of safety and efficacy of this approach are limited by technical heterogeneity and sample size.We retrospectively reviewed a data set of patients undergoing ET for LVO between August 2017 and September 2020 to identify those that received IA tPA. IA tPA usage, timing and dosage was at the discretion of the operative neurosurgeon. We identified three broad categories of IA tPA administration: (1) adjunctive with the first pass; (2) salvage with subsequent passes after first pass achieved incomplete revascularization; and (3) post-thrombectomy residual distal occlusions. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were performed to test associations with recanalization, hemorrhage, and functional independence.Among 271 patients, 158 (58%) patients had IA tPA, of which 83 received adjuvant IA tPA, 60 received salvage IA tPA, and 15 received post-thrombectomy IA tPA for distal occlusions. There were no differences in demographics, stroke etiology and premorbid medications between these groups. Patients receiving salvage IA tPA had longer times from groin access to recanalization and more passes, as expected. On multivariate analysis neither adjunctive nor salvage IA tPA was significantly associated with recanalization, post-operative hemorrhage, or functional outcomes. On univariate analysis, patients receiving salvage IA tPA had lower rates of TICI 3 or 2b revascularization (80% vs. 89% adjunctive and 92% no IA tPA, p = 0.003) and higher rates of any postoperative hemorrhage (33% vs. 22% adjunctive and 19% no IA tPA, p = 0.003).In this retrospective, single-institution series, IA tPA used adjunctively or as salvage therapy in ET for LVO was not associated with recanalization, post-operative hemorrhage, or functional outcomes, suggesting IA tPA is an available modality that can be utilized in cases of recalcitrant clots.

BACKGROUNDRathke cleft cyst (RCC) has a recurrence rate of 10% to 22%, and preventing recurrence is challenging. For patients who experience persistent recurrence of RCC, placement of steroid-eluting bioabsorbable intrasellar stents has been rarely described. However, recurrences are often delayed, suggesting that dissolvable stents may not be successful long-term. The release of steroids in close proximity to the pituitary gland may also unintentionally influence the hypothalamic-adrenal-pituitary axis.OBSERVATIONSThe authors present a case of a 66-year-old woman with a persistently recurrent RCC who underwent drainage of her cyst with placement of a nonabsorbable intrasellar stent in the form of a tympanostomy tube. After repeat transsphenoidal drainage of her cyst, a tympanostomy T-tube was placed to stent open the dural aperture. Postoperatively, the patient’s condition showed improvement clinically and radiographically.LESSONSPlacement of an intrasellar stent for recurrent RCC has rarely been described. Steroid-eluting bioabsorbable stents may dissolve before RCC recurrence and may have an unintentional effect on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. The authors present the first case of nonabsorbable stent placement in the form of a tympanostomy tube for recurrence of RCC. Additional studies and longer follow-up are necessary to evaluate the long-term efficacy of both absorbable and nonabsorbable stent placement.

Background: Neuromodulatory applications such as vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) and responsive neurostimulation (RNS) are safe and effective strategies for medically intractable epilepsy secondary to complex partial seizures, but researchers have yet to compare their efficacies. Objective: The goal of this study is to compare VNS and RNS efficacy at reducing seizure frequency and complication rates in subjects with medically intractable epilepsy secondary to complex partial seizures. Methods: This is a retrospective chart review of 30 patients with medically intractable complex partial epilepsy, who underwent either VNS or RNS placement at a single institution between June 2012 and January 2016. There was a mean follow-up of 19 months. Seizure frequency reduction and complications were identified. Results: The median seizure frequency reduction was similar for VNS (66%) and RNS (58%). There was no major morbidity or mortality, and the frequency of minor complications was similar between VNS (15%) and RNS (18%). Conclusion: We found that VNS and RNS reduced the median seizure frequency similarly with no difference in morbidity or mortality. Further prospective studies are warranted as VNS and RNS therapy improves over time.

OBJECTIVE This study is a retrospective case series involving C1–2 spinal cord stimulation in patients with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) under general endotracheal anesthesia. Currently, C1–2 paddle lead placement is an accepted practice, which provides effective cervical stimulation to ameliorate upper-extremity and sometimes lower-extremity symptoms experienced by patients with CRPS. However, this technique must be performed under general endotracheal anesthesia rather than in an awake or semiconscious state due to intraoperative safety concerns and patient comfort. The authors aim to provide additional data to support the following novel technique: the use of somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) diminution data to assist with proper midline placement of C1–2 leads under general anesthesia. METHODS SSEP median nerve (MN) and posterior tibial nerve (PTN) data were collected from 6 patients undergoing placement of C1–2 leads under general anesthesia. Fluoroscopy was used as an initial guide for proper anatomical midline placement. This was followed by the activation of the spinal cord stimulator and simultaneous collection of primarily MN SSEPs as well as PTN SSEPs for physiological midline placement. Unilateral and bilateral reductions in SSEPs assisted with the correct lateralization of the lead to ensure effective postoperative coverage according to the patient's individual preoperative symptoms. RESULTS Six patients were monitored using SSEPs and repeatable, reliable MN and PTN baseline responses were obtained from all. A reduction in amplitude ranging from 5% to 87% was observed, confirming inhibition of dorsal column conduction, and an average pain relief of 63% at short-term and 64% at long-term follow-up was recorded with 6 of 6 and 5 of 6 patients responding, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Intraoperative SSEP collision study testing appears to be a safe technique to monitor placement of C1–2 paddle leads intraoperatively under general anesthesia.

Barbiturates are indicated for use during vascular neurosurgery procedures such as carotid surgery, arteriovenous malformation (AVM) surgery, cerebral aneurysm surgery, extracranial-intracranial bypass, and following significant bleeding due to AVMs or subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). These drugs are commonly used for their neuroprotective effects during focal cerebral ischemia and for their ability to treat intractable intracranial hypertension. Currently, thiopental and pentobarbital are the most frequently used barbiturates for these purposes, although methohexital and phenobarbital have been studied as well. Depending on the drug used and the desired effect, the dose administered may vary. Additionally, barbiturates are known to cause significant, severe side effects including depression of cardiac output, increased liver enzymes, increased risk of cardiac arrhythmia, lowered immune threshold, adversely affected brain temperature, systemic hypotension, and dyskalemia. For these reasons, these drugs should be monitored carefully and only used in circumstances of clear benefit. Finally, in order to evaluate barbiturates use during these procedures, information was gathered via an extensive PubMed literature review in addition to reviewing the resources of previous reviews on this topic or similar, relevant topics.

Background External ventricular drains (EVDs) measure intracranial pressure, divert cerebrospinal fluid, and allow for orthotropic administration of pharmacologic agents. Currently, neurosurgeons and neurosurgery residents are the primary practitioners placing EVDs. Due to the urgency of neurosurgical pathologies and the lack of qualified residents at most hospitals, midlevel practitioner (MLP) placement of EVDs would be advantageous. Objective To assess the accuracy and complication rates of MLP and neurosurgeon EVD placement. Methods This was a retrospective cohort of all patients with an EVD placed between January 2012 and September 2016 at a level 1 trauma center. We compared safety and accuracy of EVD placement between neurosurgeons and MLPs. Results MLP first attempted EVD placement in 238 patients and senior neurosurgeon first attempted EVD placement in 70 subjects. There was no significant difference between accuracy of placement within the ventricle (87.4% vs 90.0%, P = .5557), hemorrhage rate (5.9% vs 4.3%, P = .77), or infection rate (0.8% vs 1.4%, P = .5399) for placement attempted by an MLP compared with a neurosurgeon, respectively. Conclusion MLPs perform EVD placement safely with no significant difference in accuracy of placement or complication rates compared with placement by senior neurosurgeons. This may allow for earlier management of elevated intracranial pressure and access to care where previously unavailable; leading to improved patient outcomes.

Myoepithelial tumours are a rare form of salivary gland neoplasm and intracranial metastases have rarely been described. The authors present the case of a 61-year-old patient with a history of primary myoepithelial carcinoma of the right foot. Metastases were found in the third ventricle, left temporal lobe and right frontal lobe. The third ventricular and left temporal lobe tumours were resected in a two-stage operation. Pathology of the third ventricular lesion was most consistent with metastasis. MRI of the spine 2 weeks after his operation revealed an intradural mass with several lesions in the lumbar thecal space suggesting further metastases. The patient succumbed to his disease 2 months after his two-stage operation and 5 years after his initial diagnosis. This appears to be the first case in the literature of multiple primary myoepithelial carcinoma metastases to the brain. Further information is needed to provide diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations.