Search

BackgroundEarly evaluations of healthcare professional (HCP) COVID-19 risk occurred during insufficient personal protective equipment and disproportionate testing, contributing to perceptions of high patient-care related HCP risk. We evaluated HCP COVID-19 seropositivity after accounting for community factors and coworker outbreaks.MethodsPrior to universal masking, we conducted a single-center retrospective cohort plus cross-sectional study. All HCP (1) seen by Occupational Health for COVID-like symptoms (regardless of test result) or assigned to (2) dedicated COVID-19 units, (3) units with a COVID-19 HCP outbreak, or (4) control units from 01/01/2020 to 04/15/2020 were offered serologic testing by an FDA-authorized assay plus a research assay against 67 respiratory viruses, including 11 SARS-CoV-2 antigens. Multivariable models assessed the association of demographics, job role, comorbidities, care of a COVID-19 patient, and geocoded socioeconomic status with positive serology.ResultsOf 654 participants, 87 (13.3%) were seropositive; among these 60.8% (N = 52) had never cared for a COVID-19 patient. Being male (OR 1.79, CI 1.05–3.04,p = 0.03), working in a unit with a HCP-outbreak unit (OR 2.21, CI 1.28–3.81,p p = 0.05), and ethnically Latino (OR 2.10, CI 1.12–3.96,p = 0.02) were positively-associated with COVID-19 seropositivity, while working in dedicated COVID-19 units was negatively-associated (OR 0.53, CI = 0.30–0.94,p = 0.03). The research assay identified 25 additional seropositive individuals (78 [12%] vs. 53 [8%],p ConclusionsPrior to universal masking, HCP COVID-19 risk was dominated by workplace and community exposures while working in a dedicated COVID-19 unit was protective, suggesting that infection prevention protocols prevent patient-to-HCP transmission.Article summaryPrior to universal masking, HCP COVID-19 risk was dominated by workplace and community exposures while working in a dedicated COVID-19 unit was protective, suggesting that infection prevention protocols prevent patient-to-HCP transmission.

Background: Early evaluations of healthcare professional (HCP) COVID-19 risk occurred during insufficient personal protective equipment and disproportionate testing, contributing to perceptions of high patient-care related HCP risk. We evaluated HCP COVID-19 seropositivity after accounting for community factors and coworker outbreaks.Methods: Prior to universal masking, we conducted a single-center retrospective cohort plus cross-sectional study. All HCP 1) seen by Occupational Health for COVID-like symptoms (regardless of test result) or assigned to 2) dedicated COVID-19 units, 3) units with a COVID-19 HCP outbreak, or 4) control units from 01/01/2020-04/15/2020 were offered serologic testing by an FDA-authorized assay plus a research assay against 67 respiratory viruses, including 11 SARS-CoV-2 antigens. Multivariable models assessed the association of demographics, job role, comorbidities, care of a COVID-19 patient, and geocoded socioeconomic status with positive serology.Results: Of 654 participants, 87 (13.3%) were seropositive; among these 60.8% (N=52) had never cared for a COVID-19 patient. Being male (OR 1.79, CI 1.05-3.04, p=0.03), working in a HCP-outbreak unit (OR 2.21, CI 1.28-3.81, pConclusions: Prior to universal masking, HCP COVID-19 risk was dominated by workplace and community exposures while working in a dedicated COVID-19 unit was protective, suggesting that infection prevention protocols prevent patient-to-HCP transmission.

Author(s): Farzaneh, Ted; Wang, Beverly; Clark, Nancy; Eade-Viele, Carol; Kelner, Joyce; Rodgers, Jennifer; Sempa, Geoffrey; Detweiler, Neil; Kasmarek, Tara; Lee, Thomas; Zhao, Xiaohui; Monuki, Edwin S; Rezk, Sherif A | Abstract: BackgroundTraining in patient safety, quality, and management is a key component of Graduate Medical Education (GME) training in all specialties. However, residency programs, especially Pathology programs, often find it challenging to create strong learning opportunities in these areas.ObjectivesFocused quality assurance (QA) projects are one approach to teach and engage trainees in these key areas. Residents have been historically involved in different QA projects in our department but mainly in small secondary roles. Leading a large QA project that can enhance residents' management skills and improve clinical operations in our laboratory was the main objective of our project.DescriptionA new process for laboratory self-inspection led by residents was implemented that simulates the exact process of a formal outside College of American Pathologists (CAP) inspection. We aim to prove that resident-led QA activities not only have profound educational benefit but can also result in significant performance and operational improvement.ResultsFor this paper, we focus on the Histology laboratory since the ramifications from the self-inspection process during a three year period were profound leading to change in management, workflow changes, and notable improvement in staff morale.ConclusionThe self-inspection process exposed the residents to operational issues and corrective actions that provided them the opportunity to take a more active role in laboratory management and helped prepare them for post-graduation challenges. It also helped the department identify and rectify many operational issues, confirmed by the enumeration of CAP deficiencies and significant improvement of staff morale.