Search

Introduction: To describe recent evidence regarding the most effective neonatal resuscitation training program and scale-up of these programs in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), which has contributed to the upcoming Lancet Global Newborn Care Series 2025, and forms part of a supplement describing an extensive synthesis on effective newborn interventions in LMICs. Methods: We included relevant studies from Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL and Global Index Medicus databases on the effectiveness and scale-up of Neonatal Resuscitation Training Programs (NRTP), with searches run August 2022. Data extraction and quality assessments were completed independently and in duplicate. Results: A total of 93 unique records met the eligibility criteria and were included in our analyses across the reviews. NRTPs improved most knowledge and skill-based outcomes but impact on mortality varied. Included studies identified knowledge and skill retention, standardized training protocols, and limited training opportunities for health care providers as challenges to current NRTPs. Conclusion: Reported knowledge, skills, and mortality outcomes were similar across NRTPs. The Helping Babies Breathe (HBB) program was found to be cost-effective in Tanzania, suggesting that the HBB program or elements thereof are low-cost and scalable in LMICs. Future research across diverse settings should evaluate the cost-effectiveness of other NRTPs. To scale-up current NRTPs, programs should focus on improving long-term retention outcomes and improving training material accessibility. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Advanced neonatal resuscitation events are high-risk, low-volume critical situations. Healthcare systems have placed emphasis on improving resuscitation skills for advanced providers based on evidence showing that it can directly impact patient outcomes. Neonatal resuscitation program (NRP) renewal is only required every 2 years. This gap and low usage of skills can result in lack of competency and expertise leading to an increased risk of poor patient outcomes. Purpose: This project aimed to provide simulation education based on NRP curriculum for a large group of advanced providers at multiple level II, III, and IV neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) and to improve confidence and knowledge in advanced resuscitation. Methods: A high-fidelity mannequin was used to simulate a reproducible, critical scenario that spanned the entire NRP algorithm. NRP knowledge and the effectiveness of simulation on confidence and knowledge in neonatal resuscitation were measured. Results: The average knowledge score from the pretest to the posttest improved by 7%. Based on the simulation evaluation tool-modified (SET-M), debriefing was the most effective in improving confidence and knowledge. The neonatal nurse practitioners (NNPs) with the most years of clinical experience had the largest improvement in knowledge. Implications for Practice and Research: With the most experienced NNPs providing majority of coverage in the Level II NICUs, a correlation may be drawn that the effect of simulations on NRP knowledge has a greater impact on these groups due to the low exposure of advanced resuscitation events at these sites. Debriefing stood out as the most critical component of simulation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background To improve patient outcomes and provider team practice, the California Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative (CPQCC) created the Simulating Success quality improvement program to assist hospitals in implementing a neonatal resuscitation training curriculum. This study aimed to examine the costs associated with the design and implementation of the Simulating Success program. Methods From 2017–2020, a total of 14 sites participated in the Simulating Success program and 4 of them systematically collected resource utilization data. Using a micro-costing approach, we examined costs for the design and implementation of the program occurring at CPQCC and the 4 study sites. Data collection forms were used to track personnel time, equipment/supplies, space use, and travel (including transportation, food, and lodging). Cost analysis was conducted from the healthcare sector perspective. Costs incurred by CPQCC were allocated to participant sites and then combined with site-specific costs to estimate the mean cost per site, along with its 95% confidence interval (CI). Cost estimates were inflation-adjusted to 2022 U.S. dollars. Results Designing and implementing the Simulating Success program cost $228,148.36 at CPQCC, with personnel cost accounting for the largest share (92.2%), followed by program-related travel (6.1%), equipment/supplies (1.5%), and space use (0.2%). Allocating these costs across participant sites and accounting for site-specific resource utilizations resulted in a mean cost of $39,210.69 per participant site (95% CI: $34,094.52-$44,326.86). In sensitivity analysis varying several study assumptions (e.g., number of participant sites, exclusion of design costs, and useful life span of manikins), the mean cost per site changed from $35,645.22 to $39,935.73. At all four sites, monthly cost of other neonatal resuscitation training was lower during the program implementation period (mean = $1,112.52 per site) than pre-implementation period (mean = $2,504.01 per site). In the 3 months after the Simulating Success program ended, monthly cost of neonatal resuscitation training was also lower than the pre-implementation period at two of the four sites. Conclusions Establishing a multi-site neonatal in situ simulation program requires investment of sufficient resources. However, such programs may have financial and non-financial benefits in the long run by offsetting the need for other neonatal resuscitation training and improving practice.

Background: To improve patient outcomes and provider team practice, the California Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative (CPQCC) created the Simulating Success quality improvement program to assist hospitals in implementing a neonatal resuscitation training curriculum. This study aimed to examine the costs associated with the design and implementation of the Simulating Success program. Methods: From 2017–2020, a total of 14 sites participated in the Simulating Success program and 4 of them systematically collected resource utilization data. Using a micro-costing approach, we examined costs for the design and implementation of the program occurring at CPQCC and the 4 study sites. Data collection forms were used to track personnel time, equipment/supplies, space use, and travel (including transportation, food, and lodging). Cost analysis was conducted from the healthcare sector perspective. Costs incurred by CPQCC were allocated to participant sites and then combined with site-specific costs to estimate the mean cost per site, along with its 95% confidence interval (CI). Cost estimates were inflation-adjusted to 2022 U.S. dollars. Results: Designing and implementing the Simulating Success program cost $228,148.36 at CPQCC, with personnel cost accounting for the largest share (92.2%), followed by program-related travel (6.1%), equipment/supplies (1.5%), and space use (0.2%). Allocating these costs across participant sites and accounting for site-specific resource utilizations resulted in a mean cost of $39,210.69 per participant site (95% CI: $34,094.52-$44,326.86). In sensitivity analysis varying several study assumptions (e.g., number of participant sites, exclusion of design costs, and useful life span of manikins), the mean cost per site changed from $35,645.22 to $39,935.73. At all four sites, monthly cost of other neonatal resuscitation training was lower during the program implementation period (mean = $1,112.52 per site) than pre-implementation period (mean = $2,504.01 per site). In the 3 months after the Simulating Success program ended, monthly cost of neonatal resuscitation training was also lower than the pre-implementation period at two of the four sites. Conclusions: Establishing a multi-site neonatal in situ simulation program requires investment of sufficient resources. However, such programs may have financial and non-financial benefits in the long run by offsetting the need for other neonatal resuscitation training and improving practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To describe the timing of major resuscitation events in the Delivery room. Methods: A retrospective study of neonates born at a level III birthing hospital who received chest compressions in the delivery room was conducted. The timing of the resuscitation events i.e., intubation, UVC, endotracheal (ETT), epinephrine and intravenous (IV) epinephrine were described. The timing of these events were compared for deliveries with the presence of neonatology team. Results: 51 neonates were included. An alternate airway was secured at 4.24 ± 5.9 minutes. Endotracheal epinephrine and IV epinephrine were administered at a mean time of 3.98 ± 3 minutes and 10.87± 5.18 minutes after the initiation of chest compressions respectively. Conclusion: Data from real-life cases on the timeline of events suggest that major resuscitation events as suggested by Neonatal Resuscitation Program Guidelines, are often significantly delayed.

The Textbook of Neonatal Resuscitation, seventh edition, does not suggest routine endotracheal suctioning for non-vigorous infants born through meconium-stained amniotic fluid. We compared 301,150 infants at ≥35 weeks' gestational age inborn at 311 Vermont Oxford Network member centers in the United States (U.S.) and admitted to neonatal intensive care units (NICU) who were born before (2013 to 2015) and after (2017) the guideline change. Logistic regression models adjusting for clustering of infants within centers were used to calculate risk ratios. NICU admissions for infants with a diagnosis of meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS) decreased from 1.8% to 1.5% (risk ratio: 0.82; 95% confidence interval: 0.68, 0.97) and delivery room endotracheal suctioning in this group decreased from 57.0% to 28.9% (0.51; 0.41, 0.62). Treatment with conventional or high frequency ventilation, inhaled nitric oxide, or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation remained unchanged 42.3% vs. 40.3% (0.95; 0.80, 1.13) among infants with MAS and 9.1% vs. 8.2% (0.91; 0.87, 0.95) among infants without MAS. The use of surfactant among infants with MAS increased from 24.6% to 30% (1.22; 1.02, 1.48). Mortality (2.6 to 2.9%, 1.12; 0.74, 1.69) and moderate/severe hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (5.4 to 6.8%, 1.24; 0.91, 1.69) increased slightly in 2017. Subgroup analyses of infants with 1 min Apgar scores of ≤3 found similar results. While NICU admissions for MAS and tracheal suctioning decreased after the introduction of the new guideline with no subsequent increase in severe respiratory distress among infants with and without a MAS diagnosis, limitations in our study preclude inferring that the new guideline is safe or effective.

Background: Since 2005, the Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) has recommended the laryngeal mask (LM) as an alternative airway when positive-pressure ventilation (PPV) is unsuccessful and intubation is unsuccessful or unfeasible. There is a paucity of literature regarding LM use in high-resource countries; however, anecdotal information and recent studies suggest low implementation.Purpose: This article increases awareness of LM safety and efficacy, provides guidance for determining nursing scope of practice, and includes suggestions for developing a training program.Methods: Methods include considering NRP customers' questions, recent systematic reviews of the literature, how NRP recommendations are developed, how to determine nursing scope of practice, and how to develop a training program.Findings/results: Recent studies support the NRP recommendation to use the LM as a rescue airway when PPV fails and intubation is not feasible. The LM provides more effective PPV than face-mask ventilation. The LM may be effective as the initial PPV device for infants of at least 34 weeks' gestation. To use the LM, nurses may require training, which may include a simulation-based curriculum.Implications For Practice: Nurses can increase their awareness of the advantages of LM use, determine their scope of practice, and develop a training program. When face-mask ventilation is unsuccessful and intubation is unfeasible, LM insertion will likely increase the newborn's heart rate and avoid intubation.Implications For Research: Future research should determine training requirements, efficacy of the LM as the initial PPV device in high-resource settings, and LM use during complex resuscitation and in preterm newborns. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation is a critical component of neonatal care. While the basic principles of resuscitation are consistent across different settings, the specific challenges and resources available in the delivery room and the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) vary significantly. Understanding the differences between these settings is essential for optimizing resuscitation outcomes. This article explores four key areas of difference—environment and equipment, team composition and roles, care protocols and practices, and patient population and condition—and how they impact neonatal resuscitation efforts. By examining these differences, healthcare neonatal care teams can better prepare for the specific resuscitation needs in each setting, ultimately improving neonatal survival and long-term health outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Infant death is most prominent in the neonatal period. The success of neonatal resuscitation practice has many contributing factors. One of which is the health workers’ knowledge of the Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) algorithm. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct studies to evaluate the health workers’ knowledge of the Neonatal Resuscitation Program who are educated in neonatal resuscitation course and has taken part in Neonatal Life Support practice in primary health care (PHC) Objective: This study aims to analyze the knowledge of general practitioners and midwives who has or has not attended in neonatal resuscitation course in Surabaya PHC Methods and Materials: this research is descriptive, cross-sectional research. All Basic Emergency Obstetric and Newborn Care (BEmONC) PHC in Surabaya which are Jagir PHC, Banyu Urip PHC, Medokan Ayu PHC, Tanah kali Kedinding PHC, Tanjungsari PHC, Balongsari PHC, Sememi PHC, Simomulyo PHC is included in this research from 2018 to 2019. A nine-item questionnaire referenced from The Textbook of Neonatal Resuscitation 7th Edition is given to ten respondents in each BEmONC PHC. Results and Discussion: from the total sample of 78 respondents, 32 (41,0%) receive a high score, 20 (25,7%) receive a middle score, and 26 (33,3%) receive a low score. The data shows that there is no significant score difference between respondents who has or has not participate in the NRP course (p=0,419). Conclusion: There is no correlation between difference knowledge midwives and general practitioners who had and had not attended neonatal resuscitation training at basic emergency obstetric and newborn care in public health center Surabaya.

Aim: Neonatal cardiopulmonary arrests are rare but serious events. There is limited information on compliance to best-practice guidelines due to rarity, but deviations can have dire consequences. This research aimed to characterize compliance with and deviations from Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) guidelines and their association with teamwork. Methods: We observed Emergency Medical Service (EMS) teams responding to standardized neonatal resuscitation simulations following a precipitous home delivery. A Clinical expert evaluated teamwork during simulations using the Clinical Teamwork Scale (CTS™). A neonatologist evaluated technical performance in blinded video review according to NRP guidelines. We report the types, counts, and severity of observed deviations. Logistic regression tested the association of CTS™ factors with the occurrence of deviations. Results: Forty-five (45) teams of 265 EMS personnel from fire and transport agencies participated in the simulations. Eighty-seven percent (39/45) of teams were rated as having good teamwork according to CTS™. Nearly all teams (44 of 45) delayed or did not perform one or more of the initial steps of dry, warm, or stimulate; delayed bag-valve mask ventilation (BVM); or performed continuous compressions instead of the recommended 3:1 compression-to-ventilation ratio. Logistic regression revealed an 82% (p

Background: Use of simulation-based learning methodologies enhance performance in both simulated resuscitations and real-life clinical situations. Retention of skill is very important for the MBBS doctors who hardly get any exposure to such learning before entering post-graduate courses. The major cause of early neonatal death is neonatal asphyxia, which can be prevented by neonatal resuscitation. Effective resuscitation at birth can prevent neonatal deaths to a greater extent. Training in cardio-pulmonary resuscitation is critical in determining successful outcomes in perinatal asphyxia. Hence the present study was done to check the retention of knowledge after Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP ) training. Methods: A prospective interventional study was carried out among the MBBS interns who started their internship program from March 2020 - February 2021 in ACSR Government Medical College, Nellore. All the Interns were given training in NRP as a part of internship orientation programme during the first week of internship. Out of 150 interns, 143 participated in the study. The interns were oriented to the study and a pretest questionnaire was administered to them to assess their knowledge and skill regarding NRP which was followed by NRP training by the faculty of pediatrics and neonatology. The same questionnaire was administered immediately at the end of the training, 1 and 6 months post NRP training for assessing their knowledge and skill. Results: As compared to pre intervention score, the mean scores of the immediate post intervention score and at 1 month after intervention the mean score was increased with respect to knowledge and skills. After 6 months the mean scores pertaining to knowledge and skill decreased which were statistically significant. Conclusions: A significant decrease in the level of knowledge and skills regarding neonatal resuscitation was observed. Therefore, maintaining resuscitation skill requires continuous practice, supplemented by simulation training as needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To determine whether hospital mortality (primary outcome) is associated with duration of bradycardia without chest compressions during delivery room (DR) resuscitation in a retrospective cohort study of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in preterm infants assigned low versus high initial oxygen concentration.Methods: Medline and EMBASE were searched from 01/01/1990 to 12/01/2020. RCTs of low vs high initial oxygen concentration which recorded serial heart rate (HR) and oxygen saturation (SpO2) during resuscitation of infants <32 weeks gestational age were eligible. Individual patient level data were requested from the authors. Newborns receiving chest compressions in the DR and those with no recorded HR in the first 2 min after birth were excluded. Prolonged bradycardia (PB) was defined as HR < 100 bpm for ≥2 min. Individual patient data analysis and pooled data analysis were conducted.Results: Data were collected from 720 infants in 8 RCTs. Neonates with PB had higher odds of hospital death before [OR 3.8 (95% CI 1.5, 9.3)] and after [OR 1.7 (1.2, 2.5)] adjusting for potential confounders. Bradycardia occurred in 58% infants, while 38% had PB. Infants with bradycardia were more premature and had lower birth weights. The incidence of bradycardia in infants resuscitated with low (≤30%) and high (≥60%) oxygen was similar. Neonates with both, PB and SpO2 < 80% at 5 min after birth had higher odds of hospital mortality. [OR 18.6 (4.3, 79.7)].Conclusion: In preterm infants who did not receive chest compressions in the DR, prolonged bradycardia is associated with hospital mortality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective  Task-oriented role assignment (TORA) is the assignment of a specific role, a list of tasks, and a location to stand to each resuscitation team member. We performed this study to examine the impact of TORA training during a Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) course on neonatal resuscitation team technical performance and behavioral skills. Study Design  Participants were cluster randomized into either a standard NRP course (control) or an NRP course with TORA training. Both technical and behavioral skills were evaluated using standardized simulations. The simulations were video recorded and then scored by two blinded reviewers using previously validated instruments. Results  A total of 65 participants (62 resident physicians and 3 nurses) participated in 108 simulations (48 controls, 60 TORA). Technical skill scores were similar between the two groups (control = 77.6% [±8.4] vs. TORA = 78.1% [±8.1]; p  = 0.74). The TORA group had higher behavior skill scores in 8 of the 10 NRP key behavioral skills and had higher overall behavioral skill scores (control = 30.1 [±7.2] vs. TORA = 34.9 [±4.8]; p  < 0.001). Conclusion  In resuscitation teams comprising mostly resident physicians, TORA training resulted in better behavioral skills during simulated neonatal resuscitation. Further study on the impact of TORA training on actual resuscitation performance in interdisciplinary teams is warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Approximately 10% of newborns need assistance at birth, and an evidence-based, timely, and coordinated response is critical to optimal outcome. The Neonatal Resuscitation Program® (NRP®) is the training and education standard in the United States for healthcare professionals who manage newborns in the hospital. This article summarizes the development of evidence-based resuscitation science, changes in the NRP 8th edition educational methodologies, and several significant practice changes made for educational efficiency and patient safety.Evidence Acquisition: The NRP 8th edition is informed by multiple systematic reviews of emerging science conducted by the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR), which culminates in consensus documents on resuscitation science. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and the American Heart Association (AHA) used these recommendations to develop the most recent neonatal resuscitation guidelines for North America. These guidelines inform the NRP 8th edition practice recommendations.Results: The most recent CoSTR (Consensus on Science with Treatment Recommendations) summary and AAP/AHA guidelines for neonatal resuscitation yielded no major changes in practice. However, scientific research over the past 5 years resulted in new and higher grades of evidence to support previous recommendations. The NRP Steering Committee revised several practices in the interest of patient safety and educational efficiency.Implications For Practice: The NRP 8th edition materials were released in June 2021 and must be in use by January 1, 2022. In the new ILCOR evidence review format, CoSTR scientific reviews and statements are published continuously instead of every 5 years; however, future editions of NRP will be released every 5 years unless there is compelling evidence that mandates an earlier change. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To examine whether audio-voice guidance application improves adherence to resuscitation sequence and recommended time frames during neonatal resuscitation. A prospective, randomized, pilot study examining the use of an audio-voice application for guiding resuscitation on newborn mannequins, based on the Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) algorithm. Two different scenarios, with and without voice guidance, were presented to 20 medical personnel (2 midwives, 8 nurses, and 10 physicians) in random order, and their performance videotaped. Audio-voice guided resuscitation compared with non-guided resuscitation, resulted in significantly better compliance with NRP order sequence (p<0.01), correct use of oxygen supplementation (p<0.01) and performance of MR SOPA (Mask, reposition, suction, open mouth, pressure, airway) (p<0.01), and shortened the time to "positive pressure ventilation" (p<0.01). In this pilot study, audio-voice guidance application for newborn resuscitation simulation on mannequins, based on the NRP algorithm, improved adherence and performance of NRP guidelines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) was created by the American Academy of Pediatrics to provide education for pediatric post-graduate trainees in the initial management of newborns that require transfer to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Studies have shown that clinical performance and theoretical knowledge retention begins to significantly decline soon after this course is completed, in as little as six months. It has been suggested that providing NRP courses as often as every six months may improve retention of NRP knowledge and skill. We conducted a survey study of resident trainees to assess the impact of a booster educational class at six months following the initial class. Due to low survey response rate our data is limited; however, we found a clear trend i n increased resident comfort levels following a booster class. The specific scenarios included in the training were: 39-week vaginal delivery with meconium stained amniotic fluid, 28-week premature cesarean delivery for maternal pre-eclampsia, neonatal intubation, and umbilical venous and arterial catheterization. We suggest that an NRP booster class adds value to resident comfort in performing neonatal resuscitations and procedures and that its effectiveness should be studied on a larger sample. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Periviable infants (PIs) born at 22-25 weeks gestational age (wGA) have a variable survival rate (49.7-86.2%) among hospitals. One factor involved in this difference may be the definition of the threshold of viability. The American Academy of Pediatrics revised the neonatal resuscitation program in late 2015 (NRP 2015) and altered the threshold of viability from 23 to 22 wGA. The impact on the survival of PIs after the guideline alteration has seldom been discussed. Since 2016, the unit of this study has implemented the renewed guideline for PIs. We retrospectively reviewed and analyzed the survival and clinical variables of PIs before and after implementation of the guideline, which included a 10-year cohort in a single center in Taiwan. There were 168 PIs enrolled between 2010 and 2019 (Epoch-I, 2010-2015; Epoch-II, 2016-2019), after excluding those with congenital anomalies and parent-decided comfort care. Compared to those in Epoch-I, the PIs in Epoch-II had significantly higher odds ratios (2.602) (95% confidence interval: 1.170-5.789; p = 0.019) for survival. Younger gestational age, small size for gestational age, cesarean delivery, low blood pH at birth, and surfactant therapeutic treatment were found to be significant risk factors associated with the survival of PIs (p < 0.05 for each). The altered threshold of viability by NRP 2015 may impact the survival of PIs. However, long-term follow-up for surviving PI is required in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Taylor Sawyer, Rachel A Umoren, Megan M Gray Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Neonatal Education and Simulation-based Training (NEST) Program, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA Abstract: Each year in the US, some four hundred thousand newborns need help breathing when they are born. Due to the frequent need for resuscitation at birth, it is vital to have evidence-based care guidelines and to provide effective neonatal resuscitation training. Every five years, the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) reviews the science of neonatal resuscitation. In the US, the American Heart Association (AHA) develops treatment guidelines based on the ILCOR science review, and the Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) translates the AHA guidelines into an educational curriculum. In this report, we review recent advances in neonatal resuscitation training and practice. We begin with a review of the new 7th edition NRP training curriculum. Then, we examine key changes to the 2015 AHA neonatal resuscitation guidelines. The four components of the NRP curriculum reviewed here include eSim®, Performance Skills Stations, Integrated Skills Station, and Simulation and Debriefing. The key changes to the AHA neonatal resuscitation guidelines reviewed include initial steps of newborn care, positive-pressure ventilation, endotracheal intubation and use of laryngeal mask, chest compressions, medications, resuscitation of preterm newborns, and ethics and end-of-life care. We hope this report provides a succinct review of recent advances in neonatal resuscitation. Keywords: neonatal resuscitation, Neonatal Resuscitation Program, NRP, simulation, deliberate practice, debriefing, eSIM

Periviable infants (PIs) born at 22–25 weeks gestational age (wGA) have a variable survival rate (49.7–86.2%) among hospitals. One factor involved in this difference may be the definition of the threshold of viability. The American Academy of Pediatrics revised the neonatal resuscitation program in late 2015 (NRP 2015) and altered the threshold of viability from 23 to 22 wGA. The impact on the survival of PIs after the guideline alteration has seldom been discussed. Since 2016, the unit of this study has implemented the renewed guideline for PIs. We retrospectively reviewed and analyzed the survival and clinical variables of PIs before and after implementation of the guideline, which included a 10-year cohort in a single center in Taiwan. There were 168 PIs enrolled between 2010 and 2019 (Epoch-I, 2010–2015; Epoch-II, 2016–2019), after excluding those with congenital anomalies and parent-decided comfort care. Compared to those in Epoch-I, the PIs in Epoch-II had significantly higher odds ratios (2.602) (95% confidence interval: 1.170–5.789; p = 0.019) for survival. Younger gestational age, small size for gestational age, cesarean delivery, low blood pH at birth, and surfactant therapeutic treatment were found to be significant risk factors associated with the survival of PIs (p < 0.05 for each). The altered threshold of viability by NRP 2015 may impact the survival of PIs. However, long-term follow-up for surviving PI is required in the future.

This study examines for the first time the moderating role of growth mindset on the association between the time elapsed since participants' last refresher neonatal resuscitation program (NRP) course and their performance on neonatal resuscitation tasks in the RETAIN computer game training simulation. Participants were n = 50 health-care providers affiliated with a large university hospital. Results revealed that growth mindset moderated the relation between participants' task performance in the game and the time since their latest refresher NRP course. Specifically, participants who completed the course more recently (i.e., between 8 and 9 months before the current study) made significantly more mistakes in the game than the rest of the participants but only when they endorsed lower levels of growth mindset. Implications of this research include growth mindset interventions and increased screen time in simulation sessions that have the potential to help health-care providers achieve better performance on neonatal resuscitation clinical tasks.

Background: The most recent guidelines by the Neonatal Resuscitation Program recommend use of electrocardiography monitoring during advanced resuscitation. Objective: We describe a case in whom detection of pulseless electrical activity (PEA) on electronic heart rate monitoring complicated delivery room management of an extremely low birth weight infant and offer suggestions for the identification of PEA for neonatal providers. Conclusion: Further prospective studies are needed to determine the true incidence of PEA in the delivery room setting as well as its prognosis in newborns. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Following neonatal resuscitation program (NRP) training, decay in clinical skills can occur. Simulation-based deliberate practice (SBDP) has been shown to maintain NRP skills to a variable extent. Our study objectives were (a) to determine whether a single 30 min simulation-based intervention that incorporates SBDP and mastery learning (ML) can effectively restore skills and prevent skill decay and (b) to compare different timing options. Methods: Following NRP certification, pediatric residents were randomly assigned to receive a video-recorded baseline assessment plus SBDP-ML refresher education at between 6 and 9 months (early) or between 9 and 12 months (late). One year following initial certification, participants had repeat skill retention videotaped evaluations. Participants were scored by blinded NRP instructors using validated criteria scoring tools and assigned a global performance rating score (GRS). Results: Twenty-seven participants were included. Residents in both early and late groups showed significant skill decay 7 and 10 months after initial NRP. SBDP-ML booster sessions significantly improved participants' immediate NRP performance scores (p<0.001), which persisted for 2 months, but were again lower 4 months later. Conclusions: NRP skills may be boosted to mastery levels after a short SBDP-ML intervention and do not appear to significantly decline after 2 months. Brief booster training could potentially serve as a useful supplement to traditional NRP training for pediatric residents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract The management of conjoined twins is complex and requires careful preparation. Pre-birth management includes prenatal counseling, which is important due to the overall poor prognosis. In instances of trial of life, the delivery must be tailored to address the anticipated anatomy based on prenatal imaging and anticipated physiology. A multidisciplinary team is essential to anticipate and address the ergonomic challenges and medical issues related to organ fusion, cross-circulation and associated anomalies. There are several suggested modifications to the current Neonatal Resuscitation Program algorithm including modifications to initial assessment, airway management, administration of chest compressions, obtaining emergency access, and medication dosing. Simulation is essential to address challenges, practice Neonatal Resuscitation Program modifications, delineate clear roles during delivery and practice communication. This paper offers a discussion of unique issues associated with delivery of conjoined twins and recommendations on how to approach these challenges based on our experience and available literature. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Textbook of Neonatal Resuscitation, seventh edition, does not suggest routine endotracheal suctioning for non-vigorous infants born through meconium-stained amniotic fluid. We compared 301,150 infants at ≥35 weeks’ gestational age inborn at 311 Vermont Oxford Network member centers in the United States (U.S.) and admitted to neonatal intensive care units (NICU) who were born before (2013 to 2015) and after (2017) the guideline change. Logistic regression models adjusting for clustering of infants within centers were used to calculate risk ratios. NICU admissions for infants with a diagnosis of meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS) decreased from 1.8% to 1.5% (risk ratio: 0.82; 95% confidence interval: 0.68, 0.97) and delivery room endotracheal suctioning in this group decreased from 57.0% to 28.9% (0.51; 0.41, 0.62). Treatment with conventional or high frequency ventilation, inhaled nitric oxide, or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation remained unchanged 42.3% vs. 40.3% (0.95; 0.80, 1.13) among infants with MAS and 9.1% vs. 8.2% (0.91; 0.87, 0.95) among infants without MAS. The use of surfactant among infants with MAS increased from 24.6% to 30% (1.22; 1.02, 1.48). Mortality (2.6 to 2.9%, 1.12; 0.74, 1.69) and moderate/severe hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (5.4 to 6.8%, 1.24; 0.91, 1.69) increased slightly in 2017. Subgroup analyses of infants with 1 min Apgar scores of ≤3 found similar results. While NICU admissions for MAS and tracheal suctioning decreased after the introduction of the new guideline with no subsequent increase in severe respiratory distress among infants with and without a MAS diagnosis, limitations in our study preclude inferring that the new guideline is safe or effective.

Background: Structured training courses have shown to improve patient outcomes; however, guidelines are inconsistently applied in up to 50% of all neonatal resuscitations. This is partly due to the fact that psychomotor skills needed for resuscitation decay within 6 months to a year from the completion of a certification course. Currently, there are no recommendations on how often refresher training should occur to prevent skill decay.Purpose: Improve provider proficiency and confidence in the performance of neonatal resuscitation with a focus on chest compression effectiveness.Methods: The study recruited neonatal intensive care unit providers (n = 25). A simulation-based Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) curriculum was developed and executed. Training sessions were delivered utilizing in situ simulations at varying time intervals. Pre- and postconfidence surveys and practicum skill scores were collected and evaluated by a content expert. Categorical data were summarized by frequency and percentage and tested for distributional equality via Pearson chi-square tests or Fisher exact tests depending on cell sample size distribution. All statistical tests were 2-sided with P < .05 considered statistically significant.Results: Provider overall confidence and rate of chest compressions improved; however, there was no statistically significant difference between groups. Rolling refresher training at varied time intervals did not demonstrate statistically significant differences in chest compression quality among NRP providers.Implications For Practice: Rolling refresher training more frequently than every 6 months may not provide added benefit to NRP providers.Implications For Research: Additional research is needed to determine optimal refresher training frequency to prevent skill decay. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: The use of simulation-based team training in neonatal resuscitation has increased in Sweden during the last decade, but no formal evaluation of this training method has been performed. This study evaluated the effect of simulation-based team training on the self-assessed ability of personnel to perform neonatal resuscitation.Methods: We evaluated a full-day simulation-based team training course in neonatal resuscitation, by administering a questionnaire to 110 physicians, nurses and midwives before and after the training period. The questionnaire focused on four important domains: communication, leadership, confidence and technical skills. The study was carried out in Sweden from 2005 to 2007.Results: The response rate was 84%. Improvements in the participants' self-assessed ability to perform neonatal resuscitation were seen in all four domains after training (p < 0.001). Professionally inexperienced personnel showed a significant improvement in the technical skills domain compared to experienced personnel (p = 0.001). No differences were seen between professions or time since training in any of the four domains. Personnel with less previous experience with neonatal resuscitation showed improved confidence (p = 0.007) and technical skills (p = 0.003).Conclusion: A full-day course on simulation-based team training with video-supported debriefing improved the participants' self-assessed ability to perform neonatal resuscitation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The Neonatal Resuscitation Program's (NRP's) Sixth Edition introduced simulation-based training (SBT) into neonatal life support training. SBT offers neonatal emergency response teams a safe, secure environment to rehearse coordinated neonatal resuscitations. Teamwork and communication training can reduce tension and anxiety during neonatal medical emergencies. Purpose: To discuss the implications of variability in number and type of simulation scenario, number and type of learners who comprise a course, and their influence upon scope of practice, role confusion, and role ambiguity. Methods: Relevant articles from MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Google Scholar, the World Health Organization, the American Heart Association, and NRP were included in this integrative review of the literature. Findings/results: Purposeful synergy of optimal SBT course construct with teamwork and communication can resist discipline compartmentalization, role confusion, and role ambiguity. Five key themes were identified and coined the "5 Rights" of NRP SBT. These "5 Rights" can guide healthcare institutions with planning, implementation, and evaluation of NRP SBT courses. Implications For Practice: NRP SBT can facilitate optimal team function and reduce errors when teams of learners and varied scenarios are woven into the course construct. The simulated environment must be realistic and fully equipped to encourage knowledge transfer and attainment of the NRP's key behavioral outcomes. Implications For Research: Investigation of teamwork and communication training with NRP SBT, course construct, discipline compartmentalization, and behavioral and clinical outcomes is indicated. Investigation of outcomes of SBT using a team-teaching model, combining basic and advanced practice NRP instructors, is indicated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]