Search

Study Design: Retrospective review of data., Objective: To determine if there is a relationship between the Asia Impairment Scale (AIS) and the bladder and bowel components of the International Standards to Document Remaining Autonomic Function after SCI (ISAFSCI)., Setting: University-Based Academic Rehabilitation Program., Methods: Retrospective cross-sectional study assessing International Standards for Neurologic Classification After SCI (ISNCSCI) examination along with bladder and bowel components of the ISAFSCI., Results: Subjects with AIS A injuries were statistically less likely to have history of bladder control and bowel control per investigator determination and bladder sensation via self-report versus patients categorized with AIS B injuries. Self-reported history of bowel sensation and control of voiding were more likely in subjects with C, D, or E injuries than with B injuries. Bowel and bladder control as determined by investigator and bladder and bowel sensation and control as self-reported were all statistically less likely in persons with AIS A injuries versus CDE., Conclusions: This retrospective study provides initial data regarding components of the bladder and bowel sections of the sacral ISAFSCI and AIS. Further prospective research is needed to further characterize the relationship between retention of bladder and bowel sensation and function and the AIS. We suggest that incorporation of the sacral components of the ISAFSCI into the ISNCSCI may be beneficial to obtain further information about retention of sacral function with specific patterns of injury., Competing Interests: Conflict of interestThe authors declare that they have no conflict of interest., (© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to International Spinal Cord Society 2019.)

Epidemiological studies that investigate the occurrence and determinants of chronic length-dependent polyneuropathy are scarce. Population-based studies on polyneuropathy require a valid and reliable screening protocol with both good sensitivity and specificity. Several questionnaires and scoring scales have been developed for the detection of polyneuropathy, grading the severity of the disease, or evaluating the clinical course during follow-up. This review summarizes the aims and content of existing diagnostic polyneuropathy screening tools in order to help future studies decide which scale to use for screening in specific situations. We searched the PubMed database and identified 27 scales, 13 are based on symptoms alone, 8 on neurological signs alone, and 6 on a combination of symptoms and signs. Scales that combine questions concerning symptoms and a neurological examination with a focus on sensory alterations seem to have the best discriminatory power. However, all scoring scales were developed for and investigated in prespecified patient populations. Therefore, the generalizability of specific findings to the general population may be limited. We also discuss other limitations of existing scales. Future studies are required to determine which clinimetrically well-developed scales are preferred for use in population-based studies., (© 2016 Peripheral Nerve Society.)

The use of rodent stroke models allow for the understanding of stroke pathophysiology. There is currently no gold standard neurological assessment to measure deficits and recovery from stroke in rodent models. Agreement on a universal preclinical stroke scale allows for comparison of the outcomes among conducted studies. The present study aimed to compare three routinely used neurological assessments in rodent studies (i.e., Garcia, Modo, and Longa) to determine which is most effective for accurately and consistently quantifying neurological deficits in the context of focal middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAo) in rats. Focal MCAo was induced in 22 male Wistar rats using a novel transfemoral approach. Rodents were assessed for neurological deficit pre-injury as well as 3 and 24h post-injury. Data was analyzed to determine Pearson correlation coefficients in addition to McNemar's χ(2) values between each pair of neurological assessments. All three stroke scales, Garcia, Modo, and Longa, showed statistically significant changes between the baseline and the 3-hour neurological assessments. A trend towards neurological recovery was observed in all three stroke scales between the 3 and 24-hour endpoints. The three scales were highly correlated with each other, with Garcia and Modo having the strongest correlation. Of the three pairwise analyses, the comparison between the Garcia and Longa tests demonstrated the highest McNemar's χ(2) value, indicating least marginal homogeneity between these two tests. The combination of high correlation between Garcia and Modo tests along with greatest marginal heterogeneity observed between the Garcia and Longa test lead us to recommend the use of Garcia and Longa neurological scales when researchers are hoping to capture the broadest range of neurological factors using only two stroke scales., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The stability of the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) over time is described in 77 infants (41 boys, 36 girls) with cerebral palsy (CP; mean age 19.4mo [SD 1.6 mo]; 27 unilateral spastic, 42 bilateral spastic, eight dyskinetic type) and in the same children at follow-up at age 2 to 4 years. The overall level of agreement over time (linear weighted kappa) was 0.70 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.61-0.79). The overall percentage of children whose GMFCS level changed one or two levels was 42%, of which the majority were reclassified to a less functional level (McNemar's Chi(2) test p=0.11). The chance that children initially classified in the combination of GMFCS Levels I, II, and III would subsequently be classified in the same level in early childhood was 96% (positive predictive value [PPV] 0.96, 95% CI 0.85-0.99), whereas the PPV for the combination of Levels I and II was 0.88, 95% CI 0.70-0.96. These findings indicate that GMFCS classification in infants is less precise than classification over time in older children. In conclusion, children can be classified by the GMFCS early on, but there is a need for reclassification at age 2 or older as more clinical information becomes available.

The T-wave of the patellar tendon reflex (PTR) was recorded in 24 neurologically normal dogs. The surface electromyogram (EMG) was recorded as the T-wave from the vastus lateralis muscle (VL) in response to percussion of the patellar tendon. The distance of the reflex arc (DRA) was measured along the straight line between the spinous process of L5 and the greater trochanter (GT), and between GT and the patellar ligament (PL). There was a significant correlation (P<0.001) of the latency with the DRA on each side, but no difference in the slopes of the relationships between right and left VL was shown. The regression line between the DRA and the latency of all data was Y = 0.0216X + 1.693, where Y = latency in ms, X = DRA in mm. The mixed sensory-motor conduction velocity was estimated as 84.6 +/- 5.5 m/s. In contrast, there was no significant correlation between the DRA and the amplitude of the T-waves. The mean (mean-CV) and standard deviation (SD-CV) of all CV (coefficient of variation) in each dog were 9.14 +/- 3.65% in latency and 3.54 +/- 1.14% in amplitude, indicating that the use of a simple hand-held reflex hammer is sufficient to record the reproducible T-wave of the PTR even in unanesthetized dogs. This method was applied to a case with minimal paraparesis, and the latency of the T-wave of the PTR in the right hind limb with slight proprioceptive deficit was outside of the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval between latency and the DRA. In conclusion, this method may be used in neurological diagnosis to quantify more precisely the PTR in dogs.

Objective: To develop an objective and uniform means for classifying patients with incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI) according to SCI syndromes., Design: Criteria for assigning the syndromes (defined by the International Standards for Neurological and Functional Classification of SCI Patients) were operationalized by means of sensory and motor scores and were incorporated into a set of six independent algorithms and two composite algorithms., Setting: A regional SCI rehabilitation center in Canada., Patients: SCI patients (n = 56) with incomplete injuries (American Spinal Injury Association classes B, C, D) and stable neurologic deficits., Results: Individual algorithms allowed the highest classification rate but with some patients meeting the criteria for more than one syndrome. A composite, differential allocation algorithm, with selected thresholds at decision nodes, yielded a classification rate approximating that of the individual algorithms but without double classifications., Conclusions: The composite algorithm provided an objective and standardized means of assigning patients to syndromes based on clinically measurable sensory and motor scores. The thresholds used to implement criteria and the order of decision nodes greatly influenced the outcomes and may be adjusted to suit the needs of the classification, that is, embracing liberal or stringent criteria. Controversy remains about the interpretation of some syndromes, and many patients remain unclassifiable because of mixed clinical presentation.

In 73 patients with myelomeningocele (mean 17.2 years, range 5 to 40 years) the classification of level of lesion was studied according to six commonly used classification systems and to the ambulation groups of Hoffer. The distribution of the patients into classes of thoracic-level lesions was the same for four classification systems in 10 patients and for two classification systems into categories of level L3 in 14 patients. For the other patients discrepancies occurred between systems for lesions of level L3 and downward. None of the patients was consistently categorized in the functional ambulation groups of Hoffer using all classification systems. The results show that it is not possible to compare neurological lesion levels classified according to the different systems described in this study and consequently that the distribution into the functional ambulation groups of Hoffer varies. To enhance communication and facilitate comparing the results of treatment we suggest using some basic criteria for patient documentation.

Objective: To review five sedation scoring systems and to determine their correlation with an objective method for assessing the level of sedation by means of auditory evoked potentials (AEP) in critically ill patients., Design: Prospective clinical study., Setting: Multidisciplinary intensive care unit in a university hospital., Patients: Ninety-five consecutive patients requiring sedation during intensive care therapy., Measurements and Results: Previous studies have shown that auditory evoked potentials, especially latencies of the midlatency component N(b), could serve as an indicator of depth of anaesthesia. In the present study we used this electrophysiological method to evaluate sedation during intensive care therapy. Changes in latency of peak N(b) were compared with various levels of sedation assessed by five established sedation scoring systems. As in anaesthesia, latencies of N(b) increased with increasing depth of sedation. Among the scoring systems, the one developed by Ramsay correlated best with changes in N(b) latency (r2=0.68). The coefficient of determination, r2, of the other scores ranged from 0.56 to 0.61., Conclusion: For the assessment of sedation, several scoring systems have been introduced into clinical practice, but the differentiation of deeper sedation levels, especially, remains poor. In this study we compared auditory evoked potentials, as an objective method with which to assess the level of sedation, with five different sedation scoring systems. In comparison with changes in latency of the midlatency component N(b), Ramsay's sedation score showed the closest correlation. Objective electrophysiological monitoring is desirable during long-term sedation.

This study used a modified Delphi technique to establish a list of core items which should be included in the measurement, by the physical therapist, of sensory-motor capacities of persons in a persistent vegetative state. Twenty-eight physical therapists with a mean of 5.9 years of experience working with this clientele participated in the study and identified 105 items as being important in the evaluation of the PVS patient (Round I). The study planning committee reduced these to 20 categories and asked the therapists to rate each category of items (a 5-point scale) as to it's importance (Round II). Physiotherapists identified 14 variables as being 'extremely' or 'very important' to include in such an evaluation. These included: tonus, voluntary movement on request, postural reactions, passive range of motion, tolerance to verticalization and postural status. These results are being used to develop a quantitative assessment instrument to be used by the physical therapist working with the PVS patient.

Our purpose was to verify some basic aspects of validation of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS). One hundred and sixty-seven Parkinson's disease (PD) patients were included. Group A (n = 40) was simultaneously assessed by five raters who applied the UPDRS and other PD rating scales (PDRS). A set of timed tests, the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and the Hamilton Scale for Depression (HSD) were administered by an independent examiner. Group B (n = 127) was individually assessed through the UPDRS and the other PDRSs by one neurologist in four different hospitals. The UPDRS was administered in 16.95 +/- 7.98 min. The internal consistency was high (Cronbach's alpha = 0.96). Nevertheless, the items related to depression, motivation/initiative, and tremor were scarcely consistent. The Interrater reliability was satisfactory (all the items had k > 0.40). There was a high correlation of the UPDRS with the Hoehn and Yahr staging (rs = 0.71; p < 0.001) and some timed tests (finger tapping; arising from chair), but also with the MMSE and HSD (rs = 0.53; rs = 0.64; p < 0.001). The convergent validity with the other PDRS (Intermediate Scale and Schwab and England Scale) was very high (rs = 0.76-0.96; p < 0.001). The factor analysis identified six factors that explained 59.6% of the variance. The dimension "tremor" showed a remarkable independence. The UPDRS is a multidimensional, reliable, and valid scale, with some inconveniences derived from its internal consistency, discriminant validity, and pragmatic application.

Interrater reliability of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) motor examination was assessed by three neurologists experienced in the administration of this scale. Intraclass correlation coefficients indicated good-to-excellent agreement for speeded repeated movements, resting tremor, arising from a chair, and gait; moderate agreement for action tremor, rigidity, posture, postural stability, and bradykinesia; and poor agreement for speech disorder and facial immobility. Overall, these results indicate that satisfactory interrater reliability is attainable with the UPDRS motor examination.

Although the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) is widely used to monitor disease progression and drug efficacy, no attempts have been made to evaluate its scientific and clinical quality. Poor clinical sensibility of items in the activities of daily living (ADL) section and redundancy of items in the motor examination (ME) section prompted us to determine if the number of items in these sections could be reduced to a smaller, equally sensitive set that would describe the data as reliably as did the original set of items. Therefore, we assessed 111 patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease on the UPDRS and Hoehn and Yahr staging scales. Our results show that the ADL (13 items) and ME (14 items) sections can be reduced to 8 items each without loss of reliability or validity. Our report is preliminary and needs validation.