Search

Posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) platform has shown low rates of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) after haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (HaploHCT). However, because of the limited disease control, relapse rate remains a major cause of treatment failure in high-risk patients. Total marrow and lymphoid irradiation (TMLI) allows for delivery of high radiation to bone marrow and other targeted structures, without increasing off-target radiation exposure and toxicity to end organs. In this phase 1 trial, 31 patients with high-risk and/or active primary refractory leukemias or myelodysplastic syndrome underwent peripheral blood stem cell HaploHCT with TMLI, fludarabine, and cyclophosphamide as the conditioning regimen. Radiation dose was escalated in increments of 200 cGy (1200-2000 cGy). GVHD prophylaxis was PTCy with tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil. Grade 2 toxicities by the Bearman scale were mucositis (n = 1), hepatic (n = 3), gastrointestinal (n = 5), and cardiac (n = 2). One patient (1800 cGy) experienced grade 3 pulmonary toxicity (dose-limiting toxicity). At a follow-up duration of 23.9 months for the whole cohort; 2-year NRM was 13%. Cumulative incidence of day 100 grade 2 to 4 and 3 to 4 acute GVHD was 52% and 6%, respectively. Chronic GVHD at 2 years was 35%. For patients treated with 2000 cGy, with a median follow-up duration of 12.3 months, 1-year relapse/progression, progression-free survival, and overall survival rates were 17%, 74%, and 83%, respectively. In conclusion, HaploHCT-TMLI with PTCy was safe and feasible in our high-risk patient population with promising outcomes.

BackgroundRelugolix is the newest form of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) approved for prostate cancer. However, as an oral drug, several real-world concerns exist, particularly medication compliance, safety with other androgen receptor-targeted agents, and financial burden to patients.MethodsA single institution retrospective chart review was conducted evaluating all patients who were prescribed relugolix for any prostate cancer indication from January 1, 2021 to January 31, 2022. Demographic data, cardiac risk factors, concomitant therapy usage, and PSA/testosterone levels, were abstracted from the chart review. Adverse effects were obtained by examining progress notes. Compliance was assessed by clinic notes as well as prescription fills by specialty pharmacy records. The reasons patients did not fill or discontinued the medication were noted.ResultsHundred and one patients were prescribed relugolix, and 91 patients consented to research. Seventy-one (78%) patients filled the prescription to relugolix, with a median follow-up of 5 months. Prescription fill data were available for 45 (63%) patients, with 94% of days covered. The most commonly reported reason not to fill was cost at 50%. Sixty-six (93%) patients reported never missing a dose. PSA levels were available in 71 (100%) patients with 69 (97%) showing stable or improved PSA. Testosterone levels were available in 61 (86%) of patients, which showed 61 (100%) stable or successful castration. Twenty-four (34%) patients used relugolix in combination. No new major safety signals were seen in combination therapy. Nineteen (27%) patients had switched to another form of ADT. Fifteen of these (79%) felt similar or better on relugolix therapy.ConclusionsCompliance with relugolix seemed acceptable. No major new safety signals were seen, even in combination. Among patients who switched therapy, most tolerated relugolix similarly or better than the previous form of ADT. The cost was a major reason for patients not initiating and for discontinuing therapy.

High-risk relapsed or refractory (R/R) classical Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is associated with poor outcomes after conventional salvage therapy and autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT). Post-AHCT consolidation with brentuximab vedotin (BV) improves progression-free survival (PFS), but with increasing use of BV early in the treatment course, the utility of consolidation is unclear. CD25 is often expressed on Reed-Sternberg cells and in the tumor microenvironment in HL, and we hypothesized that the addition of 90Y-antiCD25 (aTac) to carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan (BEAM) AHCT would be safe and result in a transplantation platform that is agnostic to prior HL-directed therapy. Twenty-five patients with high-risk R/R HL were enrolled in this phase 1 dose-escalation trial of aTac-BEAM. Following an imaging dose of 111In-antiCD25, 2 patients had altered biodistribution, and a third developed an unrelated catheter-associated bacteremia; therefore, 22 patients ultimately received therapeutic 90Y-aTac-BEAM AHCT. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed, and 0.6 mCi/kg was deemed the recommended phase 2 dose, the dose at which the heart wall would not receive >2500 cGy. Toxicities and time to engraftment were similar to those observed with standard AHCT, though 95% of patients developed stomatitis (all grade 1-2 per Bearman toxicity scale). Seven relapses (32%) were observed, most commonly in patients with ≥3 risk factors. The estimated 5-year PFS and overall survival probabilities among 22 evaluable patients were 68% and 95%, respectively, and non-relapse mortality was 0%. aTac-BEAM AHCT was tolerable in patients with high-risk R/R HL, and we are further evaluating the efficacy of this approach in a phase 2 trial. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01476839.

The inexpensive, well-tolerated, immunomodulatory agent leflunomide, used extensively for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, has been shown to produce significant activity against multiple myeloma (MM) in pre-clinical studies. We conducted a phase 1 study (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02509052) of single-agent leflunomide in patients with relapsed/refractory MM (≥3 prior therapies). At dose levels 1 and 2 (20 mg, 40 mg), no dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed. At dose level 3 (60 mg), one patient experienced elevated alanine aminotransferase; an additional three patients were enrolled at this dose level without further DLTs. Overall, toxicities were infrequent and manageable. Nine out of 11 patients achieved stable disease (SD), two subjects experiencing SD for nearly one year or longer. The tolerable safety profile of leflunomide, combined with a potential disease stabilization, is motivating future studies of leflunomide, in combination with other MM drugs, or as an approach to delay progression of smoldering MM.

This phase 2 trial evaluated PET-adapted nivolumab alone or in combination with ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide (NICE) as first salvage therapy and bridge to autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT) in relapsed/refractory (RR) classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). Patients with RR cHL received 240 mg nivolumab every 2 weeks for up to 6 cycles (C). Patients in complete response (CR) after C6 proceeded to AHCT, whereas patients with progressive disease at any point or not in CR after C6 received NICE for 2 cycles. The primary endpoint was CR rate per the 2014 Lugano classification at completion of protocol therapy. Forty-three patients were evaluable for toxicity; 42 were evaluable for response. Thirty-four patients received nivolumab alone, and 9 patients received nivolumab+NICE. No unexpected toxicities were observed after nivolumab or NICE. After nivolumab, the overall response rate (ORR) was 81%, and the CR rate was 71%. Among 9 patients who received NICE, all responded, with 8 (89%) achieving CR. At the end of protocol therapy, the ORR and CR rates were 93% and 91%. Thirty-three patients were bridged directly to AHCT, including 26 after Nivo alone. The 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival in all treated patients (n = 43) were 72% and 95%, respectively. Among 33 patients who bridged directly to AHCT, the 2-year PFS was 94% (95% CI: 78-98). PET-adapted sequential salvage therapy with nivolumab/nivolumab+NICE was well tolerated and effective, resulting in a high CR rate and bridging most patients to AHCT without chemotherapy. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov #NCT03016871.

BACKGROUND: Graft versus host disease (GVHD) has remained the main cause of posttransplantation mortality and morbidity after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT), adding significant economic burden and affecting quality of life. It would be desirable to reduce the rate of GVHD among patients in complete remission (CR) without increasing the risk of relapse. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we have tested a novel conditioning regimen of total marrow and lymphoid irradiation (TMLI) at 2000 cGy, together with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) for patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first or second CR, to attenuate the risk of chronic GVHD by using PTCy, while using escalated targeted radiation conditioning before allografting to offset the possible increased risk of relapse. The primary objective was to evaluate the safety/feasibility of combining a TMLI transplant conditioning regimen with a post-transplant high dose cyclophosphamide (PTCy)-based GVHD prophylaxis strategy, through the assessment of adverse events in terms of type, frequency, severity, attribution, time course, duration, and complications, including acute GVHD, infection, and delayed neutrophil/platelet engraftment. Secondary objectives included estimation of non-relapse mortality (NRM), OS, relapse-free survival, acute and chronic GVHD, and GVHD-relapse-free survival (GRFS). STUDY DESIGN: A patient safety lead-in was first conducted to ensure there were no unexpected toxicities and was expanded on the basis of lack of dose limiting toxicities (DLTs). The patient safety lead-in segment followed 3+3 dose expansion/(de-)escalation rules based on observed toxicity through day +30; the starting dose of TMLI was 2000 cGy, and a de-escalation to 1800 cGy was considered. After the safety lead-in segment, an expansion cohort of up to 12 additional patients was to be studied. TMLI was administered on days −4 to 0, delivered in 200 cGy fractions twice daily. The radiation dose delivered to the liver and brain was kept at 1200 cGy. Cyclophosphamide was given on days +3 and +4 after alloHCT, 50 mg/kg each day for GVHD prevention; tacrolimus was given until day +90 and then tapered. RESULTS: Among 18 patients with a median age of 40 years (range 19-56), the highest grade toxicities were grade 2 Bearman bladder toxicity and stomatitis. No grade 3-4 Bearman toxicities or toxicity-related deaths were observed. The cumulative incidence of acute GVHD (aGVHD) grade 2-4 and moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD were 11·1% and 11·9%, respectively. At a median follow up of 24·5 months, two-year estimates of OS and relapse-free survival were 86·7% and 83·3%, respectively. Disease relapse at 2 years was 16·7%. The estimates of NRM at 2 years was 0%. The GVHD−/relapse-free survival (GRFS) rate at 2 years was 59·3% (95%CI: 28·8-80·3). CONCLUSION: This chemotherapy-free conditioning regimen, together with PTCy and tacrolimus, is safe, with no NRM. Preliminary results suggest an improved GRFS rate.

Efficacy of PTCy after mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD) HCT is unknown. In this pilot clinical trial, we enrolled 38 patients with hematologic malignancies scheduled to undergo MMUD-HCT (≥6/8 HLA-matched donors) onto 1 of 2 conditioning strata: myeloablative using fludarabine and fractionated total body irradiation (n = 19) or reduced intensity with fludarabine/melphalan (n = 19). Graft source was peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs), and GVHD prophylaxis was PTCy, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil. Patients’ median age was 53 years (range, 21-72 years). Median number of HLA mismatches was 2 (range, 1-4) of 12 loci. Twenty-three patients (61%) were considered racial (n = 12) or ethnic (n = 11) minorities. Median time to neutrophil engraftment was 16 days (range, 13-35 days). With a median follow-up of 18.3 months (range, 4.3-25.0 months) for surviving patients, 1-year overall survival (OS) and GVHD-free/relapse-free survival (GRFS) were 87% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 71-94) and 68% (95% CI: 51-81), respectively. Cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality at 100 days and 1 year were 0% and 11% (95% CI: 4-27), respectively, whereas relapse/progression was 11% (95% CI: 4-27). Cumulative incidence of 100-day acute GVHD grades 2-4 and 3-4 and 1-year chronic GVHD were 50% (95% CI: 36-69), 18% (95% CI: 9-36), and 48% (95% CI: 34-68), respectively. The rate of moderate/severe chronic GVHD was 3% in the entire cohort. We showed highly promising OS/GRFS rates with an acceptable risk profile after PBSC-MMUD-HCT with PTCy. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03128359.

We report results of our prospective pilot trial evaluating safety/feasibility of peritransplantation ruxolitinib for myelofibrosis treatment. Primary objectives were to determine safety and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of ruxolitinib. Ruxolitinib was administered at 2 dose levels (DLs) of 5 and 10 mg twice daily, with fludarabine/melphalan conditioning regimen and tacrolimus/sirolimus graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. We enrolled 6 and 12 patients at DL1 and DL2, respectively. Median age at transplantation was 65 years (range, 25-73). Per Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System, 4 patients were high and 14 intermediate risk. Peripheral blood stem cells were graft source from matched sibling (n = 5) or unrelated (n = 13) donor. At each DL, 1 patient developed dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs): grade 3 cardiac and gastrointestinal with grade 4 pulmonary DLTs in DL1, and grade 3 kidney injury in DL2. All patients achieved engraftment. Grade 2 to 4 and 3 to 4 acute GVHD cumulative incidence was 17% (95% confidence interval [CI], 6-47) and 11% (95% CI, 3-41), respectively. Cumulative incidence of 1-year chronic GVHD was 42% (95% CI, 24-74). With 22.6-month (range, 6.2-25.8) median follow-up in surviving patients, 1-year overall and progression-free survival were 77% (95% CI, 50-91) and 71% (95% CI, 44-87), respectively. Causes of death (n = 4) were cardiac arrest, GVHD, respiratory failure, and refractory GVHD of liver. Our results show peritransplantation ruxolitinib is safe and well tolerated at MTD of 10 mg twice daily and associated with dose-dependent pharmacokinetic and cytokine profile. Early efficacy data are highly promising in high-risk older patients with myelofibrosis. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02917096.

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is associated with poor survival in older adults, and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) with reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) has been an increasingly used strategy in this population. At City of Hope we conducted a retrospective analysis of 72 patients who underwent allogeneic HCT with fludarabine and melphalan (FluMel) as the conditioning regimen between 2005 and 2018, from either a matched sibling or fully matched unrelated donor while in complete remission. Tacrolimus and sirolimus (T/S) were used as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. Overall survival and progression-free survival at 4 years post-HCT were 58% and 44%, respectively. The cumulative incidences of relapse/progression and nonrelapse mortality at 4 years were 34% and 22%, respectively. Patients with Philadelphia chromosome–positive (Ph+) ALL had a significantly lower cumulative incidence of relapse/progression (20% versus 48% for patients with Ph-negative status, P = .007). In conclusion, RIC HCT with FluMel conditioning and T/S GVHD prophylaxis was associated with favorable outcomes in patients with Ph+ ALL and should be considered as a viable consolidative therapy for adult patients with ALL.

Therapy-related acute lymphoblastic leukemia remains poorly defined due to a lack of large data sets recognizing the defining characteristics of this entity. We reviewed all consecutive cases of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated at our institution between 2000 and 2017 and identified therapy-related cases - defined as acute lymphoblastic leukemia preceded by prior exposure to cytotoxic chemotherapy and/or radiation. Of 1022 patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, 93 (9.1%) were classified as therapy-related. The median latency for therapy-related acute lymphoblastic leukemia onset was 6.8 years from original diagnosis, and this was shorter for patients carrying the MLL gene rearrangement compared to those with other cytogenetics. When compared to de novo acute lymphoblastic leukemia, therapy-related patients were older (P

In this phase I/II trial, a triplet regimen of ixazomib (Ixa: 3 or 4 mg), pomalidomide (Pom: 4 mg), and dexamethasone (Dex: 40 mg) was administered to 32 lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma (MM) patients; 31 were evaluable for response and toxicity. At dose level 1 (DL1, 3 mg Ixa), 1/3 patients experienced grade 3 fatigue, grade 3 lung infection, grade 4 neutropenia, and grade 4 thrombocytopenia; all were considered dose-limiting. Per 3 + 3 phase I design, an additional three patients were enrolled to DL1, with no further dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). At dose level 2 (DL2, 4 mg Ixa), 1/3 patients had dose-limiting febrile neutropenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia (grade 4 each). DL2 was expanded to enroll three additional patients with no further DLT, establishing the recommended phase II dose (RP2D). In phase II, 19 additional patients were treated at RP2D. With a median follow-up of 11.9 months, 48% achieved ≥ partial response (PR), with 5 patients (20%) achieving very good partial response (VGPR) and 76% experiencing ≥ stable disease. The most common adverse events (≥grade 2) were anemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and infections. Peripheral neuropathy was infrequent. In summary, Ixa/Pom/Dex is a well-tolerated and effective oral combination therapy for patients with relapsed/refractory MM.

Background: In November 2020, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued emergency use authorization (EUA) for monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapy in patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 who are at high risk for disease progression. These mAbs reduce the risk of hospitalization in the general population. However, its efficacy and safety in immunocompromised hematology patients are not known. Methods: From November 9th, 2020, until February 28th, 2021, all adult hematology patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 disease who received monoclonal antibodies within 10 days of symptoms onset were included. Patients who were asymptomatic, had severe or critical COVID-19 disease, or were hospitalized at the time of COVID-19 diagnosis were excluded. Baseline demographic, clinical outcomes, and hematologic-related data were extracted. All statistical analysis was performed using SAS statistical software. Results: Thirty-eight hematology patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 disease who received mAb therapy under EUA were included in this study. Thirty (79%) patients received bamlanivimab and 8 (21%) casirivimab-imdevimab. Baseline characteristics prior to mAB administration include: 53% female, median age of 51 years (range: 21-80), with 18% above 65 years old. Twenty-eight (74%) patients received cellular therapy: 18 (47%) had undergone allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), 9 (24%) autologous HCT, and 1 (3%) chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapy. Among the 17 patients who had COVID-19 disease after HCT, the median time to COVID-19 diagnosis was 22.8 months (range: 2.6-274.4) from HCT to COVID-19 diagnosis. Twelve out of 17 (71%) alloHCT patients were being managed for active graft-vs-host disease (GvHD) at the time of COVID-19 diagnosis (chronic GVHD: n=11 [mild: 4, moderate: 4, severe: 3], acute GVHD (grade 2): n=1). Ten (59%) alloHCT patients were on immunosuppressant therapy at the time of COVID-19 diagnosis. Fifteen (39%) patients were on active treatment for their hematologic malignancy (HM) at the time of COVID-19 diagnosis with a mean of 3 previous lines of treatment (range: 1-6). Additional patient characteristics are shown in Table 1. mAb therapy under EUA was well tolerated in this patient population with only 1 (3%) patient having experienced an adverse reaction characterized as headache. Four (11%) patients were hospitalized due to COVID-19, and 2 (5%) progressed to severe disease. All four patients had received bamlanivimab. The median time for hospitalization from diagnosis of COVID-19 to admission date was 8 days (range: 1-20) while median time from mAB infusion to hospitalization was 7.5 days (range: 0-17). One patient (3%) died within 30 days of COVID-19 diagnosis; the cause of death was COVID-19 disease. Most patients (n=34, 89%) ultimately tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 by PCR after mAb infusion. 34% of patients (n=13) cleared the virus within 2 weeks of receiving mAb infsuion. The median time to clearance of viral shedding was 25.5 days (range: 7-138). After mAb infusion, most patients (10/15; 67%) who were previously on active treatment for HM prior to diagnosis of COVID-19 resumed therapy for their HM with a median delay of 21.5 days (range: 12-42). We observed a significant difference in hospitalization was amongst patients who received a HCT vs. non-HCT (0%, 0/26 and 36%, 4/11 respectively; p Conclusion: This study demonstrates that SARS-COV2 specific mAb use in malignant hematology patients under EUA was safe and may reduce hospitalization as reported in the literature amongst those at high risk for disease progression. Thus, the access to SARS-COV2 mAb in this population who is at increased risk for complications from SARS-COV2 infection is critical in reducing progression to severe COVID-19 disease and hospitalization. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Ali: Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; CTI BioPharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Speakers Bureau. Aribi: Seagen: Consultancy. Artz: Radiology Partners: Other: Spouse has equity interest in Radiology Partners, a private radiology physician practice. Koller: Novartis: Consultancy. Nikolaenko: Rafael Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Shouse: Beigene: Honoraria; Kite Pharma: Speakers Bureau. Stein: Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Stemline: Speakers Bureau. Marcucci: Abbvie: Other: Speaker and advisory scientific board meetings; Novartis: Other: Speaker and advisory scientific board meetings; Agios: Other: Speaker and advisory scientific board meetings. Forman: Mustang Bio: Consultancy, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company; Lixte Biotechnology: Consultancy, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company; Allogene: Consultancy. Dadwal: AlloVir: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Speakers Bureau; Shire/Takeda: Research Funding; Aseptiscope: Consultancy; Janssen: Other: Investigator; Karius: Other: Investigator. Al Malki: CareDx: Consultancy; Rigel Pharma: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy; Neximmune: Consultancy; Hansa Biopharma: Consultancy.

Background: Blinatumomab, a bispecific anti-CD19/CD3 antibody, demonstrated single-agent efficacy with 42% CR/CRh in R/R B-ALL. Upregulation of immune inhibitory molecules has been shown to confer resistance to blinatumomab. Here, we set out to test the combination of pembrolizumab and blinatumomab in a phase 1/2 trial (NCT03512405). Methods: Pts [≥18 years old (yo); ECOG Results: As of February 1, 2021, 7 pts were enrolled to phase 1, with one unevaluable. Six treated and evaluable pts received a median of 2 (1–5) cycles of treatment. At baseline, the median age was 51 yo (29–74) with median 2 (2–4) prior lines of regimens and median 29% (0–83) BM blasts. Two pts had extramedullary disease. In cycle 1, all 6 pts experienced grade (gr) 1–2 cytokine release syndrome. Neurologic toxicities were all reversible with only 1 ≥ gr3 AE. All-non-hematologic gr3 toxicities, were reversible. No dose-limiting toxicity, ≥ gr4 non-hematologic toxicity, or treatment-related deaths were seen. Five of 6 evaluable pts (83%) achieved MRD-negative CR after a median of 1 (1–2) cycle. Three pts in CR received alloHCT, all engrafted. With a median follow-up of 2.8 (1.1–9.6) months, 4 CRs are ongoing (1 post-transplant), and 5 of 6 pts are still alive at the data cut-off. Conclusions: The combination of pembrolizumab and blinatumomab in phase 1 of this study in pts with B-ALL was deemed safe with a manageable side effect profile and encouraging anti-leukemic activity. The study is now open for phase 2 with the primary objective of overall response rate.

Standard-dose 90yttrium-ibritumomab tiuxetan (.4 mci/kg) together with high-dose BEAM (BCNU, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan) (Z-BEAM) has been shown to be a well-tolerated autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation preparative regimen for non-Hodgkin lymphoma. We report the outcomes of a single-center, single-arm phase II trial of Z-BEAM conditioning in high-risk CD20+ non-Hodgkin lymphoma histologic strata: diffuse large B cell (DLBCL), mantle cell, follicular, and transformed. Robust overall survival and notably low nonrelapse mortality rates (.9% at day +100 for the entire cohort), with few short- and long-term toxicities, confirm the safety and tolerability of the regimen. In addition, despite a high proportion of induction failure patients (46%), the promising response and progression-free survival (PFS) rates seen in DLBCL (3-year PFS: 71%; 95% confidence interval, 55 to 82%), support the premise that the Z-BEAM regimen is particularly effective in this histologic subtype. The role of Z-BEAM in other strata is less clear in the context of the emergence of novel agents.

Background: Peripheral T cell lymphomas (PTCL) have a poor prognosis with current treatment regimens. High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) has been used as a consolidation strategy in remission states (CR1 or above) endorsed by the NCCN guidelines in appropriate patients. 5-year DFS is reported at 70% for alk -ve anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) and 30-40% for most other histologies (D'Amore et al, 2012, JCO). It is also performed in the relapsed settings if no previous ASCT performed and allogeneic transplant is not an option. CD25 is a targetable protein expressed differentially in PTCL and antibody based anti-CD25 therapies are efficacious in PTCL i.e denileukin diftitox (Foss et al Blood 2006, Dang et al, BJH 2006) , monoclonal antibody dacluzimab (Waldman et al 1995 Blood). Yttrium-90 (90Y) labeled chimeric antiCD25 antibody basiliximab emits beta particles and has been shown to inhibit the growth of human ALCL tumors and increase survival in SUDHL-1 xenograft mice (Zhang et al 2009 Cancer Biother Radiopharm). Previous investigations at COH by Raubitschek, Colcher et al established a safe does of Yttrium-90 (90Y) labeled basiliximab at 0.4mCi/kg in combination with BEAM. This is a phase 1 clinical trial of a novel conditioning regimen that includes the use of Yttrium-90 (90Y) labeled basiliximab with BEAM chemotherapy for PTCL patients eligible for ASCT. The trial utilizes a modified version of the rolling 6 design (Skolnik et al) to test 3 dose levels of Yttrium-90 (90Y) Basiliximab i.e 0.4mCi/kg, 0.5miC/kg and 0.6mCi/kg with the primary objective of evaluating the safety and tolerability of this combination and to establish the MTD. Secondary objectives include estimating incidence of relapse, OS, PFS, NRM at day 100, 1 year and 2 years post-transplant. Patients and Methods: Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) is defined according to the Bearman and CTCAE 4.03 scales, the latter for hematologic toxicity. The study/treatment schema is shown in Figure 1. Results: From 07/29/2015 to 06/10/2020, 20 patients underwent ASCT on this trial; n=4 at 0.4mCi/kg n=4 at 0.5mCi/kg and n=12 at 0.6mCi/kg. Median age at ASCT was 51 years (range: 18-76), and histologies included; PTCL-nos (n=10); alk-ve ALCL (n=5); angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (n=3); and intestinal T-cell lymphoma (n=2). Disease status at ASCT were CR1 in18, CR2 in 2 patients. Median number of prior therapies was 1 (range: 1-4). At a median follow-up of 17.1 months (range: 0.9-26.2), 12 patients remain in remission, 8 have relapsed out of which 5 have died of progressive lymphoma. OS was 100% (95% CI: N/A) at 100-days, and 83% (95% CI: 57-94) at 1 year. Non-relapse Mortality was 0% at both 100-days and 1-year. All patients successfully engrafted with the median days to ANC >= 500/ul was 10 (range: 10 - 21), and days to PLT >= 20,000/ul: 13 (12 - 92). Overall, no dose limiting toxicities were experienced. The most common/highest grade toxicity experienced (per Bearman Scale) was grade 2 stomatitis, which was seen in 3 patients at 0.4mCi/kg; 4 patients at 0.5 mCi/kg, and 7 at0.6mCi/kg. The only other toxicities seen were grade 2 GI in 2 patients at 0.4mCi/kg, and grade 2 bladder in one patient at 0.6mCi/kg dose.. Toxicities >grade 2 were not seen. Conclusion: aTac- BEAM appears to be safe as an ASCT conditioning regimen for PTCL with no increased toxicity as compared to the historical toxicities seen with BEAM alone in this patient population (D'Amore 2012 J of Clin Onc). The dose level 0.6mCi/kg will likely be the recommended phase II dose. An expanded phase is planned to evaluate the efficacy of this regimen followed by a randomized trial of BEAM alone plus a combination of aTac- BEAM. Figure 1 Disclosures Zain: Mundi Pharma: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Kyowa Kirin: Research Funding. Herrera:Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Immune Design: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Genentech, Inc./F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accomodations, Expenses, Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding. Salhotra:Kadmon: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding. Nakamura:NapaJen Pharma: Consultancy; Celgene: Other: Support on seminar; Magenta Therapeutics: Other: Advisory board meeting; Viracor: Consultancy; Merck: Other: advisory board meeting; Alexion: Other: Support on a meeting presentation; Kyowa-Kirin: Other: Support on a meeting presentation; Kadmon Corporation: Other: Advisory board meeting. OffLabel Disclosure: Yittrium labelled Basiliximab

Background: Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) is the approach that offers the highest curative rate for acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) with intermediate or high-risk cytogenetics. Graft versus host disease (GvHD) has remained the main cause of post-transplantation mortality and morbidity, despite advances in prophylaxis and therapy, adding significant economic burden and affecting quality of life. It would be desirable to reduce the rate of GvHD among patients in complete remission (CR) without increasing the risk of relapse. In this study, we have developed a novel conditioning regimen of total marrow and lymphoid irradiation (TMLI) at 2000 cGy, together with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy), to 1) reduce the possibly increased risk of relapse from PTCy, by using escalated radiation doses of TMLI, as increasing radiation doses has the potential to decrease the post-transplantation relapse rate (Blood, vol 76, pp. 1867-1871, 1990); and 2) reduce the risk of chronic GvHD by using PTCy. The major goal of this pilot study of TMLI and PTCy (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03467386), was to thus improve GvHD-free/relapse-free survival (GRFS), reported to be 45% from total body irradiation (TBI) and tacrolimus/sirolimus prophylaxis (BBMT, vol 26(2), pp. 292-299, 2020), in patients with AML in remission. Patients and Methods: A total of 18 patients were enrolled and treated (see Table) between March 2018 and December 2019. Key criteria were ages 18 to 60, first or second CR, minimal residual disease negative by multi-color flow cytometry, and normal organ function. TMLI was administered on days -4 to 0 without addition of chemotherapy. The radiation dose for all patients (n=18) was 2000 cGy, delivered in 200 cGy fractions twice daily. The radiation dose delivered to the liver and brain was kept at 1200 cGy. Remaining organs were considered non-targeted. All patients received peripheral blood stem cells on day 0. Cyclophosphamide was given on days +3 and +4, 50 mg/kg each day for GVHD prevention. Tacrolimus, 1 mg continuous infusion adjusted to maintain levels from 5 to 10 ng/mL was given from day +5 to day +90, and G-CSF 5 µg/kg daily was administered at day +5 until recovery of neutrophil counts. Endpoints included toxicity, GRFS at 1 year, engraftment, overall survival (OS), and non-relapse mortality (NRM). Toxicities were defined according to the Bearman and CTCAE 4.03 scales, the latter for hematologic toxicity. A patient safety lead-in segment (n=6) was conducted to ensure that there were no unexpected toxicities, allowing for a dose de-escalation to 1800 cGy. GRFS was defined as grade 3-4 acute GvHD, chronic GvHD requiring systemic treatment, relapse, or death (from any cause), whichever occurred first. Results: Bearman toxicity data are available for all patients. Among these patients, grade 2 toxicities were bladder toxicity and stomatitis. No grade 3-4 toxicities or toxicity-related deaths were observed. Acute GVHD (aGVHD) developed in 2 of patients (100-day Grade II-IV aGVHD: 11.1%, 95%CI: 1.7-30.4); of those, only 1 patient developed Grades III-IV (100-day Grade III-IV aGVHD: 5.6%, 95%CI: 0.3-23.1). Five patients developed mild chronic GVHD (1-year cGVHD rate: 28.6%, 95%CI: 7.5%-54.7%). The GRFS rate at 1 year was 59.3% (95% CI: 28.8-80.3) (Figure). The median follow up was 11.3 months (range 4.7 to 25.4) for surviving patients (n=17). All patients engrafted. Time to neutrophil and platelet recovery were 14 days (range 13-32 days) and 20 days (range 11-49 days), respectively. One-year estimates of OS and relapse-free survival were 100% and 80.8% (95% CI: 50.5-93.6), respectively (Figure). Disease relapse at 1 year was 19.2% (95% CI: 4.1-42.6). The estimates of NRM at 100 days and 1 year were both 0%. Relapsed disease after transplant occurred in 3 patients (16.7%). One patient died after relapse. Conclusions: 1) This chemotherapy-free conditioning regimen, together with PTCy and tacrolimus, is safe and feasible, with no NRM. 2) All patients achieved engraftment. 3) Participants with ≥1 year follow-up have discontinued immunosuppressive therapy, reducing financial burden and leading to improved quality of life. The preliminary results suggest an improved GRFS rate. A larger phase 2 trial is in preparation to corroborate these data. Disclosures Stein: Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Stemline: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Al Malki:Neximmune: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmacuticals, Inc: Consultancy; Rigel Pharma: Consultancy. Ali:Incyte Corporation: Consultancy. Aribi:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy. Marcucci:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Other: Research Support (Investigation Initiated Clinical Trial); Pfizer: Other: Research Support (Investigation Initiated Clinical Trial); Abbvie: Speakers Bureau; Merck: Other: Research Support (Investigation Initiated Clinical Trial); Iaso Bio: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Nakamura:Alexion: Other: Support on a meeting presentation; Kyowa-Kirin: Other: Support on a meeting presentation; Merck: Other: advisory board meeting; Celgene: Other: Support on seminar; Magenta Therapeutics: Other: Advisory board meeting; Viracor: Consultancy; Kadmon Corporation: Other: Advisory board meeting; NapaJen Pharma: Consultancy. Pullarkat:AbbVie, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Genetech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Dova: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Salhotra:Celgene: Research Funding; Kadmon: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Mismatched unrelated donors (MMUD) has improved access to hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for underrepresented minority groups. However, MMUD HCT is historically associated with inferior outcomes primarily due to the increased risk of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), when conventional calcineurin inhibitor-based GvHD prophylaxis is used. Post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) is an established and effective agent as part of GvHD prophylaxis post haploidentical HCT, which has been increasingly used in the matched donor HCT setting. To date, there have been no prospective studies reporting the efficacy of PTCy after peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) MMUD HCT. Here, we conducted a pilot trial to estimate the GVHD-free relapse/progression-free survival (GRFS) at one-year post HCT and to evaluate the efficacy of PTCy as GvHD prophylaxis using either an ablative or reduced intensity conditioning regimen after PBSC MMUD HCT (NCT 03128359). Patients with hematologic malignancies (n=38), who were ≤75 years old, had KPS of ≥70%, and were scheduled for HCT from a 7/8 HLA-matched (A-, B-, C-, and DR-) donor were eligible. Patients received myeloablative conditioning (MAC, n=19) using Fludarabine (90 mg/m2) and FTBI (1200 cGy), or reduced intensity conditioning (RIC, n=19) using Fludarabine (100 mg/m2) and Melphalan (140 mg/m2 or 100 mg/m2 if >60 years old). All patients received GCSF-mobilized PBSC as the graft source. GvHD prophylaxis consisted of PTCy (50mg/kg x2 days), Tacrolimus (1mg/d), and MMF (1g x3/d). Overall, patients' median age at HCT was 53 years (range: 21-72), and 50% were male. HCT indication was AML (n=17), ALL (n=8), MDS (n=6), CML (n=3), NHL (n=3), or CLL (n=1). DRI was low in 18 (47%), intermediate in 14 (37%) and high/very high in 6 (16%) patients. At HCT, 29 patients were in complete remission and 9 had active disease (Median BM blast: 3.4, range: 0-7). HCT-CI was >2 in 17 patients (45%). Donors (median age: 32 years, range: 19-53) were mismatched at HLA-A (n=15), -B (n=12), -C (n=8), or DR-loci (n=5) with the median number of mismatches of 2 (range: 1-4) out of 12. The median CD34+ cell dose was 5.45×106/kg (range: 2.39-9.35). Median time to neutrophil engraftment was 16 days (range: 13-35). Complete donor chimerism (>99% if PCR or 95% if STR) was achieved in 36 patients (95%) by day 30 ± 7 days. With a median follow-up period of 18.1 months (range: 4.6 - 25.0), 1-year overall survival (OS) and GRFS were 87% (95% CI: 71-94) and 68% (95% CI: 51-81), respectively (Figure). Non-relapse mortality and relapse rate at 1 year were 11% (95% CI:4-27) and 11% (95% CI: 4-27), respectively (Figure). Cumulative incidence of day 100 acute GvHD grade 2-4 and 3-4 were 51% (95% CI: 38-70) and 19% (95% CI: 10-37), respectively. By NIH criteria, 1-year chronic GvHD was 52% (95% CI: 37-72) with moderate/severe chronic GvHD in 3% (95% CI 0.4-19). By exploratory post-hoc univariable analysis, RIC (vs. MAC) and intermediate/high-risk DRI (vs. low risk) were associated with worse GRFS (HR=4.7, 95%CI: 1.3-16.8, p=0.01 and HR=3.8, 95%CI: 1.1-13.8, p=0.04, respectively). The class and number of HLA mismatch, CD34+ cell dose, and absolute lymphocyte count were not predictive of GRFS. Infectious complications from Day -9 to +100 included CMV viremia (n=16) respiratory infections (n=5, 2 patients with lower respiratory), and BK virus cystitis (n=5). Fifteen patients had bacteremia (6 with GNR) and 4 had C. difficile colitis. Correlative flow-cytometry data was available for 29 patients. T cells reconstitution (>300/ul) was seen in 17 patients (59%) by day 100 (n=11) or day 180 (n=6). NK cell recovery (>150/ul) was seen in 24 patients (85.7%) by day 28 (n=9), day 100 (n=11), or day 180 (n=4). NK cells were predominantly highly cytotoxic CD3-CD56dim. Regulatory T cell counts on day 30 was associated with GRFS: median: 0.20/ul (range: 0.04-2.21) in the group with GRFS event (n=8) compared with 0.68/ul (range: 0.08-23.0, p=0.03) in the group with no GRFS event (n=19). Our pilot trial showed highly promising OS/GRFS in patients receiving PBSC MMUD HCT, indicating that PTCy is an effective GvHD prophylaxis platform in this setting. Our data support further development of PTCy in MMUD HCT to improve the access to and outcome of HCT in patients with hematologic disorders who have otherwise no suitable donor. Figure Disclosures Al Malki: Neximmune: Consultancy; Rigel Pharma: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmacuticals, Inc: Consultancy. Ali:Incyte Corporation: Consultancy. Stein:Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Stemline: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Marcucci:Merck: Other: Research Support (Investigation Initiated Clinical Trial); Takeda: Other: Research Support (Investigation Initiated Clinical Trial); Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Other: Research Support (Investigation Initiated Clinical Trial); Abbvie: Speakers Bureau; Iaso Bio: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Nakamura:Merck: Other: advisory board meeting; NapaJen Pharma: Consultancy; Kadmon Corporation: Other: Advisory board meeting; Kyowa-Kirin: Other: Support on a meeting presentation; Alexion: Other: Support on a meeting presentation; Celgene: Other: Support on seminar; Magenta Therapeutics: Other: Advisory board meeting; Viracor: Consultancy.

Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is the only potential curative option for many advanced hematologic diseases. Pediatrics, adolescent and young adult (PAYA) patients overall have less pre-HCT comorbidity or organ toxicity and lower transplant related morbidity and mortality risk compared to older adults. As such, a higher percentage of patients in this age group tend to receive myeloablative conditioning (MAC) over non-myeloablative regimens. Current alternative donor sources when a matched sibling donor (MSD) is not available include matched unrelated (MUD), umbilical cord blood (UCB), and haploidentical (Haplo) donors. While there are accumulating data comparing the HCT outcomes between MUD vs. Haplo or UCB in adult patients, the data are sparse in PAYA patients. In this retrospective study, we reviewed 314 consecutive patients aged 1-39 years who underwent their first allogeneic HCT using MAC at City of Hope between 1/2005-7/2018. Patients who received HCT from a matched sibling donor were excluded. Patients received HCT from either an 8/8 HLA MUD (n=196 [BM= 27%, PBSC= 73%]), UCB (n=83 [single: n=30, double: n=53]) or Haplo (n=35) donor. The most used MAC regimens were fractionated total body irradiation-based (n=234, 74%). All Haplo recipients got post-HCT cyclophosphamide (PTCy) as GVHD prophylaxis. To adjust for the difference in transplant era between UCB (predominantly performed in earlier years) and Haplo (carried out predominantly in more recent years) the comparative analyses were focused on Haplo or UCB vs. MUD. Univariate and multivariable Cox regression models were used to assess the impact of patient, disease, and treatment factors on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), relapse/progression (RP), and non-relapse mortality (NRM). Median age of patients at the time of HCT was 24 years (range: 0.7-39), with 55% of patients being male. KPS was ≥80% in 88% of the patients and 25% had HCT-CI ≥ 2. The most common diagnoses included: ALL (48%), AML (41%), and MDS/CML (11%). DRI was high/very high in 44% of patients. Groups were balanced in general but patients in the Haplo group had higher HCT-CI (median: 2, p Neutrophil engraftment was achieved at a median of 23 days (range: 10-94) in the UCB, 16 days (range: 12-32) in the Haplo and 15 days (range: 10-33) in the MUD (p In conclusion, our results indicated that in PAYA patients without a suitable MSD, outcomes of Haplo HCT are comparable to MUD HCT. By univariate analysis, UCB HCT was associated with a lower relapse rate compared to MUD. However, survival was worse in recipients of UCB HCT due to the higher NRM, possibly resulted from more infections and engraftment delays in these patients. Figure 1 Disclosures Ali: Incyte Corporation: Consultancy. Nakamura:Viracor: Consultancy; Kadmon Corporation: Other: Advisory board meeting; NapaJen Pharma: Consultancy; Celgene: Other: Support on seminar; Magenta Therapeutics: Other: Advisory board meeting; Alexion: Other: Support on a meeting presentation; Merck: Other: advisory board meeting; Kyowa-Kirin: Other: Support on a meeting presentation. Al Malki:Jazz Pharmacuticals, Inc: Consultancy; Neximmune: Consultancy; Rigel Pharma: Consultancy.

The prognostic relevance of cytogenetics at diagnosis on the outcome of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHCT) for adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) remains unclear. We retrospectively analyzed outcomes of 333 adult ALL patients who underwent alloHCT at our institution over a 10-year period. Patients were classified according to disease status at transplantation (complete response [CR] 1 [n = 202] or > CR1) and according to cytogenetic risk, defined as good (2%), intermediate (42%), poor (46%), or unknown (10%) based on available outcome data for each of the cytogenetic abnormalities. Three-year overall survival (OS), leukemia-free survival (LFS), and relapse incidence (RI) were 55.7%, 47.9% and 27.5%, respectively; 1-year nonrelapse mortality (NRM) was 17.3%. For patients undergoing alloHCT in CR1, 3-year OS, LFS, and RI were 69.8%, 62.3%, and 17.1%, respectively. In multivariable analysis, cytogenetic risk did not impact OS or LFS for the whole cohort or for patients who underwent transplantation in CR1. Disease status at alloHCT was an independent predictor for LFS (CR1 versus others: hazard ratio [HR], 3.17; P

Plerixafor has been used to improve peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization in multiple myeloma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and very recently in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients. Because prior studies have suggested that mobilization with plerixafor affects the composition of mobilized cells, there are concerns that this may in turn adversely impact the immune reconstitution and longer term outcomes of transplanted patients. However, data on the engraftment characteristics and long-term post-transplant outcomes in patients transplanted with plerixafor-mobilized PBSCs are lacking. This retrospective study examined the post-transplant outcomes of 105 consecutive adult HL patients, and compared the post-transplant outcomes of 21 patients who received plerixafor in addition to G-CSF ± chemotherapy because of poor mobilization with those of 84 patients who mobilized well without plerixafor. Despite collecting significantly lower CD34+ cell doses (median of 3.41 vs. 6.05 × 106 /kg, p

Allelic variants of genes implicated in drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) determine the pharmacokinetic variability of many medications and are increasingly recognized as important factors determining the success or failure of medical treatments. Both tacrolimus and sirolimus have narrow therapeutic ranges maintained by therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Using an ADME panel that covers >99% of the PharmaADME working group core list (188 single nucleotide polymorphism [SNP] and 12 copy number variant [CNV] assays in 36 pharmacogenetically relevant genes), we studied 177 patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) using tacrolimus/sirolimus–based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. We tested for possible associations between ADME variants and tacrolimus/sirolimus drug levels, concentration/dose (C/D) ratio, and clinical endpoints, including acute GVHD. A total of 62 SNP and 6 CNV assays were evaluable after removing the variants, which were homozygous in (nearly) all samples. For sirolimus, rs2032582 (ABCB1) T-carriers versus non–T-carriers were associated with higher blood levels (P = .01), with similar results for C/D ratio. Generalized estimating equation analysis supported these findings. For tacrolimus, rs776746 CYP3A5*3/*3 and CYP3A5*3/*1 were associated with higher blood levels than CYP3A5*1/*1 (P = .002). By multivariable analysis, rs776746 CYP3A5*3/*3 and CYP3A5*3/*1 were independently associated with decreased acute GVHD compared with CYP3A5*1/*1, after adjustment for conditioning, donor type, race/ethnicity, and age. We demonstrated association of specific ADME genetic polymorphisms with blood levels of tacrolimus/sirolimus, and incidence of acute GVHD after HCT, in spite of TDM and dose adjustment. A larger ongoing study will determine whether these associations have clinical utility beyond TDM.

Introduction Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) comprise 15-20% of adult non-Hodgkin lymphoma and have a poor prognosis; 5-year survival is less than 30% for the most aggressive subtypes. Allogeneic HCT (allo-HCT) is offered to eligible patients as a potentially curative modality in the salvage setting or in high risk patients to consolidate an initial response to frontline therapy. Objective To report clinical outcomes derived from large sample size and long-term follow up data. Methods We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 87 consecutive patients with PTCL who underwent allo-HCT at City of Hope from January 2000 to June 2018. Baseline patient demographic, treatment, and disease characteristics were summarized by descriptive statistics. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test. Cumulative incidences of time to relapse and time to non-relapse mortality (NRM) were calculated with relapse and NRM as competing risks. Cumulative incidences of acute and chronic GVHD were calculated as time to onset of GVHD with relapse and death as competing events for GVHD. Results Median age at allo-HCT was 49 (range 2-70) years. Histologies were PTCL-NOS (n=21); transformed CTCL (n=19); NK TCL (n=17); AITL (n=15), ALCL (n=7); γδTCL (n=6) and other rare subtypes (n=2). No patients had a prior auto transplant. 42 patients (48%) had myeloablative conditioning; FTBI-based (n=39), or BEAM regimen (n=3). 45 patients (52%) had reduced intensity conditioning with a fludarabine/melphalan based regimen in 39. Sibling HCT was done in 47 (54%) patients. MUD HCT was done in 36 (41%); donors were fully HLA matched for 15 (17%) patients and mismatched in 21 (24%); 4 (5%) got haploidentical HCT. The most common GVHD prophylaxis was tacrolimus/sirolimus (n=54). Stem cell source was PBSC in 77 (88%), bone marrow in 5 (6%), and cord blood in 5 (6%) patients. At allo-HCT 25 (29%) patients were in complete remission, 25 (29%) in partial remission, 22 (25%) with induction failure and 14 (16%) with relapsed disease. The median follow-up among survivors was 6.9 years (range 1.1-15.5). The 5- and 10-year PFS was 47% (95% CI: 36%-58%) and 38% (95% CI: 26%-50%), respectively. The 5- and 10-year OS was 53% (95% CI: 41%-63%) and 42% (95% CI: 29%-54%), respectively (Fig.1). At day 100 after allo-HCT, the rate of acute GVHD grade II-IV was 41% (95% CI: 30%-51). Chronic GVHD rates at 3 years were 62% (95% CI: 51%-72%), with extensive GVHD of 55% (95% CI: 44%-65%). On univariate analysis, age (> 60 or not), sex, TBI-based conditioning, donor type, stem cell source or remission status prior to allo-HCT did not predict for OS. Conclusions This large single-institution series with a long-term follow-up on allo-HCT outcomes in patients with high-risk, aggressive T-cell NHL shows encouraging survival outcomes for these patients with limited treatment options.

Despite of the continuous increase in the number of volunteer donors available through the registry, many patients who require an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) cannot find a fully-matched donor. While a mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD) is frequently available, it is associated with inferior outcomes and increased risk of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). Post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) has been effective in haploidentical HCT, and increasingly used in matched donor HCTs. However, limited data exist in MMUD setting. We conducted a prospective single center trial (NCT 03128359) of PTCy for MMUD HCT with the primary objective of estimating 1-year GvHD-free relapse/progression-free survival (GRFS). As of October 2019, all planned 39 patients have been enrolled with a median follow up of 11 months (range: 1-23). Here we present the preliminary estimate of 1-year GRFS and other HCT outcomes in two strata; myeloablative conditioning (n=19) using Fludarabine (90 mg/m2) and FTBI (1200 cGy) or reduced intensity conditioning (n=19) using Fludarabine (100 mg/m2) and Melphalan (140 mg/m2 or 100 mg/m2 if >60 years old). Patients between 0 to 75 years of age and KPS of ≥70% with hematologic malignancies undergoing HCT from a 7/8 HLA-matched (A-, B-, C-, and DR-) donor were eligible. Patients with donor specific antibodies to the mismatched HLA-locus were excluded. All patient received PBMCs (3-5 × 106/kg) followed by GVHD prophylaxis consisting of PTCy (50 mg/kg for 2 days), Tacrolimus (1 mg), and mycophenolate mofetil (1 gr 3 × a day). Median age at the time of HCT was 53 years (range: 21-72), and 50% of patients were male. Disease risk was low in 47% (n=18), intermediate in 37% (n=14), and high in 16% of the patients (n=6). At transplant, 29 patients were in complete remission, and 9 had active disease. HCT-CI was 0 in six (16%) and 1-2 in 15 (39%) and >2 in 17 (45%) patients. Donors' median age was 32 years (range: 19-53) and donors were mismatched at HLA-A (n=14), -B (n=12), -C (n=8), or DR-loci (n=5). Median number of mismatches was 2 of 12 (range: 1-4). Female to male donor HCT was in 11% of recipients. Neutrophil engraftment occurred in all patients (median time to engraft: 16 days; range 13-35). One-year overall survival (OS) and GRFS were 92% (95% CI: 70-98) and 70% (95% CI: 51-83), respectively. Non-relapse mortality and relapse rate at 1 year were at 8% (95% CI: 2-29) and 13% (95% CI: 5-34), respectively. Cumulative incidence of day 100 acute GvHD grade 2-4 was 50% (95% CI: 35-71) and 1-year chronic GvHD was 56% (95% CI: 39-81). No severe chronic GvHD by the NIH criteria was observed. In conclusion, the data from our phase II trial of PTCy showed highly promising OS/GRFS in patients receiving 7/8 MMUD HCT, and that PTCy in MMUD setting offers an alternative and effective HCT approach for patients who do not have an available matched donor.

Pegylated asparaginase (PEG-Asp), a key component in the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), is associated with coagulopathy and an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). PEG-Asp also lowers antithrombin (AT) levels. Between April 2014 and October 2017, 75 adult ALL patients were identified to have received at least one dose of PEG-Asp. Patients were assigned to the AT group if a physician monitored AT levels with an intention to correct low AT levels (60%). Incidence of VTE was not significantly different, with 17% (8/47) of the AT patients and 11% (3/28) of the control patients experiencing a VTE event (p = .52). The occurrence of coagulopathies was not significantly different. Within the AT group, 37 patients (78%) received AT, and median AT% prior to supplementation was 49%. The median number of AT doses received was 2 (range 0-12) and the mean cost of AT per patient was $11,847.

Current conditioning regimens provide insufficient disease control in relapsed/refractory acute leukemia patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) with active disease. Intensification of chemotherapy and/or total body irradiation (TBI) is not feasible because of excessive toxicity. Total marrow and lymphoid irradiation (TMLI) allows for precise delivery and increased intensity treatment via sculpting radiation to sites with high disease burden or high risk for disease involvement, while sparing normal tissue. We conducted a phase I trial in 51 patients (age range, 16 to 57 years) with relapsed/refractory acute leukemia undergoing HSCT (matched related, matched unrelated, or 1-allele mismatched unrelated) with active disease, combining escalating doses of TMLI (range, 1200 to 2000 cGy) with cyclophosphamide (CY) and etoposide (VP16). The maximum tolerated dose was declared at 2000 cGy, as TMLI simulation studies indicated that >2000 cGy might deliver doses toxic for normal organs at or exceeding those delivered by standard TBI. The post-transplantation nonrelapse mortality (NRM) rate was only 3.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], .7 to 12.0) at day +100 and 8.1% (95% CI, 2.5 to 18.0) at 1 year. The cumulative incidence of grades II to IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was 43.1% (95% CI, 29.2 to 56.3) and for grade III and IV, it was 13.7% (95% CI, 6.9 to 27.3). The day +30 complete remission rate for all patients was 88% and was 100% for those treated at 2000 cGy. The overall 1-year survival was 55.5% (95% CI, 40.7 to 68.1). The TMLI/CY/VP16 conditioning regimen is well tolerated at TMLI doses up to 2000 cGy with a low 100-day and 1-year NRM rate and no increased risk of GVHD with higher doses of radiation.

Transformation from indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) to diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) has historically been associated with a poor prognosis. A small series of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) studies using conventional conditioning regimens has demonstrated durable progression-free survival (PFS) rates ranging from 25% to 47%, but data in the rituximab era are lacking. Here we report the results of a multicenter retrospective trial evaluating ASCT in patients with transformed lymphoma using the Z-BEAM conditioning regimen, which combines yttrium-90–labeled ibritumomab tiuxetan (Zevalin) with high-dose BEAM (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan) chemotherapy. Sixty-three patients from 4 institutions were treated between 2003 and 2011. Histological confirmation of transformation was required and defined as a diagnosis of DLBCL in patients with either a prior history or concomitant diagnosis of low-grade B cell NHL. Median patient age at ASCT was 59.5 years, median number of prior regimens was 2, and all patients were exposed to rituximab. Disease status at ASCT was as follows: first complete remission (CR) (n = 30), first partial remission (n = 11), first relapse (n = 14), and at least second CR (n = 8). The median time from diagnosis of histological transformation to ASCT was 7.5 months (range, 2.8 to 116). Two-year nonrelapse mortality was 0%. Median follow-up for living patients was 28 months (range, 5 to 103). Two-year PFS was 68% (95% confidence interval, 58% to 75%), and overall survival was 90% (95% confidence interval, 80% to 95%). In conclusion, the Z-BEAM conditioning regimen for ASCT is well tolerated by patients with transformed lymphoma and demonstrates encouraging clinical outcomes.

We previously reported that brentuximab vedotin (BV) enabled successful reduced-intensity allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (RIC-alloHCT) in patients with relapsed Hodgkin lymphoma, after a median follow-up of 14.4 months. We now provide an updated report on 21 patients who were treated from 2009 to 2012 with BV before RIC-alloHCT with a uniform fludarabine/melphalan conditioning regimen and donor source after a median follow-up of 29.9 months. We have also retrospectively compared the patient characteristics and outcomes of these BV-pretreated patients to 23 patients who received fludarabine/melphalan RIC-alloHCT without prior BV, in the time period before the drug was available (2003 to 2009). Patients who were treated with BV before RIC-alloHCT had a lower median hematopoietic cell transplantation–specific comorbidity index and a reduced number of peri-transplantation toxicities. There were also improvements in 2-year progression-free survival (59.3% versus 26.1%) and cumulative incidence of relapse/progression (23.8% versus 56.5%).

Background: Mature T cell and NK cell neoplasms collectively known as peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) comprise 15-20% of Non-Hodgkin lymphomas in adults and have a poor prognosis with a 5-year survival of less than 30% for the most aggressive subtypes. Allogeneic HCT (allo-HCT) is offered to eligible patients as a potentially curative modality in the salvage setting or in high risk patients to consolidate an initial response to frontline therapy. There are few studies that report clinical outcomes derived from large sample size and long-term follow up data. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 87 consecutive patients with PTCL including transformed mycosis fungoides and NK/T-cell lymphoma without prior autologous transplant who underwent allo-HCT at City of Hope from January 2000 to June 2018 after IRB approval was obtained. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize baseline patient demographic, treatment, and disease characteristics. Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test were used to evaluate the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Cumulative incidences of time to relapse and time to non-relapse mortality (NRM) were calculated with relapse and NRM as competing risks. Cumulative incidences of acute and chronic GVHD were calculated as time to onset of GVHD with relapse and death as competing events for GVHD. Results: 87 patients were included for the analysis. Median age at the time of allo-HCT was 49 years (range 2-70 years). Histologies were PTCL-NOS (n=21); transformed CTCL (n=19); NK T-cell lymphoma (n=17); AITL (n=15), ALCL (n=7); gamma delta T-cell lymphoma (n=6) and other rare subtypes (n=2). None of the patients had a prior auto transplant. 42 patients (48%) received myeloablative conditioning, with the majority of patients receiving FTBI based conditioning (n=39) and three patients received BEAM regimen for conditioning. 45 patients (52%) received reduced intensity conditioning; fludarabine/melphalan based-conditioning was the most common regimen used (n=39). Sibling HCT was performed in 47 patients (54%), while MUD HCT was performed in 36 patients (41%) with fully matched HLA unrelated donor in 15 (17%) and HLA mismatched in 21 (24%) patients; 4 (5%) received haploidentical HCT. GVHD prophylaxis consisted of tacrolimus/sirolimus (n=54), tacrolimus/sirolimus/MTX (n=11), tacrolimus or cyclosporine/MTX (n=7), tacrolimus or cyclosporine/MMF (n=7), post-transplant cyclophosphamide/tacrolimus/MMF (n=5) and other (n=3). Source of stem cells was PBSC in 77 (88%), bone marrow in 5 (6%), and cord blood in 5 (6%) patients. At the time of allo-HCT, there were a total of 25 (29%) patients in complete remission (CR1 n=15, CR2+ n=10), 25 (29%) patients in partial remission 22 (25%) with induction failure and 14 (16%) with relapsed disease. The median follow-up among survivors was 6.9 years (range 1.1-15.5). The 5- and 10-year PFS was 47% (95% CI: 36%-58%) and 38% (95% CI: 26%-50%), respectively. The 5- and 10-year OS was 53% (95% CI: 41%-63%) and 42% (95% CI: 29%-54%), respectively (Fig.1). Relapses at 5 and 10 years were both 24% (95% CI: 16%-34%), while NRM at 5 and 10 years was 28% (95% CI: 19%-39%) and 37% (95% CI: 25%-50%), respectively. At day 100 after allo-HCT, the rates of acute GVHD grade II-IV were 41% (95% CI: 30%-51%) and grade III-IV of 16% (95%CI: 9%-25%). Chronic GVHD rates at 3 years were 62% (95% CI: 51%-72%), with extensive GVHD of 55% (95% CI: 44%-65%). On univariate analysis, age (> 60 or not), sex, TBI-based conditioning, donor type (MSD vs MUD), stem cell source or remission status prior to allo-HCT did not predict for overall survival in our study. Conclusions: Our results constitute the largest reported single-institution series with a long-term follow-up on allo-HCT outcomes in patients with aggressive T-cell NHL. The 5-year PFS and OS of 47 and 53%, respectively, are encouraging for the high-risk T-cell NHL patients with limited treatment options. Disclosures Salhotra: Celgene: Other: Research Support; Kadmon Corporation: Other: Non paid consultant. Popplewell:City of Hope: Employment. Herrera:Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Immune Design: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding. Mei:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Zain:spectrum: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.

Background: T-lymphoblastic lymphoma (T-LBL) is a highly aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma seen in young adults that usually presents with a mediastinal mass and less than 20% bone marrow involvement with neoplastic cells. T-LBL and T-cell ALL are morphologically and immmunophenoytpically similar and are thus frequently grouped together. However there are differences in clinical presentation, cytogenetic features and molecular pathogenesis indicating biologic differences. Patients with relapsed refractory T-LBL have poor prognosis and there is a paucity of data on allogeneic HCT (allo-HCT) outcomes in this setting. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 25 consecutive patients with T lymphoblastic lymphoma without prior auto-HCT who underwent allo-HCT at City of Hope from January 2000 to June 2018 after IRB approval was obtained. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize baseline patient demographic, treatment, and disease characteristics. Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test were used to evaluate the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Cumulative incidences of time to relapse and time to non-relapse mortality (NRM) were calculated with relapse and NRM as competing risks. Cumulative incidences of acute and chronic GVHD were calculated as time to onset of GVHD with relapse and death as competing events for GVHD. Results: 25 patients were included for the analysis. Median age at the time of allo-HCT was 25 years (range 7-70 years). 21 patients (80%) received myeloablative conditioning: FTBI containing regimens (n=20) with FTBI/VP-16 being most commonly used(n=16) and one patient received Bu/Cy based conditioning; 4 patients received reduced intensity conditioning with Flu/Mel. Sibling HCT was performed in 12 patients (48%), while MUD HCT was performed in 13 patients (52%) with fully matched HLA unrelated donor in 9 (36%) and HLA mismatched in 4 (16%) patients. GVHD prophylaxis consisted of tacrolimus/sirolimus (n=10), tacrolimus or cyclosporine/MTX (n=7), tacrolimus/sirolimus/MTX (n=4) and others (n=4) Source of stem cells was PBSC in 19 (76%), bone marrow in 5 (20%), and cord blood in 1 (4%) patients. At the time of allo-HCT, there were a total of 11 (44%) patients in complete remission (CR1 n=4, CR2+ n=7), 9 (36%) patients in partial remission and unknown remission status (n=5). The median follow-up among survivors was 8.9 years (range 2.3-12.1). The 5- and 10-year PFS was 31% (95% CI: 14%-50%). The 5- and 10-year OS was 31% (95% CI: 14%-49%) (Fig.1). Cumulative incidence of relapses at 5 and 10 years were both 36% (95% CI: 18%-55%) while NRM at 5 and 10 years was 33% (95% CI: 15%-52%). At day 100 after allo-HCT, the rates of acute GVHD grade II-IV were 63% (95% CI: 39%-79%) and grade III-IV of 25% (95%CI: 10%-44%). Chronic GVHD rates at 3 years were 60% (95% CI: 37%-77%). In univariate analysis, preHCT remission status did not improve PFS on long term follow up. Conclusions: Our results in patients with T-LBL shows 5-year PFS and OS of 31%, respectively, indicating that a subset of patients can be cured with allo-HCT in the high-risk setting. Disclosures Salhotra: Celgene: Other: Research Support; Kadmon Corporation: Other: Non paid consultant. Popplewell:City of Hope: Employment. Herrera:Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Immune Design: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Mei:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Aldoss:AUTO1: Consultancy; Helocyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel/accommodation/expenses; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Other: travel/accommodation/expenses, Speakers Bureau; Agios: Consultancy, Honoraria. Zain:Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; spectrum: Honoraria.

Introduction: Nivolumab (nivo) is an anti-PD-1 antibody that restores effective anti-tumor immune responses and is tolerable and effective in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (RR) Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Nivo combined with brentuximab vedotin (BV) as first salvage therapy (tx) yields high response rates and favorable progression-free survival (PFS) as a bridge to autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in pts with RR HL. With the frontline approval of BV, it is necessary to evaluate the role of nivo as salvage tx separate from BV. We report interim results of a phase 2 trial evaluating PET-adapted nivo or nivo + ICE (NICE) chemotherapy as first salvage tx in RR HL. Methods: In this prospective, multicenter trial, pts with biopsy-proven RR HL after frontline tx received 3 mg/kg nivo every 2 weeks for up to 6 cycles (C). PET-CT was performed after C3 and C6. After C6, pts in CR proceeded to ASCT while pts not in CR received NICE for 2 cycles. The primary endpoint was complete response rate according to 2014 Lugano classification. PFS and overall survival (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan Meier method. Results: 39 pts were evaluable for toxicity; 37 were evaluable for response. Baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1. 32 pts received nivo alone and 7 pts received nivo/NICE. 32 pts completed study tx, 2 pts continue on protocol tx, 1 pt discontinued early in CR to undergo ASCT, 2 pts discontinued nivo early due to nivo-related adverse events (AE, 1 pt = Gr 4 altered mental status, 1 pt = Gr 2 pneumonitis), 1 pt discontinued due to unrelated death during nivo (Gr 5 sepsis due to untreated dental abscess), 1 pt withdrew due to refusal to receive NICE following nivo. After C3 of nivo, the overall response rate (ORR) was 89% (33/37), with a CR rate of 59% (22/37), partial response (PR) rate of 30% (11/37), and 2 pts each had stable disease (SD) and PD. After C6 of nivo (n=31), the ORR was 90%, with 24 CR (77%), 4 PR (13%), and 3 PD. Thus, including pts who stopped nivo early (due to toxicity or insufficient response and switch to NICE), at the end of nivo (n=37, not including 2 pts with ongoing tx) the ORR was 78%, with 26 CR (70%), 3 PR (8%), 1 pt with SD and 5 with PD. 7 pts were treated with NICE and all responded (100% ORR) with 6 CR (86%) and 1 PR (14%). At the end of protocol tx (nivo or nivo/NICE) including all pts (n=37) except the 2 who remain on ongoing tx, the ORR was 89% with 32 CR (86%) and 1 PR (3%). Among 35 evaluable pts, the ORR was 94% and CR rate was 91% (Figure). 27 pts proceeded to ASCT directly after protocol tx, 1 pt is awaiting ASCT, and 4 pts in CR refused ASCT. One pt with PR after NICE responded to subsequent salvage tx and underwent ASCT. In pts who had ASCT, a median of 2 (range 1-4) stem cell collections were required, a median of 4.7x106 CD34+ cells/kg (range 3.12 - 16.23) were collected, and the median time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment were 11 and 12 days, respectively. The median follow-up time in all pts (n=39) was 10.5 months (range 1.6-24.5 mo). The 1-year PFS was 79% (95 CI, 63-98%) and 1-year OS was 97% (95 CI, 92-100%). Two PD events occurred in pts who had CR but refused ASCT. There were 2 PD events in pts who completed therapy and proceeded to ASCT - both were in pts who required NICE. The most common AEs related to nivo alone (n=39) were fatigue (28%), rash (18%), fever (15%), thrombocytopenia (10%), and dyspnea (10%), and all were grade (gr) 1-2. Only 2 pts had gr 3-4 nivo-related AE, 1 pt had gr 3 thrombocytopenia and another pt had gr 4 altered mental status and gr 3 tumor lysis syndrome. Among 7 pts who received NICE, the most common AEs were nausea (71%), vomiting (57%), anemia (43%), fatigue (43%), hypertension (43%), and hyponatremia (29%) - all were gr 1-2. The only Gr 3-4 NICE-related AE was gr 4 neutropenia in 1 pt. Conclusion: PET-adapted nivo followed by NICE in patients without CR is a well-tolerated and effective first salvage approach in pts with RR HL. In our cohort, nivo alone was an effective bridge to ASCT in a majority of pts, sparing them the toxicity of traditional salvage chemotherapy. Pts who did not achieve CR with nivo were effectively salvaged by NIVO+ICE Disclosures Herrera: Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Immune Design: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding. Chen:Autolus Therapeutics: Employment. Palmer:Gilead Sciences: Consultancy. Mei:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Popplewell:City of Hope: Employment. Kwak:Pepromene Bio: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Research Funding; InnoLifes: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; Xeme BioPharma, Inc: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; Enzychem LifeSciences: Consultancy; Celltrion, Inc.: Consultancy; Celltrion Healthcare: Consultancy. Lee:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding.

Extramedullary relapse following allogeneic hematopoietic transplant (alloHCT) for acute leukemia was first highlighted as a problem by a survey of European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantati...

We conducted a matched-cohort analysis of autologous transplant conditioning regimens for diffuse large cell lymphoma in 92 patients treated with either radioimmunotherapy (RIT) or total body irradiation (TBI)–based conditioning regimens. The RIT regimen consisted of 0.4 mCi/kg of 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan plus BEAM (BCNU, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan). The TBI-based regimen combined fractionated TBI at 1200 cGy, with etoposide and cyclophosphamide. Five factors were matched between 46 patient pairs: age at transplant ±5 years, disease status at salvage, number of prior regimens, year of diagnosis ±5 years, and year of transplantation ±5 years. Patients in the TBI group had higher rates of cardiac toxicity and mucositis, whereas Z-BEAM patients had a higher incidence of pulmonary toxicity. Overall survival at 4 years was 81.0% for the Z-BEAM and 52.7% for the TBI group (P = .01). The 4-year cumulative incidence of relapse/progression was 40.4% and 42.1% for Z-BEAM and TBI, respectively (P = .63). Nonrelapse mortality was superior in the Z-BEAM group: 0% compared with 15.8% for TBI at 4 years (P < .01). Our data demonstrate that RIT-based conditioning had a similar relapse incidence to TBI, with lower toxicity, resulting in improved overall survival, particularly in patients with ≥2 prior regimens.

Randomized trials comparing autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) to conventional chemotherapy have demonstrated superior survival among HIV-negative ASCT patients with relapsed non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Recent trials explored the feasibility of ASCT in the HIV setting. Although these studies have shown that ASCT in HIV-positive NHL patients (HIVpos-NHL) is well tolerated, the impact of HIV infection on long-term transplant outcome is not well characterized. Ongoing comparison of long-term survival following ASCT in HIVpos-NHL patients and HIVneg-NHL patients will allow investigators to explore whether there should be inclusion of HIVpos-NHL patients in ASCT trials. To study long-term outcome we conducted a single-institution matched case-controlled study in HIVpos-NHL patients (cases) and HIVneg-NHL patients (controls). Twenty-nine patients with HIVpos-NHL were matched with HIVneg-NHL controls on sex, time to ASCT, year of transplant, histology, age, disease status, number prior regimens, and conditioning regimen. Nonrelapse mortality (NRM) was similar: 11% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4%-28%) in HIVpos-NHL patients and 4% (95% CI: 1%-25%) in HIVneg-NHL controls (P = .18). Two-year disease-free survival (DFS) for the HIVpos-NHL patients was 76% (95% CI: 62%-85%) and 56% (95% CI: 45%-66%) for the HIVneg-NHL controls (P = .33). Overall survival was also similar; the 2-year point estimates were 75% (95% CI: 61%-85%) and 75% (95% CI: 60%-85%), respectively (P = .93), despite inclusion of more poor risk HIVpos-NHL patients. These results provide further evidence that HIV status does not affect the long-term outcome of ASCT for NHL, and therefore HIV status alone should no longer exclude these patients from transplant clinical trials.