Search

// Marianna Gallo 1 , Daniela Frezzetti 1 , Cristin Roma 1 , Nicoletta Chicchinelli 1 , Antonio Barbieri 2 , Claudio Arra 2 , Giosue Scognamiglio 3 , Gerardo Botti 3 , Antonella De Luca 1 and Nicola Normanno 1 1 Cell Biology and Biotherapy Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-“Fondazione G. Pascale”, Naples, Italy 2 Animal Facility, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-“Fondazione G. Pascale”, Naples, Italy 3 Surgical Pathology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-“Fondazione G. Pascale”, Naples, Italy Correspondence to: Antonella De Luca, email: a.deluca@istitutotumori.na.it ; antoneldel@hotmail.com Keywords: breast cancer; RANTES/CCL5; IL6; metastasis; tumor microenvironment Received: July 20, 2017 Accepted: February 26, 2018 Published: April 03, 2018 ABSTRACT Both the CC chemokine ligand 5 (CCL5/RANTES) and interleukin-6 (IL-6), released by mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) as well as by neoplastic cells, promote breast cancer cell progression through autocrine and paracrine mechanisms. In order to assess the effects of the simultaneous overexpression of RANTES and IL-6 on the tumor cell phenotype, we overexpressed both proteins in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cell lines. MCF-7 cells co-expressing RANTES and IL-6 had a greater ability to form colonies in soft agar, compared to cells overexpressing RANTES or IL-6. In addition, both MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 clones co-expressing RANTES and IL-6 showed a significantly higher ability to migrate and to invade. The analysis of phosphorylated ERK1/2, AKT and STAT3 signal transduction proteins revealed that several signaling pathways are simultaneously activated in cells overexpressing both factors. Finally, the overexpression of RANTES and IL-6 in MCF-7 cells significantly increased the in vivo tumor growth. Collectively, our data suggest that the simultaneous expression of IL-6 and RANTES produces a more aggressive phenotype in breast cancer cells and provide evidence that IL-6 and RANTES might represent potential targets for novel therapeutic strategies aimed to block the tumor-stroma interaction.

Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is an heterogeneous disease in which different genetic alterations play a role in its pathogenesis and progression and offer potential for therapeutic intervention. The research on predictive biomarkers in metastatic CRC (mCRC) mainly focused on the identification of biomarkers of response or resistance to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibodies. In this respect, international guidelines suggest testing mCRC patients only for KRAS, NRAS and BRAF mutations and for microsatellite instability. However, the use of novel testing methods is raising relevant issue related to these biomarkers, such as the presence of sub-clonal RAS mutations or the clinical interpretation of rare no-V600 BRAF variants. In addition, a number of novel biomarkers is emerging from recent studies including amplification of ERBB2, mutations in ERBB2, MAP2K1 and NF1 and rearrangements of ALK, ROS1, NTRK and RET. Mutations in POLE and the levels of tumor mutation burden also appear as possible biomarkers of response to immunotherapy in CRC. Finally, the consensus molecular subtypes classification of CRC based on gene expression profiling has prognostic and predictive implications. Integration of all these information will be likely necessary in the next future in order to improve precision/personalized medicine in mCRC patients.

Introduction/Background To test the Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer (ProMisE) and determine the frequency of specific/prognostic molecular alterations within a cohort of endometrial cancer (EC) women conservatively treated by combined resectoscopy and progestin therapy. Methodology We used blocks of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue from the primary tumors of patients enrolled into the ECCo trial (EudraCT 2010-018581-23) between 2007 and 2016. In order to assign EC resectoscopic specimens to one of four ProMisE subgroups, testing involved sequential assessment of i) immunohistochemistry (IHC) for mismatch repair (MMR) proteins MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2; ii) sequencing for POLE/POLD1 exonuclease domain mutations (EDMs); iii) p53 IHC. Results Molecular analysis methods were used in 25 patients (stage IA, G1-2 endometrioid EC), of whom 15 (60%) represented fully evaluable cases. Seven cases (46.7%) had abnormal MMR IHC, POLE/POLD1 EDMs were found in 3 cases (20%), and abnormal p53 IHC in 1 case (6.6%). Three patients (20%) had more than one molecular feature. Among 10 (40%) 9unclassifiable9 patients, six failures in achieving complete molecular categorization were due to the low tumor volume. Molecular classification of the 15 fully evaluable cases yielded the following ProMisE subtypes: 7 (46.7%) MMR IHC abnormal, 1 (6.6%) POLE EDM, 0 (0%) p53 IHC abnormal, 7 (46.7%) p53 IHC wild-type. Conclusion Although larger series are needed to further assess the feasibility of a molecular categorization in a fertility-sparing setting, data presented are promising. In women with early stage low-volume disease, resectoscopy could be advantageous to provide samples allowing complete genetic risk assessment. Disclosure Nothing to disclose

Objective To test the Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer (ProMisE) and determine the frequency of specific/prognostic molecular alterations within a cohort of endometrial cancer (EC) women conservatively treated by combined hysteroscopic resection and progestin therapy. Study design We used blocks of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue from the primary tumors of patients enrolled into the ECCo trial (EudraCT 2010-018581-23) between 2007 and 2016. In order to assign EC resectoscopic specimens to one of four ProMisE subgroups, testing involved sequential assessment of i) immunohistochemistry (IHC) for mismatch repair (MMR) proteins MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2; ii) sequencing for POLE/POLD1 exonuclease domain mutations (EDMs); iii) p53 IHC. Results Molecular analysis methods were used in 25 patients (stage IA, G1-2 endometrioid EC), of whom 15 (60%) represented fully evaluable cases. Seven cases (46.7%) had abnormal MMR IHC, POLE/POLD1 EDMs were found in 3 cases (20%), and abnormal p53 IHC in 1 case (6.6%). Three patients (20%) had more than one molecular feature. Among 10 (40%) ‘unclassifiable’ patients, six failures in achieving complete molecular categorization were due to the low tumor volume. Molecular classification of the 15 fully evaluable cases yielded the following ProMisE subtypes: 7 (46.7%) MMR IHC abnormal, 1 (6.6%) POLE EDM, 0 (0%) p53 IHC abnormal, 7 (46.7%) p53 IHC wild-type. Conclusions Although larger series are needed to further assess the feasibility of a molecular categorization in a fertility-sparing setting, data presented are promising. In women with early stage low-volume disease, operative hysteroscopy could be advantageous to provide samples allowing complete genetic risk assessment.

Therapeutic decisions in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are guided by the presence of actionable mutations in EGFR, ALK, or ROS1 genes. The gold standard test for mutational analysis is the tissue biopsy or a cytology specimen, but in approximately 30% of patients, these samples are not available. In these cases, circulating free tumor-derived DNA (ctDNA) and circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are minimally invasive and cost-effective methods for molecular diagnosis, useful to obtain information on the molecular landscape of NSCLC, to depict tumor heterogeneity, and to monitor tumors in real time. While ctDNA has been introduced in clinical practice when tumor tissue is not available, the clinical use of CTCs seems more complex. However, the technologies for the study of liquid biopsy are rapidly evolving and will further increase the ability to evaluate tumor heterogeneity, allowing the design of novel therapeutic strategies to prevent resistance to targeted agents.

Introduction The vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF) is the main mediator of angiogenesis. In addition, VEGF contributes to cancer growth and metastasis directly targeting tumor cells. VEGF overexpression and/or high VEGF serum levels have been reported in lung cancer. Areas covered We searched Pubmed for relevant preclinical studies with the terms 'lung cancer' 'VEGF' and 'in vivo'. We also searched the Clinicaltrials.gov database, the FDA and the EMA websites for the most recent updates on clinical development of anti-VEGF agents. Expert opinion VEGF plays an important role in sustaining the development and progression of lung cancer and it might represent an attractive target for therapeutic strategies. Nevertheless, clinical trials failed to attend the promising expectations deriving from preclinical studies with anti-VEGF agents. To improve the efficacy of anti-VEGF therapies in lung cancer, potential strategies might be the employment of combinatory therapies with immune checkpoint inhibitors or agents that inhibit signaling pathways and proangiogenic factors activated in response to VEGF blockade, and the identification of novel targets in the VEGF cascade. Finally, the identification of predictive markers might help to select patients who are more likely to respond to anti-angiogenic drugs.

Several different studies have addressed the role of the circulating tumor cells (CTC) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In particular, the potential of CTC analysis in the early diagnosis of NSCLC and in the prediction of the outcome of patients with early and advanced NSCLC have been explored. A major limit of these studies is that they used different techniques for CTC isolation and enumeration, they employed different thresholds to discriminate between high- and low-risk patients, and they enrolled heterogeneous and often small cohort of patients. Nevertheless, the results of many studies are concordant in indicating a correlation between high CTC count and poor prognosis in both early and advanced NSCLC. The reduction of CTC number following treatment might also represent an important indicator of sensitivity to therapy in patients with metastatic disease. Preliminary data also suggest the potential for CTC analysis in the early diagnosis of NSCLC in high-risk individuals. However, these findings need to be confirmed in large prospective trials in order to be transferred to the clinical practice. The molecular profiling of single CTC in NSCLC might provide important information on tumor biology and on the mechanisms involved in tumor dissemination and in acquired resistance to targeted therapies. In this respect, xenografts derived from CTC might represent a valuable tool to investigate these phenomena and to develop novel therapeutic strategies.

Background The role of tumour mutation burden (TMB) as predictive biomarker of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is being explored in colorectal cancer (CRC). Microsatellite instability status (MSI) is currently used to identify CRC patients who may benefit from ICI. However, TMB values vary significantly among MSI CRC. In addition, selected microsatellite stable (MSS) with high TMB might also benefit treatment with ICI. Methods TMB evaluation was performed with the Oncomine Tumor Mutation Load Assay (OTML, Thermofisher) on the Ion S5XL platform. Data analysis was carried out using Ion Reporter Software v5.10. TMB was calculated as the total number of non-synonymous somatic single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and indels divided by number of bases sequenced. MSI status was analysed by means of the Idylla MSI assay (Biocartis), which evaluates the presence of mutations in 7 novel MSI loci. Results TMB analysis was performed on 106 formalin-fixed paraffin embedded CRC samples and the data were compared with the MSI results. The Idylla assay classified 68 samples as MSS and 38 samples as microsatellite instable (MSI-H). The TMB values ranged from zero to 21.22 (median: 5.005) in the MSS and from 13.42 to 204.8 in the MSI-H group (median: 25.66), with a significant difference in median values (P Conclusions The TMB values assessed with the OTML assay strongly correlated with MSI status in CRC. However, significant heterogeneity in TMB levels were detected among both MSI and MSS tumors, suggesting that TMB testing might provide additional information on sensitivity to ICI in CRC. The correlations with driver gene alterations might help in selecting tumors to be tested for TMB. Legal entity responsible for the study The authors. Funding Has not received any funding. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Introduction In colorectal cancer (CRC), the use of immunotherapy is currently based on the evaluation of microsatellite instability (MSI) for the identification of patients who may benefit from this treatment. Recently, tumour mutation burden (TMB) has been evaluated as a useful biomarker to predict response to immune checkpoint (IO) therapy. TMB can be measured by means of targeted next generation sequencing with panels covering approximately 1 Mb of the human genome. We performed TMB analysis on tumor cell lines and CRC samples and compared the results with MSI status to explore the relationship between these two biomarkers. Materials and methods MSI status was evaluated by means of routine immunohistochemistry (IHC), the Idylla MSI assay (Biocartis) and with fluorescence capillary electrophoresis-based DNA fragment size analysis of a T17 mononucleotide sequences within intron 8 of heat shock protein 110 kDa HSP110 (17 polythymine, T17). TMB evaluation was performed with the Oncomine Tumor Mutation Load Assay (Thermofisher) on the Ion S5XL platform. Data analysis was carried out using Ion Reporter Software v5.6. TMB was calculated as the total number of somatic single nucleotide variants (SNVs) divided by number of bases with sufficient coverage. Results We first evaluated the TMB in 13 tumor cell lines and correlated the results with massively parallel sequencing data from >1600 genes for the same cell lines available on cBioPortal, demonstrating an high correlation between the Oncomine Tumor Mutation Load Assay and the TMB value obtained by wide genetic profiling (R² = 0.976). We next analyzed a cohort of 23 MMR deficient (MMR-D) and 32 MMR-proficient (MMR-P) formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) CRC, as classified by IHC. The MMR data were compared to TMB and revealed TMB values not in line with the expected results, since some samples in the MMR-D group had low TMB values (TMB range: 5.5-134.4). We re-evaluated the 23 MMR-D samples by means of the Idylla System. The Idylla MSI assay re-classified 7 samples as microsatellite stable (MSS) and categorized the remaining 16 samples as MSI-High (MSI-H). The results were confirmed by the T17 analysis. In the MSS group (n. 39), the mean and median TMB value were 11.48 and 10.39, with TMB ranging from 4.88 to 33.29. The mean and median TMB for the MSI-H group (n. 16) were 43.89 and 38.63, and the TMB values ranged from 19.63 to 134.4. While the medians of the two groups were significantly different (Mann-Whitney test P Conclusions These data suggest that routine IHC methods for MSI evaluation can lead to a wrong classification of CRC. On the other hand, TMB assessment might better identify patients who may benefit from IOs within both the MSI-H and the MSS subgroups. Citation Format: Francesca Fenizia, Raffaella Pasquale, Cristin Roma, Francesca Bergantino, Anna Maria Rachiglio, Nicoletta Chicchinelli, Paolo Graziano, Gerardo Botti, Fabiana Tatangelo, Giosuè Scognamiglio, Christopher Allen, Matilde Lambiase, Alessia Iannaccone, Nicola Normanno. Tumor mutation burden and microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 3975.

In the cetuximab after progression in KRAS wild-type colorectal cancer patients (CAPRI) trial patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) received 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) and cetuximab in first line followed by 5-Fluorouracil, folinic acid, oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) with or without cetuximab until progression. Limited data are available on the efficacy and safety of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) agents on elderly patients with mCRC. In the current study we evaluated the efficacy and safety of FOLFIRI plus cetuximab in age-defined subgroups. Background: In the cetuximab after progression in KRAS wild-type colorectal cancer patients ( CAPRI) trial patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) received 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) and cetuximab in first line followed by 5-Fluorouracil, folinic acid, oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) with or without cetuximab until progression. Limited data are available on the efficacy and safety of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) agents on elderly patients with mCRC. In the current study we evaluated the efficacy and safety of FOLFIRI plus cetuximab in age-defined subgroups.Methods: A post-hoc analysis was performed in CAPRI trial patients; outcomes (progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), safety) were analysed by agegroups and stratified according to molecular characterisation. 3 age cut-offs were used to define the elderly population (>= 65; >= 70 and >= 75 years).Results: 340 patients with mCRC were treated in first line with FOLFIRI plus cetuximab. Among those, 154 patients were > 65 years, 86 > 70 years and 35 > 75 years. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed in 182 patients. Among them, 87 patients were > 65 years, 46 > 70 and 17 > 75. 104 of 182 patients were wild type (WT) for KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA genes. In the quadruple WT group, 51 patients were >= 65 years; 29 were >= 70; 9 were >= 75. Median PFS was similar within the age-subgroups in the intention-to-treat population, NGS cohort and quadruple WT patients, respectively. Likewise, ORR was not significantly different among age-subgroups in the 3 populations. Safety profile was acceptable and similarly reported among all age-groups, with the exception of grade >= 3 diarrhoea (55% vs 25%, p=0.04) and neutropaenia (75% vs 37%, p=0.03) in patients >= 75 years and grade >= 3 fatigue (31% vs 20%, p=0.01) in patients < 75 years.Conclusions: Tolerability of cetuximab plus FOLFIRI was acceptable in elderly patients. Similar ORR and PFS were observed according to age-groups. No differences in adverse events were reported among the defined subgroups with the exception of higher incidence of grade >= 3 diarrhoea and neutropaenia in patients >= 75 years and grade >= 3 fatigue in patients < 75 years.

The presence of activating mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is predictive of response to first- and second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, patients that initially respond to these drugs inexorably become resistant. The T790M mutation in the exon 20 of the EGFR is the main mechanism of resistance to EGFR TKIs occurring in over 50% of the cases. Third generation EGFR TKIs have been shown to be active in patients who progressed after TKI treatment and carry the T790M mutation. Areas covered: This review is focused on the implications of tumor heterogeneity for targeting the T790M in patients with NSCLC. Expert opinion: Pre-clinical and clinical data suggest that the T790M is heterogeneously expressed in tumors that become resistant to first- and second-generation EGFR TKIs. These findings have important implications for the molecular diagnostic of the T790M mutation. Indeed, the analysis of both the circulating free tumor DNA (ctDNA) isolated from plasma and the tumor tissue might provide complimentary information to identify patients carrying the T790M mutation. However, further studies are needed to better understand the influence of tumor heterogeneity on the activity of drugs targeting the T790M.

Background Cetuximab plus chemotherapy is a first-line treatment option in metastatic KRAS and NRAS wild-type colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. No data are currently available on continuing anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy beyond progression. Patients and methods We did this open-label, 1:1 randomized phase II trial at 25 hospitals in Italy to evaluate the efficacy of cetuximab plus 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) as second-line treatment of KRAS exon 2 wild-type metastatic CRC patients treated in first line with 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) plus cetuximab. Patients received FOLFOX plus cetuximab (arm A) or FOLFOX (arm B). Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Tumour tissues were assessed by next-generation sequencing (NGS). This report is the final analysis. Results Between 1 February 2010 and 28 September 2014, 153 patients were randomized (74 in arm A and 79 in arm B). Median PFS was 6.4 [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.7–8.0] versus 4.5 months (95% CI 3.3–5.7); [hazard ratio (HR), 0.81; 95% CI 0.58–1.12; P = 0.19], respectively. NGS was performed in 117/153 (76.5%) cases; 66/117 patients (34 in arm A and 32 in arm B) had KRAS, NRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA wild-type tumours. For these patients, PFS was longer in the FOLFOX plus cetuximab arm [median 6.9 (95% CI 5.5–8.2) versus 5.3 months (95% CI 3.7–6.9); HR, 0.56 (95% CI 0.33–0.94); P = 0.025]. There was a trend in better overall survival: median 23.7 [(95% CI 19.4–28.0) versus 19.8 months (95% CI 14.9–24.7); HR, 0.57 (95% CI 0.32–1.02); P = 0.056]. Conclusions Continuing cetuximab treatment in combination with chemotherapy is of potential therapeutic efficacy in molecularly selected patients and should be validated in randomized phase III trials.

Background: Evidence suggests that metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC) has a high level of intratumor heterogeneity. We carried out a quantitative assessment of tumor heterogeneity for KRAS, NRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA mutations, in order to assess potential clinical implications. Patients and methods: Tumor samples (n = 182) from the CAPRI-GOIM trial of first-line cetuximab + FOLFIRI in KRAS exon-2 wild-type mCRC patients were assessed by next-generation sequencing that allows quantitative assessment of mutant genes. Mutant allelic frequency was normalized for the neoplastic cell content and, assuming that somatic mutations usually affect one allele, the Heterogeneity Score (HS) was calculated by multiplying by 2 the frequency of mutant alleles in neoplastic cells. Therefore, HS virtually corresponds to the fraction of neoplastic cells carrying a specific mutation. Results: The KRAS HS ranged between 12 and 260 with mean value of 87.1 and median value of 84.4, suggesting that in most CRC, the majority of neoplastic cells carry mutant KRAS. Similar findings were observed for NRAS (HS range 35.5-146.7; mean 102.8; median 117.1). In contrast, in BRAF (HS range 17.1-120; mean 54.8; median 54.3) and PIK3CA (HS range 14.3-120; mean 59.5; median 47.3) mutant cases, only a fraction of neoplastic cells seem to carry the mutant allele. The response rate was 70% in KRAS mutant patients with an HS 33 patients (high KRAS; n = 35); median progression-free survival were 7.97 and 8.37 months, respectively. Low-KRAS tumors had a higher frequency of additional mutations in PIK3CA when compared with high-KRAS (6/10 versus 8/35). Conclusions: KRAS and NRAS mutations are usually present in the majority of neoplastic cells, whereas BRAF and PIK3CA mutations often affect a limited fraction of transformed cells. Resistance to cetuximab in low-KRAS patients might be driven by the complex mutational profile rather than KRAS mutation load.

ABSTRACT The presence of EGFR mutations predicts the sensitivity to EGF receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors in a molecularly defined subset of non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patients. For this reason, EGFR testing of NSCLC is required to provide personalized treatment options and better outcomes for NSCLC patients. As surgery specimens are not available in the majority of NSCLC, other currently available DNA sources are small biopsies and cytological samples, providing however limited and low-quality material. In order to address this issue, the use of surrogate sources of DNA, such as blood, serum and plasma samples, which often contains circulating free tumor DNA or circulating tumor cells, is emerging as a new strategy for tumor genotyping.

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are predictive of response to treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Competitive Allele-Specific TaqMan PCR (castPCR) is a highly sensitive and specific technology. EGFR mutations were assessed by TaqMan Mutation Detection Assays (TMDA) based on castPCR technology in 64 tumor samples: a training set of 30 NSCLC and 6 colorectal carcinoma (CRC) samples and a validation set of 28 NSCLC cases. The sensitivity and specificity of this method were compared with routine diagnostic techniques including direct sequencing and the EGFR Therascreen RGQ kit. Analysis of the training set allowed the identification of the threshold value for data analysis (0.2); the maximum cycle threshold (Ct=37); and the cut-off ΔCt value (7) for the EGFR TMDA. By using these parameters, castPCR technology identified both training and validation set EGFR mutations with similar frequency as compared with the Therascreen kit. Sequencing detected rare mutations that are not identified by either castPCR or Therascreen, but in samples with low tumor cell content it failed to detect common mutations that were revealed by real-time PCR based methods. In conclusion, our data suggest that castPCR is highly sensitive and specific to detect EGFR mutations in NSCLC clinical samples.