Search

SUMMARYRecent structural studies show the Rad24-RFC loads the 9-1-1 checkpoint clamp onto a recessed 5′ end by binding the 5′ DNA on Rad24 at an external surface site and threading the 3′ ssDNA into the well-established internal chamber and into 9-1-1. We find here that Rad24-RFC loads 9-1-1 onto DNA gaps in preference to a recessed 5′ DNA end, thus presumably leaving 9-1-1 on a 3′ ss/ds DNA after Rad24-RFC ejects from the 5′ gap end and may explain reports of 9-1-1 directly functioning in DNA repair with various TLS polymerases, in addition to signaling the ATR kinase. To gain a deeper understanding of 9-1-1 loading at gaps we report high-resolution structures of Rad24-RFC during loading of 9-1-1 onto 10-nt and 5-nt gapped DNAs. At a 10-nt gap we captured five Rad24-RFC–9-1-1 loading intermediates in which the 9-1-1 DNA entry gate varies from fully open to fully closed around DNA using ATPγS, supporting the emerging view that ATP hydrolysis is not needed for clamp opening/closing, but instead for dissociation of the loader from the clamp encircling DNA. The structure of Rad24-RFC–9-1-1 at a 5-nt gap shows a 180° axially rotated 3′-dsDNA which orients the template strand to bridge the 3′- and 5′- junctions with a minimum 5-nt ssDNA. The structures reveal a unique loop on Rad24 that limits the length of dsDNA in the inner chamber, and inability to melt DNA ends unlike RFC, thereby explaining Rad24-RFC’s preference for a preexisting ssDNA gap and suggesting a direct role in gap repair in addition to its checkpoint role.

The 9-1-1 DNA checkpoint clamp is loaded onto 5′-recessed DNA to activate the DNA damage checkpoint that arrests the cell cycle. The 9-1-1 clamp is a heterotrimeric ring that is loaded in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by Rad24-RFC (hRAD17-RFC), an alternate clamp loader in which Rad24 replaces Rfc1 in the RFC1-5 clamp loader of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA). The 9-1-1 clamp loading mechanism has been a mystery, because, unlike RFC, which loads PCNA onto a 3′-recessed junction, Rad24-RFC loads the 9-1-1 ring onto a 5′-recessed DNA junction. Here we report two cryo-EM structures of Rad24-RFC–DNA with a closed or 27-Å open 9-1-1 clamp. The structures reveal a completely unexpected mechanism by which a clamp can be loaded onto DNA. Unlike RFC, which encircles DNA, Rad24 binds 5′-DNA on its surface, not inside the loader, and threads the 3′ ssDNA overhang into the 9-1-1 clamp from above the ring.

The replication machinery that synthesizes new copies of chromosomal DNA is located at the junction where double-stranded DNA is separated into its two strands. This replication fork DNA structure is at the heart of most assays involving DNA helicases. The helicase enzyme unwinds the replication fork structure into two single-stranded templates which are converted into two daughter duplexes by other proteins, including DNA polymerases. In eukaryotes, the CMG (Cdc45/Mcm2-7/GINS) helicase plays the pivotal role of unwinding the parental duplex DNA and at the same time interacts with numerous other proteins, including the leading strand polymerase, Pol ɛ. This chapter first describes how we design and prepare synthetic replication forks used in our CMG-related assays. Then we describe how to load CMG onto the fork. The Mcm2-7 motor subunits of CMG form a closed ring, as do all cellular replicative helicases, that encircles ssDNA for helicase function. Thus, the first step in these assays is the loading of CMG onto the fork DNA, followed by DNA unwinding and replication. We explain protocols for different strategies of preloading CMG onto the DNA fork using different ATP analogues. Additionally, the presence of Mcm10, an intimate partner of CMG, affects how CMG is preloaded onto a fork substrate.

The 9-1-1 DNA checkpoint clamp is loaded onto 5'-recessed DNA to activate the DNA damage checkpoint that arrests the cell cycle. The 9-1-1 clamp is a heterotrimeric ring that is loaded in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by Rad24-RFC (hRAD17-RFC), an alternate clamp loader in which Rad24 replaces Rfc1 in the RFC1-5 clamp loader of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA). The 9-1-1 clamp loading mechanism has been a mystery, because, unlike RFC, which loads PCNA onto a 3'-recessed junction, Rad24-RFC loads the 9-1-1 ring onto a 5'-recessed DNA junction. Here we report two cryo-EM structures of Rad24-RFC-DNA with a closed or 27-Å open 9-1-1 clamp. The structures reveal a completely unexpected mechanism by which a clamp can be loaded onto DNA. Unlike RFC, which encircles DNA, Rad24 binds 5'-DNA on its surface, not inside the loader, and threads the 3' ssDNA overhang into the 9-1-1 clamp from above the ring.

In all cell types, a multi-protein machinery is required to accurately duplicate the large duplex DNA genome. This central life process requires five core replisome factors in all cellular life forms studied thus far. Unexpectedly, three of the five core replisome factors have no common ancestor between bacteria and eukaryotes. Accordingly, the replisome machines of bacteria and eukaryotes have important distinctions in the way that they are organized and function. This chapter outlines the major replication proteins that perform DNA duplication at replication forks, with particular attention to differences and similarities in the strategies used by eukaryotes and bacteria.

In all cell types, a multi-protein machinery is required to accurately duplicate the large duplex DNA genome. This central life process requires five core replisome factors in all cellular life forms studied thus far. Unexpectedly, three of the five core replisome factors have no common ancestor between bacteria and eukaryotes. Accordingly, the replisome machines of bacteria and eukaryotes have important distinctions in the way that they are organized and function. This chapter outlines the major replication proteins that perform DNA duplication at replication forks, with particular attention to differences and similarities in the strategies used by eukaryotes and bacteria.

The replication of DNA in chromosomes is initiated at sequences called origins at which two replisome machines are assembled at replication forks that move in opposite directions. Interestingly, in vivo studies observe that the two replication forks remain fastened together, often referred to as a replication factory. Replication factories containing two replisomes are well documented in cellular studies of bacteria (Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis) and the eukaryote, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. This basic twin replisome factory architecture may also be preserved in higher eukaryotes. Despite many years of documenting the existence of replication factories, the molecular details of how the two replisome machines are tethered together has been completely unknown in any organism. Recent structural studies shed new light on the architecture of a eukaryote replisome factory, which brings with it a new twist on how a replication factory may function.

The current view is that eukaryotic replisomes are independent. Here we show that Ctf4 tightly dimerizes CMG helicase, with an extensive interface involving Psf2, Cdc45, and Sld5. Interestingly, Ctf4 binds only one Pol α-primase. Thus, Ctf4 may have evolved as a trimer to organize two helicases and one Pol α-primase into a replication factory. In the 2CMG-Ctf43-1Pol α-primase factory model, the two CMGs nearly face each other, placing the two lagging strands toward the center and two leading strands out the sides. The single Pol α-primase is centrally located and may prime both sister replisomes. The Ctf4-coupled-sister replisome model is consistent with cellular microscopy studies revealing two sister forks of an origin remain attached and are pushed forward from a protein platform. The replication factory model may facilitate parental nucleosome transfer during replication.

Termination of replication occurs when two forks converge, an important but understudied process. In PNAS, a report from the Courcelle group examines replication termination using deep-sequencing genomic profiling of replicating cells to obtain copy number information about head-on collision of replication forks in different genetic backgrounds (1). Mutations in the SbcC-SbcD (SbcCD) and ExoI nucleases of Escherichia coli result in overreplication of DNA at the terminal replication zone where forks converge, implying that extra DNA is made upon termination and these nucleases are needed to excise the extra DNA. Furthermore, mutational studies of the RecBCD helicase/nuclease reveal that it acts at a step after SbcCD/Exo1 action to complete the processing of overreplicated DNA generated by fork convergence. Overreplication upon termination in E. coli has been reported earlier, but the DNA structures produced, and subsequent processing steps are not well understood (2⇓–4). The report by Wendel et al. (1) demonstrates that termination of replication is a complex process orchestrated by many factors, and implies specific roles of the enzymes involved. Termination of replication, when two replication forks meet head-on, has the potential for deleterious consequences. For example, amplifications, resections leading to deletions, and other DNA rearrangements are associated with defective replication termination (1⇓⇓–4). Extensive studies have outlined the events that activate origins and advance replication forks in bacteria and eukaryotes (5, 6), but little is known about the replication termination process, possibly because termination does not occur at a defined sequence, making it difficult to study. The circular chromosome of E. coli has been an attractive model to study the termination process for two main reasons. First, E. coli has only one origin ( oriC ) that forms bidirectional forks that meet head-on roughly half way around the circular genome from the origin. Second, E. … [↵][1]1To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: odonnel{at}rockefeller.edu. [1]: #xref-corresp-1-1

The machines that decode and regulate genetic information require the translation, transcription and replication pathways essential to all living cells. Thus, it might be expected that all cells share the same basic machinery for these pathways that were inherited from the primordial ancestor cell from which they evolved. A clear example of this is found in the translation machinery that converts RNA sequence to protein. The translation process requires numerous structural and catalytic RNAs and proteins, the central factors of which are homologous in all three domains of life, bacteria, archaea and eukarya. Likewise, the central actor in transcription, RNA polymerase, shows homology among the catalytic subunits in bacteria, archaea and eukarya. In contrast, while some “gears” of the genome replication machinery are homologous in all domains of life, most components of the replication machine appear to be unrelated between bacteria and those of archaea and eukarya. This review will compare and contrast the central proteins of the “replisome” machines that duplicate DNA in bacteria, archaea and eukarya, with an eye to understanding the issues surrounding the evolution of the DNA replication apparatus.

Replicative helicases in all cell types are hexameric rings that unwind DNA by steric exclusion in which the helicase encircles the tracking strand only and excludes the other strand from the ring. This mode of translocation allows helicases to bypass blocks on the strand that is excluded from the central channel. Unlike other replicative helicases, eukaryotic CMG helicase partially encircles duplex DNA at a forked junction and is stopped by a block on the non-tracking (lagging) strand. This report demonstrates that Mcm10, an essential replication protein unique to eukaryotes, binds CMG and greatly stimulates its helicase activity in vitro. Most significantly, Mcm10 enables CMG and the replisome to bypass blocks on the non-tracking DNA strand. We demonstrate that bypass occurs without displacement of the blocks and therefore Mcm10 must isomerize the CMG-DNA complex to achieve the bypass function.

Replicative helicases of all cell types are rings that unwind DNA by steric exclusion in which the helicase ring only encircles the tracking strand, excluding the other strand outside the ring. Steric exclusion mediated unwinding enables helicase rings to bypass blocks on the strand that is excluded from the central channel. Unlike other replicative helicases, eukaryotic CMG encircles duplex DNA at a forked junction and is stopped by a block on the non-tracking (lagging) strand. This report demonstrates that Mcm10, an essential replication protein unique to eukaryotes, binds CMG and enables the replisome to bypass blocks on the non-tracking strand, implying that Mcm10 isomerizes the CMG-DNA complex to position only one strand through the central channel. A similar CMG-DNA isomerization is needed at the origin for head-to-head CMGs to bypass one another during formation of bidirectional replication forks.

Sliding clamps encircle DNA and tether polymerases and other factors to the genomic template. However, the molecular mechanism of clamp sliding on DNA is unknown. Using crystallography, NMR and molecular dynamics simulations, here we show that the human clamp PCNA recognizes DNA through a double patch of basic residues within the ring channel, arranged in a right-hand spiral that matches the pitch of B-DNA. We propose that PCNA slides by tracking the DNA backbone via a ‘cogwheel' mechanism based on short-lived polar interactions, which keep the orientation of the clamp invariant relative to DNA. Mutation of residues at the PCNA–DNA interface has been shown to impair the initiation of DNA synthesis by polymerase δ (pol δ). Therefore, our findings suggest that a clamp correctly oriented on DNA is necessary for the assembly of a replication-competent PCNA-pol δ holoenzyme., DNA sliding clamps are ring-shaped proteins that encircle DNA and harbour polymerases and other factors that promote processive DNA replication. Here the authors use X-ray crystallography, NMR and MD simulations to propose a model for a PCNA sliding mechanism that relies on short-lived polar interactions.

DNA replication in eukaryotes is asymmetric, with separate DNA polymerases (Pol) dedicated to bulk synthesis of the leading and lagging strands. Pol α/primase initiates primers on both strands that are extended by Pol ε on the leading strand and by Pol δ on the lagging strand. The CMG (Cdc45-MCM-GINS) helicase surrounds the leading strand and is proposed to recruit Pol ε for leading-strand synthesis, but to date a direct interaction between CMG and Pol ε has not been demonstrated. While purifying CMG helicase overexpressed in yeast, we detected a functional complex between CMG and native Pol ε. Using pure CMG and Pol ε, we reconstituted a stable 15-subunit CMG-Pol ε complex and showed that it is a functional polymerase-helicase on a model replication fork in vitro. On its own, the Pol2 catalytic subunit of Pol ε is inefficient in CMG-dependent replication, but addition of the Dpb2 protein subunit of Pol ε, known to bind the Psf1 protein subunit of CMG, allows stable synthesis with CMG. Dpb2 does not affect Pol δ function with CMG, and thus we propose that the connection between Dpb2 and CMG helps to stabilize Pol ε on the leading strand as part of a 15-subunit leading-strand holoenzyme we refer to as CMGE. Direct binding between Pol ε and CMG provides an explanation for specific targeting of Pol ε to the leading strand and provides clear mechanistic evidence for how strand asymmetry is maintained in eukaryotes.

Eukaryotes use distinct polymerases for leading- and lagging-strand replication, but how they target their respective strands is uncertain. We reconstituted Saccharomyces cerevisiae replication forks and found that CMG helicase selects polymerase (Pol) ɛ to the exclusion of Pol δ on the leading strand. Even if Pol δ assembles on the leading strand, Pol ɛ rapidly replaces it. Pol δ-PCNA is distributive with CMG, in contrast to its high stability on primed ssDNA. Hence CMG will not stabilize Pol δ, instead leaving the leading strand accessible for Pol ɛ and stabilizing Pol ɛ. Comparison of Pol ɛ and Pol δ on a lagging-strand model DNA reveals the opposite. Pol δ dominates over excess Pol ɛ on PCNA-primed ssDNA. Thus, PCNA strongly favors Pol δ over Pol ɛ on the lagging strand, but CMG over-rides and flips this balance in favor of Pol ɛ on the leading strand.

The concentration of ribonucleoside triphosphates (rNTPs) in cells is far greater than the concentration of deoxyribonucleoside triphosphates (dNTPs), and this pool imbalance presents a challenge for DNA polymerases (Pols) to select their proper substrate. This report examines the effect of nucleotide pool imbalance on the rate and fidelity of the Escherichia coli replisome. We find that rNTPs decrease replication fork rate by competing with dNTPs at the active site of the C-family Pol III replicase at a step that does not require correct base-pairing. The effect of rNTPs on Pol rate generalizes to B-family eukaryotic replicases, Pols δ and ε. Imbalance of the dNTP pool also slows the replisome and thus is not specific to rNTPs. We observe a measurable frequency of rNMP incorporation that predicts one rNTP incorporated every 2.3 kb during chromosome replication. Given the frequency of rNMP incorporation, the repair of rNMPs is likely rapid. RNase HII nicks DNA at single rNMP residues to initiate replacement with dNMP. Considering that rNMPs will mark the new strand, RNase HII may direct strand-specificity for mismatch repair (MMR). How the newly synthesized strand is recognized for MMR is uncertain in eukaryotes and most bacteria, which lack a methyl-directed nicking system. Here we demonstrate that Bacillus subtilis incorporates rNMPs in vivo, that RNase HII plays a role in their removal, and the RNase HII gene deletion enhances mutagenesis, suggesting a possible role of incorporated rNMPs in MMR.

Replicative polymerases are tethered to DNA by sliding clamps for processive DNA synthesis. Despite attachment to a sliding clamp, the polymerase on the lagging strand must cycle on and off DNA for each Okazaki fragment. In the 'collision release' model, the lagging strand polymerase collides with the 5' terminus of an earlier completed fragment, which triggers it to release from DNA and from the clamp. This report examines the mechanism of collision release by the Escherichia coli Pol III polymerase. We find that collision with a 5' terminus does not trigger polymerase release. Instead, the loss of ssDNA on filling in a fragment triggers polymerase to release from the clamp and DNA. Two ssDNA-binding elements are involved, the tau subunit of the clamp loader complex and an OB domain within the DNA polymerase itself. The tau subunit acts as a switch to enhance polymerase binding at a primed site but not at a nick. The OB domain acts as a sensor that regulates the affinity of Pol III to the clamp in the presence of ssDNA.

We have reconstituted a eukaryotic leading/lagging strand replisome comprising 31 distinct polypeptides. This study identifies a process unprecedented in bacterial replisomes. While bacteria and phage simply recruit polymerases to the fork, we find that suppression mechanisms are used to position the distinct eukaryotic polymerases on their respective strands. Hence, Pol ε is active with CMG on the leading strand, but it is unable to function on the lagging strand, even when Pol δ is not present. Conversely, Pol δ-PCNA is the only enzyme capable of extending Okazaki fragments in the presence of Pols ε and α. We have shown earlier that Pol δ-PCNA is suppressed on the leading strand with CMG (Georgescu et al., 2014). We propose that CMG, the 11-subunit helicase, is responsible for one or both of these suppression mechanisms that spatially control polymerase occupancy at the fork. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.04988.001, eLife digest Cells must replicate their DNA before they divide so that the newly formed cells can each receive a copy of the same genetic material. DNA replication requires complex molecular machinery called a replisome, which comprises multiple proteins, enzymes, and other molecules. First, an enzyme called a helicase starts to unwind the double-stranded DNA into two single strands. This process continues while other enzymes, called polymerases, use the exposed single strands as templates to make complementary new strands of DNA. One of these new strands is built continuously and called the ‘leading strand’. The other newly forming strand—the ‘lagging strand’—is made in the opposite direction, as a series of short fragments that are later joined together. The replisomes in bacterial cells have been well studied, but many researchers are investigating the composition of the replisome in animals, plants, and fungi (collectively called eukaryotes). Now, Georgescu et al. have essentially rebuilt a eukaryotic replisome from 31 different proteins in a test tube and confirmed that it can make both leading and lagging DNA strands—just like in a normal cell. Further experiments revealed that the polymerase enzyme that operates on the leading strand cannot work on the lagging strand and vice versa. This exclusivity is unique to eukaryotic DNA replication, as bacterial polymerases can use either DNA strand as a template. Georgescu et al. then found that the eukaryotic polymerases are actively prevented from copying the ‘wrong’ strand of DNA and suggest that the helicase enzyme that unwinds the DNA might be behind this activity. Important future studies must now address how the replisome deals with obstacles created by certain DNA-binding proteins and damaged DNA and how it interfaces with the molecules that control cell division and DNA repair. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.04988.002

The eukaryotic RFC clamp loader couples the energy of ATP hydrolysis to open and close the circular PCNA sliding clamp onto primed sites for use by DNA polymerases and repair factors. Structural studies reveal clamp loaders to be heteropentamers. Each subunit contains a region of homology to AAA+ proteins that defines two domains. The AAA+ domains form a right-handed spiral upon binding ATP. This spiral arrangement generates a DNA binding site within the center of RFC. DNA enters the central chamber through a gap between the AAA+ domains of two subunits. Specificity for a primed template junction is achieved by a third domain that blocks DNA, forcing it to bend sharply. Thus only DNA with a flexible joint can bind the central chamber. DNA entry also requires a slot in the PCNA clamp, which is opened upon binding the AAA+ domains of the clamp loader. ATP hydrolysis enables clamp closing and ejection of RFC, completing the clamp loading reaction.

The process of chromosome duplication faces many obstacles. One way to circumvent blocks is to hop over them by placing a new clamp on a downstream primer. This resembles lagging strand synthesis, where the tight grip of polymerase to the clamp and DNA must be overcome upon completing each Okazaki fragment so it can transfer to new primed sites. This review focuses on recent single-molecule studies showing that Escherichia coli Pol III can hop from one clamp to another without leaving the replication fork. This capability provides a means to circumvent obstacles like transcription or DNA lesions without fork collapse.

Single-molecule techniques are developed to examine mechanistic features of individual E. coli replisomes during synthesis of long DNA molecules. We find that single replisomes exhibit constant rates of fork movement, but the rates of different replisomes vary over a surprisingly wide range. Interestingly, lagging strand synthesis decreases the rate of the leading strand, suggesting that lagging strand operations exert a drag on replication fork progression. The opposite is true for processivity. The lagging strand significantly increases the processivity of the replisome, possibly reflecting the increased grip to DNA provided by 2 DNA polymerases anchored to sliding clamps on both the leading and lagging strands.

Replisomes are multiprotein complexes that unzip the parental helix and duplicate the separated strands during genome replication. The antiparallel structure of DNA poses unique geometric constraints to the process, and the replisome has evolved unique dynamic features that solve this problem. Interestingly, the solution to duplex DNA replication has been co-opted to solve many other important problems that replisomes must contend with during the duplication of long chromosomes. For example, along its path the replisome will encounter lesions and DNA-bound proteins. Recent studies show that the replisome can circumvent lesions on either strand, using the strategy normally applied to the lagging strand synthesis. Circumventing lesions can also be assisted by other proteins that transiently become a part of the replisome. The replisome must also contend with DNA-binding proteins and recent studies reveal a fascinating process that enables it to bypass RNA polymerase without stopping.

Replisomes are dynamic multiprotein machines capable of simultaneously replicating both strands of the DNA duplex. This review focuses on the structure and function of the E. coli replisome, many features of which generalize to other bacteria and eukaryotic cells. For example, the bacterial replisome utilizes clamps and clamp loaders to coordinate the actions required of the trombone model of lagging strand synthesis made famous by Bruce Alberts. All cells contain clamps and clamp loaders and this review summarizes their structure and function. Clamp loaders are pentameric spirals that bind DNA in a structure specific fashion and thread it through the ring shaped clamp. The recent structure of the E. coli beta clamp in complex with primed DNA has implications for how multiple polymerases function on sliding clamps and how the primed DNA template is exchanged between them. Recent studies reveal a remarkable fluidity in replisome function that enables it to bypass template lesions on either DNA strand. During these processes the polymerases within the replisome functionally uncouple from one another. Mechanistic processes that underlie these actions may involve DNA looping, similar to the trombone loops that mediate the lagging strand Okazaki fragment synthesis cycle.

The eukaryotic replication factor C (RFC) clamp loader is an AAA+ spiral-shaped heteropentamer that opens and closes the circular proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) clamp processivity factor on DNA. In this study, we examined the roles of individual RFC subunits in opening the PCNA clamp. Interestingly, Rfc1, which occupies the position analogous to the delta clamp-opening subunit in the Escherichia coli clamp loader, is not required to open PCNA. The Rfc5 subunit is required to open PCNA. Consistent with this result, Rfc2.3.4.5 and Rfc2.5 subassemblies are capable of opening and unloading PCNA from circular DNA. Rfc5 is positioned opposite the PCNA interface from Rfc1, and therefore, its action with Rfc2 in opening PCNA indicates that PCNA is opened from the opposite side of the interface that the E. coli delta wrench acts upon. This marks a significant departure in the mechanism of eukaryotic and prokaryotic clamp loaders. Interestingly, the Rad.RFC DNA damage checkpoint clamp loader unloads PCNA clamps from DNA. We propose that Rad.RFC may clear PCNA from DNA to facilitate shutdown of replication in the face of DNA damage.

In all organisms, successful cell division requires accurate copying of chromosomal DNA. To duplicate their genomes, all cells use a multiprotein apparatus known as the replisome (reviewed by Benkovic et al., 2001; McHenry, 2003; Yao and O’Donnell, 2009). The fundamental components of the replisome are conserved across viruses, bacteria, archaea, and eukaryotes (Table). They include a helicase to unwind the double-stranded DNA, a polymerase(s) to synthesize new strands of DNA, and a clamp loader to organize the complex on the DNA. The replisome assemblies at a region of the DNA, called the replication fork, where the double-stranded DNA is separated into two individual strands, which are both subsequently copied in the 5′ to 3′ direction of the DNA. In this SnapShot, we compare the specific components of the replisome in Escherichia coli with those of the replisome in eukaryotes. In addition, we describe how the lagging strand is synthesized from Okazaki fragments. Table