Search

Although Doxorubicin is the standard of care in advanced soft tissue sarcomas, therapeutic efficacy is minimal. A major contributing factor appears to be an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). We have shown that liposomal alendronate, an amino-bisphosphonate, can remodel the immunosuppressive TME towards an immune-permissive milieu. We postulate that co-encapsulating alendronate with doxorubicin in pegylated liposomes (PLAD) will increase the efficacy of doxorubicin as alendronate abrogates the activity of suppressive myeloid cells and liposomes facilitate the accumulation of drugs in tumors. PLAD was formulated with hydrogenated soybean phosphatidyl-choline, methoxy-polyethylene glycol2000-distearoyl-phosphatidylethanolamine, and cholesterol at a molar ratio of 55:5:40, with 1 mg/ml doxorubicin and 0.43 mg/ml alendronate. WEHI-164 fibrosarcoma cells were implanted subcutaneously in male balb/c mice. For assessing the tumor immunologic milieu, mice were randomized when tumor size reached ~300 mm3 to receive PLAD, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD), or free doxorubicin (FDox) at 8 mg/kg of doxorubicin (n=9/group) or vehicle (n=5) IV. Tumors were collected 5 days post-treatment for FACS analysis. To assess antitumor efficacy, mice were randomized when tumor size reached ~150 mm3 to receive PLAD, PLD, or FDox at 5 mg/kg of doxorubicin (n=9/group) or vehicle (n=5) IV weekly and euthanized at humane endpoints. PLAD, and to a lesser extent PLD, shifted cellular drug uptake to tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) and to monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells (mMDSC) compared to free doxorubicin which had cellular drug uptake below detectable levels. PLAD and PLD were associated with fewer total TAMs and a decreased polarization to pro-tumoral M2-TAMs compared to free doxorubicin. Only PLAD significantly increased tumor infiltration of antigen cross-presenting dendritic cells, while both PLAD and PLD significantly increased the number and functionality of NKT and NK cells that are consistent with enhanced antitumor immune responses in the TME. All treatments significantly reduced regulatory T cell infiltration which could help promote antitumor responses in the TME. Interestingly, FDox treatment induced significant changes in the TME that could diminish antitumor immune responses by decreasing M1 TAMs and NK cells. These effects are reflected in the therapeutic study which demonstrates that PLAD and PLD inhibited tumor growth and significantly prolonged survival, while free doxorubicin showed little or no anticancer activity in this advanced fibrosarcoma model. We found that liposomal delivery is required for effective drug uptake by the TAMs and mMDSCs. Co-encapsulation of alendronate and doxorubicin led to a remodeling of the TME by abrogating pro-tumoral immune responses. This strongly suggests that the PLAD formulation is a promising liposome-based drug carrier to potentiate immunotherapy in synergy with its cytotoxic effects. Citation Format: Md Rakibul Islam, Jalpa Patel, Patricia Ines Back, Hilary Shmeeda, Konstantin Adamsky, Hui Yang, Carlos Alvarez, Alberto A Gabizon, Ninh M La-Beck. Impact of liposomal drug delivery and alendronate co-encapsulation on the immune modulatory effects of doxorubicin in the tumor microenvironment [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy; 2022 Oct 21-24; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2022;10(12 Suppl):Abstract nr A42.

The rapidly expanding repertoire of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) now includes two agents, pembrolizumab and atezolizumab, approved for first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) as monotherapy or as part of chemoimmunotherapy. This review summarizes the clinical evidence supporting these indications, with a focus on strategies to optimize patient outcomes. These strategies include patient and tumor factors, adverse-effect profiles, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic drug interactions, and quality of life and cost-effectiveness considerations. We performed a systematic literature search of the PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases, as well as a search of the conference proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, European Society for Medical Oncology, and American Association for Cancer Research (through August 31, 2019). The addition of ICIs to conventional chemotherapy as first-line treatment against aNSCLC is now part of the standard of care options. However, even though ICIs may be cost-effective in patients with aNSCLC, high drug and other associated costs can still be a barrier to treatment for patients. Moreover, the adverse-effect profiles of ICIs differ significantly from conventional chemotherapy, and some immune-related adverse effects may have a lasting impact on quality of life. Therefore, in adhering to a patient-centered model of care, clinicians should be mindful of patient- and treatment-specific factors when considering therapeutic options for patients with aNSCLC. Although the role of the immune system in cancer progression and regression has not been fully elucidated, the full clinical potential of immunotherapeutics in the treatment of cancer likely remains to be unleashed.

Nanoparticles can provide effective control of the release rate and tissue distribution of their drug payload, leading to major pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic changes vis-à-vis the conventional administration of free drugs. In the last two decades, we have witnessed major progress in the synthesis and characterization of engineered nanoparticles for imaging and treatment of cancers, resulting in the approval for clinical use of several products and in new and promising approaches. Despite these advances, clinical applications of nanoparticle-based therapeutic and imaging agents remain limited due to biological, immunological, and translational barriers. There is a need to make high impact advances toward translation. In this review, we address biological, toxicological, immunological, and translational aspects of nanomedicine and discuss approaches to move the field forward productively. Overcoming these barriers may dramatically improve the development potential and role of nanomedicines in the oncology field and help meet the high expectations.

Melanoma continues to be an aggressive and deadly form of skin cancer while therapeutic options are continuously developing in an effort to provide long-term solutions for patients. Immunotherapeutic strategies incorporating antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have seen varied levels of success across tumor types and represent a promising approach for melanoma. This review will explore the successes of FDA-approved ADCs to date compared to the ongoing efforts of melanoma-targeting ADCs. The challenges and opportunities for future therapeutic development are also examined to distinguish how ADCs may better impact individuals with malignancies such as melanoma.

Liposomal nanoparticles are the most commonly used drug nano-delivery platforms. However, recent reports show that certain pegylated liposomal nanoparticles (PLNs) and polymeric nanoparticles have the potential to enhance tumor growth and inhibit antitumor immunity in murine cancer models. We sought herein to identify the mechanisms and determine whether PLN-associated immunosuppression and tumor growth can be reversed using alendronate, an immune modulatory drug. By conducting in vivo and ex vivo experiments with the immunocompetent TC-1 murine tumor model, we found that macrophages were the primary cells that internalized PLN in the tumor microenvironment and that PLN-induced tumor growth was dependent on macrophages. Treatment with PLN increased immunosuppression as evidenced by increased expression of arginase-1 in CD11b+Gr1+ cells, diminished M1 functionality in macrophages, and globally suppressed T-cell cytokine production. Encapsulating alendronate in PLN reversed these effects on myeloid cells and shifted the profile of multi-cytokine producing T-cells towards an IFNγ+ perforin+ response, suggesting increased cytotoxic functionality. Importantly, we also found that PLN-encapsulated alendronate (PLN-alen), but not free alendronate, abrogated PLN-induced tumor growth and increased progression-free survival. In summary, we have identified a novel mechanism of PLN-induced tumor growth through macrophage polarization and immunosuppression that can be targeted and inactivated to improve the anticancer efficacy of PLN-delivered drugs. Importantly, we also determined that PLN-alen not only reversed protumoral effects of the PLN carrier, but also had moderate antitumor activity. Our findings strongly support the inclusion of immune-responsive tumor models and in-depth immune functional studies in the preclinical drug development paradigm for cancer nanomedicines, and the further development of chemo-immunotherapy strategies to co-deliver alendronate and chemotherapy for the treatment of cancer.

Amino-bisphosphonates (N-BPs) have been commercially available for over four decades and are used for the treatment of osteoporosis, Paget's disease, hypercalcemia of malignancy, and bone metastases derived from various cancer types. Zoledronate and alendronate, two of the most potent N-BPs, have demonstrated direct tumoricidal activity on tumor cells and immune modulatory effects on myeloid cells and T cells in vitro and in animal models of cancer. However, the rapid renal clearance and sequestration in mineral bone of these drugs in free form severely limit their systemic exposure and applications in cancer patients. Reformulation of N-BPs by encapsulation in liposomal nanoparticles addresses these pharmacokinetic barriers, and liposomal zoledronate and alendronate formulations have been found to increase the anticancer efficacy of cytotoxic chemotherapies and adoptive T cell immunotherapies in murine cancer models. Herein, we review the differences in pharmacology between N-BPs versus non-N-BPs (e.g., clodronate), free versus liposomal N-BP formulations, and targeted versus non-targeted liposomal N-BPs, and the clinical and preclinical evidence supporting a role for liposomal N-BPs in the treatment of cancer. We propose that pegylated liposomal alendronate (PLA) has the most potential for clinical translation based on favorable therapeutic index, ability to passively target and accumulate in tumors, proven biocompatibility of the liposome carrier, and preclinical anticancer efficacy.

We herein review various pharmacological and clinical aspects of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD), the first nanomedicine to be approved for cancer therapy, and discuss the gap between its potent antitumor activity in preclinical studies and its comparatively modest achievements in clinical studies and limited use in clinical practice. PLD is a complex formulation of doxorubicin based on pharmaceutical nanotechnology with unique pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. Its long circulation time with stable retention of the payload and its accumulation in tumors with high vascular permeability both result in important advantages over conventional chemotherapy. The ability of PLD to buffer a number of undesirable side effects of doxorubicin, including a major risk reduction in cardiac toxicity, is now well-established and confers a major added value in a number of disease conditions. PLD is approved for the treatment of ovarian cancer, breast cancer, multiple myeloma, and Kaposi sarcoma. In addition, clinically significant antitumor activity of PLD has been reported in a number of other cancer types, including lymphomas and soft tissue sarcomas. In spite of this, PLD has not replaced conventional doxorubicin in common applications such as the adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer, and its use in the clinic has not become as widespread as one may have predicted. Exploiting the unique pharmacology of PLD, analyzing its selective biodistribution and homing to tumors in cancer patients with proper theranostic tools, and harnessing its complex interaction with the immune system, will lead to a more selective and rational use of PLD that may have great impact on future clinical results and may help realize its largely untapped potential.

While liposome-mediated delivery of cytotoxic chemotherapy has been shown to significantly enhance drug tolerability in patients as compared to the conventional formulation, the fundamental question remains whether they also improve anticancer efficacy. Thus, we performed a systematic literature search for randomized clinical trials directly comparing efficacy of liposomal cytotoxic chemotherapy versus their equivalent conventional formulation. The search yielded 14 clinical trials (8 anthracycline, 4 cisplatin, 1 paclitaxel, 1 irinotecan) that meet inclusion criteria, with a total of 2589 patients. We found that efficacy in patients was not different between liposomal and conventional chemotherapy as assessed by objective response (odds ratio 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.82-1.30), overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] 1.05; 95% CI 0.95-1.17), and progression free survival rates (HR 1.01; 95% CI, 0.92-1.11). Subgroup analyses of only the anthracycline trials also did not show any efficacy advantage for the liposomal formulation. Since pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) was the most prevalent formulation in these clinical trials, we also performed a meta-analysis of 11 preclinical studies comparing efficacy of PLD and conventional doxorubicin in tumor-bearing mice. In contrast with clinical results, animal studies showed significantly increased survival in mice treated with PLD compared to conventional doxorubicin (HR 0.39; 95% CI 0.27-0.56). We discuss the possible reasons why the pharmacological advantages of carrier-mediated chemotherapy did not translate into enhanced clinical efficacy including the role of the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect and the tumor microenvironment, the optimal dosing regimen for carrier-mediated agents, and the lack of standardization in the conduct and reporting of preclinical studies evaluating anticancer efficacy of these agents. Our study shows that the full clinical potential of carrier-mediated drugs remains to be realized and highlights some of the critical knowledge gaps that must be addressed in order to move the field forward.

Mitomycin C (MMC) has potent cytotoxicity but cumulative toxicity limits widespread use. In animals, pegylated liposomal mitomycin C lipid-based prodrug (PL-MLP) was well tolerated and more effective than free MMC. We evaluated PL-MLP in patients with advanced cancer. Twenty-seven patients were treated in escalating dose cohorts of 0.5–3.5 mg/kg (equivalent to 0.15–1.03 mg/kg MMC) every 4 weeks for up to 12 cycles, unless disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. Pharmacokinetics were assessed during cycles 1 and 3. Per protocol maximum tolerated dose was not reached at 3.5 mg/kg. However, prolonged thrombocytopenia developed after repeated doses of 3 mg/kg or cumulative doses of 10–12 mg/kg. Dose-related grade 3 or higher adverse events included fatigue, anemia, and decreased platelets. Cmax and AUC0-∞ increased linearly over the dose range 0.5–2.0 mg/kg, and greater than linearly from 2.5 to 3.5 mg/kg; there were no significant differences in clearance of MLP between cycles 1 and 3. Median t1/2 was 23 h among dose cohorts, with no trend by dose or cycle. One patient had a partial response. Stable disease was observed in 10 patients across all dose levels. PL-MLP has a long circulation time, was well tolerated, and can be administered to heavily pretreated patients at a single dose of 3.0 mg/kg and cumulative dose of 10–12 mg/kg before development of prolonged thrombocytopenia; this is nearly threefold the equivalent dose of MMC tolerated historically. This formulation may be active in a variety of tumor types and is better tolerated than free MMC.

Autophagy dysregulation has been implicated in numerous diseases and many therapeutic agents are known to modulate this pathway. Therefore, the ability to accurately monitor autophagy is critical to understanding its role in the pathogenesis and treatment of many diseases. Recently an imaging flow cytometry method measuring colocalization of microtubule associated protein 1B light chain 3 (LC3) and lysosomal signals via Bright Detail Similarity (BDS) was proposed which enabled evaluation of autophagic processing. However, since BDS only evaluates colocalization of LC3 and lysosomal signals, the number of autophagy organelles was not taken into account. We found that in cells classified as having Low BDS, there was a large degree of variability in accumulation of autophagosomes. Therefore, we developed a new approach wherein BDS was combined with number of LC3+ puncta, which enabled us to distinguish between cells having very few autophagy organelles versus cells with accumulation of autophagosomes or autolysosomes. Using this method, we were able to distinguish and quantify autophagosomes and autolysosomes in breast cancer cells cultured under basal conditions, with inhibition of autophagy using chloroquine, and with induction of autophagy using amino acid starvation. This technique yields additional insight into autophagy processing making it a useful supplement to current techniques.

The development of stable and long-circulating liposomes provides protection of the drug cargo from degradation and increases tumor drug delivery, leading to the design of liposome formulations with great potential in cancer therapy. However, despite the sound pharmacologic basis, many liposomal as well as other nanoparticle-based drug formulations have failed to meet regulatory criteria for approval. The question that arises is whether we have missed key liposome–host interactions that can account for the gap between the major pharmacologic advantages in preclinical studies and the modest impact of the clinical effects in humans. We will discuss here the nanoparticle–immune system interactions that may undermine the antitumor effect of the nanodrug formulations and contribute to this gap. To overcome this challenge and increase clinical translation, new preclinical models need to be adopted along with comprehensive immunopharmacologic studies and strategies for patient selection in the clinical phase.

The development of stable and long-circulating liposomes provides protection of the drug cargo from degradation and increases tumor drug delivery, leading to the design of liposome formulations with great potential in cancer therapy. However, despite the sound pharmacologic basis, many liposomal as well as other nanoparticle-based drug formulations have failed to meet regulatory criteria for approval. The question that arises is whether we have missed key liposome-host interactions that can account for the gap between the major pharmacologic advantages in preclinical studies and the modest impact of the clinical effects in humans. We will discuss here the nanoparticle-immune system interactions that may undermine the antitumor effect of the nanodrug formulations and contribute to this gap. To overcome this challenge and increase clinical translation, new preclinical models need to be adopted along with comprehensive immunopharmacologic studies and strategies for patient selection in the clinical phase.

As nanoparticles (NPs) are cleared via phagocytes of the mononuclear phagocyte system (MPS), we hypothesized that the function of circulating monocytes and dendritic cells (MO/DC) in blood can predict NP clearance (CL). We measured MO/DC phagocytosis and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in mice, rats, dogs, and patients with refractory solid tumors. Pharmacokinetic studies of polyethylene glycol (PEG)-encapsulated liposomal doxorubicin (PEGylated liposomal doxirubicin [PLD]), CKD-602 (S-CKD602), and cisplatin (SPI-077) were performed at the maximum tolerated dose. MO/DC function was also evaluated in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) administered PLD. Across species, a positive association was observed between cell function and CL of PEGylated liposomes. In patients with EOC, associations were observed between PLD CL and phagocytosis (R(2) = 0.43, P = 0.04) and ROS production (R(2) = 0.61, P = 0.008) in blood MO/DC. These findings suggest that probes of MPS function may help predict PEGylated liposome CL across species and PLD CL in patients with EOC.

BACKGROUND Thyroid dysfunction and hypertension (HTN) have been sporadically reported with sunitinib (SUN) and sorafenib (SOR). Determination of the side effect incidence will enhance monitoring and management recommendations. METHODS An observational cohort study was performed using deidentified pharmacy claims data from a 3-year period to evaluate patients prescribed SUN, SOR, or capecitabine (CAP; comparison group). The primary outcome was time to first prescription for thyroid replacement or HTN treatment. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated by Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS A total of 20,061 patients were eligible for evaluation of thyroid replacement therapy, which was initiated in 11.6% of those receiving SUN (HR, 16.77; 95% CI, 13.54-20.76), 2.6% of those receiving SOR (HR, 3.47; 95% CI, 2.46-4.98), and 1% of those receiving CAP, with median time to initiation of 4 months (range, 1-35 months). A total of 14,468 patients were eligible for evaluation of HTN therapy, which was initiated in 21% of SUN recipients (HR, 4.91; 95% CI, 4.19-5.74), 14% of SOR recipients (HR, 3.25; 95% CI, 2.69-3.91), and 5% of CAP recipients, with median time to initiation of 1 month (range, 1-18 months) for SOR and 2 months (range, 1-25 months) for SUN. CONCLUSION SUN and SOR significantly increased the risk for clinically relevant hypothyroidism; the risk was at least 4 times greater with SUN than with SOR. Patients receiving SUN and SOR had a similar elevated risk for clinically relevant HTN. These data provide robust measures of the incidence and time to onset of these clinically actionable adverse events. The Oncologist 2017;22:208-212Implications for Practice: The side effect profiles for novel therapies are typically used to create monitoring and management recommendations using clinical trial data from patient populations that may not represent those seen in standard clinical practice. This analysis using a large pharmacy claims database better reflects typical patients treated with sorafenib or sunitinib outside of a clinical trial. The findings of increased need for thyroid replacement in patients receiving sunitinib compared with sorafenib and a similar increase in need for hypertension therapy with both agents can be used to form clinically relevant monitoring recommendations for these agents.

The treatment of cancer has largely relied on killing tumor cells with nonspecific cytotoxic therapies and radiotherapy. This approach, however, has limitations including severe systemic toxicities, bystander effects on normal cells, recurrence of drug-resistant tumor cells, and the inability to target micrometastases or subclinical disease. An increased understanding of the critical role of the immune system in cancer development and progression has led to new treatment strategies using various immunotherapies. It is now recognized that established tumors have numerous mechanisms of suppressing the antitumor immune response including production of inhibitory cytokines, recruitment of immunosuppressive immune cells, and upregulation of coinhibitory receptors known as immune checkpoints. This review focuses on the immune checkpoint inhibitors, a novel class of immunotherapy first approved in 2011. Our objective is to highlight similarities and differences among the three immune checkpoint inhibitors approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration-ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, and nivolumab-to facilitate therapeutic decision making. We conducted a review of the published literature and conference proceedings and present a critical appraisal of the clinical evidence supporting their use in the treatment of metastatic melanoma and advanced squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We also compare and contrast their current place in cancer therapy and patterns of immune-related toxicities, and discuss the role of dual immune checkpoint inhibition and strategies for the management of immune-related adverse events. The immune checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated a dramatic improvement in overall survival in patients with advanced melanoma and squamous NSCLC, along with acceptable toxicity profiles. These agents have a clear role in the first-line treatment of advanced melanoma and in the second-line treatment of advanced squamous NSCLC.