Search

Chronic liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are life-threatening diseases with limited treatment options. The lack of clinically relevant/tractable experimental models hampers therapeutic discovery. Here, we develop a simple and robust human liver cell-based system modeling a clinical prognostic liver signature (PLS) predicting long-term liver disease progression toward HCC. Using the PLS as a readout, followed by validation in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis/fibrosis/HCC animal models and patient-derived liver spheroids, we identify nizatidine, a histamine receptor H2 (HRH2) blocker, for treatment of advanced liver disease and HCC chemoprevention. Moreover, perturbation studies combined with single cell RNA-Seq analyses of patient liver tissues uncover hepatocytes and HRH2 + , CLEC5A high , MARCO low liver macrophages as potential nizatidine targets. The PLS model combined with single cell RNA-Seq of patient tissues enables discovery of urgently needed targets and therapeutics for treatment of advanced liver disease and cancer prevention., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Nizatidine (NIZ), a histamine H 2 -receptor antagonist, is soluble and stable in the stomach, however, it exhibits a short half-life and a rapid clearance. Therefore, chitosan (CS) and polyethylene oxide (PEO) nanofibers (NFs) at different weight ratios were prepared by electrospinning and characterized. The selected uncrosslinked and glutaraldehyde-crosslinked NFs were investigated regarding floating, solid-state characteristics, in vitro release, and in vitro cytotoxicity. The cytoprotective activity against ethanol-induced gastric injury in rats was evaluated through macroscopical, histopathological, immunohistochemical, and oxidative stress examinations. NFs based on 8:2 CS:PEO exhibited the smallest diameter (119.17 ± 22.05 nm) and the greatest mucoadhesion (22.82 ± 3.21 g/cm 2 ), so they were crosslinked with glutaraldehyde. Solid-state characterization indicated polymers interaction, a successful crosslinking, and NIZ dispersion in NFs. Crosslinking maintained swollen mats at pH 1.2 (swelling% = 29.47 ± 3.50% at 24 h), retarded their erosion at pH 6.8 (swelling%= 84.64 ± 4.91% vs. 25.40 ± 0.79% for the uncrosslinked NFs at 24 h), augmented the floating up to 24 h vs. 10 min for the uncrosslinked NFs at pH 1.2 and prolonged the drug release (%drug released ≥ 93% at 24 h vs. 4 and 5 h for the uncrosslinked NFs at pHs 1.2 and 6.8, respectively). The viability of Caco-2 cells ≥ 86.87 ± 6.86% revealed NFs biocompatibility and unreacted glutaraldehyde removal. Crosslinking of 8:2 CS:PEO NFs potentiated the antiulcer activity (38.98 vs. 8.67 for the uncrosslinked NFs) as well as it preserved the gastric wall architecture, COX-2 expression, and oxidative stress markers levels of the normal rats.

Background and Objectives: In the proximal tubule, basic drugs are transported from the renal cells to the tubule lumen through the concerted action of the H(+)/organic cation antiporters, multidrug and toxin extrusion (MATE) 1 and MATE2K. Dual inhibitors of the MATE transporters have been shown to have a clinically relevant effect on the pharmacokinetics of concomitantly administered basic drugs. However, the clinical impact of selective renal organic cation transport inhibition on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of basic drugs, such as metformin, is unknown. This study sought to identify a selective MATE2K inhibitor in vitro and to determine its clinical impact on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of metformin in healthy subjects., Methods: Strategic cell-based screening of 71 US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved medications was conducted to identify selective inhibitors of renal organic cation transporters that are capable of inhibiting at clinically relevant concentrations. From this screen, nizatidine was identified and predicted to be a clinically potent and selective inhibitor of MATE2K-mediated transport. The effect of nizatidine on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of metformin was evaluated in 12 healthy volunteers in an open-label, randomized, two-phase crossover drug-drug interaction (DDI) study., Results: In healthy volunteers, the MATE2K-selective inhibitor nizatidine significantly increased the apparent volume of distribution, half-life, and hypoglycemic activity of metformin. However, despite achieving unbound maximum concentrations greater than the in vitro inhibition potency (concentration of drug producing 50% inhibition [IC50]) of MATE2K-mediated transport, nizatidine did not affect the renal clearance (CLR) or net secretory clearance of metformin., Conclusion: This study demonstrates that a selective inhibition of MATE2K by nizatidine affected the apparent volume of distribution, tissue concentrations, and peripheral effects of metformin. However, nizatidine did not alter systemic concentrations or the CLR of metformin, suggesting that specific MATE2K inhibition may not be sufficient to cause renal DDIs with metformin.

Purpose . It has been confirmed that inflammatory cytokines are involved in the progression of pterygium. Histamine can enhance proliferation and migration of many cells. Therefore, we intend to investigate the proliferative and migratory effects of histamine on primary culture of human pterygium fibroblasts (HPFs). Methods . Pterygium and conjunctiva samples were obtained from surgery, and toluidine blue staining was used to identify mast cells. 3-[4, 5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) was performed to evaluate the proliferative rate of HPFs and human conjunctival fibroblasts (HCFs); ki67 expression was also measured by immunofluorescence analysis. Histamine receptor-1 (H1R) antagonist (Diphenhydramine Hydrochloride) and histamine receptor-2 (H2R) antagonist (Nizatidine) were added to figure out which receptor was involved. Wound healing model was used to evaluate the migratory ability of HPFs. Results . The numbers of total mast cells and degranulated mast cells were both higher in pterygium than in conjunctiva. Histamine had a proliferative effect on both HPFs and HCFs, the effective concentration (10  μ mol/L) on HPFs was lower than on HCFs (100  μ mol/L), and the effect could be blocked by H1R antagonist. Histamine showed no migratory effect on HPFs. Conclusion . Histamine may play an important role in the proliferation of HPFs and act through H1R.

Nizatidine (NIZ), closely related to Cimetidine, is a histamine H2 receptor inverse agonist used primarily as an anti-acid drug. Recent studies showed that this class of compounds may also modulate immune responses. To evaluate adjuvant effects of NIZ on vaccine immune modulation, we formulated NIZ with a H5N1 killed viral antigen and tested in vitro and in vivo. NIZ activated DC maturation and stimulated Th1 and Th2 immune responses to H5N1 vaccine. As a result, it enhanced both antibody and T cell-mediated immune responses. We also observed that a single immunization into C57BL/6 mice blocked IL-10 upregulation and potentiated Th1/Th2 dual polarization. Importantly, the inoculation of H5N1 vaccine with NIZ significantly improved protection of animals from death after challenge and reduced virus loads in the lung tissues. Considering its water-soluble nature, compared with Cimetidine, Nizatidine may be a better choice to use as a vaccine adjuvant.

Objective: The aim of this study was to identify alternative compounds to the tumor suppressor miR-375 using the connectivity map (CMAP) and to validate the antitumor effects of the identified drugs in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC)., Methods: Gene profiling of miR-375-treated TE2 and T.Tn cells was applied in order to search the CMAP database. Among the compounds identified using the CMAP, we focused on 8 drugs [(-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate, metformin, rosiglitazone among others], excluding 2 drugs among the top 10 compounds. We evaluated whether these compounds possess tumor-suppressive functions in ESCC., Results: A cytotoxicity assay showed that the sensitivity of TE2 and T.Tn cells treated with the 8 compounds was evaluated based on IC50 values of 42.9 µM to 3.8 mM. A cell cycle analysis revealed that the percentage of TE2 and T.Tn cells incubated with 6 compounds in the G0/G1 phase or the G2/M phase increased by approximately 40-80%. A TUNEL assay showed that the percentages of apoptotic cells treated with almost all compounds were significantly increased (p < 0.05) compared with the control cells., Conclusion: The CMAP database is a useful tool for identifying compounds affecting the same molecular pathways, particularly products that are difficult to apply via practical approaches, such as microRNAs., (© 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Background and Aims: The association between functional dyspepsia (FD) and sleep disorders has yet to be studied in detail. The aim of this study is to evaluate the risk factors associated with sleep disorders and the clinical response to nizatidine therapy for sleep disorders in Rome III-based FD patients., Methods: We enrolled 94 FD patients and 52 healthy volunteers. We used Rome III criteria to evaluate upper abdominal symptoms, and the Self-Rating Questionnaire for Depression scores to determine depression status. Sleep disorder was evaluated using Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) scores, and degree of anxiety by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Gastric motility was evaluated. Thirty-four FD patients were treated with nizatidine (300 mg/day) or placebo for 4 weeks in a crossover trial. The primary end point of this study was to determine whether nizatidine could improve clinical symptoms and sleep disorders in FD patients., Results: The global PSQI score for FD patients was significantly (P < 0.001) higher compared with healthy volunteers. There were significant correlations between global PSQI scores and total Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale and Self-Rating Questionnaire for Depression scores (P < 0.001, P < 0.0001, respectively) in FD patients than in healthy volunteers. We found significant relationships between subjective sleep quality and both Tmax and T1/2 values in FD patients. Nizatidine significantly improved certain clinical symptoms, gastric emptying, and global PSQI score compared with placebo treatment., Conclusion: Sleep disorders in FD patients correlated significantly with both clinical symptoms of dyspepsia and depression compared with healthy volunteers. Nizatidine significantly improved gastroesophageal reflux symptoms, gastric emptying, and sleep disorders in FD patients., (© 2013 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.)

Purpose: The objective of this study was to investigate the drug interaction between dasatinib and the gastric acid suppressants (H2-receptor antagonists (H2RA) famotidine and nizatidine and the proton pump inhibitor (PPI) lansoprazole in leukemia Japanese patients., Methods: Eighteen patients treated with dasatinib and H2RA, PPI or no acid suppressant from whom were obtained a total of 34 pharmacokinetic profiles were enrolled in the study. Dasatinib plasma concentrations from samples obtained just prior to and 1, 2, and 4 h after oral dasatinib administration were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography., Results: There were no significant correlations between the dose-adjusted total area under the observed plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(0-4)) of dasatinib and gender, age, weight, or body surface area. The only variable factor, the dasatinib dose-adjusted AUC(0-4) for patients administered an H2RA or PPI, was significantly lower than for patients not administered an acid suppressant (median (quartile 1-quartile 3) values: 1.47 (0.79-2.29) versus 3.51 (2.50-5.45) ng h/mL/mg, respectively, P = 0.0008). Moreover, the plasma concentration 2 h (C(2h)) after dasatinib administration gave a high correlation with the AUC(0-4) of dasatinib (r = 0.9419, P < 0.0001)., Conclusion: Clinicians should be aware that administration of an acid suppressant such as famotidine, nizatidine, and lansoprazole can decrease the absorption of dasatinib from the gastrointestinal tract, thereby resulting in a significant decrease in the plasma concentration of dasatinib. The combination of dasatinib and an acid suppressant requires careful therapeutic drug monitoring of the dasatinib plasma concentration to ensure effective patient exposure to the drug.

Background: A study in Japan has found that nizatidine (NIZ) is more effective than other histamine H2 receptor agonists (H2RAs) in treating reflux esophagitis (RE), although the NIZ group included a greater number of patients with severe RE. As there was no difference in the level of acid suppression among H2RAs, it is possible that NIZ has other effects on esophageal acid exposure (EAE) besides acid suppression. In this study, the effect of NIZ on transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs) and acid reflux was evaluated in healthy subjects., Methods: In 10 healthy subjects, while in a sitting position, esophageal motility and a pH study were measured for 3 hours after a meal on 2 separate days at least 2 weeks apart. Participants received an oral dose of 150 mg of NIZ, 60 min before the meal on one day and a placebo on the other. Both studies were preceded by a week of treatment with either NIZ (150 mg, bid) or a placebo and the order of treatment was randomized., Results: Basal LES pressure in the NIZ group (14.1 mmHg, median) was significantly greater than that of the placebo group (8.5 mmHg). The rate of TLESRs in the NIZ group (22.0/3 h) for the postprandial 3-hour period was significantly less than that of the placebo group (16.5/3 h) and the rate of acid reflux during TLESRs (24.7%) and the EAE (0.2%) in the NIZ group for the postprandial 3-hour period was also significantly less than that of the placebo group (74.4% and 2.8%, respectively)., Conclusion: NIZ significantly reduces acid reflux by inhibiting both the rate of TLESRs and acid reflux during TLESRs.

Objective: It was reported that salivary secretion increased in 30 volunteers with administered nizatidine. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether or not nizatidine enhances salivary secretion and improves the function of salivary glands in patients with dry mouth., Methods: Both basal and stimulated salivary secretions were measured before and after the administration of nizatidine for a month in 18 healthy adult volunteers and 38 patients with dry mouth. In 6/38 patients, salivary gland scintigraphy was performed., Results: After the administration of nizatidine for a month, salivary secretions significantly increased in the control and dry mouth patient groups compared to the pretreatment baseline. In addition, 25 of 38 dry mouth patients showed subjective improvements of oral dryness. In 3/4 patients, the function of salivary glands was improved on salivary gland scintigraphy., Conclusion: Nizatidine may reactivate salivary gland cells and be useful in the treatment of patients with dry month.

In clinical practice, H2-receptor antagonists, including nizatidine, in addition to their use in the treatment of peptic ulcer and gastroesophageal reflux, are also useful in alleviating dyspeptic symptoms. Patients with functional dyspepsia show a tendency to delayed gastric emptying. Results of preliminary studies have demonstrated that nizatidine has a prokinetic effect due to its cholinergic properties. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of nizatidine on gastric emptying in patients with functional dyspepsia. Sixteen patients with dyspeptic symptoms referred for gastroscopy by primary care physicians were enrolled in this randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind cross-over study. They received nizatidine 150 mg twice daily or placebo for 2 months. After a 1-month washout period, the 2-month treatment was repeated, with these patients acting as their own controls. Gastric emptying was measured by scintigraphy, and dyspeptic symptoms and quality of life were evaluated at the end of both treatment periods. Gastric emptying of solids during nizatidine therapy was prolonged (T1/2 110.1 +/- 76.7 vs. 65.6 +/- 23.2 min, P = 0.03), but nizatidine had no effect on gastric emptying of liquids. Nizatidine improved the symptom scores and seven of eight aspects of quality of life - but not significantly. In conclusion, nizatidine decreases the gastric emptying rate of solids without having a significant effect on symptoms or quality of life in functional dyspepsia.

Objectives: To characterize the impact of development on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of nizatidine., Methods: Children (age range, 5 days-18 years) and adults (age range, 18-50 years) were enrolled in four open-label trials. Nizatidine formulation and dose were determined by age: infants received 2 or 4 mg/kg i.v., children 2.5 or 5 mg/kg in one of three oral liquid formulations, and adolescents and adults received a fixed 150-mg capsule. Nizatidine and N-desmethylnizatidine concentrations were measured in serial post-dose plasma samples by a high-performance liquid chromatographic assay with mass spectrometric detection. Intragastric pH was recorded during a 24-hour post-dose interval., Results: Data on 93 subjects were combined with previous values from 36 individuals to cover an age group not adequately captured and to control for formulation effects. Dose-normalized exposure estimates revealed no apparent age dependence; however, maximum plasma concentration (298.5 +/- 100.7 v 552.8 +/- 152.4 ng/mL per mg/kg dose) and AUC0-infinity (954.4 +/- 379.8 v 1,573.0 +/- 347.4 ng*hour/mL per mg/kg dose) were reduced in extemporaneous formulations in apple juice. The apparent modest age dependence observed for total body clearance (Cl/F) (r = 0.365) and Vss/F (r = 0.221) reflected a formulation-dependent decrease in bioavailability rather than a true age effect. The age-associated changes in lambda z observed for nizatidine and its metabolite were predictable and consistent with developmental acquisition of renal function. Mean and median pH, as well as fraction of time that the dosing interval remained above target pH values, were significantly greater with administration of the drug than without., Conclusions: The biodisposition of nizatidine in children and adults is similar; however, response after a comparable weight-based dose is equal and potentially greater in children.

Background: The role of teprenone in Helicobacter pylori-associated gastritis has yet to be determined. To investigate the effect of teprenone on inflammatory cell infiltration, and on H. pylori colonization of the gastric mucosa in H. pylori-infected patients, we first compared the effect of teprenone with that of both histamine H2 receptor antagonists (H2-RA) and sucralfate on the histological scores of H. pylori gastritis. We then examined its in vitro effect on H. pylori-induced interleukin (IL)-8 production in MKN28 gastric epithelial cells., Materials and Methods: A total of 68 patients were divided into three groups, each group undergoing a 3-month treatment with either teprenone (150 mg/day), H2-RA (nizatidine, 300 mg/day), or sucralfate (3 g/day). All subjects underwent endoscopic examination of the stomach before and after treatment. IL-8 production in MKN28 gastric epithelial cells was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)., Results: Following treatment, the teprenone group showed a significant decrease in both neutrophil infiltration and H. pylori density of the corpus (before vs. after: 2.49 +/- 0.22 vs. 2.15 +/- 0.23, p =.009; 2.36 +/- 0.25 vs. 2.00 +/- 0.24, p =.035, respectively), with no significant differences seen in either the sucralfate or H2-RA groups. Teprenone inhibited H. pylori-enhanced IL-8 production in MKN28 gastric epithelial cells in vitro, in a dose-dependent manner., Conclusions: Teprenone may modify corpus H. pylori-associated gastritis through its effect on neutrophil infiltration and H. pylori density, in part by its inhibition of IL-8 production in the gastric mucosa.

Saliva is a neurally induced solution with buffering capacity against acidic solutions. Salivation therefore plays an important role in defending the esophageal mucosa against refluxed gastric acid and is evoked by cholinergic stimulation. Both nizatidine and cisapride are reported to increase acetylcholine concentrations in the postganglionic cholinergic synapses. We performed this study to clarify the effect of administration of nizatidine and cisapride on salivary secretion. Eight-week-old male Sprague-Dawley rats were used for the experiments. Histamine-stimulated gastric acid secretion was measured after intraduodenal administration of nizatidine or famotidine to determine the equipotent acid-suppressing doses. Salivary secretion was then measured for 3 hr after intraduodenal administration of nizatidine (30 mg/kg), famotidine (3 mg/kg), or cisapride (1 mg/kg). Both nizatidine and famotidine dose-dependently inhibited histamine-stimulated gastric acid secretion. Total salivary secretion was significantly increased by nizatidine (P = 0.02) and cisapride (P = 0.02) but not by famotidine (P = 0.50) compared with controls.

Nizatidine (CAS 76963-41-2, Acinon), an H2 receptor antagonist, not only inhibits acid secretion but also improves gastrointestinal motility. However, autonomic nervous function has not been studied in detail using electrogastrography (EGG). In the present study, two protocols were adopted to study nizatidine's effects on cardiac autonomic function and gastric motility. Protocol I--Acute: "Group C-I": 10 healthy volunteers received a single oral dose of nizatidine 150 mg. Protocol II--Chronic: "Group DM without N": 15 patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) were observed prior to administration of nizatidine. "Group DM with N": The same 15 patients with DM received nizatidine 300 mg/day for more than 30 days. "Group C-II": This control group was composed of 15 healthy volunteers not receiving nizatidine. In all groups, EGGs were recorded before and after a meal, and autonomic nervous function and QT interval of ECG dispersions were simultaneously evaluated. In Group C-I, nizatidine significantly increased the peak power amplitude of 3 cycles/min (cpm) frequency, but did not significantly change the dominant frequency of the 3-cpm waves. In Group DM with N, nizatidine administration significantly increased the peak power amplitude from 2.4 cpm or a lower frequency (bradygastria) to 3 cpm. Prior to nizatidine administration but after eating a meal, the peak power amplitude on EGG was not increased in Group DM without N. In Group DM with N, however, the EGG peak power amplitude increased to levels similar to those of the healthy subjects (Group C-II). Neither the single nor the chronic administration of nizatidine significantly prolonged the QT interval or increased the QT dispersion. A spectral analysis of heart rate variability showed that nizatidine administration, whether acute or chronic, did not significantly change the indices of autonomic nervous activity. Nizatidine may promote gastric emptying by inhibiting acetylcholine esterase, thus increasing cholinergic activity, and by acting directly on gastric smooth muscle. The results indicate that because nizatidine increases gastric motility without exerting a negative influence on the autonomic nerves, it may be a useful drug in patients with diabetic neuropathy.

The pharmacokinetics and intragastric pH effects of a novel nizatidine controlled-release (CR) formulation were compared to a currently marketed immediate-release (IR) nizatidine formulation (Axid). The bimodal pulsatile release characteristics of nizatidine CR decreased its Cmax by approximately 42% compared to nizatidine IR while maintaining 90% relative bioavailability; tmax was approximately 1.6 times longer with the CR formulation. These characteristics enabled controlled-release nizatidine to sustain effective plasma drug concentrations for a greater duration than immediate-release nizatidine over the dosing intervals. In multiple doses, the 24-hour AUC ratio for all comparisons of nizatidine CR 150 mg bid, nizatidine CR 300 mg daily, and nizatidine IR 150 mg bid was between 97% and 99%. Mean pH AUC values for nizatidine CR 150 mg bid and nizatidine IR 150 mg bid were similar overall during the 0- to 14-hour and 14- to 24-hour dosing intervals. For the 14- to 24-hour dosing interval, nizatidine CR 150 mg maintained gastric pH over 3.0 and 4.0 for 42% and 27% of the time compared to 39% and 23% for nizatidine IR, respectively. Nizatidine CR 300 mg, compared to the 150-mg CR and IR regimens, had a greater effect on increasing evening intragastric pH, thus providing support for the potential utility of nizatidine CR 300 mg dosed at night in alleviating nocturnal symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

The effects of the histamine H(2)-receptor antagonists (H(2)-antagonists), ranitidine, nizatidine, cimetidine and famotidine, on plasma levels of gastrointestinal peptides, calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), substance P (SP), and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) was investigated with respect to regulation of gastric mucosal blood flow, in healthy volunteers. H(2)-Antagonists or placebo was orally administered to five healthy male volunteers. Venous blood samples were taken before and after drug administration. The levels of plasma gastrointestinal peptides were determined by enzyme immunoassay. The administration of ranitidine and nizatidine caused significant increases in plasma CGRP and SP levels at 30 to 120 min compared with the placebo group. Peak plasma CGRP levels (39.8+/-3.1 and 40.6+/-3.6 pg mL(-1)) were achieved 60 min after administration of ranitidine and nizatidine, respectively. Maximum plasma SP levels (21.3+/-5.2 and 22.8+/-4.2 pg mL(-1)) were reached 60 min after administration of ranitidine and nizatidine, respectively. However, all H(2)-antagonists did not alter the levels of VIP. The released CGRP and SP by ranitidine and nizatidine administration may produce a gastroprotective effect, increase mucosal blood flow, and inhibit acid secretion in the gastrointestinal tract.

Study Objective: To investigate the effect of histamine2 (H2)-receptor antagonist-induced elevation of gastric pH on oral bioavailability of a single dose of dapsone 100 mg., Design: Prospective, randomized, crossover, open-label, single-dose pharmacokinetic study., Setting: Teaching hospital., Patients: Sixteen men were enrolled in the study; data from 11 subjects were evaluable., Interventions: Participants received two treatments separated by at least 14 days. Treatment A consisted of a single dose of dapsone 100 mg. Treatment B consisted of a single dose of dapsone 100 mg plus two doses of oral nizatidine 300 mg administered 3-4 hours apart to maintain gastric pH above 6.0. Plasma samples collected before and up to 120 hours after dapsone administration were analyzed for dapsone and monoacetyldapsone (MADDS) by high-performance liquid chromatography. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined by noncompartmental analysis., Measurements and Main Results: Gastric pH in the first 6 hours after dapsone administration was above 6.0 for a mean +/- SD of 1.1% +/- 2.9% of the time in the absence of nizatidine and 69.5% +/- 18.0% of the time during nizatidine therapy. The geometric mean dapsone maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) declined by 13% (p<0.01), and median time to Cmax occurred 2 hours later (p<0.01) with nizatidine coadministration compared with dapsone alone. Inclusion of the 90% confidence interval for the mean Cmax ratio within the equivalence interval of 0.8-1.25 demonstrated the lack of clinical significance for this modest decrease in Cmax. Neither the area under the dapsone plasma concentration-time curve from zero to infinity nor the elimination half-life of dapsone were significantly altered by nizatidine. No clinically significant changes were observed in the pharmacokinetics of MADDS with regard to coadministration of nizatidine., Conclusion: Elevation of gastric pH by H2-receptor antagonists, such as nizatidine, does not result in clinically important changes in the rate or extent of oral dapsone absorption.

The effect of the histamine H2-receptor antagonist, nizatidine, on plasma concentrations of paracetamol has been investigated with respectto hepatic metabolism. Paracetamol (1000 mg) together with 300 or 150 mg nizatidine or placebo was orally administered to five healthy male volunteers. Venous blood samples were taken before and after administration. Plasma paracetamol and paracetamol conjugates (glucuronide and sulfate) were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. The pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated from the plasma paracetamol concentration-time curves of each volunteer. The plasma nizatidine concentration was highest (2420.0+/-192.4 and 996.0+/-54.6 ng mL(-1)) in the sample taken 1 h after administration of 300 mg nizatidine (high dose) and 150mg nizatidine (low dose), respectively. Plasma paracetamol concentrations with nizatidine (high and low doses) were increased significantly at 45-120 min and 45-60 min, respectively, compared with placebo. The total area under the plasma paracetamol concentration-time curve from 0 to 180 min (2361.5+/-146.4 and 2085.75+/-73.5 microg min mL(-1)) significantly increased after coadministration of nizatidine (high and low doses), respectively (P < 0.01 vs placebo). Paracetamol glucuronide concentrations with nizatidine (high and low doses) were decreased significantly at 30-45 min and 30 min, respectively, compared with placebo. However, plasma paracetamol sulfate concentrations with nizatidine (high and low doses) were not significantly altered. The coadministration of nizatidine (150 and 300 mg) dose-dependently reduces plasma paracetamol glucuronide concentrations and increases plasma paracetamol concentrations. The effects of nizatidine could result from the inhibition of glucuronyltransferase. Thus, care is necessary when paracetamol and nizatidine are coadministered.

Treatment failures are common in patients infected with metronidazole-resistant Helicobacter pylori in the gastric mucosa when triple therapy including metronidazole is used. In patients with treatment failure and metronidazole-resistant H. pylori, a higher eradication rate for H. pylori was found after secondary treatment with bismuth/ranitidine in combination with antibiotics including metronidazole, compared with the same antibiotics combined with a standard dose of omeprazole. This agrees with our previous finding that bismuth was able to reduce the susceptibility of H. pylori to metronidazole. In this study, we have found that nizatidine, an H(2)-receptor antagonist, is also able to reduce the susceptibility of H. pylori to metronidazole in vitro, despite having no direct inhibitory effect on the growth of H. pylori. This agrees with earlier findings that compounds having the ability to reverse antibiotic resistance do not necessarily have an antibiotic or chemotherapeutic effect in the sense of growth inhibition. Therefore, it was decided to investigate the effect of nizatidine and omeprazole on the oxidative respiratory chain, as it is known that metronidazole is able to inhibit the activity of fumarate reductase of H. pylori. This enzyme is a key enzyme in the alternative respiratory chain under anaerobic conditions. Nizatidine was, in these preliminary experiments, found to inhibit fumarate reductase in a dose-dependent way, like metronidazole, whereas omeprazole had almost no effect on fumarate reductase. No other significant effects on the enzymes of the respiratory chain were found. The synergistic effect of nizatidine on metronidazole resistant H. pylori strains could be explained by the effect on fumarate reductase, whereas the effect of omeprazole is different and could be an inhibition of a proton pump in H. pylori. Reversal of antimicrobial resistance with the help of different non-antibiotics seems to be possible by using quite different compounds, and is therefore to be explained by different molecular mechanisms.

Background: Salivation plays an important role in the defence of the oesophageal mucosa against gastric acidic reflux and can be evoked by cholinergic stimulation. Both nizatidine and cisapride have been reported to increase acetylcholine concentrations in the cholinergic system., Aim: To investigate the effect of nizatidine and cisapride on salivary secretion, salivary epidermal growth factor and bicarbonate output., Methods: The salivary volume and concentration of salivary epidermal growth factor and bicarbonate were measured after the administration of nizatidine (150 mg), famotidine (20 mg) and cisapride (5 mg) in 30 male healthy volunteers., Results: Basal and stimulated salivary secretions were found to be increased after the administration of nizatidine and cisapride. In contrast, salivary secretion was not increased by famotidine. Although epidermal growth factor content was not augmented, nizatidine and cisapride administration also increased the bicarbonate output in mastication-stimulated saliva., Conclusions: Increased salivary secretion and bicarbonate output induced by nizatidine may be useful for the treatment of patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Animal studies demonstrate that nizatidine, an H2-receptor inhibitor, may enhance colonic activity independent of its effect on acid secretion. The effect of nizatidine on human colonic motility is unknown. We evaluated the potential prokinetic property of nizatidine in 12 healthy subjects (10 men and 2 women, age 21-46 years). Each subject received either nizatidine (600 mg), famotidine (80 mg, a H2-receptor inhibitor used as a control), or a placebo, on separate days in randomized order at least 3 days apart. Following an overnight fast, a three-lumen catheter fitted with a stimulus balloon and two barostat bags was placed in the descending colon. The gastrocolonic response was tested by antral balloon inflation and the colonic peristaltic reflex was evaluated by colonic distension. Changes in colonic motility were assessed by volume changes in the barostat bags. Antral distension evoked volume-dependent increases in colonic motility, maximal at a 300-ml inflation, as demonstrated by a reduced bag volume. Nizatidine enhanced colonic motility in response to antral distension at 200 and 300 ml, compared with famotidine and placebo. Colonic distension evoked volume-dependent increases in colonic motility proximal to the stimulus balloon. Compared with famotidine and placebo, nizatidine enhanced the ascending and descending contractile limbs of the peristaltic reflex but did not affect relaxation distal to the balloon. In conclusion, nizatidine enhanced the gastrocolonic response and the colonic peristaltic reflex in healthy subjects. Further research on the prokinetic action of nizatidine in the colon may lead to novel treatments for idiopathic constipation.

Nizatidine, a histamine H(2)-antagonist, is known to inhibit acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity and is used clinically as a gastroprokinetic agent as well as the anti-ulcer agent. We examined whether or not nizatidine stimulates duodenal HCO(3)(-) secretion in rats through vagal-cholinergic mechanisms by inhibiting AChE activity. Under pentobarbital anesthesia, a proximal duodenal loop was perfused with saline, and the HCO(3)(-) secretion was measured at pH 7.0 using a pH-stat method and by adding 10 mM HCl. Nizatidine, neostigmine, carbachol, famotidine or ranitidine was administered i.v. as a single injection. Intravenous administration of nizatidine (3-30 mg/kg) dose-dependently increased the HCO(3)(-) secretion, and the effect at 10 mg/kg was equivalent to that obtained by carbachol at 0.01 mg/kg. The HCO(3)(-) stimulatory action of nizatidine was observed at the doses that inhibited the histamine-induced acid secretion and enhanced gastric motility. This effect was mimicked by neostigmine (0.03 mg/kg) and significantly attenuated by bilateral vagotomy and pretreatment with atropine but not indomethacin. The IC(50) of nizatidine for AChE of rat erythrocytes was 1.4 x 10(-6) M, about 12 times higher than that of neostigmine. Ranitidine showed the anti-AchE activity and increased duodenal HCO(3)(-) secretion, similar to nizatidine, whereas famotidine had any influence on neither AChE activity nor the HCO(3)(-) secretion. On the other hand, duodenal damage induced by acid perfusion (100 mM HCl for 4 h) in the presence of indomethacin was significantly prevented by nizatidine and neostigmine, at the doses that increased the HCO(3)(-) secretion. These results suggest that nizatidine increases HCO(3)(-) secretion in the rat duodenum, mediated by vagal-cholinergic mechanism, the action being associated with the anti-AChE activity of this agent.

1. The inhibitory effects of cimetidine, nizatidine and omeprazole on the metabolic activity of CYP2C9, 2C19, 2D6 and 3A were investigated in human liver microsomes. Both cimetidine and omeprazole inhibited each of the CYP subfamily enzymes; in particular, omeprazole extensively inhibited the hydroxylation of S-mephenytoin (CYP2C19, Ki = 7.1 microM). Nizatidine exhibited no inhibition of any of the CYP isoforms examined. 2. Cimetidine inhibited the hydroxylation of tolbutamide but not of diclofenac, whereas omeprazole inhibited the hydroxylation of diclofenac but not that of tolbutamide. The ability to inhibit CYP2C9 varied with incubation time, as measured by the metabolic rate constant for the substrates. Therefore, suitable substrates and incubation times must be selected in inhibition studies examining metabolic clearance and the mechanism of inhibition of these drugs. 3. Nizatidine did not inhibit the metabolism of cisapride, glibenclamide, benidipine and simvastatin. Omeprazole inhibited the metabolism of cisapride (Ki = 0.4 microM), glibenclamide (11.7 microM) and benidipine (6.5 microM), whereas cimetidine inhibited the metabolism of glibenclamide (11.6 microM). To avoid drug-drug interactions, care needs to be taken to select suitable medicines for co-administration with anti-ulcer drugs.

Background: Olanzapine is temporally associated, in a number of patients with schizophrenia, with weight gain. H(2) antagonists, like nizatidine, have been shown to control appetite in overweight patients., Methods: A patient with olanzapine temporally associated weight gain was treated with nizatidine as "add-on" therapy., Results: Nizatidine treatment was associated with good control and subsequent reduction of weight after 4 to 5 weeks of therapy in a patient with repetitive episodes of weight gain during olanzapine treatment. Olanzapine was otherwise well tolerated and effective in controlling psychopathology., Conclusions: H(2) antagonist treatment with olanzapine may be a valid medical strategy in preventing and/or reducing weight gain in patients with schizophrenia. Controlled studies are recommended to confirm this observation.

Nizatidine, a new H2-receptor antagonist, has been reported to inhibit acetylcholinesterase activity. This could lead to an interaction with neuromuscular blocking drugs. This study examined the effects of nizatidine on the actions of vecuronium. Oral nizatidine has been reported to be an effective protective agent against acid aspiration syndrome, and we reevaluated this effect. The control group (n = 10) received a placebo with water 50 ml and the nizatidine group (n = 10) received nizatidine 300 mg with water 50 ml two hours before arrival in the operating room. Gastric contents were aspirated and the volume and pH measured before induction of anaesthesia. Anaesthesia was induced in all patients with thiopentone 5 mg/kg and 1.5% isoflurane in 98.5% oxygen followed by vecuronium 0.1 mg/kg. Vecuronium onset time and duration time 25 (time from injection until recovery of 25% of vaseline twitch amplitude) were obtained using electromyography. There were no significant differences between the two groups in vecuronium onset time or duration time 25. Gastric fluid volume was greater and gastric pH was lower in the control group than in the nizatidine group. 70% of the control group and none of the nizatidine group (P < 0.005) had a gastric content pH < 2.5 or volume > 25 ml.

The present study was undertaken to clarify a prokinetic activity of nizatidine (CAS 76963-41-2) during the digestive state as well as gastric emptying of a solid test meal in comparison with cimetidine (CAS 51481-61-9), famotidine (CAS 76842-35-6) and cisapride (CAS 81098-60-4). Intravenous administration of nizatidine (0.3-3 mg/kg) enhanced the motility of the gastric antrum and duodenum during the digestive state. With cimetidine (1-10 mg/kg) and famotidine (0.1-1 mg/kg) enhancement of gastric motility was observed only with the highest dose of cimetidine, and famotidine had no effect. Marked enhancement of gastric motility was observed with cisapride (0.1-0.5 mg/kg). After intraduodenal administration of nizatidine (10 and 20 mg/kg) and cisapride (0.25 and 0.5 mg/kg), they also amplified the contractile activity of the gastric antrum. Gastric emptying of a solid test meal was accelerated by intraperitoneal administration of nizatidine (1-10 mg/kg) to the same extent as cisapride (0.1-1 mg/kg). In addition, even in a model of delayed gastric emptying induced by clonidine, nizatidine, like cisapride, improved the rate of gastric emptying. Neither cimetidine (3-30 mg/kg) nor famotidine (0.3-3 mg/kg) affected the gastric emptying of a solid meal or delayed gastric emptying. These results suggest that nizatidine enhanced gastric motility even during the digestive state, and accelerated gastric emptying of a solid meal, similar to cisapride. Furthermore, nizatidine improved clonidine-induced delayed gastric emptying. These prokinetic activities of nizatidine may by useful for the treatment of abdominal symptoms due to dysmotility and delayed gastric emptying in patients with gastritis and non-ulcer dyspepsia (NUD). In comparison with famotidine and cimetidine, nizatidine may be different from other histamine H2-receptor antagonists and has unique properties other than its gastric antisecretory activity.

A disorder of gastric motility should be suspected in patients with chronic vomiting. Imaging studies are used to confirm delayed gastric emptying, the most common form of a gastric motility disorder. Other causes of chronic vomiting, for example, metabolic or endocrine disorders, other abdominal disorders, mechanical causes of gastric obstruction, and lower gastrointestinal tract disease, are then ruled out. If no underlying cause is determined, a functional disorder of gastric emptying is presumptively diagnosed. Treatment consists of dietary management and gastric prokinetic agents. Cisapride is the drug of choice for treating delayed gastric emptying followed by erythromycin and ranitidine or nizatidine.

The proton pump inhibitors omeprazole and lansoprazole and the histamine H2 receptor antagonists ranitidine and nizatidine were investigated for their effects on gastric transmucosal potential difference (PD) in the rat, in comparison with the gastroprotective compound sucralfate. Omeprazole (1-3 mg kg-1, i.v.) and lansoprazole (1-3 mg kg-1, i.v.) did not modify basal PD, but significantly reduced (by approx. 50-60%) the drop in PD caused by intragastric administration of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA, 60 mg kg-1). Ranitidine (3-100 mg kg-1, i.v.) and nizatidine (10-30 mg kg-1, i.v.) behaved similarly to proton pump inhibitors, being ineffective on basal PD, while significantly reducing the effect of ASA. The antisecretory compounds did not change basal pH values. Sucralfate (0.5-1.5 g kg-1 intragastrically) caused a slight increase (approx. 20%) of basal PD and a dose-dependent reduction of ASA-induced fall in PD, with a maximum effect (65% reduction) comparable to that caused by the antisecretory agents. These results showed that ASA-induced disruption of the mucosal barrier can be reduced to the same extent by various antiulcer drugs, irrespective of their effects on gastric acid secretion.

Although thrombocytopenia associated with the use of histamine H2 receptor (H2R) antagonists has been described, a drug-dependent, platelet-reactive antibody has not previously been identified in such cases. We studied serum from a patient who developed acute, severe thrombocytopenia after exposure to the H2 receptor antagonist, ranitidine, and identified an antibody that reacted with normal platelets in the presence of this drug at pharmacologic concentrations. In flow cytometric and immunoprecipitation studies, the antibody was shown to be specific for the glycoprotein Ib/IX complex (GPIb/IX). From the pattern of monoclonal antibody (MoAb) inhibition and the reactions of antibody with Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells transfected with GPIX and GPIbbeta, we found that the patient's antibody is specific for an epitope on GPIX close to, or identical with a site recognized by the MoAb SZ1 that is a common target for antibodies induced by quinine and quinidine, drugs structurally unrelated to ranitidine. These findings provide evidence that immune thrombocytopenia can be caused by sensitivity to an H2 R antagonist and suggest that the SZ1 binding site on GPIX may be a common target for drug-induced antibodies. Further studies of the epitope for which SZ1 is specific may provide clues to the mechanism(s) by which drugs promote tight binding of antibody to a membrane glycoprotein and cause platelet destruction in patients with drug sensitivity.

Objective: To determine the effect, if any, of histamine type 2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) on serum alcohol levels under various conditions including type of H2RA receptor antagonist, alcohol dose, and fed status of the subject., Study Design: Meta-analysis of the published literature., Data Sources: Studies were identified by MEDLINE (January 1982 through December 1997) using the key words H2 receptor antagonists and alcohol. Other studies were identified by reviewing bibliographies of retrieved articles and by discussion with colleagues., Study Selection: Studies were selected if they involved the coadministration of H2RAs and alcohol in healthy, human volunteers. Studies that may have addressed this goal but were performed in another context, for instance the measurement of ulcer healing, were excluded., Data Extraction: Data were extracted on the design, number of participants, participant characteristics, type and dose of H2RA administered, serum alcohol levels (measured as Cmax) along with standard deviations, dose of alcohol received, and fed or fasted status of participants. Alcohol dose was arbitrarily divided into low dose (< or = 0.5 g/kg body weight) versus high dose (> 0.5 g/kg body weight). In addition, studies involving ranitidine and cimetidine were stratified by sample size into small (n < or = 10) versus not small (n > 10)., Measurements and Main Results: Twenty-four trials met selection criteria. Small elevations in Cmax were noted when cimetidine (2.71 mg/DL; 95% confidence internal [CI] 1.60, 3.83) or ranitidine (6.95 mg/DL; 95% CI 5.83, 8.08) were coadministered with alcohol. No such differences were noted for famotidine (0.28 mg/DL; 95% CI -1.24, 1.80) or nizatidine (2.33 mg/DL;, 95% CI -0.06, 4.72). The elevation detected with cimetidine and ranitidine was most pronounced in smaller studies (n < 10). Separate analyses investigating the effect of alcohol dose and fed or fasted status of participants revealed no clinically important differences., Conclusions: Cimetidine and ranitidine, but not the other H2RAs, can cause small elevations of serum alcohol level when alcohol and drug are administered concurrently. Studies with larger numbers of participants were less likely to demonstrate this effect. Relative to accepted, legal definitions of intoxication, the effect of any H2RA on blood alcohol level is unlikely to be clinically relevant.

Background and Objectives: During laparoscopy, the increase of the carbon dioxide tension may increase the synthesis of hydrochloric acid in the parietal cells of the stomach; the source of the secreted hydrogen ions is carbonic acid derived from the hydration of carbon dioxide. The present report tests this hypothesis by correlating the changes of end-tidal PCO2 (ETCO2) with the pH of the gastric juice in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy., Methods: 40 adult patients were investigated: 20 controls, and 20 patients receiving 100 mg nizatidine intravenously, prior to surgery. In both groups, the ETCO2 was measured by capnography and the pH of the gastric juice was monitored before carbon dioxide insufflation and at the end of laparoscopy prior to carbon dioxide deflation., Results: In the control group, the ETCO2 increased following carbon dioxide insufflation from a mean basal value of 30.2 (standard deviation [SD] 4.6) mm Hg to 41.1 (SD 9.5) mm Hg, while the mean pH of the gastric juice decreased significantly from 1.9 (SD 0.4) to 1.27 (SD 0.43). There was a significant negative correlation between the ETCO2 and pH of the gastric juice (r = -0.4). In the Nizatidine group, the ETCO2 also increased following carbon dioxide insufflation from a mean basal value of 30.9 (SD 3.0) mm Hg to 39.4 (SD 5.3) mm Hg. However, in contrast with the control group, the mean pH of the gastric juice did not decrease, but paradoxically increased from 1.68 (SD 0.36) to 3.6 (SD 1.02)., Conclusions: During laparoscopy, the pH of the gastric juice is significantly decreased. This decrease is inversely related to the increase of ETCO2. The preoperative administration of the selective H2-blocker nizatidine can prevent the increase in gastric acidity and can result in a paradoxical increase of pH of the gastric juice.

To quantitatively evaluate drug-drug interactions involving metabolic processes in the liver, we attempted to predict the increasing ratio of the plasma concentration of midazolam (MDZ) in the presence of cimetidine (CIM) or nizatidine (NZD) in rats. Under steady-state conditions for the plasma concentration of CIM or NZD, MDZ was administered through the portal vein. The AUC of MDZ in the presence of CIM was 2.5-fold higher than that in the absence of CIM. There was no effect of NZD on the AUC of MDZ. The liver/plasma concentration ratios for CIM and NZD were 4.0 and 2.7, respectively. The estimated liver unbound concentration (CH,f)/plasma unbound concentration (Cp,f) ratios for CIM and NZD were 1.9 and 2.4, respectively, suggesting concentrative hepatic accumulation of both drugs. The oxidative metabolism of MDZ in rat liver microsomes was competitively inhibited by CIM or NZD, and the Ki values of CIM and NZD were 110 and 2600 microM, respectively. Based on these data obtained in vivo and in vitro, the increasing ratios for MDZ in the presence of CIM or NZD were predicted using the equations Rp = 1 + Cp,f/Ki and RH = 1 + CH,f/Ki. The observed increasing ratios in the presence of CIM were very close to RH, compared with Rp. However, Cp, f and CH,f were much less than Ki and there was no difference between Rp and RH in the presence of NZD. Consequently, Cp,f and CH, f were greater than or equal to Ki and Cp,f was not equal to CH,f, as in the presence of CIM, and it was indicated that CH,f was more suitable for quantitatively predicting the drug-drug interactions than was Cp,f.

Histamine type 2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) have been found to alter gastric motility. The aims of this study were to determine if H2RAs affect antral contractility in vitro and the mechanism of this effect. Guinea pig antral muscle strips were pinned in an organ bath after removing the mucosa, and circular muscle tension was measured using an isometric force transducer. Gastric myocytes were isolated from guinea pig stomach using collagenase digestion, and cell lengths were measured using an image analysis system. In muscle strips, ranitidine and nizatidine increased the amplitude of spontaneous phasic antral contractions in a concentration-dependent fashion with threshold concentrations of 5 microM. The order of potency for the H2RAs was ranitidine = nizatidine >> cimetidine > famotidine. The contractile effects of ranitidine and nizatidine were reduced, but not abolished, by tetrodotoxin and omega-conotoxin GVIA and nearly abolished by atropine. In isolated cells, ranitidine and nizatidine, but not famotidine or cimetidine, induced concentration-dependent cell shortening, with maximal shortening at 10 microM. These contractile effects of ranitidine and nizatidine in isolated cells were inhibited by atropine. Ranitidine and nizatidine increase antral contractility; this effect appears to be mediated by an interaction between ranitidine and nizatidine on cholinergic pathways with both direct effects on smooth muscle cholinergic receptors and indirect effects by increasing cholinergic neurotransmission.

The aim of the review is to evaluate the putative clinical interactions between alcohol metabolism and the administration of H2-receptor antagonists. Places of the first-pass metabolism of ethanol in the body have been investigated as well. According to the in vitro experimental results the H2-receptor antagonists can inhibit the ethanol metabolism which may have clinical relevance. When low doses of alcohol (below 0.3 g/kg) are given per os, the administration of H2-receptor antagonists results in an increase in the blood ethanol concentrations. Since that challenged increase never exceeds the level of 0.3/1000 blood alcohol concentration, it has hardly any clinical or medico-legal significance.

Nizatidine, a new histamine-2-receptor antagonist, stimulates gastrointestinal motility in dogs and gastric emptying of liquids in rats. Effect of nizatidine on gastric emptying of a solid meal was investigated using a novel gastric emptying model in rats. Male Wistar rats (weighing 200-300 g) were supplied with powdered food containing 30 w/w% barium 14 hr before the beginning of the experiment and x-ray photography of rat stomach was taken under light ether anesthesia. Gastric emptying was assessed by percentage of a decrease in area 30 min after drug was injected intraperitoneally. There was a positive correlation between the area of the gastric outline and the weight of the gastric contents (r = 0.94, P < 0.01). Ether anesthesia itself did not affect gastric emptying. Nizatidine increased gastric emptying dose-dependently (emptied percentage; vehicle: 4.9 +/- 1.5%, 1 mg/kg: 7.2 +/- 0.4%, 3 mg/kg: 10.4 +/- 2.0%, 10 mg/kg: 16.7 +/- 4.9%, 30 mg/kg: 25.7 +/- 7.4%). N-Desmethyl nizatidine (NDM) also stimulated gastric emptying, but nizatidine S-oxide, cimetidine, an famotidine had no significant effects on gastric emptying. Nizatidine and neostigmine, but not NDM, at a subthreshold dose accelerated gastric emptying treated with a low dose of acetylcholine (0.1 mg/kg). Atropine (2 mg/kg, -30 min) did not modulate the gastroprokinetic action of nizatidine, but blocked that of NDM. These findings suggest that this noninvasive method may allow measurement of gastric emptying of solids accurately and that nizatidine and NDM facilitate gastric emptying probably mediated by a direct and/or an indirect (acetylcholinesterase inhibition) cholinergic mechanism.

In order to achieve possible greater therapeutic efficacy, ranitidine 300 mg bid (R2) may be given rather than 300 mg qhs (R1), or nizatidine 300 mg bid (N2) may be given rather than 300 mg qhs (N1). A randomized placebo-controlled crossover study was performed in six healthy volunteers (four males, two females) who ranged in age from 23 to 43 years, comparing R1, R2, N1 and N2 versus placebo (P), measuring 24 h intragastric pH by the aspiration technique, gastric juice pepsin and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) concentrations, as well as serum gastrin concentrations. In all treatment groups, 24-h intragastric pH was higher than with P; the 24 h and daytime (0800-2200 h) pH was higher with N2 than with N1, but not with R2 versus R1. The percentage pH > or = 3 was greater with N2 than with N1 during the daytime. Night-time (2200-0800 h) and 24 h pepsin concentrations were higher in R2 than in R1, were similar in N1 and N2, and were lower in these treatment groups than in P. The gastric juice PGE2 concentration at night-time, but not at daytime, was increased in the four treatment groups compared with P. Despite the higher pH values at night-time in the treatment groups, the night-time concentrations of serum gastrin were unchanged, and yet during the daytime the higher values of pH were associated with increased gastrin concentrations when R2 or N2 were given, but not with R1 and N1. There was a negative correlation between intragastric juice pH and pepsin concentration during the daytime, and a positive correlation between pH and PGE2 concentration during the night-time. The slopes and y-axis intercepts between pH and pepsin or PGE2 concentrations differed between the placebo and the treatment groups, suggesting that these H2-receptor antagonists may have an effect on lowering pepsin and raising PGE2 concentrations in addition to their effects on pH. As the percentage of time over the 24 h period and night-time periods when the pH was greater than 3 was not different between ranitidine and nizatidine, the two regimens will likely have similar clinical efficacy.

Cimetidine, an H2-receptor antagonist, is one of the most commonly prescribed drugs in the world. It has been reported to increase blood alcohol concentrations in drinking individuals. To determine if this increase could be due to inhibition of alcohol dehydrogenase activity, the effect of the drug on ethanol oxidation by gastric sigma sigma alcohol dehydrogenase and liver beta 2 beta 2, pi pi, and chi chi alcohol dehydrogenase isoenzymes was observed. Cimetidine inhibited all isoenzymes studied except chi chi; the chi chi isoenzyme showed no inhibition up to 5 mM cimetidine. Inhibition of the alcohol dehydrogenase isoenzymes by the H2-receptor antagonists nizatidine, ranitidine, and famotidine was negligible. Docking simulations with the beta 2.NAD+.4-iodopyrazole X-ray structure indicated that cimetidine fit well into the substrate binding site. The substitution on the thiazole ring of nizatidine, however, prevented docking into the binding site. Cimetidine inhibition of ethanol oxidation by sigma sigma and beta 2 beta 2 was competitive with varied ethanol, exhibiting Ki values of 2.8 +/- 0.4 mM and 0.77 +/- 0.07 mM, respectively. Cimetidine inhibition of ethanol oxidation by pi pi was noncompetitive with varied ethanol (Ki = 0.50 +/- 0.03 mM). Inhibition of ethanol oxidation by sigma sigma and beta 2 beta 2 with varied NAD+ was competitive. These results, together with the cimetidine inhibition kinetics of acetaldehyde reduction by sigma sigma and beta 2 beta 2, with either varied NADH or varied acetaldehyde, are consistent with cimetidine binding to two enzyme species. These species are free enzyme and the productive enzyme.NAD+ complex.

We have studied the effect of oral nizatidine 6 mg kg-1 in total on preoperative gastric fluid pH and volume in children. One hundred and four healthy children, aged 4-11 yr, were allocated randomly to four groups (n = 26): placebo administered at 21:00 and 06:30 the night before and on the day of surgery, respectively (placebo-placebo: control); nizatidine 6 mg kg-1 at 21:00 and placebo at 06:30 (nizatidine-placebo); placebo at 21:00 and nizatidine 6 mg kg-1 at 06:30 (placebo-nizatidine); and nizatidine 3 mg kg-1 at 21:00 and 06:30 (nizatidine-nizatidine). Each child ingested a large volume of apple juice 3 h before estimated induction of anaesthesia. After induction of anaesthesia, pH and volume of gastric fluid obtained via an orogastric tube were measured. Mean pH in the placebo-nizatidine and nizatidine-nizatidine groups was significantly higher than that in the placebo-placebo group (5.7 (SEM 0.3), 6.0 (0.3) vs 1.8 (0.2), respectively) (P < 0.05). Mean pH in the nizatidine-placebo group was similar to that in the control group (2.3 (0.3) vs 1.8 (0.2)). The number of children with pH < 2.5 and volume > 0.4 ml kg-1 in the nizatidine-nizatidine (0%) and placebo-nizatidine (4%) groups was reduced compared with the control (46%) or nizatidine-placebo (38%) group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The H2-antagonists famotidine and nizatidine produced a dose-dependent inhibition of histamine release from human colonic mucosal and muscle mast cells stimulated with anti-IgE. The IC30 values were in the range 0.5-10 microM and the maximum inhibition approached 50%. The compounds showed similar efficacy against rat peritoneal mast cells but were more potent. The cytoprotectant misoprostol had a striking effect on the human colonic mast cells, producing more than 50% inhibition at concentrations of 0.1-1 nM, but was much less active against the rat cells.

There are conflicting data on the existence of significant first-pass metabolism of alcohol (ethanol) in the human stomach and its inhibition by histamine H2-receptor antagonists. Alcohol is predominantly metabolised in the liver by the microsomal alcohol oxidising system, alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) and a catalase enzyme. Histochemical and kinetic studies have revealed several ADH isoenzymes in the gastric mucosa with different kinetic properties. After small oral doses of alcohol first-pass metabolism in the stomach occurs, as shown by reduced area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) compared with intravenous or intraduodenal administration. The activity of gastric ADH is reduced in women, the elderly, Asian individuals, the fasting state, chronic alcoholism and after gastrectomy. The effect is only present with small (< or = 0.3 g/kg) alcohol doses and with a high alcohol concentration. In a number of studies, cimetidine in therapeutic doses over 7 days produced a significant increase in the AUC and in the peak plasma concentration after administration of alcohol 0.15 and 0.30 g/kg. This was related to an inhibition of gastric ADH activity, as shown by in vitro studies. Ranitidine inhibited gastric ADH to a similar extent on a molar basis, but its effect on alcohol levels in vivo was less constant in various studies. Nizatidine also reduced gastric alcohol first-pass metabolism, but famotidine and roxatidine did not show this effect. In other studies, H2-receptor antagonists did not change AUC and peak alcohol concentration. The controversy is not easy to resolve, since a number of the positive studies did not use a placebo-controlled, randomised, crossover design, while some of the negative studies did not exclude habitual alcohol consumers and included Oriental volunteers, although both groups have been shown to lack significant gastric ADH activity. In this case, when first-pass metabolism of alcohol does not exist, this by definition cannot be abolished by H2-antagonists. The inclusion of oral and intravenous dosage data of alcohol is mandatory to positively identify first-pass metabolism in any individuals. The significance of the effect of H2-antagonists on blood alcohol concentrations is minor. It only occurs in young, male, nonalcoholic, non-Asian individuals, and alcohol must be given in a small (social) dose, in a high concentration, and after meals. An increase in alcohol levels in predisposed patients during treatment with some H2-antagonists cannot be excluded, although the likelihood is small. Furthermore, carefully designed studies are needed to clarify fully the significance of this interaction.

The influence of varying concentrations of the H2-receptor antagonists nizatidine and ranitidine on the acetylcholine- and carbachol-induced contractures on the toad rectus abdominis muscle, as well as the possible interaction between the above H2-receptor antagonists and D-tubocurarine were studied. Nizatidine and ranitidine at a concentration of 3.2 x 10(-4) mol l-1 augmented, and at 3.2 x 10(-3) mol l-1 inhibited, the acetylcholine-induced contractures on the toad rectus abdominis muscle, while at concentrations from 3.2 x 10(-4) to 3.2 x 10(-3) mol l-1 they inhibited the carbachol-induced contractures, in a concentration-dependent manner. In addition, nizatidine and ranitidine at a concentration of 3.2 x 10(-4) mol l-1 reversed the D-tubocurarine blocking activity on the acetylcholine-induced contractures, but at a concentration of 3.2 x 10(-3) mol l-1 they augmented it. These findings provide evidence that the above H2-receptor antagonists produce either cholinesterase inhibition or neuromuscular blockade, depending on their concentration. Thus, the D-tubocurarine neuromuscular blocking activity is potentiated at high concentrations of nizatidine and ranitidine, while it is reversed at lower ones.

Three drug interactions of nizatidine and of other antisecretory agents were studied comparatively. First, the effects of nizatidine, cimetidine and ranitidine on the dispositional kinetics of theophylline were evaluated in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. Second, the effect of magnesium/aluminium hydroxide on the relative bioavailability of nizatidine, famotidine, cimetidine and ranitidine was evaluated in healthy volunteers. Finally, the effects of nizatidine and omeprazole on the dispositional kinetics of phenytoin were evaluated in healthy volunteers. Only cimetidine altered the steady-state kinetics of oral theophylline, slowing theophylline clearance by 25%. Each of the H2-receptor antagonists exhibited a modest decline in relative bioavailability when ingested with antacid. Antacid ingestion decreased the bioavailability of famotidine, ranitidine and cimetidine by 20-25%, and the bioavailability of nizatidine by 12%. Each of these effects was statistically significant. Finally, it was found that neither omeprazole nor nizatidine affected the single dose kinetics of phenytoin.

The antisecretory activity of nizatidine, an H2-receptor antagonist, has been extensively investigated in man both by quantitative acid secretory tests and by means of 24-h continuous ambulatory pH monitoring. Studies have shown that nizatidine is a potent inhibitor of basal, nocturnal and stimulated acid secretion. Particular modalities of nizatidine administration, such as early evening intake with supper or morning dosing, have been recently defined. Further studies are needed to clarify if rebound nocturnal acid hypersecretion may develop after abrupt withdrawal of nizatidine or if tolerance may develop during prolonged administration.

The effects of omeprazole (40 mg orally per day) and nizatidine (300 mg orally per day) on the disposition of phenytoin (4.5 mg kg(-1) p.o. single dose) were studied in 18 healthy, young adult males. Total and unbound plasma concentrations of phenytoin were measured for 48 h after each dose of phenytoin. Neither treatment altered the disposition kinetics of phenytoin, the hydroxylation of which is mediated specifically by cytochromes P450 of the 2C subfamily.

The medline database was applied to search all randomized clinical trials published from 1986 to 1992 concerning the use of Nizatidine, a powerful H2-antagonist, versus other treatments, including placebo, in the treatment of duodenal ulcer disease. Therapeutic efficacy of nizatidine is comparable to that of other H2-antagonists; with the use of meta-analysis, no significant differences were demonstrated, both in acute and long-term treatment of duodenal ulcer between nizatidine and ranitidine, but untoward side effects were less frequent with nizatidine than with ranitidine.

Effects of various histamine H2-receptor antagonists (H2-RA) on gastrointestinal motility and gastric emptying were investigated. Ranitidine, nizatidine and cimetidine dose dependently induced contractions over the entire gastrointestinal tract, and the order of their effects was ranitidine > nizatidine > cimetidine. Roxatidine or famotidine had no effects on motility of the gastrointestinal tract. Ranitidine and nizatidine also induced contractions during the postprandial period and facilitated gastric emptying, while cimetidine, roxatidine or famotidine did not influence gastric emptying. Since acid reduction is thought to be the most important element of the treatment of peptic ulcer and reflux esophagitis, it was inferred that administration of a H2-RA selected with consideration of its property of facilitating gastrointestinal motility is effective in the treatment of patients with abnormal gastrointestinal motility.