Search

Normal and aberrant cognitive functions are the result of the dynamic interplay between large‐scale neural circuits. Describing the nature of these interactions has been a challenging task yet important for neurodegenerative disease evolution. Fusing modern dynamic graph network theory techniques and control theory applied on complex brain networks creates a new framework for neurodegenerative disease research by determining disease evolution at the subject level, facilitating a predictive treatment response and revealing key mechanisms responsible for disease alterations. It has been shown that two types of controllability—the average and the modal controllability—are relevant for the mechanistic explanation of how the brain navigates between cognitive states. The average controllability favors highly connected areas which move the brain to easily reachable states, while the modal controllability favors weakly connected areas representative for difficult‐to‐reach states. We propose two different techniques to achieve these two types of controllability: a centrality measure based on a sensitivity analysis of the Laplacian matrix is employed to determine the average controllability, while graph distances form the basis of the modal controllability. The concepts of "choosing the best driver set" and "graph distances" are applied to measure the average controllability and the modal controllability, respectively. Based on these new techniques, we obtain important disease descriptors that visualize alterations in the disease trajectory by revealing densely connected hubs or sparser areas. Our results suggest that these two techniques can accurately describe the different node roles in controlling trajectories of brain networks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Executive functions are high-level cognitive processes involving abilities such as working memory/updating, set-shifting and inhibition. These complex cognitive functions are enabled by interactions among widely distributed cognitive networks, supported by white matter tracts. Executive impairment is frequent in neurological conditions affecting white matter; however, whether specific tracts are crucial for normal executive functions is unclear. We review causal and correlation evidence from studies that used direct electrical stimulation during awake surgery for gliomas, voxel-based and tract-based lesion-symptom mapping, and diffusion tensor imaging to explore associations between the integrity of white matter tracts and executive functions in healthy and impaired adults. The corpus callosum was consistently associated with all executive processes, notably its anterior segments. Both causal and correlation evidence showed prominent support of the superior longitudinal fasciculus to executive functions, notably to working memory. More specifically, strong evidence suggested that the second branch of the superior longitudinal fasciculus is crucial for all executive functions, especially for flexibility. Global results showed left lateralization for verbal tasks and right lateralization for executive tasks with visual demands. The frontal aslant tract potentially supports executive functions, however, additional evidence is needed to clarify whether its involvement in executive tasks goes beyond the control of language. Converging evidence indicates that a right-lateralized network of tracts connecting cortical and subcortical grey matter regions supports the performance of tasks assessing response inhibition, some suggesting a role for the right anterior thalamic radiation. Finally, correlation evidence suggests a role for the cingulum bundle in executive functions, especially in tasks assessing inhibition. We discuss these findings in light of current knowledge about the functional role of these tracts, descriptions of the brain networks supporting executive functions and clinical implications for individuals with brain tumours. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Model-based brain injury criteria can present higher potential to predict injury than global head kinematic parameters. Numerical head injury prediction tools are time consuming and require Finite Element (FE) skilled users. To address these difficulties, a deep learning technique was applied to an existing previously developed brain FE model for which an injury risk curve has been proposed in terms of maximum Von Mises stress to predict moderate diffuse axonal injury. A total of 4492 experimental head impacts coming from experimental helmet testing were considered as input for the analysis. Each input was expressed in terms of three linear accelerations and three angular velocities versus time, when the target metric was the time history Von Mises Stress ( vms) curve computed within the brain via the FE analysis. The architecture used for the Deep Learning (DL) model is the U-Net and four models based on it were evaluated. The dataset was split into three datasets dedicated for learning and testing. The quality of the DL models were assessed via the Maximum Absolute Error between FE and DL models computed brain maximum vms. Further, a regression analysis of brain response with both methods was conducted. The results demonstrated that deep learning methods can be applied in the context of brain response estimation when helmet assessment is considered without any FE computation, only by considering the 6 D head kinematic vs time demonstrating that the deep learning approach should be further developed for research and industrial applications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]