Search

Your search keyword '"Nolsoe C.P."' showing total 12 results
Start Over Author "Nolsoe C.P."
12 results on '"Nolsoe C.P."'

2. EUS Needle Identification Comparison and Evaluation study (with videos)

Author

Tang, S.J., Vilmann, A.S., Saftoiu, A., Wang, W., Streba, C.T., Fink, P.P., Griswold, M., Wu, R., Dietrich, C.F., Jenssen, C., Hocke, M., Kantowski, M., Pohl, J., Fockens, P., Annema, J.T., Heijden, E. van der, Havre, R.F., Pham, K.D., Kunda, R., Deprez, P.H., Mariana, J., Vazquez-Sequeiros, E., Larghi, A., Buscarini, E., Fusaroli, P., Lahav, M., Puri, R., Garg, P.K., Sharma, M., Maluf-Filho, F., Sahai, A., Brugge, W.R., Lee, L.S., Aslanian, H.R., Wang, A.Y., Shami, V.M., Markowitz, A., Siddiqui, A.A., Mishra, G., Scheiman, J.M., Isenberg, G., Siddiqui, U.D., Shah, R.J., Buxbaum, J., Watson, R.R., Willingham, F.F., Bhutani, M.S., Levy, M.J., Harris, C., Wallace, M.B., Nolsoe, C.P., Lorentzen, T., Bang, N., Sorensen, S.M., Gilja, O.H., D'Onofrio, M., Piscaglia, F., Gritzmann, N., Radzina, M., Sparchez, Z.A., Sidhu, P.S., Freeman, S., McCowan, T.C., Araujo, C.R., Jr. de, Patel, A., Ali, M.A., Campbell, G., Chen, E., Vilmann, P., Tang, S.J., Vilmann, A.S., Saftoiu, A., Wang, W., Streba, C.T., Fink, P.P., Griswold, M., Wu, R., Dietrich, C.F., Jenssen, C., Hocke, M., Kantowski, M., Pohl, J., Fockens, P., Annema, J.T., Heijden, E. van der, Havre, R.F., Pham, K.D., Kunda, R., Deprez, P.H., Mariana, J., Vazquez-Sequeiros, E., Larghi, A., Buscarini, E., Fusaroli, P., Lahav, M., Puri, R., Garg, P.K., Sharma, M., Maluf-Filho, F., Sahai, A., Brugge, W.R., Lee, L.S., Aslanian, H.R., Wang, A.Y., Shami, V.M., Markowitz, A., Siddiqui, A.A., Mishra, G., Scheiman, J.M., Isenberg, G., Siddiqui, U.D., Shah, R.J., Buxbaum, J., Watson, R.R., Willingham, F.F., Bhutani, M.S., Levy, M.J., Harris, C., Wallace, M.B., Nolsoe, C.P., Lorentzen, T., Bang, N., Sorensen, S.M., Gilja, O.H., D'Onofrio, M., Piscaglia, F., Gritzmann, N., Radzina, M., Sparchez, Z.A., Sidhu, P.S., Freeman, S., McCowan, T.C., Araujo, C.R., Jr. de, Patel, A., Ali, M.A., Campbell, G., Chen, E., and Vilmann, P.

Abstract

Item does not contain fulltext, BACKGROUND AND AIMS: EUS-guided FNA or biopsy sampling is widely practiced. Optimal sonographic visualization of the needle is critical for image-guided interventions. Of the several commercially available needles, bench-top testing and direct comparison of these needles have not been done to reveal their inherent echogenicity. The aims are to provide bench-top data that can be used to guide clinical applications and to promote future device research and development. METHODS: Descriptive bench-top testing and comparison of 8 commonly used EUS-FNA needles (all size 22 gauge): SonoTip Pro Control (Medi-Globe); Expect Slimline (Boston Scientific); EchoTip, EchoTip Ultra, EchoTip ProCore High Definition (Cook Medical); ClearView (Conmed); EZ Shot 2 (Olympus); and BNX (Beacon Endoscopic), and 2 new prototype needles, SonoCoat (Medi-Globe), coated by echogenic polymers made by Encapson. Blinded evaluation of standardized and unedited videos by 43 EUS endoscopists and 17 radiologists specialized in GI US examination who were unfamiliar with EUS needle devices. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the ratings and rankings of these needles between endosonographers and radiologists. Overall, 1 prototype needle was rated as the best, ranking 10% to 40% higher than all other needles (P < .01). Among the commercially available needles, the EchoTip Ultra needle and the ClearView needle were top choices. The EZ Shot 2 needle was ranked statistically lower than other needles (30%-75% worse, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: All FNA needles have their inherent and different echogenicities, and these differences are similarly recognized by EUS endoscopists and radiologists. Needles with polymeric coating from the entire shaft to the needle tip may offer better echogenicity.

Published
2016

3. Contrast kinetics of the malignant breast tumour - border versus centre enhancement on dynamic midfield MRI

Author

Marklund, M., Torp-Pedersen, S., Bentzon, N., Thomsen, C., Roslind, A., Nolsoe, C.P., Marklund, M., Torp-Pedersen, S., Bentzon, N., Thomsen, C., Roslind, A., and Nolsoe, C.P.

Abstract

PURPOSE: To quantify the border versus centre enhancement of malignant breast tumours on dynamic magnetic resonance mammography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-two women diagnosed with primary breast cancer underwent dynamic magnetic resonance mammography (Omniscan 0.2 mmol/kg bodyweight) on a midfield scanner (0.6 T), prior to surgery. The following five variables were recorded from the border and centre regions of the tumours: Early Enhancement, Time to Peak, Wash-in rate, Wash-out rate and Area under Curve. Information on histology type, oestrogen and progesterone receptor status was collected. Statistical analysis was performed in SAS 9.1 as paired samples t-tests. RESULTS: Fifty of 52 malignant tumours displayed a faster Early Enhancement in the border region compared to the centre (p<0.0001). Significant differences between the border and centre values were found for Time to Peak, Wash-in rate, Wash-out rate and Area under Curve. Hormone receptor positive tumours displayed an over-all highly significant difference between border and centre enhancement, whereas no significant differences for any of the five variables were recorded in neither oestrogen nor progesterone hormone receptor negative tumours. CONCLUSION: The border/centre enhancement difference in malignant breast tumours is easily visualized on midfield dynamic magnetic resonance mammography. The dynamic behaviour is significantly correlated to histological features and receptor status of the tumours Udgivelsesdato: 2008/2

Published
2008

8. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound: Development of Syllabus for Core Theoretical and Practical Competencies

Author

Ole Graumann, Christian Pállson Nolsøe, Fabio Piscaglia, Niels Jacobsen, Odd Helge Gilja, Christian B. Laursen, Christoph F. Dietrich, Lars Konge, Paul S. Sidhu, Jacobsen N., Nolsoe C.P., Konge L., Graumann O., Dietrich C.F., Sidhu P.S., Piscaglia F., Gilja O.H., and Laursen C.B.

Subjects
Medical education, Acoustics and Ultrasonics, Delphi Technique, Computer science, Biophysics, Delphi method, Contrast Media, 030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging, Syllabus, 03 medical and health sciences, Delphi proce, 0302 clinical medicine, Humans, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging, Curriculum, computer.programming_language, Ultrasonography, 030219 obstetrics & reproductive medicine, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Core competency, Competency assessment, Delphi process, Clinical Competence, computer, Contrast-enhanced ultrasound, Delphi
Abstract

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is dependent on the observer's competencies, and thus, appropriate education and testing of individual competency is essential. The current international curriculum in CEUS is methodologically weak and lacks validated competency assessment tests. In this study, we aimed to develop a syllabus for core competencies in CEUS using the Delphi process and an international panel of experts. A core writing group constructed an initial draft of the syllabus based on the existing literature. Eight international experts in CEUS or medical education were recruited as Delphi panelists. The draft underwent iterative and anonymous Delphi rounds until a pre-defined level of consensus was reached. The final syllabus consisted of 16 items, which were indexed in two main domains and in procedural order. An expert-generated proposal for a syllabus of core CEUS competencies has been constructed via the Delphi process and may serve as framework for future development of a CEUS curriculum, including competency assessment tests.

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

9. Guidelines and Good Clinical Practice Recommendations for Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the Liver-Update 2020 WFUMB in Cooperation with EFSUMB, AFSUMB, AIUM, and FLAUS

Author

Nitin Chaubal, Maria Franca Meloni, Ioan Sporea, Peter N. Burns, Masatoshi Kudo, Xin-Wu Cui, Christoph F. Dietrich, Dirk-André Clevert, Yasunori Minami, Nathalie Lassau, Fuminori Moriyasu, Xiaoyan Xie, Andrej Lyshchik, Andre Ignee, Paul S. Sidhu, Adrian Saftoiu, Mirko D'Onofrio, Maria Cristina Chammas, Yuko Kono, Jean Michel Correas, Jae Young Lee, Guido Torzilli, Carlos Nicolau, Pintong Huang, Ping Liang, Won Jae Lee, Adrian Lim, Yi Dong, J. Brian Fowlkes, Richard G. Barr, Rongqin Zheng, Odd Helge Gilja, Fabio Piscaglia, Christian Pállson Nolsøe, Annalisa Berzigotti, Byung Ihn Choi, Christian Jenssen, Vito Cantisani, Dietrich C.F., Nolsoe C.P., Barr R.G., Berzigotti A., Burns P.N., Cantisani V., Chammas M.C., Chaubal N., Choi B.I., Clevert D.-A., Cui X., Dong Y., D'Onofrio M., Fowlkes J.B., Gilja O.H., Huang P., Ignee A., Jenssen C., Kono Y., Kudo M., Lassau N., Lee W.J., Lee J.Y., Liang P., Lim A., Lyshchik A., Meloni M.F., Correas J.M., Minami Y., Moriyasu F., Nicolau C., Piscaglia F., Saftoiu A., Sidhu P.S., Sporea I., Torzilli G., Xie X., and Zheng R.

Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty, 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak, Acoustics and Ultrasonics, Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), Biophysics, Contrast Media, Guideline, 030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging, Food and drug administration, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, medicine, Humans, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging, Medical physics, 610 Medicine & health, Ultrasonography, Interventional, Ultrasonography, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Liver Diseases, Liver Neoplasms, Liver, Good clinical practice, Contrast-enhanced ultrasound, World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, 030211 gastroenterology & hepatology
Abstract

The present, updated document describes the fourth iteration of recommendations for the hepatic use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound, first initiated in 2004 by the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. The previous updated editions of the guidelines reflected changes in the available contrast agents and updated the guidelines not only for hepatic but also for non-hepatic applications. The 2012 guideline requires updating as, previously, the differences in the contrast agents were not precisely described and the differences in contrast phases as well as handling were not clearly indicated. In addition, more evidence has been published for all contrast agents. The update also reflects the most recent developments in contrast agents, including U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval and the extensive Asian experience, to produce a truly international perspective. These guidelines and recommendations provide general advice on the use of ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) and are intended to create standard protocols for the use and administration of UCAs in liver applications on an international basis to improve the management of patients.

Published
2019

10. EFSUMB Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound (INVUS), Part I. General Aspects (Short Version)

Author

Lorentzen, T, Nolsoe, C. P., Ewertsen, C., Nielsen, M. B., Leen, E., Havre, R. F., Gritzmann, N., Brkljacic, B., Nürnberg, D., Kabaalioglu, A., Strobel, D., Jenssen, C., Gilja, O. H., Sidhu, P. S., Dietrich, C. F., PISCAGLIA, FABIO, Lorentzen, T, Nolsoe, C.P., Ewertsen, C., Nielsen, M.B., Leen, E., Havre, R.F., Gritzmann, N., Brkljacic, B., Nürnberg, D., Kabaalioglu, A., Strobel, D., Jenssen, C., Piscaglia, F., Gilja, O.H., Sidhu, P.S., and Dietrich, C.F.

Subjects
safety, Image-Guided Biopsy, hygiene, ultrasound guidance, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Germany, microbiology, Biopsy, Needle, Contrast Media, Humans, Ultrasonography, Doppler, guideline, Ultrasonography, Interventional
Abstract

This is the first part of the Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound of the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB) and covers all general aspects of ultrasound-guided procedures (short version; the long version is published online).

Published
2015

11. EFSUMB Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound (INVUS), Part I: General aspects (long Version)

Author

T, Lorentzen, C P, Nolsøe, C, Ewertsen, M B, Nielsen, E, Leen, R F, Havre, N, Gritzmann, B, Brkljacic, D, Nürnberg, A, Kabaalioglu, D, Strobel, C, Jenssen, F, Piscaglia, O H, Gilja, P S, Sidhu, C F, Dietrich, Lorentzen, T, Nolsoe, C.P., Ewertsen, C., Nielsen, M.B., Leen, E., Havre, R.F., Gritzmann, N., Brkljacic, B., Nürnberg, D., Kabaalioglu, A., Strobel, D., Jenssen, C., Piscaglia, F., Gilja, O.H., Sidhu, P.S., and Dietrich, C.F.

Subjects
safety, hygiene, ultrasound guidance, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Quality Assurance, Health Care, Germany, microbiology, Humans, guideline, Societies, Medical, Ultrasonography, Interventional
Abstract

This is the first part of the Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound of the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB) and covers all general aspects of ultrasound-guided procedures (long version).

Published
2015

12. EFSUMB Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound (INVUS), Part V

Author

Fabio Piscaglia, Paul S. Sidhu, A. Ignee, Eike Burmester, Roald Flesland Havre, Christian Pállson Nolsøe, Adrian Saftoiu, Mirko D'Onofrio, T. Lorentzen, Elisabetta Buscarini, Dieter Nürnberg, Martine Hocke, Pietro Fusaroli, Odd Helge Gilja, Peter Vilmann, Christoph F. Dietrich, Christian Jenssen, Fusaroli, P., Jenssen, C., Hocke, M., Burmester, E., Buscarini, E., Havre, R.F., Ignee, A., Saftoiu, A., Vilmann, P., Nolsoe, C.P., Nürnberg, D., D'Onofrio, M., Gilja, O.H., Lorentzen, T., Piscaglia, F., Sidhu, P.S., and Dietrich, C.F.

Subjects
Endoscopic ultrasound, medicine.medical_specialty, cholangiodrainage, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Celiac Plexus Neurolysis, guidelines - endoscopic ultrasound - EUS guidance - pseudocyst drainage - cholangiodrainage - pancreatic duct drainage - celiac plexus neurolysis, MEDLINE, Tumor ablation, Endosonography, EUS guidance, medicine, Animals, Humans, pancreatic duct drainage, Societies, Medical, Ultrasonography, Interventional, Interventional Ultrasound, medicine.diagnostic_test, business.industry, Ultrasound, Guideline, celiac plexus neurolysi, Europe, Clinical Practice, endoscopic ultrasound, Radiology, pseudocyst drainage, business, guideline
Abstract

The fifth section of the Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound (INVUS) of the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB) assesses the evidence for all the categories of endoscopic ultrasound-guided treatment reported to date. Celiac plexus neurolysis and block, vascular intervention, drainage of fluid collections, drainage of biliary and pancreatic ducts, and experimental tumor ablation techniques are discussed. For each topic, all current evidence has been extensively analyzed and summarized into major recommendations for reader consultation in clinical practice (long version).

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results