Search

Introduction: Half of all patients with testicular germ cell tumors (GCTs) present with metastases to retroperitoneal lymph nodes or visceral organs. Inguinal metastases (I/Ms) are very rare. We aimed to evaluate the relative frequency and clinical features of I/Ms and look for predisposing factors. Methods: A cohort of 740 GCT patients treated between 2010 and 2022 was analyzed. The frequency of I/M and their clinical features were statistically compared among the subgroups. Results: Eight patients had I/M, with a median age of 55 years, all of whom had primary seminoma and six had previous groin surgery. The relative frequency of I/M is 1.1% and 8.3% in the GCT patient cohort and the metastasized seminoma subgroup, respectively. All patients were cured, six underwent surgery and additional chemotherapy, and two received cisplatin-based chemotherapy alone. Discussion: I/Ms occur in approximately 1% of GCT patients. Prior groin surgery, bulky retroperitoneal metastases, and possibly histology of seminoma represent risk factors for I/M. The presence of I/M does not adversely affect prognosis, and all cases can be cured with standard therapeutic measures. Lymph node excision may be required to establish the diagnosis. In patients with risk factors, follow-up examinations should include the groins. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Paraneoplastic hyperthyroidism (PH) has been reported in patients with testicular germ cell tumors (GCTs), sporadically. This disorder is caused by extremely elevated serum levels of beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (bHCG). To date, little is known about the prevalence of PH, and its clinical features are poorly understood. The aim of the present study was to analyze the relative frequency and clinical features of PH in GCTs and evaluate their effects on therapeutic outcomes. Methods: A cohort of 438 patients treated for testicular GCT from 2017 to 2023 was retrospectively analyzed for histology, age, clinical stage, and presence of PH. The clinical features of the patients with PH were evaluated descriptively. The relative frequency of PH was compared among the subgroups using descriptive statistical methods. Results: Three patients with PH were identified; all had clinical symptoms of hyperthyroidism, suppressed serum levels of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), and increased levels of tri-iodothyronin (fT3). All the patients had advanced, metastasized, and non-seminomatous GCTs. Serum bHCG levels ranged from 225,00 U/L to 1,520,000 U/L. The prevalence of PH was 0.7% in the entire GCT population and 60% in those with very high bHCG serum levels. All the patients received standard cisplatin-based chemotherapy along with thyrostatic treatment. The clinical symptoms of the hyperthyroidism rapidly disappeared. TSH levels normalized with decreasing bHCG levels. The PH treatment did not affect the therapeutic outcomes of the patients. Conclusion: PH may occur in 0.7% of all patients with GCT but may be present in up to 60% of patients with very high levels of bHCG. Measuring serum levels of TSH and fT3 should be performed in addition to routine diagnostic measures in all patients with poor prognosis GCTs. Thyrostatic medication is recommended for patients with the clinical symptoms of hyperthyroidism. Early recognition of hyperthyroidism and prompt intervention will reduce comorbidity and help optimize therapeutic outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Mediastinal germ cell tumors are rare and few large-scale studies on mediastinal germ cell tumors are reported. We aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics and survival outcomes of patients with mediastinum germ cell tumors in Japan. Methods: A hospital-based cancer registry data in Japan was used to identify and enroll patients diagnosed with mediastinal germ cell tumors in 2012–2013. The datasets were registered from 80 institutions. Results: The selection criteria were met by 123 patients, the majority of whom were male. The median age at diagnosis was 39 years (range 25–89 years) and the most common age groups at diagnosis was 30–39 years, followed by 40–49 years and ≥ 50 years. The histology of non-seminoma (55.3%) was slightly more frequent than that of seminoma (44.7%). The most common histological subtype in non-seminoma was yolk sac tumor, followed by mixed germ cell tumor. The 5-year survival of seminoma and non-seminoma were 96.4% and 57.3%, respectively (p < 0.001). Non-seminomatous mediastinal germ cell tumors, malignant teratomas, mixed germ cell tumors, and yolk sac tumors had comparable survival rates, while those with choriocarcinoma showed the worst prognosis. Conclusions: This is the first report showing the clinical characteristics and survival outcomes of mediastinal germ cell tumors in Japan using a real-world large cohort database. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To compare the outcomes and treatment burden of primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (pRPLND) alone versus pRPLND + adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in patients with pathological stage II (PSII) non‐seminomatous germ cell tumours (NSGCT). Patients and Methods: Retrospective review of the Princess Margaret Cancer Center eTestes cancer database identified patients with PSII NSGCT after pRPLND between 1995 and 2020. The primary outcome was relapse‐free survival (RFS). Secondary outcomes included disease‐specific survival (DSS), burden of relapse treatment, and factors associated with relapse. Results: A total of 109 PSII patients were included in the study. There were 96 patients treated with pRPLND alone and 13 treated with pRPLND + AC. The median follow‐up was 61 months. The 5‐year RFS was 72% for the pRPLND‐only group vs 92% for the pRPLND + AC group (hazard ratio [HR] 4.372, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59–32.36; P = 0.11). Within the pRPLND‐only group the 5‐year RFS differed by pN stage (pN1 = 94% vs pN2/N3 = 67%, P = 0.03). Despite a higher relapse rate within the pRPLND‐only group, the DSS was similar at 5 years (98% pRPLND only vs 100% pRPLND + AC, P = 0.48). Only 24 (25%) of the patients in the pRPLND‐only group required any subsequent chemotherapy. Despite achieving similar survival, the cumulative post‐RPLND treatment burden was less for the pRPLND‐only group than the pRPLND+AC group overall (average 1.23 vs 2.46 cycles of chemotherapy per patient in group). Conclusion: The majority of patients with PSII NSGCT treated with pRPLND alone do not experience a recurrence or require chemotherapy. Despite a lower relapse risk when AC is given, no difference in survival was seen but higher chemotherapy burden was entertained. AC may constitute overtreatment for most patients with PSII NSGCT treated with pRPLND. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (PC-RPLND) is an integral component of testicular cancer treatment, as approximately one-third of patients will have a residual mass after undergoing chemotherapy. This study aimed to assess sexual and reproductive outcomes in patients undergoing post-chemotherapy robot-assisted retroperitoneal unilateral lymph node dissection (PC-rRPLND) for non-seminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCTs) at a high-volume cancer center. Preoperative and postoperative (at 12 months) ejaculatory function as well as erectile function, based on the International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5) and Erection Hardness Score (EHS), were assessed. Overall, 22 patients were included. This study highlights retrograde ejaculation as a significant complication of PC-rRPLND, along with a non-negligible occurrence of erectile dysfunction among patients. We aimed to report sexual and reproductive outcomes following post-chemotherapy robot-assisted retroperitoneal unilateral lymph node dissection (PC-rRPLND) for non-seminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCTs) at a high-volume cancer center. We collected records regarding sexual and reproductive outcomes of patients undergoing unilateral PC-rRPLND for stage II NSGCTs from January 2018 to November 2021. Preoperative and postoperative (at 12 months) ejaculatory function as well as erectile function, based on the International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5) and Erection Hardness Score (EHS), were assessed. Only patients with a pre-operative IIEF-5 of ≥22 and EHS of ≥3 were included in this analysis. Overall, 22 patients undergoing unilateral PC-rRPLND met the inclusion criteria. Of these, seven (31.8%) patients presented an andrological disorder of any type after PC-rRPLND. Specifically, retrograde ejaculation was present in three (13.6%) patients and hypospermia was present in one (4.5%) patient. Moreover, three (13.6%) patients yielded erectile dysfunction (IIEF-5 < 22 and/or EHS < 3). Lastly, two (9.1%) succeeded in naturally conceiving a child after PC-rRPLND. Retrograde ejaculation is confirmed to be one of the most common complications of PC-rRPLND. Moreover, a non-negligible number of patients experience erectile dysfunction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To assess whether extended surveillance with repeated computed tomography (CT) scans for patients with clinical stage IIA (CS IIA; <2 cm abdominal node involvement) and negative markers (Mk−) non‐seminomatous germ cell tumours (NSGCTs) can identify those with true CS I. To assess the rate of benign lymph nodes, teratoma, and viable cancer in retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) histopathology for patients with CS IIA Mk− NSGCT. Patients and methods: Observational prospective population‐based study of patients diagnosed 2008–2019 with CS IIA Mk− NSGCT in the Swedish and Norwegian Testicular Cancer Group (SWENOTECA) registry. Patients were managed with surveillance, with CT scans, and tumour markers every sixth week for a maximum of 18 weeks. Patients with radiological regression were treated as CS I, if progression with chemotherapy, and remaining CS IIA Mk− disease with RPLND. The end‐point was the number and percentage of patients down‐staged to CS I on surveillance and rate of RPLND histopathology presented as benign, teratoma, or viable cancer. Results: Overall, 126 patients with CS IIA Mk− NSGCT were included but 41 received therapy upfront. After surveillance for a median (range) of 6 (6–18) weeks, 23/85 (27%) patients were in true CS I and four (5%) progressed. Of the remaining 58 patients with lasting CS IIA Mk− NSGCT, 16 received chemotherapy and 42 underwent RPLND. The RPLND histopathology revealed benign lymph nodes in 11 (26%), teratoma in two (6%), and viable cancer in 29 (70%) patients. Conclusions: Surveillance with repeated CT scans can identify patients in true CS I, thus avoiding overtreatment. The RPLND histopathology in patients with CS IIA Mk− NSGCT had a high rate of cancer and a low rate of teratoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Both ovarian and testicular germ cell tumors (GCTs) arise from the primordial germ cell and share many similarities. Both malignancies affect mainly young patients, show remarkable responsiveness to cisplatin‐based therapy, and have an excellent prognosis, which also highlights the importance of minimizing long‐term side effects. However, certain differences can be noted: The spreading of the disease differs, and the staging system and treatment recommendations are dissimilar. Moreover, the prognosis for ovarian GCTs is significantly inferior to that for testicular cancer, as exemplified in this review comparing the survival in Swedish patients diagnosed with testicular (1995–2022) and ovarian (1990–2018) GCTs. The 5‐year overall survival in ovarian GCTs was 85.2%, versus 98.2% for testicular GCTs. How can this be explained? One reason may be the difference in knowledge, experience, and evidence because the incidence rate of testicular cancer is more than 15 times that of ovarian GCTs. Given the rarity of the disease in women and the lack of established guidelines, a comprehensive understanding of the disease and treatment decisions is challenging. The main objective of this review is to derive insights from testicular GCTs (seminoma and non‐seminoma) by reviewing etiological, tumor biological, and clinical knowledge, and to thereafter suggest actions for ovarian GCTs based on this. We hypothesize that by adopting specific treatment strategies from testicular GCTs—including de‐escalating adjuvant chemotherapy for low‐risk patients and implementing more standardized and intensive treatment protocols in cases of relapse—we can improve the prognosis and minimize long‐term side effects in ovarian GCT patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The incidence of testicular cancer (TC) has been rapidly increasing over the past years. Diagnosis and early treatment have shown good oncological control, guaranteeing the patient different treatment approaches according to histology and tumor stage. Currently, physicians usually prioritize oncological outcomes over sexual outcomes and quality of life, considering as a first aim the overall survival of the patients; however, differently from other neoplasms, quality of life is still strongly affected among TC patients, and sexual outcomes are frequently compromised after each TC treatment. Several studies have suggested that each treatment approach may be associated with sexual dysfunctions, including erectile dysfunction, ejaculatory disorders, fertility issues, and hormonal changes. Since testicular cancer patients are more frequently young men, the subject of this work is substantial and should be analyzed in detail to help specialists in the management of this disease. The aim of the current narrative review is to generally describe every treatment for TC, including surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection, and to establish which sexual dysfunction may be specifically associated with each therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Testicular Germ Cell Tumor (GCT) is a disease of young adults and is also highly curable. But in India, most of the patients present in an advanced stage and succumb to the disease as compared to the Western nations where patients present at an earlier stage and are mostly cured. Also, there is a scarcity of literature on testicular GCT from the Indian subcontinent. We present our experience from the Tata Memorial Centre of North-east India. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at Tata Memorial Centre - BBCI, Guwahati for the period of 5 years from January 2018 to December 2022. The study focused on epidemiology, clinical presentation, and treatment outcomes. Results: Seventy-two cases of testicular GCTs were studied (28 cases were seminoma, and 44 were non-seminoma). Most common presenting stage was stage I in seminoma (53.6%), and stage III (77.2%) in non-seminoma. As per the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) classification, 25%, 35%, and 40% of patients were good-risk, intermediate-risk, and poor-risk in non-seminoma. In patients with seminoma, 54% and 46% were in good and intermediate-risk, respectively. Seventy-two percent and 21% had achieved a radiologic complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) with conventional chemotherapy in patients with seminoma. Radiologic CR and PR rates were 20% and 61% among non-seminoma patients. The median recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 43 months. RFS was better in seminoma versus non-seminoma, stage I versus stage III, and good-risk versus high-risk group. Conclusion: Most of our patients presented with an advanced stage of the disease and a high nodal burden. In patients with non-seminoma GCT, the best response to conventional chemotherapy was a partial response. The use of an alternative chemotherapy regimen to improve outcomes for such patients can be further explored.

A 35-year-old man was diagnosed with stage IIIC non-seminoma with paralysis of the lower half of his body due to 8th thoracic spine metastasis. The patient received bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP) therapy. On day 4 of the second course of BEP, the patient developed a fever and was diagnosed with coronavirus disease (COVID-19). COVID-19 was suspected to worsen because of cancer and chemotherapy-induced immunosuppression. However, the benefits of continuing BEP therapy outweighed these risks. After obtaining fully informed consent, BEP therapy was continued from day 5, while sotrovimab (anti-COVID-19 drug) was administered. The second course of BEP was completed without worsening severe COVID-19 or bleomycin-induced lung injury. The patient completed four courses of BEP, with normalization of tumor markers, partial response on imaging, and improvement in lower body paralysis. In this case, we successfully treated a patient with testicular germ cell tumor with chemotherapy while having COVID-19 without treatment delay. During the COVID-19 pandemic, concomitant chemotherapy and COVID-19 treatment are warranted because delaying treatment will decrease the efficacy of highly curative diseases such as germ cell tumors.

Introduction: Testicular Germ Cell Tumor (GCT) is a disease of young adults and is also highly curable. But in India, most of the patients present in an advanced stage and succumb to the disease as compared to the Western nations where patients present at an earlier stage and are mostly cured. Also, there is a scarcity of literature on testicular GCT from the Indian subcontinent. We present our experience from the Tata Memorial Centre of North-east India. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at Tata Memorial Centre - BBCI, Guwahati for the period of 5 years from January 2018 to December 2022. The study focused on epidemiology, clinical presentation, and treatment outcomes. Results: Seventy-two cases of testicular GCTs were studied (28 cases were seminoma, and 44 were non-seminoma). Most common presenting stage was stage I in seminoma (53.6%), and stage III (77.2%) in non-seminoma. As per the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) classification, 25%, 35%, and 40% of patients were good-risk, intermediate-risk, and poor-risk in non-seminoma. In patients with seminoma, 54% and 46% were in good and intermediate-risk, respectively. Seventy-two percent and 21% had achieved a radiologic complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) with conventional chemotherapy in patients with seminoma. Radiologic CR and PR rates were 20% and 61% among non-seminoma patients. The median recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 43 months. RFS was better in seminoma versus non-seminoma, stage I versus stage III, and good-risk versus high-risk group. Conclusion: Most of our patients presented with an advanced stage of the disease and a high nodal burden. In patients with non-seminoma GCT, the best response to conventional chemotherapy was a partial response. The use of an alternative chemotherapy regimen to improve outcomes for such patients can be further explored. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Testicular cancer (TC) is the most common cancer in young males, representing about ~1% of new cases of cancer in male patients around the world. Objective: The study aims to assess prognostic factors of testicular cancer, overall survival and progression free survival. Patients and Methods: Sixty patients with testicular cancer who had been attended to the Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Department at Mansoura University Hospitals between January 2006 and Desember2020 were included in this retrospective analysis. Results: The median age of the patients was 43 years. The most common presentation was testicular mass (71.7%). Cryptorchidism was presented in 7 cases (11.7%). Most of our patients were germ cell tumors 51cases (85%) divided into seminoma 34 patients (56.7%), nonseminoma17 patients (28.3%), 7 patient (11.7 %) were nongerm cell tumors and 2 patients (3.3%) were miscellaneous tumors. Regarding tumor, node and metastasis (TNM) staging, 43 patients (71.7%) were stage I, and 14 patients (23.3%) were stage III. Regarding lymph node metastasis, 57 patients (95%) were N0. All patients underwent high inguinal orchiectomy, (80%) of patients received chemotherapy, and 7 patients (11.7%) received radiotherapy. The 5 years overall survival was (91.7%) while 5 years progression free survival was (88.3%). Conclusion: Absence of cryptorchidism, germ cell tumors, node negative and stage I all are good prognostic factors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ABSTRACT Objective: This study was conducted to provide data about the survival rate of testicular cancer patients with different histology in the year 2013 – 2017 in Adam Malik General Hospital and to compare these estimates with other studies conducted in another center. Material & Methods: Medical records of testicular cancer patients from 2013 to 2017 in Adam Malik General Hospital were collected. We measured 5-year relative survival between the histology group of seminoma and non-seminoma estimated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Also, using Kaplan-Meier for survival analysis estimated, 5-year relative survival between metastatic and non-metastatic was estimated. Results: 63 male patients (mean age 27.5 ± 17.6 years old) were included in this study. The distribution of histology were non-seminoma (53.9%), seminoma (39.9%), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (4.7%), and gonadoblastoma (1.5%). The 5-year relative survival rate was 82.5% for the seminoma group and 80.9 % for the non-seminoma group. The 5-year survival rate in the seminoma group with metastatic was 77.8% and in the non-metastatic group was 87.3 %. The 5-year survival rate in the non-seminoma group with metastatic was 74.6 % and in the non-metastatic group was 88.9 %. Conclusion: 5-year relative survival was better for the seminoma group than the non-seminoma group. Moreover, non-metastasis seminoma was found to have a better outcome than the metastatic group. Despite that, in the non-metastatic group, it is found that non-seminoma testicular cancer has a better survival rate than seminoma testicular cancer. Keywords: 5-year relative survival rate, seminoma, non-seminoma, testicular cancer.

Cancer impairs spermatogenesis, whereas results on sperm DNA integrity are controversial and no data are available about sperm oxidative stress. In cancer patients, we detected sperm DNA fragmentation (sDF) and both viable (ROS production in viable sperm fraction/viable spermatozoa) and total (ROS production in viable sperm fraction/total spermatozoa) oxidative stress. We found that cancer (22.50 (17.00–26.75)%, n = 85) increased sDF with respect to the control groups in both normozoospermic subfertile patients (NSP) (12.75 (8.63–14.88)%, n = 52, p < 0.001) and in healthy donors (HD) (8.50 (7.00–14.00)%, n = 19, p < 0.001). The induction of viable oxidative stress (n = 96) with cancer was even higher: 36.60 (24.05–58.65)% versus 11.10 (8.63–14.90)% in NSP (p < 0.001) and 9.60 (8.00–14.03)% in HD (p < 0.001). Similar, albeit lower, differences were found for total oxidative stress. SDF sharply correlated to viable oxidative stress when we considered all subjects (cancer patients and controls) (r = 0.591, p < 0.001, n = 134), but no correlation was found when only cancer patients were studied (r = 0.200; p > 0.05, n = 63). In conclusion, cancer significantly increases sDF and sperm oxidative stress levels. Additional mechanisms to oxidative attack might be responsible for increased sDF in cancer patients. Because sperm oxidative stress might affect the outcomes of sperm cryopreservation, of cancer treatments and of sperm epigenoma, the detection of oxidative stress could be of help in managing the reproductive issues of cancer patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Testicular germ cell cancer (TGCC) is characterized by an extensive immune cell infiltration, which generates a pro-inflammatory tumor microenvironment (TME). The aim of this study is to compare the interaction of tumor cells representative of two major TGCC subtypes with the immune system in an in vitro coculture model. We found that the non-seminomatous cell line NTERA-2 lacks immunostimulatory capacity and even inhibits T cell and monocyte activity, thus sharply contrasting the opposing properties of the seminomatous cell line TCam-2. We hypothesize that different immunological characteristics of tumor cell subtypes may explain some of the clinical characteristics of TGCC. Testicular germ cell cancer (TGCC) is subdivided into several subtypes. While seminomatous germ cell tumors (SGCT) are characterized by an intensive infiltration of immune cells which constitute a pro-inflammatory tumor micromilieu (TME), immune cells in non-seminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT) are differently composed and less abundant. Previously, we have shown that the seminomatous cell line TCam-2 promotes T cell and monocyte activation in a coculture model, resulting in mutual interactions between both cell types. Here we set out to compare this feature of TCam-2 cells with the non-seminomatous cell line NTERA-2. Peripheral blood T cells or monocytes cocultured with NTERA-2 cells failed to secrete relevant amounts of pro-inflammatory cytokines, and significantly downregulated the expression of genes encoding activation markers and effector molecules. In contrast, immune cells cocultured with TCam-2 cells produced IL-2, IL-6 and TNFα, and strongly upregulated the expression of multiple pro-inflammatory genes. Furthermore, the expression of genes involved in proliferation, stemness and subtype specification remained unaltered in NTERA-2 cells during coculture with T cells or monocytes, indicating the absence of mutual interactions. Collectively, our findings uncover fundamental differences between SGCT and NSGCT in their capability to generate a pro-inflammatory TME, which possibly impacts the clinical features and prognosis of both TGCC subtypes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Testicular germ cell tumours (TGCTs) are the most common malignancy in young men. Originating from foetal testicular germ cells that fail to differentiate correctly, TGCTs appear after puberty as germ cell neoplasia in situ cells that transform through unknown mechanisms into distinct seminoma and non-seminoma tumour types. A balance between activin and BMP signalling may influence TGCT emergence and progression, and we investigated this using human cell line models of seminoma (TCam-2) and non-seminoma (NT2/D1). Activin A- and BMP4-regulated transcripts measured at 6 h post-treatment by RNA-sequencing revealed fewer altered transcripts in TCam-2 cells but a greater responsiveness to activin A, while BMP4 altered more transcripts in NT2/D1 cells. Activin significantly elevated transcripts linked to pluripotency, cancer, TGF-β, Notch, p53, and Hippo signalling in both lines, whereas BMP4 altered TGF-β, pluripotency, Hippo and Wnt signalling components. Dose-dependent antagonism of BMP4 signalling by activin A in TCam-2 cells demonstrated signalling crosstalk between these two TGF-β superfamily arms. Levels of the nuclear transport protein, IPO5, implicated in BMP4 and WNT signalling, are highly regulated in the foetal mouse germline. IPO5 knockdown in TCam-2 cells using siRNA blunted BMP4-induced transcript changes, indicating that IPO5 levels could determine TGF-β signalling pathway outcomes in TGCTs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The incidence of testicular cancer (TC) has been rapidly increasing over the past years. Diagnosis and early treatment have shown good oncological control, guaranteeing the patient different treatment approaches according to histology and tumor stage. Currently, physicians usually prioritize oncological outcomes over sexual outcomes and quality of life, considering as a first aim the overall survival of the patients; however, differently from other neoplasms, quality of life is still strongly affected among TC patients, and sexual outcomes are frequently compromised after each TC treatment. Several studies have suggested that each treatment approach may be associated with sexual dysfunctions, including erectile dysfunction, ejaculatory disorders, fertility issues, and hormonal changes. Since testicular cancer patients are more frequently young men, the subject of this work is substantial and should be analyzed in detail to help specialists in the management of this disease. The aim of the current narrative review is to generally describe every treatment for TC, including surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection, and to establish which sexual dysfunction may be specifically associated with each therapy.

To explore clinical and pathological characteristics of testicular cancer and also identify factors associated with its oncological outcomes. Testicular cancer has a very good prognosis. Actually, we aim to report on 10 years of experience in the real-world practice of treating testicular cancer in a university-based hospital.

Background and Objectives: The impact of pure histological subtypes in testicular non-seminoma germ cell tumors on survival, specifically regarding pure embryonal carcinoma, is not well established. Therefore, this study aimed to test for differences between pure embryonal carcinoma and mixed germ cell tumor patients within stages I, II and III in a large population-based database. Materials and Methods: We relied on the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database (2004–2019) to identify testicular pure embryonal carcinoma vs. mixed germ cell tumor patients. Cumulative incidence plots depicted cancer-specific mortality that represented the main endpoint of interest. Multivariable competing risks regression models tested for differences between pure embryonal carcinoma and mixed germ cell tumor patients in analyses addressing cancer-specific mortality and adjusted for other-cause mortality. Results: Of 11,223 patients, 2473 (22%) had pure embryonal carcinoma. Pure embryonal carcinoma patients exhibited lower cancer-specific mortality relative to their mixed germ cell tumor counterparts for both stage III (13.9 vs. 19.4%; p < 0.01) and stage II (0.5 vs. 3.4%, p < 0.01), but not in stage I (0.9 vs. 1.6%, p = 0.1). In multivariable competing risks regression models, pure embryonal carcinoma exhibited more favorable cancer-specific mortality than mixed germ cell tumor in stage III (hazard ratio 0.71, p = 0.01) and stage II (hazard ratio 0.11, p < 0.01). Conclusions: Pure embryonal carcinoma exhibits a more favorable cancer-specific mortality profile relative to mixed germ cell tumor in stage II and III testicular cancers. Consequently, the presence of mixed germ cell tumor elements may be interpreted as a risk factor for cancer-specific survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Previous analyses from referral centers of testicular cancer investigated the prognostic impact of presence of teratoma components in advanced testicular primary tumor specimens and observed conflicting results. However, data investigating pure teratoma in primary tumor specimens is limited and the prognostic impact is uncertain. To address this void, we tested for overall survival differences and subsequently, differences in cancer-specific and other-cause mortality in pure teratoma vs. mixed germ cell tumor patients. We aimed to test for survival differences between testicular pure teratoma vs. mixed germ cell tumor (GCT) patients in a stage-specific fashion. Pure teratoma and mixed GCT in primary tumor specimens were identified within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004–2019). Kaplan–Meier curves depicted five-year overall survival (OS) and subsequently, cumulative incidence plots depicted cancer-specific mortality (CSM) and other-cause mortality (OCM) in a stage-specific fashion. Multivariable competing risks regression (CRR) models were used. Of 9049 patients, 299 (3%) had pure teratoma. In stage I, II and III, five-year OS rates differed between pure teratoma and mixed GCT (stage I: 91.6 vs. 97.2%, p < 0.001; stage II: 100 vs. 95.9%, p < 0.001; stage III: 66.8 vs. 77.8%, p = 0.021). In stage I, survival differences originated from higher OCM (6.4 vs. 1.2%; p < 0.001). Conversely in stage III, survival differences originated from higher CSM (29.4 vs. 19.0%; p = 0.03). In multivariable CRR models, pure teratoma was associated with higher OCM in stage I (Hazard Ratio (HR): 4.83; p < 0.01). Conversely, in stage III, in multivariable CRR models, pure teratoma was associated with higher CSM (HR: 1.92; p = 0.04). In pure teratoma, survival disadvantage in stage I patients relates to OCM. Survival disadvantage in stage III pure teratoma originates from higher CSM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A 35-year-old man was diagnosed with stage IIIC non-seminoma with paralysis of the lower half of his body due to 8th thoracic spine metastasis. The patient received bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP) therapy. On day 4 of the second course of BEP, the patient developed a fever and was diagnosed with coronavirus disease (COVID-19). COVID-19 was suspected to worsen because of cancer and chemotherapy-induced immunosuppression. However, the benefits of continuing BEP therapy outweighed these risks. After obtaining fully informed consent, BEP therapy was continued from day 5, while sotrovimab (anti-COVID-19 drug) was administered. The second course of BEP was completed without worsening severe COVID-19 or bleomycin-induced lung injury. The patient completed four courses of BEP, with normalization of tumor markers, partial response on imaging, and improvement in lower body paralysis. In this case, we successfully treated a patient with testicular germ cell tumor with chemotherapy while having COVID-19 without treatment delay. During the COVID-19 pandemic, concomitant chemotherapy and COVID-19 treatment are warranted because delaying treatment will decrease the efficacy of highly curative diseases such as germ cell tumors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To present the current evidence and the development of studies in recent years on the management of extragonadal germ cell tumors (EGCT). Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in Medline and the Cochrane Library. Studies within the search period (January 2010 to February 2021) that addressed the classification, diagnosis, prognosis, treatment, and follow-up of extragonadal tumors were included. Risk of bias was assessed and relevant data were extracted in evidence tables. Results: The systematic search identified nine studies. Germ cell tumors (GCT) arise predominantly from within the testis, but about 5% of the tumors are primarily located extragonadal. EGCT are localized primarily mediastinal or retroperitoneal in the midline of the body. EGCT patients are classified according to the IGCCCG classification. Consecutively, all mediastinal non-seminomatous EGCT patients belong to the "poor prognosis" group. In contrast mediastinal seminoma and both retroperitoneal seminoma and non-seminoma patients seem to have a similar prognosis as patients with gonadal GCTs and metastasis at theses respective sites. The standard chemotherapy regimen for patients with a EGCT consists of 3–4 cycles (good vs intermediate prognosis) of bleomycin, etoposid, cisplatin (BEP); however, due to their very poor prognosis patients with non-seminomatous mediastinal GCT should receive a dose-intensified or high-dose chemotherapy approach upfront on an individual basis and should thus be referred to expert centers Ifosfamide may be exchanged for bleomycin in cases of additional pulmonary metastasis due to subsequently planned resections. In general patients with non-seminomatous EGCT, residual tumor resection (RTR) should be performed after chemotherapy. Conclusion: In general, non-seminomatous EGCT have a poorer prognosis compared to testicular GCT, while seminomatous EGGCT seem to have a similar prognosis to patients with metastatic testicular seminoma. The current insights on EGCT are limited, since all data are mainly based on case series and studies with small patient numbers and non-comparative studies. In general, systemic treatment should be performed like in testicular metastatic GCTs but upfront dose intensification of chemotherapy should be considered for mediastinal non-seminoma patients. Thus, EGCT should be referred to interdisciplinary centers with utmost experience in the treatment of germ cell tumors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Germ cell tumors arise in childhood but peak at around 30 years of age. They are the most common cancers in males under the age of 35. Over 95% arise in the testes while a minority originate in extragonadal sites such as the anterior mediastinum, or mainly in childhood the pineal gland or the sacrococcygeal area. These tumors show an extraordinary sensitivity to chemotherapy (and for seminoma, also to radiation) and cure rates are relatively high even in second or subsequent relapses. Very few data are present in the literature regarding patients diagnosed after 50 years and no specific trials have been conducted in this setting. Nearly all patients reported in the literature had testicular cancers, with occasional reports of extragonadal tumors. Despite the fact that > 50 years may be considered an “elderly” population, these patients are treated with the same cisplatin containing combinations as their younger counterparts with consequent higher toxicity. In this review we will present epidemiological and clinical data from this rare population of patients with testicular cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Germ cell tumors arise in childhood but peak at around 30 years of age. They are the most common cancers in males under the age of 35. Over 95% arise in the testes while a minority originate in extragonadal sites such as the anterior mediastinum, or mainly in childhood the pineal gland or the sacrococcygeal area. These tumors show an extraordinary sensitivity to chemotherapy (and for seminoma, also to radiation) and cure rates are relatively high even in second or subsequent relapses. Very few data are present in the literature regarding patients diagnosed after 50 years and no specific trials have been conducted in this setting. Nearly all patients reported in the literature had testicular cancers, with occasional reports of extragonadal tumors. Despite the fact that > 50 years may be considered an “elderly” population, these patients are treated with the same cisplatin containing combinations as their younger counterparts with consequent higher toxicity. In this review we will present epidemiological and clinical data from this rare population of patients with testicular cancer.

We present the case of a 31-year-old male patient with non-seminoma (90% embryonal carcinoma, 10% teratoma) pT1b L1 V0 Pn0 R0 cN2 cM0, Clinical Stage IIb and "good prognosis group" according to IGCCCG of the left testis. According to EAU guidelines, he received three cycles of BEP. After the second cycle, he developed recurrent, clinically not significant rectal bleeding, which we associated with deep thrombocytopenia. Following chemotherapy, there was one lymph node in the CT scan left, with a diameter of 0.9 cm at the inferior mesenteric arteria and the rectal bleeding did not stop; so coloscopy and staging revealed rectal cancer (adenocarcinoma) with peritoneal carcinosis. The patient was scheduled for radio-chemotherapy. Next-generation sequencing of the adenocarcinoma showed two mutations in KRAS and TP53 genes. To our knowledge, this is the first case of non-seminoma and coincidental rectal cancer. Furthermore, this case underlines the significance of molecular biological studies for the development of individualized targeted therapies, especially in younger patients and in chemo- and/or platin-resistance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Testicular germ cell tumours (TGCTs) are the most common cancer in young male adults (aged 15 to 40). Unlike most other cancer types, identification of molecular signatures in TGCT has rarely reported. In this study, we developed a novel integrative analysis framework to identify co-methylated and co-expressed genes [mRNAs and microRNAs (miRNAs)] modules in two TGCT subtypes: non-seminoma (NSE) and seminoma (SE). We first integrated DNA methylation and mRNA/miRNA expression data and then used a statistical method, CoMEx (Combined score of DNA Methylation and Expression), to assess differentially expressed and methylated (DEM) genes/miRNAs. Next, we identified co-methylation and co-expression modules by applying WGCNA (Weighted Gene Correlation Network Analysis) tool to these DEM genes/miRNAs. The module with the highest average Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient (PCC) after considering all pair-wise molecules (genes/miRNAs) included 91 molecules. By integrating both transcription factor and miRNA regulations, we constructed subtype-specific regulatory networks for NSE and SE. We identified four hub miRNAs (miR-182-5p, miR-520b, miR-520c-3p, and miR-7-5p), two hub TFs (MYC and SP1), and two genes (RECK and TERT) in the NSE-specific regulatory network, and two hub miRNAs (miR-182-5p and miR-338-3p), five hub TFs (ETS1, HIF1A, HNF1A, MYC, and SP1), and three hub genes (CDH1, CXCR4, and SNAI1) in the SE-specific regulatory network. miRNA (miR-182-5p) and two TFs (MYC and SP1) were common hubs of NSE and SE. We further examined pathways enriched in these subtype-specific networks. Our study provides a comprehensive view of the molecular signatures and co-regulation in two TGCT subtypes.

Objective: To determine five-year survival and stratify risk factors for disease relapse in the clinical stage I germ cell tumour post orchiectomy. Study Design: Retrospective longitudinal study. Place and Duration of Study: Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre Lahore Pakistan, from 2008 to 2013. Methodology: We analyzed overall survival and disease-free survival in patients with stage 1 Germ cell tumours who either received chemotherapy or were kept on active surveillance after higher orchiectomy. In addition, risk factor stratification for recurrence was determined using the clinical, radiological and histopathological parameters. Results: Of 88 patients, 51 (58%) received chemotherapy, while 37 (42%) patients were kept on surveillance post orchiectomy for stage I germ cell tumours, including seminoma and non-seminoma histologies. Five-year overall survival and disease-free survivals were 99% and 92%, respectively, for all patients with stage 1 Germ cell tumours. Subgroup analysis showed that DFS was better in the adjuvant chemotherapy arm than the surveillance arm in both subtype histologies; however, five-year overall survival was comparable. Lymph vascular invasion and tumour size (T) was identified as risk factor for disease relapse. Conclusion: This institutional report suggests that while identifying risk factors, active surveillance post orchiectomy can be an effective treatment option for clinical stage I germ cell tumours and is comparable with adjuvant chemotherapy. Two important factors determining survival in our study were Lymph vascular invasion and T staging. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although patients with primary mediastinal germ cell tumor are often referred to the Department of Thoracic Surgery because of the location of the tumor, these patients should be treated with a multidisciplinary approach by multiple departments. We herein report the cases of two patients with this disease. Case 1. A 20-year-old man. The patient visited a local doctor for the compliant of thoracic pain and his chest radiograph was abnormal, leading to the suspicion of an anterior mediastinal tumor with invasion of the superior vena cava. He was referred to the Department of Thoracic Surgery in our institution. CT scan showed an 8 cm mediastinal tumor, invasion of the superior vena cava, right superior lobe, and right auricle, with the findings of AFP 4.1 ng/mL, hCG ＜ 0.5 mIU/mL and LDH 176 IU/L. CT-guided biopsy revealed the tumor to be a seminoma (good prognosis). We urologists began to treat him with 3 cycles of BEP chemotherapy and 1 cycle of EP chemotherapy, resulting in a partial response. The patient then underwent resection of the tumor together with the right lobe and superior vena cava. Case 2. A 19-year-old man. An anterior mediastinal tumor was found because of a cough and chest pain, and the patient then came to the Department of Respiratory Diseases in our institution. CT showed a 10 cm tumor, with the findings of AFP 26678 ng/mL, hCG 2.2 mIU/mL and LDH 223 IU/L. CT-guided biopsy revealed it to be a yolk sac tumor. Against this non-seminoma (poor prognosis), we urologists began 4 cycles of BEP chemotherapy. Because of a partial response and normalization of the AFP level, the patient then underwent resection of the tumor with the left upper lobe to result in complete remission. To date, both men have experienced no recurrence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• This ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline provides key recommendations on the management of testicular seminoma and non-seminoma. • Authorship includes a multidisciplinary group of experts from different institutions and countries in Europe. • Key treatment recommendations are provided. • Recommendations are based on available scientific data and the authors' collective expert opinion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

AustraliaPurpose: Patients with non-seminoma testicular cancer (NSTC) cancer can be subfertile or infertile, and present reduced sperm quality, but the underlying mechanisms are unknown. The aim of this study was to compare the sperm proteome of patients with NSTC, who cryopreserved their sperm before starting cancer treatment, with that from healthy fertile men.Materials and Methods: Semen volume, sperm motility and sperm concentration were evaluated before the cryopreservation of samples from patients with NSTC (n=15) and the control group (n=15). Sperm proteomic analysis was performed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and the differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) between the two groups were identified using bioinformatic tools.Results: A total of 189 DEPs was identified in the dataset, from which five DEPs related to sperm function and fertilization were selected for validation by Western blot. We were able to validate the underexpression of the mitochondrial complex subunits NADH:Ubiquinone Oxidoreductase Core Subunit S1 (NDUFS1) and ubiquinol-cytochrome C reductase core protein 2 (UQCRC2), as well as the underexpression of the testis-specific sodium/potassium-transporting ATPase subunit alpha-4 (ATP1A4) in the NSTC group. Conclusions: Our results indicate that sperm mitochondrial dysfunction may explain the observed decrease in sperm concentration, total sperm count and total motile count in NSTC patients. The identified DEPs may serve as potential biomarkers for the pathophysiology of subfertility/infertility in patients with NSTC. Our study also associates the reduced fertilizing ability of NSTC patients with the dysregulation of important sperm molecular mechanisms.

Cancer impairs spermatogenesis, whereas results on sperm DNA integrity are controversial and no data are available about sperm oxidative stress. In cancer patients, we detected sperm DNA fragmentation (sDF) and both viable (ROS production in viable sperm fraction/viable spermatozoa) and total (ROS production in viable sperm fraction/total spermatozoa) oxidative stress. We found that cancer (22.50 (17.00–26.75)%, n = 85) increased sDF with respect to the control groups in both normozoospermic subfertile patients (NSP) (12.75 (8.63–14.88)%, n = 52, p < 0.001) and in healthy donors (HD) (8.50 (7.00–14.00)%, n = 19, p < 0.001). The induction of viable oxidative stress (n = 96) with cancer was even higher: 36.60 (24.05–58.65)% versus 11.10 (8.63–14.90)% in NSP (p < 0.001) and 9.60 (8.00–14.03)% in HD (p < 0.001). Similar, albeit lower, differences were found for total oxidative stress. SDF sharply correlated to viable oxidative stress when we considered all subjects (cancer patients and controls) (r = 0.591, p < 0.001, n = 134), but no correlation was found when only cancer patients were studied (r = 0.200; p > 0.05, n = 63). In conclusion, cancer significantly increases sDF and sperm oxidative stress levels. Additional mechanisms to oxidative attack might be responsible for increased sDF in cancer patients. Because sperm oxidative stress might affect the outcomes of sperm cryopreservation, of cancer treatments and of sperm epigenoma, the detection of oxidative stress could be of help in managing the reproductive issues of cancer patients.

Postpubertal-type teratomas are rare malignant tumors derived from germ cell neoplasia in situ (GCNIS). This case report presents a rare instance of a retroperitoneal postpubertal-type teratoma as a late recurrence of a testicular germ cell tumor (GCT) that was initially diagnosed as a seminoma. A 48-year-old male who had undergone left inguinal orchidectomy for a testicular mass was diagnosed with a seminoma (stage I) six years prior and presented with an asymptomatic 6-cm retroperitoneal tumor near the left renal hilum. Initial blood tests at presentation for the retroperitoneal tumor were normal, except for a mild elevation of lactate dehydrogenase. Computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging, and fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET)/CT imaging revealed a well-defined tumor with calcification and high glucose metabolic activity. A CT-guided biopsy for the retroperitoneal tumor suggested a high-grade malignant tumor of neuroendocrine origin. The patient underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy, which resulted in tumor shrinkage and decreased metabolic activity. Subsequent surgical resection and histopathological examination revealed a postpubertal-type teratoma with a concomitant neuroendocrine tumor. A reexamination of the previous testicular tumor specimen revealed a small amount of embryonal carcinoma within the seminoma, indicating that the initial diagnosis should have been a mixed germ cell tumor rather than a pure seminoma. This explains the unusual recurrence pattern observed and highlights the importance of a thorough histological examination for testicular GCTs, as microscopic non-seminomatous components can significantly affect prognosis and recurrence patterns. When encountering suspected recurrences of GCNIS-derived GCTs, clinicians should consider the possibility of an initially undetected mixed GCT, particularly in cases with atypical presentation or recurrence patterns., Competing Interests: Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work., (Copyright © 2024, Aslanova et al.)

Purpose: One of the main issues in testicular germ cell tumors (TGCTs) management is to reduce the necessary amount of treatment to achieve cure. Excess treatment burden may arise from late diagnosis of the primary as well as from false positive or negative staging results. Correct imaging is of paramount importance for successful management of TGCT. The aim of this review is to point out the current state of the art as well as innovative developments in TGCT imaging on the basis of three common challenging clinical situations. Methods: A selective literature search was performed in PubMed, Medline as well as in recent conference proceedings. Results: Regarding small testicular lesions, recent studies using elastography, contrast-enhanced ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed promising data for differentiation between benign and malignant histology. For borderline enlarged lymph nodes FDG-PET-CT performance is unsatisfactory, promising new techniques as lymphotropic nanoparticle-enhanced MRI is the subject of research in this field. Regarding the assessment of postchemotherapeutic residual masses, the use of conventional computerized tomography (CT) together with serum tumor markers is still the standard of care. To avoid overtreatment in this setting, new imaging modalities like diffusion-weighted MRI and radiomics are currently under investigation. For follow-up of clinical stage I TGCTs, the use of MRI is non-inferior to CT while omitting radiation exposure. Conclusion: Further efforts should be made to refine imaging for TGCT patients, which is of high relevance for the guidance of treatment decisions as well as the associated treatment burdens and oncological outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Clinical stage I (CSI) testicular germ cell tumors (TGCT) represents disease confined to the testis without metastasis and CSIS is defined as persistently elevated tumor markers (TM) after orchiectomy, indicating subclinical metastatic disease. This study aims at assessing clinical characteristics and oncological outcome in CSIS. Methods: Data from five tertiary referring centers in Germany were screened. We defined correct classification of CSIS according to EAU guidelines. TM levels, treatment and relapse-free survival were assessed and differences between predefined groups (chemotherapy, correct/incorrect CSIS) were analyzed with Fisher's exact and Chi-square test. Results: Out of 2616 TGCT patients, 43 (1.6%) were CSIS. Thereof, 27 were correctly classified (cCSIS, 1.03%) and 16 incorrectly classified (iCSIS). TMs that defined cCSIS were in 12 (44.4%), 10 (37%), 3 (11.1%) and 2 (7.4%) patients AFP, ß-HCG, AFP plus ß-HCG and LDH, respectively. In the cCSIS group, six patients were seminoma and 21 non-seminoma. Treatment consisted of active surveillance, carboplatin-mono AUC7 and BEP (bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin). No difference between cCSIS and iCSIS with respect to applied chemotherapy was found (p = 0.830). 5-year relapse-free survival was 88.9% and three patients (11%) in the cCSIS group relapsed. All underwent salvage treatment (3xBEP) with no documented death. Conclusion: Around 1% of all TGCT were classified as cCSIS patients. Identification of cCSIS is of critical importance to avoid disease progression and relapses by adequate treatment. We report a high heterogeneity of treatment patterns, associated with excellent long-term survival irrespective of the initial treatment approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objectives: The impact of pure histological subtypes in testicular non-seminoma germ cell tumors on survival, specifically regarding pure embryonal carcinoma, is not well established. Therefore, this study aimed to test for differences between pure embryonal carcinoma and mixed germ cell tumor patients within stages I, II and III in a large population-based database. Materials and Methods: We relied on the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database (2004–2019) to identify testicular pure embryonal carcinoma vs. mixed germ cell tumor patients. Cumulative incidence plots depicted cancer-specific mortality that represented the main endpoint of interest. Multivariable competing risks regression models tested for differences between pure embryonal carcinoma and mixed germ cell tumor patients in analyses addressing cancer-specific mortality and adjusted for other-cause mortality. Results: Of 11,223 patients, 2473 (22%) had pure embryonal carcinoma. Pure embryonal carcinoma patients exhibited lower cancer-specific mortality relative to their mixed germ cell tumor counterparts for both stage III (13.9 vs. 19.4%; p < 0.01) and stage II (0.5 vs. 3.4%, p < 0.01), but not in stage I (0.9 vs. 1.6%, p = 0.1). In multivariable competing risks regression models, pure embryonal carcinoma exhibited more favorable cancer-specific mortality than mixed germ cell tumor in stage III (hazard ratio 0.71, p = 0.01) and stage II (hazard ratio 0.11, p < 0.01). Conclusions: Pure embryonal carcinoma exhibits a more favorable cancer-specific mortality profile relative to mixed germ cell tumor in stage II and III testicular cancers. Consequently, the presence of mixed germ cell tumor elements may be interpreted as a risk factor for cancer-specific survival.

Keywords: germ cell tumour; overall survival; testicular cancer; seminoma; non-seminoma germ cell tumour (NSGCT); non-seminoma EN germ cell tumour overall survival testicular cancer seminoma non-seminoma germ cell tumour (NSGCT) non-seminoma 77 85 9 10/26/22 20211210 NES 211210 1 Introduction Testicular cancer is the most common solid tumour in young males, between the ages of 18-45 years, but it remains a rare disease [[1]]. Seminomas patients have a fair prognosis at all stages and have a greater survival rate than non-seminoma patients. EP and BEP chemotherapy were widely used for both seminoma and non-seminoma patients, with more than 90% of patients in this cohort receiving this treatment. [Extracted from the article]

Germ-cell testicular cancer (GCTC) is a malignant neoplasm derived from the primordial germ cell. Although it accounts for approximately 1% of all malignancies in men, it is the most common cancer of younger male population, with the highest incidence between ages 15 and 35. Testicular cancer incidence rate has risen globally over the past several decades, with the average increase in the incidence of testicular cancer in Croatia of 7% per annum from the year 1983 to 2007. Two main groups are seminomas and non-seminomas, each accounting for 50% of cases, and they differ in treatment modalities and response to therapy. Despite increase in the incidence rate, a promising circumstance is that GCTC has become a model of curable cancer. Because of advances in diagnostic procedures, sophisticated radiation techniques and especially the introduction of cisplatin based chemotherapy protocols together with advanced postchemotherapy surgical techniques, curability is expected in about 95% of all patients diagnosed with testicular cancer and over 70% of patients with advanced disease. In this review, we will focus on treatment strategies of primary GCTC.

Although testicular germ cell tumor (TGCT) overall is highly curable, patients may experience late effects after treatment. An increased understanding of the mechanisms behind the development of TGCT may pave the way for better outcome for patients. To elucidate molecular changes prior to TGCT diagnosis we sequenced small RNAs in serum from 69 patients who were later diagnosed with TGCT and 111 matched controls. The deep RNA profiles, with on average 18 million sequences per sample, comprised of nine classes of RNA, including microRNA. We found that circulating RNA signals differed significantly between cases and controls regardless of time to diagnosis. Different levels of TSIX related to X-chromosome inactivation and TEX101 involved in spermatozoa production are among the interesting findings. The RNA signals differed between seminoma and non-seminoma TGCT subtypes, with seminoma cases showing lower levels of RNAs and non-seminoma cases showing higher levels of RNAs, compared with controls. The differentially expressed RNAs were typically associated with cancer related pathways. Our results indicate that circulating RNA profiles change during TGCT development according to histology and may be useful for early detection of this tumor type.

Objectives: We developed the first German evidence- and consensus-based clinical guideline on diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of germ cell tumours (GCT) of the testes in adult patients. We present the guideline content in 2 separate publications. The present second part summarizes therecommendations for the treatment of advanced disease stages and for the management of follow-up and late effects. Materials and Methods: An interdisciplinary panel of 42 experts including 1 patient representative developed the guideline content. Clinical recommendations and statements were based on scientific evidence and expert consensus. For this purpose, evidence tables for several review questions, which were based on systematic literature searches (last search in March 2018), were provided. Thirty-one experts, who were entitled to vote, rated the final clinical recommendations and statements. Results: Here we present the treatment recommendations separately for patients with metastatic seminoma and non-seminomatous GCT (stages IIA/B and IIC/III), for restaging and treatment of residual masses, and for relapsed and refractory disease stages. The recommendations also cover extragonadal and sex cord/stromal tumours, the management of follow-up and toxicity, quality-of-life aspects, palliative care, and supportive therapy. Conclusion: Physicians and other medical service providers who are involved in the diagnostics, treatment, and follow-up of GCT (all stages, outpatient and inpatient care as well as rehabilitation) are the users of the present guideline. The guideline also comprises quality indicators for measuring the implementation of the guideline recommendations in routine clinical care; these data will be presented in a future publication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Treatment of metastatic germ cell cancer (GCC) is based on the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) prognostic classification published in 1997. 5-year survival rates were reported to be 91%, 79%, and 48% for patients with good, intermediate and poor prognosis, respectively. However, treatment results may have improved over time due to cumulative experience, improved supportive care and modern-type chemotherapy. Methods: Patients with metastatic GCC who received cisplatin-based chemotherapy at two institutions in Munich between 2000 and 2013 were retrospectively studied. Clinical characteristics, treatment and outcomes were analyzed with respect to the IGCCG prognostic classification. Results: Of 225 patients (median age 35 years), 72 (32%) had seminoma (S) and 153 (68%) nonseminoma. 175 (78%), 30 (13%) and 20 patients (9%) had good, intermediate and poor prognosis according to the IGCCCG classification. The 2-year-progression free survival of patients with good, intermediate and poor prognosis was 91%, 83% and 37%, and the 5-year-overall survival (OS) was 98%, 96%, and 66%, respectively. There was no significant difference in the OS between patients in the good and intermediate prognosis group. Conclusion: Compared to data from the original IGCCCG classification system, the outcome of patients with metastatic GCC has considerably improved over time. While the prognosis of intermediate-risk patients is excellent, treatment in the poor-prognosis group remains to be improved. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Testicular germ cell tumours (TGCTs) are the most common cancer in young male adults (aged 15 to 40). Unlike most other cancer types, identification of molecular signatures in TGCT has rarely reported. In this study, we developed a novel integrative analysis framework to identify co-methylated and co-expressed genes [mRNAs and microRNAs (miRNAs)] modules in two TGCT subtypes: non-seminoma (NSE) and seminoma (SE). We first integrated DNA methylation and mRNA/miRNA expression data and then used a statistical method, CoMEx (Combined score of DNA Methylation and Expression), to assess differentially expressed and methylated (DEM) genes/miRNAs. Next, we identified co-methylation and co-expression modules by applying WGCNA (Weighted Gene Correlation Network Analysis) tool to these DEM genes/miRNAs. The module with the highest average Pearson's Correlation Coefficient (PCC) after considering all pair-wise molecules (genes/miRNAs) included 91 molecules. By integrating both transcription factor and miRNA regulations, we constructed subtype-specific regulatory networks for NSE and SE. We identified four hub miRNAs (miR-182-5p, miR-520b, miR-520c-3p, and miR-7-5p), two hub TFs (MYC and SP1), and two genes (RECK and TERT) in the NSE-specific regulatory network, and two hub miRNAs (miR-182-5p and miR-338-3p), five hub TFs (ETS1, HIF1A, HNF1A, MYC, and SP1), and three hub genes (CDH1, CXCR4, and SNAI1) in the SE-specific regulatory network. miRNA (miR-182-5p) and two TFs (MYC and SP1) were common hubs of NSE and SE. We further examined pathways enriched in these subtype-specific networks. Our study provides a comprehensive view of the molecular signatures and co-regulation in two TGCT subtypes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]