Search

Background: Adverse pregnancy outcomes, which can be caused by multiple factors, present a significant threat to the health of mothers and their babies. Cell‐free fetal DNA (cffDNA) from placental trophoblast cells might be able to reflect placental and fetal status. Previous studies have yielded controversial results regarding the association of FF or cffDNA with various adverse pregnancy outcomes. A previous study has attempted to systematically assess the association between low fetal fraction (FF) and adverse pregnancy outcomes, but it failed to perform quantitative analyses due to the few studies included. In the present study, we attempted to quantitatively assess the association of FF (or cffDNA) with adverse pregnancy outcomes and further analyze the causes of heterogeneity. Objectives: To investigate the association of high/low FF or cffDNA with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Search Strategy: We searched the databases of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science from January 1, 1990, to June 15, 2022 in this meta‐analysis. Selection Criteria: Studies on the relationships of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with FF or cell free DNA were included. Non‐English literature was excluded. Data Collection and Analysis: Data about pregnancy outcomes and cell free DNA were extracted and meta‐analyzed. Subgroup analysis was performed by different outcomes. Main Results: There were 11 studies included involving 8280 participants. No significant heterogeneity was observed among the studies (I2 = 27%, 25%), and a fixed‐effect model was used for weighted quantitative analysis. The results revealed that the FF or cffDNA during pregnancy was significantly associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes in pregnant women (OR = 1.57, 95% CI [1.24, 1.99], P = 0.233). The overall incidence of the maternal adverse outcomes was 8% (95% CI: 5–13). Subgroup analysis of different outcomes showed an evident association between low FF or cffDNA and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) (OR = 1.76, 95% CI [1.36, 2.27], P = 0.581). There was no evidence that the occurrence of spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB) and placental abnormality was associated with FF or cffDNA. No association was observed between low FF or cffDNA during pregnancy and adverse outcomes in fetuses (OR = 1.39, 95% CI [0.99, 1.94], P = 0.242). The overall incidence of adverse outcomes in fetuses was 8% (95% CI: 6–11). There were controversies over the association between high FF or cffDNA and HDP, and sPTB and small for gestational age infant, among different studies. Conclusions: Pregnant women with low FF or cffDNA during the first or second trimester of pregnancy have an overall increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes, especially HDP. However, the association between FF and various pregnancy outcomes needs to be further explored by more prospective studies. Synopsis: Pregnant women with low FF or cffDNA have an overall increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes, especially HDP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We reported a performance during an implementation of prenatal cell-free (cf) DNA screening using single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) approach in our accredited laboratory.Prospective audit with prompt intervention was set for the processing of 2,502 samples from singleton pregnancy from August 2017 to July 2019. Risks of trisomy 21 (T21), T18, T13, monosomy X (XO), and other sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs) were clarified by a proprietary bioinformatics algorithm.Laboratory failure occurred in 192 samples (7.7 %) as a result of inadequate sequencing (n=144), fundamental limitation of the testing (n=19), and obvious human error (n=29). Faulty setting of the calibration curve was the most common human error (n=22/29). After a redraw (n=110), 79 (71.8 %) were settled. Overall, 2,389/2,502 samples (95.5 %) were reportable. Thirty-five samples were high-risk for T21 (n=19), T18 (n=5), T13 (n=1), XO (n=3), and other SCAs (n=7), respectively. Positive predictive values calculated from either prenatal confirmatory tests or postnatal findings were 93.8 % (n=16), 100 % (n=4), 50 % (n=2), and 83.3 % (n=6) for T21, T18, XO, and other SCAs, respectively, with high sensitivity and specificity (>99.9 %). Vanishing twin was detected from 1 out of 4 samples with detected additional haplotypes.An overall performance of SNP-based prenatal cf-DNA screening during our initial implementation can be optimized with proactive approach. The technical know-how was a significant limiting factor for adopting the technology. The lessons learnt may be of interest to the academic laboratory considering adopting their own test instead of sending blood to a testing service of a supplier. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: This study was aimed at comparing the positive predictive value of a high‐risk cell‐free fetal DNA test result for sex chromosome aneuploidies (45,X0, 47,XXX, 47,XXY, and 47,XYY) and autosomal trisomies (T21, T18, and T13) with confirmatory tests in singleton pregnancies. Additionally, we identify the main reason for discordant and inconclusive results. Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched from 2017 for primary research articles on cell‐free fetal DNA testing of autosomal trisomies and sex chromosome aneuploidies in singleton pregnancies. The methodological characteristics and the statistical results of the studies were collected, and the risk of bias was assessed. Results: Fourteen studies were included. Among the autosomal trisomies, T21 had the highest, whereas T13 showed the lowest positive predictive values. As for the sex chromosome aneuploidies, the lowest values were found with 45,X0. Although discordant and inconclusive results were reported inconsistently, false positives were mainly caused by mosaicism, and inconclusive results were mostly secondary to a low fetal DNA fraction. Conclusion: Cell‐free fetal DNA is a reliable screening tool for autosomal trisomies. It is also useful for sex chromosome aneuploidies, although the positive predictive values are lower. A positive screening result should be followed with a confirmatory test. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the occurrence of clinically relevant (sub)microscopic chromosomal aberrations in fetuses with the nuchal translucency (NT) range from 3.0 to 3.4 mm, which would be potentially missed by cfDNA testing. Methods: A retrospective data analysis of 271 fetuses with NT between 3.0 and 3.4 mm and increased first trimester combined test (CT) risk in five cohorts of pregnant women referred for invasive testing and chromosomal microarray was performed. Results: A chromosomal aberration was identified in 18.8% fetuses (1:5; 51/271). In 15% (41/271) of cases, trisomy 21, 18, or 13 were found. In 0.7% (2/271) of cases, sex chromosome aneuploidy was found. In 1.1% (3/271) of cases, CNV >10 Mb was detected, which would potentially also be detected by genome-wide cfDNA testing. The residual risk for missing a submicroscopic chromosome aberration in the presented cohorts is 1.8% (1:54; 5/271). Conclusion: Our results indicate that a significant number of fetuses with increased CT risk and presenting NT of 3.0–3.4 mm carry a clinically relevant chromosomal abnormality other than common trisomy. Invasive testing should be offered, and counseling on NIPT should include the test limitations that may result in NIPT false-negative results in a substantial percentage of fetuses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective This study aimed to determine the diagnostic yield of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) performed in cases of fetal abnormalities detected during the third trimester of pregnancy. Study Design A retrospective review of medical records was conducted for women who underwent amniocentesis at or beyond 28 weeks of gestation between January 2017 and February 2023. CMA results of pregnancies with abnormal sonographic findings not detected before 28 weeks were included. Results A total of 482 fetuses met the inclusion criteria. The average maternal age was 31.3 years, and the average gestational age at amniocentesis was 32.3 weeks. The overall diagnostic yield of CMA was 6.2% (30 clinically significant copy number variations [CNVs]). The yield was 16.4% in cases with two or more fetal malformations, while cases with a single anomaly revealed a diagnostic yield of 7.3%. Cases presenting isolated polyhydramnios or isolated fetal growth restriction had a lower yield of 9.3 and 5.4%, respectively. Of the 30 clinically significant cases, 19 (or 63.4%) exhibited recurrent CNVs. The remaining 11 cases (or 36.6%) presented unique CNVs. The theoretical yield of Noninvasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) in our cohort is 2% for aneuploidy, which implies that it could potentially miss up to 70% of the significant findings that could be identified by CMA. In 80% of the fetuses (or 24 out of 30) with clinically significant CNVs, the structural abnormalities detected on fetal ultrasound examinations corresponded with the CMA results. Conclusion The 6.2% detection rate of significant CNVs in late-onset fetal anomalies confirms the value of CMA in third-trimester amniocentesis. The findings underscore the necessity of CMA for detecting CNVs potentially overlooked by NIPT and emphasize the importance of thorough genetic counseling. Key Points CMA yields 6.2% for third-trimester anomalies. NIPT may miss 70% of CMA findings. Ultrasound matched 80% of CMA results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of expanded noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for maternal copy number variations. Materials and methods: Expanded NIPT was used to detect CNVs ≥2 Mb at a whole-genome scale. The threshold of maternal deletion was copy numbers (CN) ≤ 1.6, and the threshold of maternal duplication was CN ≥ 2.4. Results: Of the 5440 pregnant women with successful expanded NIPT results, 28 maternal CNVs ≥2 Mb were detected in 27 pregnant women. Except for five cases reported as test failure, 23 CNVs ≥2 Mb were confirmed among the remaining 22 pregnant women by CNV-seq of maternal lymphocyte DNA. The genomic location, copy numbers and fragment size of maternal CNVs reported by expanded NIPT were consistent with the results of CNV-seq of maternal lymphocyte DNA. Conclusions: Maternal CNVs ≥2 Mb can be accurately evaluated according to the CN indicated by expanded NIPT results.

Abstract Background Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction (dPCR) presents a promising approach for quantifying DNA and analyzing copy number variants, particularly in non-invasive prenatal testing. This method offers a streamlined and time-efficient procedure in contrast to the widely used next-generation sequencing for non-invasive prenatal testing. Studies have reported encouraging results for dPCR in detecting fetal autosomal aneuploidies. Consequently, this systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of dPCR in screening for trisomy 21, 18, and 13. Methods A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Sciences, and Embase for relevant articles published up to December 30, 2023. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) was utilized for the quality assessment of the included articles. Furthermore, a bivariate random-effect regression model was used to conduct a meta-analysis on the utility of dPCR for trisomy 21 screening. Results A total of 9 articles were included in this review, with all of them assessing the utility of dPCR in trisomy 21 screening, and 2 and 1 studies conducting additional analysis on the screening abilities of dPCR for trisomy 18 and 13, respectively. A bivariate random-effects model calculated pooled sensitivity and specificity with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Meta-analysis of 6 studies comparing trisomy-21 screening with karyotyping demonstrated dPCR's pooled sensitivity of 98% [95% CI: 94 -100] and specificity of 99% [95% CI: 99 -100]. While conducting a meta-analysis for trisomy 13 and 18 proved impractical, reported values for sensitivity and specificity were favorable. Conclusions These findings suggest that dPCR holds promise as an effective tool for non-invasive prenatal testing, presenting a less time-consuming and intricate alternative to next-generation sequencing. However, further research is necessary to evaluate dPCR's applicability in clinical settings and to delineate its specific advantages over next-generation sequencing. This study contributes valuable insights into the potential of dPCR for enhancing prenatal screening methodologies. Trial registration The protocol of this study was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on 7/3/2024, with a registration code of CRD42024517523.

Background: Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction (dPCR) presents a promising approach for quantifying DNA and analyzing copy number variants, particularly in non-invasive prenatal testing. This method offers a streamlined and time-efficient procedure in contrast to the widely used next-generation sequencing for non-invasive prenatal testing. Studies have reported encouraging results for dPCR in detecting fetal autosomal aneuploidies. Consequently, this systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of dPCR in screening for trisomy 21, 18, and 13. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Sciences, and Embase for relevant articles published up to December 30, 2023. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) was utilized for the quality assessment of the included articles. Furthermore, a bivariate random-effect regression model was used to conduct a meta-analysis on the utility of dPCR for trisomy 21 screening. Results: A total of 9 articles were included in this review, with all of them assessing the utility of dPCR in trisomy 21 screening, and 2 and 1 studies conducting additional analysis on the screening abilities of dPCR for trisomy 18 and 13, respectively. A bivariate random-effects model calculated pooled sensitivity and specificity with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Meta-analysis of 6 studies comparing trisomy-21 screening with karyotyping demonstrated dPCR's pooled sensitivity of 98% [95% CI: 94 -100] and specificity of 99% [95% CI: 99 -100]. While conducting a meta-analysis for trisomy 13 and 18 proved impractical, reported values for sensitivity and specificity were favorable. Conclusions: These findings suggest that dPCR holds promise as an effective tool for non-invasive prenatal testing, presenting a less time-consuming and intricate alternative to next-generation sequencing. However, further research is necessary to evaluate dPCR's applicability in clinical settings and to delineate its specific advantages over next-generation sequencing. This study contributes valuable insights into the potential of dPCR for enhancing prenatal screening methodologies. Trial registration: The protocol of this study was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on 7/3/2024, with a registration code of CRD42024517523. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To explore the clinical significance of noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) in screening the rare autosomal trisomies (RAT) and chromosome copy number variation (CNV). Methods: The amniotic fluid karyotype analysis and single nucleotide polymorphism array were performed at the Prenatal Diagnostic Center of Quanzhou Women′s and Children′s Hospital from March 2017 to July 2023, in 108 cases that NIPS suggested high risk of RAT and (or) CNV. Results: In the 83 cases of NIPS suggesting high risk of RAT, 15 abnormal RAT were found by prenatal diagnosis, with a positive predictive value of 18.07% . There were 1 pathogenic copy number variants (pCNV), 9 variants of uncertain significance (VOUS), 4 loss of heterozygosity (LOH) and 1 VOUS+LOH. In 25 cases of NIPS suggesting high risk of CNV, 16 abnormal CNV were indicated by prenatal diagnosis, with a positive predictive value of 64.00%. There were 11 pCNV, 1 likely pathogenic copy number variants (lpCNV) and 4 VOUS. Conclusions: The positive predictive value of NIPS is not high in RAT, but the high risk of RAT is associated with the increasing adverse pregnancy outcomes. NIPS has a certain application value for the high risk screening of CNV. When NIPS suggested high risk of RAT and CNV, fetal prognosis should be evaluated in the combination of prenatal diagnosis with ultrasound follow-up, and monitoring and management of pregnancy should be strengthened. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Chromosomal abnormalities are the main cause of birth defects in newborns. Since the inception of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) technology, it has primarily been applied to the detection of common trisomy (T21, T18, T13). However, the application of NIPT in microdeletion and microduplication detection is still controversial. Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed the data of 68,588 cases that underwent NIPT at Ganzhou Maternal and Child Health Hospital in China. These data were used to evaluate the performance of NIPT in fetal chromosome microdeletion/microduplication detection and to investigate the key factors affecting the NIPT performance. Results: A total of 281 cases (0.41%) had positive NIPT results with copy number variants (CNVs), of which 161 were validated by karyotyping and chromosome microarray analysis (CMA). Among the 161 cases, 92 were confirmed as true positives through karyotyping or CMA, including 61 microdeletion cases and 31 microduplication cases, resulting in a positive predictive value (PPV) of 57.14%. Improvements in library construction methods increased the fraction of cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) from 13.76% to 18.44%, leading to a significant improvement in the detection rate (0.47% vs. 0.15%) and PPV (59.86% vs. 28.57%) of NIPT for CNVs. Conclusion: This study proved the robust performance of NIPT for fetal chromosome microdeletion/microduplication detection. In addition, the cffDNA fraction is a key factor influencing NIPT, with increased cffDNA fraction improving the performance of NIPT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To explore the application of microRNA (miRNA) expression profile in prenatal diagnosis of fetal congenital heart disease (CHD). Methods: 30 pregnant women diagnosed with CHD by ultrasound (case group) and 10 pregnant women who required amniocentesis (control group) were collected from January 2021 to December 2022 at Tianjin Central Hospital of Gynecology Obstetrics. The amniotic fluid supernatant of the two groups of pregnant women was sequenced by Illumina sequencing platform. All miRNAs of the two groups of pregnant women were normalized and the differentially expressed miRNAs were analyzed. The miRNA with P＜0.05 and |log2 FC|＞3 (Fold Change, FC) were selected from the differentially expressed miRNAs for further validation by real time fluorescence quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) in amniotic fluid and peripheral blood. The difference between miRNA sequencing and RT-qPCR in amniotic fluid was compared, and the miRNAs with consistent expression regulation direction in peripheral blood and amniotic fluid were selected. Results: A total of 138 differentially expressed miRNAs were found, of which 85 were up -regulated and 53 were down - regulated. Further, 15 differentially expressed miRNAs were selected, and the results of miRNA sequencing in amniotic fluid were consistent with those of RT -qPCR. There were two miRNAs with the same expression and regulation direction in peripheral blood and amniotic fluid, which were miR-222-3p and miR-189-5p, respectively. The expression of these two miRNAs in maternal blood of the case group was significantly higher than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (all P＜0.05). Conclusions: As a new serological marker, miRNA in maternal blood can be preliminarily applied to the screening of fetal CHD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ABSTRACT Prenatal genetic testing is to determine the possibility of the fetus having a genetic aberration or birth defect. Prenatal screening consists of serum analytes screening with or without nuchal translucency (NT) scanning or with cell‐free DNA (CfDNA) screening. Prenatal screening is recommended for all pregnant women regardless of the duration of pregnancy and maternal age or baseline risk. It is not advisable to screen with serum analytes and CfDNA concurrently to avoid discordant results. In developed countries, prenatal testing has been a part of routine antenatal care for a long time with adopting newer methods of screening and testing. In Bhutan, since the integration of the Safe Motherhood Program into primary healthcare in 1994, there has been an unprecedented improvement in obstetric care services. Almost all pregnant women attend antenatal and postnatal care, and 98.5% of deliveries are attended by trained health workers. The maternal mortality has reduced to 53 in 2023 from 770 per 100,000 live births in 1984 and the neonatal dealth has reduced to 15.2 per 1000 live births in 2023. However, despite improvements in the care of pregnant women, many babies are detected with congenital anomalies, syndromes, and birth defects during the postnatal period. Bhutan, being an underdeveloped country, could not initiate any form of prenatal testing program except for the anatomical scanning performed at 18–22 weeks of gestation. Early ultrasound dating scans, limited anomaly scanning, and growth scanning are offered to all pregnant women. There is a need to start centralized prenatal testing services in Bhutan to provide a comprehensive package of obstetric care to pregnant women. In addition, legal rights for parents to terminate severely deformed fetuses or severe genetic diseases before 24 weeks of pregnancy need to be established.

Abstract Trisomy 20 has been shown to be one of the most frequent rare autosomal trisomies in patients that undergo genome-wide noninvasive prenatal testing. Here, we describe the clinical outcomes of cases that screened positive for trisomy 20 following prenatal genome-wide cell-free (cf.) DNA screening. These cases are part of a larger cohort of previously published cases. Members of the Global Expanded NIPT Consortium were invited to submit details on their cases with a single rare autosomal aneuploidy following genome-wide cfDNA screening for retrospective analysis. Clinical details including patient demographics, test indications, diagnostic testing, and obstetric pregnancy outcomes were collected. Genome-wide cfDNA screening was conducted following site-specific laboratory procedures. Cases which screened positive for trisomy 20 (n = 10) were reviewed. Clinical outcome information was available for 90% (9/10) of our screen-positive trisomy 20 cases; the case without diagnostic testing ended in a fetal demise. Of the nine cases with outcome information, one was found to have a mosaic partial duplication (duplication at 20p13), rather than a full trisomy 20. Only one case in the study cohort had placental testing; therefore, confined placental mosaicism could not be ruled out in most cases. Adverse pregnancy outcomes were seen in half of the cases, which could suggest the presence of underlying confined placental mosaicism or mosaic/full fetal trisomy 20. Based on our limited series, the likelihood of true fetal aneuploidy is low but pregnancies may be at increased risk for adverse obstetric outcomes and may benefit from additional surveillance.

Qiang Ye,1 Guoping Huang,1 Qin Hu,1 Qin Man,2 Xiaoying Hao,3 Liangyan Liu,4 Qiang Zhong,1 Zhao Jin2 1Department of Clinical Laboratory, West China Second University Hospital, Southern Sichuan Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Zigong, Sichuan, 643000, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Prenatal Diagnosis Center, West China Second University Hospital, Southern Sichuan Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Zigong, Sichuan, 643000, People’s Republic of China; 3Department of Ultrasound, West China Second University Hospital, Southern Sichuan Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Zigong, Sichuan, 643000, People’s Republic of China; 4Department of Obstetrics, West China Second University Hospital, Southern Sichuan Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Zigong, Sichuan, 643000, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Zhao Jin, Department of Prenatal Diagnosis Center, West China Second University Hospital, Southern Sichuan Women’s and Children’s Hospital, No. 49 Da Huang Tong Road, Da’an District, Zigong, Sichuan, 643000, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86-13990094008, Email Jinzhao_work@163.comObjective: This study was to evaluate the performance of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in detecting fetal chromosome disorders in pregnant women.Methods: From October 1st, 2017, to December 31th, 2022, a total of 15,304 plasma cell free DNA-NIPT samples were collected for fetal chromosome disorders screening. The results of NIPT were validated by confirmatory invasive testing or clinical outcome follow-up. Further, NIPT performance between low-risk and high-risk groups, as well as singleton pregnancy and twin pregnancy groups was compared. Besides, analysis of 111 false-positive cases was performed.Results: Totally, NIPT was performed on 15,086 eligible venous blood samples, of which 179 (1.19%) showed positive NIPT results and 68 were further validated to be true positive samples via confirmatory invasive testing or follow-up of clinical outcomes. For common chromosome aneuploidies, sex chromosome abnormalities (SCA) and other chromosomal aneuploidies, the detection sensitivities of NIPT were all 100%, the specificities were 99.87%, 99.70%, and 99.68% and the positive predictive values (PPVs) were 65.45%, 31.82%, and 10.91%, respectively. No statistically significant variance in detection performance was observed among 2987 high-risk and 12,099 low-risk subjects, as well as singleton and twin pregnancy subjects. The concentration of cell-free fetal DNA of 111 false-positive cases ranged from 5.5% to 33.7%, which was higher than the minimum requirement of NIPT.Conclusion: With stringent protocol, NIPT shows high sensitivity and specificity for detecting fetal chromosome disorders in a large-scale clinical service, helping improving overall pregnancy management.Keywords: noninvasive prenatal testing, fetal chromosome disorders, high risk, twin pregnancy, performance evaluation

ObjectiveTwins account for approximately 1 in 30 live births in the United States. However, there are limited clinical experience studies published in noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for detecting aneuploidies in twins. This study reports the performance of an SNP-based NIPT in the largest cohort with known outcomes for high-risk aneuploidy results.MethodThis is a retrospective analysis of 18,984 results from commercial single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-based NIPT tests performed in twins between October 2, 2017 and December 31, 2019. Follow-up for all 211 high-risk cases was solicited.ResultsFollow-up outcomes were obtained in 105 cases. Positive predictive values (PPVs) for high-risk results were 88.7% (63/71, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 79.0%-95.0%) for trisomy 21% and 72.7% (8/11, 95% CI: 39.0%-94.0%) for trisomy 18. The results were stratified into monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ). The PPVs in MZ were 100% for both trisomy 21 (4/4, 95% CI: 40%-100%) and trisomy 18 (1/1, 95% CI: 2.5%-100%). No trisomy 13 cases were detected in the MZ group. The PPVs in DZ were 88.1% (59/67, 95% CI: 77.8%-94.7%), 70.0% (7/10, 95% CI: 34.8%-93.3%), and 66.7% (2/3, 95% CI: 9.4%-99.2%) for trisomy 21, trisomy 18, and trisomy 13, respectively.ConclusionThe performance of SNP-based NIPT in this large twin cohort was comparable to previously reported twin NIPT studies. SNP-based NIPT allows for zygosity-based PPV assessment.

Trisomy 20 has been shown to be one of the most frequent rare autosomal trisomies in patients that undergo genome-wide noninvasive prenatal testing. Here, we describe the clinical outcomes of cases that screened positive for trisomy 20 following prenatal genome-wide cell-free (cf.) DNA screening. These cases are part of a larger cohort of previously published cases. Members of the Global Expanded NIPT Consortium were invited to submit details on their cases with a single rare autosomal aneuploidy following genome-wide cfDNA screening for retrospective analysis. Clinical details including patient demographics, test indications, diagnostic testing, and obstetric pregnancy outcomes were collected. Genome-wide cfDNA screening was conducted following site-specific laboratory procedures. Cases which screened positive for trisomy 20 (n = 10) were reviewed. Clinical outcome information was available for 90% (9/10) of our screen-positive trisomy 20 cases; the case without diagnostic testing ended in a fetal demise. Of the nine cases with outcome information, one was found to have a mosaic partial duplication (duplication at 20p13), rather than a full trisomy 20. Only one case in the study cohort had placental testing; therefore, confined placental mosaicism could not be ruled out in most cases. Adverse pregnancy outcomes were seen in half of the cases, which could suggest the presence of underlying confined placental mosaicism or mosaic/full fetal trisomy 20. Based on our limited series, the likelihood of true fetal aneuploidy is low but pregnancies may be at increased risk for adverse obstetric outcomes and may benefit from additional surveillance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Due to recent news coverage of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) technology, in combination with an increase in political rhetoric around women's reproductive health and choice, I explore how language is used for promotional materials of the top 10 NIPT brands in the U.S. and convey dominant/hegemonic messages of comfort, confidence, and trustworthiness despite concerns about NIPT technology. A reflexive thematic analysis showed patterns of reliance on discourses on motherhood, parenting, and reproduction to advertise products and, conversely, a lack of the "full picture" of prenatal testing on company websites. From these results, we can gather that the potential interpretation of the website language could have more significant implications, like the premature termination of pregnancies, the increased chance of depression, and over-reliance on health information listed on the Internet. Ultimately, the language on NIPT company websites may influence decision-making and reinforce the more "powerful" messages that could potentially harm women. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The introduction of noninvasive prenatal testing has resulted in substantial reductions to previously accepted false-positive rates of prenatal screening. Despite this, the possibility of false-positive results remains a challenging consideration in clinical practice, particularly considering the increasing uptake of genome-wide noninvasive prenatal testing, and the subsequent increased proportion of high-risk results attributable to various biological events besides fetal aneuploidy. Confined placental mosaicism, whereby chromosome anomalies exclusively affect the placenta, is perhaps the most widely accepted cause of false-positive noninvasive prenatal testing. There remains, however, a substantial degree of ambiguity in the literature pertaining to the clinical ramifications of confined placental mosaicism and its potential association with placental insufficiency, and consequentially adverse pregnancy outcomes including fetal growth restriction. Other causes of false-positive noninvasive prenatal testing include vanishing twin syndrome, in which the cell-free DNA from a demised aneuploidy-affected twin triggers a high-risk result, technical failures, and maternal origins of abnormal cell-free DNA such as uterine fibroids or unrecognized mosaicisms. Most concerningly, maternal malignancies are also a documented cause of false-positive screening results. In this review, we compile what is currently known about the various causes of false-positive noninvasive prenatal testing. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background To evaluate the clinical significance of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for detecting fetal sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs) in Korean pregnant women. Methods We retrospectively analyzed NIPT data from 9,176 women with singleton pregnancies referred to the CHA Biotech genome diagnostics center. Cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) was extracted from maternal peripheral blood, and high-throughput massively parallel sequencing was conducted. Subsequently, the positive NIPT results for SCA were validated via karyotype and chromosomal microarray analyses. Results Overall, 46 cases were SCA positive after NIPT, including 20, 12, 8, and 6 for Turner, triple X, Klinefelter, and Jacob syndromes, respectively. Among 37 women with invasive prenatal diagnosis, 19 had true positive NIPT results. The overall positive predictive value (PPV) of NIPT for detecting SCAs was 51.35%. The PPV was 18.75% for Turner, 88.89% for triple X, 71.43% for Klinefelter, and 60.00% for Jacob’s syndromes. NIPT accuracy for detecting sex chromosome trisomies was higher than that for sex chromosome monosomy (P = 0.002). No significant correlation was observed between fetal SCA incidence and maternal age (P = 0.914), except for the borderline significance of Jacob’s syndrome (P = 0.048). No significant differences were observed when comparing NIPT and karyotyping validation for fetal SCA according to pregnancy characteristics. Conclusion Our data suggest that NIPT can reliably screen for SCAs, and it performed better in predicting sex chromosome trisomies compared with monosomy X. No correlation was observed between maternal age and fetal SCA incidence, and no association was observed between different pregnancy characteristics. The accuracy of these findings requires improvements; however, our study provides an important reference for clinical genetic counseling and further management. Larger scale studies, considering confounding factors, are required for accurate evaluation.

Xianqing Hu,1 Yanjun Hu,1 Hai Wang,2 Caicha Yu,3 Jiayong Zheng,2 Hongping Zhang,1 Jianqiong Zheng1 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Clinical Institute Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou People’s Hospital, Wenzhou Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Wenzhou, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Fetal Medicine and Prenatal Diagnosis, The Third Clinical Institute Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou People’s Hospital, Wenzhou Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Wenzhou, People’s Republic of China; 3Department of Ultrasonography, The Third Clinical Institute Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou People’s Hospital, Wenzhou Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Wenzhou, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Jianqiong Zheng; Hongping Zhang, Email zjq1980120@163.com; 413599343@qq.comObjective: This study aimed to assess the utility of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) and noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in detecting clinically significant chromosomal abnormalities among fetuses presenting ultrasonic soft markers (USMs).Methods: A retrospective observational study, spanning from January 1, 2019, to September 30, 2022, enrolled 539 singleton pregnant women with fetal USMs at our center. Of these, 418 cases (77.6%) underwent NIPT, while 121 cases (22.4%) opted for invasive prenatal diagnosis post-appropriate genetic counseling. Cases with high-risk NIPT results proceeded to invasive prenatal diagnosis, where conventional karyotyping and CMA were concurrently performed. Further stratification was done based on the number of USMs, classifying cases into single-USM and multiple-USM groups.Results: Of the 24 cases (4.5%) exhibiting abnormal findings, 17 presented numerical chromosomal abnormalities, 2 featured clinically significant copy number variations (CNVs), 3 showed variants of unknown significance (VOUS), 1 displayed LOH, and 1 exhibited chromosome nine inversion. Notably, 18 cases (75%) theoretically detectable by karyotyping (eg, sizes above 10Mb) and 16 cases (66.7%) detectable by NIPT for five common aneuploidies were identified. Six submicroscopic findings (25%) were exclusively detectable by CMA. The predominant clinically relevant aberrations were observed in the thickened nuchal-translucency (TNT) group (9/35, 25.7%), followed by the multiple soft markers group (3/32, 9.3%). In the NIPT group, the false positive rate was 1.22%, and the false negative rate was 0%.Conclusion: The prevalence of chromosome aneuploidy exceeded that of submicroscopic chromosomal imbalance in pregnant women with fetal USMs. NIPT demonstrated efficacy, particularly for soft markers like echogenic intracardiac focus. However, for those with TNT and multiple soft markers, invasive prenatal diagnosis, including CMA testing, is recommended as the primary investigative approach.Keywords: chromosomal microarray analysis, karyotype, noninvasive prenatal testing, ultrasonic soft markers, prenatal diagnosis

In this study we wanted to determine the performance of a paired-end sequencing-based noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) assay in the detection of common fetal trisomies in twin pregnancy samples. Samples from patients with a twin pregnancy were collected from at least 10 weeks of gestation and analyzed at a single prenatal center in Germany. Results of Anomaly Detected (i.e., high risk) or No Anomaly Detected (i.e., low risk) for trisomy 21, trisomy 18, or trisomy 13 were reported. Follow-up confirmatory outcomes were requested for all cases. A total of 1,658 patients with twin pregnancies submitted samples during the study period; only two of these samples failed resulting in a low failure rate of 0.12%. Of the remaining 1,656 cases, there were 1,625 (98.1%) low-risk and 31 (1.9%) high-risk NIPT samples in our cohort. Of these, follow-up information was available for 301 (18.5%) of the low-risk samples and 19 (61.3%) of the high-risk samples. All of the low-risk cases with follow-up were determined to be true negatives giving an estimated negative predictive value of 100%. Seventeen of the 19 high-risk samples with follow-up were true positives, resulting in an overall positive predictive value of 89.5%. Sensitivities of > 99.9% were noted for both trisomy 21 and trisomy 18, with high specificities of ≥ 99.7% observed for all three trisomies. In conclusion, our study showed strong performance of the NIPT assay in the detection of common fetal trisomies in twin pregnancy samples, with high sensitivities, specificities, and positive predictive values observed based on known clinical outcomes along with a low failure rate.

Background: To evaluate the clinical significance of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for detecting fetal sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs) in Korean pregnant women. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed NIPT data from 9,176 women with singleton pregnancies referred to the CHA Biotech genome diagnostics center. Cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) was extracted from maternal peripheral blood, and high-throughput massively parallel sequencing was conducted. Subsequently, the positive NIPT results for SCA were validated via karyotype and chromosomal microarray analyses. Results: Overall, 46 cases were SCA positive after NIPT, including 20, 12, 8, and 6 for Turner, triple X, Klinefelter, and Jacob syndromes, respectively. Among 37 women with invasive prenatal diagnosis, 19 had true positive NIPT results. The overall positive predictive value (PPV) of NIPT for detecting SCAs was 51.35%. The PPV was 18.75% for Turner, 88.89% for triple X, 71.43% for Klinefelter, and 60.00% for Jacob's syndromes. NIPT accuracy for detecting sex chromosome trisomies was higher than that for sex chromosome monosomy (P = 0.002). No significant correlation was observed between fetal SCA incidence and maternal age (P = 0.914), except for the borderline significance of Jacob's syndrome (P = 0.048). No significant differences were observed when comparing NIPT and karyotyping validation for fetal SCA according to pregnancy characteristics. Conclusion: Our data suggest that NIPT can reliably screen for SCAs, and it performed better in predicting sex chromosome trisomies compared with monosomy X. No correlation was observed between maternal age and fetal SCA incidence, and no association was observed between different pregnancy characteristics. The accuracy of these findings requires improvements; however, our study provides an important reference for clinical genetic counseling and further management. Larger scale studies, considering confounding factors, are required for accurate evaluation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

AbstractBackgroundMethodsResultsConclusionNoninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) designed to screen for fetal genetic conditions, is increasingly being implemented as a part of routine prenatal care screening in the United States (US). However, these advances in reproductive genetic technology necessitate empirical research on the ethical and social implications of NIPT among populations underrepresented in genetic research, particularly Black women with sickle cell disease (SCD).Forty (N = 40) semi-structured interviews were conducted virtually with Black women in the US (19 participants with SCD; 21 participants without SCD) from June 2021 to January 2022. We employed a qualitative approach to examine the study participants’ perceptions of the potential advancement of NIPT for screening SCD in the fetus. Data were analyzed using NVivo 12 qualitative software.The themes revealed the complexities involving the intersectional lived experiences of SCD, prenatal care, lack of synergy among health providers, and NIPT decision-making. The results further revealed that even when Black women have shared commonalities in their lived experiences while navigating SCD and motherhood, their perceptions of NIPT screening technologies are divergent.Expanding the ethical discourse on the social implications of NIPT is critical to fully elucidate how Black women perceive NIPT’s utility, particularly as NIPT advances to screen for SCD in the fetus. Neglecting to include Black women with genetic conditions in empirical studies on NIPT may contribute to ongoing health inequities and limit and constrain reproductive choices among Black women with and without SCD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this study we wanted to determine the performance of a paired-end sequencing-based noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) assay in the detection of common fetal trisomies in twin pregnancy samples. Samples from patients with a twin pregnancy were collected from at least 10 weeks of gestation and analyzed at a single prenatal center in Germany. Results of Anomaly Detected (i.e., high risk) or No Anomaly Detected (i.e., low risk) for trisomy 21, trisomy 18, or trisomy 13 were reported. Follow-up confirmatory outcomes were requested for all cases. A total of 1,658 patients with twin pregnancies submitted samples during the study period; only two of these samples failed resulting in a low failure rate of 0.12%. Of the remaining 1,656 cases, there were 1,625 (98.1%) low-risk and 31 (1.9%) high-risk NIPT samples in our cohort. Of these, follow-up information was available for 301 (18.5%) of the low-risk samples and 19 (61.3%) of the high-risk samples. All of the low-risk cases with follow-up were determined to be true negatives giving an estimated negative predictive value of 100%. Seventeen of the 19 high-risk samples with follow-up were true positives, resulting in an overall positive predictive value of 89.5%. Sensitivities of > 99.9% were noted for both trisomy 21 and trisomy 18, with high specificities of ≥ 99.7% observed for all three trisomies. In conclusion, our study showed strong performance of the NIPT assay in the detection of common fetal trisomies in twin pregnancy samples, with high sensitivities, specificities, and positive predictive values observed based on known clinical outcomes along with a low failure rate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Circulating fetal cells isolated from maternal blood can be used for prenatal testing, representing a safe alternative to invasive testing. The present study investigated the potential of cell-based noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for diagnosing monogenic disorders dependent on the mode of inheritance. Methods: Maternal blood samples were collected from women opting for prenatal diagnostics for specific monogenic disorders (N = 7). Fetal trophoblasts were enriched and stained using magnetic activated cell sorting and isolated by fluorescens activated single-cell sorting. Individual cells were subject to whole genome amplification, and cells of fetal origin were identified by DNA-profiling using short tandem repeat markers. The amplified fetal DNA was input for genetic testing for autosomal dominant-, autosomal recessive-, X-linked and repeat expansion disorders by direct variant analysis and haplotyping. The cell-based NIPT results were compared with those of invasive testing. Results: In two cases at risk of skeletal dysplasia, caused by variants in the FGFR3 gene (autosomal dominant disorders), cell-based NIPT correctly stated an affected fetus, but allelic dropout of the normal alleles were observed in both cases. Cell-based NIPT gave an accurate result in two cases at risk of autosomal recessive disorders, where the parents carried either different diastrophic dysplasia causing variants in the SLC26A2 gene or the same cystic fibrosis disease-causing variant in the CFTR gene. Cell-based NIPT accurately identified an affected male fetus in a pregnancy at risk of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD gene, X-linked recessive disorders). In two cases at risk of the myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DMPK gene, repeat expansion disorder), cell-based NIPT correctly detected an affected and an unaffected fetus, respectively. Discussion: Circulating fetal cells can be used to detect both maternally- and paternally inherited monogenic disorders irrespective of the type of variant, however, the risk of allelic dropout must be considered. We conclude that the clinical interpretation of the cell-based NIPT result thus varies depending on the disorders' mode of inheritance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS), using placental cell‐free DNA from a maternal blood sample, is currently the most sensitive and specific screening tool for detecting common fetal aneuploidies. The aim of this study was to compare the rates of "atypical" single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)‐based NIPS results and subsequent pregnancy outcomes between Arab American and non‐Arab American patients. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of pregnant Arab and non‐Arab American patients who had SNP‐based NIPS performed between September 2018 and January 2021 at an urban health system in Michigan. The rate of "atypical" results and other perinatal outcomes were compared between groups using descriptive statistics. "Atypical" results due to multifetal gestations, either undisclosed or unknown at time of ordering, were excluded. Five thousand eight hundred and seventy‐three patients underwent SNP‐based NIPS: 771 (13.1%) were identified as Arab American, 5102 (86.9%) were non‐Arab American, and 49 (0.8%) patients received "atypical" results. Arab patients represented only 13.1% of patients screened (771/5873) but had a significantly higher rate of "atypical" results than non‐Arab American patients (17/771 [2.2%] vs. 32/5102 [0.6%]; p < 0.001). Of the 17 Arab patients with "atypical" results, 9 (52.9%) were in known consanguineous relationships. No major congenital anomalies or chromosomal aberrations were identified for any patients who had "atypical" results, and no significant differences in other perinatal outcomes were observed between Arab and non‐Arab American patients. A better understanding of the association between consanguinity and "atypical" SNP‐based NIPS results would aid in appropriate test selection and interpretation and may help physicians and genetic counselors provide better perinatal counseling and follow‐up care for patients in consanguineous relationships. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This study examined how clients' selection and preference for noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for aneuploidy changed with genetic counseling (GC) performed by certified geneticists at a primary hospital specializing in obstetrics, where other multiple prenatal genetic tests options were available. Methods: A total of 334 couples who underwent GC between 2017 and 2019 were included in the study. The average age of the pregnant women who underwent GC was 35.1 years. Results: Among the 95 couples (28.4%) who wanted NIPT at the start of GC, 10 (10.5%) switched to other tests, and 4 (4.2%) chose not to undergo any test. Among the 106 (31.7%) couples who wanted the combination of ultrasonography and the serum marker test, 12 (11.3%) chose not to undergo the test. Among the 92 (27.5%) couples who were undecided before GC, 21 (22.8%) wanted NIPT, 31 (33.7%) selected combined tests, and 18 (19.6%) did not undergo any test. Conclusion: We have demonstrated the significance of GC before prenatal genetic testing under widespread use of NIPT. Ideally, obstetric facilities should provide GC, or at least, pre‐counseling at their own facilities, and offer multiple prenatal genetic testing options or refer to other facilities for the same. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The genetic etiology was comprehensively tested by noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT), copy number variation sequencing (CNV-seq) and chromosome karyotype analysis in a fetus case with the critical risk of Down′s screening (1/476) in the second trimester of pregnancy. In this fetus, ultrasound found the choroid plexus cyst of left side, and NIPT indicated the high risk of 8.49 Mb deletion of 5p15.2-p15.33. The deletion of p.15.2-p.15.33 of chromosome 5 was indicated by CNV-seq, which was involved in the key regions related to Cridu-Chat syndrome. Chromosome karyotype analysis showed that the fetal karyotype was 46,XX,der(5)t(5;21) (p15.2;q11.1),-21,+mar dn [85], and that the parental karyotypes were normal, which suggested that the abnormity of fetal karyotype was a new mutation. In this study, a fetus with complex karyotype of Cri-du-Chat syndrome was diagnosed by the multiple prenatal methods. This case enriches the types of chromosome variation in Cri-du-Chat syndrome and demonstrates the importance of multi-method screening and diagnosis for the prevention of birth defects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although nearly all noninvasive prenatal testing is currently based on analyzing circulating maternal cell-free DNA, the technical methods usedvary considerably. We review the different methods. Based on validation trials and clinical experience, there are mostly relatively small differences in screening performance for trisomies 21, 18, and 13 in singleton pregnancies. Recent reports show low no-call rates for all methods, diminishing its importance when choosing a laboratory. However, method can be an important consideration for twin pregnancies, screening for sex chromosome abnormalities, microdeletion syndromes, triploidy, molar pregnancies, rare autosomal trisomies, and segmental imbalances, and detecting maternal chromosome abnormalities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Considering the diagnostic limitations of cfDNA-based noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT), scientists have long been interested in isolating and analyzing rare intact fetal and trophoblast cells from maternal blood or endocervical samples to diagnose fetal genetic conditions. These cells may be scarce and difficult to isolate, but they are a direct source of pure fetal genetic material. In this review, we summarize the history of cell-based NIPT, present an updated review on its current developments, evaluate its genetic diagnostic potential, and discuss its future prospects for clinical use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening has high detection for the common fetal autosomal aneuploidies, but is not diagnostic. The positive predictive value should be utilized in counseling after a positive cell-free DNA screen, and diagnostic testing should be offered for confirmation. cfDNA screening does not report a result in ~3% of cases; nonreportable results indicate an increased risk for aneuploidy and some adverse perinatal outcomes. False-positive cfDNA screening occurs due to confined placental mosaicism, maternal copy number variants, mosaicism, and cancer. Pretest education and counseling should be provided with emphasis on the potential benefits, risks, and limitations before cfDNA screening. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is increasingly used in the clinical prenatal screening of twin pregnancies, and its screening performance for chromosomal abnormalities requires further evaluation. For twin pregnancies with indications for prenatal diagnosis, there is a lack of clinical data to assess the prenatal diagnosis rate (PDR). The aim of this study was to evaluate the screening performance of NIPT for foetal chromosomal abnormalities in twin pregnancies and the PDR in the second and third trimesters. Methods Ultrasound scans were carried out for all twin pregnancies between 11 and 13+ 6 gestational weeks. For twin pregnancies with nuchal translucency thickness˂3.0 mm and no foetal structural malformations, NIPT was performed after blood sampling, followed by routine ultrasound monitoring. Women with twin pregnancies who underwent NIPT at the prenatal diagnostic centre of Xiangya Hospital from January 2018 to May 2022 were included in the study. Genetic counselling was offered to each pregnant woman when the NIPT result indicated a high risk of abnormalities or abnormal ultrasonographic (USG) findings were detected. We followed up twin pregnancies for NIPT results, USG findings, prenatal diagnosis results and pregnancy outcomes. Results In 1754 twin pregnancies, the sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of NIPT for trisomy 21 were 100%, 99.9% and 75%, and the corresponding values for sex chromosome aneuploidy (SCA) were 100%, 99.9% and 50%, respectively. For the 14 twin pregnancies for which the NIPT results indicated a high risk of abnormalities, the PDR was 78.6% (11/14). For the 492 twin pregnancies for which the NIPT results indicated a low risk of abnormalities, the rate of USG findings in the second and third trimesters was 39.4% (194/492); of these pregnancies, prenatal diagnosis was recommended for 16.7% (82/492), but it was actually performed in only 8.3% (41/492), and the PDR was 50% (41/82). There was no significant difference in the PDR between the NIPT high-risk and low-risk groups. Conclusions The screening performance of NIPT for SCA in twin pregnancies needs to be further evaluated. When abnormal NIPT results or USG findings are used as the main prenatal diagnostic indicator in the second and third trimesters, the PDR is poor.

A six-fold increase in congenital heart defects (CHD) exists among monochorionic (MC) twins compared to singleton or dichorionic twin pregnancies. Though MC twins share an identical genotype, discordant phenotypes related to CHD and other malformations have been described, with reported rates of concordance for various congenital anomalies at less than 20%. Our objective was to characterize the frequency and spectrum of CHD in a contemporary cohort of MC twins, coupled with genetic and clinical variables to provide insight into risk factors and pathophysiology of discordant CHD in MC twins. Retrospective analysis of all twins receiving prenatal fetal echocardiography at a single institution from January 2010 -March 2020 (N = 163) yielded 23 MC twin pairs (46 neonates) with CHD (n = 5 concordant CHD, n = 18 discordant CHD). The most common lesions were septal defects (60% and 45.5% in concordant and discordant cohorts, respectively) and right heart lesions (40% and 18.2% in concordant and discordant cohorts, respectively). Diagnostic genetic testing was abnormal for 20% of the concordant and 5.6% of the discordant pairs, with no difference in rate of abnormal genetic results between the groups (p = 0.395). No significant association was found between clinical risk factors and development of discordant CHD (p>0.05). This data demonstrates the possibility of environmental and epigenetic influences versus genotypic factors in the development of discordant CHD in monochorionic twins.

Background: To evaluate the clinical performance and clinical implementation of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) using fetal fraction (FF) enrichment. Methods: Both standard NIPT and NIPT with FF enrichment were performed concurrently to 277 clinical samples. Results: On average, the FF of each sample processed by NIPT with FF enrichment was 1.9-fold higher than without enrichment. 88% (43/49) of samples with low FF in standard NIPT were recovered by the enrichment method. 11 more copy number variants (CNVs) which were confirmed by prenatal diagnosis were detected by NIPT with FF enrichment. NIPT with FF enrichment generated a positive predictive value of 75% for CNVs (≥3 Mb and 22q11.2 ≥1 Mb). NIPT with FF enrichment showed similar performance in the detection of common trisomy when compared with the standard method. Pregnant women with higher body mass indexes experienced significantly greater enriching effects on FF from NIPT with the enrichment protocol. Conclusions: NIPT with FF enrichment effectively elevated the FF level. This method is capable of detecting significantly more concordant CNVs with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 75%. Our data suggest that this enhanced version of NIPT can be used to improve the screening performance of clinically significant fetal CNVs but it should only be recommended when comprehensive counseling is available.

Introduction: Circulating fetal cells isolated from maternal blood can be used for prenatal testing, representing a safe alternative to invasive testing. The present study investigated the potential of cell-based noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for diagnosing monogenic disorders dependent on the mode of inheritance.Methods: Maternal blood samples were collected from women opting for prenatal diagnostics for specific monogenic disorders (N = 7). Fetal trophoblasts were enriched and stained using magnetic activated cell sorting and isolated by fluorescens activated single-cell sorting. Individual cells were subject to whole genome amplification, and cells of fetal origin were identified by DNA-profiling using short tandem repeat markers. The amplified fetal DNA was input for genetic testing for autosomal dominant-, autosomal recessive-, X-linked and repeat expansion disorders by direct variant analysis and haplotyping. The cell-based NIPT results were compared with those of invasive testing.Results: In two cases at risk of skeletal dysplasia, caused by variants in the FGFR3 gene (autosomal dominant disorders), cell-based NIPT correctly stated an affected fetus, but allelic dropout of the normal alleles were observed in both cases. Cell-based NIPT gave an accurate result in two cases at risk of autosomal recessive disorders, where the parents carried either different diastrophic dysplasia causing variants in the SLC26A2 gene or the same cystic fibrosis disease-causing variant in the CFTR gene. Cell-based NIPT accurately identified an affected male fetus in a pregnancy at risk of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD gene, X-linked recessive disorders). In two cases at risk of the myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DMPK gene, repeat expansion disorder), cell-based NIPT correctly detected an affected and an unaffected fetus, respectively.Discussion: Circulating fetal cells can be used to detect both maternally- and paternally inherited monogenic disorders irrespective of the type of variant, however, the risk of allelic dropout must be considered. We conclude that the clinical interpretation of the cell-based NIPT result thus varies depending on the disorders’ mode of inheritance.

To evaluate whether the fetal fraction of cell-free DNA at the first and second trimesters is associated with spontaneous preterm birth. This was a retrospective cohort study with singleton pregnancies who underwent noninvasive prenatal testing. According to pregnancy outcome, eligible patients were divided into a delivery group ≥37 weeks of pregnancy (term group) and <37 weeks of pregnancy (spontaneous preterm group). Stepwise linear regression was used to identify maternal characteristics associated with the fetal fraction of cell‐free DNA. Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association between the fetal fraction of cell-free DNA and spontaneous preterm birth, adjusted for confounding factors. 14,020 cases were included in the study, 13292 cases (94.81%) in the term group and 728 cases (5.19%) in the spontaneous preterm group. The cell-free fraction of fetal DNA was inversely correlated with maternal age and body mass index. Positively correlated with gestational age, fertility, and assisted reproductive technology. After adjusting for the covariates, logistic regression analysis revealed no statistically significant association between the fetal fraction of cell-free DNA and spontaneous preterm birth. In our original study, we found no association between the fetal fraction on NIPT and subsequent spontaneous preterm birth. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) using cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is typically carried out to screen for common fetal chromosomal anomalies, with the option to screen for a wider range of chromosomal changes (expanded NIPT) becoming increasingly available. However, little is known about pregnant patients' attitudes and preferences regarding expanded NIPT. Methods: To address this gap, we surveyed general-risk patients having first-tier cfDNA screening at a private prenatal clinic on their expectations for expanded NIPT. Patients were asked questions regarding their current pregnancy and previous pregnancy history, their opinions on fetal DNA screenings during pregnancy and incidental findings, information and opinions on financial resources for NIPT, as well as socio-cultural questions to determine patient demographics. Results: Of the 200 survey participants, the majority were educated, self-reported as white, had a higher than average income, and reported no aneuploidy risk factors. When asked what information they would like to receive from cfDNA screening, the vast majority of participants wanted all information available that could have an immediate impact on fetal health (88%) or an immediate impact on infant health from birth (82%). Many participants also wanted information that could have a future impact on the child's health or an immediate or future impact on the pregnant woman's own health. Most participants wanted information about the sex of fetus (86%) and common trisomies (71%), with almost half of participants desiring information about rare autosomal aneuploidies and/or all genetic information that may affect the baby. In addition, participants were found to be comfortable screening for conditions that are well-known, influence care during pregnancy, and are treatable. Finally, while most respondents either had insurance coverage for NIPT or were able to afford NIPT out of pocket, the majority of our participants felt that expanded NIPT should be either free for everyone or for those considered high risk. Discussion: Our findings suggest that with appropriate pre-test counseling, pregnant patients may choose NIPT for an expanding list of conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE:: To evaluate the utility of nuchal translucency (NT) screening in the detection of rare chromosomal aneuploidies in the setting of cell-free DNA (cfDNA). METHODS:: A retrospective cohort study of pregnancies screened through the California Prenatal Screening Program between March 2009 and December 2012. Karyotype analysis was the primary method of chromosomal evaluation during the study period and abnormal chromosomal karyotype results were classified by whether the abnormality would be detectable by cfDNA (non-mosaic trisomy 13, 18, 21 or sex-chromosomal aneuploidy (SCA)). For those rare aneuploidies detectable by karyotype but not cfDNA, the number of cases that had an increased NT and the detection rate and positive predictive value (PPV) of increased NT for rare aneuploidies were determined. RESULTS:: A total of 452,901 pregnant women had screening. There were 2,572 chromosomally abnormal fetuses, of which 1,922 (74.7%) had a common aneuploidy detectable by cfDNA, leaving 450,979 without T13, 18, 21. Of these, 4,181 (0.93%) had an NT ≥ 3.0mm. There were 649 rare aneuploidies not detectable by cfDNA. Of these, 108 (16.6%) had an NT ≥3.0mm. The PPV of an NT ≥3.0mm for rare aneuploidies was 2.6%. In all, 4,176 fetuses need to be screened with NT to detect a rare aneuploidy. CONCLUSIONS:: The addition of NT to cfDNA screening would detect 16.6% of rare aneuploidies. Increased NT has a low PPV for rare aneuploidies and a large number of women would need NT screening to detect each affected fetus.

ObjectivesThe performance of noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) for fetal aneuploidy in twin pregnancies is dependent on the amount of placentally derived cell-free DNA, the "fetal fraction (FF)," present in maternal plasma. We report FF values in monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) pregnancies.MethodsWe reviewed FF in pregnancies at 10 to 20 completed weeks gestational age based on single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-based NIPS where zygosity was routinely established in twin pregnancies. The cohort included 121 446 (96.3%) singleton, 1454 (1.2%) MZ, and 3161 (2.5%) DZ pregnancies. For DZ twins, individual FFs were measured.ResultsCombined FF for DZ and MZ fetuses were 35% and 26% greater than singletons, respectively. The individual FF contributions from each fetus in DZ twins were, on average, 32% less than singletons. FF in DZ twin pairs were moderately correlated (Pearson correlation coefficient.66). When a threshold of 2.8% FF was applied to define uninterpretable results, 1.7% (2102/121 446) of singletons, 0.8% (11/1454) of MZ pairs, and 5.6% (178/3161) of DZ pairs were uninterpretable.ConclusionFor optimal aneuploidy NIPS in twin pregnancies, zygosity should be established and in DZ twins FF for both fetuses should be determined to identify those cases where results can be reliably interpreted.

Background: Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is increasingly used in the clinical prenatal screening of twin pregnancies, and its screening performance for chromosomal abnormalities requires further evaluation. For twin pregnancies with indications for prenatal diagnosis, there is a lack of clinical data to assess the prenatal diagnosis rate (PDR). The aim of this study was to evaluate the screening performance of NIPT for foetal chromosomal abnormalities in twin pregnancies and the PDR in the second and third trimesters. Methods: Ultrasound scans were carried out for all twin pregnancies between 11 and 13+ 6 gestational weeks. For twin pregnancies with nuchal translucency thickness˂3.0 mm and no foetal structural malformations, NIPT was performed after blood sampling, followed by routine ultrasound monitoring. Women with twin pregnancies who underwent NIPT at the prenatal diagnostic centre of Xiangya Hospital from January 2018 to May 2022 were included in the study. Genetic counselling was offered to each pregnant woman when the NIPT result indicated a high risk of abnormalities or abnormal ultrasonographic (USG) findings were detected. We followed up twin pregnancies for NIPT results, USG findings, prenatal diagnosis results and pregnancy outcomes. Results: In 1754 twin pregnancies, the sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of NIPT for trisomy 21 were 100%, 99.9% and 75%, and the corresponding values for sex chromosome aneuploidy (SCA) were 100%, 99.9% and 50%, respectively. For the 14 twin pregnancies for which the NIPT results indicated a high risk of abnormalities, the PDR was 78.6% (11/14). For the 492 twin pregnancies for which the NIPT results indicated a low risk of abnormalities, the rate of USG findings in the second and third trimesters was 39.4% (194/492); of these pregnancies, prenatal diagnosis was recommended for 16.7% (82/492), but it was actually performed in only 8.3% (41/492), and the PDR was 50% (41/82). There was no significant difference in the PDR between the NIPT high-risk and low-risk groups. Conclusions: The screening performance of NIPT for SCA in twin pregnancies needs to be further evaluated. When abnormal NIPT results or USG findings are used as the main prenatal diagnostic indicator in the second and third trimesters, the PDR is poor. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) tests for fetal chromosomal anomalies through maternal blood sampling. It is becoming widely available and standard of care for pregnant women in many countries. It is performed in the first trimester of pregnancy, usually between 9 and 12 weeks. Fragments of fetal cell-free deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) floating in maternal plasma are detected and analyzed by this test to assess for chromosomal aberrations. Similarly, maternal tumor-derived cell-free DNA (ctDNA) released from the tumor cells also circulates in the plasma. Hence, the presence of genomic anomalies originating from maternal tumor-derived DNA may be detected on the NIPS-based fetal risk assessment in pregnant patients. Presence of multiple aneuploidies or autosomal monosomies are the most commonly reported NIPS abnormalities detected with occult maternal malignancies. When such results are received, the search for an occult maternal malignancy begins, in which imaging plays a crucial role. The most commonly detected malignancies via NIPS are leukemia, lymphoma, breast and colon cancers. Ultrasound is a reasonable radiation-free modality for imaging during pregnancy, specially when there are localizing symptoms or findings, such as palpable lumps. While there are no consensus guidelines on the imaging evaluation for these patients, when there are no localizing symptoms or clinically palpable findings, whole body MRI is recommended as the radiation-free modality of choice to search for an occult malignancy. Based on clinical symptoms, practice patterns, and available resources, breast ultrasound, chest radiographs, and targeted ultrasound evaluations can also be performed initially or as a follow-up for MRI findings. CT is reserved for exceptional circumstances due to its higher radiation dose. This article intends to increase awareness of this rare but stressful clinical scenario and guide imaging evaluation for occult malignancy detected via NIPS during pregnancy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To evaluate the value of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in the screening of rare autosomal abnormalities and provide further support for the clinical application of NIPT. A total of 81,518 pregnant women who underwent NIPT at the Anhui Maternal and Child Health Hospital between May 2018 and March 2022 were selected. The high-risk samples were analyzed using amniotic fluid karyotype and chromosome microarray analysis (CMA), and the pregnancy outcomes were followed up. NIPT detected 292 cases (0.36%) with rare autosomal abnormalities among the 81,518 cases sampled. Of these, 140 (0.17%) showed rare autosomal trisomies (RATs), and 102 of these patients agreed to undergo invasive testing. Five cases were true positives, with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 4.90%. Copy number variants (CNV) were detected in 152 samples of the total cases (0.19%), and 95 of the patients involved agreed to the use of CMA. Twenty-nine of these cases were confirmed to be true positive, with a PPV of 30.53%. Detailed follow-up information was obtained in 81 cases from 97 patients with false-positive results for RATs. Thirty-seven of these cases (45.68%) had adverse perinatal outcomes, with a higher incidence of small for gestational age (SGA), intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR), and preterm birth (PTB). NIPT is not recommended for screening for RATs. However, considering that positive results are associated with an increased risk of IUGR and PTB, additional fetal ultrasound examination should be performed to monitor fetal growth. In addition, NIPT has a reference value in screening for CNVs, especially pathogenic CNVs, but a comprehensive analysis of prenatal diagnosis combined with ultrasound and family history is still needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Nuchal translucency (NT) is the ultrasound observation of subcutaneous fluid accumulation at the back of the fetal neck, which, when excessively enlarged, can lead to nuchal edema or cystic hygroma. Elevated NT is associated with chromosomal anomalies and pregnancy complications. Cystic hygroma (CH) is caused by lymphatic system blockage, resulting in fluid-filled pseudocysts. Its incidence varies, but it is usually rare in the general population. CH is commonly detected during prenatal screenings, with higher incidences in populations undergoing extensive testing. It can be associated with genetic conditions like Turner and Down syndromes, influenced by geographic regions and maternal age. Ultrasound is an established method for CH diagnosis, revealing multiseptated cystic masses. A normal karyotype is found in only 20-50% of cases. The management varies from expectant monitoring to pregnancy termination, depending on severity and associated anomalies. The risk of recurrence depends on karyotype; normal karyotypes have a higher recurrence risk. Spontaneous resolution of cystic hygroma has been reported in some cases. To illustrate this situation, we present the case of a patient with a spontaneously regressed CH associated with a normal karyotype and a favorable outcome. In conclusion, cystic hygroma management and counseling should consider the presence of chromosomal abnormalities, but recent studies reveal a more optimistic perspective once these abnormalities are ruled out. Collaborative counseling is essential for informed decision-making during pregnancy regarding fetal interventions, neonatal care or palliative care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the correlation combined fetal fraction and Z-score for fetal trisomies 13, 18, and 21 of NIPT by the semiconductor sequencing platform and further analyze the differences of different sequencing depths. Methods: A cohort of 61,581 pregnancies were recruited for NIPT. Invasive prenatal diagnostic confirmation is recommended in all high-risk NIPT cases. Logistic regression and rank correlation analysis were applied to analyze the relationship between different parameters. ROC curve analysis was adopted to analyze the cutoff values of Z-score and fetal fraction. Results: A total of 278 common trisomy pregnancies were verified in 377 NIPT-positive results. The fitted logistic regression models revealed that Z-scores of NIPT-positive results were significantly associated with PPVs (p < 0.05). The ROC curve analysis showed that the optimal cutoff value of Z-scores for T21, T18, and T13 was 7.597, 4.944, and 9.135 for NIPT and 9.489, 8.004, and 12.4 for NIPT-plus. If combing fetal fraction as another evaluation factor, the PPV of trisomy 21 gradually improved. We analyzed the correlation between the fetal fraction and the PPV, which revealed that the fetal fraction was significantly correlated with PPV. By analyzing the PPV of different groups divided by the associated criteria obtained from ROC curve, the PPV of high Z-score and high fetal fraction is higher in groups of Z-score > the optimal cutoff value. Conclusion: The results of this study show that the fetal fraction is significantly correlated with the PPV. Combining fetal fraction with Z-score is significantly better than in groups of Z-score-associated criteria; clinicians can give more accurate and efficient prenatal genetic counseling. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To evaluate the clinical efficiency of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for fetal chromosomal aneuploidy screening in twin pregnancies. A total of 1650 women with twin pregnancies were enrolled in the study, which underwent NIPT at the Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China from January 2013 to June 2022. Fetal karyotyping analysis was conducted in high-risk patients, with subsequent follow-up on pregnancy outcomes. In 1650 pregnancies, NIPT results showed ten cases of the fetal chromosome aneuploidy, of which six cases were true positive and four cases were false positive. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and false-positive rate (FPR) of trisomy 21 were 100%, 99.79%, 57.14%, and 0.18%, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and FPR of trisomy 18 were 100%, 99.94%, 50%, and 0.06%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and FPR of trisomy 13 were 100%, 100%, 100%, and 0%, respectively. No false negatives were detected and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 100% of the total. Eleven pregnancies failed the NIPT test with no-call due to the low fetal fraction (< 4%). NIPT is a high-performing routine primary prenatal screening test in twin pregnancies, with high sensitivity and specificity in screening for fetal aneuploidy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]