1. Influence of Estimated Fetal Weight on Labor Management
- Author
-
Robin Steele, Norris Thompson, Lorie M. Harper, Elisa T. Bushman, Sheri M. Jenkins, Alan T.N. Tita, and Meredith Gray
- Subjects
Adult ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Time Factors ,Birth weight ,Population ,Ultrasonography, Prenatal ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Pregnancy ,Risk Factors ,Medicine ,Humans ,education ,reproductive and urinary physiology ,Retrospective Studies ,education.field_of_study ,030219 obstetrics & reproductive medicine ,Labor, Obstetric ,business.industry ,Obstetrics ,Cesarean Section ,Obstetrics and Gynecology ,Gestational age ,Retrospective cohort study ,Odds ratio ,medicine.disease ,Confidence interval ,Patient Care Management ,Fetal Weight ,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health ,Female ,business ,Body mass index - Abstract
Objective Prior studies suggest knowledge of estimated fetal weight (EFW), particularly by ultrasound (US), increases the risk for cesarean delivery. These same studies suggest that concern for macrosomia potentially alters labor management leading to increased rates of cesarean delivery. We aimed to assess if shortened labor management, as a result of suspected macrosomia (≥4,000 g), leads to an increased rate of cesarean delivery. Study Design This is a secondary analysis of a retrospective cohort study at a single tertiary center in 2015 of women with singleton pregnancies ≥36 weeks with documented EFW by US within 3 weeks or physical exam on admission. Women were excluded if an initial cervical exam was ≥6 cm or no attempt was made to labor. In addition, patients were excluded for the diagnosis of hypertension, diabetes, or prior cesarean delivery, as these comorbidities influence the use of US, labor management, and cesarean delivery independent of fetal weight. Patients were classified as EFW of ≥4,000 and Results Of 1,506 patients included, 54 (3.5%) had EFW of ≥4,000 g. Women with EFW of ≥4,000 g had a larger body mass index, higher fetal birth weight, were more likely to be undergoing induction of labor, had a more advanced gestational age, and were more likely to have had an US within 3 weeks of delivery. They were more likely to undergo cesarean delivery (29.6 vs. 9.3%, adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 2.7, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3–5.5) despite not having shortened labor times. When analyzing this population by method of obtaining EFW, those with EFW based on US rather than external palpation were more likely to undergo cesarean delivery (13.1 vs. 7.9%, AOR: 1.5, 95% CI: 1.01–2.12), again without having shortened labor times. Conclusion EFW of ≥4,000 g and use of US to estimate fetal weight do not appear to shorten labor management despite being associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery.
- Published
- 2019