Search

Background: Updated World Health Organization guidelines have amplified debate about how resource constraints should impact monitoring strategies for HIV‐infected persons on combination antiretroviral therapy (cART). We estimated the incremental benefit and cost effectiveness of alternative monitoring strategies for east Africans with known HIV infection. Methods: Using a validated HIV computer simulation based on resource‐limited data (USAID and AMPATH) and circumstances (east Africa), we compared alternative monitoring strategies for HIV‐infected persons newly started on cART. We evaluated clinical, immunologic and virologic monitoring strategies, including combinations and conditional logic (e.g., only perform virologic testing if immunologic testing is positive). We calculated incremental cost‐effectiveness ratios (ICER) in units of cost per quality‐adjusted life year (QALY), using a societal perspective and a lifetime horizon. Costs were measured in 2008 US dollars, and costs and benefits were discounted at 3%. We compared the ICER of monitoring strategies with those of other resource‐constrained decisions, in particular earlier cART initiation (at CD4 counts of 350 cells/mm[sup.3] rather than 200 cells/mm[sup.3]). Results: Monitoring strategies employing routine CD4 testing without virologic testing never maximized health benefits, regardless of budget or societal willingness to pay for additional health benefits. Monitoring strategies employing virologic testing conditional upon particular CD4 results delivered the most benefit at willingness‐to‐pay levels similar to the cost of earlier cART initiation (approximately $2600/QALY). Monitoring strategies employing routine virologic testing alone only maximized health benefits at willingness‐to‐pay levels (> $4400/QALY) that greatly exceeded the ICER of earlier cART initiation. Conclusions: CD4 testing alone never maximized health benefits regardless of resource limitations. Programmes routinely performing virologic testing but deferring cART initiation may increase health benefits by reallocating monitoring resources towards earlier cART initiation., Background Considerable debate exists about how resource constraints should impact laboratory monitoring for HIV‐infected patients on combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) [1‐6]. This lack of consensus is reflected in the equivocal [...]

Background There are too many plausible permutations and scale-up scenarios of combination hepatitis C virus (HCV) interventions for exhaustive testing in experimental trials. Therefore, we used a computer simulation to project the health and economic impacts of alternative combination intervention scenarios for people who inject drugs (PWID), focusing on direct antiviral agents (DAA) and medication-assisted treatment combined with syringe access programs (MAT+). Methods We performed an allocative efficiency study, using a mathematical model to simulate the progression of HCV in PWID and its related consequences. We combined 2 previously validated simulations to estimate the cost-effectiveness of intervention strategies that included a range of coverage levels. Analyses were performed from a health-sector and societal perspective, with a 15-year time horizon and a discount rate of 3%. Results From a health-sector perspective (excluding criminal justice system–related costs), 4 potential strategies fell on the cost-efficiency frontier. At 20% coverage, DAAs had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $27 251/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). Combinations of DAA at 20% with MAT+ at 20%, 40%, and 80% coverage had ICERs of $165 985/QALY, $325 860/QALY, and $399 189/QALY, respectively. When analyzed from a societal perspective (including criminal justice system–related costs), DAA at 20% with MAT+ at 80% was the most effective intervention and was cost saving. While DAA at 20% with MAT+ at 80% was more expensive (eg, less cost saving) than MAT+ at 80% alone without DAA, it offered a favorable value compared to MAT+ at 80% alone ($23 932/QALY). Conclusions When considering health-sector costs alone, DAA alone was the most cost-effective intervention. However, with criminal justice system–related costs, DAA and MAT+ implemented together became the most cost-effective intervention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction Health plans, employers, and policymakers are looking for more effective approaches to control health expenditures. Reductions in health expenditures can arise from lowering either the costs or the quantities [...], Background: Evidence suggests that cost sharing (i.e., copayments and deductibles) decreases health expenditures but also reduces essential care. Value-based insurance design (VBID) has been proposed to encourage essential care while controlling health expenditures. Our objective was to estimate the impact of broader diffusion of VBID on US health care benefits and costs. Methods and Findings: We used a published computer simulation of costs and life expectancy gains from US health care to estimate the impact of broader diffusion of VBID. Two scenarios were analyzed: (1) applying VBID solely to pharmacy benefits and (2) applying VBID to both pharmacy benefits and other health care services (e.g., devices). We assumed that cost sharing would be eliminated for high-value services ( Conclusion: Broader diffusion of VBID may amplify benefits from US health care without increasing health expenditures. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.

Background In the current report, we ask if targeting a cognitive behavioral therapy ( CBT)-based intervention aimed at reducing hazardous alcohol consumption to HIV-infected persons in East Africa would have a favorable value at costs that are feasible for scale-up. Methods Using a computer simulation to inform HIV prevention decisions in East Africa, we compared 4 different strategies for targeting a CBT intervention-(i) all HIV-infected persons attending clinic; (ii) only those patients in the pre-antiretroviral therapy ( ART) stages of care; (iii) only those patients receiving ART; and (iv) only those patients with detectable viral loads (VLs) regardless of disease stage. We define targeting as screening for hazardous alcohol consumption (e.g., using the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test and offering the CBT intervention to those who screen positive). We compared these targeting strategies to a null strategy (no intervention) or a hypothetical scenario where an alcohol intervention was delivered to all adults regardless of HIV status. Results An intervention targeted to HIV-infected patients could prevent 18,000 new infections, add 46,000 quality-adjusted life years ( QALYs), and yield an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $600/ QALY compared to the null scenario. Narrowing the prioritized population to only HIV-infected patients in pre- ART phases of care results in 15,000 infections averted, the addition of 21,000 QALYs and would be cost-saving, while prioritizing based on an unsuppressed HIV-1 VL test results in 8,300 new infections averted, adds 6,000 additional QALYs, and would be cost-saving as well. Conclusions Our results suggest that targeting a cognitive-based treatment aimed at reducing hazardous alcohol consumption to subgroups of HIV-infected patients provides favorable value in comparison with other beneficial strategies for HIV prevention and control in this region. It may even be cost-saving under certain circumstances. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]