Search

The PhD by Publication offers doctoral students an opportunity to focus on publishing during their candidature. A considerable body of literature has explored questions of legitimacy, consistency and quality of this model of scholarship, while students have reflected on how this approach helped build a publishing track record and develop skills associated with writing scholarly articles [Jackson, D. (2013). Completing a PhD by publication: A review of Australian policy and implications for practice. "Higher Education Research & Development," 32(3), 355-368; Robins, L., & Kanowski, P. (2008). PhD by publication: A student's perspective. "Journal of Research Practice," 4(2), 1-20]. However, there is a need to explore how this approach both shapes and reflects the student experience of doctoral studies. This auto-ethnographical article analyses my own experience of the PhD by Publication. On the one hand, this method suited my multidisciplinary research topic and approach to research and assisted the flexibility and creativity of my research. On the other, I began to view my value as a researcher and the value of my research, in terms of the quantitative performance metrics of research in output, citation counts and h-index. Concept of performativity, I analyse how the PhD by Publication potentially reshapes what it is to be a doctoral student, and how the value of doctoral students is construed by themselves and others within their university.

We write as Australian youth work educators. We consider some of the ethical challenges involved in teaching youth work 'in a warm climate', situated in the diaspora of English youth work but where youth work also has a uniquely Australian character, placing us in an ethically liminal space in our teaching between an understanding of youth work that is robustly defended as being both 'good' and 'true', and what we do, which is different from this, and has its own character and strengths. We situate this in the policy history of youth work in Australia, particularly in the 'neoliberal turn' that this has taken in the last four decades which has created ethical challenges for us, just as it has for those elsewhere. Two guiding questions shape this paper. The first is, given our differences, what challenges do we face in maintaining connections with 'good' youth work and its value base as traditionally defined and defended in England, and relatedly, given that policy and funding regimes in the UK seem to be aligning more with an Australian model, is there anything that the youth work community in the UK can learn from the Australian experience? [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article critically analyses the policy discourse that accompanied the introduction of the 'New Employment Services Model' (NESM) into the Australian social security system. Critical policy discourse analysis of documents presenting reforms to employment services provision shows that the NESM embeds a logic of activation that construes job seekers both as passive units requiring external motivation (through 'employment support' and 'mutual obligation'), and as active agents responsible for their own situation. This contradictory logic results in inconsistencies between the espoused aims of the reforms and the experience of those subject to the policy mechanisms. Analysis of departmental outcomes data illustrates the inconsistent operational consequences of the conflation of 'targeted compliance' and 'support.' Due to the technological automation of activation processes, the real discursive innovation of the NESM is one of 'digital depoliticization,' whereby the moralizing assumptions that inform punitive activation are embedded and therefore concealed in the policy technology. The operational effect is to subordinate the achievement of employment to compliance with mutual obligation requirements as a structured aim of employment services provision. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]