Search

Purpose: The Adaptively Dosed ImmunoTherapy Trial (ADAPT-IT;NCT03122522) investigated adaptive ipilimumab discontinuation in melanoma based on early radiographic assessment. Initial findings indicated similar effectiveness compared with conventional nivolumab-ipilimumab (nivo-ipi). Exploratory biomarker analyses and final clinical results are now reported., Patients and Methods: Patients with unresectable melanoma received two doses of nivo-ipi. Radiographic assessment at Week 6 informed continuation of ipilimumab before nivolumab maintenance. The primary endpoint was overall response rate at Week 12. Plasma was assayed for circulating tumor DNA and 10 cytokines using a multiplex immunoassay. Flow cytometry of peripheral blood mononuclear cells was performed with an 11-color panel., Results: Among the treated patients, expansion of proliferating T-cell populations was observed in responders and nonresponders. Baseline IL6 levels were low in patients achieving an objective radiographic response (median 1.30 vs. 2.86 pg/mL; P = 0.025). High baseline IL6 levels were associated with short progression-free survival [PFS; HR = 1.24, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.01-1.52; P = 0.041]. At Week 6, patients with response had lower average tumor variant allele fractions than nonresponders (median 0.000 vs. 0.019; P = 0.014). Greater increases in average variant allele fractions from baseline to Week 6 correlated with short PFS (HR = 1.11, 95% CI, 1.01-1.21; P = 0.023). Week 12 overall response rate was 47% (95% CI, 35%-59%) with a median follow-up of 34 months among survivors. Median PFS was 21 months (95% CI, 10-not reached); 76% of responses (95% CI, 64%-91%) persisted at 36 months., Conclusions: Adaptively dosed nivo-ipi responses are durable and resemble historical data for conventional nivo-ipi. Baseline IL6 and circulating tumor DNA changes during treatment warrant further study as biomarkers of nivo-ipi response., (©2024 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Purpose: Nivolumab + ipilimumab (nivo + ipi) is highly efficacious but has high toxicity. Standard treatment in advanced melanoma is four doses of nivo + ipi followed by nivo alone. Whether four doses of nivo + ipi are needed is unclear., Methods: The Adaptively Dosed ImmunoTherapy Trial (ADAPT-IT) study (NCT03122522) is a multicenter, single-arm phase II clinical trial. Patients received two doses of nivo (1 mg/kg) + ipi (3 mg/kg) followed by a computed tomography scan at week 6. Patients without new lesions or index lesion tumor growth of > 4% had protocol-defined early favorable antitumor effect (FATE) and ceased nivo + ipi, transitioning to nivo monotherapy. Patients without FATE at week 6 received the standard third and fourth doses of nivo + ipi followed by nivo monotherapy. The primary end point was response rate by RECIST 1.1 at week 12. Secondary end points included additional efficacy assessments and safety., Results: Sixty patients were enrolled; 41 patients (68%) had FATE at week 6 and met criteria for stopping nivo + ipi. Best overall response rates by RECIST at week 12 or any time afterward were 48% (95% CI, 35 to 62) and 58% (95% CI, 45 to 71), respectively. With a median follow-up of 25 months, the estimated 18-month progression-free survival and overall survival are 52% and 80%, respectively. Fifty seven percent of patients had grade 3-5 treatment-related toxicity., Conclusion: The efficacy and toxicity of standard four dose nivo + ipi induction therapy in melanoma is likely driven by the first two doses. An interim computed tomography scan after two doses guided cessation of combination dosing and identified almost all responders. Longer follow-up and further study are needed to fully understand the implications of a shortened induction course of nivo + ipi., Competing Interests: Michael A. PostowConsulting or Advisory Role: Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Array BioPharma, NewLink Genetics, Incyte, Merck, Eisai, PfizerResearch Funding: Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Array BioPharma (Inst), Infinity Pharmaceuticals (Inst), Regenix (Inst), Merck (Inst), AstraZeneca/MedImmune (Inst) Debra A. GoldmanEmployment: RegeneronStock and Other Ownership Interests: Johnson & Johnson Alexander N. ShoushtariConsulting or Advisory Role: Immunocore, Bristol Myers SquibbResearching Funding: Immunocore, Bristol Myers Squibb, Xcovery, Polaris, Novartis (Inst), Pfizer (Inst)Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: UpToDate Allison Betof WarnerHonoraria: LG ChemConsulting or Advisory Role: Nanbiotix, Iovance Biotherapeutics, Novartis, Shanghai Jo’Ann Medical Technology, BluePath Solutions, PfizerResearch Funding: Leap Therapeutics Margaret K. CallahanEmployment: Bristol-Myers Squibb (I), Celgene (I), Kleo Pharmaceuticals (I), Bristol-Myers Squibb (I)Consulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Moderna Therapeutics, Merck, ImmunocoreResearching Funding: Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst)Other Relationship: Clinical Care Options, Potomac Center for Medical Education Omar EtonSpeakers’ Bureau: MerckResearching Funding: Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst) Suresh G. NairStock and Other Ownership Interests: Moderna Therapeutics, Novavax, Biotech, Gilead SciencsResearch Funding: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, Nektar (Inst) Katherine S. PanageasStock and Other Ownership Interests: AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Sunesis Pharmaceuticals Jedd D. WolchokStock and Other Ownership Interests: Tizona Therapeutics, Inc, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Imvaq Therapeutics, Beigene, Linnaeus Therapeutics, Arsenal IO, Geogiamune, LLC, Maverick Therapeutics, Apricity Therapeutics, Trieza TherapeuticsConsulting or Advisory Role: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, Sellas Life Sciences, Lilly, Tizona Therapeutics, Inc,, Amgen, Chugai Pharma, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Ascentage Pharma, PsiOxus Therapeutics, F-Start Biotechnology, Surface Biotechnology, Apricity Therapeutics, PsiOxus Therapeutics, F-Star Biotechnology, Surface Oncology, Apricity Therapeutics, PsiOxus Therapeutics, Astellas Pharma, Recepta Biopharma, Arsenal IO, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo,Inc, Dragonfly Therapeutics, Geogiamune, Kyowa Kirin Pharmaceutical, Maverick Therapeutics, Werewolf Therapeutics, Trishula Therapeutics, Idera, Imvq Therapeutics, Biscara TherapeuticsResearch Funding: Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), Genentech/Roche (Inst), Merck Sharp & Dohme (Inst)Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: I am a co-inventor on an issued patent for DNA vaccines for treatment for cancer in companion animals, I am a co-inventor on a patent for use of oncolytic Newcaste Disease virus, I am a co-inventor and receive royalties for a blood test for monitoring myeloid derived suppressor cells. I am co-inventor and receive royalties for a petent for immune modulating antibododies. I am a co-inventor on a patent for CAR+ T cells targeting differentiation antigens as means to treat cancer. I am a co-inventor on a patent for Anti-CD40 agonist mAb fused to Monophosphory Lipid A (MPL) for cancer therapy, Alphavirus Replicon Particles Expressing TRP2, Engineered Vaccinia Viruses for Cancer Immunotherapy, Recombinant Poxviruses for Cancer Immunotherapy Paul B. ChapmanConsulting or Advisory Role: Merck, Pfizer, Black Diamond TherapeuticsResearch Funding: Pfizer, NCI (Inst), GenentechNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies and anti-programmed cell death 1 protein (PD-1) antibodies have been used separately to treat metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC). While two anti-EGFR antibodies have similar clinical activity, cetuximab is administered weekly, whereas panitumumab is administered every two weeks. This report details findings using panitumumab in combination with anti-PD-1 antibody in patients with relapsed refractory cSCC. Three consecutive patients with poor performance status and rapidly progressive recurrent cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) of the face or scalp signed informed consent to receive an anti-PD-1 antibody with the option to add panitumumab were there inadequate response. After 2, 5, and 7 cycles of anti-PD-1 antibody treatment, respectively, panitumumab was added and the combination was continued for 27, 7, and 5 cycles, respectively. Fatigue, rash, and hypomagnesemia were reported, consistent with expectations for either agent alone. All three patients achieved durable complete response. The favorable clinical outcomes support further evaluation of the combination of anti-PD1 and anti-EGFR antibodies to control refractory cSCC of the face or scalp. J Drugs Dermatol. 2021;20(8):901-904. doi:10.36849/JDD.6175.

Advances in the immunotherapy of cancer have prolonged survival for cancer patients, but the clinical and financial impact of treatments must be considered in determining the overall clinical utility and economic value of therapeutic agents. Quality-adjusted life years and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios are clinical and economic metrics that can be used to evaluate the value of immune checkpoint inhibitors. This Commentary provides perspective on the limitations, benefits, and potential enhancement of this approach to support value-based medicine.

Background: A multi-institutional, randomized phase II trial of continuous dosing of dabrafenib with or without trametinib is ongoing in metastatic thyroid cancer. Preclinical evidence and emerging clinical experience in other cancers support evaluating intermittent dosing of these two agents to achieve more durable response, while being better tolerated and more cost effective., Patients: Two consecutive patients with symptomatic, metastatic radioactive iodine-resistant BRAF V600E mutated papillary thyroid cancer and poor performance status were treated initially with dabrafenib 150 mg twice daily plus trametinib 2 mg once daily, first in continuous daily dosing, then in a five-week-on and three-week-off schedule., Results: Both patients showed rapid clinical improvement upon starting the regimen. They also noted improved tolerance of treatment upon transitioning to the intermittent dosing schedule. They continue to show evidence of antitumor activity 27 and 18 months respectively from the start of treatment and 15 and 13 months respectively from the start of the first break using intermittent dosing., Conclusions: Achieving durable palliation in these consecutive patients supports evaluating the intermittent dosing schedule of dabrafenib and trametinib in BRAF V600E mutated papillary thyroid cancer. Results of the ongoing phase 3 trial of continuous daily dosing and a subsequent trial of intermittent dosing, as is being tested in other cancers, will be needed to confirm that an intermittent dosing strategy in thyroid cancer can forestall resistant disease, improve tolerability, and decrease the cost of care.

The high rate of brain metastasis in patients with advanced melanoma has been a clinical challenge for oncologists. Despite considerable progress made in the management of advanced melanoma over the past two decades, improvement in overall survival has been elusive. This is due to the high incidence of CNS metastases, which progress relentlessly and which are only anecdotally responsive to systemic therapies. Surgery, stereotactic radiosurgery and whole-brain radiotherapy with or without cytotoxic chemotherapy remain the mainstay of treatment. However, new drugs have been developed based on our improved understanding of the molecular signaling mechanisms responsible for host immune tolerance and for melanoma growth. In 2011, the US FDA approved two agents, one antagonizing each of these processes, for the treatment of advanced melanoma. The first is ipilimumab, an anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody that enhances cellular immunity and reduces tolerance to tumor-associated antigens. The second is vemurafenib, an inhibitor that blocks the abnormal signaling for melanoma cellular growth in tumors that carry the BRAF(V600E) mutation. Both drugs have anecdotal clinical activity for brain metastasis and are being evaluated in clinical trial settings. Additional clinical trials of newer agents involving these pathways are also showing promise. Therefore, targeted therapies must be incorporated into the multimodality management of melanoma brain metastasis.

Purpose: Aurora A kinase is critical in assembly and function of the mitotic spindle. It is overexpressed in various tumor types and implicated in oncogenesis and tumor progression. This trial evaluated the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of MLN8054, a selective small-molecule inhibitor of Aurora A kinase., Methods: In this first-in-human, dose-escalation study, MLN8054 was given orally for 7, 14, or 21 days followed by a 14-day treatment-free period. Escalating cohorts of 3-6 patients with advanced solid tumors were treated until DLT was seen in ≥2 patients in a cohort. Serial blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetics and skin biopsies were collected for pharmacodynamics., Results: Sixty-one patients received 5, 10, 20, 30, or 40 mg once daily for 7 days; 25, 35, 45, or 55 mg/day in four divided doses (QID) for 7 days; or 55, 60, 70, or 80 mg/day plus methylphenidate or modafinil with daytime doses (QID/M) for 7-21 days. DLTs of reversible grade 3 benzodiazepine-like effects defined the estimated MTD of 60 mg QID/M for 14 days. MLN8054 was absorbed rapidly, exposure was dose proportional, and terminal half-life was 30-40 h. Three patients had stable disease for >6 cycles., Conclusions: MLN8054 dosing for up to 14 days of a 28-day cycle was feasible. Reversible somnolence was dose limiting and prevented achievement of plasma concentrations predicted necessary for target modulation. A recommended dose for investigation in phase 2 trials was not established. A second-generation Aurora A kinase inhibitor is in development.

This phase I trial examined the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of MLN8054, an oral, selective, small-molecule inhibitor of Aurora A kinase. Patients with advanced solid tumors received increasing doses of MLN8054 in 28-day cycles until dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was seen in ≥2 of 3-6 patients in a cohort. For the 10-mg and 20-mg cohorts, treatment was administered once daily on days 1 to 5 and 8 to 12. Patients in later cohorts (25, 35, 45, 55, 60, 70, and 80 mg/day) were treated four times daily on days 1 to 14, with the largest dose at bedtime (QID-14D) to mitigate benzodiazepine-like effects possibly associated with peak plasma concentrations. Patients (n = 43) received a median of 1 cycle (range, 1-10). DLT of somnolence was first noted in the 20-mg cohort. Two DLTs of somnolence (n = 1) and transaminitis (n = 1) were seen at QID-14D 80 mg. Grade 2 oral mucositis (n = 1), predicted to be a mechanistic effect, was observed only at QID-14D 80 mg. MLN8054 exposure levels were roughly linear with dose; terminal half-life was 30 to 40 hours. Pharmacodynamic analyses of skin and tumor mitotic indices, mitotic cell chromosome alignment, and spindle bipolarity provided evidence of Aurora A inhibition. MLN8054 dosing for 10 to 14 days in 28-day cycles was feasible. Somnolence and transaminitis were DLTs. Pharmacodynamic analyses in mitotic cells of both skin and tumor provided proof of mechanism for Aurora A kinase inhibition. A more potent, selective, second-generation Aurora A kinase inhibitor, MLN8237, is in clinical development.

Background: Glycoprotein-96, a non-polymorphic heat-shock protein, associates with intracellular peptides. Autologous tumor-derived heat shock protein-peptide complex 96 (HSPPC-96) can elicit potent tumor-specific T cell responses and protective immunity in animal models. We sought to investigate the feasibility, safety, and antitumor activity of HSPPC-96 vaccines prepared from tumor specimens of patients with metastatic melanoma., Methods: Patients with a Karnofsky Performance Status >70% and stage III or stage IV melanoma had to have a metastasis >3 cm in diameter resectable as part of routine clinical management. HSPPC-96 tumor-derived vaccines were prepared in one of three dose levels (2.5, 25, or 100 microg/dose) and administered as an intradermal injection weekly for 4 consecutive weeks. In vivo induction of immunity was evaluated using delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) to HSPPC-96, irradiated tumor, and dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB). The gamma-interferon (IFNgamma) ELISPOT assay was used to measure induction of a peripheral blood mononuclear cell response against autologous tumor cells at baseline and at the beginning of weeks 3, 4, and 8., Results: Among 36 patients enrolled, 72% had stage IV melanoma and 83% had received prior systemic therapy. The smallest tumor specimen from which HSPPC-96 was prepared weighed 2 g. Twelve patients (including 9 with stage IV and indicator lesions) had a negative DNCB skin test result at baseline. All 36 patients were treated and evaluable for toxicity and response. There were no serious toxicities. There were no observed DTH responses to HSPPC-96 or to autologous tumor cells before or during treatment. The IFNgamma-producing cell count rose modestly in 5 of 26 patients and returned to baseline by week 8, with no discernible association with HSPPC-96 dosing or clinical parameters. There were no objective responses among 16 patients with stage IV disease and indicator lesions. Among 20 patients treated in the adjuvant setting, 11 with stage IV melanoma at baseline had a progression-free and overall survival of 45% and 82%, respectively, with a median follow-up of 10 years., Conclusion: Treatment with autologous tumor-derived HSPPC-96 was feasible and safe at all doses tested. Observed immunological effects and antitumor activity were modest, precluding selection of a biologically active dose. Nevertheless, the 25-microg dose level was shown to be practical for further study.

Introduction: This phase 2 study was conducted to determine the efficacy and safety of erlotinib alone and with bortezomib in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Methods: Patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed relapsed or refractory stage IIIb/IV NSCLC were randomized (1:1; stratified by baseline histology, smoking history, sex) to receive erlotinib 150 mg/d alone (arm A; n = 25) or in combination with bortezomib 1.6 mg/m2, days 1 and 8 (arm B; n = 25) in 21-day cycles. Responses were assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Tumor samples were evaluated for mutations predicting response. Six additional patients received the combination in a prior dose deescalation stage and were included in safety analyses., Results: Response rates were 16% in arm A and 9% in arm B; disease control rates were 52 and 45%, respectively. The study was halted at the planned interim analysis due to insufficient clinical activity in arm B. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 2.7 and 7.3 months in arm A, and 1.3 and 8.5 months in arm B. Six-month survival rates were 56.0% in both arms; 12-month rates were 40 and 30% in arms A and B, respectively. Response rate to erlotinib+/-bortezomib was significantly higher in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor mutations (50 versus 9% for wild type). The most common treatment-related grade > or =3 adverse event was skin rash (three patients in each treatment group)., Conclusion: Insufficient activity was seen with erlotinib plus bortezomib in patients with relapsed/refractory advanced NSCLC to warrant a phase 3 study of the combination.

The objective of this study was to compare the clinical benefit of biochemotherapy and interferon-alpha-2b (IFN) as adjuvant therapy. Biochemotherapy has higher response rates than other regimens in patients with metastatic melanoma. We conducted a randomized phase III study comparing the clinical benefit of biochemotherapy and IFN as adjuvant therapy. Patients who had undergone lymphadenectomy for melanoma metastatic to regional lymph nodes were randomly assigned to either biochemotherapy or IFN, and IFN patients were further randomized to either high-dose IFN (HDI) or intermediate-dose IFN (IDI). The primary end point was relapse-free survival (RFS); the secondary end point was overall survival (OS). The planned enrollment was 200 patients, the number required to have 80% power to detect, at a significance level of 5%, an improvement in median RFS from 18 to 36 months and an improvement in median OS from 40 to 80 months between the IFN and biochemotherapy groups. A futility analysis was performed because of slow accrual. One hundred and thirty-eight patients were enrolled - 71 in the biochemotherapy group, 34 in the HDI subgroup, and 33 in the IDI subgroup. No significant differences in median RFS or OS between the HDI and IDI subgroups were observed. With a median follow-up of 49.3 months, neither the biochemotherapy nor IFN group had reached median RFS or OS, and there were no significant differences in estimated median RFS or OS (P=0.86 and 0.45, respectively) between the two groups. Biochemotherapy is not more effective than IFN as adjuvant therapy for melanoma. These findings support early termination of this trial.

Metastatic melanoma cells express a number of protein tyrosine kinases (PTKs) that are considered to be targets for imatinib. We conducted a phase II trial of imatinib in patients with metastatic melanoma expressing at least one of these PTKs. Twenty-one patients whose tumours expressed at least one PTK (c-kit, platelet-derived growth factor receptors, c-abl, or abl-related gene) were treated with 400 mg of imatinib twice daily. One patient with metastatic acral lentiginous melanoma, containing the highest c-kit expression among all patients, had dramatic improvement on positron emission tomographic scan at 6 weeks and had a partial response lasting 12.8 months. The responder had a substantial increase in tumour and endothelial cell apoptosis at 2 weeks of treatment. Imatinib was fairly well tolerated: no patient required treatment discontinuation because of toxicity. Fatigue and oedema were the only grade 3 or 4 toxicities that occurred in more than 10% of the patients. Imatinib at the studied dose had minimal clinical efficacy as a single-agent therapy for metastatic melanoma. However, based on the characteristics of the responding tumour in our study, clinical activity of imatinib, specifically in patients with melanoma with certain c-kit aberrations, should be examined.

Response to treatment with imatinib mesylate has been associated in preclinical models with the inhibition of two signaling pathways that promote cellular survival - the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/AKT pathway and the mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) pathway. We sought to evaluate the extent of inhibition of these two pathways in metastatic melanoma specimens from patients treated with imatinib. Metastatic melanoma tumor samples were obtained before and during the second week of imatinib treatment from patients enrolled in a phase II study. A tissue microarray was constructed using formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues, and immunohistochemical analysis was performed using standard techniques to detect phosphorylated (p) ERK1/2 and pAKT expression. Of 21 patients who were treated with imatinib, tumor samples adequate for analysis were available both at baseline and during the second week of treatment from 10 patients for pERK1/2 expression and from nine patients for pAKT expression. No consistent pattern of change in pAKT or pERK expression after treatment with imatinib was observed. No apparent correlation between the clinical benefit of imatinib treatment and changes in pAKT and pERK1/2 expression was observed. A better understanding of the AKT and mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways is needed to optimize the clinical benefit of targeted therapy, such as imatinib.

Background: Systemic treatment of metastatic melanoma is largely ineffective and alternative approaches are needed. Imatinib mesylate is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor that targets bcr-Abl, c-kit, platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR)-alpha, and PDGFR-beta, leading to remarkable clinical responses in several cancers. Signal transduction via c-kit, PDGFR-alpha, and PDGFR-beta has been demonstrated in malignant melanoma., Methods: The primary objective of this Phase II study was to determine the response rate, response duration, and the frequency of 6-month progression-free survival in patients who could receive up to 2 prior therapeutic regimens. Initially, patients received imatinib at at dose of 400 mg twice orally each day. Based on Simon's optimal design, the study allowed entry of 21 patients; if there were > or = 2 objective responses, accrual would then continue to a total of 41 patients., Results: Twenty-six patients were enrolled. Patients experienced 29 episodes of Grade 3 and 2 episodes of Grade 4 toxicity (according to National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria). No objective clinical responses were noted among the 25 evaluable patients. The median time to progression was 54 days and the median overall survival was 200 days. No patient was free of disease progression at 6 months. Paraffin-embedded tumor specimens from 15 patients were tested for expression of imatinib responsive kinases by immunohistochemistry. Three tumors had moderate and 5 tumors had weak staining for c-kit. Five tumor samples had weak staining for PDGFR-alpha and -beta., Conclusions: Imatinib is an inactive single agent in metastatic melanoma in a population of predominantely pretreated patients. The levels of c-kit and/or PDGFR-alpha, -beta expression in the current study were lower than previously reported. Alternative treatment strategies remain a priority for patients with advanced melanoma.

Background: Protein tyrosine kinase (PTK) inhibition has been identified as a promising strategy in the development of new selective therapies, targeting the signaling pathways in melanoma progression. Gleevec, a novel class of anti-tumor drugs, may have a potential therapeutic benefit in melanoma, which involves abnormal activation of abl, c-kit, and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) tyrosine kinases., Methods: Tumor biopsies from 13 patients with metastatic melanoma were screened by immunohistochemistry for PTK [c-kit, C-abl, Abl-related gene (ARG), PDGF receptor-alpha (PDGFR-alpha) and PDGFR-beta] expression before and after being treated with Gleevec @ 400 mg bid for 2 weeks. Both, percentage of positive cells and staining intensity were evaluated., Results: We found a statistically significant (p < 0.01) selective loss of PTK expression in the follow-up biopsy, both in intensity and number of positive cells. PDGFR-alpha and -beta had the highest level of expression reduction. One patient had a durable clinical response, and the follow-up biopsy showed negative expression for four of the PTKs, namely c-abl, ARG, PDGFR-alpha, and beta., Conclusions: Our study reports for the first time the in vivo effect of Gleevec in the induction of apparently selective reduction of PTKs expression under anti-tyrosine kinases treatment, suggesting its potential role in melanoma treatment.

Background: Durable complete response rates ranging from 5% to 20% have been reported in association with biochemotherapy for patients with metastatic melanoma, with response rates on the low end of this range being observed in trials that used lower doses and less intense treatment schedules. In the current study, the authors addressed the feasibility of increasing the doses of agents used in concurrent biochemotherapy., Methods: Three patients with metastatic melanoma were enrolled at each of six concurrent biochemotherapy dose levels. The doses were as follows: dacarbazine 800 mg/m(2) or 1000 mg/m(2) (Day 1); cisplatin 25 mg/m(2) or 30 mg/m(2) (Days 1-4); vinblastine 1.6 mg/m(2) or 1.8 mg/m(2) (Days 1-5); interleukin-2 9 million units (MU) per m(2) or 12 MU/m(2) as a 24-hour continuous infusion (Days 1-4); and interferon-alpha-2b 5 MU/m(2), 10 MU/m(2), or 15 MU/m(2) (Days 1-5) and 5 MU/m(2) (Days 7, 9, and 11) administered subcutaneously., Results: Of the 19 patients who were enrolled, 18 were evaluable for toxicity and response. Sixty-nine treatment courses were administered in total (median, 4 courses per patient; range, 1-6 courses per patient), with reduction of the dose of at least 1 agent being required in 7 courses (10%). Twenty-six courses were delayed by a median of 7 days (range, 3-29 days), with interferon-alpha-2b administration frequently omitted because of thrombocytopenia, most often after Day 5. Blood product support was required in 40 courses. Dose-limiting toxic effects included global encephalopathy, renal and hepatic dysfunction, pancreatitis, and ileus. There was 1 complete response, and there were 10 partial responses. The median time to disease progression was 6.9 months, and the median survival duration was 12.2 months., Conclusions: Although dose intensification can be achieved safely in patients with advanced melanoma, other strategies should be pursued to enhance the clinical activity of biochemotherapy as a response induction regimen.

Background: Patients with metastatic anorectal melanoma generally have an unfavorable prognosis, but no effective systemic therapy has been reported., Methods: The authors retrospectively evaluated the medical records of all patients with metastatic anorectal melanoma treated with biochemotherapy between January 1991 and December 2001 at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX)., Results: The search yielded 18 patients. Of these patients, 14 had undergone treatment with cisplatin (CDDP), vinblastine (VB), dacarbazine (DTIC), interferon alpha-2b (IFN), and interleukin 2 (IL-2); 2 had undergone treatment with CDDP, VB, DTIC, and IFN; 1 had undergone treatment with CDDP, IFN, and IL-2; and 1 had undergone treatment with CDDP, VB, temozolomide, IFN, and IL-2. All IL-2 treatments were administered intravenously. The median follow-up time was 12.2 months (range, 3.5-43.7 months). Eight patients (44%) had major responses, including two (11%) complete responses (CRs). Three patients were lost to follow-up evaluation after the completion of treatment. The median time to progression among the 15 remaining patients was 6.2 months. Four patients, including 1 with a CR, were alive at their last documented follow-up visits (survival: 14.0, 20.7, 31.3, and 43.7 months, respectively). The median overall survival was 12.2 months. Among 13 patients who received biochemotherapy as first-line systemic therapy, 6 patients (46%) had major responses, including two (15%) CRs. The median time to progression for this group was 6.2 months, and the median overall survival was 12.9 months., Conclusions: Biochemotherapy had substantial activity against metastatic anorectal melanoma and should be considered for use in the treatment of metastatic disease from primary anorectal melanoma., (Copyright 2004 American Cancer Society.)

In four clinical trials in mostly chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic melanoma, paclitaxel was found to be effective with a response rate of 16%. In vitro studies have shown that following exposure of cancer cells to paclitaxel for 1 h, sensitivity to repeat paclitaxel doses decreased markedly at 48-72 h and returned at 120 h. In this phase II study we assessed the efficacy of paclitaxel at a dose of 90 mg/m per day given intravenously over 80 min on days 1, 5 and 9 every 3 weeks, initially in two groups of 14 patients with metastatic choroidal and non-choroidal melanoma. One patient in the non-choroidal melanoma group had a confirmed response, and 23 additional patients were therefore accrued to this group. (One patient withdrew consent for treatment within a week from start of therapy. The patient was considered to have received inadequate treatment and a replacement was registered.) A total of 52 patients with a median age of 55 years (range 21-79 years) were treated. Forty-four patients completed two or more courses of paclitaxel and were evaluable for response. We observed >50% tumour regression in six patients. All the responses except one were amongst the 32 evaluable patients with non-choroidal melanoma. The response rate in this group was 15.6%. During the 219 courses of paclitaxel delivered, the side effects were mild, manageable and mostly reversible. No grade 3 acute allergic reactions were observed. Paclitaxel given by short intravenous infusion is marginally active against previously treated non-choroidal melanoma.

Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) and its cognate receptor are widely expressed on melanomas. Coexpression of the growth factor and receptor suggests their role in autocrine or paracrine growth mechanisms. Imatinib mesylate was previously reported to have specific activity in inhibiting select tyrosine kinase receptors, including PDGF and c-Kit. Melanoma cells express abundant levels of the PDGF receptor (PDGFR). Nevertheless, c-Kit expression is progressively lost as the cells take on a more highly metastatic phenotype. To investigate the potential of imatinib mesylate as a therapy for melanoma, we studied its effect on the growth of melanoma cells using an in vivo mouse model. Melanoma cells with high malignant potential (PDGFR-positive, c-Kit-negative) or low malignant potential (PDGFR-positive, c-Kit-positive) were injected subcutaneously into athymic nude mice. Mice were treated with imatinib mesylate (100 mg/kg three times weekly) or with phosphate-buffered saline for 4 to 6 wk. PDGFR-alpha and -beta were expressed on all melanoma cell lines tested. The level of PDGFR expression correlated with the metastatic potential of the melanoma cells: higher levels of PDGFR-alpha were expressed on cells with higher metastatic potential, and higher levels of PDGFR-beta were expressed on cells with lower metastatic potential. There was no significant difference in tumor size between treated and control mice. Immunohistochemical studies demonstrated inhibition of PDGFR phosphorylation on the tumors from mice treated with imatinib mesylate but not from control mice, suggesting that the receptors were functional and that the concentration of drug used was appropriate. Our data demonstrated that imatinib mesylate blocked both PDGFR-alpha and PDGFR-beta in vivo. It did not, however, affect the growth of melanoma cells expressing PDGFR, regardless of whether the cells expressed c-Kit.

Background: It has been proposed that melanoma progression involves a multistep process from benign nevi (BN), dysplastic nevi (DN), radial and vertical growth phase melanoma (MM) to metastatic melanoma (MMM). Protein tyrosine kinases (PTKs) may participate in this progression., Methods: Tissue microarray blocks of 89 melanocytic lesions were evaluated by immunohistochemistry for the expression of selected PTKs: c-kit, c-abl, abl-related gene (ARG), platelet-derived growth factor receptors alpha (PDGFR-alpha) and beta (PDGFR-beta)., Results: Seventeen of 31 (55%) MMM lacked expression of c-kit versus 100% expression (18/18) in DN and 96% expression (22/23) in MM; similarly, only 59% (10/17) of BN showed expression of c-kit. PDGFR-beta expression levels were similar in BN, DN, and MM, but lower in MMM. There was a trend toward lower expression of abl and ARG from BN to MMM. There was a marked decrease in staining intensity of ARG from BN to DN, MM, and MMM., Conclusion: Our results support that BN is different from DN and MM and that these two are different from MMM. Metastasis appears to be associated with loss of c-kit and PDGFR-beta expression. Since malignant melanoma expresses PTK, it may be a candidate for treatment with anti-PTK, such as STI-571 (Gleevec).

Temozolomide (Temodar) has demonstrated clinical activity against melanoma equivalent to that of intravenous dacarbazine (DTIC). Phase I clinical studies have shown that low dose chronic administration of temozolomide permits the delivery of higher dose intensities than a 5 day dose schedule. Temozolomide is hydrolysed to its active metabolite monomethyltriazenoimidazole carboxamide (MTIC) upon absorption from the gastrointestinal tract, while DTIC is inactive until it is metabolized in the liver to MTIC. In view of this, a higher concentration of MTIC will pass through the liver during the first pass when its source is temozolomide rather than DTIC. To determine if these characteristics of temozolomide will translate into a higher response rate than that achieved with DTIC, we conducted a phase II clinical trial of temozolomide in patients with uveal melanoma metastatic to the liver. Temozolomide was administered orally at a starting dose of 75 mg/m2 per day for 21 days every 4 weeks. Fourteen patients were enrolled in the trial. No complete or partial responses were observed. Stabilization of disease was achieved in two patients. The treatments were well tolerated. We conclude that, like DTIC, temozolomide at the dose and schedule studied in this trial is not effective for the control of metastatic melanoma of uveal origin.

Background: Interleukin-2 (IL-2) has activity in metastatic melanoma when given in high doses by the intravenous (IV) route, but its side effects and effectiveness when given in intermediate to high doses by the subcutaneous (SC) route have not been studied adequately. This study sought to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of IL-2 administered once daily by the SC route., Methods: Outpatients with progressive metastatic melanoma after chemotherapy were enrolled in a Phase I trial of IL-2 administered SC daily for 5 days per week for 4 consecutive weeks, repeated at 6-week intervals. Patients were instructed to drink at least 2 L of fluid daily. IL-2 pharmacokinetic studies were performed at the two highest dose levels. Toxicity was recorded weekly using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria. Response was assessed at 6-week intervals., Results: Three patients, 6 patients, 6 patients, and 4 patients received a median of 2 courses of SC IL-2 at dose levels of 6 MIU/m(2), 9 MIU/m(2), 12 MIU/m(2), and 15 MIU/m(2), respectively. Failure to maintain adequate fluid intake was responsible for 2 episodes of syncope at the 9 MIU/m(2) dose level and for 2 incidents of reversible prerenal azotemia at the 15 MIU/m(2) dose level. IL-2 treatment was resumed in these patients without incident. At the 15 MIU/m(2) dose level, 2 patients had severe headaches, depression, and visual hallucinations requiring discontinuation of treatment. Cough and fluid retention at the end of the third and fourth weeks at the 15 MIU/m(2) dose level approximated the symptoms reported by inpatients treated by continuous IV infusion at 9 MIU/m(2) on the same schedule. There was a partial response and a complete response in subcutaneous disease at the 12 MIU/m(2) and 15 MIU/m(2) dose levels, respectively, each lasting < 2 months. Plasma IL-2 levels after SC injection of 1000-5000 pg/mL reached maximum by 3 hours and were detectable for up to 48 hours after administration. The half-lives for SC IL-2 absorbance and clearance were 1.6 hours and 5.2 hours, respectively, and the calculated area under the curve was 30,584 pg/mL x hour., Conclusions: SC IL-2 was well tolerated and had high sustained bioavailability at the higher doses studied. The MTD for a daily SC regimen was 12 MIU/m(2) and is recommended for future studies., (Copyright 2002 American Cancer Society.DOI 10.1002/cncr.10631)

Purpose: The addition of cytokines to chemotherapy has produced encouraging results in advanced melanoma. In this phase III trial, we compared the effects of chemotherapy (cisplatin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine [CVD]) with those of sequential biochemotherapy consisting of CVD plus interleukin-2 and interferon alfa-2b., Patients and Methods: Metastatic melanoma patients who had not previously received chemotherapy were stratified by prognostic factors and given chemotherapy or biochemotherapy. CVD consisted of dacarbazine (days 1 and 22) and cisplatin and vinblastine (days 1 to 4 and 22 to 25). Biochemotherapy involved CVD with vinblastine reduced 25% plus interleukin-2 by 24-hour continuous infusion (on days 5 to 8, 17 to 20, and 26 to 29) and interferon alfa-2b by subcutaneous injection (on days 5 to 9, 17 to 21, and 26 to 30). Response was assessed every 6 weeks., Results: Among 190 patients enrolled, 91 were assessable for biochemotherapy and 92 for chemotherapy. Ten percent of the patients were alive a median of 52 months from start of therapy. Response rates were 48% for biochemotherapy and 25% for chemotherapy (P =.001); six patients given biochemotherapy and two given chemotherapy had complete responses. Median time to progression (TTP) was 4.9 months for biochemotherapy and 2.4 months for chemotherapy (P =.008); median survival was 11.9 and 9.2 months, respectively (P =.06). The influence of treatment on TTP and survival was confirmed in multivariate analyses with other prognostic factors not included in the original stratification. Biochemotherapy produced substantially more constitutional, hemodynamic, and myelosuppressive toxic effects., Conclusion: Cytokines substantially augment the antitumor activity of chemotherapy at the expense of considerable toxicity in patients with metastatic melanoma.

The camptothecin derivative 9-nitrocamptothecin (9-NC) has demonstrated clinical activity in patients with ovarian and pancreatic carcinomas. Preclinical studies have shown promising activity of 9-NC for melanoma. We have thus conducted a phase II clinical trial of 9-NC for patients with metastatic cutaneous and uveal melanoma. Twenty-eight patients were enrolled in the trial, with diagnoses evenly divided between the two types of melanoma. 9-NC was administered orally at a starting dose of 1.5 mg/m(2)/day for 5 consecutive days of each week. No complete or partial responses were observed. Stabilization of disease was achieved in four individuals (15%) for durations of 3, 4, 6 and 8 months. Hematologic toxicity was moderate. Gastrointestinal side effects were common with 43% of the patients experiencing grade 3 or 4 diarrhea and 18% reporting grade 3 or 4 vomiting. In contrast to other 9-NC clinical trials, no patients developed chemical cystitis with gross hematuria. We conclude that, in keeping with the general chemoresistance of melanoma, 9-NC at the dose and schedule studied in this trial is significantly toxic and is not active for metastatic melanoma of cutaneous or uveal origin.

In this phase II study we assessed the efficacy of bryostatin-1 (NSC 339555) in metastatic melanoma patients when given intravenously either once a week at a dose of 25 microg/m2 per day over 24 h for 3 weeks or at 40 microg/m2 per day over 72 h every 2 weeks. Treatment courses were repeated every 4 weeks. Patients who had received one prior chemotherapy regimen for advanced melanoma, with or without biotherapy, were randomized to one or the other bryostatin-1 dose schedules until 12 patients were registered to each arm. Because there was one confirmed response among the 12 patients who received the 72 h dose schedule, 25 more patients were added to that arm. No prophylactic medications were given. Objective tumour measurements were used to assess the efficacy of the regimen. The National Cancer Institutes common toxicity criteria were used to grade reactions. In total, 49 patients with metastatic melanoma, none having symptomatic brain metastasis, were studied. Of these, 12 patients received the 24 h bryostatin-1 regimen, while the remaining 37 received the 72 h regimen. One patient receiving the 72 h regimen had a partial response lasting over 7 months. Muscle pain occurred in over 90% of the patients and was the dose-limiting side effect of the 72 h regimen. Grade 3/4 nausea and vomiting were more common on the 24 h regimen than on the 72 h one (35% versus 5% of patients). There was no therapy-related thrombocytopenia. Neutropenia was mild and mainly limited to patients receiving the 72 h regimen. Bryostatin-1 has limited activity against melanoma when given by 72 h intravenous infusion.

Biochemotherapy, which combines traditional chemotherapy with immune modulating biologicals, produces an unexpectedly high response rate (>50%) in advanced melanoma patients. We hypothesize that immunological mechanism(s) are responsible for the increased response rate, and particularly that macrophage activation is involved in tumor reduction. Patients were randomized to receive chemotherapy, composed of cisplatin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (CVD), or biochemotherapy, which is CVD followed by interleukin (IL)-2 and IFN-alpha2b (CVD-BIO). Laboratory analysis was performed on sera from 41 patients from each arm. Measurements of macrophage activation (neopterin), nitric oxide production (nitrite), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), IL-1alpha, IL-1beta, IFN-gamma, IL-6, IL-10, and soluble IL-2 receptor (sIL-2R) were performed. Six of the nine biological responses (nitrite, neopterin, IFN-gamma, IL-6, soluble IL-2R, and IL-10) significantly (P < 0.0002) increased in the CVD-BIO patients but not in the CVD patients. The increased IL-6 (P = 0.04) and IL-10 (P = 0.05) correlated with patient response, but only when the minor responders were included in the analysis. Evidence of macrophage activation was found in CVD-BIO patients and not in those receiving CVD alone. In addition, an unusual cytokine elaboration composed of IL-6, IFN-gamma, IL-10, nitrite, neopterin, and sIL-2R, but not the expected TNF-alpha and IL-1, was detected. A trend of higher increase in IL-6 and IL-10 in patients having clinical response was found, suggesting an incomplete Th2 pattern of cytokine elaboration. These data show that macrophage activation does not appear to be critical in the response to CVD-BIO, but that IL-10 and IL-6 induced by the BIO component of the CVD-BIO were associated with tumor regression, and that their biology should be pursued further in the analysis of mechanism(s) of response.

Background: The authors tested a biotherapy regimen involving recombinant interferon-alpha-2a (rIFN-alpha-2a) and recombinant human interleukin-2 (rhIL-2), given in a "decrescendo" schedule over 5 days, for its activity and toxicity in 21 patients who previously had received chemotherapy for advanced melanoma., Methods: Patients (15 men and 6 women) were given intravenous rhIL-2 at a dose of 18 MIU/m(2) over 6 hours, followed by 18 MIU/m(2) over 12 hours, then 18 MIU/m(2) over 24 hours, and finally 4.5 MIU/m(2)/day for 3 consecutive days. rIFN-alpha-2a (10 MIU/m(2)) was given subcutaneously on Days 1-5. Courses were repeated every 4 weeks. Tumor sites were measured every 8 weeks. Toxicity was recorded using National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria., Results: No major objective responses were noted. The median number of courses given was two. The median time to progression was 2 months and the median survival was 6 months (range, 2-25 months). However, 2 patients with melanoma involving >/= 2 visceral organs (1 with a high baseline serum lactate dehydrogenase level) and a third with soft tissue metastases achieved durable control of disease and were alive a median of 30+ months later. A fourth patient had a palliative response with reversal of melanosis and a survival of 7 months. This regimen was well tolerated and resulted in no serious long term adverse effects., Conclusions: The response rate for this regimen was no greater than 10% with Type I and II errors each not exceeding 10%. Nevertheless, occasional durable control of disease and the nonoverlapping toxicity profile with prior chemotherapy support consideration of this regimen in these patients who have limited second-line treatment options., (Copyright 2000 American Cancer Society.)

For melanoma, in-transit metastases (ITMs) are a harbinger of systemic disease in over 70% of patients and thus warrant a systemic approach to management. In this study, previously untreated patients with ITMs (n=15) received a systemic regimen of 'CVD' in 21 day cycles (median, three cycles) as follows: dacarbazine 800 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) on day 1, vinblastine 1.6 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1-5, and cisplatin (CDDP) 100 mg/m2 by 24 h intra-arterial (i.a.) infusion in 1l of heparinized saline via the iliac or subclavian artery on day 3. There were three clinical complete responses (CRs) in patients with a modest burden of ITMs (< 3 cm in size) and seven partial responses (PRs), yielding a 67% response rate (95% confidence interval, 38-88%). One of the clinical CRs had microscopic residual disease at surgery (a pathological PR). The times to progression (TTP) for the CRs were 5, 21 and 38+ months; the median TTP for the PRs was 4.5 months (range, 2-10 months). Overall median survival was 31 months. Systemic toxicities were similar to those induced by i.v. CVD. However, patients noted more pronounced paraesthesia in the infused extremity. Also, two patients experienced severe CDDP-induced burns, one patient developed brachial plexopathy, and one patient had a haemorrhage in an occult brain metastasis. The high clinical activity of this regimen will have to be confirmed in more patients before a first-pass i.a. advantage can be claimed. Furthermore, the dose, schedule and technique of i.a. CDDP delivery must be further refined before it can be routinely incorporated in regimens as an alternative to isolated regional hyperthermic perfusion, which is technically more difficult and is not readily available in community-based hospitals.

A phase II study was undertaken to determine the efficacy of tirapazamine combined with cisplatin in patients with metastatic melanoma between April 1996 and April 1997. Tirapazamine 390 mg/m2, administered i.v. over 2 h, followed in 1 h by cisplatin 75 mg/m2 over 1 h, were used every 21 days to treat chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic melanoma. Objective tumor measurements were used to assess efficacy of the regimen. NCI common toxicity criteria were used to grade toxicities. Forty-eight patients with metastatic melanoma of cutaneous or mucosal origin, none with symptomatic brain metastasis, were treated. Nine patients had a partial response, with an overall response rate of 20% (95% confidence interval: 9-33%). The median duration of response was 6 months. Grade 3 nausea, vomiting, anorexia, muscle cramps and fatigue occurred in fewer than 10% of patients. Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were rare. This outpatient single-day administered tirapazamine-cisplatin regimen has definite activity in chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic melanoma. Further studies in combination with other agents active against this disease are warranted.

Treatment options for patients with stage IV melanoma are limited. Based on differences in the toxicity and activity profiles of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (doxil) compared to standard doxorubicin, we have conducted a phase II trial of doxil for patients with metastatic melanoma. Doxil was administered as a 60-90 min intravenous infusion every 21 days. The starting dose was 60 mg/m2 for the initial nine patients, but was subsequently reduced to 50 mg/m2 for the remainder due to toxicity issues. Thirty-two patients were enrolled in the trial. Ninety-one percent had received prior systemic therapy. There were no complete responses and two partial responses for an overall response rate of 6%. The dominant side effects included hand-foot syndrome, rash (occasionally severe), and stomatitis, consistent with reports from other trials using similar doses and schedules. We conclude that doxil does not demonstrate sufficient activity in metastatic melanoma to warrant further investigation into its use in this setting.

Our results with concurrent biochemotherapy in patients with stage IV melanoma have been encouraging. Based on these data, we conducted a phase II study to determine the clinical and histological response rate to neoadjuvant concurrent biochemotherapy in patients with local-regional metastases of cutaneous melanoma (stage III). A total of 65 patients with biopsy-proven, measurable and potentially resectable local-regional disease (nodal, satellite/in-transit metastases and/or local recurrence) were treated with cisplatin 20 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) on days 1 to 4, vinblastine 1.5 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1 to 4, dacarbazine 800 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 only, interleukin-2 9 MIU/m2 per day i.v. by 96 h continuous infusion on days 1 to 4, and interferon-alpha 2a 5 MU/m2 subcutaneously on days 1 to 5, repeated every 3 weeks. Patients underwent surgery after two to four courses of biochemotherapy. Those with tumour regression after two preoperative courses received two additional postoperative courses. Of the 64 patients assessable for clinical response, 28 (44%) had a partial response. Of the 62 patients whose response was assessed histologically, four (6.5%) had no evidence of viable tumour in the surgical specimen (pathological complete remission, pCR) and 27 (43.5%) had a partial response, giving an overall response rate of 50%. Tumour burden did not correlate with response, although patients who achieved a pCR had a significantly lower tumour burden (P = 0.02). Our phase II study indicates that neoadjuvant biochemotherapy is an active treatment for melanoma patients with local-regional metastases. However, it is unclear if biochemotherapy is more active than chemotherapy alone; phase III randomized trials are ongoing to answer this question in patients with stage IV disease.

The purpose of this study was to determine whether a combination of two anti-idiotypic antibodies that mimic the high molecular weight proteoglycan antigen found on most melanoma tumors was capable of enhancing cellular immunity in vaccinated high-risk patients with melanoma. Twenty-eight stage I-IV high-risk patients with melanoma were immunized with a mixture of variable concentrations of MELIMMUNE-1 and MELIMMUNE-2, along with the adjuvant SAF-m, using two immunization schedules. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were collected before the first immunization and 4 weeks after the final immunization and tested for in vitro proliferation to MELIMMUNE-1 and MELIMMUNE-2 and for cytotoxicity against 51Cr-labeled target cell lines. Additionally, supernatants from in vitro proliferation cultures were tested for interleukin 10 and IFN-gamma levels. Significant in vitro proliferation to MELIMMUNE-1 and MELIMMUNE-2 were observed in postimmunization samples but not in prevaccination samples. The mean stimulation index for MELIMMUNE-2 (33.7 +/- 0.6) was significantly higher than that for MELIMMUNE-1 (13.9 +/- 0.3; P < 0.025). Supernatants obtained from 78% of the in vitro stimulated cultures pre- or postvaccination contained significant levels of interleukin 10 (range, 0.43-142 pg/ml), whereas IFN-gamma levels were elevated in 53% of postvaccination samples (range, 3-245 pg/ml) but not prevaccination samples. More importantly, we were able to generate specific CTL responses in 43% of the patients, which correlated with elevated IFN-gamma levels. These results indicate that MELIMMUNE enhances cell-mediated immunity in patients with melanoma.

Purpose: To evaluate the antitumor activity and toxicity of concurrent biochemotherapy that uses cisplatin, vinblastine, and docarbazine (DTIC) (CVD) in combination with interferon alfa-2a (IFN-alpha) and interleukin-2 (IL-2) in patients with metastatic melanoma., Patients and Methods: Between October 1992 and October 1993, 53 patients with a documented diagnosis of metastatic melanoma with measurable lesions and an Eastern Oncology Cooperative Group (ECOG) performance status of 2 or less were enrolled onto this study. Patients were required to have no clinically significant cardiac dysfunction and to be free from symptomatic brain metastases. The treatment consisted of cisplatin 20 mg/m2 daily for 4 days; vinblastine 1.6 mg/m2 daily for 4 days; and DTIC 800 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) day 1 with IL-2 9 x 10(6) IU/m2 i.v. by continuous infusion daily for 4 days and IFN-alpha 5 x 10(6) U/m2 subcutaneously daily for 5 days, repeated at 21-day intervals. Response was assessed after two cycles and patients who responded were continued on treatment for a total of six cycles., Results: Among 53 assessable patients, 11 patients (21%) achieved a complete response (CR) and 23 patients (43%) achieved a partial response (PR), for an overall objective response rate of 64%. The median time to disease progression for all patients was 5 months. The median survival of all patients entered onto the trial was 11.8 months. Among the 11 patients who achieved a CR, five patients (9%) have remained in continuous CR for 50+ to 61+ months. The toxicity of biochemotherapy consisted of severe myelosuppression, significant nausea and vomiting, and moderately severe hypotension that required inpatient hospital care for each 5-day cycle of treatment. There were no treatment-related deaths., Conclusion: Concurrent biochemotherapy for patients with advanced melanoma is capable of producing high CR and overall response rates and resulted in durable complete remissions in a small fraction of patients. Toxicity, although severe, was manageable in a routine inpatient hospital environment.

The combination of cisplatin-based chemotherapy with interleukin-2 (IL-2) and interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha), referred to as biochemotherapy, has produced overall response rates of greater than 50% in advanced melanoma patients, with durable complete responses in the range of 5-10%. The mechanism of action of biochemotherapy is unknown. Preclinical work suggests synergistic interactions between the cytotoxic agents, especially cisplatin, and the biological agents in killing melanoma cells. Immune effector cells activated by the components of the biochemotherapy may also be involved, as direct cytotoxic effectors and/or as sources of secondary cytokines, which can induce nitric oxide (NO) production in a wide variety of cell types. In addition, high levels of neopterin, a marker of monocyte/macrophage activation, have been found in patients undergoing immunotherapy or biochemotherapy for melanoma. Based on these data, we hypothesized that the degree of elevation of serum NO metabolic products and neopterin during treatment would correlate with the response to biochemotherapy in melanoma patients. Blood samples were obtained before and during preoperative biochemotherapy with cisplatin, vinblastine, dacarbazine, IL-2 and IFN-alpha in 45 melanoma patients with locoregionally advanced disease. NO was measured as nitrite after enzymatic reduction, using the colorimetric assay of Griess, and neopterin was measured by radioimmunoassay. Our results demonstrate a higher day 5 nitrite level (of borderline statistical significance, P = 0.057) in major responders to the therapy than in those who did not achieve a major response, while there was no difference in the elevation in neopterin level during therapy between major and non-major responders. These results suggest that induction of NO during biochemotherapy may be playing a role in the mechanism of action of this therapy, while the role of monocyte/macrophage activation is still in question.

The combination of cisplatin-based chemotherapy with interleukin-2 (IL-2) and interferon, referred to as biochemotherapy, has shown encouraging results in patients with advanced melanoma. Toxicity is high, however and no objective parameters exist to distinguish between patients who are likely to respond and those who are not. The purpose of this pilot study was to determine whether in vitro cisplatin-induced damage to the glutathione S-transferase-pi (GST-pi) gene in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) before therapy correlated with the histological response in melanoma patients with local-regional metastases who received concurrent biochemotherapy before definitive surgery. Before therapy, PBMCs from 16 patients were exposed to cisplatin at concentrations of 25, 50 or 100 microM for 3 h and the extent of damage to the GST-pi gene was quantitated by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Patients were subsequently treated on a biochemotherapy regimen consisting of cisplatin 20 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) on days 1-4, vinblastine 1.5 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1-4, dacarbazine 800 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1, IL-2 9 MIU/m2 per day i.v. by continuous infusion on days 1-4 (total of 96 h), and interferon alpha2a 5 MU/m2 subcutaneously on days 1-5. The 16 patients were categorized into two groups: major responders (n = 7) and non-major responders (n = 9). Although we observed a wide interpatient variation, a statistically significant correlation existed between the histological response and the degree of DNA damage caused in the PBMCs at all three cisplatin concentrations tested (P = 0.024 for 25 microM; P = 0.036 for 50 microM; P = 0.007 for 100 microM). Our pilot study suggests that determination of in vitro cisplatin-induced DNA damage using a gene-specific PCR assay may be useful in predicting the histological response to biochemotherapy.

Purpose: The current American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) staging system distinguishes between soft tissue and visceral metastases in advanced (stage IV) melanoma. We sought to verify these staging criteria and to identify prognostic variables that could be used to evaluate the impact of systemic therapy on long-term survival during the prior decade., Patients and Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of patients with advanced cutaneous melanoma enrolled in clinical trials between 1979 and 1989 at The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center. Pretreatment age, sex, number of organs with metastases, serum levels of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and albumin, and period of enrollment were analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards model of survival., Results: In univariate and multivariate analyses that involved 318 stage IV patients, normal serum levels of LDH and albumin, soft tissue and/or single visceral organ metastases (especially lung), female sex, and enrollment late in the decade were independent positive predictors for survival. In multivariate analyses, the current AJCC criteria did not significantly predict outcome. Systemic treatment response did not bias these results, and only 4% of patients had a complete response. Patients who lived more than 2 years (11%) had a mix of favorable prognostic characteristics and a high frequency of systemic or surgically induced complete response., Conclusion: This study supports the use of stratification parameters that reflect the favorable prognostic impact of soft tissue or single visceral organ metastases and normal serum levels of LDH and albumin at time of enrollment in advanced melanoma trials. Improved survival over the prior decade probably reflects advances in diagnostic and palliative interventions.