Search

Patients with severely decreased glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (i.e., chronic kidney disease [CKD] G4+) are at increased risk for kidney failure, cardiovascular disease (CVD) events (including heart failure), and death. However, little is known about the variability of outcomes and optimal therapeutic strategies, including initiation of kidney replacement therapy (KRT). Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) organized a Controversies Conference with an international expert group in December 2016 to address this gap in knowledge. In collaboration with the CKD Prognosis Consortium (CKD-PC) a global meta-analysis of cohort studies (n = 264,515 individuals with CKD G4+) was conducted to better understand the timing of clinical outcomes in patients with CKD G4+ and risk factors for different outcomes. The results confirmed the prognostic value of traditional CVD risk factors in individuals with severely decreased GFR, although the risk estimates vary for kidney and CVD outcomes. A 2- and 4-year model of the probability and timing of kidney failure requiring KRT was also developed. The implications of these findings for patient management were discussed in the context of published evidence under 4 key themes: management of CKD G4+, diagnostic and therapeutic challenges of heart failure, shared decision-making, and optimization of clinical trials in CKD G4+ patients. Participants concluded that variable prognosis of patients with advanced CKD mandates individualized, risk-based management, factoring in competing risks and patient preferences.

We have assessed gravimetric methods for determination of intravascular water, established whole blood-, plasma- and erythrocyte water reference values in a healthy volunteer group (n = 97, 48 females) and correlated these variables with 30 simultaneous hematological, clinicochemical and body parameters. The water standard was 55.56 mol/kg = 100 mass%. For erythrocyte water determination three methods were evaluated: 2 indirect methods were easy to perform, the third, using a hematocrit centrifuge, was the most reliable. Imprecision (within-batch coefficient of variation (CV), %) was excellent: whole blood 0.2, plasma 0. 1, erythrocytes 0.7-2.2 and recoveries (means, %) 99.7- 100. 1. Serum water was found to be slightly higher than plasma water. Volunteer group, mean reference values, mass%: whole blood water 79.7, plasma water 91.2, erythrocyte water, three methods 66.2, 64.6 and 64.2, respectively. Females had mean 1.6 mass% higher whole blood water and 0.9-1.0 mass% higher erythrocyte water than males with no difference in plasma water. In the volunteer group whole blood water correlated strongly with hematocrit (r = -0.96), hemoglobin (r = -0.94) and erythrocytes (r = -0.85) and centrifuge hematocrit (r = -0.91). Plasma water correlated strongly with plasma total protein (r = -0.74, all correlations P

We have assessed gravimetric methods for determination of intravascular water, established whole blood-, plasma- and erythrocyte water reference values in a healthy volunteer group (n = 97, 48 females) and correlated these variables with 30 simultaneous hematological, clinicochemical and body parameters. The water standard was 55.56 mol/kg = 100 mass%. For erythrocyte water determination three methods were evaluated: 2 indirect methods were easy to perform, the third, using a hematocrit centrifuge, was the most reliable. Imprecision (within-batch coefficient of variation (CV), %) was excellent: whole blood 0.2, plasma 0. 1, erythrocytes 0.7-2.2 and recoveries (means, %) 99.7- 100. 1. Serum water was found to be slightly higher than plasma water. Volunteer group, mean reference values, mass%: whole blood water 79.7, plasma water 91.2, erythrocyte water, three methods 66.2, 64.6 and 64.2, respectively. Females had mean 1.6 mass% higher whole blood water and 0.9-1.0 mass% higher erythrocyte water than males with no difference in plasma water. In the volunteer group whole blood water correlated strongly with hematocrit (r = -0.96), hemoglobin (r = -0.94) and erythrocytes (r = -0.85) and centrifuge hematocrit (r = -0.91). Plasma water correlated strongly with plasma total protein (r = -0.74, all correlations P