Search

The rare European species Atrichobrunettia (Mirousiella) graeca Ježek et Goutner, 1993 and the invasive species Clogmia albipunctata (Williston, 1893) (both Diptera: Psychodidae) are newly recorded from “Dunele Marine de la Agigea” Nature Reserve from Romania. The updated checklist of non-Phlebotomine species of the family Psychodidae for Romania with 53 species is given.

The identity and distribution of a neglected fungus gnat species, Rymosia tolleti Burghele-Balacesco, 1965, in Europe is reviewed based on examination of newly collected specimens as well as available museum mate-rials. Rymosia tolleti is widespread but rather rare in Central Europe, with confirmed records from Romania, Slo-vakia, Germany, and France. All the specimens with known collection details originate from cave environments. Detailed photographs of the male terminalia are provided for the first time, along with two unique DNA barcodes for the species.

Human and animal vector-borne diseases, particularly mosquito-borne diseases, are emerging or re-emerging worldwide. Six Aedes invasive mosquito (AIM) species were introduced to Europe since the 1970s: Aedes aegypti, Ae. albopictus, Ae. japonicus, Ae. koreicus, Ae. atropalpus and Ae. triseriatus. Here, we report the results of AIMSurv2020, the first pan-European surveillance effort for AIMs. Implemented by 42 volunteer teams from 24 countries. And presented in the form of a dataset named “AIMSurv Aedes Invasive Mosquito species harmonized surveillance in Europe. AIM-COST Action. Project ID: CA17108”. AIMSurv2020 harmonizes field surveillance methodologies for sampling different AIMs life stages, frequency and minimum length of sampling period, and data reporting. Data include minimum requirements for sample types and recommended requirements for those teams with more resources. Data are published as a Darwin Core archive in the Global Biodiversity Information Facility- Spain, comprising a core file with 19,130 records (EventID) and an occurrences file with 19,743 records (OccurrenceID). AIM species recorded in AIMSurv2020 were Ae. albopictus, Ae. japonicus and Ae. koreicus, as well as native mosquito species. This study was funded by the Autonomous Province of Trento (Italy) under the project ‘Coordinated surveillance actions on invasive alien species and emerging vector borne diseases’; the City Health Office of the City of Zagreb, within the ‘Program for monitoring invasive mosquito species in the area of the City of Zagreb in 2020’; the Consejería de Economía e Infraestructura of the Junta de Extremadura and the European Regional Development Fund, a Way to Make Europe, through the research project IB16135; Dirección de Salud Pública (Gobierno Vasco), Project EU-LIFE 18 IPC/ES/000001 (Urban Klima 2050) y Programa Estatal de Vigilancia de mosquitos en puertos y Aeropuertos, del Ministerio de Sanidad (Gobierno de España); EMME-CARE project, which has been funded from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme (grant agreement ID 856612); Institute of Zoology under the project EVOLANTER (project no. 20.80009.7007.02). RL is funded by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research of Germany (BMBF) under the project NEED (grant no. 01Kl2022); LIFE CONOPS project (LIFE12 ENV/GR/000466), funded by the European Commission in the framework of the program LIFE + Environment Policy and Governance; Municipalities of Slovenia: City Municipality of Nova Gorica, City Municipality of Koper, Municipality of Izola, Municipality of Piran and Municipality of Ankaran; National Research, Development and Innovation Office (NKFIH grant numbers KH-130379, PD-135143, FK-138563 and K-135841). The research activity of KK was supported by the Janos Bolyai Research Scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences and by the ÚNKP-20-5-PTE-597 New National Excellence Program of the Ministry for Innovation and Technology; Portuguese National Program for Vector Surveillance (REVIVE) and we are particularly grateful to the regional workgroup of Algarve for the monitoring activities; PR (19_ECO_0070) project ‘Aves y Enfermedades Infecciosas Emergentes: Impacto de las Especies Exóticas y Migratorias en la transmisión de Malaria aviar y el virus del Nilo Occidental – AvEIEs’ from ‘Ayudas Fundación BBVA a Equipos de Investigación Científica 2019’; project grant number 57 PCCDI/2018, grant agency ‘The Executive Unit for Financing Higher Education, Research, Development and Innovation’ (UEFISCDI) Romania, ‘Collegium Talentum Programme’ of Hungary, Eötvös Loránd University’s ‘Homeland higher education study grant’; Slovak Research Agency VEGA nr. 2/0140/21; Vector Control Needs Assessment in Cyprus, contracted by the World Health Organization (reference 2020/1040069-0); Veneto and Friuli Venezia Giulia Regions (Regional Prevention Plans ‘Entomological Surveillance of vector-borne diseases’ in the Veneto and Friuli Venezia Giulia Regions); the Institute of Public Health, Albania under the program of mosquitoes control in urban and coastal areas.

In total 65 Diptera species from 20 families (Anisopodidae (2 spp.), Asilidae (1), Bibionidae (1), Clusiidae (1), Culicidae (8), Dolichopodidae (7), Drosophilidae (4), Dryomyzidae (1), Empididae (2), Heleomyzidae (5), Hybotidae (5), Lauxaniidae (4), Limoniidae (9), Opomyzidae (2), Pallopteridae (2), Psychodidae (6), Rhagionidae (2), Scatopsidae (1), Trichoceridae (1) and Ulidiidae (1)) were recorded. The species Drapetis flavipes Macquart, 1834 (Hybotidae), is recorded for the first time in Slovakia. Ten species belong among uncommon or rare (namely: Atypophthalmus (Atypophthalmus) inustus (Meigen, 1818), Calliopum splendidum Papp, 1978, Dioctria linearis (Fabricius, 1787), Cheilotrichia (Empeda) neglecta (Lackschewitz, 1927), Chrysopilus asiliformis (Preyssler, 1791), Ochlerotatus (Ochlerotatus) nigrinus (Eckstein 1918), Philosepedon (Philosepedon) austriacum Vaillant, 1974, Suillia variegata (Loew, 1862), Toxoneura modesta (Meigen, 1830) and Trichomyia urbica Curtis, 1839). On the other hand, two invasive species are also reported. Drosophila (Sophophora) suzukii (Matsumura, 1931) is an invasive crop pest and Aedes (Finlaya) japonicus japonicus (Theobald, 1901) is an invasive biting pest, a potential vector for various diseases. City parks are also important from the point of view of Diptera biodiversity and more attention needs to be paid to them.

New faunistic data from the northern Hercynian Mountains and adjacent localities (Czech Republic) collected mostly at 52 sites in 2004–2010 are presented. Altogether, 88 species of moth flies (adults) of 38 genera (approximately 49% of all species of the family registered from the Czech Republic) are known to occur in this area. Twenty of these species were classified in the national Red List 2005 of threatened invertebrates and 14 are nationally scarce, suitable for further monitoring. Katamormia bezzii (Salamanna, 1983) and Berdeniella longispinosa (Vaillant, 1985) are new for Bohemia. In the appendix, the updated checklist of family Psychodidae is given for the Czech Republic and Slovakia.

Pneumia fuehzulii sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 07B400D8-6775-4C2E-8B0B-E2BB2D7D4818 Figs 1–20 Differential diagnosis Pneumia fuehzulii sp. nov. resembles P. canescens (Meigen, 1804) in body size, as well as wings, and less distinctly visible characters, such as the shape of aedeagal complex. It clearly differs by stronger CuA 2 (Fig. 13), M3, CuA1 and CuA2 not touched basally. Hypandrium with two swellings in the middle and a deep cleft between them (Figs 8, 16). Gonostyli almost straight (Figs 8, 17–18), distiphallus straight, pointed, extending a little beyond the parameres (dorsal view). Parameres sickle-shaped (Figs 19–20). Apertures of the epandrium small, circular. Remainders of ventral epandrial plate V-shaped, conspicuous (Figs 7, 15). Pneumia canescens is readily distinguishable by CuA 2 not strengthened (Jung 1956: 235, fig. 128). M 3, CuA 1 and CuA 2 touched basally. Hypandrium broader in the middle (Jung 1956: 235, fig. 130; Vaillant 1979: tab. lxxxiv, fig. 9). Gonostyli bent (Vaillant 1979: tab. lxxxiv, fig. 9), distiphallus straight, pointed, as long as the parameres, not sickle-shaped. Basal two apertures of epandrium conspicuous (Vaillant 1979: tab. lxxxiv, fig. 9). Remainders of ventral epandrial plate not detected. Etymology This species is named in honour of the famous medieval Turkish-Azerbaijan poet Məhəmməd Süleyman oğlu Füzuli. Material examined Holotype AZERBAIJAN • 1 ♂; Qəbələ district, Durca; 41.037750° N, 47.886583° E; 1310 m a.s.l.; 9 May 2019; J. Oboňa et al. leg.; Loc. AZE 28; sweep netting, forest edge and brook; slide with a dissected specimen, Cat. No. 34949, Inv. No. 26006; NMPC. Paratypes AZERBAIJAN • 3 ♂♂; same collection data as for holotype; slide, some specimens dissected, Cat. No. 34950 to 34952, Inv. No. 26007 to 26009; NMPC • 1 ♂; Balakən distr., Balakən, Mahamalar; 41.7370700° N, 46.4372111° E; 465 m a.s.l.; 9 May 2019; J. Oboňa et al. leg.; Loc. AZE 25; sweep netting, open small brook (clay, micro-, mesolithal) and marsh, pasture/forest; slide, Cat. No. 34953, Inv. No. 26010; NMPC. Description Male HEAD. As long as broad (Fig. 1); vertex conically inflated with numerous setae, alveoli almost irregularly spaced over its entire surface, with 3–4 supraocular bristles on dorsal margins of eyes on extreme lateral sides of head. Horizontal border of setae above the upper apices of the eyes developed, slightly convex in the middle. Eyes separated (Figs 1, 9); interocular suture conspicuously sclerotized, inverted V-shaped, sclerotized parts gradually tapering from eyes to median, not fused medially, connected by thin ligament. Eye bridge with 5 facet rows (Fig. 9), divided by the approximate width of 4 facet diameters. Ratio of distance of apices of eyes (tangential points) to minimum width of frons approximately 3.5:1. Frontoclypeus (Fig. 1) with a large almost oval central patch of irregular insertions of setae with narrow medial lobe prolonged to interocular suture. Antennae with scape, pedicel and 14-segmented flagellum (Figs 2, 10) haired. Sensory filaments (ascoids) not observed. Scape a little prolonged, barrel-shaped, 1.2 times as long as ovoid pedicel. Both parts with many narrow scales (for size, see Fig. 2). First flagellomere cylindrical (1.1 times as short as pedicel), medial flagellomeres decreasing in size, spindleshaped. Apical progressively bulbous, with a globular apiculus (digit), excentric, 2.1 times as short as the bases bearing them. Mouthparts hardly extend beyond basal palp segments. Length ratios of palpus segments 1.0:1.0:1.2:1.8; last palp segment annulate (Fig. 3). For the terminal lobes of labium, as shown in Fig. 4, lines of spines between both lobes are developed, tongue protuberances in between distally are inconspicuous. Cibarium proximally with a pair of conspicuous bent sclerotized arms, ratio of maximum length of cibarium to length of epipharynx 2.4:1 (Fig. 11), labrum pointed. THORAX. Anepisternum setae patch almost semicircular between spiracle and wing insertion (Fig. 5). Spiracles set high on mesothorax. No thoracic allurement organs, anepimeron with triangular setose patch. Wings (Fig. 13) ovoid, 3.3 mm long in holotype, 3.0– 3.1 mm in paratypes, rounded distally, inconspicuously expanded at posterior margin. Membrane of wing generally clear; however, sometimes distal part of cell, fork areas, ends of all veins excl. Sc and middle part of CuA 2 clouded. Strengthened parts of veins: Sc, R 1 (not the start), R 2+3, basal cell, R 5, whole CuA 2 and almost all wing veins distally. Radial and medial forks arise at the same level, both forks conspicuously in a basal position to end of CuA 2. R5 ends slightly beyond wing apex. Bases of M 3, CuA 1 and CuA 2 are not connected. Wing index (wing length to width) 2.5. Halteres (Fig. 12) stick-shaped, symmetrical in longitudinal axis, bent and haired, with mass of sensory scales subapically. Ratio of maximum length of halteres to their maximum width 2.7:1. Length ratios of femora, tibiae and first tarsomeres: P 1 2.1:2.3:1.0, P 2 2.3:2.8:1.1, P 3 2.7:3.5:1.2. Paired tarsal claws of P 1 conspicuously backward hooked (Fig. 6) with ventral teeth. MALE GENITALIA. Basiphallus of the male aedeagal complex (Figs 8, 19–20) straight from dorsal view (incl. some small differences – Fig. 19), proximally spoon-shaped, triangular, narrowed and edging distally (Figs 8, 19), with longitudinal rib proximally, a little arched in lateral view (Fig. 20). Spatula modified from two broad rectangular bases to a parallel inner deep cleft (Figs 8, 19). Distiphallus straight, pointed, bent dorsally in lateral view (Fig. 20), extending a little beyond the parameres (however, distiphallus sometimes two times longer – see paratype Cat. No. 34953 and Inv. No. 26010 from AZE Loc. 25). Parameres sickle-shaped (Figs 19–20). Ratio of length of gonocoxites to length of aedeagal complex (incl. basiphallus) 1:1.9. Gonocoxites cylindrical (Figs 8, 17), approximately as long as the gonostyli from dorsal view. Gonostyli with circular base, almost straight, waving subapically (Fig. 18), pointed. Epandrium (Figs 7, 14) approximately quadrilateral, caudal half with numerous setae on both sides. Basal two apertures circular, divided, conspicuously bordered by sclerotized folds. Remainders of ventral epandrial plate V-shaped (Figs 7, 15), sclerotized laterally on both sides, with an approximately oval soft part inside, distally with two conspicuous external protrudent corners and near base of the epipropct with two miniature ones. Hypandrium narrow in connection with epandrium; however, the former broad, bar-shaped, with two swellings in the middle and a deep cleft between them (Figs 8, 16). Epiproct relatively small, with an almost semicircular caudal ending or fold, covered with short microsetae (Figs 7, 14–15). Hypoproct large, triangular or tongue-shaped, 0.4 times as long as the epandrial appendages, haired caudally (Figs 7, 14–15). Epandrial appendages (Figs 7, 14) about 1.8 times as long as the epandrium, curved slightly in the middle, and tenacula (numbers 9–12 are stable) restricted to clusters near the rounded apex, gradually becoming shorter towards top of epandrial appendages. Tenacula endings not fringed. Female Unknown. Bionomics Unknown. Adults (males) were collected in montane or hilly habitats, specifically swampy areas of pasture or forest brooks. Distribution Currently recorded only from Azerbaijan., Published as part of Ježek, Jan, Oboňa, Jozef & Manko, Peter, 2022, New synonymy and two new species of Caucasian moth flies (Diptera, Psychodidae, Psychodinae) from Azerbaijan and Georgia, pp. 48-63 in European Journal of Taxonomy 823 (1) on pages 50-54, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2022.823.1813, http://zenodo.org/record/6628047, {"references":["Jung H. F. 1956. Beitrage zur Biologie, Morphologie und Systematik der europaischen Psychodiden (Diptera). Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift 3: 97 - 257."]}

Thornburghiella salihi sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: B37FA190-53E9-4F00-9937-1DCA00B54BA0 Figs 21–42 Differential diagnosis Thornburghiella salihi sp. nov. resembles T. erinacea (Krek, 1970) comb. nov. in body size, as well as wing shape. Thornburghiella erinacea is readily distinguishable by a scapus 2.4 times as long as the postpedicel. Flagellomere 1 (postpedicel) cucumber-shaped, straight, 3.2 times as long as the following flagellomere (Krek 1970a: 89, fig. 5). Postpedicel with 8 conspicuous, strong bristles arranged in a row. Terminal flagellomere twice as long as the foregoing one, with a little prolonged digit in the axis (Krek 1970a: 89, fig. 3). Gonostyli are with a conspicuous bulbous base (Krek 1970a: 89, fig. 1, sic!) and bent. Distiphallus narrower in the middle; for details, see Krek (1970a: 89, figs 1–2). Table 1 with a morphological comparison shows that Ulomyia erinacea and the new species suggest their belonging to Thornburghiella rather than to Ulomyia. Etymology This species is named in honour of Salih Krek (University of Sarajevo), a famous taxonomist and collector of Psychodidae in the area of the Balkan Peninsula. Material examined Holotype AZERBAIJAN • 1 ♂; Qəbələ district, Durca, Dəmiraparançay river; 41.0541119° N, 47.8868831° E; 1615 m a.s.l.; 10 May 2019; J. Oboňa et al. leg.; Loc. AZE 27; sweep netting, waterfall in canyon and steep fast brook (mega-, macrolithal) passing to a brook in a broad alluvium in a U-shaped valley; slide with a dissected specimen, Cat. No. 34954, Inv. No. 26011; NMPC. Paratypes AZERBAIJAN • 3 ♂♂; same collection data as for holotype; slides, some specimens dissected, Cat. No. 34955, 34956, Inv. No. 26012, 26013; NMPC. GEORGIA • 1 ♂; Batsara Nature Reserve, Samkura River and Khadori waterfall on its tributary; 42.274323° N, 45.351664° E; 1250 m a.s.l.; 2 May 2019; J. Oboňa et al. leg.; Loc. GEO 33; sweep netting; Cat. No. 34957, 34958, Inv. No. 26014, 26015; NMPC • 1 ♂; Mtskheta-Mtianeti region, below Mejilaurni stream; 42.323233° N, 44.646100° E; 1210 m a.s.l., 28 Jun. 2019; J. Oboňa et al. leg.; Loc. GEO 12; sweep netting; Cat. No. 34959, Inv. No. 26016; NMPC • 1 ♂; Ukanamkhari; 42.332017° N, 44.607283° E; 1565 m a.s.l., 28 Jun. 2019; J. Oboňa et al. leg.; Loc. GEO 16; torrent; Cat. No. 34960, Inv. No. 26017; NMPC • 1 ♂; Gveleti village, Gveleti Waterfalls and Tibistskali stream; 42.704444° N, 44.620833° E; 1570 m a.s.l.; 6 Jul. 2019; P. Manko leg.; Loc. GEO 214; sweep netting; Cat. No. 34961, Inv. No. 26018; NMPC. Description Male HEAD. Hardly as long as broad. Vertex conspicuously conically inflated dorsally, forming a V-inverted sclerotized hood with a cut top. The numerous setae alveoli are spaced almost regularly over the entire surface of the upper half of head, with 3–4 supraocular bristles near dorsal margins of the eyes on the extreme lateral sides, despite scar-free striped areas above C-shaped compound eyes medially and laterally. Dorsolateral margins of the eyes are undulant. Eyes separated, interocular suture broadly V-shaped, more sclerotized basally, with a tongue-shaped inconspicuous ligament (Figs 21, 35); eye bridge formed by five facet rows; inner rows of the eyes are reduced to three facets. Minimum distance between eyes corresponds approximately to 2.4 facet diameters; index of distance from tangential points of eye apices to minimum of frons 3.2. Setae alveoli of the frontoclypeus arranged in an almost semicircular, centrally placed patch near the base of the antennae, tapering to a dorsoventral irregular strip of hairs close below the frontal suture (Figs 21, 35). Antenna with 16 articles; scape club-shaped, cylindrical (Fig. 2), somewhat widened apically, 2.7 times as long as its maximum width, narrowed at base, 6.0 times as long as its minimum width. Pedicel almost globular, symmetrical. Flagellomere 1 (postpedicel) pear-shaped, as long as the two following flagellomeres together (Fig. 22), or shorter (Fig. 24, paratype Cat. No. 34955, Inv. No. 26012 from Loc. AZE 27), 1.3 times as long as the second flagellomere. Postpedicel with 3–6 conspicuous, strong bristles arranged in a row. Scape and pedicel with stiletto-shaped scales in contrast to needle-shaped macrosetae of flagellomeres. Flagellomeres 2–12 ovoid, with needle-shaped paired ascoids (Fig. 22), a little bent, shorter than the flagellomeres in which they are inserted; apical pear-shaped flagellomere a little longer than the previous one (Fig. 23), sometimes the last flagellomeres are fused with a long apiculus in the longitudinal axis (Fig. 25, paratype Cat. No. 34956, Inv. No. 26013 from Loc. AZE 27). Length ratio of maxillary palp segments 1.0:1.3:1.4:1.6; apical segment annulated (Fig. 26). Terminal labial lobes (Fig. 36) with diverging rows of spines between them, tongue distal protuberances are inconspicuous. Ratio of maximum length of cibarium (Fig. 37) to length of epipharynx approximately 1.4:1. THORAX. Anepisternum setae patch almost semicircular between spiracle and wing insertion (Fig. 27), anepimeron with a striped setae patch. Spiracles set high on the mesothorax. Patagium not developed. Wings (Fig. 38) lanceolate, 2.7 mm in holotype, 2.4–3.1 mm in paratypes, rounded distally, a little expanded at the posterior margin. Ending of R 5 is beyond the tip of the wing. Wing membrane slightly infuscated only between Sc, R 1 and C. The following veins or their parts strengthened: Sc with conspicuously marked origin and end, R 1 (not the start), R 2, R 5, basal field, CuA 1 (conspicuously basally) and CuA 2. Radial fork complete in contrast to medial one. Both forks and the ending of CuA 2 are in one line (almost central area of wing). Wing index 2.5. Bases of M 3, CuA 1 and CuA 2 are not connected. Knob of halteres hardly globular, a little cut apically, with close sensory microsetae subapically, a prolonged stem as usually developed (Fig. 28). Ratio of maximum length of halteres to their maximum width approximately 2.5:1. Ratios of lengths of femora, tibiae and first tarsal segments P 1 2.2:2.4:1.0, P 2 2.4:2.8:1.2, P 3 2.6:3.4:1.3. Paired tarsal claws of P 1 almost straight, gradually tapering, hooked only subapically (Fig. 29). MALE GENITALIA. Basiphallus almost straight from dorsal view (Figs 31, 41), only sometimes strangulated proximally (Fig. 33), a little undulated from lateral view (Fig. 42). Spatula at the base of aedeagal complex shortly bilobed (Figs 31, 41), distiphallus keg-shaped, prolonged, with inner pipe bordered by indefinable parallel folds and a telescopic gonoporus strengthened by sclerotized, distally connected rounded folds (Figs 31, 34, 41–42). Gonocoxites almost cylindrical, without bulbose base (Figs 31–32, 40), as long as the gonostyli. Epandrium (Figs 30, 39) rectangular, with two divided areas of insertions of hairs distally). Basal paired apertures conspicuous, mostly separated with irregular margins; however, may be connected in a single oval aperture, see paratype from the site Loc. AZE 27, Cat. No. 34955, Inv. No. 26012 (only one male). Ventral epandrial plate not developed (Figs 30, 39). Hypandrium narrow without a lobulus in the middle (Figs 31, 41). Epiproct inconspicuous, triangular, covered with microsetae; hypoproct conspicuous, tongue-shaped, setose, rounded apically from dorsal view (Figs 30, 39), 1.1 times as long as the epandrium. Epandrial appendages strong, cylindrical and straight from dorsal view, enlarged a little basally in contrast to the top (Fig. 39), bent from lateral view (Fig. 30). Tenacula (numbers 9–12) restricted to a cluster near the rounded apex and gradually becoming shorter towards apex of the epandrial appendages (Figs 30, 39). Female Unknown. Comments Krek´s Sijaricia (as subgenus) must be synonymized with Thornburghiella because T. erinacea was established by him as type species (monotypy) of the genus Ulomyia. Bionomics Unknown; males were collected near montane waterfalls and streams or confluences of rivers, approximately 1200–1600 m a.s.l. Distribution Currently recorded only from Georgia and Azerbaijan., Published as part of Ježek, Jan, Oboňa, Jozef & Manko, Peter, 2022, New synonymy and two new species of Caucasian moth flies (Diptera, Psychodidae, Psychodinae) from Azerbaijan and Georgia, pp. 48-63 in European Journal of Taxonomy 823 (1) on pages 54-59, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2022.823.1813, http://zenodo.org/record/6628047, {"references":["Krek S. 1970 a. Description de cinq especes nouvelles de Psychodidae de Yougoslavie. Bolletino della Associazione Romana di Entomologia 25 (4): 87 - 95.","Vaillant F. 1982. Some comments on the classification of the Psychodidae Psychodinae (Diptera). Bulletin de la Societe entomologique de France 87: 292 - 301.","Enderlein G. 1935. Zur Klassifikation der Psychodinen. Sitzungsberichte der Gesellschaft Naturforschender Freunde zu Berlin 1935: 246 - 249."]}

Genus Pneumia Enderlein, 1935 Pneumia Enderlein, 1935: 247. Type species: Pericoma palustris Meigen, 1804, original designation. Satchelliella Vaillant, 1979: 249. Type species Pericoma mutua Eaton, 1893, subsequent designation p. 255. (Satchelliella Vaillant, 1971, was unavailable without a designation of a type species). Pneumia – Enderlein 1937: 28. — Duckhouse 1987a: 231 (Satchelliella = syn. of Pneumia). — Ježek 1997: 63. — Wagner & Beuk 2002: 86. — Ježek & Omelková 2007: 252. — Salmela 2008: 13. — Svensson 2009: 186. Satchelliella – Salamanna & Raggio 1984: 29. — Wagner 1990: 35. — Wagner & Masteller 1992: 105. — Krek 1999: 7, 304. — Bernotienè 2002: 4. Only selected data are quoted here, for a complete list of synonymies, see Omelková & Ježek 2012, incl. differential diagnosis., Published as part of Ježek, Jan, Oboňa, Jozef & Manko, Peter, 2022, New synonymy and two new species of Caucasian moth flies (Diptera, Psychodidae, Psychodinae) from Azerbaijan and Georgia, pp. 48-63 in European Journal of Taxonomy 823 (1) on page 50, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2022.823.1813, http://zenodo.org/record/6628047, {"references":["Enderlein G. 1935. Zur Klassifikation der Psychodinen. Sitzungsberichte der Gesellschaft Naturforschender Freunde zu Berlin 1935: 246 - 249.","Vaillant F. 1971 - 1983. Psychodidae - Psychodinae (not finished). In: Lindner E. (ed.) Die Fliegen der palaearktischen Region 287 (1971): 1 - 48; 291 (1972): 49 - 78; 292 (1972): 79 - 108; 305 (1974): 109 - 142; 310 (1975): 143 - 182; 313 (1977): 183 - 206; 317 (1978): 207 - 238; 320 (1979): 239 - 270; 326 (1981): 271 - 310; 328 (1983): 311 - 357.","Enderlein G. 1937. Klassifikation der Psychodiden (Dipt.). Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift 3 - 4 (1936): 81 - 112.","Duckhouse D. A. 1987 a. A revision of Afrotropical Setomima, elucidation of their genealogical relationships and descriptions of other Afrotropical Psychodinae (Diptera: Psychodidae). Annals of the Natal Museum 28 (2): 231 - 282.","Jezek J. 1997. New and interesting taxa of moth flies (Diptera, Psychodidae) from different moist biotopes of the Palaearctic region. Casopis Narodniho Muzea, Rada Prirodovedna 166: 105 - 122.","Wagner R. & Beuk P. L. T. 2002. Family Psychodidae. In: Beuk P. L. T. (ed.) Checklist of the Diptera of the Netherlands: 85 - 88. KNNV Uitgeverij, Utrecht.","Jezek J. & Omelkova M. 2007. Faunistic records of the Czech Republic and Slovakia. Psychodidae. Dipterologica Bohemoslovaca 14: 250 - 253.","Salmela J. 2008. Semiaquatic fly (Diptera, Nematocera) fauna of fens, springs, headwater streams and alpine wetlands in the northern boreal ecoregion, Finland. W-album 6: 3 - 63.","Svensson B. W. 2009. Fjarilsmyggfaunan i ett hagmarksomrade och en ladugard i ostra Blekinges skogsland. Med en oversikt av familjen Psychodidae: s morfologi, systematik och utforskande, samt sarskilt de svenska Psychoda s. l. - arternas biologi. Entomologisk Tidskrift, Uppsala 130 (3 - 4): 185 - 208.","Salamanna G. & Raggio S. 1984. Synopsis of the Psychodinae from the Ligurian Alps and Apennines. Annali del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Genova 85: 1 - 42.","Wagner R. 1990. Family Psychodidae. In: Soos A. & Papp L. (eds) Catalogue of Palaearctic Diptera 2: 11 - 65. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest and Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam.","Wagner R. & Masteller E. C. 1992. Long term population changes of Psychodidae (Diptera) from a stream recovering from sewage effluent and a control stream. Limnologica 22 (2): 105 - 113.","Krek S. 1999. Psychodidae (Diptera Insecta) Balkanskog Poluotoka [Psychodidae (Diptera Insecta) of the Balkan Peninsula]. Federacija Bosne i Hercegovine, Ministarstvo Obrazovanja, Nauke, Kulture i Sporta, Studentska Stamparija Univerziteta Sarajevo, Sarajevo. [In Croatian.]","Bernotiene R. 2002. Moth flies (Diptera, Psychodidae) new for Lithuanian fauna. Ekologija, Vilnius 2: 4 - 8.","Omelkova M. & Jezek J. 2012. Two new species of Pneumia Enderlein (Diptera, Psychodidae, Psychodinae) from the Palaearctic region. Zootaxa 3180 (1): 1 - 18. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 3180.1.1"]}

2. Boreus hyemalis (Linnaeus, 1767) Boreus Hiemalis L [sic!]: Nowicki 1864: 61; 1865: 61 [faunistics] Boreus hiemalis L.: Dziędzielewicz 1867: 162; 1891: 47 [faunistics]; Fudakowski 1923: 202 [distribution] Boreus hiemalis Lin. [sic!]: Majewski 1882: 16; 1885: 1; Dziędzielewicz 1914: 43 [faunistics]; Łomnicki 1914: 110 [faunistics]; Dziędzielewicz 1918: 40 [distribution, ecology] Boreus hyemalis (Linné): Svensson 1972: 27; Penny 1977: 204 [taxonomy, distribution] Boreus hyemalis (Linnaeus) [sic!]: Penny 1977: 204 [taxonomy, distribution] Published records: Lviv [Klepariv], under Poland (Nowicki 1864, 1865; Dziędzielewicz 1867, 1891, 1914, 1918; Majewski 1882, 1885; Penny 1977; Łomnicki 1914; Fudakowski 1923; Svensson 1972). Reviewed material: SMNH collection, 1 ♂, E21.03.01.02/01: “Kleparów Koło Lwowa 19. XII ”; “1”; “ Boreus hiemalis Linnaeus ”, [19.12.?, Lviv]; 1 ♂, E21.03.01.02/02: “ Kleparów Koło Lwowa 19. XII ”; “2”; “ Boreus hiemalis Linnaeus ”, [19.12.?, Lviv]; 1 ♂, E21.03.01.02/03: “ Kleparów Koło Lwowa. 21.11.1897.”; “3”; “ Boreus hiemalis Linnaeus ”, [12.11.1897, Lviv]; 1 ♀, E21.03.01.02/04: “ Czarnohora Foreszczynka 2.-20. XII.1911.”; “4”; “ Boreus hiemalis Linnaeus ”, [2.- 20.12.1911,?]. Remarks: Majewski (1885) reported this species as “pospol. w całym kraju” [common throughout the country], meaning former territories of the Crown of the Kingdom of Poland, which were separated in that time between the Russian and Austro-Hungarian Empires (including Halychyna within the current territory of Ukraine). Penny (1977) mentioned this species from the former territory of Poland, presumably based on previously published historical data. This idea is also confirmed by a published map on figure 81, where one of the distributional points is situated in the western part of Ukraine, close to the Carpathians. All data mentioned by Fudakowski (1923) are based on J. Dziędzielewicz’s and E. Majewski’s reports (the same for B. westwoodi). Mentioned by Dziędzielewicz (1918), specimens of P. hyemalis are preserved in the SMNH collection, except the specimen from Lviv marked in the paper as “19.I” (missing). An additional specimen of a female was collected on the Chornohora Mountains., Published as part of Dvořák, Libor, Mariychuk, Ruslan, Manko, Peter, Oboňa, Jozef, Krzemiński, Wiesław & Godunko, Roman J., 2022, Present knowledge on Mecoptera of Ukraine, pp. 459-483 in Zootaxa 5141 (5) on page 463, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5141.5.3, http://zenodo.org/record/6593148, {"references":["Linnaeus, C. (1767) s. n. In: Systema naturae per regna tria naturae: secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Regnum Animale. 2. Laurentii Salvii, Holmiae [Stockholm], pp. 533 - 1327. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 156772","Nowicki, M. (1864) Przyczynek do owadniczej fauny Galicyi. Drukarnia Uniwersytecka w Krakowie, Krakow, 87 pp.","Nowicki, M. (1865) Insecta Haliciae Musei Dzieduszyckiani. Typis Universitatis Jagellonicae, Cracoviae, 87 pp.","Dziedzielewicz, J. (1867) Wykaz owadow siatkoskrzydlych (Neuroptera). Sprawozdania Komisji Fizjograficznej c. k. Towarzystwa naukowego Krakowskiego. Materyaly do fizyografii Galicyi, Krakow, 1, 158 - 165.","Dziedzielewicz, J. (1891) Przeglad fauny krajowej owadow siatkoskrzydlych (Neuroptera, Pseudoneuroptera). Sprawozdania Komisji Fizjograficznej Akademii Umiejetnosci w Krakowie, 26, 26 - 151.","Fudakowski, J. (1923) Znane i nowe stanowiska Borens hiemalis L. i B. westwoodi Hag. (Neuropteroidea - Mecoptera). (Neue und bekannte Standorte von Boreus hiemalis L. u. B. westwoodi Hag. in Polen). Polskie Pismo Entomologiczne, 2 (4), 202 - 204.","Majewski, E. (1882) Systematyczny wykaz owadow Zylkoskrzydlych polskich u nas dotad znalezionych. Insecta Neuroptera Polonica. Ksiegarnia Gebethnera i Wolffa, Warszawa, 42 pp.","Majewski, E. (1885) Owady Zylkoskrzydle (Neuroptera Polonica). Systematyczny wykaz krajowych sieciarek i prasiatnic. Materyaly do fauny krajowej. Nakladem ksiegarni Teodora Paprockiego i S-ki, Warszawa, 1 - 2, 1 - 39.","Dziedzielewicz, J. (1914) O owadzie Posniezku (Boreus), zyjacym na ziemiach Polski. Kosmos, 29 (1 - 3), 42 - 45.","Lomnicki, J. (1914) Zarys fauny okolic Lwowa. Rozprawy i Wiadomo s ci z Muzeum im. Dzieduszyckich. Lwow, 1 (1 - 2), 109 - 111.","Dziedzielewicz, J. (1918) Owady siatkoskrzydlowate ziem Polski (Insecta neuropteroidea Poloniae terrarum). Rozprawy i Wiadomo s ci z Muzeum im. Dzieduszyckich, Lwow, 4 (1 - 4), 38 - 40.","Svensson, S. A. (1972) Boreus Latreille, 1825 (Mecoptera). A Synopsis of Described Species. Insect Systematics & Evolution, 3 (1), 26 - 32. https: // doi. org / 10.1163 / 187631272 X 00049","Penny, N. D. (1977) A systematic study of the family Boreidae (Mecoptera). The University of Kansas science bulletin, 51, 141 - 217."]}

8. Panorpa connexa MacLachlan, 1869 Panorpa connexa MacLachlan, 1869: Martynova 1957: 732 [morphology, taxonomy, key, distribution] Published records: Kropyvnytskyi (Martynova 1957). Remarks: Martynova (1957) reported the presence of two specimens of P. connexa housed in collection of ZIN RAS, labelled as “ЕлиЗаветград [ныне Кировоград], Херс. г. 20 v 91, Яцентковский” [Elisavethrad town [now Kirovograd], Khersonska huberniya, 20.05.1891, leg. A.V. Yatsentkovskii] and concluded that the label is correct. Willmann (1975, 1978a) reported P. connexa only from the Caucasus and northern Turkey along the Caspian Sea. The presence of P. connexa in Ukraine should be confirmed., Published as part of Dvořák, Libor, Mariychuk, Ruslan, Manko, Peter, Oboňa, Jozef, Krzemiński, Wiesław & Godunko, Roman J., 2022, Present knowledge on Mecoptera of Ukraine, pp. 459-483 in Zootaxa 5141 (5) on page 470, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5141.5.3, http://zenodo.org/record/6593148, {"references":["Martynova, O. M. (1957) Skopionnitsy (Mecoptera) fauny SSSR. II Semeistvo Panorpidae. [Scorpion-flies (Mecoptera) of USSR fauna. II The family Panorpidae]. Entomologicheskoe obozrenie, 36 (3), 721 - 747. [in Russian]","Willmann, R. (1975) Die Gattung Panorpa in der Turkei. Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien, 79, 543 - 564.","Willmann, R. (1978 a) Bemerkungen zu anatolischen Mecopteren. Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien, 81, 517 - 523."]}

7. Panorpa communis Linnaeus, 1758 Panorpa communis L.: Belke 1859: 83; Dziędzielewicz 1867: 162; 1884: 2; 1891: 48; Wierzejski 1883: 253 [faunistics]; Lezhenina et al. 2009: 98; Chaplygina 2016: 103 [distribution] Panorpa Communis L [sic!]: Nowicki 1864: 61; 1865: 61 [faunistics] Panorpa Leopoliensis: Dziędzielewicz 1867: 162 nomen nudum [faunistics] Panorpa communis Lin.: Nowicki 1867: 118; 1870: 14; Łomnicki 1877a: 147; Majewski 1882: 16; 1885: 1 [faunistics]; Dziędzielewicz 1918: 38 [distribution, ecology] Panorpa communis: Łomnicki 1877b: 188; Kopytko 2009: 91 [faunistics] Panorpa Leopoliensis Dziędz. [sic!]: Majewski 1882: 16; 1885: 1 [faunistics] Panorpa communis. L. [sic!]: Dziędzielewicz 1898: 193 [faunistics] Panorpa communis Lin. var. diffinis M’L. (vulgaris Imhoff): Dziędzielewicz 1905: 113 [faunistics] Panorpa leopoliensis Dz.: Dziędzielewicz 1891: 49 [faunistics] Panorpa communis Linné: Martynova 1957: 724 [morphology, taxonomy, key, distribution] Panorpa communis Linnaeus, 1758: Dvořák et al. 2017: 15 [faunistics, distribution] Published records: Anheliv, Borshchiv, Buchach, Chornohora, Ciscarpathian region, Drohobych, Dzvenyhorod, Halychyna, Ivano-Frankove, Kamyanets-Podilskyi, Kharkiv, Lviv, Melnytsya-Podilska, Mukachevo, Penyaky, Poland, Siverskyi Donets river in Kharkivska Region, Stanisławów, Ukraine, Uzhhorod, Yaremcha, Zakarpatska Region (Belke 1859; Nowicki 1864, 1865, 1867, 1970; Dziędzielewicz 1867, 1884, 1989, 1891, 1905, 1918; Łomnicki 1877a, 1877b; Majewski 1882 *, 1885 *; Wierzejski 1883; Martynova 1957; Kopytko 2009; Lezhenina et al. 2009; Chaplygina 2016; Dvořák et al. 2017, 2019). Reviewed material: SMNH collection: 1 ♀, E21.01.01.03/02: “ 17.-6.-1907. Worochta.”; “ Panorpa communis Linnaeus, 1758 det. WK”, [17.6.1907, Vorokhta]; 1 ♀, E21.01.01.03/03: “ Lwów okolice.”; “ Panorpa communis Linnaeus, 1758 det. WK”, [?, Lviv]; 1 ♀, E21.01.01.03/04: “Chomiak. P. Weredyk. 25.-7.-1907.”; “ Panorpa communis Linnaeus, 1758 det. WK”, [25.7.1907,?]; 1 ♂, E21.01.01.03/05: “Galicja”; “ Panorpa communis Linnaeus, 1758 det. WK”, [?, Galicia]; 1 ♂, E21.01.01.03/07: “Worochta. Okolice. 2.-8.-1907.”; “ Panorpa communis Linnaeus, 1758 det. WK”, [2.8.1907, Vorokhta]; 1 ♂, E21.01.01.03/08: “Janów 31.5.1903 ”; “ Panorpa communis Linnaeus, 1758 det. WK”, [31.5.1903, Ivaniv]; 1 ♀, E21.01.01.03/09: “Wertełka. 26. V.”; “ Panorpa communis Linnaeus, 1758 det. WK”, [26.5.?, Vertelka]; 1 ♀, E21.01.01.03/10: “Mikuliczyn 31.VII.”; “ Panorpa communis Linnaeus, 1758 det. WK”, [31.7.?, Mykulychyn]; 1 ♂, E21.01.01.03/11: “Worochta. Okolice. 2.-8.-1907.”; “ Panorpa communis Linnaeus, 1758 det. WK”, [2.8.1907, Vorokhta]; 1 ♂, E21.01.01.03/12: “Galicja”; “ Panorpa communis Linnaeus, 1758 det. WK”, [?, Galicia]; 1 ♀, E21.01.01.03/14: “Mikuliczyn. Polonica. 5.-VII”; “ Panorpa communis Linnaeus, 1758 det. WK”, [5.7.?, Mykulychyn]; 1 ♀, E21.01.01.03/15: “ 7.5.1903 Wulka park.”; “ Panorpa communis Linnaeus, 1758 det. WK”, [7.5.1903,?]; 1 ♀, E21.01.01.03/16: “Worochta. Okolice. 2.-8.-1907.”; “ Panorpa communis Linnaeus, 1758 det. WK”, [2.8.1907, Vorokhta]; 1 ♂, E21.01.01.03/17: “Galicja?”; “ Panorpa communis Linnaeus, 1758 det. WK”, [?, Galicia]; 1 ♂, E21.01.01.03/18: “Mikuliczyn. Polonica. 5.-VII”; “ Panorpa communis Linnaeus, 1758 det. WK”, [5.7.?, Mykulychyn]; 1 ♂, E21.01.01.03/19: “Worochta. Okolice. 2.-8.-1907.”; “ Panorpa communis Linnaeus, 1758 det. WK”, [2.8.1907, Vorokhta]; 1 ♂, E21.01.01.03/20: “Mikuliczyn. Polonica. 5.VIII.”; “ Panorpa communis Linnaeus, 1758 det. WK”, [5.7.?, Mykulychyn]; 1 ♀, E21.01.01.03/21: “Mikuliczyn. Polonica. 5.-VII”; “ Panorpa communis Linnaeus, 1758 det. WK”, [5.7.?, Mykulychyn]; 1 ♂, E21.01.01.03/22: “Brzuchowice 23. V.”; “ Panorpa communis Linnaeus, 1758 det. WK”. Other three specimens from SMNH were collected in current territory of Poland labeled as follows: 1 ♂, E21.01.01.03/01: “Tatry”; “ Panorpa communis Linnaeus, 1758 det. WK”, [?, Tatry Mountains?]; 1 ♂, E21.01.01.03/06: “Okolice Warszawy. Zb. Oserloff.”; “ Panorpa communis Linnaeus, 1758 det. WK”, [?, Warsaw]; 1 ♂, E21.01.01.03/13: “Krzeszowice 4.IX”; “ Panorpa communis Linnaeus, 1758 det. WK”, [?, Krzeszowice]. New material examined: 1 ♂, Zakarpatska Region, Perechyn district, Kamyanetskyi, 48°48’37.4”N 22°28’33.3E ”, sweep netting, 11.08.2015; 1 ♂, ibid, Uzh upstream Uzhhorod, 48°36’37.5”N 22°13’49.6”E, sweep netting, 10.08.2015; 3 ♂, 1 ♀, Mukacheve district, near “Pearl of the Carpathians” resort, 48°31’25.8”N 22°52’06.7”E, beer traps in the forest and in trees at the stream, 06.05.2018 – 20.05.2018; ibid, Uzhhorod, 48°39’22.1”N 22°19’50.2”E, beer traps in the garden, apple trees, 01.05.2018 – 31.05.2018 (1 ♂); ibid 20.08.2018 – 26.08.2018 (8 ♀); 2 ♂, 3 ♀, ibid, Uzhhorod, 48°39’22.4”N 22°19’52.2”E, beer traps in oak forest (10 meters at the road), 01.05.2018 – 31.05.2018; 1 ♀, Klyucharky, forest, 48°24’23.5”N 22°39’39.7”E, beer trap, 13.– 28.07.2020; 7 ♂, 12 ♀, Klyucharky, abandoned field, 48°24’23.159”N 22°39’5.414”E, beer trap, 13.– 28.07.2020; 3 ♂, 1 ♀, Klyucharky, abandoned field, 48°24’23.159”N 22°39’5.414”E, beer trap, 27.8.– 11.09.2020. Remarks: The species name P. leopoliensis [with author’ remark “ mihi in litt. Lwów (w maju) ”] was used for the first time in the paper published by (Dziędzielewicz 1867: 162) and should be recognized as a nomen nudum. Later, Dziędzielewicz (1891: 49) reported the similarity of P. leopoliensis with P. communis, and opted to not describe the first species because the specimens were soured. In later contribution, Dziędzielewicz (1905: 113) added more information about ecology and distribution of P. leopoliensis in the Gorgany Mountains. Almost four decades later, Farbotko (1929b: 4) suggested the identity of P. leopoliensis and P. communis based on analysis of J. Dziędzielewicz’s publication from 1891. In Majewski (1882, 1885) a few different species of Panorpa most probably are treated under the single species name P. communis. The record from Kamyanets-Podilskyi in Dziędzielewicz (1891) is published based on Belke (1859). It is probable that many older records, as well as part of the material in this work from SMNH, belong to P. vulgaris (see comments under that species)., Published as part of Dvořák, Libor, Mariychuk, Ruslan, Manko, Peter, Oboňa, Jozef, Krzemiński, Wiesław & Godunko, Roman J., 2022, Present knowledge on Mecoptera of Ukraine, pp. 459-483 in Zootaxa 5141 (5) on pages 469-470, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5141.5.3, http://zenodo.org/record/6593148, {"references":["Linnaeus, C. (1758) Systema natura per regna tria naturae secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Vol. 1. 10 th Edition. Salvii, Holmiae, 824 pp. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 542","Belke, G. (1859) Rys historyi naturalnej Kamienca podolskiego [Esquisse l'histoire naturelle de Kamienietz Podolski]. Drukarnia Gazety Codziennej, Warszawa, 1859, 1 - 114.","Dziedzielewicz, J. (1867) Wykaz owadow siatkoskrzydlych (Neuroptera). Sprawozdania Komisji Fizjograficznej c. k. Towarzystwa naukowego Krakowskiego. Materyaly do fizyografii Galicyi, Krakow, 1, 158 - 165.","Dziedzielewicz, J. (1884) Sieciwki (Neuroptera) i Prasiatnice (Pseudoneuroptera) zebrane na Pokuciu w cigu lata 1883. Sprawozdania Komisji Fizjograficznej Akademii Umiejetnosci w Krakowie, 18, 1 - 5 (223 - 229).","Dziedzielewicz, J. (1891) Przeglad fauny krajowej owadow siatkoskrzydlych (Neuroptera, Pseudoneuroptera). Sprawozdania Komisji Fizjograficznej Akademii Umiejetnosci w Krakowie, 26, 26 - 151.","Wierzejski, A. (1883) Dodatek do fauny sieciowek (Neuroptera). Sprawozdania Komisji Fizjograficznej Akademii Umiejetnosci w Krakowie, 17, 253 - 255.","Chaplygina, A. B. (2016) Konsortyvni zvyazky kropyvyanky chornoholovoi (Sylvia atricapilla L.) u lisovykh tsenozakh livoberezhnoi Ukrainy. [The consortial relations of Eurasian blackcap (Sylvia atricapilla L.) in the forest cenoses of left bank Ukraine]. Studia Biologica, 10 (1), 99 - 110. [in Ukrainian, English summary] https: // doi. org / 10.30970 / sbi. 1001.464","Nowicki, M. (1864) Przyczynek do owadniczej fauny Galicyi. Drukarnia Uniwersytecka w Krakowie, Krakow, 87 pp.","Nowicki, M. (1865) Insecta Haliciae Musei Dzieduszyckiani. Typis Universitatis Jagellonicae, Cracoviae, 87 pp.","Nowicki, M. (1867) Instrukcya dla dostrzegaczy pojawow w swiecie zwierzecym. Sprawozdania Komisji Fizjograficznej c. k. Towarzystwa naukowego Krakowskiego. Materyaly do fizyografii Galicyi, Krakow, 1, 1 - 29.","Nowicki, M. (1870) Zapiski faunicze. Sprawozdania Komisji Fizjograficznej Akademii Umiejetnosci w Krakowie, 4, 1 - 28.","Lomnicki, M. (1877 a) Sprawozdanie z wycieczki zoologicznej odbytej na Podolu w r. 1876 pomiedzy Seretem, Zbruczem a Dniestrem. Sprawozdania Komisji Fizjograficznej Akademii Umiejetnosci w Krakowie, 11, 128 - 156.","Majewski, E. (1882) Systematyczny wykaz owadow Zylkoskrzydlych polskich u nas dotad znalezionych. Insecta Neuroptera Polonica. Ksiegarnia Gebethnera i Wolffa, Warszawa, 42 pp.","Majewski, E. (1885) Owady Zylkoskrzydle (Neuroptera Polonica). Systematyczny wykaz krajowych sieciarek i prasiatnic. Materyaly do fauny krajowej. Nakladem ksiegarni Teodora Paprockiego i S-ki, Warszawa, 1 - 2, 1 - 39.","Dziedzielewicz, J. (1918) Owady siatkoskrzydlowate ziem Polski (Insecta neuropteroidea Poloniae terrarum). Rozprawy i Wiadomo s ci z Muzeum im. Dzieduszyckich, Lwow, 4 (1 - 4), 38 - 40.","Lomnicki, M. (1877 b) Spostrzezenia pojawow w swiecie zwierzecym w r. 1876. 3. W Stanislawowie przez Prof. Lomnickiego. Sprawozdania Komisji Fizjograficznej Akademii Umiejetnosci w Krakowie, 11, 188.","Kopytko, U. (2009) Konsorty Astrantia major L. v Chornohori (Ukrainski Karpaty). [The consorts of Astrantia major L. in Chornohora (Ukrainian Carpathians). Visnyk Lviv University, Serie Biology, 51, 89 - 92. [in Ukrainian, English summary]","Dziedzielewicz, J. (1898) Wiadomosci o owadach siatkoskrzydlych (Neuroptera) zawarte w roczniku z r. 1896 czasopisma ni- emieckiego: Illustrite Wochenschrift fur Entomologie Neudamm i porownanie spostrzezen o pojawie odnosnych gatunkow w krajach Polski a w szczegolnosci Galicyi. Kosmos, 22, 190 - 197.","Dziedzielewicz, J. (1905) Sieciarki (Neuroptera genuia) i Prasiatnice (Archiptera) zebrane w ciagu lat 1902 i 1903. Sprawozdania Komisji Fizjograficznej Akademii Umiejetnosci w Krakowie, 38, 104 - 125.","Martynova, O. M. (1957) Skopionnitsy (Mecoptera) fauny SSSR. II Semeistvo Panorpidae. [Scorpion-flies (Mecoptera) of USSR fauna. II The family Panorpidae]. Entomologicheskoe obozrenie, 36 (3), 721 - 747. [in Russian]","Dvorak, L., Haenni, J. - P., Maca, J., Mariychuk, R. & Obona, J. (2017) Some insects (Dermaptera, Diptera, Mecoptera) from beer traps in Uzhhorod City (Ukraine). Acta Universitatis Presoviensis, Folia Oecologica, 9 (2), 11 - 17.","Lezhenina, I. P., Gramma, V. N., Chaplygina, A. B. & Savinskaya, N. A. (2009) Chlenistonogie v gnezdakh mukholovki-beloshei- ki v nagornoi dubrave (Kharkovskaya oblast). [Arthropods in nests of Muscicapa albicollis in highland oak-grove (Khar- kov Region)]. Nauchnyie vedomosti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Yestestvennyie nauki, 3 (58), 95 - 100. [in Russian, English summary]","Dvorak, L., Haenni, J. - P., Dvorakova, K., Kameneva, E. P., Mariychuk, R., Manko, P., Obona, J. & Korneyev, V. A. (2019) Some insects from beer traps in Westernmost Ukraine. Ukrainska Entomofaunistyka, 10 (2), 1 - 6. https: // dx. doi. org / 10.5281 / zenodo. 3584947","Farbotko, J. (1929 b) Materjaly do znajomosci aparatu kopulacyjnego wojsilek (Panorpa) = Materialien zur Kenntnis der Geni- talapparates der Panorpaten. Prace Towarzystwa przyjaciol nauk w Wilnie, 5 (16), 1 - 43."]}

─ Panorpa picta Hagen, 1863 Panorpa picta Hag.: Martynova 1957: 731; Dorokhova & Martynova 1987: 104 [morphology, taxonomy, key, distribution] Remarks: The occurrence in the Crimea was published by Martynova (1957) and repeated by Dorokhova & Martynova (1987). As Willmann (1975) stated, Panorpa picta is a nomen dubium, and the data from Crimea are unclear because they are based on females only., Published as part of Dvořák, Libor, Mariychuk, Ruslan, Manko, Peter, Oboňa, Jozef, Krzemiński, Wiesław & Godunko, Roman J., 2022, Present knowledge on Mecoptera of Ukraine, pp. 459-483 in Zootaxa 5141 (5) on page 471, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5141.5.3, http://zenodo.org/record/6593148, {"references":["Hagen, H. (1863) Die Odonaten- und Neuropteren-Fauna Syriens und Klein-Asiens. Wiener entomologische Monatsschrift, 7, 193 - 199.","Martynova, O. M. (1957) Skopionnitsy (Mecoptera) fauny SSSR. II Semeistvo Panorpidae. [Scorpion-flies (Mecoptera) of USSR fauna. II The family Panorpidae]. Entomologicheskoe obozrenie, 36 (3), 721 - 747. [in Russian]","Dorokhova, G. I. & Martynova, O. M. (1987) Otryad Mecoptera. Skorpionovye mukhi. [The order Mecoptera. Scorpion-flies. Key of the insects of the European part of SSSR]. Opredelitel nasekomykh Evropeiskoi chasti SSSR, 4 (VI), 97 - 107. [in Russian]","Willmann, R. (1975) Die Gattung Panorpa in der Turkei. Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien, 79, 543 - 564."]}