Search

Nutcracker esophagus ( NE), Jackhammer esophagus ( JHE), distal esophageal spasm ( DES), and hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter ( HTLES) are defined by esophageal manometric findings. Some patients with these esophageal motility disorders also have abnormal gastroesophageal reflux. It is unclear to what extent these patients' symptoms are caused by the motility disorder, the acid reflux, or both. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication ( LNF) on esophageal motility disorders, gastroesophageal reflux, and patient symptoms. Between 2007 and 2013, we performed high-resolution esophageal manometry on 3400 patients, and 221 patients were found to have a spastic esophageal motility disorder. The medical records of these patients were reviewed to determine the manometric abnormality, presence of gastroesophageal symptoms, and amount of esophageal acid exposure. In those patients that underwent LNF, we compared pre- and postoperative esophageal motility, gastroesophageal symptom severity, and esophageal acid exposure. Of the 221 patients with spastic motility disorders, 77 had NE, 2 had JHE, 30 had DES, and 112 had HTLES. The most frequently reported primary and secondary symptoms among all patients were: heartburn and/or regurgitation, 69.2%; respiratory, 39.8%; dysphagia, 35.7%; and chest pain, 22.6%. Of the 221 patients, 192 underwent 24-hour pH monitoring, and 103 demonstrated abnormal distal esophageal acid exposure. Abnormal 24-hour pH monitoring was detected in 62% of patients with heartburn and regurgitation, 49% of patients with respiratory symptoms, 36.8 % of patients with dysphagia, and 32.6% of patients with chest pain. Sixty-six of the 103 patients with abnormal 24-hour pH monitoring underwent LNF. Thirty-eight (13 NE, 2 JHE, 6 DES, and 17 HTLES) of these 66 patients had a minimum of 6-month postoperative follow-up that included clinical evaluation, esophageal manometry, and 24-hour pH monitoring. Postoperatively, all 38 patients had normal distal esophageal acid exposure. Of these 38 patients, symptoms resolved in 28 and improved in 10. Of six patients (one with NE, two JHE, and three with HTLES) that underwent postoperative esophageal manometry, five exhibited normal motility. Typical reflux symptoms are common among patients with esophageal hypermotility disorders. Abnormal 24-hour pH monitoring is present in the majority of patients with who report typical reflux symptoms and almost half of patients who report respiratory symptoms. Conversely, the majority of patients who report dysphagia or chest pain have normal distal esophageal acid exposure. Based on a small number of patients in this study, it also appears that motility disorders often improve after LNF. LNF is associated with resolution or improvement in reflux related symptoms and esophageal motility parameters in patients exhibiting abnormal esophageal acid exposure. This suggests that patient symptoms are due to abnormal acid exposure and not the motility disorder. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Examines the role of laparoscopy and thoracoscopy (L&T) in the treatment of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Provision of effective palliation through surgical resection; Evaluation on the postoperative recovery in L&T; Investigations on the use of neoadjuvant radiation and chemotherapy regimes.

Examines the role of laparoscopy and thoracoscopy (L&T) in the treatment of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Provision of effective palliation through surgical resection; Evaluation on the postoperative recovery in L&T; Investigations on the use of neoadjuvant radiation and chemotherapy regimes.

Background: Pharyngeal pH monitoring has recently been used to identify patients with extraesophageal symptoms induced by gastroesophageal reflux. We employed this method of acid detection to evaluate patients with respiratory symptoms prior to and after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication to further elucidate the relationship between GERD and respiratory symptoms., Methods: Twenty-one consecutive patients with extraesophageal symptoms thought to be caused by reflux underwent symptomatic and functional evaluation (esophageal manometry and 24-h pH monitoring with a pharyngeal probe) before and after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Episodes of pharyngeal acid exposure were considered abnormal if the pH dropped below 4, occurred simultaneously with esophageal acidification, and occurred outside meal times., Results: All patients had gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and respiratory symptoms; nine of 15 (60%) had evidence of pharyngeal reflux preoperatively. Antireflux procedures resulted in a significant decrease in pharyngeal reflux (7.9 to 1.6 episodes/24h; p <0.05) and esophageal acid exposure (7.5% to 2.1%; p <0.05). In patients with pharyngeal reflux and complete postoperative testing, three (60%) obtained improvement of respiratory symptoms and resolution of pharyngeal reflux. In two patients with recurrent respiratory symptoms after surgery, persistent pharyngeal reflux was detected., Conclusion: Operative treatment of GERD is effective in controlling extraesophageal reflux, measured subjectively and objectively. Evidence of pharyngeal reflux on pH testing helps to identify which patients with respiratory symptoms will benefit from an antireflux procedure.

Surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is indicated for patients with moderate to severe signs and symptoms or a need for increasing doses of antisecretory drugs. Long segment Barrett's metaplasia is another indication, especially in young patients. Preoperative evaluation differs somewhat depending on whether the patient's symptoms are typical or atypical of GERD. Laparoscopic fundoplication is described. Follow-up of as long as 8 years indicates that more than 90% of patients are satisfied with the results, although 14% are using antisecretory drugs regularly. Recurrent symptoms or dysphagia may indicate surgical failure, and medical therapy, esophageal dilatation, or surgery may be appropriate. Laparoscopic surgery in these patients takes longer than the original procedure but has many benefits if performed by an experienced surgeon.

The only treatment currently available for paraesophageal hernia is surgery, which is effective in most cases if the principles of operative therapy are followed. These principles include reducing the stomach, resecting the hernia sac, effectively closing the hiatus, and achieving sufficient gastropexy. The authors believe that a laparoscopic approach to paraesophageal hernias is safe and effective, allowing excellent visualization of the hiatus and superior esophageal mobilization, with significantly less physiologic insult to the debilitated patients in this population. Two questions remain, hoever. First, is an antireflux procedure necessary? The authors believe it is, because of the high rate of postoperative reflux. Additionally, the procedure does not add significant time to the overall operation and provides an excellent anchoring mechanism. Second, is there a higher rate of recurrence with laparoscopic repair? This concern, introduced by Hashemi et al, has not been raised by other authors. The authors have had few recurrences but currently are studying all of their asymptomatic patients for confirmation. For now, the authors consider laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair with Nissen fundoplication the procedure of choice for this difficult problem.

Hemorrhagic shock appears to predispose patients to subsequent sepsis. This study examined the effect of different resuscitation fluids on macrophage function following hemorrhagic shock. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were bled to a blood pressure of 50 mmHg for 60 min and then resuscitated with 6% hydroxyethyl starch (HES) or Lactated Ringers (LR). Phagocytic function was assessed by clearance of IV colloidal carbon (C). Carbon clearance was not statistically different between control (154.89), shock LR (169.16), and shock HES (144.60). Computerized image analysis of C distribution in sections of liver and spleen taken 4 h after C infusion exhibits a significant decrease in C distribution after resuscitation with HES compared to control and animals resuscitated with LR (Student's t test, p < .05). Male CBA/J mice were bled to a mean blood pressure of 50 mmHg for 60 min and then resuscitated with either LR (N = 18) or HES (N = 17). In separate experiments CBA/J mice had no shock, but were given LR or HES followed by cecal ligation and puncture and later excision (CLPE). A final group had shock with either LR or HES resuscitation and then CLPE as above. Splenocytes were harvested 48 h after shock for mixed lymphocyte culture (MLC). Animals undergoing shock with subsequent septic challenge (Shock/CLPE) showed significantly increased mortality 40 vs. 0% (chi square, p < .05) and immunosuppression on MLC 2,088(LR)/3,300 (HES) vs. 18,570 (LR)/17,705 (HES) compared to CLPE alone (Student's t test, P < .05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)