Search

Supplementary Table from Phase IB Study of GITR Agonist Antibody TRX518 Singly and in Combination with Gemcitabine, Pembrolizumab, or Nivolumab in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors

Purpose:TRX518 is a mAb engaging the glucocorticoid-induced TNF receptor−related protein (GITR). This open-label, phase I study (TRX518-003) evaluated the safety and efficacy of repeated dose TRX518 monotherapy and in combination with gemcitabine, pembrolizumab, or nivolumab in advanced solid tumors.Patients and Methods:TRX518 monotherapy was dose escalated (Part A) and expanded (Part B) up to 4 mg/kg loading, 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks. Parts C–E included dose-escalation (2 and 4 mg/kg loading followed by 1 mg/kg) and dose-expansion (4 mg/kg loading) phases with gemcitabine (Part C), pembrolizumab (Part D), or nivolumab (Part E). Primary endpoints included incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), serious adverse events (SAE), and pharmacokinetics. Secondary endpoints were efficacy and pharmacodynamics.Results:A total of 109 patients received TRX518: 43 (Parts A+B), 30 (Part C), 26 (Part D), and 10 (Part E), respectively. A total of 67% of patients in Parts D+E had received prior anti–PD(L)1 or anti–CTLA-4. No DLTs, treatment-related SAEs, and/or grade 4 or 5 AEs were observed with TRX518 monotherapy. In Parts C–E, no DLTs were observed, although TRX518-related SAEs were reported in 3.3% (Part C) and 10.0% (Part E), respectively. Objective response rate was 3.2%, 3.8%, 4%, and 12.5% in Parts A+B, C, D, and E, respectively. TRX518 affected peripheral and intratumoral regulatory T cells (Treg) with different kinetics depending on the combination regimen. Responses with TRX518 monotherapy+anti–PD1 combination were associated with intratumoral Treg reductions and CD8 increases and activation after treatment.Conclusions:TRX518 showed an acceptable safety profile with pharmacodynamic activity. Repeated dose TRX518 monotherapy and in combination resulted in limited clinical responses associated with immune activation.See related commentary by Hernandez-Guerrero and Moreno, p. 3905

Supplementary Data from Phase IB Study of GITR Agonist Antibody TRX518 Singly and in Combination with Gemcitabine, Pembrolizumab, or Nivolumab in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors

Supplementary Figure from Phase IB Study of GITR Agonist Antibody TRX518 Singly and in Combination with Gemcitabine, Pembrolizumab, or Nivolumab in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors

Purpose: TRX518 is a mAb engaging the glucocorticoid-induced TNF receptor−related protein (GITR). This open-label, phase I study (TRX518-003) evaluated the safety and efficacy of repeated dose TRX518 monotherapy and in combination with gemcitabine, pembrolizumab, or nivolumab in advanced solid tumors. Patients and Methods: TRX518 monotherapy was dose escalated (Part A) and expanded (Part B) up to 4 mg/kg loading, 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks. Parts C–E included dose-escalation (2 and 4 mg/kg loading followed by 1 mg/kg) and dose-expansion (4 mg/kg loading) phases with gemcitabine (Part C), pembrolizumab (Part D), or nivolumab (Part E). Primary endpoints included incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), serious adverse events (SAE), and pharmacokinetics. Secondary endpoints were efficacy and pharmacodynamics. Results: A total of 109 patients received TRX518: 43 (Parts A+B), 30 (Part C), 26 (Part D), and 10 (Part E), respectively. A total of 67% of patients in Parts D+E had received prior anti–PD(L)1 or anti–CTLA-4. No DLTs, treatment-related SAEs, and/or grade 4 or 5 AEs were observed with TRX518 monotherapy. In Parts C–E, no DLTs were observed, although TRX518-related SAEs were reported in 3.3% (Part C) and 10.0% (Part E), respectively. Objective response rate was 3.2%, 3.8%, 4%, and 12.5% in Parts A+B, C, D, and E, respectively. TRX518 affected peripheral and intratumoral regulatory T cells (Treg) with different kinetics depending on the combination regimen. Responses with TRX518 monotherapy+anti–PD1 combination were associated with intratumoral Treg reductions and CD8 increases and activation after treatment. Conclusions: TRX518 showed an acceptable safety profile with pharmacodynamic activity. Repeated dose TRX518 monotherapy and in combination resulted in limited clinical responses associated with immune activation. See related commentary by Hernandez-Guerrero and Moreno, p. 3905

93 Background: Chemotherapy Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN) is a debilitating side effect associated with many chemotherapeutic agents. It significantly impacts quality of life during treatment, causes lasting neuropathy, and may also shorten the treatment regimen, potentially impacting clinical benefit. The pathology of CIPN is still not completely understood, however, increasing evidence suggests sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) may be an important signaling molecule. Altered neuronal sphingolipid metabolism has been linked to neuropathic pain, evidenced by elevated plasma levels of S1P in patients receiving chemotherapy. Methods: BXQ-350 is a nanovesicle of Saposin C, an allosteric activator of sphingolipid metabolism, that lowers systemic S1P. BXQ-350 was investigated in an adult Phase 1 dose-escalation safety study in heavily pretreated all-comer cancer patients with advanced solid malignancies ( NCT02859857 ). The primary objective was to determine the safety profile and potential clinical activity of BXQ-350 as monotherapy. Samples were collected to explore potential biomarkers. Results: BXQ-350 was safe and well tolerated. Clinical signs of activity were observed in 13 patients (~17.8% of evaluable patients) experiencing a clinical benefit (PR, SD) up to cycle 6 and beyond including: 4 CRC, 1 pancreatic, and 1 GIST patient. Two patients are still on study six years after enrollment, including 1 CRC. Interestingly, a pancreatic cancer patient with chronic CIPN at time of enrollment spontaneously reported a significant improvement of her neuropathic symptoms shortly after receiving BXQ-350. Investigation of potential improvements in patients with chronic CIPN at time of enrollment revealed that 4 out of 10 patients experienced an improvement of their symptoms that seemed to be associated with a decrease in S1P systemic levels following BXQ-350 administration. BXQ-350 was subsequently investigated in a murine oxaliplatin-CIPN preclinical model with results showing a dose-dependent prevention/resolution of CIPN correlating with decreasing systemic S1P levels. Conclusions: Results of this Phase 1 study in heavily pretreated patients shows that BXQ-350 was well tolerated and seems to generate a clinical benefit via modulation of S1P. There were preliminary signs that BXQ-350 may alleviate symptoms of CIPN in relation to decreasing S1P concentration. Additional studies are underway to better understand this novel mechanism of action. Clinical trial information: 02859857 .

154 Background: Sphingolipids are a class of bioactive signaling molecules implicated in multiple cellular processes and molecular pathways. Many publications have demonstrated that ceramides are proapoptotic, synergize with cancer treatments, and mitigate chemoresistance. Findings also demonstrated that sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) is a key sphingolipid that promotes cancer cell proliferation, activates multiple oncogenic pathways, and stimulates immuno-suppressor cell populations promoting a pro-tumoral microenvironment. Several studies of colorectal cancer patients have shown high levels of ceramides being associated with improved survival, while high S1P levels are associated with a poor prognosis. Hence, modulation of sphingolipid metabolism continues to be a promising treatment approach. Methods: BXQ-350 is a nanovesicle of Saposin C, an allosteric activator of sphingolipid metabolism, that lowers systemic S1P and increases C18 ceramide. BXQ-350 was investigated in a Phase 1 dose-escalation safety study in an all-comer cancer patients with advanced solid malignancies ( NCT02859857 ) to determine its safety profile and potential clinical activity as monotherapy. Samples were collected to explore potential biomarkers. Results: 13 patients (~17.8% of evaluable patients) had a clinical benefit up to cycle 6 (PR, SD), with the majority experiencing a decrease in systemic S1P levels and an increase in C18 levels. 8 patients (~11% of evaluable patients) had PFS > 6 months, with 2 patients still on study six years after enrollment. Analysis of plasma samples also revealed an increase in anti-tumoral cytokines (IFNg, TNFa, IL-2) and a decrease in pro-tumoral ones (IL-6, 8, 10). Among patients with PFS > 6 months, there were 4 recurrent CRC patients (1PR, 3SD): 1 patient had a PFS of ~12 months, 2 of ~18 months, and 1 is still on study after 6 years. Conclusions: Results of this Phase 1 study in heavily pretreated patients show BXQ-350 was well tolerated and seem to generate a clinical benefit in CRC patients via modulation of S1P and ceramides. A phase 2 trial of BXQ-350 in combination with FOLFOX/Bevacizumab in newly diagnosed mCRC is on-going with plans to further investigate this novel mechanism of action. Clinical trial information: 02859857 .

Purpose: The aim of the study was to determine safety, antitumor activity, and pharmacodynamic profile of mogamulizumab, an anti-CCR4 monoclonal antibody targeting effector regulatory T cells (Treg) in combination with the checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab in patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors. Patients and Methods: This was a multicenter, dose-finding (phase I), and dose expansion (phase II) study (NCT02705105) in patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors. There were no dose-limiting toxicities in phase I with mogamulizumab 1 mg/kg every week for cycle 1 followed by 1 mg/kg every 2 weeks plus nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks intravenously, and cohort expansion occurred at this dose level. Results: All 114 patients treated with mogamulizumab 1 mg/kg plus nivolumab 240 mg in phases I (n = 4) and II (n = 110) were assessed for safety and efficacy. Mogamulizumab plus nivolumab showed acceptable safety and tolerability. Objective response rate was 10.5% [95% confidence interval (CI), 5.6–17.7; 3 complete and 9 partial responses]. Disease control rate was 36.8%. Median duration of response was 14.4 months. Median progression-free survival was 2.6 (95% CI, 2.3–3.1) months, and median overall survival was 9.5 (95% CI, 5.9–13.5) months. Conclusions: Combination of mogamulizumab with nivolumab for treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors did not result in enhanced efficacy. Tolerability of mogamulizumab 1 mg/kg plus nivolumab 240 mg was acceptable.

BackgroundThe indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) pathway is a key counter-regulatory mechanism that, in cancer, is exploited by tumors to evade antitumor immunity. Indoximod is a small-molecule IDO pathway inhibitor that reverses the immunosuppressive effects of low tryptophan (Trp) and high kynurenine (Kyn) that result from IDO activity. In this study, indoximod was used in combination with a checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) pembrolizumab for the treatment for advanced melanoma.MethodsPatients with advanced melanoma were enrolled in a single-arm phase II clinical trial evaluating the addition of indoximod to standard of care CPI approved for melanoma. Investigators administered their choice of CPI including pembrolizumab (P), nivolumab (N), or ipilimumab (I). Indoximod was administered continuously (1200 mg orally two times per day), with concurrent CPI dosed per US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved label.ResultsBetween July 2014 and July 2017, 131 patients were enrolled. (P) was used more frequently (n=114, 87%) per investigator’s choice. The efficacy evaluable population consisted of 89 patients from the phase II cohort with non-ocular melanoma who received indoximod combined with (P).The objective response rate (ORR) for the evaluable population was 51% with confirmed complete response of 20% and disease control rate of 70%. Median progression-free survival was 12.4 months (95% CI 6.4 to 24.9). The ORR for Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive patients was 70% compared with 46% for PD-L1-negative patients. The combination was well tolerated, and side effects were similar to what was expected from single agent (P).ConclusionIn this study, the combination of indoximod and (P) was well tolerated and showed antitumor efficacy that is worth further evaluation in selected patients with advanced melanoma.

Background: Maveropepimut-S (MVP-S) is a novel immunotherapeutic that educates a specific CD8 T cell response to the cancer antigen, survivin, to orchestrate immune-mediated elimination of survivin-expressing cancer cells. Specifically, MVP-S is a lipid-in-oil formulation of the DPX delivery platform, incorporating five survivin-specific immunogenic peptides, the innate immune stimulant, polydIdC, and a CD4 T cell helper peptide. In prior clinical studies, MVP-S and intermittent low-dose cyclophosphamide (CPA) elicited confirmed clinical responses (both partial and complete by RECISTv1.1) and induced a robust, durable survivin-specific CD8 T cell response. Moreover, the combination with pembrolizumab appeared to be well tolerated in solid tumors and lymphomas. The purpose of this phase 2 study is to explore whether this combination may be safe and effective in advanced, metastatic bladder cancer patients, both naïve to, and previously treated with, immune checkpoint inhibitors. Results: Seventeen (17) subjects were treated with the combination of MVP-S, CPA and pembrolizumab. Subjects received an average of 3 prior lines of therapy with 13/17 (76.4%) having previously received an anti-PD1/L1. Seven subjects progressed on or after anti-PD1/L1 as last line of therapy prior to entering the trial. The combination was well-tolerated, with majority of AEs being grade 1 or grade 2. Five (5) out of 17 subjects showed response: 3 subjects with PR (unconfirmed) and 2 with CR (confirmed). Three of these, including the 2 CRs, had progressed on anti-PD-1/L1. Long-term clinical benefit has been observed in several subjects (one patient is still on treatment after 17 months) and coincides with an increase in detectable survivin-specific T cells in peripheral blood. Conclusion: Preliminary data suggest that MVP-S/CPA and pembrolizumab is a well-tolerated combination and shows encouraging preliminary clinical activity in the treatment of advanced or metastatic bladder cancer patients, including patients who have progressed on prior anti-PD-1/L1 therapy. Citation Format: Olivier Rixe, Vincent Castonguay, Henry Conter, Eva Chalas, Pratibha Desai, Christian Squillante, Lisa A. MacDonald, Rebekah Conlon, Yogesh Bramhecha, Heather Hirsch, Jeremy R. Graff, Stephan Fiset. Safety, preliminary efficacy and pharmacodynamic (PD) analysis of maveropepimut-S, intermittent low-dose cyclophosphamide and pembrolizumab in patients with advanced, metastatic bladder cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT035.

e15045 Background: Chemical Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN) is a debilitating and serious side-effect associated with many chemotherapeutic treatments. Often, CIPN is a dose-limiting toxicity, and its effects can be long-lasting in some patients. The pathology of CIPN is thought to involve not only cytotoxicity of neuronal cells, but also inflammation and immune responses. Hence, it is not surprising that the sphingolipid sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) is thought to be a key contributor to CIPN. Methods: BXQ-350, a nanovesicle comprised of recombinantly expressed Saposin C and dioleoylphosphatidylserine, has broad anticancer activity. It modulates sphingolipid metabolism and signaling, lowers S1P and increases pro-apoptotic ceramides, and induces an anti-tumoral immune response. BXQ-350 was investigated in a Phase 1 dose-escalation safety study of all-comer cancer patients with advanced solid malignancies, including high grade gliomas ( NCT02859857 )*. Multiple secondary parameters were included to characterize BXQ-350’s pharmacokinetics, efficacy profile and to elucidate potential biomarkers. Results: Interestingly, several patients with established CIPN spontaneously reported improvement of their neuropathy-related symptoms following BXQ-350 administration. Plasma samples from those patients revealed changes in circulating levels of sphingolipids and cytokines, including reduction of circulating levels of S1P and of IL-6, IL-8, cytokines, following BXQ-350 dosing. These properties of BXQ-350 were subsequently investigated in a murine oxaliplatin-CIPN preclinical model; results showed a dose-dependent prevention/resolution of CIPN, which also correlated with decreasing systemic S1P levels. Additional plasma based CIPN specific biomarkers were investigated, and preclinical results suggest that BXQ-350 may also favorably inhibit specific immune cells that favor CPIN. Conclusions: These preclinical and clinical observations related to CIPN, coupled with the fact that BXQ-350 acts synergistically with many chemotherapies and radiation, warrant further its investigation into preventing or improving CIPN related symptoms in cancer patients. Clinical trial information: 02859857.

e15007 Background: BXQ-350 was investigated in a Phase 1 dose-escalation safety study of all-comer cancer patients with advanced solid malignancies, including high grade gliomas ( NCT02859857 ) (safety/efficacy results reported in a separate abstract). The primary objective of this single agent study was to describe the safety profile and to determine the maximum tolerated dose. Multiple secondary parameters were included to characterize BXQ-350’s pharmacokinetic parameters, efficacy profile and elucidation of potential biomarkers. BXQ-350 is a nanovesicle of recombinantly expressed Saposin C (SapC) and dioleoylphosphatidylserine. In nature, SapC is a protein encoded by the Psap gene, and serves as an allosteric activator of several enzymes involved in sphingolipid/ceramide metabolism, enzymes which are being investigated as novel therapeutic targets in cancers. Indeed, sphingolipids are a class of bioactive signaling molecules implicated in multiple cellular processes and molecular pathways. Amongst these sphingolipids, Sphingosine-1-Phosphate (S1P) induces cancer cell survival and proliferation, activates multiple oncogenic pathways, and promotes a pro-tumoral microenvironment. SapC has broad anticancer activity, lowering S1P and increasing ceramides, also inducing an anti-tumoral immune response. Methods: Lipodomic analysis (sphingolipids) and cytokines were analyzed in plasma samples of a subset of patients enrolled in this study. Results: Analysis of plasma biomarker samples, collected throughout the period patients were on study, reveals notable changes of circulating sphingolipids and cytokines. A subset of patients exhibited clinical benefits following BXQ-350 administration (see other presentation for details; ̃17% of the evaluable patients remained on study up to Cycle 6; and 8 patients (̃11%) with PFS> 6 months). Concomitant circulating changes in S1P and other ceramides may be indicative of treatment effect. Also, concurrent changes in circulating levels of pro/antitumoral cytokines were noted. Conclusions: While these results are exploratory and preliminary in nature, these initial results warrant further investigation. These observations will be further explored in specific cancer and non-cancer indications. Clinical trial information: 02859857.

e15059 Background: Bexion recently completed an all-comer Phase 1 clinical study of BXQ-350 in patients with advanced solid tumors including high grade gliomas to evaluate the safety profile and to determine the maximum tolerated- or biologically effective dose. BXQ-350 is a nanovesicle comprised of recombinantly expressed Saposin C (SapC) and dioleoylphosphatidylserine. SapC, a human protein encoded by the Psap gene, is an allosteric activator of several enzymes involved sphingolipid metabolism. Sphingolipids are bioactive signaling molecules implicated in multiple cellular processes including apoptosis and immune stimulation/inhibition. In nonclinical studies, BXQ-350 evidences broad anticancer activity, selectively inducing apoptosis of cancer cells by modulating sphingolipids (ceramides/S1P), and BXQ-350 acts synergistically with multiple classes of anticancer agents and treatments. Methods: In the trial (NTC02859857), performed at four US sites, BXQ-350 was administered intravenously for a minimum of 6 cycles over 28 weeks at escalating doses from 0.7 mg/kg up to 2.4 mg/kg. Multiple secondary parameters were included to characterize its pharmacokinetics, efficacy profile and identify potential biomarkers. Results: Results indicate that: i) BXQ-350 was safe and well-tolerated as no DLT was observed and an MTD was not reached; ii) treatment related adverse events leading to discontinuation were typical for this patient population and disease related; iii)* biomarker analyses suggest positive modulation of sphingolipid metabolism and stimulation of the immune system; iv)* surprisingly, some patients noted improvement of existing peripheral neuropathies. RANO or RECIST ver 1.1 criteria were used to evaluate tumor response: 13 patients reached Cycle 6 restaging (17% ORR); 8 patients (11.0% of evaluable patients) demonstrated progression free survival over more than 6 months; and 2 patients (a GBM and CRC patient) are still on study after 5 years. * subject of separate abstracts. Conclusions: In conclusion, BXQ-350 is a first-in-human and first-in-class novel biologic whose Phase 1 results suggest that it may have clinical utility either as a monotherapy or when combined with other targeted agents. Clinical trial information: 028559857.

The significance of a dysregulated sphingolipid metabolism in cancer, including brain tumors, has been demonstrated and several enzymes involved in sphingolipid metabolism are being investigated as novel therapeutic targets for adult and pediatric brain cancers. Saposin C (Sphingolipid Activator PrO[S]etIN) is a human protein encoded by the Psap gene and is an allosteric activator of several enzymes involved in sphingolipid/ceramide metabolism. BXQ-350 is a nanovesicle of Saposin C that has broad anticancer activity, selectively inducing apoptosis of cancer cells by lowering Sphingosine-1-Phosphate and increasing ceramides concentrations and inducing an anti-tumoral immune response. BXQ-350 was investigated in a Phase 1 dose-escalation safety study in cancer patients with advanced solid malignancies including brain tumors (NCT02859857). The primary objective of this single agent study was to describe the safety profile and to determine the maximum tolerated dose, or the biological effective dose, of BXQ-350 administered intravenously at escalating doses from 0.7 mg/kg up to 2.4 mg/kg. Multiple secondary parameters were included to characterize BXQ-350’s pharmacokinetic parameters, efficacy profile and potential biomarkers. This trial was performed at four US sites. Results indicate that BXQ-350 was safe and well-tolerated as no DLT was observed and an MTD was not reached. RANO or RECIST 1.1 criteria were used to evaluate tumor response. Analysis of plasma samples suggests that BXQ-350 modulates sphingolipid metabolism and impacts the immune system positively. Furthermore, potential signs of single agent activity were observed across tumor types, including in two ependymomas for which results will be presented.

3028 Background: OBT076, an Antibody Drug Conjugate (ADC) consisting of a fully human IgG1 antibody conjugated via a cleavable linker to the derivative microtubule inhibitor DM4. It has specificity for the CD205/Ly75 target antigen which is an endocytic receptor overexpressed on the cell surface and immunosuppressive dendritic cells. This phase 1 study evaluates safety, tolerability, PK/PD and preliminary efficacy of OBT076 in solid tumor patients with high expression of target protein CD205 (CAP-CLIA validated centralized IHC test). Methods: Open label, two parts trial in patients with metastatic CD205+ve solid tumors who progressed on standard therapy. Part 1 of the study consisted in dose escalation from 1.6 mg/kg to 3.5 mg/kg. An mTPI design is used to guide to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) Treatment was given on day 1 every 3 weeks followed by GCSF on day 8. Blood samples and flow cytometry were used to assess PK/PD. Tumor response was assessed every three cycles. Part 2 of trial is an expansion basket trial enriched in indications where preliminary efficacy has been shown. Results: The study completed Part 1 dose escalation. Part 2 expansion phase is ongoing. Between Dec 2019 and January 2022, 20 patients were enrolled (18 patients in the dose escalation and 2 in the ongoing expansion). The median age 61, 9 patients were males and 9 had ECOG PS 0. All patients had at least one metastatic site and 90% received at least 2 lines of chemotherapy in the metastatic setting. Recommended dose for the expansion phase is 3.0 mg/kg. No other significant side effects have been observed. PK data showed that Cmax of 40.000-90.000 ng/ml was achieved between 2.5 and 3.5mg/kg dose and is comparable to the therapeutic dose in mouse models. In part 1 of the study, 7 patients derived clinical benefit despite being in disease progression at trial entry. One patient with gastric cancer with linitis plastica experienced major improvement with complete disappearance of ascites and metastatic adenopathy after cycle 3. The six other patients had lasting stable disease and received between 5-14+ cycles with median of 5 cycles. Two patients with low PD-L-1 expression received checkpoint inhibitor treatment with pembrolizumab after 2 and 5 cycles of OBT076, both patients experienced near complete response after only one to two cycles. Conclusions: OBT076 at 3.0mg/kg has shown favorable safety profile with manageable neutropenia. The preliminary efficacy has shown preliminary antitumoral single agent activity in gastric, ovarian and lung cancer. The two patients who received a sequential administration of pembrolizumab after OBT076 showed major tumor activity. Sequential administration of OBT076 followed by a PD-1 inhibitor was also supported by PD markers and warrants further evaluation. Clinical trial information: NCT04064359. [Table: see text]

Background PF-06840003 is a highly selective indoleamine 2, 3-dioxygenase (IDO1) inhibitor with antitumor effects in preclinical models. This first-in-human phase 1 study evaluated safety, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, and preliminary efficacy in recurrent malignant glioma to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Methods Patients (N = 17) received oral PF-06840003 in four dose-escalation groups: 125 mg once-daily (QD; n = 2); 250 mg QD (n = 4); 250 mg twice-daily (BID; n = 3); 500 mg BID (n = 8). A modified toxicity probability interval method determined the MTD. Results Four patients experienced serious adverse events (SAEs); one with treatment-related SAEs (grade 4 alanine and aspartate aminotransferase elevations). The dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) rate at 500 mg BID was 12.5% (n = 1/8); the MTD was not reached. Following PF-06840003 dosing, median time to maximum plasma concentration for the active enantiomer PF-06840002 was 1.5–3.0 hr and mean elimination half-life was 2 to 4 hr (Cycle 1 Day 1). Urinary recovery of PF-06840002 was low (

Fedratinib, an oral selective kinase inhibitor with activity against both wild type and mutationally activated Janus kinase 2, has been approved for the treatment of adult patients with intermediate-2 or high-risk myelofibrosis by the US Food and Drug Administration. In vitro studies indicated that fedratinib was an inhibitor of several cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of repeated doses of fedratinib on the activity of CYP2D6, CYP2C19, and CYP3A4 in patients with solid tumors using a CYP probe cocktail. An open-label, one-sequence, two-period, two-treatment crossover study was conducted. Patients were administered a single oral dose cocktail of metoprolol (100 mg), omeprazole (20 mg), and midazolam (2 mg) used as probe substrates for CYP2D6, CYP2C19, and CYP3A4 enzyme activities, respectively, without fedratinib on Day -1 or with fedratinib on Day 15. Coadministration of 500 mg once-daily doses of fedratinib for 15 days increased the mean area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time zero to infinity following a single-dose cocktail containing metoprolol (CYP2D6 substrate), omeprazole (CYP2C19 substrate), and midazolam (CYP3A4 substrate) by 1.77-fold (90% confidence interval [CI] 1.27–2.47) for metoprolol, 2.82-fold (90% CI 2.26–3.53) for omeprazole, and 3.84-fold (90% CI 2.62–5.63) for midazolam, respectively. The mean plasma Day 14/Day 1 ratio of 4β-hydroxycholesterol, an endogenous biomarker of CYP3A4 activity, was 0.59 (90% CI 0.54-0.66), suggesting a net inhibition of CYP3A4 by fedratinib. Fedratinib is a weak inhibitor of CYP2D6, and a moderate inhibitor of CYP2C19 and CYP3A4. These results serve as the basis for dose modifications of these CYP substrate drugs when co-administered with fedratinib.

Alpha-emitters are radionuclides that decay through the emission of high linear energy transfer α-particles and possess favorable pharmacologic profiles for cancer treatment. When coupled with monoclonal antibodies, peptides, small molecules, or nanoparticles, the excellent cytotoxic capability of α-particle emissions has generated a strong interest in exploring targeted α-therapy in the pre-clinical setting and more recently in clinical trials in oncology. Multiple obstacles have been overcome by researchers and clinicians to accelerate the development of targeted α-therapies, especially with the recent improvement in isotope production and purification, but also with the development of innovative strategies for optimized targeting. Numerous studies have demonstrated the in vitro and in vivo efficacy of the targeted α-therapy. Radium-223 (223Ra) dichloride (Xofigo®) is the first α-emitter to have received FDA approval for the treatment of prostate cancer with metastatic bone lesions. There is a significant increase in the number of clinical trials in oncology using several radionuclides such as Actinium-225 (225Ac), Bismuth-213 (213Bi), Lead-212 (212Pb), Astatine (211At) or Radium-223 (223Ra) assessing their safety and preliminary activity. This review will cover their therapeutic application as well as summarize the investigations that provide the foundation for further clinical development.

BACKGROUND Optimal management of progressive high-grade gliomas (HGG) is not fully defined and outcomes are poor. Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) is an enzyme which converts tryptophan to kynurenines, which contribute to the immunosuppresive tumor microenvironment (TME). Targeting the TME by inhibiting IDO1 is a strategy for potential improvement in survival in HGG. METHODS A phase 1/2 trial using the IDO1 inhibitor indoximod was conducted in progressive grade 3 and 4 gliomas. The phase 1 cmponent used a 3 + 3 design escalating indoximod from 600mg po BID to 1200mg po BID in conjunction with temozolomide (150 mg/m2, 5/28 days). The phase 2 component consisted of 3 cohorts: A) indoximod+temozolomide B) indoximod+temozolomide+bevacizumab (patients already on bevacizumab) C) indoximod+temozolomide+stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Patients were treated until progression or toxicity. RESULTS 33.3% of patients developed indoximod TEAEs. There were no dose limiting toxicities in the phase 1 component (n=12). 1200 mg BID was established as the phase 2 dose of indoximod. In the phase 2 component (n=148) PFS6 was 74% (A), 93% (B), 70% (C). Median OS was 289 days [10.3 months](A), 159 days [5.7 months](B), 285 days [10.2 months](C). Correlative study results will be available for meeting presentation. CONCLUSIONS The IDO1 inhibitor indoximod proved safe and tolerable in conjunction with temozolomide, bevacizumab, and SRS in patients with progressive HGG. There was a trend toward better survival outcomes when indoximod was combined with temozolomide alone or temozolomide+SRS.

The clinical development of cancer drugs is rapidly moving from empirical "one drug fits all" or development-by-tumor-type approaches towards more personalized treatment models. A deeper understanding of cancer and the immune system, novel technologies, and powerful analytics have fueled an increase in precision oncology approaches integrating the molecular profiles of the tumor with the clinical profile of the patient. While this approach has been successful for targeted therapies, the complex mode of action of immunotherapies will likely require integration of clinical profiling with more comprehensive profiling of the tumor, of the tumor microenvironment, and of the immune system of the patient. Integration of precision oncology into clinical research for immunotherapies is viewed as a means to better select patients in the early clinical phase of drug development to (1) maximize the benefit-to-risk ratio for the patient, (2) generate early proof of concept and proof of relevance for the investigational drug, and (3) inform on how to best combine or sequence the therapeutic with other drugs. Here we discuss the upsides and challenges of incorporating precision immuno-oncology into early-phase clinical trials.

Background: RGX-104 is a small-molecule LXR agonist that modulates innate immunity via transcriptional activation of the ApoE gene. Binding of ApoE to its receptor LRP8 robustly inhibits angiogenesis and depletes myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSC), thereby activating cytotoxic T-lymphocytes. MDSCs are associated with resistance to both checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) and chemotherapy, providing a rationale for combination therapy with RGX-104. We previously reported results of the RGX-104 monotherapy dose escalation for which 26 patients with refractory solid tumors were treated in 5 dose cohorts. On-target AEs included hyperlipidemia and neutropenia. Flow-cytometry demonstrated MDSC depletion with associated T cell activation, which correlated with clinical benefit. A 40% disease control rate (DCR; SD+PR) was observed with a confirmed partial response (PR) by irRC (>79% reduction in index lesions) in a patient with platinum-refractory small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Methods: Here, we present the safety, biomarker and efficacy results of the docetaxel combination arm of the RGX-104 trial. Cohort 1- RGX-104 80 mg BID, and docetaxel at 35 mg/m2 days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle; Cohort 2- RGX-104 80 mg BID, 5 days-on/2 days-off (5/2), and docetaxel at 28 mg/m2 on above schedule. Cohort 3- RGX-104 100 mg BID (5/2), and docetaxel as per cohort 2. Results: As of February 7, 2020, 11 patients with refractory solid tumors have been treated in 3 dose escalation cohorts with RGX-104 plus docetaxel. AEs were consistent with the individual toxicity profiles of docetaxel and RGX-104, with neutropenia being the most common AE and dose-limiting in cohort 1. The 5/2 dosing regimen in cohorts 2 and 3 resulted in significantly fewer episodes of neutropenia and no DLTs, while maintaining pharmacodynamic effects including >50% sustained MDSC depletion. A 66% DCR was observed in 9 evaluable patients including 2 patients in cohort 2 with PRs, a CPI-refractory SCCHN patient and a CPI-refractory melanoma patient, who remains on treatment at 36 weeks. A patient with melanoma in Cohort 3 had an initial assessment of SD and continues on study at 14 weeks. Clinical responses were associated with increases in T cell activation markers exceeding that generally observed with RGX-104 alone (up to a 5-fold increase in total CD8 T cells, a 7-fold increase in LAG-3+ CD8 T cells, and a 75-fold induction of serum IFNγ). Conclusion: The safety profile and marked pharmacodynamic and clinical activity of the RGX-104/docetaxel combination in CPI-refractory patients supports further development of this regimen. Consequently, the RGX-104/docetaxel regimen will be evaluated in a Phase 1b/2 expansion cohort in patients with relapsed/refractory ES-SCLC/high grade-neuroendocrine tumors. Citation Format: Emerson Lim, Erika P. Hamilton, Rebecca Redman, Michael A. Postow, Russell J. Schilder, Monica M. Mita, Alain C. Mita, Bartosz Chmielowski, James Strauss, Angela Jain, Shubham Pant, Olivier Rixe, Tomislav Dragovich, R. Donald Harvey, Igor Puzanov, Kevin B. Kim, Eric K. Rowinsky, Michael Szarek, Foster Gonsalves, Isabel Kurth, Celia Andreu, Robert W. Busby, David Darst, Masoud Tavazoie, Syed Raza, Narayan Lebaka16, Robert Wasserman, Gerald Falchook. RGX-104, a first-in-class immunotherapy targeting the liver-X receptor (LXR): Initial results from the phase 1b RGX-104 plus docetaxel combination dose escalation cohorts [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr CT146.

CD40 is a co-stimulatory receptor of the TNF receptor superfamily expressed on antigen presenting cells (APCs). Antibodies targeting CD40 may have therapeutic benefit via multiple mechanisms including innate immune activation that can support generation of antigen-specific, antitumor T cell responses, and binding to CD40-expressing cancer cells leading to antibody-mediated target cell killing. Multiple CD40-directed antibodies are in clinical development and differ by immunoglobulin isotype, affinity to CD40, and selectivity for FcγR-binding. These alterations could lead to differences in pharmacodynamic and antitumor activity. SEA-CD40 is an agonistic non-fucosylated, humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody directed against CD40. SEA-CD40 has enhanced FcγRIIIa binding (~10x greater than parent IgG1 antibody) that drives increased effector function, resulting in more potent immune stimulatory activity than antibodies with muted or selective FcγR binding. The enhanced effector function of SEA-CD40 may confer greater immune stimulation and antitumor activity relative to other CD40-directed therapeutics. Preclinically, SEA-CD40 exposure results in a distinct signature of responses including activation of APCs, CD8+ and CD4+ T cells and NK cells, and targeted depletion of CD40+ B cells. SEA-CD40 demonstrates superior activity compared to other CD40-targeted antibodies in vitro and in vivo, suggesting that the enhanced effector function is critical for optimal immune cell agonism. For example, SEA-CD40 drove in vitro ADCC activity 100-fold above the parent antibody and exhibited robust ADCC with the low and high affinity FcγRIIIA genotype. At matched dose levels in cynomolgus monkeys, SEA-CD40 induced circulating cytokines and sustained B cell depletion that were up to 50-fold above that induced with the parent antibody. The SEA-CD40 signature of activation translates to increased antitumor activity as a single agent and in combination with standard of care treatments in preclinical models, suggesting the potential for beneficial combination therapy in the clinic. The SEA-CD40 immune signature was confirmed by pharmacodynamic changes in an ongoing phase 1 clinical trial in patients with relapsed/refractory metastatic solid tumors (NCT02376699). SEA-CD40 treatment induced dose-dependent increases in circulating cytokines and chemokines associated with myeloid and lymphoid immune activation and trafficking. SEA-CD40 treatment also resulted in activation of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and CD40-targeted B cell depletion in the periphery. These findings support continued clinical evaluation of SEA-CD40. The ongoing phase 1 clinical trial is actively enrolling and includes a cohort in pancreatic cancer assessing the combination of SEA-CD40, gemcitabine, nab-paclitaxel, and pembrolizumab. Citation Format: Haley Neff-LaFord, Juneko E. Grilley-Olson, David C. Smith, Brendan Curti, Sanjay Goel, Timothy M. Kuzel, Svetomir N. Markovic, Olivier Rixe, David L. Bajor, Thomas F. Gajewski, Martin Gutierrez, Elisabeth I. Heath, John Thompson, Sahar Ansari, Shyra Gardai, Celine Jacquemont, Michael Schmitt, Andrew L. Coveler. SEA-CD40 is a non-fucosylated anti-CD40 antibody with potent pharmacodynamic activity in preclinical models and patients with advanced solid tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 5535.

3505 Background: BXQ-350 is a first-in-class agent comprised of Saposin C (SapC) and dioleoyl phosphatidylserine (DOPS). SapC, a multifunctional lysosomal-activator glycoprotein that preferentially interacts with tumor cell phospholipids, has demonstrated anti-tumor effects in both in vitro and in vivo preclinical models. The tolerability and preliminary efficacy of BXQ-350 in the first-in-human study are summarized here. Methods: Eighty-six refractory solid tumor (ST) or high-grade glioma (HGG) patients age ≥18 (36F:50M, age 24-81) were enrolled in a 3-part first-in-human trial (NCT02859857) from 2016-2019 and received at least one dose of BXQ-350. Doses were administered via intravenous infusion during 28-day cycles until disease progression occurred. The previously reported part 1 dose escalation portion of the study (9 HGG, 9 ST patients) established the highest planned dose of 2.4mg/kg as safe but did not identify a maximum tolerated dose. The part 2 expansion cohort treated 37 patients (18 HGG and 19 ST) and an additional part 3 cohort treated 31 ST gastrointestinal (GI) patients, both at the 2.4 mg/kg dose level. Preliminary antitumor activity was evaluated (RECISTv1.1 or RANO). Results: There were no BXQ-350-related serious adverse events, dose limiting toxicities or withdrawals with the exception of 1 allergic type reaction. Three patients (Glioblastoma, Ependymoma, Appendiceal) demonstrated a partial response per RECIST/RANO. Two HGG patients with progressive radiologic enhancement were seen to have treatment effect at surgery, and hence considered to have stable disease. Seven patients (2 HGG, 3 GI, 2 other ST) remain on study and have received treatment for 9+ to 41+ months, with 5 patients treated for > 1 year. A continuing treatment protocol is planned in order to allow these patients to remain on BXQ-350 treatment. Conclusions: BXQ-350 was well tolerated with no significant dose-limiting toxicities at the highest planed dose level. Preliminary results indicate this novel agent demonstrated possible anti-tumor activity in refractory solid tumors and HGG. Clinical trial information: NCT03967093) .

BACKGROUND: Ependymomas are rare primary nervous system tumors accounting for about 3% of adult brain tumors in the United States. The current standard of care includes surgical resection and radiation therapy, with more than half experiencing relapse and poor outcomes. Saposin C and dioleylphosphatidylserine (SapC-DOPS) nanovesicles are a novel investigational treatment agent that can cross the blood-brain barrier and selectively target externalized phosphatidylserine that is expressed on tumor cell surfaces. METHODS: We examined a rare complex ependymoma case enrolled in the ongoing Phase 1b study of SapC-DOPS cancer-targeting agent BXQ-350 (NCT02859857). The patient received cycle 1 (BXQ-350 2.4 mg/kg IV infusion at Day 1–5, 8, 10, 12, 15, 22) and 3 additional cycles (1x28 days), and was followed until death for safety, response, RANO, and ECOG. RESULTS: A 67-year old white male with recurrent Grade III anaplastic ependymoma diagnosed 3 years before enrollment and with a history of surgical intervention exhibited measurable extra-axial (6.4x3.2 cm) and inferolateral intracranial components on MRI, accompanied by palpable skull mass. At baseline, the lesion was 6.4 x 3.2 cm with stable disease per RANO and ECOG of 1. After 2 cycles, minor decrease in size of intracranial enhancing components was reported (overall stable disease per RANO). The patient received 4 total cycles of BQX-350 without related adverse events or toxicities, and cycle 5 was withheld due to volume progression on MRI. He died 6 months post-enrollment. Post-mortem histology and gross anatomy showed extensive tumor necrosis with chondroid differentiation and gross signs of metastatic disease in the lungs, thoracic, and lumbar spine on microscopy. CONCLUSIONS: While further study of cancer-targeting SapC-DOPS nanovesicle efficacy in adult patients with ependymoma is needed, good tolerability in rare aggressive tumors was observed. The role of extensive necrosis and possibly treatment-related intracranial mass reduction supports additional investigations in this indication.

BACKGROUND: Saposin C-dioleylphosphatidylserine (SapC-DOPS) is a novel blood-brain barrier penetrant nanoliposomal agent that targets externalized phosphatidylserine overexpressed on tumor cell membranes. A recent Phase 1a BXQ-350 trial (NCT02859857) reported SapC-DOPS was well tolerated in both solid tumor and high-grade glioma (HGG) patients with potential for treating clinically challenging gliomas, including their diffuse infiltrative components. METHODS: We evaluated the HGG subset of the ongoing Phase 1 study of IV BXQ-350 administered on Days 1–5, 8, 10, 12, 15, 22 (cycle 1) and each 28 day cycles thereafter. MRI neuroimaging (e.g. Axial T1-post-contrast Ax SE T1 POST-FC and medically necessary views) at Days 29, 57, 113, and 171 (or withdrawal) were completed. RANO assessment, functional neurological deficits, ECOG Performance Status, and safety were assessed. RESULTS: The HGG patients (9/17) were dosed at 0.7 (N = 1), 1.1 (N = 1), 1.4 (N = 2), 1.8 (N = 2), or 2.4 (N = 3) mg/kg, with 8/9 completing a full cycle before withdrawal (7 due to progression, 1 voluntary withdrawal). BXQ-350 was not linked to dose limiting toxicities or severe adverse reactions. Functional neurological deficits and ECOG decline were proportional to radiological progression, with ECOG scores declining from a baseline 0–1 in 2/9 (22%) to 3. One patient completing 6 cycles (>12 months) of BXQ-350 therapy (0.7 mg/kg) exhibited stable disease, -7% lesion size, and no significant progressive functional neurological deficits. Three patients underwent surgery for progression while on treatment. CONCLUSIONS: BXQ-350 was well tolerated by GBM patients with promising best response apparent in neuroimaging, suggesting therapeutic benefit warranting further trials. Updates from the ongoing trial will be presented.

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text., Taxane–gemcitabine combinations have demonstrated antitumor activity. This phase I study (NCT01001221) aimed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of cabazitaxel plus gemcitabine and to assess the preliminary efficacy of this combination. The patients included had metastatic or unresectable solid tumors and had exhausted standard treatment. Cohorts of three to six patients received cabazitaxel (15–20 mg/m2) before (part 1a) or after (part 1b) gemcitabine (700–1000 mg/m2) on Day 1 and gemcitabine alone on Day 8. Prophylactic growth factors were not allowed in cycle 1. In part 1a (n=12), five patients received 20 mg/m2 cabazitaxel plus 1000 mg/m2 gemcitabine (20/1000), five received 15/900, two received 15/700. In part 1b, all six patients received the lowest dose (700/15). At all doses, two or more patients experienced a DLT, regardless of administration sequence, including febrile neutropenia (n=4), grade 4 neutropenia (n=2), grade 4 thrombocytopenia (n=2), and grade 3 aspartate transaminase increase (n=1). The MTD was not established as all cohorts exceeded the MTD by definition. All patients experienced an adverse event; the most frequent all-grade nonhematologic events were fatigue (66.7%), decreased appetite (50.0%), and diarrhea (44.4%). The most frequent grade 3–4 hematologic abnormalities were neutropenia (83.3%), leukopenia (77.8%), and lymphopenia (72.2%). Toxicity was sequence-independent but appeared worse with gemcitabine followed by cabazitaxel. Durable partial responses were observed in three patients (prostate cancer, appendiceal cancer, and melanoma). The unacceptable DLTs with cabazitaxel plus gemcitabine, at doses reduced more than 25% from single-agent doses, preclude further investigation.

Introduction: Based on extensive preclinical data and abundant evidence for clinical activity, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) inhibitors are currently standard of care for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Axitinib is one of the most selective molecules in the class of anti-angiogenic agents, which confers an optimal profile between its safety and anti-cancer activity spectrum.Area covered: In this review, the authors discuss the different stages that lead to the approval of axitinib in the clinic as well as the current perspectives for its clinical use with other promising therapies in mRCC such as immune checkpoint inhibitors and vaccines.Expert opinion: In 2015, axitinib has emerged as one of the major agents used in mRCC. Based on robust preclinical data, this highly specific VEGFR inhibitor continues to be evaluated in different indications, including the adjuvant setting but also sequential administration with other molecularly targeted agents or combinations with immune t...

Cabazitaxel is primarily metabolized by CYP3A. This study evaluated the impact of moderate/strong CYP3A inhibitors [aprepitant (Study Part 2); ketoconazole (Study Part 3)] or strong CYP3A inducers [rifampin (Study Part 4)] on the pharmacokinetics of cabazitaxel.Adult patients received IV cabazitaxel/cisplatin 15/75 mg/m(2) on Day 1 of 3-week cycles (5/75 mg/m(2) in Cycles 1 and 2 of Part 3 to allow a safety margin to the cabazitaxel MTD). Patients received repeated oral doses of aprepitant, ketoconazole or rifampin before/during Cycle 2. Cabazitaxel clearance was the primary endpoint; clearance and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) were normalized to body surface area and dose, respectively.The PK population included 13 (Part 2), 23 (Part 3) and 21 patients (Part 4). Repeated aprepitant administration did not affect cabazitaxel clearance [geometric mean ratio (GMR) 0.98; 90 % confidence interval (CI) 0.80-1.19]. Repeated ketoconazole administration resulted in 20 % decrease in cabazitaxel clearance (GMR 0.80; 90 % CI 0.55-1.15), associated with 25 % increase in AUC (GMR 1.25; 90 % CI 0.86-1.81). Repeated rifampin administration resulted in 21 % increase in cabazitaxel clearance (GMR 1.21; 90 % CI 0.95-1.53), associated with 17 % decrease in AUC (GMR 0.83; 90 % CI 0.65-1.05). The GMR of AUC0-24 with rifampin administration was 1.09 (90 % CI 0.9-1.33), suggesting that rifampin had a low impact during the initial phases of cabazitaxel elimination. Safety findings were consistent with previous results.Cabazitaxel pharmacokinetics are modified by drugs strongly affecting CYP3A. Co-administration of cabazitaxel with strong CYP3A inhibitors or inducers should be avoided.

Next generation sequencing has become a powerful tool in dissecting and identifying mutations and genomic structural variants that accompany tumourigenesis. Sequence analysis of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) illustrates the ability to rapidly identify mutations that may affect phenotype. Approximately 50% of human GBMs overexpress epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) which renders the EGFR protein a compelling therapeutic target. In brain tumours, attempts to target EGFR as a cancer therapeutic, however, have achieved little or no benefit. The mechanisms that drive therapeutic resistance to EGFR inhibitors in brain tumours are not well defined, and drug resistance contributes to the deadly and aggressive nature of the disease. Whole genome sequencing of four primary GBMs revealed multiple pathways by which EGFR protein abundance becomes deregulated in these tumours and will guide the development of new strategies for treating EGFR overexpressing tumours. Each of the four tumours displayed a different mechanism leading to increased EGFR protein levels. One mechanism is mediated by gene amplification and tandem duplication of the kinase domain. A second involves an intragenic deletion that generates a constitutively active form of the protein. A third combines the loss of a gene which encodes a protein that regulates EGFR abundance as well as an miRNA that modulates EGFR expression. A fourth mechanism entails loss of an ubiquitin ligase docking site in the C-terminal part of the protein whose absence inhibits turnover of the receptor.

// Victor M. Blanco 1 , Zhengtao Chu 1,2 , Subrahmanya D. Vallabhapurapu 1 , Mahaboob K. Sulaiman 1 , Ady Kendler 3 , Olivier Rixe 4 , Ronald E. Warnick 5 , Robert S. Franco 1 and Xiaoyang Qi 1,2 1 Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio 2 Division of Human Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio 3 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio 4 Division of Hematology/Oncology, Georgia Regents University, GRU Cancer Center, Augusta, Georgia 5 Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati Brain Tumor Center, and Mayfield Clinic, Cincinnati, Ohio Correspondence: Xiaoyang Qi, email: // Keywords : Glioblastoma; brain metastasis; SapC-DOPS; imaging; cancer therapy Received : June 2, 2014 Accepted: July 13, 2014 Published: July 14, 2014 Abstract Brain tumors, either primary (e.g., glioblastoma multiforme) or secondary (metastatic), remain among the most intractable and fatal of all cancers. We have shown that nanovesicles consisting of Saposin C (SapC) and dioleylphosphatidylserine (DOPS) are able to effectively target and kill cancer cells both in vitro and in vivo . These actions are a consequence of the affinity of SapC-DOPS for phosphatidylserine, an acidic phospholipid abundantly present in the outer membrane of a variety of tumor cells and tumor-associated vasculature. In this study, we first characterize SapC-DOPS bioavailability and antitumor effects on human glioblastoma xenografts, and confirm SapC-DOPS specificity towards phosphatidylserine by showing that glioblastoma targeting is abrogated after in vivo exposure to lactadherin, which binds phosphatidylserine with high affinity. Second, we demonstrate that SapC-DOPS selectively targets brain metastases-forming cancer cells both in vitro , in co-cultures with human astrocytes, and in vivo , in mouse models of brain metastases derived from human breast or lung cancer cells. Third, we demonstrate that SapC-DOPS nanovesicles have cytotoxic activity against metastatic breast cancer cells in vitro , and prolong the survival of mice harboring brain metastases. Taken together, these results support the potential of SapC-DOPS for the diagnosis and therapy of primary and metastatic brain tumors.

Background Whether patients with good prognosis and intermediate/poor prognosis advanced seminoma should be treated differently has not been defined. Objective To assess a risk-adapted chemotherapy regimen in patients with advanced seminoma. Design, setting, and participants A total of 132 patients were included in this prospective study. Patients with a good prognosis according to the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaboration Group (IGGCCG) were treated with four cycles of cisplatin-etoposide (EP). Patients with an intermediate prognosis according to the IGCCCG (or a poor prognosis according to the Medical Research Council classification) were treated with four cycles of VIP (EP and ifosfamide) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results and limitations The median follow-up was 4.5 yr (range: 0.4–11.6 yr). Among 108 patients (82%) with a good prognosis who received EP, grade 3–4 toxicity included neutropenia (47%) and neutropenic fever (12%). Among the 24 patients (18%) with an intermediate/poor prognosis who received VIP plus G-CSF, toxicity included grade 3–4 neutropenia (36%), neutropenic fever (23%), thrombocytopenia (23%), anemia (23%), and a toxicity-related death ( n =1; 4%). The 3-yr progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 93% (range: 85–97%) in the good prognosis group and 83% (range: 63–93%) in the intermediate/poor prognosis group ( p =0.03 for PFS). The 3-yr overall survival (OS) rate was 99% (range: 92–100%) and 87% (range: 67–95%), respectively ( p Conclusions A risk-adapted chemotherapy policy for advanced seminoma yielded an excellent outcome with a 3-yr OS rate of 96%.

e14141 Background: Pre clinical studies have demonstrated the effect of gut microbiome in the efficacy of immune check point inhibitors. The effect of antibiotic exposure to patients receiving PD-1/CTLA-4 inhibitor therapy has not been extensively studied, especially in metastatic melanoma. In this study, we demonstrate the effect of antibiotic exposure to metastatic melanoma patients receiving PD-1/CTLA-4 inhibitor therapy. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 108 patients with stage 4 metastatic melanoma who received immunotherapy with PD-1 inhibitors or CTLA-4 inhibitors or combination of both between Nov 2010 and Oct 2017. Patients were divided into Abx(+) and Abx(-) groups that were defined as patients exposed or not exposed to antibiotics respectively. The time frame for antibiotic exposure was taken from 6 months prior to 1 month after initiation of immunotherapy. We compared progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and response rate (RR) between the two groups. RR was calculated based on the entire length of follow-up. PFS and OS were assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Cox proportional hazards were used to calculate hazard ratios. Results: Out of 108 patients, 66 (61.1%) were men, with a mean age 64.6 ± 15.1 years. 46 (42.6%) patients were exposed to antibiotics of varied classes. Median PFS in abx(+) group [88 days (95%CI: 70, 104)] was shorter as compared to abx(-) group [322 days (95%CI: 191, 410), p < 0.0001)]. Patients in abx(-) group had a 68% (95%CI: 45, 82) reduced risk of progression within 200 days of immunotherapy initiation adjusting for sex, age and number of immunotherapy cycles (p < 0.0001) . Median OS in ab(+) group [294 days (95%CI: 198, 345)] was shorter as compared to abx(-) group [573 days (95%CI: 453, 677)], p < 0.0001. Response rate defined as percentage of patients whose cancer was stable or entered remission was 12.9% (95%CI: 5.7, 23.9) in abx(-) group as compared to 8.7% (95%CI: 2.4, 20.8) ab(+) group. Patients in abx(-) group had a 52% (95% CI: 24, 69) reduced risk of death adjusting for sex, age and number of immunotherapy cycles (p = 0.002). Conclusions: Antibiotic exposure is associated with poorer outcomes in patients with advanced metastatic melanoma being treated with PD-1/CTLA-4 inhibitors which is likely related to alteration of gut microbiome. Antibiotics should be prescribed with caution in patients undergoing treatment with immune check point inhibitors. These data should be validated in a larger patient population.

e13531 Background: BXQ-350 is composed of the multifunctional, lysosomal-activator protein Saposin C and phosphatidylserine lipid with demonstrated antitumor effects in vitro and in vivo. In this abstract we update the safety and pharmacokinetic (PK) profile based on an ongoing Phase 1 trial. Methods: BXQ-350 was administered in a Phase 1a dose-escalation trial (NCT02859857), and an ongoing Phase 1b trial (data cut off at max of 6 cycles, 01DEC2018) to refractory solid tumor/high-grade glioma patients (pts). In Phase 1a, pts received escalating IV BXQ-350 doses of 0.7, 1.1, 1.4, 1.8, or 2.4 mg/kg on days 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 10, 12, 15, 22 (cycle 1), 29 (cycle 2), and thereafter 28-day cycles. PK was assessed over a 24-hr period following the first dose. The Saposin C level was analyzed by ELISA and PK parameters were calculated using noncompartmental methods. Results: The 1a cohort of 18 pts (age 24-69) had a median of 3 cycles and 1b cohort of 20 pts (age 31-80) had median of 2 cycles with no treatment-related serious adverse events to date. Moderately severe related adverse events (AEs, n case, n events) are reported with serious non-related events. The most common treatment-related AE was fatigue (2 at dose 1.1, 2 at 1.8, 1 at 2.4mg/kg and 3 in 1b), at 2.4 mg/kg, 1 pt had moderate blood pressure elevation. Exposures in the 1.4 and 1.8 mg/kg cohorts were less than dose-proportional, likely due to higher clearance in those groups. The overall mean clearance and half-live values were 66.8 (mL/kg/h) and 4.03 h, respectively. Conclusions: BXQ-350 has had no serious related AEs during dose-escalation or in the on-going trial supporting a tolerable safety profile at 2.4 mg/kg. Clinical trial information: NCT02859857. [Table: see text]

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most aggressive brain tumor in adults and remains incurable despite multimodal intensive treatment regimens including surgical resection, radiation and chemotherapy. EGFRvIII is a truncated extracellular mutant of the EGF receptor (EGFR) found in about a third of GBMs. It confers enhanced tumorigenic behavior and is associated with chemo- and radio-resistance. GBM patients testing positive for EGFRvIII have a bleaker prognosis than those who do not. Targeting EGFRvIII positive tumors via vaccines or antibody-drug-conjugates represents a new challenging therapeutic avenue with potential great clinical benefits. In this study, we developed a strategy to detect EGFRvIII deletion in the circulating tumor DNA. The overall goal is to identify a simple and robust biomarker in the peripheral blood of patients diagnosed with GBM in order to follow their disease status while on treatment. Thirteen patients were included in this study, three of which were found to carry the EGFRvIII deletion. The circulating DNA status for EGFRvIII correlates with the analysis performed on the respective tumor samples, and its level seems to correlate with the extent of the tumor resection. This semi-quantitative blood biomarker may represent a strategy to (1) screen patients for an anti-EGFRvIII therapy and (2) monitor the patients' response to treatment.

Background Cetuximab is an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-blocking antibody that has been approved for the treatment of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and metastatic colorectal cancer, but no predictive biomarkers of activity have been yet identified. Establishment of such biomarkers will help identify a subset of patients that will benefit from cetuximab therapy. Methods In this paper, we report on a patient with HNSCC who had a complete tumour regression following treatment with cetuximab given as a single agent after initial surgery and radiation therapy. The EGFR protein expression level, the EGFR gene copy number and the EGFR gene sequence were assessed from both normal and tumour tissues. Results Besides protein overexpression and gene amplification in the tumour tissue, sequencing of the EGFR gene from the patient revealed the presence of two somatic mutations, one in the kinase domain (R705G) and the other in the ligand binding domain (P546S). Cells that stably express these EGFR mutants were treated with cetuximab and their sensitivity to the drug was compared to cells expressing the wildtype gene. While P546S mutation sensitised NIH-3T3 cells to cetuximab, R705G had a marginal effect. The double mutant (P546S/R705G) behaved like the P546S mutant, indicating that the mutation in the kinase domain does not contribute to the increased sensitivity to cetuximab. No mutations were found in K-RAS or B-RAF genes and no HPV protein or DNA was detected in the tumour. This is the first report of a somatic mutation in the EGFR ligand binding domain that may contribute to increased sensitivity to cetuximab. Conclusions Our results support a role for the P546S mutation in cetuximab sensitivity. Other factors including EGFR protein high copy number and protein overexpression may have also contributed to the observed response. The severity of a skin rash developed by this patient and its correlation with the antitumour activity does not exclude the involvement of the immune system (i.e. complement-mediated immune response) as well. The occurrence of the P546S mutation needs to be evaluated in HNSCC, as a well as a prospective evaluation of cetuximab anti-tumour activity in patients with tumours harbouring the mutation.

Axitinib is a potent and selective inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1, 2, and 3, approved for second-line therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Axitinib population pharmacokinetic and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships were evaluated. Using nonlinear mixed effects modeling with pooled data from 383 healthy volunteers, 181 patients with metastatic RCC, and 26 patients with other solid tumors in 17 trials, the disposition of axitinib was best described by a 2-compartment model with first-order absorption and a lag time, with estimated mean systemic clearance (CL) of 14.6 L/h and central volume of distribution (V(c)) of 47.3 L. Of 12 covariates tested, age over 60 years and Japanese ethnicity were associated with decreased CL, whereas V(c) increased with body weight. However, the magnitude of predicted changes in exposure based on these covariates does not warrant dose adjustments. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression and logistic regression analyses showed that higher exposure and diastolic blood pressure were independently associated with longer progression-free and overall survivals and higher probability of partial response in metastatic RCC patients. These findings support axitinib dose titration to increase plasma exposure in patients who tolerate axitinib, and also demonstrate diastolic blood pressure as a potential marker of efficacy.

Background To determine dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), recommended phase II trial dose (RPTD), safety, preliminary antitumour activity and pharmacokinetics of intravenous aflibercept with irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (LV5FU2). Patients and methods In this open-label study, 38 patients with advanced solid tumours received aflibercept 2, 4, 5, or 6 mg/kg on day 1, then irinotecan and LV5FU2 on days 1 and 2 every 2 weeks. Results Two grade 3/4 aflibercept-associated DLTs occurred with 4 mg/kg: proteinuria lasting >2 weeks and acute nephrotic syndrome with thrombotic microangiopathy. Two DLTs with 5 mg/kg (grade 3 stomatitis and grade 3 oesophagitis reflux) and three with 6 mg/kg (febrile neutropenia, grade 3 stomatitis and grade 3 abdominal pain) were considered related to concurrent chemotherapy and underlying disease. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia, hypertension and diarrhoea. Nine patients had partial responses, five with 4 mg/kg. Twenty-two patients had stable disease (five with 4 mg/kg), lasting >3 months in 17 patients. No anti-aflibercept antibodies were detected. Free aflibercept was in excess of bound in most patients on 4 mg/kg. Conclusion Based on pharmacokinetics, acceptable safety and encouraging antitumour activity, aflibercept 4 mg/kg was selected as the RPTD with irinotecan and LV5FU2 every 2 weeks.

Purpose Cabazitaxel has not been studied in patients with hepatic impairment (HI). This phase I study assessed cabazitaxel safety and pharmacokinetics in patients with HI. Methods Patients with advanced, non-hematologic cancer, and normal hepatic function (Cohort 1: C-1), or mild (C-2), moderate (C-3), severe (C-4) HI received cabazitaxel starting doses of 25, 20, 10, and 10 mg/m2, respectively. Doses were escalated in patients with HI based on Cycle 1 dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Adverse events and the cabazitaxel pharmacokinetic profile were assessed. Results In C-2, three patients receiving cabazitaxel 25 mg/m2 experienced DLTs; maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was 20 mg/m2. In C-3, two patients receiving 20 mg/m2 experienced DLTs; MTD was 15 mg/m2. C-4 was discontinued early due to DLTs. The most frequent cabazitaxel-related, grade 3–4 toxicity was neutropenia (42%). Cabazitaxel clearance normalized to body surface area (CL/BSA) was lower in C-1 (geometric mean [GM] 13.4 L/h/m2) than expected (26.4 L/h/m2), but similar in C-2 (23.5 L/h/m2) and C-3 (27.9 L/h/m2). CL/BSA in C-4 was 18.1 L/h/m2. Compared with C-2, CL/BSA increased 19% in C-3 (GM ratio 1.19; 90% CI 0.74–1.91), but decreased 23% in C-4 (0.77; 0.39–1.53). Cabazitaxel free fraction was unaltered. No significant correlation was found between grade 3–4 toxicities and pharmacokinetic parameters. Conclusions Mild–moderate HI did not cause substantial decline in cabazitaxel clearance. Cabazitaxel dose reductions in patients with mild–moderate HI, and a contraindication in patients with severe HI, are justified based on safety data.

Axitinib, an inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptors, is approved as second-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Agents targeting the VEGF pathway may induce renal toxicities, which may be influenced by pre-existing renal dysfunction. The objective was to characterize axitinib pharmacokinetics and safety in patients with renal impairment. Effect of renal function (baseline creatinine clearance [CrCL]) on axitinib clearance was evaluated in a population pharmacokinetic model in 207 patients with advanced solid tumors who received a standard axitinib starting dose, and in 383 healthy volunteers. Axitinib safety according to baseline CrCL was assessed in previously treated patients with RCC (n = 350) who received axitinib in the phase 3 AXIS study. Median axitinib clearance was 14.0, 10.7, 12.3, 7.81, and 12.6 L/h, respectively, in individuals with normal renal function (≥90 ml/min; n = 381), mild renal impairment (60–89 ml/min; n = 139), moderate renal impairment (30–59 ml/min; n = 64), severe renal impairment (15–29 ml/min; n = 5), and end-stage renal disease (

Purpose Axitinib (AG-013736), an oral, potent, and selective inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptors 1, 2, and 3, is under investigation for treatment of various solid tumors. The safety and pharmacokinetics of axitinib in combination with gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer was evaluated in the phase I portion of this trial. The randomized phase II portion was reported separately. Patients and methods Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who had received no prior chemotherapy were eligible for this study. Pharmacokinetic profiles of the drugs were obtained on cycle (C) 1 day (D) 1 (gemcitabine alone 1,000 mg/m2), C1D14 (steady state, axitinib alone 5 mg twice daily [BID]), and C1D15 (gemcitabine plus steady-state axitinib). Adverse events were monitored weekly at the clinic. Results Eight patients participated in the phase IB portion of the trial. Patients received gemcitabine on D1, D8, and D15 and continuous axitinib in a 28 day-cycle beginning C1D3. There was no dose-limiting toxicity. Common treatment-related adverse events included fatigue, diarrhea, dysphonia, and hypertension. Myelosuppression was similar to gemcitabine monotherapy. No apparent major pharmacokinetic interactions between gemcitabine and axitinib were observed. Of six patients evaluable for efficacy, three had confirmed partial responses. Conclusions Axitinib (5 mg BID) and gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m2) were well tolerated when administered together, without any pharmacokinetic interactions, and showed encouraging antitumor activity.

Purpose: To evaluate if diastolic blood pressure (dBP) ≥90 mm Hg during axitinib treatment is a marker of efficacy. Experimental Design: The relationship between dBP ≥90 mm Hg and efficacy was retrospectively explored across 5 phase II studies of single-agent axitinib for the treatment of 4 different tumor types. All patients had baseline BP ≤140/90 mm Hg and were stratified into 2 groups based on in-clinic BP measurements after initiating therapy: those with dBP Results: Two-hundred thirty patients were evaluated. Patients with dBP ≥90 mm Hg had a significantly lower relative risk of death than those with dBP Conclusions: Axitinib efficacy correlated with dBP ≥90 mm Hg. Further investigation of dBP as a predictive biomarker of efficacy in patients receiving axitinib is warranted. Clin Cancer Res; 17(11); 3841–9. ©2011 AACR.

Background: The aim of our study was to determine whether the presence of bone metastases affects outcomes in patients with metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (m-ccRCC) receiving sunitinib. Patients and methods: We reviewed the charts of all patients in four academic centers in Belgium and France who started first-line sunitinib (50 mg/day; 4 weeks on and 2 weeks off) between January 2005 and December 2008. Data were collected on known prognostic factors for metastatic renal cell carcinoma and metastatic sites. Response and progression were evaluated by computed tomography scan (according to RECIST). Results: Two hundred twenty-three patients were identified. With a median follow-up of 40 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) and median overall survival (OS) were significantly shorter in patients with bone metastases than in those without: respectively, 8.2 versus 19.1 months (P < 0.0001) and 19.5 versus 38.5 months (P < 0.0001). On multivariate analysis, taking on account platelet count, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, number of metastatic sites, neutrophil count, corrected serum calcium, time from diagnosis to systemic treatment, and the presence of bone metastases, bone metastasis was the independent variable most significantly associated with poor PFS (P < 0.0001) and OS (P = 0.001). Conclusion: The presence of bone metastases in m-ccRCC patients has a significant and clinically relevant negative impact on outcome on sunitinib.