Search

Your search keyword '"Olshan, Andrew F"' showing total 2,283 results
Start Over Author "Olshan, Andrew F"
2,283 results on '"Olshan, Andrew F"'

2. Using genome and transcriptome data from African-ancestry female participants to identify putative breast cancer susceptibility genes

Author

Ping, Jie, Jia, Guochong, Cai, Qiuyin, Guo, Xingyi, Tao, Ran, Ambrosone, Christine, Huo, Dezheng, Ambs, Stefan, Barnard, Mollie E., Chen, Yu, Garcia-Closas, Montserrat, Gu, Jian, Hu, Jennifer J., John, Esther M., Li, Christopher I., Nathanson, Katherine, Nemesure, Barbara, Olopade, Olufunmilayo I., Pal, Tuya, Press, Michael F., Sanderson, Maureen, Sandler, Dale P., Yoshimatsu, Toshio, Adejumo, Prisca O., Ahearn, Thomas, Brewster, Abenaa M., Hennis, Anselm J. M., Makumbi, Timothy, Ndom, Paul, O’Brien, Katie M., Olshan, Andrew F., Oluwasanu, Mojisola M., Reid, Sonya, Yao, Song, Butler, Ebonee N., Huang, Maosheng, Ntekim, Atara, Li, Bingshan, Troester, Melissa A., Palmer, Julie R., Haiman, Christopher A., Long, Jirong, and Zheng, Wei

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

3. Genome-wide association analyses of breast cancer in women of African ancestry identify new susceptibility loci and improve risk prediction

Author

Jia, Guochong, Ping, Jie, Guo, Xingyi, Yang, Yaohua, Tao, Ran, Li, Bingshan, Ambs, Stefan, Barnard, Mollie E., Chen, Yu, Garcia-Closas, Montserrat, Gu, Jian, Hu, Jennifer J., Huo, Dezheng, John, Esther M., Li, Christopher I., Li, James L., Nathanson, Katherine L., Nemesure, Barbara, Olopade, Olufunmilayo I., Pal, Tuya, Press, Michael F., Sanderson, Maureen, Sandler, Dale P., Shu, Xiao-Ou, Troester, Melissa A., Yao, Song, Adejumo, Prisca O., Ahearn, Thomas, Brewster, Abenaa M., Hennis, Anselm J. M., Makumbi, Timothy, Ndom, Paul, O’Brien, Katie M., Olshan, Andrew F., Oluwasanu, Mojisola M., Reid, Sonya, Butler, Ebonee N., Huang, Maosheng, Ntekim, Atara, Qian, Huijun, Zhang, Haoyu, Ambrosone, Christine B., Cai, Qiuyin, Long, Jirong, Palmer, Julie R., Haiman, Christopher A., and Zheng, Wei

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

8. Distinct Reproductive Risk Profiles for Intrinsic-Like Breast Cancer Subtypes: Pooled Analysis of Population-Based Studies

Author

Jung, Audrey Y, Ahearn, Thomas U, Behrens, Sabine, Middha, Pooja, Bolla, Manjeet K, Wang, Qin, Arndt, Volker, Aronson, Kristan J, Augustinsson, Annelie, Freeman, Laura E Beane, Becher, Heiko, Brenner, Hermann, Canzian, Federico, Carey, Lisa A, Consortium, CTS, Czene, Kamila, Eliassen, A Heather, Eriksson, Mikael, Evans, D Gareth, Figueroa, Jonine D, Fritschi, Lin, Gabrielson, Marike, Giles, Graham G, Guénel, Pascal, Hadjisavvas, Andreas, Haiman, Christopher A, Håkansson, Niclas, Hall, Per, Hamann, Ute, Hoppe, Reiner, Hopper, John L, Howell, Anthony, Hunter, David J, Hüsing, Anika, Kaaks, Rudolf, Kosma, Veli-Matti, Koutros, Stella, Kraft, Peter, Lacey, James V, Le Marchand, Loic, Lissowska, Jolanta, Loizidou, Maria A, Mannermaa, Arto, Maurer, Tabea, Murphy, Rachel A, Olshan, Andrew F, Olsson, Håkan, Patel, Alpa V, Perou, Charles M, Rennert, Gad, Shibli, Rana, Shu, Xiao-Ou, Southey, Melissa C, Stone, Jennifer, Tamimi, Rulla M, Teras, Lauren R, Troester, Melissa A, Truong, Thérèse, Vachon, Celine M, Wang, Sophia S, Wolk, Alicja, Wu, Anna H, Yang, Xiaohong R, Zheng, Wei, Dunning, Alison M, Pharoah, Paul DP, Easton, Douglas F, Milne, Roger L, Chatterjee, Nilanjan, Schmidt, Marjanka K, García-Closas, Montserrat, and Chang-Claude, Jenny

Subjects
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Cancer, Breast Cancer, Aging, Reproductive health and childbirth, Female, Humans, Breast Neoplasms, Receptor, ErbB-2, Receptors, Progesterone, Receptors, Estrogen, Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms, Case-Control Studies, Risk Factors, Biomarkers, Tumor, CTS Consortium, Receptor, erbB-2, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, Oncology and carcinogenesis
Abstract

BackgroundReproductive factors have been shown to be differentially associated with risk of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive and ER-negative breast cancer. However, their associations with intrinsic-like subtypes are less clear.MethodsAnalyses included up to 23 353 cases and 71 072 controls pooled from 31 population-based case-control or cohort studies in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium across 16 countries on 4 continents. Polytomous logistic regression was used to estimate the association between reproductive factors and risk of breast cancer by intrinsic-like subtypes (luminal A-like, luminal B-like, luminal B-HER2-like, HER2-enriched-like, and triple-negative breast cancer) and by invasiveness. All statistical tests were 2-sided.ResultsCompared with nulliparous women, parous women had a lower risk of luminal A-like, luminal B-like, luminal B-HER2-like, and HER2-enriched-like disease. This association was apparent only after approximately 10 years since last birth and became stronger with increasing time (odds ratio [OR] = 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.49 to 0.71; and OR = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.28 to 0.46 for multiparous women with luminal A-like tumors 20 to less than 25 years after last birth and 45 to less than 50 years after last birth, respectively). In contrast, parous women had a higher risk of triple-negative breast cancer right after their last birth (for multiparous women: OR = 3.12, 95% CI = 2.02 to 4.83) that was attenuated with time but persisted for decades (OR = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.79 to 1.34, for multiparous women 25 to less than 30 years after last birth). Older age at first birth (Pheterogeneity < .001 for triple-negative compared with luminal A-like breast cancer) and breastfeeding (Pheterogeneity < .001 for triple-negative compared with luminal A-like breast cancer) were associated with lower risk of triple-negative breast cancer but not with other disease subtypes. Younger age at menarche was associated with higher risk of all subtypes; older age at menopause was associated with higher risk of luminal A-like but not triple-negative breast cancer. Associations for in situ tumors were similar to luminal A-like.ConclusionsThis large and comprehensive study demonstrates a distinct reproductive risk factor profile for triple-negative breast cancer compared with other subtypes, with implications for the understanding of disease etiology and risk prediction.

Published
2022

10. Exome sequencing identifies genetic variants in anophthalmia and microphthalmia

Author

Li, Jingjing, Yang, Wei, Wang, Yuejun Jessie, Ma, Chen, Curry, Cynthia J, McGoldrick, Daniel, Nickerson, Deborah A, Chong, Jessica X, Blue, Elizabeth E, Mullikin, James C, Reefhuis, Jennita, Nembhard, Wendy N, Romitti, Paul A, Werler, Martha M, Browne, Marilyn L, Olshan, Andrew F, Finnell, Richard H, Feldkamp, Marcia L, Pangilinan, Faith, Almli, Lynn M, Bamshad, Mike J, Brody, Lawrence C, Jenkins, Mary M, Shaw, Gary M, Program, NISC Comparative Sequencing, Genomics, University of Washington Center for Mendelian, and Study, Birth Defects Prevention

Subjects
Eye Disease and Disorders of Vision, Genetics, Prevention, Pediatric, Human Genome, Clinical Research, Congenital Structural Anomalies, Aetiology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Anophthalmos, Exome, Humans, Infant, Microphthalmos, Mutation, Missense, Exome Sequencing, congenital abnormalities, genetic epidemiology, newborn eye abnormalities, NISC Comparative Sequencing Program, University of Washington Center for Mendelian Genomics, National Birth Defects Prevention Study, Clinical Sciences
Abstract

Anophthalmia and microphthalmia (A/M) are rare birth defects affecting up to 2 per 10,000 live births. These conditions are manifested by the absence of an eye or reduced eye volumes within the orbit leading to vision loss. Although clinical case series suggest a strong genetic component in A/M, few systematic investigations have been conducted on potential genetic contributions owing to low population prevalence. To overcome this challenge, we utilized DNA samples and data collected as part of the National Birth Defects Prevention Study (NBDPS). The NBDPS employed multi-center ascertainment of infants affected by A/M. We performed exome sequencing on 67 family trios and identified numerous genes affected by rare deleterious nonsense and missense variants in this cohort, including de novo variants. We identified 9 nonsense changes and 86 missense variants that are absent from the reference human population (Genome Aggregation Database), and we suggest that these are high priority candidate genes for A/M. We also performed literature curation, single cell transcriptome comparisons, and molecular pathway analysis on the candidate genes and performed protein structure modeling to determine the potential pathogenic variant consequences on PAX6 in this disease.

Published
2022

12. Aggregation tests identify new gene associations with breast cancer in populations with diverse ancestry

Author

Mueller, Stefanie H., Lai, Alvina G., Valkovskaya, Maria, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Bolla, Manjeet K., Wang, Qin, Dennis, Joe, Lush, Michael, Abu-Ful, Zomoruda, Ahearn, Thomas U., Andrulis, Irene L., Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antonenkova, Natalia N., Arndt, Volker, Aronson, Kristan J., Augustinsson, Annelie, Baert, Thais, Freeman, Laura E. Beane, Beckmann, Matthias W., Behrens, Sabine, Benitez, Javier, Bermisheva, Marina, Blomqvist, Carl, Bogdanova, Natalia V., Bojesen, Stig E., Bonanni, Bernardo, Brenner, Hermann, Brucker, Sara Y., Buys, Saundra S., Castelao, Jose E., Chan, Tsun L., Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chanock, Stephen J., Choi, Ji-Yeob, Chung, Wendy K., Colonna, Sarah V., Cornelissen, Sten, Couch, Fergus J., Czene, Kamila, Daly, Mary B., Devilee, Peter, Dörk, Thilo, Dossus, Laure, Dwek, Miriam, Eccles, Diana M., Ekici, Arif B., Eliassen, A. Heather, Engel, Christoph, Evans, D. Gareth, Fasching, Peter A., Fletcher, Olivia, Flyger, Henrik, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, Gao, Yu-Tang, García-Closas, Montserrat, García-Sáenz, José A., Genkinger, Jeanine, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Grassmann, Felix, Guénel, Pascal, Gündert, Melanie, Haeberle, Lothar, Hahnen, Eric, Haiman, Christopher A., Håkansson, Niclas, Hall, Per, Harkness, Elaine F., Harrington, Patricia A., Hartikainen, Jaana M., Hartman, Mikael, Hein, Alexander, Ho, Weang-Kee, Hooning, Maartje J., Hoppe, Reiner, Hopper, John L., Houlston, Richard S., Howell, Anthony, Hunter, David J., Huo, Dezheng, Ito, Hidemi, Iwasaki, Motoki, Jakubowska, Anna, Janni, Wolfgang, John, Esther M., Jones, Michael E., Jung, Audrey, Kaaks, Rudolf, Kang, Daehee, Khusnutdinova, Elza K., Kim, Sung-Won, Kitahara, Cari M., Koutros, Stella, Kraft, Peter, Kristensen, Vessela N., Kubelka-Sabit, Katerina, Kurian, Allison W., Kwong, Ava, Lacey, James V., Lambrechts, Diether, Le Marchand, Loic, Li, Jingmei, Linet, Martha, Lo, Wing-Yee, Long, Jirong, Lophatananon, Artitaya, Mannermaa, Arto, Manoochehri, Mehdi, Margolin, Sara, Matsuo, Keitaro, Mavroudis, Dimitrios, Menon, Usha, Muir, Kenneth, Murphy, Rachel A., Nevanlinna, Heli, Newman, William G., Niederacher, Dieter, O’Brien, Katie M., Obi, Nadia, Offit, Kenneth, Olopade, Olufunmilayo I., Olshan, Andrew F., Olsson, Håkan, Park, Sue K., Patel, Alpa V., Patel, Achal, Perou, Charles M., Peto, Julian, Pharoah, Paul D. P., Plaseska-Karanfilska, Dijana, Presneau, Nadege, Rack, Brigitte, Radice, Paolo, Ramachandran, Dhanya, Rashid, Muhammad U., Rennert, Gad, Romero, Atocha, Ruddy, Kathryn J., Ruebner, Matthias, Saloustros, Emmanouil, Sandler, Dale P., Sawyer, Elinor J., Schmidt, Marjanka K., Schmutzler, Rita K., Schneider, Michael O., Scott, Christopher, Shah, Mitul, Sharma, Priyanka, Shen, Chen-Yang, Shu, Xiao-Ou, Simard, Jacques, Surowy, Harald, Tamimi, Rulla M., Tapper, William J., Taylor, Jack A., Teo, Soo Hwang, Teras, Lauren R., Toland, Amanda E., Tollenaar, Rob A. E. M., Torres, Diana, Torres-Mejía, Gabriela, Troester, Melissa A., Truong, Thérèse, Vachon, Celine M., Vijai, Joseph, Weinberg, Clarice R., Wendt, Camilla, Winqvist, Robert, Wolk, Alicja, Wu, Anna H., Yamaji, Taiki, Yang, Xiaohong R., Yu, Jyh-Cherng, Zheng, Wei, Ziogas, Argyrios, Ziv, Elad, Dunning, Alison M., Easton, Douglas F., Hemingway, Harry, Hamann, Ute, and Kuchenbaecker, Karoline B.

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

13. Racial differences in breast cancer outcomes by hepatocyte growth factor pathway expression

Author

Jones, Gieira S, Hoadley, Katherine A, Benefield, Halei, Olsson, Linnea T, Hamilton, Alina M, Bhattacharya, Arjun, Kirk, Erin L, Tipaldos, Heather J, Fleming, Jodie M, Williams, Kevin P, Love, Michael I, Nichols, Hazel B, Olshan, Andrew F, and Troester, Melissa A

Subjects
Breast Cancer, Cancer, Genetics, Clinical Research, Good Health and Well Being, Black People, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Hepatocyte Growth Factor, Humans, Proportional Hazards Models, Race Factors, White People, Breast cancer, Hepatocyte growth factor, Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Oncology & Carcinogenesis
Abstract

PurposeBlack women have a 40% increased risk of breast cancer-related mortality. These outcome disparities may reflect differences in tumor pathways and a lack of targetable therapies for specific subtypes that are more common in Black women. Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) is a targetable pathway that promotes breast cancer tumorigenesis, is associated with basal-like breast cancer, and is differentially expressed by race. This study assessed whether a 38-gene HGF expression signature is associated with recurrence and survival in Black and non-Black women.MethodsStudy participants included 1957 invasive breast cancer cases from the Carolina Breast Cancer Study. The HGF signature was evaluated in association with recurrence (n = 1251, 171 recurrences), overall, and breast cancer-specific mortality (n = 706, 190/328 breast cancer/overall deaths) using Cox proportional hazard models.ResultsWomen with HGF-positive tumors had higher recurrence rates [HR 1.88, 95% CI (1.19, 2.98)], breast cancer-specific mortality [HR 1.90, 95% CI (1.26, 2.85)], and overall mortality [HR 1.69; 95% CI (1.17, 2.43)]. Among Black women, HGF positivity was significantly associated with higher 5-year rate of recurrence [HR 1.73; 95% CI (1.01, 2.99)], but this association was not significant in non-Black women [HR 1.68; 95% CI (0.72, 3.90)]. Among Black women, HGF-positive tumors had elevated breast cancer-specific mortality [HR 1.80, 95% CI (1.05, 3.09)], which was not significant in non-Black women [HR 1.52; 95% CI (0.78, 2.99)].ConclusionThis multi-gene HGF signature is a poor-prognosis feature for breast cancer and may identify patients who could benefit from HGF-targeted treatments, an unmet need for Black and triple-negative patients.

Published
2022

14. Gene-Level Germline Contributions to Clinical Risk of Recurrence Scores in Black and White Patients with Breast Cancer

Author

Patel, Achal, García-Closas, Montserrat, Olshan, Andrew F, Perou, Charles M, Troester, Melissa A, Love, Michael I, and Bhattacharya, Arjun

Subjects
Genetics, Clinical Research, Prevention, Cancer, Aging, Genetic Testing, Breast Cancer, Good Health and Well Being, Black People, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Gene Expression Profiling, Genes, Neoplasm, Germ Cells, Humans, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Risk Factors, White People, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Oncology & Carcinogenesis
Abstract

Continuous risk of recurrence scores (CRS) based on tumor gene expression are vital prognostic tools for breast cancer. Studies have shown that Black women (BW) have higher CRS than White women (WW). Although systemic injustices contribute substantially to breast cancer disparities, evidence of biological and germline contributions is emerging. In this study, we investigated germline genetic associations with CRS and CRS disparity using approaches modeled after transcriptome-wide association studies (TWAS). In the Carolina Breast Cancer Study, using race-specific predictive models of tumor expression from germline genetics, we performed race-stratified (N = 1,043 WW, 1,083 BW) linear regressions of three CRS (ROR-S: PAM50 subtype score; proliferation score; ROR-P: ROR-S plus proliferation score) on imputed tumor genetically regulated tumor expression (GReX). Bayesian multivariate regression and adaptive shrinkage tested GReX-prioritized genes for associations with tumor PAM50 expression and subtype to elucidate patterns of germline regulation underlying GReX-CRS associations. At FDR-adjusted P < 0.10, 7 and 1 GReX prioritized genes among WW and BW, respectively. Among WW, CRS were positively associated with MCM10, FAM64A, CCNB2, and MMP1 GReX and negatively associated with VAV3, PCSK6, and GNG11 GReX. Among BW, higher MMP1 GReX predicted lower proliferation score and ROR-P. GReX-prioritized gene and PAM50 tumor expression associations highlighted potential mechanisms for GReX-prioritized gene to CRS associations. Among patients with breast cancer, differential germline associations with CRS were found by race, underscoring the need for larger, diverse datasets in molecular studies of breast cancer. These findings also suggest possible germline trans-regulation of PAM50 tumor expression, with potential implications for CRS interpretation in clinical settings. SIGNIFICANCE: This study identifies race-specific genetic associations with breast cancer risk of recurrence scores and suggests mediation of these associations by PAM50 subtype and expression, with implications for clinical interpretation of these scores.

Published
2022

15. Genome-wide interaction analysis of menopausal hormone therapy use and breast cancer risk among 62,370 women

Author

Wang, Xiaoliang, Kapoor, Pooja Middha, Auer, Paul L, Dennis, Joe, Dunning, Alison M, Wang, Qin, Lush, Michael, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Bolla, Manjeet K, Aronson, Kristan J, Murphy, Rachel A, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Lee, Derrick G, Cordina-Duverger, Emilie, Guénel, Pascal, Truong, Thérèse, Mulot, Claire, Teras, Lauren R, Patel, Alpa V, Dossus, Laure, Kaaks, Rudolf, Hoppe, Reiner, Lo, Wing-Yee, Brüning, Thomas, Hamann, Ute, Czene, Kamila, Gabrielson, Marike, Hall, Per, Eriksson, Mikael, Jung, Audrey, Becher, Heiko, Couch, Fergus J, Larson, Nicole L, Olson, Janet E, Ruddy, Kathryn J, Giles, Graham G, MacInnis, Robert J, Southey, Melissa C, Le Marchand, Loic, Wilkens, Lynne R, Haiman, Christopher A, Olsson, Håkan, Augustinsson, Annelie, Krüger, Ute, Wagner, Philippe, Scott, Christopher, Winham, Stacey J, Vachon, Celine M, Perou, Charles M, Olshan, Andrew F, Troester, Melissa A, Hunter, David J, Eliassen, Heather A, Tamimi, Rulla M, Brantley, Kristen, Andrulis, Irene L, Figueroa, Jonine, Chanock, Stephen J, Ahearn, Thomas U, García-Closas, Montserrat, Evans, Gareth D, Newman, William G, van Veen, Elke M, Howell, Anthony, Wolk, Alicja, Håkansson, Niclas, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Ziogas, Argyrios, Jones, Michael E, Orr, Nick, Schoemaker, Minouk J, Swerdlow, Anthony J, Kitahara, Cari M, Linet, Martha, Prentice, Ross L, Easton, Douglas F, Milne, Roger L, Kraft, Peter, Chang-Claude, Jenny, and Lindström, Sara

Subjects
Genetics, Cancer, Aging, Human Genome, Breast Cancer, Prevention, Estrogen, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Breast, Breast Neoplasms, Estrogen Replacement Therapy, Female, Hormone Replacement Therapy, Humans, Male, Menopause, Risk Factors
Abstract

Use of menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) is associated with increased risk for breast cancer. However, the relevant mechanisms and its interaction with genetic variants are not fully understood. We conducted a genome-wide interaction analysis between MHT use and genetic variants for breast cancer risk in 27,585 cases and 34,785 controls from 26 observational studies. All women were post-menopausal and of European ancestry. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to test for multiplicative interactions between genetic variants and current MHT use. We considered interaction p-values

Published
2022

16. Germline variants and breast cancer survival in patients with distant metastases at primary breast cancer diagnosis.

Author

Escala-Garcia, Maria, Canisius, Sander, Keeman, Renske, Beesley, Jonathan, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Arndt, Volker, Augustinsson, Annelie, Becher, Heiko, Beckmann, Matthias W, Behrens, Sabine, Bermisheva, Marina, Bojesen, Stig E, Bolla, Manjeet K, Brenner, Hermann, Canzian, Federico, Castelao, Jose E, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chanock, Stephen J, Couch, Fergus J, Czene, Kamila, Daly, Mary B, Dennis, Joe, Devilee, Peter, Dörk, Thilo, Dunning, Alison M, Easton, Douglas F, Ekici, Arif B, Eliassen, A Heather, Fasching, Peter A, Flyger, Henrik, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, García-Closas, Montserrat, García-Sáenz, José A, Geisler, Jürgen, Giles, Graham G, Grip, Mervi, Gündert, Melanie, Hahnen, Eric, Haiman, Christopher A, Håkansson, Niclas, Hall, Per, Hamann, Ute, Hartikainen, Jaana M, Heemskerk-Gerritsen, Bernadette AM, Hollestelle, Antoinette, Hoppe, Reiner, Hopper, John L, Hunter, David J, Jacot, William, Jakubowska, Anna, John, Esther M, Jung, Audrey Y, Kaaks, Rudolf, Khusnutdinova, Elza, Koppert, Linetta B, Kraft, Peter, Kristensen, Vessela N, Kurian, Allison W, Lambrechts, Diether, Le Marchand, Loic, Lindblom, Annika, Luben, Robert N, Lubiński, Jan, Mannermaa, Arto, Manoochehri, Mehdi, Margolin, Sara, Mavroudis, Dimitrios, Muranen, Taru A, Nevanlinna, Heli, Olshan, Andrew F, Olsson, Håkan, Park-Simon, Tjoung-Won, Patel, Alpa V, Peterlongo, Paolo, Pharoah, Paul DP, Punie, Kevin, Radice, Paolo, Rennert, Gad, Rennert, Hedy S, Romero, Atocha, Roylance, Rebecca, Rüdiger, Thomas, Ruebner, Matthias, Saloustros, Emmanouil, Sawyer, Elinor J, Schmutzler, Rita K, Schoemaker, Minouk J, Scott, Christopher, Southey, Melissa C, Surowy, Harald, Swerdlow, Anthony J, Tamimi, Rulla M, Teras, Lauren R, Thomas, Emilie, Tomlinson, Ian, Troester, Melissa A, Vachon, Celine M, Wang, Qin, Winqvist, Robert, and Wolk, Alicja

Subjects
kConFab/AOCS Investigators, Cancer, Genetics, Breast Cancer, Prevention, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, 4.1 Discovery and preclinical testing of markers and technologies
Abstract

Breast cancer metastasis accounts for most of the deaths from breast cancer. Identification of germline variants associated with survival in aggressive types of breast cancer may inform understanding of breast cancer progression and assist treatment. In this analysis, we studied the associations between germline variants and breast cancer survival for patients with distant metastases at primary breast cancer diagnosis. We used data from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC) including 1062 women of European ancestry with metastatic breast cancer, 606 of whom died of breast cancer. We identified two germline variants on chromosome 1, rs138569520 and rs146023652, significantly associated with breast cancer-specific survival (P = 3.19 × 10-8 and 4.42 × 10-8). In silico analysis suggested a potential regulatory effect of the variants on the nearby target genes SDE2 and H3F3A. However, the variants showed no evidence of association in a smaller replication dataset. The validation dataset was obtained from the SNPs to Risk of Metastasis (StoRM) study and included 293 patients with metastatic primary breast cancer at diagnosis. Ultimately, larger replication studies are needed to confirm the identified associations.

Published
2021

19. Cross-ancestry GWAS meta-analysis identifies six breast cancer loci in African and European ancestry women.

Author

Adedokun, Babatunde, Du, Zhaohui, Gao, Guimin, Ahearn, Thomas U, Lunetta, Kathryn L, Zirpoli, Gary, Figueroa, Jonine, John, Esther M, Bernstein, Leslie, Zheng, Wei, Hu, Jennifer J, Ziegler, Regina G, Nyante, Sarah, Bandera, Elisa V, Ingles, Sue A, Press, Michael F, Deming-Halverson, Sandra L, Rodriguez-Gil, Jorge L, Yao, Song, Ogundiran, Temidayo O, Ojengbede, Oladosu, Blot, William, Troester, Melissa A, Nathanson, Katherine L, Hennis, Anselm, Nemesure, Barbara, Ambs, Stefan, Fiorica, Peter N, Sucheston-Campbell, Lara E, Bensen, Jeannette T, Kushi, Lawrence H, Torres-Mejia, Gabriela, Hu, Donglei, Fejerman, Laura, Bolla, Manjeet K, Dennis, Joe, Dunning, Alison M, Easton, Douglas F, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Pharoah, Paul DP, Wang, Qin, Sandler, Dale P, Taylor, Jack A, O'Brien, Katie M, Kitahara, Cari M, Falusi, Adeyinka G, Babalola, Chinedum, Yarney, Joel, Awuah, Baffour, Addai-Wiafe, Beatrice, GBHS Study Team, Chanock, Stephen J, Olshan, Andrew F, Ambrosone, Christine B, Conti, David V, Ziv, Elad, Olopade, Olufunmilayo I, Garcia-Closas, Montserrat, Palmer, Julie R, Haiman, Christopher A, and Huo, Dezheng

Subjects
GBHS Study Team, Humans, Breast Neoplasms, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Quantitative Trait Loci, Introns, African Continental Ancestry Group, European Continental Ancestry Group, Female, Genome-Wide Association Study
Abstract

Our study describes breast cancer risk loci using a cross-ancestry GWAS approach. We first identify variants that are associated with breast cancer at P

Published
2021

20. Genome-Wide Interaction Analysis of Menopausal Hormone Therapy Use and Breast Cancer Risk Among 62,370 Women

Author

Wang, Xiaoliang, Kapoor, Pooja Middha, Auer, Paul L, Dennis, Joe, Dunning, Alison M, Wang, Qin, Lush, Michael, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Bolla, Manjeet K, Aronson, Kristan J, Murphy, Rachel A, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Lee, Derrick G, Cordina-Duverger, Emilie, Guénel, Pascal, Truong, Thérèse, Mulot, Claire, Teras, Lauren R, Patel, Alpa V, Dossus, Laure, Kaaks, Rudolf, Hoppe, Reiner, Lo, Wing-Yee, Brüning, Thomas, Hamann, Ute, Czene, Kamila, Gabrielson, Marike, Hall, Per, Eriksson, Mikael, Jung, Audrey, Becher, Heiko, Couch, Fergus J, Larson, Nicole L, Olson, Janet E, Ruddy, Kathryn J, Giles, Graham G, MacInnis, Robert J, Southey, Melissa C, Marchand, Loic Le, Wilkens, Lynne R, Haiman, Christopher A, Olsson, Håkan, Augustinsson, Annelie, Krüger, Ute, Wagner, Philippe, Scott, Christopher, Winham, Stacey J, Vachon, Celine M, Perou, Charles M, Olshan, Andrew F, Troester, Melissa A, Hunter, David J, Eliassen, A Heather, Tamimi, Rulla M, Brantley, Kristen, Andrulis, Irene L, Figueroa, Jonine, Chanock, Stephen J, Ahearn, Thomas U, García-Closas, Montserrat, Evans, Gareth D, Newman, William G, Veen, Elke M van, Howell, Anthony, Wolk, Alicja, Håkansson, Niclas, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Ziogas, Argyrios, Jones, Michael E, Orr, Nick, Schoemaker, Minouk J, Swerdlow, Anthony J, Kitahara, Cari M, Linet, Martha, Prentice, Ross L, Easton, Douglas F, Milne, Roger L, Kraft, Peter, Chang-Claude, Jenny, and Lindström, Sara

Subjects
Cancer, Prevention, Breast Cancer, Genetics, Human Genome, Aging, Estrogen, Aetiology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Good Health and Well Being
Abstract

Abstract Background: Use of menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) is associated with increased risk for breast cancer. However, the relevant mechanisms and its interaction with genetic variants are not fully understood. Methods: We conducted a genome-wide interaction analysis between MHT use and genetic variants for breast cancer risk in 27,585 cases and 34,785 controls from 26 observational studies. All women were post-menopausal and of European ancestry. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to test for multiplicative interactions between genetic variants and current MHT use. We considered interaction p-values

Published
2021

21. Breast Cancer Risk Factors and Survival by Tumor Subtype: Pooled Analyses from the Breast Cancer Association ConsortiumBreast Cancer Risk Factors and Survival By Tumor Subtype

Author

Morra, Anna, Jung, Audrey Y, Behrens, Sabine, Keeman, Renske, Ahearn, Thomas U, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Arndt, Volker, Augustinsson, Annelie, Auvinen, Päivi K, Freeman, Laura E Beane, Becher, Heiko, Beckmann, Matthias W, Blomqvist, Carl, Bojesen, Stig E, Bolla, Manjeet K, Brenner, Hermann, Briceno, Ignacio, Brucker, Sara Y, Camp, Nicola J, Campa, Daniele, Canzian, Federico, Castelao, Jose E, Chanock, Stephen J, Choi, Ji-Yeob, Clarke, Christine L, Investigators, for the ABCTB, Couch, Fergus J, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Czene, Kamila, Dörk, Thilo, Dunning, Alison M, Dwek, Miriam, Easton, Douglas F, Eccles, Diana M, Egan, Kathleen M, Evans, D Gareth, Fasching, Peter A, Flyger, Henrik, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, Gapstur, Susan M, García-Sáenz, José A, Gaudet, Mia M, Giles, Graham G, Grip, Mervi, Guénel, Pascal, Haiman, Christopher A, Håkansson, Niclas, Hall, Per, Hamann, Ute, Han, Sileny N, Hart, Steven N, Hartman, Mikael, Heyworth, Jane S, Hoppe, Reiner, Hopper, John L, Hunter, David J, Ito, Hidemi, Jager, Agnes, Jakimovska, Milena, Jakubowska, Anna, Janni, Wolfgang, Kaaks, Rudolf, Kang, Daehee, Kapoor, Pooja Middha, Kitahara, Cari M, Koutros, Stella, Kraft, Peter, Kristensen, Vessela N, Collaborators, for the NBCS, Lacey, James V, Lambrechts, Diether, Le Marchand, Loic, Li, Jingmei, Lindblom, Annika, Lubiński, Jan, Lush, Michael, Mannermaa, Arto, Manoochehri, Mehdi, Margolin, Sara, Mariapun, Shivaani, Matsuo, Keitaro, Mavroudis, Dimitrios, Milne, Roger L, Muranen, Taru A, Newman, William G, Noh, Dong-Young, Nordestgaard, Børge G, Obi, Nadia, Olshan, Andrew F, Olsson, Håkan, Park-Simon, Tjoung-Won, Petridis, Christos, Pharoah, Paul DP, Plaseska-Karanfilska, Dijana, Presneau, Nadege, Rashid, Muhammad U, Rennert, Gad, Rennert, Hedy S, and Rhenius, Valerie

Subjects
Health Services and Systems, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Health Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Clinical Research, Aging, Estrogen, Cancer, Prevention, Breast Cancer, Good Health and Well Being, Adult, Aged, Breast Neoplasms, Cause of Death, Female, Humans, Life Style, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Invasiveness, Neoplasm Staging, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Survival Analysis, ABCTB Investigators, NBCS Collaborators, Medical and Health Sciences, Epidemiology, Biomedical and clinical sciences, Health sciences
Abstract

BackgroundIt is not known whether modifiable lifestyle factors that predict survival after invasive breast cancer differ by subtype.MethodsWe analyzed data for 121,435 women diagnosed with breast cancer from 67 studies in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium with 16,890 deaths (8,554 breast cancer specific) over 10 years. Cox regression was used to estimate associations between risk factors and 10-year all-cause mortality and breast cancer-specific mortality overall, by estrogen receptor (ER) status, and by intrinsic-like subtype.ResultsThere was no evidence of heterogeneous associations between risk factors and mortality by subtype (P adj > 0.30). The strongest associations were between all-cause mortality and BMI ≥30 versus 18.5-25 kg/m2 [HR (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.19 (1.06-1.34)]; current versus never smoking [1.37 (1.27-1.47)], high versus low physical activity [0.43 (0.21-0.86)], age ≥30 years versus 0-

Published
2021

22. Combined Associations of a Polygenic Risk Score and Classical Risk Factors With Breast Cancer Risk.

Author

Kapoor, Pooja Middha, Mavaddat, Nasim, Choudhury, Parichoy Pal, Wilcox, Amber N, Lindström, Sara, Behrens, Sabine, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Dennis, Joe, Bolla, Manjeet K, Wang, Qin, Jung, Audrey, Abu-Ful, Zomoroda, Ahearn, Thomas, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Arndt, Volker, Aronson, Kristan J, Auer, Paul L, Freeman, Laura E Beane, Becher, Heiko, Beckmann, Matthias W, Beeghly-Fadiel, Alicia, Benitez, Javier, Bernstein, Leslie, Bojesen, Stig E, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brenner, Hermann, Brüning, Thomas, Cai, Qiuyin, Campa, Daniele, Canzian, Federico, Carracedo, Angel, Carter, Brian D, Castelao, Jose E, Chanock, Stephen J, Chatterjee, Nilanjan, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Clarke, Christine L, Couch, Fergus J, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Czene, Kamila, Dai, James Y, Earp, H Shelton, Ekici, Arif B, Eliassen, A Heather, Eriksson, Mikael, Evans, D Gareth, Fasching, Peter A, Figueroa, Jonine, Fritschi, Lin, Gabrielson, Marike, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, Gao, Chi, Gapstur, Susan M, Gaudet, Mia M, Giles, Graham G, González-Neira, Anna, Guénel, Pascal, Haeberle, Lothar, Haiman, Christopher A, Håkansson, Niclas, Hall, Per, Hamann, Ute, Hatse, Sigrid, Heyworth, Jane, Holleczek, Bernd, Hoover, Robert N, Hopper, John L, Howell, Anthony, Hunter, David J, ABCTB Investigators, kConFab/AOCS Investigators, John, Esther M, Jones, Michael E, Kaaks, Rudolf, Keeman, Renske, Kitahara, Cari M, Ko, Yon-Dschun, Koutros, Stella, Kurian, Allison W, Lambrechts, Diether, Le Marchand, Loic, Lee, Eunjung, Lejbkowicz, Flavio, Linet, Martha, Lissowska, Jolanta, Llaneza, Ana, MacInnis, Robert J, Martinez, Maria Elena, Maurer, Tabea, McLean, Catriona, Neuhausen, Susan L, Newman, William G, Norman, Aaron, O'Brien, Katie M, Olshan, Andrew F, Olson, Janet E, Olsson, Håkan, and Orr, Nick

Subjects
ABCTB Investigators, kConFab/AOCS Investigators, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, Oncology and Carcinogenesis
Abstract

We evaluated the joint associations between a new 313-variant PRS (PRS313) and questionnaire-based breast cancer risk factors for women of European ancestry, using 72 284 cases and 80 354 controls from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. Interactions were evaluated using standard logistic regression and a newly developed case-only method for breast cancer risk overall and by estrogen receptor status. After accounting for multiple testing, we did not find evidence that per-standard deviation PRS313 odds ratio differed across strata defined by individual risk factors. Goodness-of-fit tests did not reject the assumption of a multiplicative model between PRS313 and each risk factor. Variation in projected absolute lifetime risk of breast cancer associated with classical risk factors was greater for women with higher genetic risk (PRS313 and family history) and, on average, 17.5% higher in the highest vs lowest deciles of genetic risk. These findings have implications for risk prevention for women at increased risk of breast cancer.

Published
2021

23. CYP3A7*1C allele: linking premenopausal oestrone and progesterone levels with risk of hormone receptor-positive breast cancers

Author

Johnson, Nichola, Maguire, Sarah, Morra, Anna, Kapoor, Pooja Middha, Tomczyk, Katarzyna, Jones, Michael E, Schoemaker, Minouk J, Gilham, Clare, Bolla, Manjeet K, Wang, Qin, Dennis, Joe, Ahearn, Thomas U, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antonenkova, Natalia N, Arndt, Volker, Aronson, Kristan J, Augustinsson, Annelie, Baynes, Caroline, Freeman, Laura E Beane, Beckmann, Matthias W, Benitez, Javier, Bermisheva, Marina, Blomqvist, Carl, Boeckx, Bram, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bojesen, Stig E, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brenner, Hermann, Burwinkel, Barbara, Campa, Daniele, Canzian, Federico, Castelao, Jose E, Chanock, Stephen J, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Clarke, Christine L, Conroy, Don M, Couch, Fergus J, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Czene, Kamila, Dörk, Thilo, Eliassen, A Heather, Engel, Christoph, Evans, D Gareth, Fasching, Peter A, Figueroa, Jonine, Floris, Giuseppe, Flyger, Henrik, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, Gapstur, Susan M, García-Closas, Montserrat, Gaudet, Mia M, Giles, Graham G, Goldberg, Mark S, González-Neira, Anna, Guénel, Pascal, Hahnen, Eric, Haiman, Christopher A, Håkansson, Niclas, Hall, Per, Hamann, Ute, Harrington, Patricia A, Hart, Steven N, Hooning, Maartje J, Hopper, John L, Howell, Anthony, Hunter, David J, Jager, Agnes, Jakubowska, Anna, John, Esther M, Kaaks, Rudolf, Keeman, Renske, Khusnutdinova, Elza, Kitahara, Cari M, Kosma, Veli-Matti, Koutros, Stella, Kraft, Peter, Kristensen, Vessela N, Kurian, Allison W, Lambrechts, Diether, Le Marchand, Loic, Linet, Martha, Lubiński, Jan, Mannermaa, Arto, Manoukian, Siranoush, Margolin, Sara, Martens, John WM, Mavroudis, Dimitrios, Mayes, Rebecca, Meindl, Alfons, Milne, Roger L, Neuhausen, Susan L, Nevanlinna, Heli, Newman, William G, Nielsen, Sune F, Nordestgaard, Børge G, Obi, Nadia, Olshan, Andrew F, and Olson, Janet E

Subjects
Estrogen, Human Genome, Clinical Research, Cancer, Aging, Breast Cancer, Genetics, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Alleles, Breast Neoplasms, Case-Control Studies, Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A, Estrone, Female, Genome-Wide Association Study, Humans, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Pregnanediol, Premenopause, Progesterone, Receptors, Estrogen, Receptors, Progesterone, NBCS Collaborators, AOCS Group, ABCTB Investigators, kConFab Investigators, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Public Health and Health Services, Oncology & Carcinogenesis
Abstract

BackgroundEpidemiological studies provide strong evidence for a role of endogenous sex hormones in the aetiology of breast cancer. The aim of this analysis was to identify genetic variants that are associated with urinary sex-hormone levels and breast cancer risk.MethodsWe carried out a genome-wide association study of urinary oestrone-3-glucuronide and pregnanediol-3-glucuronide levels in 560 premenopausal women, with additional analysis of progesterone levels in 298 premenopausal women. To test for the association with breast cancer risk, we carried out follow-up genotyping in 90,916 cases and 89,893 controls from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. All women were of European ancestry.ResultsFor pregnanediol-3-glucuronide, there were no genome-wide significant associations; for oestrone-3-glucuronide, we identified a single peak mapping to the CYP3A locus, annotated by rs45446698. The minor rs45446698-C allele was associated with lower oestrone-3-glucuronide (-49.2%, 95% CI -56.1% to -41.1%, P = 3.1 × 10-18); in follow-up analyses, rs45446698-C was also associated with lower progesterone (-26.7%, 95% CI -39.4% to -11.6%, P = 0.001) and reduced risk of oestrogen and progesterone receptor-positive breast cancer (OR = 0.86, 95% CI 0.82-0.91, P = 6.9 × 10-8).ConclusionsThe CYP3A7*1C allele is associated with reduced risk of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer possibly mediated via an effect on the metabolism of endogenous sex hormones in premenopausal women.

Published
2021

24. Improving the quality of toxicology and environmental health systematic reviews: What journal editors can do.

Author

Whaley, Paul, Blaauboer, Bas J, Brozek, Jan, Cohen Hubal, Elaine A, Hair, Kaitlyn, Kacew, Sam, Knudsen, Thomas B, Kwiatkowski, Carol F, Mellor, David T, Olshan, Andrew F, Page, Matthew J, Rooney, Andrew A, Radke, Elizabeth G, Shamseer, Larissa, Tsaioun, Katya, Tugwell, Peter, Wikoff, Daniele, and Woodruff, Tracey J

Subjects
environmental health, epidemiology, research standards, systematic review, toxicology, Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, Medical and Health Sciences, Toxicology
Abstract

Systematic reviews are fast increasing in prevalence in the toxicology and environmental health literature. However, how well these complex research projects are being conducted and reported is unclear. Since editors have an essential role in ensuring the scientific quality of manuscripts being published in their journals, a workshop was convened where editors, systematic review practitioners, and research quality control experts could discuss what editors can do to ensure the systematic reviews they publish are of sufficient scientific quality. Interventions were explored along four themes: setting standards; reviewing protocols; optimizing editorial workflows; and measuring the effectiveness of editorial interventions. In total, 58 editorial interventions were proposed. Of these, 26 were shortlisted for being potentially effective, and 5 were prioritized as short-term actions that editors could relatively easily take to improve the quality of published systematic reviews. Recent progress in improving systematic reviews is summarized, and outstanding challenges to further progress are highlighted.

Published
2021

26. Centered Partition Process: Informative Priors for Clustering

Author

Paganin, Sally, Herring, Amy H., Olshan, Andrew F., and Dunson, David B.

Subjects
Statistics - Methodology, Statistics - Applications
Abstract

There is a very rich literature proposing Bayesian approaches for clustering starting with a prior probability distribution on partitions. Most approaches assume exchangeability, leading to simple representations in terms of Exchangeable Partition Probability Functions (EPPF). Gibbs-type priors encompass a broad class of such cases, including Dirichlet and Pitman-Yor processes. Even though there have been some proposals to relax the exchangeability assumption, allowing covariate-dependence and partial exchangeability, limited consideration has been given on how to include concrete prior knowledge on the partition. For example, we are motivated by an epidemiological application, in which we wish to cluster birth defects into groups and we have prior knowledge of an initial clustering provided by experts. As a general approach for including such prior knowledge, we propose a Centered Partition (CP) process that modifies the EPPF to favor partitions close to an initial one. Some properties of the CP prior are described, a general algorithm for posterior computation is developed, and we illustrate the methodology through simulation examples and an application to the motivating epidemiology study of birth defects.

Published
2019
Full Text
View/download PDF

27. Breast Cancer Polygenic Risk Score and Contralateral Breast Cancer Risk

Author

Kramer, Iris, Hooning, Maartje J, Mavaddat, Nasim, Hauptmann, Michael, Keeman, Renske, Steyerberg, Ewout W, Giardiello, Daniele, Antoniou, Antonis C, Pharoah, Paul DP, Canisius, Sander, Abu-Ful, Zumuruda, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Aronson, Kristan J, Augustinsson, Annelie, Becher, Heiko, Beckmann, Matthias W, Behrens, Sabine, Benitez, Javier, Bermisheva, Marina, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bojesen, Stig E, Bolla, Manjeet K, Bonanni, Bernardo, Brauch, Hiltrud, Bremer, Michael, Brucker, Sara Y, Burwinkel, Barbara, Castelao, Jose E, Chan, Tsun L, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chanock, Stephen J, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Choi, Ji-Yeob, Clarke, Christine L, Collée, J Margriet, Couch, Fergus J, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Czene, Kamila, Daly, Mary B, Devilee, Peter, Dörk, Thilo, dos-Santos-Silva, Isabel, Dunning, Alison M, Dwek, Miriam, Eccles, Diana M, Evans, D Gareth, Fasching, Peter A, Flyger, Henrik, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, García-Closas, Montserrat, García-Sáenz, José A, Giles, Graham G, Goldgar, David E, González-Neira, Anna, Haiman, Christopher A, Håkansson, Niclas, Hamann, Ute, Hartman, Mikael, Heemskerk-Gerritsen, Bernadette AM, Hollestelle, Antoinette, Hopper, John L, Hou, Ming-Feng, Howell, Anthony, Ito, Hidemi, Jakimovska, Milena, Jakubowska, Anna, Janni, Wolfgang, John, Esther M, Jung, Audrey, Kang, Daehee, Kets, C Marleen, Khusnutdinova, Elza, Ko, Yon-Dschun, Kristensen, Vessela N, Kurian, Allison W, Kwong, Ava, Lambrechts, Diether, Le Marchand, Loic, Li, Jingmei, Lindblom, Annika, Lubiński, Jan, Mannermaa, Arto, Manoochehri, Mehdi, Margolin, Sara, Matsuo, Keitaro, Mavroudis, Dimitrios, Meindl, Alfons, Milne, Roger, Mulligan, Anna Marie, Muranen, Taru A, Neuhausen, Susan L, Nevanlinna, Heli, Newman, William G, Olshan, Andrew F, Olson, Janet E, Olsson, Håkan, Park-Simon, Tjoung-Won, and Peto, Julian

Subjects
Breast Cancer, Prevention, Cancer, Adult, Aged, Asian People, Breast Neoplasms, Cohort Studies, Estrogen Receptor alpha, Female, Gene Expression, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genome, Human, Genome-Wide Association Study, Humans, Middle Aged, Multifactorial Inheritance, Neoadjuvant Therapy, Neoplasms, Second Primary, Prognosis, Proportional Hazards Models, Receptor, ErbB-2, Receptors, Progesterone, Risk Assessment, White People, NBCS Collaborators, ABCTB Investigators, kConFab Investigators, Receptor, erbB-2, contralateral breast cancer, epidemiology, genetic, polygenic risk score, Biological Sciences, Medical and Health Sciences, Genetics & Heredity
Abstract

Previous research has shown that polygenic risk scores (PRSs) can be used to stratify women according to their risk of developing primary invasive breast cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the association between a recently validated PRS of 313 germline variants (PRS313) and contralateral breast cancer (CBC) risk. We included 56,068 women of European ancestry diagnosed with first invasive breast cancer from 1990 onward with follow-up from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. Metachronous CBC risk (N = 1,027) according to the distribution of PRS313 was quantified using Cox regression analyses. We assessed PRS313 interaction with age at first diagnosis, family history, morphology, ER status, PR status, and HER2 status, and (neo)adjuvant therapy. In studies of Asian women, with limited follow-up, CBC risk associated with PRS313 was assessed using logistic regression for 340 women with CBC compared with 12,133 women with unilateral breast cancer. Higher PRS313 was associated with increased CBC risk: hazard ratio per standard deviation (SD) = 1.25 (95%CI = 1.18-1.33) for Europeans, and an OR per SD = 1.15 (95%CI = 1.02-1.29) for Asians. The absolute lifetime risks of CBC, accounting for death as competing risk, were 12.4% for European women at the 10th percentile and 20.5% at the 90th percentile of PRS313. We found no evidence of confounding by or interaction with individual characteristics, characteristics of the primary tumor, or treatment. The C-index for the PRS313 alone was 0.563 (95%CI = 0.547-0.586). In conclusion, PRS313 is an independent factor associated with CBC risk and can be incorporated into CBC risk prediction models to help improve stratification and optimize surveillance and treatment strategies.

Published
2020

28. Alcohol drinking and head and neck cancer risk: the joint effect of intensity and duration

Author

Di Credico, Gioia, Polesel, Jerry, Dal Maso, Luigino, Pauli, Francesco, Torelli, Nicola, Luce, Daniele, Radoï, Loredana, Matsuo, Keitaro, Serraino, Diego, Brennan, Paul, Holcatova, Ivana, Ahrens, Wolfgang, Lagiou, Pagona, Canova, Cristina, Richiardi, Lorenzo, Healy, Claire M, Kjaerheim, Kristina, Conway, David I, Macfarlane, Gary J, Thomson, Peter, Agudo, Antonio, Znaor, Ariana, Franceschi, Silvia, Herrero, Rolando, Toporcov, Tatiana N, Moyses, Raquel A, Muscat, Joshua, Negri, Eva, Vilensky, Marta, Fernandez, Leticia, Curado, Maria Paula, Menezes, Ana, Daudt, Alexander W, Koifman, Rosalina, Wunsch-Filho, Victor, Olshan, Andrew F, Zevallos, Jose P, Sturgis, Erich M, Li, Guojun, Levi, Fabio, Zhang, Zuo-Feng, Morgenstern, Hal, Smith, Elaine, Lazarus, Philip, La Vecchia, Carlo, Garavello, Werner, Chen, Chu, Schwartz, Stephen M, Zheng, Tongzhang, Vaughan, Thomas L, Kelsey, Karl, McClean, Michael, Benhamou, Simone, Hayes, Richard B, Purdue, Mark P, Gillison, Maura, Schantz, Stimson, Yu, Guo-Pei, Chuang, Shu-Chun, Boffetta, Paolo, Hashibe, Mia, Yuan-Chin, Amy Lee, and Edefonti, Valeria

Subjects
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Dental/Oral and Craniofacial Disease, Alcoholism, Alcohol Use and Health, Digestive Diseases, Cancer, Prevention, Rare Diseases, Tobacco, Substance Misuse, Tobacco Smoke and Health, 2.2 Factors relating to the physical environment, Aetiology, Good Health and Well Being, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alcohol Drinking, Case-Control Studies, Female, Head and Neck Neoplasms, Humans, Laryngeal Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Mouth Neoplasms, Oropharyngeal Neoplasms, Risk Factors, Severity of Illness Index, Smoking, Time Factors, Young Adult, Public Health and Health Services, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, Oncology and carcinogenesis
Abstract

BackgroundAlcohol is a well-established risk factor for head and neck cancer (HNC). This study aims to explore the effect of alcohol intensity and duration, as joint continuous exposures, on HNC risk.MethodsData from 26 case-control studies in the INHANCE Consortium were used, including never and current drinkers who drunk ≤10 drinks/day for ≤54 years (24234 controls, 4085 oral cavity, 3359 oropharyngeal, 983 hypopharyngeal and 3340 laryngeal cancers). The dose-response relationship between the risk and the joint exposure to drinking intensity and duration was investigated through bivariate regression spline models, adjusting for potential confounders, including tobacco smoking.ResultsFor all subsites, cancer risk steeply increased with increasing drinks/day, with no appreciable threshold effect at lower intensities. For each intensity level, the risk of oral cavity, hypopharyngeal and laryngeal cancers did not vary according to years of drinking, suggesting no effect of duration. For oropharyngeal cancer, the risk increased with durations up to 28 years, flattening thereafter. The risk peaked at the higher levels of intensity and duration for all subsites (odds ratio = 7.95 for oral cavity, 12.86 for oropharynx, 24.96 for hypopharynx and 6.60 for larynx).ConclusionsPresent results further encourage the reduction of alcohol intensity to mitigate HNC risk.

Published
2020

29. Risk Prediction Models for Head and Neck Cancer in the US Population From the INHANCE Consortium

Author

Lee, Yuan-Chin Amy, Al-Temimi, Mohammed, Ying, Jian, Muscat, Joshua, Olshan, Andrew F, Zevallos, Jose P, Winn, Deborah M, Li, Guojun, Sturgis, Erich M, Morgenstern, Hal, Zhang, Zuo-Feng, Smith, Elaine, Kelsey, Karl, McClean, Michael, Vaughan, Thomas L, Lazarus, Philip, Chen, Chu, Schwartz, Stephen M, Gillison, Maura, Schantz, Stimson, Yu, Guo-Pei, D’Souza, Gypsyamber, Gross, Neil, Monroe, Marcus, Kim, Jaewhan, Boffetta, Paolo, and Hashibe, Mia

Subjects
Health Services and Systems, Health Sciences, Tobacco Smoke and Health, Dental/Oral and Craniofacial Disease, Substance Misuse, Cancer, Prevention, Rare Diseases, Tobacco, Good Health and Well Being, Aged, Case-Control Studies, Female, Head and Neck Neoplasms, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Theoretical, Risk Assessment, United States, absolute risk, head and neck cancer, hypopharyngeal cancer, laryngeal cancer, oral cavity cancer, oropharyngeal cancer, risk prediction, Mathematical Sciences, Medical and Health Sciences, Epidemiology
Abstract

Head and neck cancer (HNC) risk prediction models based on risk factor profiles have not yet been developed. We took advantage of the large database of the International Head and Neck Cancer Epidemiology (INHANCE) Consortium, including 14 US studies from 1981-2010, to develop HNC risk prediction models. Seventy percent of the data were used to develop the risk prediction models; the remaining 30% were used to validate the models. We used competing-risk models to calculate absolute risks. The predictors included age, sex, education, race/ethnicity, alcohol drinking intensity, cigarette smoking duration and intensity, and/or family history of HNC. The 20-year absolute risk of HNC was 7.61% for a 60-year-old woman who smoked more than 20 cigarettes per day for over 20 years, consumed 3 or more alcoholic drinks per day, was a high school graduate, had a family history of HNC, and was non-Hispanic white. The 20-year risk for men with a similar profile was 6.85%. The absolute risks of oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers were generally lower than those of oral cavity and laryngeal cancers. Statistics for the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were 0.70 or higher, except for oropharyngeal cancer in men. This HNC risk prediction model may be useful in promoting healthier behaviors such as smoking cessation or in aiding persons with a family history of HNC to evaluate their risks.

Published
2020

30. Dietary glycaemic index, glycaemic load and head and neck cancer risk: a pooled analysis in an international consortium

Author

Chang, Chun-Pin, La Vecchia, Carlo, Serraino, Diego, Olshan, Andrew F, Zevallos, Jose P, Morgenstern, Hal, Levi, Fabio, Garavello, Werner, Kelsey, Karl, McClean, Michael, Chen, Chu, Schwartz, Stephen M, Schantz, Stimson, Yu, Guo-Pei, Boffetta, Paolo, Hashibe, Mia, Lee, Yuan-Chin Amy, Parpinel, Maria, Augustin, Livia SA, Turati, Federica, Zhang, Zuo-Feng, and Edefonti, Valeria

Subjects
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Rare Diseases, Digestive Diseases, Prevention, Dental/Oral and Craniofacial Disease, Cancer, Case-Control Studies, Female, Glycemic Index, Glycemic Load, Head and Neck Neoplasms, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Public Health and Health Services, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, Oncology and carcinogenesis
Abstract

High dietary glycaemic index (GI) and glycaemic load (GL) may increase cancer risk. However, limited information was available on GI and/or GL and head and neck cancer (HNC) risk. We conducted a pooled analysis on 8 case-control studies (4081 HNC cases; 7407 controls) from the International Head and Neck Cancer Epidemiology (INHANCE) consortium. We estimated the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of HNC, and its subsites, from fixed- or mixed-effects logistic models including centre-specific quartiles of GI or GL. GI, but not GL, had a weak positive association with HNC (ORQ4 vs. Q1 = 1.16; 95% CI = 1.02-1.31). In subsites, we found a positive association between GI and laryngeal cancer (ORQ4 vs. Q1 = 1.60; 95% CI = 1.30-1.96) and an inverse association between GL and oropharyngeal cancer (ORQ4 vs. Q1 = 0.78; 95% CI = 0.63-0.97). This pooled analysis indicates a modest positive association between GI and HNC, mainly driven by laryngeal cancer.

Published
2020

31. A network analysis to identify mediators of germline-driven differences in breast cancer prognosis.

Author

Escala-Garcia, Maria, Abraham, Jean, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Arndt, Volker, Ashworth, Alan, Auer, Paul L, Auvinen, Päivi, Beckmann, Matthias W, Beesley, Jonathan, Behrens, Sabine, Benitez, Javier, Bermisheva, Marina, Blomqvist, Carl, Blot, William, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bojesen, Stig E, Bolla, Manjeet K, Børresen-Dale, Anne-Lise, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brenner, Hermann, Brucker, Sara Y, Burwinkel, Barbara, Caldas, Carlos, Canzian, Federico, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chanock, Stephen J, Chin, Suet-Feung, Clarke, Christine L, Couch, Fergus J, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Czene, Kamila, Daly, Mary B, Dennis, Joe, Devilee, Peter, Dunn, Janet A, Dunning, Alison M, Dwek, Miriam, Earl, Helena M, Eccles, Diana M, Eliassen, A Heather, Ellberg, Carolina, Evans, D Gareth, Fasching, Peter A, Figueroa, Jonine, Flyger, Henrik, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, Gapstur, Susan M, García-Closas, Montserrat, García-Sáenz, José A, Gaudet, Mia M, George, Angela, Giles, Graham G, Goldgar, David E, González-Neira, Anna, Grip, Mervi, Guénel, Pascal, Guo, Qi, Haiman, Christopher A, Håkansson, Niclas, Hamann, Ute, Harrington, Patricia A, Hiller, Louise, Hooning, Maartje J, Hopper, John L, Howell, Anthony, Huang, Chiun-Sheng, Huang, Guanmengqian, Hunter, David J, Jakubowska, Anna, John, Esther M, Kaaks, Rudolf, Kapoor, Pooja Middha, Keeman, Renske, Kitahara, Cari M, Koppert, Linetta B, Kraft, Peter, Kristensen, Vessela N, Lambrechts, Diether, Le Marchand, Loic, Lejbkowicz, Flavio, Lindblom, Annika, Lubiński, Jan, Mannermaa, Arto, Manoochehri, Mehdi, Manoukian, Siranoush, Margolin, Sara, Martinez, Maria Elena, Maurer, Tabea, Mavroudis, Dimitrios, Meindl, Alfons, Milne, Roger L, Mulligan, Anna Marie, Neuhausen, Susan L, Nevanlinna, Heli, Newman, William G, Olshan, Andrew F, Olson, Janet E, and Olsson, Håkan

Subjects
Germ Cells, Humans, Breast Neoplasms, GTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunits, GTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunits, Gq-G11, Receptors, Estrogen, Prognosis, Computational Biology, Signal Transduction, Apoptosis, Genotype, Female, Gene Regulatory Networks, Genetic Variation, Genome-Wide Association Study, Circadian Clocks, Gq-G11, Receptors, Estrogen, Cancer, Breast Cancer, Genetics, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, 4.1 Discovery and preclinical testing of markers and technologies
Abstract

Identifying the underlying genetic drivers of the heritability of breast cancer prognosis remains elusive. We adapt a network-based approach to handle underpowered complex datasets to provide new insights into the potential function of germline variants in breast cancer prognosis. This network-based analysis studies ~7.3 million variants in 84,457 breast cancer patients in relation to breast cancer survival and confirms the results on 12,381 independent patients. Aggregating the prognostic effects of genetic variants across multiple genes, we identify four gene modules associated with survival in estrogen receptor (ER)-negative and one in ER-positive disease. The modules show biological enrichment for cancer-related processes such as G-alpha signaling, circadian clock, angiogenesis, and Rho-GTPases in apoptosis.

Published
2020

32. Age at start of using tobacco on the risk of head and neck cancer: Pooled analysis in the International Head and Neck Cancer Epidemiology Consortium (INHANCE)

Author

Chang, Chun-Pin, Chang, Shen-Chih, Chuang, Shu-Chun, Berthiller, Julien, Ferro, Gilles, Matsuo, Keitaro, Wünsch-Filho, Victor, Toporcov, Tatiana N, de Carvalho, Marcos Brasilino, La Vecchia, Carlo, Olshan, Andrew F, Zevallos, Jose P, Serraino, Diego, Muscat, Joshua, Sturgis, Erich M, Li, Guojun, Morgenstern, Hal, Levi, Fabio, Dal Maso, Luigino, Smith, Elaine, Kelsey, Karl, McClean, Michael, Vaughan, Thomas L, Lazarus, Philip, Ramroth, Heribert, Chen, Chu, Schwartz, Stephen M, Winn, Deborah M, Bosetti, Cristina, Edefonti, Valeria, Garavello, Werner, Negri, Eva, Hayes, Richard B, Purdue, Mark P, Boccia, Stefania, Cadoni, Gabriella, Shangina, Oxana, Koifman, Rosalina, Curado, Maria Paula, Vilensky, Marta, Swiatkowska, Beata, Herrero, Rolando, Franceschi, Silvia, Benhamou, Simone, Fernandez, Leticia, Menezes, Ana MB, Daudt, Alexander W, Mates, Dana, Schantz, Stimson, Yu, Guo-Pei, Lissowska, Jolanta, Brenner, Hermann, Fabianova, Eleonora, Rudnai, Peter, Brennan, Paul, Boffetta, Paolo, Zhang, Zuo-Feng, Hashibe, Mia, and Lee, Yuan-Chin Amy

Subjects
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Epidemiology, Health Services and Systems, Health Sciences, Public Health, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Prevention, Rare Diseases, Cancer, Tobacco Smoke and Health, Dental/Oral and Craniofacial Disease, Substance Misuse, Tobacco, Aetiology, 2.2 Factors relating to the physical environment, Good Health and Well Being, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Case-Control Studies, Female, Head and Neck Neoplasms, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Nicotiana, Age at start of tobacco use, Head and neck cancer, Oral cancer, Oropharyngeal cancer, Hypopharyngeal cancer, Laryngeal cancer, Public Health and Health Services, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, Oncology and carcinogenesis
Abstract

BackgroundTobacco use is a well-established risk factor for head and neck cancer (HNC). However, less is known about the potential impact of exposure to tobacco at an early age on HNC risk.MethodsWe analyzed individual-level data on ever tobacco smokers from 27 case-control studies (17,146 HNC cases and 17,449 controls) in the International Head and Neck Cancer Epidemiology (INHANCE) consortium. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using random-effects logistic regression models.ResultsWithout adjusting for tobacco packyears, we observed that younger age at starting tobacco use was associated with an increased HNC risk for ever smokers (OR

Published
2019

37. Case-Case Genome-Wide Analyses Identify Subtype-Informative Variants that Confer Risk for Breast Cancer

Author

Sun, Xiaohui, primary, Verma, Shiv Prakash, additional, Jia, Guochong, additional, Wang, Xinjun, additional, Ping, Jie, additional, Guo, Xingyi, additional, Shu, Xiao-Ou, additional, Chen, Jianhong, additional, Derkach, Andriy, additional, Cai, Qiuyin, additional, Liang, Xiaolin, additional, Long, Jirong, additional, Offit, Kenneth, additional, Oh, Jung Hun, additional, Reiner, Anne S., additional, Watt, Gordon P., additional, Woods, Meghan, additional, Yang, Yaohua, additional, Ambrosone, Christine B., additional, Ambs, Stefan, additional, Chen, Yu, additional, Concannon, Patrick, additional, Garcia-Closas, Montserrat, additional, Gu, Jian, additional, Haiman, Christopher A., additional, Hu, Jennifer J., additional, Huo, Dezheng, additional, John, Esther M., additional, Knight, Julia A., additional, Li, Christopher I., additional, Lynch, Charles F., additional, Mellemkjaer, Lene, additional, Nathanson, Katherine L., additional, Nemesure, Barbara, additional, Olopade, Olufunmilayo I., additional, Olshan, Andrew F., additional, Pal, Tuya, additional, Palmer, Julie R., additional, Press, Michael F., additional, Sanderson, Maureen, additional, Sandler, Dale P., additional, Troester, Melissa A., additional, Zheng, Wei, additional, Bernstein, Jonine L., additional, Buas, Matthew F., additional, and Shu, Xiang, additional

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

39. Joint effects of intensity and duration of cigarette smoking on the risk of head and neck cancer: A bivariate spline model approach

Author

Di Credico, Gioia, Edefonti, Valeria, Polesel, Jerry, Pauli, Francesco, Torelli, Nicola, Serraino, Diego, Negri, Eva, Luce, Daniele, Stucker, Isabelle, Matsuo, Keitaro, Brennan, Paul, Vilensky, Marta, Fernandez, Leticia, Curado, Maria Paula, Menezes, Ana, Daudt, Alexander W, Koifman, Rosalina, Wunsch-Filho, Victor, Holcatova, Ivana, Ahrens, Wolfgang, Lagiou, Pagona, Simonato, Lorenzo, Richiardi, Lorenzo, Healy, Claire, Kjaerheim, Kristina, Conway, David I, Macfarlane, Tatiana V, Thomson, Peter, Agudo, Antonio, Znaor, Ariana, Rios, Leonardo F Boaventura, Toporcov, Tatiana N, Franceschi, Silvia, Herrero, Rolando, Muscat, Joshua, Olshan, Andrew F, Zevallos, Jose P, La Vecchia, Carlo, Winn, Deborah M, Sturgis, Erich M, Li, Guojun, Fabianova, Eleonora, Lissowska, Jolanda, Mates, Dana, Rudnai, Peter, Shangina, Oxana, Swiatkowska, Beata, Moysich, Kirsten, Zhang, Zuo-Feng, Morgenstern, Hal, Levi, Fabio, Smith, Elaine, Lazarus, Philip, Bosetti, Cristina, Garavello, Werner, Kelsey, Karl, McClean, Michael, Ramroth, Heribert, Chen, Chu, Schwartz, Stephen M, Vaughan, Thomas L, Zheng, Tongzhang, Menvielle, Gwenn, Boccia, Stefania, Cadoni, Gabriella, Hayes, Richard B, Purdue, Mark, Gillison, Maura, Schantz, Stimson, Yu, Guo-Pei, Brenner, Hermann, D'Souza, Gypsyamber, Gross, Neil D, Chuang, Shu-Chun, Boffetta, Paolo, Hashibe, Mia, Lee, Yuan-Chin Amy, and Dal Maso, Luigino

Subjects
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Prevention, Tobacco Smoke and Health, Substance Misuse, Tobacco, Dental/Oral and Craniofacial Disease, Rare Diseases, Cancer, 2.2 Factors relating to the physical environment, Good Health and Well Being, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Case-Control Studies, Cigarette Smoking, Female, Head and Neck Neoplasms, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Bivariate spline models, Cigarette smoking duration, Cigarette smoking intensity, Head and neck cancer, INHANCE, Laryngeal cancer, Oral cavity and pharyngeal cancers, Dentistry, Public Health and Health Services, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, Oncology and carcinogenesis
Abstract

ObjectivesThis study aimed at re-evaluating the strength and shape of the dose-response relationship between the combined (or joint) effect of intensity and duration of cigarette smoking and the risk of head and neck cancer (HNC). We explored this issue considering bivariate spline models, where smoking intensity and duration were treated as interacting continuous exposures.Materials and methodsWe pooled individual-level data from 33 case-control studies (18,260 HNC cases and 29,844 controls) participating in the International Head and Neck Cancer Epidemiology (INHANCE) consortium. In bivariate regression spline models, exposures to cigarette smoking intensity and duration (compared with never smokers) were modeled as a linear piecewise function within a logistic regression also including potential confounders. We jointly estimated the optimal knot locations and regression parameters within the Bayesian framework.ResultsFor oral-cavity/pharyngeal (OCP) cancers, an odds ratio (OR) >5 was reached after 30 years in current smokers of ∼20 or more cigarettes/day. Patterns of OCP cancer risk in current smokers differed across strata of alcohol intensity. For laryngeal cancer, ORs >20 were found for current smokers of ≥20 cigarettes/day for ≥30  years. In former smokers who quit ≥10  years ago, the ORs were approximately halved for OCP cancers, and ∼1/3 for laryngeal cancer, as compared to the same levels of intensity and duration in current smokers.ConclusionReferring to bivariate spline models, this study better quantified the joint effect of intensity and duration of cigarette smoking on HNC risk, further stressing the need of smoking cessation policies.

Published
2019

42. Investigating the effect of sexual behaviour on oropharyngeal cancer risk: a methodological assessment of Mendelian randomization

Author

Gormley, Mark, Dudding, Tom, Kachuri, Linda, Burrows, Kimberley, Chong, Amanda H. W., Martin, Richard M., Thomas, Steven J., Tyrrell, Jessica, Ness, Andrew R., Brennan, Paul, Munafò, Marcus R., Pring, Miranda, Boccia, Stefania, Olshan, Andrew F., Diergaarde, Brenda, Hung, Rayjean J., Liu, Geoffrey, Tajara, Eloiza H., Severino, Patricia, Toporcov, Tatiana N., Lacko, Martin, Waterboer, Tim, Brenner, Nicole, Smith, George Davey, Vincent, Emma E., and Richmond, Rebecca C.

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

44. Cancer information and population health resource: a resource for catchment area data and cancer outcomes research.

Author

Baggett, Christopher D, Jackson, Bradford E, Green, Laura, Kuo, Tzy-Mey, Kim, KyungSu, Zhou, Xi, Reeder-Hayes, Katherine E, Lund, Jennifer L, Wheeler, Stephanie B, and Olshan, Andrew F

Subjects
WATERSHEDS, HEALTH insurance, POPULATION health, CANCER diagnosis, DATABASES
Abstract

Background The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center has developed a novel data resource, the Cancer Information and Population Health Resource (CIPHR), for conducting catchment area evaluation and cancer population health research that links the North Carolina Central Cancer Registry (NCCCR) to medical and pharmacy claims data from Medicare, Medicaid, and private plans operating within North Carolina. This study's aim was to describe the CIPHR data and provide examples of potential cohorts available in those data. Methods We present the underlying populations included in the NCCCR and claims data before linkage and demonstrate estimated sample sizes when these data are linked and commonly used insurance enrollment criteria are applied. Results Data for the years 2003-2020 are present in CIPHR and include 947 977 cancer cases from the NCCCR and 21.6 million enrollees in public and private health insurance (cancer and noncancer cases). When limited to first or only cancers (n = 672 377), 86% could be linked to insurance enrollment for at least 1 month during 2003-2020 (n = 582 638), with 62% of individuals linking to enrollment during the month of cancer diagnosis. Among all registry cancer cases, 47% (n = 317 898) had continuous insurance enrollment for at least 12 months before and after cancer diagnosis. Conclusion CIPHR illustrates the utility of establishing and maintaining a statewide, comprehensive cancer population health database. This resource serves to characterize the cancer center catchment area and aids in tracking cancer outcomes and trends in care delivery as well as identifying disparities that require intervention and policy focus. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

45. Survival of Children With Critical Congenital Heart Defects in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study.

Author

Forestieri, Nina E., Olshan, Andrew F., Oster, Matthew E., Ailes, Elizabeth C., Fundora, Michael P., Fisher, Sarah C., Shumate, Charles, Romitti, Paul A., F. Liberman, Rebecca, Nembhard, Wendy N., Carmichael, Suzan L., and Desrosiers, Tania A.

Abstract

Background: Critical congenital heart defects (CCHDs) are associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. This study estimated survival of children with nonsyndromic CCHDs and evaluated relationships between exposures of interest and survival by CCHD severity (univentricular or biventricular function). Methods: This analysis included 4380 infants with CCHDs (cases) born during 1999–2011 and enrolled in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study, a multisite, population‐based case–control study of major birth defects. Cases were linked to state death files. Nonparametric Kaplan–Meier survival functions were used to estimate 1‐ and 5‐year survival probabilities overall and by severity group (univentricular/biventricular) stratified by demographic and clinical exposure variables of interest. The log‐rank test was used to determine whether stratified survival curves were equivalent. Survival and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were also estimated using Cox proportional hazards modeling adjusted for maternal age, education, race/ethnicity, study site, and birth year. Results: One‐ and five‐year survival rates were 85.8% (CI 84.7–86.8) and 83.7% (CI 82.5–84.9), respectively. Univentricular 5‐year survival was lower than biventricular case survival [65.3% (CI 61.7–68.5) vs. 89.0% (CI 87.8–90.1; p < 0.001)]. Clinical factors (e.g. preterm birth, low birthweight, and complex/multiple defects) were associated with lower survival in each severity group. Sociodemographic factors (non‐Hispanic Black race/ethnicity,

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

47. Interaction between known risk factors for head and neck cancer and socioeconomic status: the Carolina Head and Neck Cancer Study

Author

Stanford-Moore, Gaelen, Bradshaw, Patrick T, Weissler, Mark C, Zevallos, Jose P, Brennan, Paul, Anantharaman, Devasena, Abedi-Ardekani, Behnoush, and Olshan, Andrew F

Subjects
Epidemiology, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Public Health, Health Sciences, Rare Diseases, Clinical Research, Prevention, Cancer, Dental/Oral and Craniofacial Disease, Good Health and Well Being, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alcohol Drinking, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Case-Control Studies, Female, Head and Neck Neoplasms, Humans, Income, Logistic Models, Male, Middle Aged, North Carolina, Odds Ratio, Oral Health, Risk Factors, Smoking, Social Class, Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck, Young Adult, Case-control studies, Head and neck cancer, Risk factors, Socioeconomic status, Tobacco, Alcohol, Case–control studies, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Public Health and Health Services, Oncology and carcinogenesis
Abstract

Prior studies of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) have explored the effect of socioeconomic status (SES) as an independent risk factor; however, none have investigated the interaction of known risk factors with SES. We examined this using the North Carolina Head and Neck Cancer Epidemiology Study, a population-based case-control study. Incident cases of SCCHN from North Carolina between 2002 and 2006 (n = 1,153) were identified and age, sex, and race-matched controls (n = 1,267) were selected from driver license records. SES measures included household income, educational attainment, and health insurance. Logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Current smoking was more strongly associated with SCCHN among those households making  $50,000/year [OR 2.47 (1.69-3.25); p interaction  $50,000/year [1.28 (0.97-1.58); p interaction

Published
2018

48. Racial differences in the relationship between tobacco, alcohol, and the risk of head and neck cancer: pooled analysis of US studies in the INHANCE Consortium

Author

Voltzke, Kristin J, Lee, Yuan-Chin Amy, Zhang, Zuo-Feng, Zevallos, Jose P, Yu, Guo-Pei, Winn, Deborah M, Vaughan, Thomas L, Sturgis, Erich M, Smith, Elaine, Schwartz, Stephen M, Schantz, Stimson, Muscat, Joshua, Morgenstern, Hal, McClean, Michael, Li, Guojun, Lazarus, Philip, Kelsey, Karl, Gillison, Maura, Chen, Chu, Boffetta, Paolo, Hashibe, Mia, and Olshan, Andrew F

Subjects
Epidemiology, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Public Health, Health Sciences, Tobacco Smoke and Health, Rare Diseases, Dental/Oral and Craniofacial Disease, Alcoholism, Alcohol Use and Health, Substance Misuse, Prevention, Cancer, Clinical Research, Tobacco, Good Health and Well Being, Alcohol Drinking, Case-Control Studies, Head and Neck Neoplasms, Humans, Racial Groups, Risk Factors, Tobacco Use, United States, Head and neck cancer, Alcohol, Cigarette smoking, African American, Racial difference, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Public Health and Health Services, Oncology and carcinogenesis
Abstract

There have been few published studies on differences between Blacks and Whites in the estimated effects of alcohol and tobacco use on the incidence of head and neck cancer (HNC) in the United States. Previous studies have been limited by small numbers of Blacks. Using pooled data from 13 US case-control studies of oral, pharyngeal, and laryngeal cancers in the International Head and Neck Cancer Epidemiology Consortium, this study comprised a large number of Black HNC cases (n = 975). Logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for several tobacco and alcohol consumption characteristics. Blacks were found to have consistently stronger associations than Whites for the majority of tobacco consumption variables. For example, compared to never smokers, Blacks who smoked cigarettes for > 30 years had an OR 4.53 (95% CI 3.22-6.39), which was larger than that observed in Whites (OR 3.01, 95% CI 2.73-3.33; pinteraction

Published
2018

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results