Search

Due to the increasing use of immunosuppressants, particularly biological therapy, as well as HIV epidemics, latent tuberculosis (LTBI) is being activated, and this disease, which had been rather forgotten in the Western world, is becoming a topical issue in the recent years. Numerous categories of patients should be tested for latent tuberculosis, using PPD or IGRA tests. Interpreting test results is a very touchy issue, since it is the way to determine therapy of latent TB, that is, to decide on chemoprophylaxis. For the last two years, during the Covid-19 pandemics, large percentage of patients received high doses of corticosteroid and other types of immunosuppressant therapies, and it is therefore necessary to consider the potential risks for these patients, in terms of contracting tuberculosis and perhaps testing them for LTBI.

Background: Until now, a proper biomarker(s) to evaluate sarcoidosis activity has not been recognized. The aims of this study were to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the two biomarkers of sarcoidosis activity already in use (serum angiotensin converting enzyme - ACE and serum chitotriosidase) in a population of 430 sarcoidosis patients. The activities of these markers were also analyzed in a group of 264 healthy controls. Methods: Four hundred and thirty biopsy positive sarcoidosis patients were divided into groups with active and inactive disease, and groups with acute or chronic disease. In a subgroup of 55 sarcoidosis patients, activity was also assessed by F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG-PET) scanning. Both serum chitotriosidase and ACE levels showed non-normal distribution, so nonparametric tests were used in statistical analysis. Results: Serum chitotriosidase activities were almost 6 times higher in patients with active sarcoidosis than in healthy controls and inactive disease. A serum chitotriosidase value of 100 nmol/mL/h had the sensitivity of 82.5% and specificity of 70.0%. A serum ACE activity cutoff value of 32.0 U/L had the sensitivity of 66.0% and the specificity of 54%. A statistically significant correlation was obtained between the focal granulomatous activity detected on 18F-FDG PET/CT and serum chitotriosidase levels, but no such correlation was found with ACE. The levels of serum chitotriosidase activity significantly correlated with the disease duration (P< 0.0001). Also, serum chitotriosidase significantly correlated with clinical outcome status (COS) categories (p = 0.272, P = 0.001). Conclusions: Serum chitotriosidase proved to be a reliable biomarker of sarcoidosis activity and disease chronicity.

Recently published data indicate that vitamin D abnormalities are common in sarcoidosis patients. The purpose of this study was to compare serum vitamin 25(OH)D levels among sarcoidosis patients with different clinical courses of the disease. The study also included the first observations on cognitive functions (i.e. depression and fatigue syndrome) in relation to vitamin D deficiency in sarcoidosis patients. At the Biochemical Laboratory of the Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, vitamin D25(OH)D was measured using the Elecsys® Vitamin D total test. A total of 226 patients with biopsy-positive sarcoidosis were analyzed. The average median value of serum vitamin D was 9.47 mg/L, suggesting severe deficiency. Statistically significant correlation was found in patients with chronic disease and low levels of serum vitamin 25(OH)D (Chi-Square=6.044; df=2; p=0.014). The patient group with vitamin D serum levels higher than 20 mg/L showed higher levels of the mean forced vital capacity (FVC) by 380 mL, and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) by 220 mL, when compared to the patient group with lower serum vitamin D. A statistically significant role was established for serum vitamin 25(OH)D levels as the predictor of fatigue (R2=0.878; p=0.038 (b=0.216)) and depression in patients with sarcoidosis (R2=0.80; p=0.000 (b=0.391)). The insufficiency of 25(OH)D seems to be an important factor in predicting the course of chronic disease, significant lung function impairments and cognitive failures such as fatigue and depression. The fact that the majority of the analyzed sarcoidosis patients had totally deficient serum 25(OH)D levels made this finding even more notable.

Due to the increasing use of immunosuppressants, particularly biological therapy, as well as HIV epidemics, latent tuberculosis (LTBI) is being activated, and this disease, which had been rather forgotten in the Western world, is becoming a topical issue in the recent years. Numerous categories of patients should be tested for latent tuberculosis, using PPD or IGRA tests. Interpreting test results is a very touchy issue, since it is the way to determine therapy of latent TB, that is, to decide on chemoprophylaxis. For the last two years, during the Covid-19 pandemics, large percentage of patients received high doses of corticosteroid and other types of immunosuppressant therapies, and it is therefore necessary to consider the potential risks for these patients, in terms of contracting tuberculosis and perhaps testing them for LTBI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The aim of the study was to determine the survival probability of critically ill patients with COVID-19 infection who needed mechanical ventilation and to determine the efficacy of Tocilizumab use. Methodology: The study was designed as a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients older than 18 years, treated in an intensive care unit. The criteria for admission to the intensive care unit was severe respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation. All patients received corticosteroid therapy (methylprednisolone 1-2 mg/kg). Tocilizumab was used at a dose of 8 mg/kg in patients with a severe form of the disease (onset, or developed ARDS), followed by cytokine storm (IL-6 ≥ 40 ng/L and CRP ≥ 50 mg/L). Results: 88 patients were included in the study. Intrahospital mortality was 48.86%. No statistically significant difference was observed between patients with and without tocilizumab therapy. In the group of patients in whom this therapy was applied, the values of intrahospital survival were 45.7%, while in the group without this therapy the probability of intrahospital survival was only 0.93%. The probability of survival in the group with noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NIV) was 94.7%, while in the group with invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) 0.78%. The duration of symptoms before hospitalization (RR-1.088 CI 1.025-1.155, p < 0.05), as well as the duration of IMV (RR-0.906 CI 0.841-0.976, p < 0.05), were shown to be an independent predictor of poor outcome. Conclusions: The mortality of patients with the most severe form of respiratory failure caused by COVID-19 infection remains high. Independent predictors of poor outcomes were needed for invasive mechanical ventilation and the duration of symptoms before hospitalization or late initiation of appropriate therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]