Search

Purpose The purpose of this review is to summarize the management of asthma in children and to highlight different guideline-based approaches. This review also discusses literature regarding the use of corticosteroids, both inhaled and systemic, as well as biologic agents, in asthma management. Summary Asthma is a common chronic respiratory condition in the pediatric population and has evolved into a highly patient-specific disease. Of the 2 main asthma guidelines, one developed by the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program was recently published as a focused update in 2020. The other, from the Global Initiative for Asthma, focuses on a global strategy for management and prevention, with the most recent update in 2023. Both reports discuss diagnosis, assessment, and treatment of asthma in adults and children. Treatment is designed as a stepwise approach in both reports, although there are key differences. This article focuses on gaps in these guidelines, including the use of bronchodilators and inhaled corticosteroids with single maintenance and reliever therapy and long-acting muscarinic antagonists in children. It also reviews treatment in children under 5 years of age, although recommendations are limited due to a lack of evidence in this age group. Finally, this review discusses considerations for emerging treatments, including biologics, for patients who are difficult to treat. Conclusion New treatment strategies and agents have emerged in the treatment of pediatric asthma. Pharmacists play a key role in providing education about, dispensing, and recommending the newest evidence-based treatment options for children. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Use of proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) is common among people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) both for the management of suspected GERD, as well as pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy augmentation. Despite their use, limited data exist to demonstrate a clinically significant impact of PPIs on key endpoints in pwCF. Furthermore, the advent of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator therapy may modify the need for use. These notions, coupled with the potential for adverse outcomes associated with long-term PPI use in pwCF, should facilitate re-evaluation of long-term PPI use in pwCF and promote potential deprescribing. Despite limited data on PPI deprescribing in pwCF, it intuitively mirrors the existing guidance in adults in the general population, but with added consideration given to tapering strategy, and monitoring for CF-specific outcomes such as nutritional and respiratory status. The development of a monitoring and re-initiation plan is key to reducing deprescribing inertia. This review aims to summarize the evidence that details the concern for long-term use of PPIs and provide CF clinicians with rationale and guidance on how to approach deprescribing in their practice., (© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Competing Interests: CONFLICT OF INTEREST None to declare.