Search

Background: Evidence on return to sport (RTS) criteria and timelines for pediatric patients with osteochondral (OCD) lesions of the foot and ankle is limited. Methods: This systematic review evaluated RTS criteria and outcomes in this population by querying PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, and SPORTDiscus up to 30 May 2024. Inclusion criteria were retrospective or prospective studies that examined pediatric patients with osteochondral lesions of the foot and ankle and gave outcomes or criteria regarding RTS. Results: Five observational studies (n = 168 patients; n = 180 OCD lesions; mean age: 14.19 ± 0.47 years; mean follow-up: 42 ± 174 months) were included. Two studies (40%) used time-based criteria for RTS, two studies (40%) used mixed criteria, and the final study (20%) used milestone-based criteria. Across the mixed and milestone criteria, physical therapy (n = 3) and minimal partial weight-bearing prior to RTS (n = 4) were most frequently seen as the milestones used for assessing RTS readiness. RTS from the postoperative period ranged from 3 months to 6 months. At the final follow-up, 61.45% of patients (n = 110) were available to provide information regarding their ability to RTS. Of these patients, 80% (n = 88) achieved RTS. Conclusions: Results showed variability in RTS criteria, ranging from three to six months, with no clear patterns. Most patients returned to sport, suggesting that such individualized criteria may be effective to an extent. Future research should focus on larger, high-quality studies to develop consistent RTS protocols.

The biomechanical efficacy of nail–plate constructs (NPCs) used in the treatment of traumatic distal femur fractures (DFFs) remains understudied compared to traditional approaches. This systematic review examines the biomechanical efficacy of NPCs compared to alternative approaches for the surgical fixation of DFFs to guide surgical decision-making and improve patient outcomes. This systematic review searched the PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and SPORT Discus databases from inception until 24 January 2024. Inclusion criteria were biomechanical studies that involved nail–plate combination constructs for DFFs. Six observational studies were included. Of the included studies, five studies utilized synthetic bone models in testing, and one study used both synthetic and cadaveric bone models. All studies found NPCs to have significantly higher axial and torsional stiffness and resistance to loading than distal lateral femoral locking plate (DLFLP) constructs. The 11 mm NPCs were significantly stiffer than the 9 mm NPCs under torsional and axial loading. Only one of two studies found NPCs to have greater axial stiffness than dual-plate (DP) constructs. NPCs and DP constructs had greater torsional and axial stiffness than the plate-only or DP with medial distal tibial plate constructs. NPCs had less displacement and torque than the plate- or nail-only constructs under axial and torsional loads. NPCs demonstrate superior axial and torsional stiffness and resistance to mechanical loads compared to DLFLP. The varying performance between 11 mm and 9 mm NPCs suggests that construct diameter plays a role in mechanical stability. NPCs and DP constructs performed better than plate-only constructs. Future research should explore the impact of varying nail diameters and plate configurations on stability, as well as the clinical efficacy of NPCs across different patient populations, particularly those with varying bone densities, to better understand their performance in real-world scenarios.

Background: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for treatment efficacy, but foot and ankle RCTs are often small or inconsistent. The Fragility Index (FI) evaluates the stability of significant findings. This study assessed the fragility of RCT outcomes for Achilles tendon pathology (ATP) interventions. Methods: This systematic review queried PubMed up to May 14, 2024, for RCTs on ATP interventions. RCTs with significant binary outcomes were included. Two reviewers assessed eligibility, extracted data, calculated FIs, and evaluated risk of bias. Frequency-weighted means were used for narrative synthesis. Results: Eleven RCTs with 4506 patients (mean cohort size: 409.64 ± 160.54) and a mean age of 36.97 ± 13.51 years (n = 4356; 96.67%) were included, covering 24 binary outcomes. The median FI across all outcomes was 3 (interquartile range 1-4; mean 3.92), indicating that changing the outcome of just a few patients could shift a study’s results from statistically significant to nonsignificant. Trials having an FI ≤3 comprised 58.33%. Three outcomes (12.5%) had an FI of zero after recalculating P values using the two-sided Fisher exact test. Half of the outcomes were robust. No RCT reported FIs or adjusted significance for multiple testing. Most studies (81.82%) performed 2 or more statistical tests, with an average of 30.81 ± 41.28 P values reported per study. The overall risk of bias was low in 1 study (9.09%) and moderate in 7 (63.64%). Most studies had low risk of bias in randomization (72.73%) and missing outcome data (90.91%). Conclusion: The FI assesses the fragility of statistically significant binary results, revealing that many ATP RCTs have fragile outcomes due to small sample sizes. A median FI of 3 means that changing the outcome of 3 patients could shift a study’s results from statistically significant to nonsignificant.