Search

Background: MEDI5395 is a recombinant attenuated Newcastle disease virus engineered to express a human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor transgene. Preclinically, MEDI5395 demonstrated broad oncolytic activity, augmented by concomitant programmed cell death-1/programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) axis blockade. Durvalumab is an anti-PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitor approved for the treatment of various solid tumors. We describe the results of the first-in-human study combining intravenous MEDI5395 with durvalumab in patients with advanced solid tumors., Methods: This phase I, open-label, multicenter, dose-escalation, dose-expansion study recruited adult patients with advanced solid tumors, who had relapsed or were refractory or intolerant to ≥1 prior line of standard treatment. MEDI5395 was administered intravenously as six doses over 15-18 days. The dose-escalation phase assessed four-dose levels (10 8 , 10 9 , 10 10 , 10 11 focus forming units (FFU)) of MEDI5395, with sequential or delayed durvalumab. Durvalumab 1500 mg was administered intravenously every 4 weeks up to 2 years. The dose-expansion phase was not initiated. The primary objectives were to evaluate safety and tolerability, dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and the dose and schedule of MEDI5395 plus durvalumab administration. Secondary objectives included the assessment of the efficacy, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and immunogenicity of MEDI5395., Results: 39 patients were treated with MEDI5395; 36 patients also received durvalumab. All 39 patients experienced ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE), most commonly fatigue (61.5%), nausea (53.8%) and chills (51.3%). Grade 3-4 TEAEs occurred in 27 (69.2%) patients; these were deemed MEDI5395-related in 12 (30.8%) patients. Two patients experienced a DLT, and the maximum tolerated dose of MEDI5395 with sequential and delayed durvalumab at study termination was 10 11 and 10 10 FFU, respectively. Four patients (10.3%) achieved a partial response (PR). Patients with PR or stable disease tended to have higher baseline PD-L1 and CD8+ levels in their tumor tissue. A tendency to dose-dependent pharmacokinetics of the viral genome was observed in whole blood and a tendency to dose-dependent viral shedding was observed in saliva and urine. Neutralizing antibodies were observed in all patients but did not appear to impact efficacy negatively., Conclusion: This study demonstrates the feasibility, safety and preliminary efficacy of MEDI5395 with durvalumab in patients with advanced solid tumors., Trial Registration Number: NCT03889275., Competing Interests: Competing interests: DD reports Grants/Research Support (institutional) from Arcus, CellSight Technologies, Immunocore, Merck, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Tesaro/GSK; Consultant fees from ACM Bio, Ascendis Pharma, Clinical Care Options (CCO), Gerson Lehrman Group (GLG), Merck, Medical Learning Group (MLG), Xilio Therapeutics. CE Speakers’ Bureau from Castle Biosciences; reports Intellectual Property for US Patent 63/124,231, “Compositions and Methods for Treating Cancer”, December 11, 2020; US Patent 63/208,719, “Compositions and Methods For Responsiveness to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICI), Increasing Effectiveness of ICI and Treating Cancer”, June 9, 2021. BAC reports Institutional Research Support from AstraZeneca, AbbVie, Actuate Therapeutics, Astellas, Agenus, Bayer, Dragonfly Therapeutics, Mink Therapeutics, Pfizer, Pyxis Oncology, Repare Therapeutics, Regeneron; Advisory Boards for Seattle Genetics. GKD reports Consulting Fee from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Meru, Mirati, Novartis, Regeneron. SS reports Employment from University of North Carolina; Honoraria from Naveris, Exelixis, Eisai, Medscape, Association of Community Cancer Centers; Consulting fees from Exelixis. Grants or Funds from Merck, AstraZeneca, Exelixis, Regeneron, Inovio, ASCO. MJB reports Grants, Funds, Trial support to institution (Mayo Clinic). KJH reports Scientific Advisory Board Membership for Oncolys, PsiVac, Replimune (paid to institution); Consulting Fees for PsiVac, Replimune, VacV (paid to institution); Grants or Funds from Replimune (paid to institution). SPP reports Consulting Fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Certis, Eli Lilly, Jazz, Genentech, Illumina, Merck, Pfizer, Signatera, Tempus; Grants or Funds (research funding to university) from Amgen, AstraZeneca, A2bio, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Fate Therapeutics, Gilead, Iovance, Merck, Pfizer, Roche/Genentech. EG reports Consulting Fee from Kiyatec (personal compensation), Karyopharm Therapeutics (Data Safety Monitoring Board, compensation to employer), Boston Scientific (Data Monitoring Committee, compensation to employer), Servier Pharmaceuticals (Advisory Board, compensation to employer), Boehringer Ingelheim (Advisory Board, compensation to employer); Grants or Funds from Servier Pharmaceuticals (formerly Agios Pharmaceuticals), Denovo Biopharma, Celgene, MedImmune. AS reports Consulting fees from Roche and Chugai; Academic grants from Replimune, Histosonics, Oncolytics Biotech, Transgene (all paid to institution). SA: AstraZeneca employee and stock holder. ZC reports no potential conflict of interest. CF: AstraZeneca employee and stock holder. MG: AstraZeneca employee and stock holder. JBu: AstraZeneca employee and stock holder. ET: AstraZeneca employee and stock holder. ND: AstraZeneca employee and stock holder. KL: AstraZeneca employee and stock holder. FA: AstraZeneca employee and stock holder. DZ reports Institutional Grants from Merck, Genentech, AstraZeneca, Plexxikon, and Synthekine; Personal Fees; AstraZeneca, Xencor, Memgen, Takeda, Synthekine, Immunos, Tessa Therapeutics, Miltenyi, and Calidi Biotherapeutics. DZ is a holder of a patent on use of oncolytic NDV for cancer therapy (unrelated to the agent under study)., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Oncolytic viruses (OV) are designed to selectively infect and kill cancer cells, while simultaneously eliciting antitumour immunity. The mechanism is expected to originate from infected cancer cells. However, recent reports of tumour regression unaccompanied by cancer cell infection suggest a more complex mechanism of action. Here, we engineered vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) ΔM51 -sensitive and VSV ΔM51 -resistant tumour lines to elucidate the role of OV-infected cancer and non-cancer cells. We found that, while cancer cell infections elicit oncolysis and antitumour immunity as expected, infection of non-cancer cells alone can also contribute to tumour regression. This effect is partly attributed to the systemic production of cytokines that promote dendritic cell (DC) activation, migration and antigen cross-presentation, leading to magnified antitumour CD8 + T cell activation and tumour regression. Such OV-induced antitumour immunity is complementary to PD-1 blockade. Overall, our results reveal mechanistic insights into OV-induced antitumour immunity that can be leveraged to improve OV-based therapeutics., Competing Interests: Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: A limitation of approved oncolytic viruses is their requirement for intratumoral (i.t.) injection. TILT-123 (igrelimogene litadenorepvec, Ad5/3-E2F-D24-hTNFα-IRES-hIL-2) is a chimeric oncolytic adenovirus suitable for intravenous (i.v.) delivery due to its capsid modification and dual selectivity devices. It is armed with tumor necrosis alpha and interleukin-2 for promoting T-cell activation and lymphocyte trafficking to tumors, thereby enhancing the antitumor immune response. Here, we present the findings after a single i.v. administration of TILT-123 in three phase I dose escalation clinical trials., Methods: Patients with advanced solid tumors initially received a single i.v. dose of TILT-123 ranging from 3 × 10 9 to 4 × 10 12 viral particles (VP). Blood was collected at baseline, 1, 16, and 192 h (7 days) post-treatment for bioavailability and serum analysis. Tumor biopsies were collected prior to treatment and 7 days post-treatment for analysis of viral presence and immunological effects. Patients did not receive any other cancer therapies during this period., Results: Across all three trials (TUNIMO, TUNINTIL, and PROTA), 52 total patients were treated with i.v. TILT-123. Overall, TILT-123 was found to be well-tolerated, with no dose-limiting toxicities observed. Post-treatment tumor biopsies showed expression of viral genes, presence of TILT-123 adenovirus proteins or DNA, and changes in immune cell infiltration from baseline. Increased virus dose did not lead to increased virus detection in tumors. Median overall survival was longer in patients with confirmed presence of TILT-123 in post-treatment biopsies (280 versus 190 days, p = 0.0405)., Conclusion: TILT-123 demonstrated safety and significant intratumoral immunomodulation following a single i.v. administration, warranting further investigation., Trial Registrations: TUNIMO-NCT04695327. Registered 4 January 2021, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04695327 . TUNINTIL-NCT04217473. Registered 19 December 2019, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04217473 . PROTA-NCT05271318. Registered 4 February 2022, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05271318 ., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Dendritic cells (DCs) are crucial in cancer immunity, because they activate cytotoxic T cells by presenting tumor antigens. Recently, oncolytic virus therapy has been recognized as a systemic immune stimulator. We previously developed a telomerase-specific oncolytic adenovirus (OBP-301) and a p53-armed OBP-301 (OBP-702), demonstrating that these viruses strongly activate systemic antitumor immunity. However, their effects on DCs remained unclear. In the present study, the aim was to elucidate the mechanisms of DC activation by OBP-702, focusing particularly on tumor-derived exosomes. Exosomes (Exo53, Exo301, or Exo702) were isolated from conditioned media of human or murine pancreatic cancer cell lines (Panc-1, MiaPaCa-2, and PAN02) after treatment with Ad-p53, OBP-301, or OBP-702. Exo702 derived from Panc-1 and MiaPaCa-2 cells significantly upregulated CD86, CD80, CD83 (markers of DC maturation), and IFN-γ in DCs in vitro. Similarly, Exo702 derived from PAN02 cells upregulated CD86 and IFN-γ in bone marrow-derived DCs in a bilateral PAN02 subcutaneous tumor model. This DC maturation was inhibited by GW4869, an inhibitor of exosome release, and anti-CD63, an antibody targeting the exosome marker. Intratumoral injection of OBP-702 into PAN02 subcutaneous tumors significantly increased the presence of mature DCs and CD8-positive T cells in draining lymph nodes, leading to long-lasting antitumor effects through the durable activation of systemic antitumor immunity. In conclusion, tumor-derived exosomes play a significant role in DC maturation following OBP-702 treatment and are critical for the systemic activation of antitumor immunity, leading to the abscopal effect., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Oncolytic adenoviruses (oADV) are promising cancer treatment agents. However, in vivo hepatic sequestration and the host immunologic response against the agents limit the therapeutic potential of oADVs. In this study, we present a combined method with a rational design for improving oADV infection efficiency, immunogenicity, and treatment efficacy by self-biomineralization. We integrated the biomimetic nucleopeptide W6p into the capsid of oADV using reverse genetics, allowing calcium phosphate mineralization to be biologically induced on the surface of oADV under physiologic conditions, resulting in a mineral exterior. This self-biomineralized, modified oADV (oADV-W6-CaP) enhanced infection efficiency and therapeutic efficacy in coxsackievirus and adenovirus receptor (CAR)-negative cancer cells wherein protecting them against neutralization by preexisting neutralizing antibodies. In subcutaneous mouse tumor models, systemic injection of oADV-W6-CaP demonstrated improved antitumor effectiveness, which was associated with increased T-cell infiltration and CD8+ T-cell activation. In addition, the anticancer immune response elicited by oADV-W6-CaP was dependent on CD8+ T cells, which mediated long-term immunologic memory and systemic antitumor immunity against the same tumor. Finally, the addition of PD1 or CD47 inhibition boosted the anticancer effects of oADV-W6-CaP and increased the rate of complete tumor clearance in tumor-bearing animals. The self-biomineralized oADV shifted the suppressive tumor microenvironment from a "cold" to "hot" state and synergized with immune checkpoint blockade to exert outstanding tumoricidal effects, demonstrating promising potential for cancer immunotherapy., (©2024 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common CNS cancer, it has dismal survival rates despite several effective mediators: intensified cytotoxic therapy, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy, viral therapy, adoptive cell therapy, immune checkpoint blockade therapy, radiation therapy and vaccine therapy. This review examines the basic concepts underlying immune targeting and examines products such as checkpoint blockade drugs, CAR-T cells, oncolytic viruses, combinatory multimodal immunotherapy and cancer vaccines. New approaches to overcoming current constraints and challenges in GBM therapy are discussed, based on recent studies into these tactics, findings from ongoing clinical trials, as well as previous trial results., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Single agent immune checkpoint inhibitors have been ineffective for patients with advanced stage and recurrent high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC). Using pre-clinical models of HGSOC, we evaluated the anti-tumor and immune stimulatory effects of an oncolytic adenovirus, MEM-288. This conditionally replicative virus encodes a modified membrane stable CD40L and IFNβ. We demonstrated this virus successfully infects HGSOC cell lines and primary human ascites samples in vitro. We evaluated the anti-tumor and immunostimulatory activity in vivo in immune competent mouse models. Intraperitoneal delivery of MEM-288 decreased ascites and solid tumor burden compared to controls, and treatment generated a systemic anti-tumor immune response. The tumor microenvironment had a higher proportion of anti-tumor macrophages and decreased markers of angiogenesis. MEM-288 is a promising immunotherapy agent in HGSOC, with further pre-clinical studies required to understand the mechanism of action in the peritoneal microenvironment and clinical activity in combination with other therapies., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Mark Cantwell is an employee, stock owner of Memgen, Inc and has a patent on MEM-288., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Oncolytic virotherapy represents an innovative and promising approach for the treatment of cancer, including multiple myeloma (MM), a currently incurable plasma cell (PC) neoplasm. Despite the advances that new therapies, particularly immunotherapy, have been made, relapses still occur in MM patients, highlighting the medical need for new treatment options. Oncolytic viruses (OVs) preferentially infect and destroy cancer cells, exerting a direct and/or indirect cytopathic effect, combined with a modulation of the tumor microenvironment leading to an activation of the immune system. Both naturally occurring and genetically modified viruses have demonstrated significant preclinical effects against MM cells. Currently, the OVs genetically modified measles virus strains, reovirus, and vesicular stomatitis virus are employed in clinical trials for MM. Nevertheless, significant challenges remain, including the efficiency of the virus delivery to the tumor, overcoming antiviral immune responses, and the specificity of the virus for MM cells. Different strategies are being explored to optimize OV therapy, including combining it with standard treatments and targeted therapies to enhance efficacy. This review will provide a comprehensive analysis of the mechanism of action of the different OVs, and preclinical and clinical evidence, focusing on the role of oncolytic virotherapy as a new possible immunotherapeutic approach also in combination with the current therapeutic armamentarium and underlying the future directions in the context of MM treatments., Competing Interests: NG received research funding and honoraria from Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Takeda, Celgene, Millennium Pharmaceuticals, and Janssen Pharmaceuticals. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision., (Copyright © 2024 Raimondi, Vescovini, Dessena, Donofrio, Storti and Giuliani.)

Adoptive immunotherapy with T cells, genetically modified to express a tumor-reactive chimeric antigen receptor (CAR), is an innovative and rapidly developing life-saving treatment for cancer patients without other therapeutic opportunities. CAR-T cell therapy has proven effective only in hematological malignancies. However, although by now only a few clinical trials had promising outcomes, we predict that CAR-T therapy will eventually become an established treatment for several solid tumors. Oncolytic viruses (OVs) can selectively replicate in and kill cancer cells without harming healthy cells. They can stimulate an immune response against the tumor, because OVs potentially stimulate adaptive immunity and innate components of the host immune system. Using CAR-T cells along with oncolytic viruses may enhance the efficacy of CAR-T cell therapy in destroying solid tumors by increasing the tumor penetrance of T cells and reducing the immune suppression by the tumor microenvironment. This review describes recent advances in the design of oncolytic viruses and CAR-T cells while providing an overview of the potential combination of oncolytic virotherapy with CAR-T cells for solid cancers. In this review, we will focus on the host-virus interaction in the tumor microenvironment to reverse local immunosuppression and to develop CAR-T cell effector function., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision., (Copyright © 2024 Ponterio, Haas and De Maria.)

The route of oncolytic virotherapy is pivotal for immunotherapeutic efficacy in advanced cancers. In this preclinical study, an oncolytic reovirus (RC402) is orally administered to induce antitumor immunity. Oral reovirus treatment shows no gross toxicities and effectively suppresses multifocal tumor lesions. Orally administered reovirus interacts with the host immune system in the Peyer's patch of the terminal ileum, increases IgA + antibody-secreting cells in the lamina propria through MAdCAM-1 + blood vessels, and reshapes the gut microbiome. Oral reovirus promotes antigen presentation, type I/II interferons, and T cell activation within distant tumors, but does not reach or directly infect tumor cells beyond the gastrointestinal tract. In contrast to intratumoral reovirus injection, the presence of the gut microbiome, Batf3 + dendritic cells, type I interferons, and CD8 + T cells are indispensable for orally administered reovirus-induced antitumor immunity. Oral reovirus treatment is most effective when combined with αPD-1(L1) and/or αCTLA-4, leading to complete colon tumor regression and protective immune memory. Collectively, oral reovirus virotherapy is a feasible and effective immunotherapeutic strategy in preclinical studies., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Gastric cancer (GC) is a leading malignant disease in numerous countries, including Taiwan with limited therapeutic options. Animal viruses including oncolytic avian reovirus (ARV) have the possibility to avoid pre-existing immunity in humans, while being safe and immunostimulatory. Here, we provide a novel insight into oncolytic ARV and UV-ARV-sensitized patient's peripheral blood mononuclear cells (P-PBMCs) and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) killing primary GC (PGC) cells through the surface TLR3 and TRAIL/DR4/DR5 immunogenic apoptosis pathway., Methods: We conducted a comprehensive study to reveal whether ARV- or UV-inactivated ARV (UV-ARV)-modulated P-PBMCs or TILs killing ARV- and UV-ARV-sensitized AGS cells and PGC cells derived from clinical patients and to investigate the regulation of surface TLR3 receptor and upstream signaling pathways. Apoptosis analysis by flow cytometry and Western blot, suppression of signal pathway by specific inhibitors, in situ proximity ligation assay (PLA), time-resolved flurometry and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) cytotoxicity assays, and an in vitro co-culture model were established to study the interplay between ARV- and UV-ARV-sensitized P-PBMCs and TILs to kill PGC cells and their upstream pathways., Results: Our results reveal that increased levels of DR4 and DR5 were observed in ARV and UV-ARV sensitized PGC cells through the TLR3/p38/p53 signaling pathway. Importantly, we found that the σC protein of ARV or UV-ARV interacted with surface TLR3 of CD8 + TILs, thereby triggering the TLR3/NF-κB/IFN-γ/TRAIL signaling pathway which induces immunogenic apoptosis of PGC cells. This study sheds further light on the molecular basis behind ARV oncolysis and facilitates the ARV or UV-ARV as a cancer therapeutic., Conclusions: The study provides novel insights into ARV- or UV-ARV-sensitized P-PBMCs and CD8 + TILs to kill PGC cells through the immunogenic apoptosis pathway. We conclude that P-PBMCs can easily be obtained from GC patients and provide a rich source as TILs to kill PGC cells., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Although impactful scientific advancements have recently been made in cancer therapy, there remains an opportunity for future improvements. Immunotherapy is perhaps one of the most cutting-edge categories of therapies demonstrating potential in the clinical setting. Genetically engineered T cells express chimeric antigen receptors (CARs), which can detect signals expressed by the molecules present on the surface of cancer cells, also called tumor-associated antigens (TAAs). Their effectiveness has been extensively demonstrated in hematological cancers; therefore, these results can establish the groundwork for their applications on a wide range of requirements. However, the application of CAR-T cell technology for solid tumors has several challenges, such as the existence of an immune-suppressing tumor microenvironment and/or inadequate tumor infiltration. Consequently, combining therapies such as CAR-T cell technology with other approaches has been proposed. The effectiveness of combining CAR-T cell with oncolytic virus therapy, with either genetically altered or naturally occurring viruses, to target tumor cells is currently under investigation, with several clinical trials being conducted. This narrative review summarizes the current advancements, opportunities, benefits, and limitations in using each therapy alone and their combination. The use of oncolytic viruses offers an opportunity to address the existing challenges of CAR-T cell therapy, which appear in the process of trying to overcome solid tumors, through the combination of their strengths. Additionally, utilizing oncolytic viruses allows researchers to modify the virus, thus enabling the targeted delivery of specific therapeutic agents within the tumor environment. This, in turn, can potentially enhance the cytotoxic effect and therapeutic potential of CAR-T cell technology on solid malignancies, with impactful results in the clinical setting.

Although oncolytic adenoviruses are widely studied for their direct oncolytic activity and immunomodulatory role in cancer immunotherapy, the immunosuppressive feedback loop induced by oncolytic adenoviruses remains to be studied. Here, we demonstrate that type V adenovirus (ADV) induces the polarization of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) to the M2 phenotype and increases the infiltration of regulatory T cells (Tregs) in the tumor microenvironment (TME). By selectively compensating for these deficiencies, thymosin alpha 1 (Tα1) reprograms "M2-like" TAMs toward an antitumoral phenotype, thereby reprogramming the TME into a state more beneficial for antitumor immunity. Moreover, ADV Tα1 is constructed by harnessing the merits of all the components for the aforementioned combinatorial therapy. Both exogenously supplied and adenovirus-produced Tα1 orchestrate TAM reprogramming and enhance the antitumor efficacy of ADV via CD8 + T cells, showing promising prospects for clinical translation. Our findings provide inspiration for improving oncolytic adenovirus combination therapy and designing oncolytic engineered adenoviruses., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests K.L., J.W., C.J., L.K., H.C., X.G., and Q.X. are named as inventors on China patent application (no. 2024110168233), which is related to this work. Jinan Microecological Biomedicine Shandong Laboratory and Nanjing University are the applicants of this patent application. X.G. and Q.X. are employees of Jinan Microecological Biomedicine Shandong Laboratory. J.W. and C.J. are employees of Nanjing University., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Tumor immunotherapy, especially immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), has been applied in clinical practice, but low response to immune therapies remains a thorny issue. Oncolytic viruses (OVs) are considered promising for cancer treatment because they can selectively target and destroy tumor cells followed by spreading to nearby tumor tissues for a new round of infection. Immunogenic cell death (ICD), which is the major mechanism of OVs' anticancer effects, is induced by endoplasmic reticulum stress and reactive oxygen species overload after virus infection. Subsequent release of specific damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) from different types of tumor cells can transform the tumor microenvironment from "cold" to "hot". In this paper, we broadly define ICD as those types of cell death that is immunogenic, and describe their signaling pathways respectively. Focusing on ICD, we also elucidate the advantages and disadvantages of recent combination therapies and their future prospects., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest All authors declare no competing interests. Figures were partly created by Figdraw (www.figdraw.com)., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Oncolytic virotherapy is emerging as a promising therapeutic avenue for cancer treatment, harnessing both innate and tumor-specific immune responses for targeted tumor elimination. In this study, we present a novel oncolytic virus (oHSV1-IL15B) derived from herpes simplex virus-1 (HSV-1), armed with IL-15/IL-15Rα complex, with a focus on treating colon cancer combined with oncolytic HSV-1 expressing anti-PD-1 antibody (oHSV1-aPD1). Results from our study reveal that recombinant oHSV-1 virus equipped with IL-15/IL-15Rα complex exhibited significant anti-tumor effects in a murine CT26 colon adenocarcinoma model. Notably, oHSV1-IL15B combined with oHSV-1-aPD1 demonstrates superior tumor inhibition and prolonged overall survival compared to oHSV1-mock and monotherapy groups. Further exploration highlights the impact of oHSV1-IL15B, oHSV-1-aPD1 and combined group on antitumor capacity, revealing a substantial increase in CD8 + T and CD4 + T cell proportions of CT26-bearing BALB/c mice and promoting apoptosis in tumor tissue. The study emphasizes the pivotal role of cytotoxic CD8 + T cells in oncolytic virotherapy, demonstrating that recombinant oHSV1-IL15B combined with oncolytic HSV-1-aPD1 induces a robust tumor-specific T cell response. RNA sequence analysis highlighted oHSV1-IL15B combined with oHSV1-aPD1 improved tumors immune microenvironment on immune response, antiviral response-related genes and apoptosis-related genes, which contributed to anti-tumor immunotherapy. The findings underscore the promising antitumor activity achieved through the combination of IL-15/IL-15Rα complex and anti-PD-1 antibody with oHSV-1. This research opens avenues for diverse therapeutic strategies, suggesting the potential of synergistically utilizing cytokines and anti-PD-1 antibody with oncolytic viruses to enhance immunotherapy for cancer management., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Lung cancer accounts for the highest cancer-related mortality worldwide. While immunotherapies targeting anti-tumor immune responses have demonstrated efficacy in clinical practice, the demand for novel treatment modalities remains urgent. Oncolytic viruses (OVs), which selectively kill tumor cells while stimulating an anti-tumor immune response, represent a potential breakthrough in lung cancer therapy. The induction of anti-tumor immunity by OVs is central to their overall therapeutic effectiveness. Many natural receptors on the surface of cancer cells are dysregulated, providing potential entry points for OVs. Furthermore, the inherent dysregulation of some key signaling pathways in lung cancer cells promotes proliferation, progression and metastasis, which may facilitate selective viral replication. In this review, we explore the application of OVs in lung cancer by analyzing several major OVs and their corresponding entry receptors. Then, we also examine the key signaling pathways and molecules with the potential to synergize with OVs in modulating the immune tumor microenvironment. Finally, we discuss the combination and administration strategies that warrant further clinical trials for validation. Despite certain limitations, the tolerability of OVs positions virotherapy as a promising avenue in the future of lung cancer treatment., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Dong, Luo, He, Zhang, Zeng and Chen.)

Oncolytic virus (OV) is increasingly being recognized as a novel vector in cancer immunotherapy. Increasing evidence suggests that OV has the ability to change the immune status of tumor microenvironment, so called transformation of 'cold' tumors into 'hot' tumors. The improved anti-tumor immunity can be induced by OV and further enhanced through the combination of various immunomodulators. The Neo-2/15 is a newly de novo synthesized cytokine that functions as both IL-2 and IL-15. However, it specifically lacks the binding site of IL-2 receptor α subunit (CD25), therefore unable to induce the Treg proliferation. In present study, a recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus expressing the Neo-2/15 (VSV M51R -Neo-2/15) was generated. Intratumoral delivery of VSV M51R -Neo-2/15 efficiently inhibited tumor growth in mice without causing the IL-2-related toxicity previously observed in clinic. Moreover, treatment with VSV M51R -Neo-2/15 increased the number of activated CD8 + T cells but not Treg cells in tumors. More tumor-bearing mice were survival with VSV M51R -Neo-2/15 treatment, and the surviving mice displayed enhanced protection against tumor cell rechallenge due to the induced anti-tumor immunity. In addition, combination therapy of OV and anti-PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors further enhanced the anti-tumor immune response. These findings suggest that our novel VSV M51R -Neo-2/15 can effectively inhibit the tumor growth and enhance the sensitivity to immune checkpoint inhibitors, providing promising attempts for further clinical trials., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Reovirus (Reo) has shown promising potential in specifically killing tumor cells, and offering new possibilities for ovarian cancer (OC) treatment. However, neutralizing antibodies in the ascites from OC patients greatly limit the further application of Reo. In this study, we employed cationic liposomes (Lipo) to deliver Reo, significantly enhancing its ability to enter OC cells and its effectiveness in killing these cells under ascitic conditions. Pre-treatment with the MβCD inhibitor notably decreased Reo-mediated tumor cell death, indicating that Lipo primarily enables Reo's cellular uptake through caveolin-mediated endocytosis. Our results demonstrate that Lipo effectively facilitates the entry of Reo into the cytoplasm and triggers cell apoptosis. The above findings provide a new strategy to overcome the obstacle of neutralizing antibodies in the clinical application of Reo., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Immunotherapy has emerged as a promising approach for cancer treatment, with oncolytic adenoviruses showing power as immunotherapeutic agents. In this study, we investigated the immunotherapeutic potential of an adenovirus construct expressing CXCL9, CXCL10, or IL-15 in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) tumor models. Our results demonstrated robust cytokine secretion upon viral treatment, suggesting effective transgene expression. Subsequent analysis using resistance-based transwell migration and microfluidic chip assays demonstrated increased T-cell migration in response to chemokine secretion by infected cells in both 2D and 3D cell models. Flow cytometry analysis revealed CXCR3 receptor expression across T-cell subsets, with the highest percentage found on CD8+ T-cells, underscoring their key role in immune cell migration. Alongside T-cells, we also detected NK-cells in the tumors of immunocompromised mice treated with cytokine-encoding adenoviruses. Furthermore, we identified potential immunogenic antigens that may enhance the efficacy and specificity of our armed oncolytic adenoviruses in ccRCC. Overall, our findings using ccRCC cell line, in vivo humanized mice, physiologically relevant PDCs in 2D and patient-derived organoids (PDOs) in 3D suggest that chemokine-armed adenoviruses hold promise for enhancing T-cell migration and improving immunotherapy outcomes in ccRCC. Our study contributes to the development of more effective ccRCC treatment strategies by elucidating immune cell infiltration and activation mechanisms within the tumor microenvironment (TME) and highlights the usefulness of PDOs for predicting clinical relevance and validating novel immunotherapeutic approaches. Overall, our research offers insights into the rational design and optimization of viral-based immunotherapies for ccRCC., Competing Interests: Oncolytic viruses encoding for cytokines CXCL9, CXCL10 and IL-15 have been licensed to Ximbio/CancerTools.org for commercialization to other academic or commercial researchers. V.S. is currently employed by AstraZeneca. V.C is a co-founder and shareholder at VALO Therapeutics. Other authors report there are no competing interests to declare., (© 2024 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.)

Pancreatic cancer presents formidable challenges due to rapid progression and resistance to conventional treatments. Oncolytic viruses (OVs) selectively infect cancer cells and cause cancer cells to lyse, releasing molecules that can be identified by the host's immune system. Moreover, OV can carry immune-stimulatory payloads such as interleukin-12, which when delivered locally can enhance immune system-mediated tumor killing. OVs are very well tolerated by cancer patients due to their ability to selectively target tumors without affecting surrounding normal tissues. OVs have recently been combined with other therapies, including chemotherapy and immunotherapy, to improve clinical outcomes. Several OVs including adenovirus, herpes simplex viruses (HSVs), vaccinia virus, parvovirus, reovirus, and measles virus have been evaluated in preclinical and clinical settings for the treatment of pancreatic cancer. We evaluated the safety and tolerability of a replication-competent oncolytic adenoviral vector carrying two suicide genes (thymidine kinase, TK; and cytosine deaminase, CD) and human interleukin-12 (hIL12) in metastatic pancreatic cancer patients in a phase 1 trial. This vector was found to be safe and well-tolerated at the highest doses tested without causing any significant adverse events (SAEs). Moreover, long-term follow-up studies indicated an increase in the overall survival (OS) in subjects receiving the highest dose of the OV. Our encouraging long-term survival data provide hope for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer, a disease that has not seen a meaningful increase in OS in the last five decades. In this review article, we highlight several preclinical and clinical studies and discuss future directions for optimizing OV therapy in pancreatic cancer. We envision OV-based gene therapy to be a game changer in the near future with the advent of newer generation OVs that have higher specificity and selectivity combined with personalized treatment plans developed under AI guidance.

Background: Neuroblastoma is the most common extracranial solid tumor in children and accounts for 15% of pediatric cancer related deaths. Targeting neuroblastoma with immunotherapies has proven challenging due to a paucity of immune cells in the tumor microenvironment and the release of immunosuppressive cytokines by neuroblastoma tumor cells. We hypothesized that combining an oncolytic Herpes Simplex Virus (oHSV) with natural killer (NK) cells might overcome these barriers and incite tumor cell death., Methods: We utilized MYCN amplified and non-amplified neuroblastoma cell lines, the IL-12 expressing oHSV, M002, and the human NK cell line, NK-92 MI. We assessed the cytotoxicity of NK cells against neuroblastoma with and without M002 infection, the effects of M002 on NK cell priming, and the impact of M002 and priming on the migratory capacity and CD107a expression of NK cells. To test clinical applicability, we then investigated the effects of M002 and NK cells on neuroblastoma in vivo., Results: NK cells were more attracted to neuroblastoma cells that were infected with M002. There was an increase in neuroblastoma cell death with the combination treatment of M002 and NK cells both in vitro and in vivo. Priming the NK cells enhanced their cytotoxicity, migratory capacity and CD107a expression., Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, these investigations are the first to demonstrate the effects of an oncolytic virus combined with self-maintaining NK cells in neuroblastoma and the priming effect of neuroblastoma on NK cells. The current studies provide a deeper understanding of the relation between NK cells and neuroblastoma and these data suggest that oHSV increases NK cell cytotoxicity towards neuroblastoma., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Oncolytic virotherapy or immunovirotherapy is a strategy that utilizes viruses to selectively infect and kill tumor cells while also stimulating an immune response against the tumor. Early clinical trials in both pediatric and adult patients using oncolytic herpes simplex viruses (oHSV) have demonstrated safety and promising efficacy; however, combinatorial strategies designed to enhance oncolysis while also promoting durable T-cell responses for sustaining disease remission are likely required. We hypothesized that combining the direct tumor cell killing and innate immune stimulation by oHSV with a vaccine that promotes T cell-mediated immunity may lead to more durable tumor regression. To this end, we investigated the preclinical efficacy and potential synergy of combining oHSV with a self-assembling nanoparticle vaccine codelivering peptide antigens and Toll-like receptor 7 and 8 agonists (referred to as SNAPvax),which induces robust tumor-specific T-cell immunity. We then assessed how timing of the treatments (i.e., vaccine before or after oHSV) impacts T-cell responses, viral replication, and preclinical efficacy. The sequence of treatments was critical, as survival was significantly enhanced when the SNAPvax vaccine was given prior to oHSV. Increased clinical efficacy was associated with reduced tumor volume and increases in virus replication and tumor antigen-specific CD8+ T cells. These findings substantiate the criticality of combination immunotherapy timing and provide preclinical support for combining SNAPvax with oHSV as a promising treatment approach for both pediatric and adult tumors., (©2024 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Competing Interests: Declaration of interests The authors declare no competing interests.

T cell-focused cancer immunotherapy including checkpoint inhibitors and cell therapies has been rapidly evolving over the past decade. Nevertheless, there remains a major unmet medical need in oncology generally and immuno-oncology specifically. We have constructed an oncolytic adenovirus, Ad5/3-E2F-d24-aMUC1aCD3-IL-2 (TILT-322), which is armed with a human aMUC1aCD3 T cell engager and IL-2. TILT-322 treatment stimulated T cell cytotoxicity through the increased presence of granzyme B, perforin, and interferon-gamma. Additional immune profiling indicated TILT-322 increased gamma delta T cell activation and impacted other cell types such as natural killer cells and natural killer-like T cells that are traditionally involved in cancer immunotherapy. TILT-322 treatment also decreased the proportion of exhausted CD8 + T cells as demarked by immune checkpoint expression in ovarian ascites samples. Overall, our data showed that TILT-322 treatment led to an enhanced T cell activation and reversed T cell exhaustion translating into high antitumor efficacy when given locally or intravenously. The analysis of blood and tumors isolated from an in vivo patient-derived ovarian cancer xenograft model suggested TILT-322 mediated tumor control through improved T cell functions. Therefore, TILT-322 is a promising novel anti-tumor agent for clinical translation., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests A.H. is a shareholder of Circio Holdings ASA. (Norway). A.H., J.C., J.M.S., and D.Q. are employees and shareholders of TILT Biotherapeutics, Ltd., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Oncolytic viruses (OVs) represent a novel class of cancer immunotherapy agents that preferentially infect and kill cancer cells and promote protective antitumor immunity. Furthermore, OVs can be used in combination with established or upcoming immunotherapeutic agents, especially immune checkpoint inhibitors, to efficiently target a wide range of malignancies. The development of OV-based therapy involves three major steps before clinical evaluation: design, production and preclinical testing. OVs can be designed as natural or engineered strains and subsequently selected for their ability to kill a broad spectrum of cancer cells rather than normal, healthy cells. OV selection is further influenced by multiple factors, such as the availability of a specific viral platform, cancer cell permissivity, the need for genetic engineering to render the virus non-pathogenic and/or more effective and logistical considerations around the use of OVs within the laboratory or clinical setting. Selected OVs are then produced and tested for their anticancer potential by using syngeneic, xenograft or humanized preclinical models wherein immunocompromised and immunocompetent setups are used to elucidate their direct oncolytic ability as well as indirect immunotherapeutic potential in vivo. Finally, OVs demonstrating the desired anticancer potential progress toward translation in patients with cancer. This tutorial provides guidelines for the design, production and preclinical testing of OVs, emphasizing considerations specific to OV technology that determine their clinical utility as cancer immunotherapy agents., (© 2024. Springer Nature Limited.)

Despite advances in cancer therapies, glioblastoma (GBM) remains the most resistant and recurrent tumor in the central nervous system. GBM tumor microenvironment (TME) is a highly dynamic landscape consistent with alteration in tumor infiltration cells, playing a critical role in tumor progression and invasion. In addition, glioma stem cells (GSCs) with self-renewal capability promote tumor recurrence and induce therapy resistance, which all have complicated eradication of GBM with existing therapies. Oncolytic virotherapy is a promising field of therapy that can kill tumor cells in a targeted manner. Manipulated oncolytic viruses (OVs) improve cancer immunotherapy by directly lysis tumor cells, infiltrating antitumor cells, inducing immunogenic cell death, and sensitizing immune-resistant TME to an immune-responsive hot state. Importantly, OVs can target stemness-driven GBM progression. In this review, we will discuss how OVs as a therapeutic option target GBM, especially the GSC subpopulation, and induce immunogenicity to remodel the TME, which subsequently enhances immunotherapies' efficiency., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that the research was conducted without any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Oncolytic viruses, defined as viruses capable of lysing cancer cells, emerged as a groundbreaking class of therapeutic entities poised to revolutionize cancer treatment. Their mode of action encompasses both direct tumor cell lysis and the indirect enhancement of anti-tumor immune responses. Notably, four leading contenders in this domain, Rigvir® in Latvia, T-VEC in the United States, H101 in China and Teserpaturev (DELYTACT®) in Japan, have earned approval for treating metastatic melanoma (Rigvir and T-VEC), nasopharyngeal carcinoma and malignant glioma, respectively. Despite these notable advancements, the integration of oncolytic viruses into cancer therapy encounters several challenges. Foremost among these hurdles is the considerable variability observed in clinical responses to oncolytic virus interventions. Moreover, the adaptive immune system may inadvertently target the oncolytic viruses themselves, diverting immune resources away from tumor antigens and undermining therapeutic efficacy. Another significant limitation arises from the presence of preexisting immunity against oncolytic viruses in certain patient populations, hampering treatment outcomes. To circumvent this obstacle, researchers are investigating the utilization of animal viruses, for which humans lack preexisting immunity, as a compelling alternative to human-derived counterparts. In our comprehensive review, we delve into the intricate nuances of oncolytic virotherapy, elucidating the multifaceted mechanisms through which these viruses exert their anti-cancer effects. Furthermore, we provide a thorough examination of animal-derived oncolytic viruses, highlighting their respective strengths and limitations. Lastly, we explore the promising potential of leveraging animal viruses as potent oncolytic agents, offering new avenues for enhancing the efficacy and reach of human cancer therapeutics., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Oncolytic viruses (OV) are a promising strategy in cancer immunotherapy. Their capacity to promote anti-tumoral immunity locally raises hope that cancers unresponsive to current immunotherapy approaches could be tackled more efficiently. In this context, tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) must be considered because of their pivotal role in cancer immunity. Even though TAM tend to inhibit anti-tumoral responses, their ability to secrete pro-inflammatory cytokines and phagocytose cancer cells can be harnessed to promote therapeutic cancer immunity. OVs have the potential to promote TAM pro-inflammatory functions that favor anti-tumoral immunity. But in parallel, TAM pro-inflammatory functions induce OV clearance in the tumor, thereby limiting OV efficacy and highlighting that the interaction between OV and TAM is a double edge sword. Moreover, engineered OVs were recently developed to modulate specific TAM functions such as phagocytic activity. The potential of circulating monocytes to deliver OV into the tumor after intravenous administration is also emerging. In this review, we will present the interaction between OV and TAM, the potential of engineered OV to modulate specific TAM functions, and the promising role of circulating monocytes in OV delivery to the tumor., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Targeted antineoplastic immunotherapies have achieved remarkable clinical outcomes. However, resistance to these therapies due to target absence or antigen shedding limits their efficacy and excludes tumours from candidacy. To address this limitation, here we engineer an oncolytic rhabdovirus, vesicular stomatitis virus (VSVΔ51), to express a truncated targeted antigen, which allows for HER2-targeting with trastuzumab. The truncated HER2 (HER2T) lacks signaling capabilities and is efficiently expressed on infected cell surfaces. VSVΔ51-mediated HER2T expression simulates HER2-positive status in tumours, enabling effective treatment with the antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab emtansine in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo. Additionally, we combine VSVΔ51-HER2T with an oncolytic vaccinia virus expressing a HER2-targeted T-cell engager. This dual-virus therapeutic strategy demonstrates potent curative efficacy in vivo in female mice using CD3+ infiltrate for anti-tumour immunity. Our findings showcase the ability to tailor the tumour microenvironment using oncolytic viruses, thereby enhancing compatibility with "off-the-shelf" targeted therapies., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer and the second most lethal cancer in the world. The main cause of the disease is due to dietary and behavioral factors. The treatment of this complex disease is mainly based on traditional treatments, including surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. Due to its high prevalence and high morbidity, more effective treatments with fewer side effects are urgently needed. In recent years, immunotherapy has become a potential therapeutic alternative and one of the fastest-developing treatments. Immunotherapy inhibits tumor growth by activating or enhancing the immune system to recognize and attack cancer cells. This review presents the latest immunotherapies for immune checkpoint inhibitors, cell therapy, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, and oncolytic viruses. Some of these have shown promising results in clinical trials and are used in clinical treatment., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Yu, Kang, Lei, Li, Yang and Zhang.)

Glioblastoma is the most common and deadliest brain tumour in adults, with a median survival of 15 months under the current standard of care. Immunotherapies like immune checkpoint inhibitors and oncolytic viruses have been extensively studied to improve this endpoint. However, most thus far have failed. To improve the efficacy of immunotherapies to treat glioblastoma, new single-cell imaging modalities like imaging mass cytometry can be leveraged and integrated with computational models. This enables a better understanding of the tumour microenvironment and its role in treatment success or failure in this hard-to-treat tumour. Here, we implemented an agent-based model that allows for spatial predictions of combination chemotherapy, oncolytic virus, and immune checkpoint inhibitors against glioblastoma. We initialised our model with patient imaging mass cytometry data to predict patient-specific responses and found that oncolytic viruses drive combination treatment responses determined by intratumoral cell density. We found that tumours with higher tumour cell density responded better to treatment. When fixing the number of cancer cells, treatment efficacy was shown to be a function of CD4 + T cell and, to a lesser extent, of macrophage counts. Critically, our simulations show that care must be put into the integration of spatial data and agent-based models to effectively capture intratumoral dynamics. Together, this study emphasizes the use of predictive spatial modelling to better understand cancer immunotherapy treatment dynamics, while highlighting key factors to consider during model design and implementation., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Oncolytic viruses (OVs) are an attractive way to increase immune infiltration into an otherwise cold tumor. While OVs are engineered to selectively infect tumor cells, there is evidence that they can infect other non-malignant cells in the tumor. We sought to determine if oncolytic vaccinia virus (VV) can infect lymphocytes in the tumor and, if so, how this was linked to therapeutic efficacy., Methods: To investigate infection of lymphocytes by VV, we used a GFP reporting VV in a murine head and neck squamous cell carcinoma tumor model. We also performed in vitro infection studies to determine the mechanism and consequences of VV lymphocyte infection by VV., Results: Our findings show that VV carries the capacity to infect proportions of immune cells, most notably T cells, after intratumoral treatment. Notably, this infection is preferential to terminally differentiated T cells that tend to reside in hypoxia. Infection of T cells leads to both virus production by the T cells as well as the eventual death of these cells. Using a mouse model which overexpressed the antiapoptotic protein Bcl2 in all T cells, we found that reducing T cell death following VV infection in MEER tumors reduced the number of complete regressions and reduced survival time compared with littermate control mice., Conclusions: These findings suggest that OVs are capable of infecting more than just malignant cells after treatment, and that this infection may be an important part of the OV mechanism. We found that exhausted CD8+ T cells and regulatory CD4+ T cells were preferentially infected at early timepoints after treatment and subsequently died. When cell death in T cells was mitigated, mice responded poorly to VV treatment, suggesting that the deletion of these populations is critical to the therapeutic response to VV., Competing Interests: Competing interests: KD, DBR, and GMD are inventors on various patent applications around the use of oncolytic viruses for cancer therapy and are thus entitled to licensing fees based on success of such agents. GMD is on the scientific advisory board of Kalivir Immunotherapeutics., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Ferroptosis, a necrotic, iron-dependent controlled cell death mechanism, is distinguished by the development of lipid peroxides to fatal proportions. Malignant tumours, influenced by iron to promote fast development, are vulnerable to ferroptosis. Based upon mounting evidence it has been observed that ferroptosis may be immunogenic and hence may complement immunotherapies. A new approach includes iron oxide-loaded nano-vaccines (IONVs), having supremacy for the traits of the tumour microenvironment (TME) to deliver specific antigens through improving the immunostimulatory capacity by molecular disintegration and reversible covalent bonds that target the tumour cells and induce ferroptosis. Apart from IONVs, another newer approach to induce ferroptosis in tumour cells is through oncolytic virus (OVs). One such oncolytic virus is the Newcastle Disease Virus (NDV), which can only multiply in cancer cells through the p53-SLC7A11-GPX4 pathway that leads to elevated levels of lipid peroxide and intracellular reactive oxygen species leading to the induction of ferroptosis that induce ferritinophagy., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: TG6050 was designed as an improved oncolytic vector, combining the intrinsic properties of vaccinia virus to selectively replicate in tumors with the tumor-restricted expression of recombinant immune effectors to modify the tumor immune phenotype. These properties might be of particular interest for "cold" tumors, either poorly infiltrated or infiltrated with anergic T cells., Methods:  TG6050, an oncolytic vaccinia virus encodes single-chain human interleukin-12 (hIL-12) and full-length anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (@CTLA-4) monoclonal antibody. The relevant properties of TG6050 (replication, cytopathy, transgenes expression and functionality) were extensively characterized in vitro . The biodistribution and pharmacokinetics of the viral vector, @CTLA-4 and IL-12, as well as antitumoral activities (alone or combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors) were investigated in several "hot" (highly infiltrated) and "cold" (poorly infiltrated) syngeneic murine tumor models. The mechanism of action was deciphered by monitoring both systemic and intratumoral immune responses, and by tumor transcriptome analysis. The safety of TG6050 after repeated intravenous administrations was evaluated in cynomolgus monkeys, with a focus on the level of circulating IL-12., Results: Multiplication and propagation of TG6050 in tumor cells in vitro and in vivo were associated with local expression of functional IL-12 and @CTLA-4. This dual mechanism translated into a strong antitumoral activity in both "cold" and "hot" tumor models (B16F10, LLC1 or EMT6, CT26, respectively) that was further amplified when combined with anti-programmed cell death protein-1. Analysis of changes in the tumor microenvironment (TME) after treatment with TG6050 showed increases in interferon-gamma, of CD8+T cells, and of M1/M2 macrophages ratio, as well as a drastic decrease of regulatory T cells. These local modifications were observed alongside bolstering a systemic and specific antitumor adaptive immune response. In toxicology studies, TG6050 did not display any observable adverse effects in cynomolgus monkeys., Conclusions: TG6050 effectively delivers functional IL-12 and @CTLA-4 into the tumor, resulting in strong antitumor activity. The shift towards an inflamed TME correlated with a boost in systemic antitumor T cells. The solid preclinical data and favorable benefit/risk ratio paved the way for the clinical evaluation of TG6050 in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NCT05788926 trial in progress)., Competing Interests: Competing interests: All authors were employees and shareholders of Transgene SA., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Over the past decade, cancer immunotherapies have revolutionized the treatment of melanoma; however, responses vary across patient populations. Recently, baseline tumor size has been identified as an independent prognostic factor for overall survival in patients with melanoma receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors. MG1 is a novel oncolytic agent with broad tumor tropism that has recently entered early-phase clinical trials. The aim of this study was to characterize T-cell responses in human and mouse melanoma models following MG1 treatment and to establish if features of the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) at two distinct tumor burdens would impact the efficacy of oncolytic virotherapy., Methods: Human three-dimensional in vitro priming assays were performed to measure antitumor and antiviral T-cell responses following MG1 infection. T-cell receptor (TCR) sequencing, T2 killing assay, and peptide recall assays were used to assess the evolution of the TCR repertoire, and measure specific T-cell responses, respectively. In vivo, subcutaneous 4434 melanomas were characterized using RNA sequencing, immunohistochemistry, and flow cytometry. The effectiveness of intratumoral MG1 was assessed in advancing 4434 tumors and the generation of antitumor and antiviral T cells measured by splenocyte recall assays. Finally, combination MG1 and programmed cell death protein-1 antibody (αPD-1) therapy was investigated in advanced 4434 tumors., Results: MG1 effectively supported priming of functional cytotoxic T cells (CTLs) against tumor-associated antigens as well as virus-derived peptides, as assessed using peptide recall and T2 killing assays, respectively. TCR sequencing revealed that MG1-primed CTL comprised larger clusters of similar CDR3 amino acid sequences compared with controls. In vivo testing of MG1 demonstrated that MG1 monotherapy was highly effective at treating early disease, resulting in 90% cures; however, the efficacy of MG1 reduced as the disease burden (local tumor size) increased, and the addition of αPD-1 was required to overcome resistance in more advanced disease. Differential gene expression profiles revealed that increased tumor burden was associated with an immunologically colder TIME. Furthermore, analysis of TCR signaling in advancing tumors demonstrated a different dynamic of TCR engagement compared with smaller tumors, in particular a shift in antigen recognition by CD4+ cells, from conventional to regulatory subsets., Conclusion: Addition of αPD-1 to MG1 is required to overcome viral therapy resistance in immunologically 'colder' more advanced melanoma, highlighting the importance of tumor burden to different types of immunotherapy., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.)

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1384623.]., (Copyright © 2024 Paudel, Hutzen, Miller, Garfinkle, Chen, Wang, Glaspell, Currier, Ringwalt, Boon, Mardis, Cairo, Ratner, Dodd, Cassady and Cripe.)

Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Vaccinia viruses (VACVs) are versatile therapeutic agents and different features of various VACV strains allow for a broad range of therapeutic applications. Modified VACV Ankara (MVA) is a particularly altered VACV strain that is highly immunogenic, incapable of replicating in mammalian hosts, and broadly used as a safe vector for vaccination. Alternatively, Western Reserve (WR) or Copenhagen (Cop) are VACV strains that efficiently replicate in cancer cells and, therefore, are used to develop oncolytic viruses. However, the immune evasion capacity of WR or Cop hinders their ability to elicit antitumor immune responses, which is crucial for efficacy in the clinic. Here, we describe a new VACV strain named Immune-Oncolytic VACV Ankara (IOVA), which combines efficient replication in cancer cells with induction of immunogenic tumor cell death (ICD). IOVA was engineered from an MVA ancestor and shows superior cytotoxicity in tumor cells. In addition, the IOVA genome incorporates mutations that lead to massive fusogenesis of tumor cells, which contributes to improved antitumor effects. In syngeneic mouse tumor models, the induction of ICD results in robust antitumor immunity directed against tumor neo-epitopes and eradication of large established tumors. These data present IOVA as an improved immunotherapeutic oncolytic vector., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests J.J.R. and G.S. have filed the patent application WO2019106205A1 and are named as inventors on this patent application describing the use of immune oncolytic VACV., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Recent studies have indicated that combining oncolytic viruses with CAR-T cells in therapy has shown superior anti-tumor effects, representing a promising approach. Nonetheless, the localized delivery method of intratumoral injection poses challenges for treating metastatic tumors or distal tumors that are difficult to reach. To address this obstacle, we employed HSV-1-infected CAR-T cells, which systemically delivery HSV into solid tumors. The biological function of CAR-T cells remained intact after loading them with HSV for a period of three days. In both immunocompromised and immunocompetent GBM orthotopic mouse models, B7-H3 CAR-T cells effectively delivered HSV to tumor lesions, resulting in enhanced T-cell infiltration and significantly prolonged survival in mice. We also employed a bilateral subcutaneous tumor model and observed that the group receiving intratumoral virus injection exhibited a significant reduction in tumor volume on the injected side, while the group receiving intravenous infusion of CAR-T cells carrying HSV displayed suppressed tumor growth on both sides. Hence, CAR-T HSV cells offer notable advantages in the systemic delivery of HSV to distant tumors. In conclusion, our findings emphasize the potential of CAR-T cells as carriers for HSV, presenting significant advantages for oncolytic virotherapy targeting distant tumors., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose of Review: This review provides a comprehensive update on recent advancements in melanoma treatment by highlighting promising therapeutics with an aim to increase awareness of novel interventions currently in development., Recent Findings: Over the last decade there has been considerable expansion of the previously available treatment options for patients with melanoma. In particular, novel immunotherapeutics have been developed to expand on the clinical advancements brought by BRAF targeting and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Despite the success of checkpoint inhibitors there remains an unmet need for patients that do not respond to treatment. This review delves into the latest advancements in novel checkpoint inhibitors, cytokines, oncolytic viruses, vaccines, bispecific antibodies, and adoptive cell therapy. Preclinical experiments and early-stage clinical trials studies have demonstrated promising results for these therapies, many of which have moved into pivotal, phase 3 studies., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Oncolytic viruses (OVs) are increasingly recognized as potent tools in cancer therapy, effectively targeting and eradicating oncogenic conditions while sparing healthy cells. They enhance antitumor immunity by triggering various immune responses throughout the cancer cycle. Genetically engineered OVs swiftly destroy cancerous tissues and activate the immune system by releasing soluble antigens like danger signals and interferons. Their ability to stimulate both innate and adaptive immunity makes them particularly attractive in cancer immunotherapy. Recent advancements involve combining OVs with other immune therapies, yielding promising results. Transgenic OVs, designed to enhance immunostimulation and specifically target cancer cells, further improve immune responses. This review highlights the intrinsic mechanisms of OVs and underscores their synergistic potential with other immunotherapies. It also proposes strategies for optimizing armed OVs to bolster immunity against tumors., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Tumor-specific T cells are crucial in anti-tumor immunity and act as targets for cancer immunotherapies. However, these cells are numerically scarce and functionally exhausted in the tumor microenvironment (TME), leading to inefficacious immunotherapies in most patients with cancer. By contrast, emerging evidence suggested that tumor-irrelevant bystander T (T BYS ) cells are abundant and preserve functional memory properties in the TME. To leverage T BYS cells in the TME to eliminate tumor cells, we engineered oncolytic virus (OV) encoding T BYS epitopes (OV-BYTE) to redirect the antigen specificity of tumor cells to pre-existing T BYS cells, leading to effective tumor inhibition in multiple preclinical models. Mechanistically, OV-BYTE induced epitope spreading of tumor antigens to elicit more diverse tumor-specific T cell responses. Remarkably, the OV-BYTE strategy targeting human severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-specific T cell memory efficiently inhibited tumor progression in a human tumor cell-derived xenograft model, providing important insights into the improvement of cancer immunotherapies in a large population with a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection or coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Although patients benefit from immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) therapy in a broad variety of tumors, resistance may arise from immune suppressive tumor microenvironments (TME), which is particularly true of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Since oncolytic viruses (OV) can generate a highly immune-infiltrated, inflammatory TME, OVs could potentially restore ICI responsiveness via recruitment, priming, and activation of anti-tumor T cells. Here we find that on the contrary, an oncolytic vesicular stomatitis virus, expressing interferon-ß (VSV-IFNß), antagonizes the effect of anti-PD-L1 therapy in a partially anti-PD-L1-responsive model of HCC. Cytometry by Time of Flight shows that VSV-IFNß expands dominant anti-viral effector CD8 T cells with concomitant relative disappearance of anti-tumor T cell populations, which are the target of anti-PD-L1. However, by expressing a range of HCC tumor antigens within VSV, combination OV and anti-PD-L1 therapeutic benefit could be restored. Our data provide a cautionary message for the use of highly immunogenic viruses as tumor-specific immune-therapeutics by showing that dominant anti-viral T cell responses can inhibit sub-dominant anti-tumor T cell responses. However, through encoding tumor antigens within the virus, oncolytic virotherapy can generate anti-tumor T cell populations upon which immune checkpoint blockade can effectively work., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST) pose a significant therapeutic challenge due to high recurrence rates after surgical resection and a largely ineffective response to traditional chemotherapy. An alternative treatment strategy is oncolytic viroimmunotherapy, which can elicit a durable and systemic antitumor immune response and is Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved for the treatment of melanoma. Unfortunately, only a subset of patients responds completely, underscoring the need to address barriers hindering viroimmunotherapy effectiveness., Methods: Here we investigated the therapeutic utility of targeting key components of the MPNST immunosuppressive microenvironment to enhance viroimmunotherapy's antitumor efficacy in three murine models, one of which showed more immunogenic characteristics than the others., Results: Myelomodulatory therapy with pexidartinib, a small molecule inhibitor of CSF1R tyrosine kinase, and the oncolytic herpes simplex virus T-VEC exhibited the most significant increase in median survival time in the highly immunogenic model. Additionally, targeting myeloid cells with the myelomodulatory therapy trabectedin, a small molecule activator of caspase-8 dependent apoptosis, augmented the survival benefit of T-VEC in a less immunogenic MPNST model. However, tumor regressions or shrinkages were not observed. Depletion experiments confirmed that the enhanced survival benefit relied on a T cell response. Furthermore, flow cytometry analysis following combination viroimmunotherapy revealed decreased M2 macrophages and myeloid-derived suppressor cells and increased tumor-specific gp70+ CD8 T cells within the tumor microenvironment., Discussion: In summary, our findings provide compelling evidence for the potential to leverage viroimmunotherapy with myeloid cell targeting against MPNST and warrant further investigation., Competing Interests: LB was employed by JJP Biologics. MSC has served as a consultant for Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Omeros Pharmaceuticals, Servier Pharmaceuticals, Abbvie and Novartis Pharmaceuticals; Speakers Bureau for Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Amgen, Inc., Sanofi and Sobi; Advisory Board for Astra Zeneca; and research funding from Celularity, Merck, Miltenyi Biotec, Servier, Omeros, Jazz and Janssen. KC holds intellectual property for oncolytic virus C134, which was licensed to Mustang Bio. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision., (Copyright © 2024 Paudel, Hutzen, Miller, Garfinkle, Chen, Wang, Glaspell, Currier, Ringwalt, Boon, Mardis, Cairo, Ratner, Dodd, Cassady and Cripe.)

Introduction: Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) are aggressive sarcomas with unacceptably low cure rates occurring often in patients with neurofibromatosis 1 defects. To investigate oncolytic Herpes Simplex Virus (oHSV) as an immunotherapeutic approach, we compared viral replication, functional activity, and immune response between unarmed and interleukin 12 (IL-12)-armed oncolytic viruses in virus-permissive (B109) and -resistant (67C-4) murine MPNSTs., Methods: This study compared two attenuated IL-12-oHSVs with γ134.5 gene deletions (Δγ134.5) and the same transgene expression cassette. The primary difference in the IL-12-oHSVs was in their ability to counter the translational arrest response in infected cells. Unlike M002 (Δγ134.5, mIL-12), C002 (Δγ134.5, mIL-12, IRS1) expresses an HCMV IRS1 gene and evades dsRNA activated translational arrest in infected cells., Results and Discussion: Our results show that oHSV replication and gene expression results in vitro were not predictive of oHSV direct oncolytic activity in vivo. Tumors that supported viral replication in cell culture studies resisted viral replication by both oHSVs and restricted M002 transgene expression in vivo. Furthermore, two IL-12-oHSVs with equivalent transcriptional activity differed in IL-12 protein production in vivo, and the differences in IL-12 protein levels were reflected in immune infiltrate activity changes as well as tumor growth suppression differences between the IL-12-oHSVs. C002-treated tumors exhibited sustained IL-12 production with improved dendritic cells, monocyte-macrophage activity (MHCII, CD80/CD86 upregulation) and a polyfunctional Th1-cell response in the tumor infiltrates., Conclusion: These results suggest that transgene protein production differences between oHSVs in vivo, in addition to replication differences, can impact OV-therapeutic activity., Competing Interests: JM has the following relationships which may pose or be perceived as posing a financial conflict of interest: he is a board and equity holding member, in Aettis, Inc. and may receive royalties. The company holds frozen oncolytic viral stocks. Mustang Bio Tech is licensing the Intellectual Property IP of C134 an oncolytic viral Therapy. JM is blinded to the conditions for the C134 clinical trials. He is a shareholder for a privately held Small Business Innovation Research LLC, Treovir, Inc., concerning G207 oncolytic viral therapy now in clinical trial. Merck, Inc. provides industry grant support by providing Keytruda pembrolizumab for a clinical trial of M032 oncolytic virotherapy and financial support for a clinical trial. JM is a listee on Intellectual Property 1 related to a cancer immunotherapy system, and 2 to a novel immuno-virotherapeutic strategy targeting the glioma secretome. This IP has been filed by in8Bio formerly Incysus, Ltd. and has royalty earning potential. In the interest of full disclosure, KC receives licensure payments from Mustang Bio for the C134 virus, but there are no relevant financial conflicts for the technology addressed in this paper. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Kim, Saini, Kim, Hernandez-Aguirre, Hedberg, Martin, Mo, Cripe, Markert, Cassady and Dhital.)

IFN regulatory factor 1 (IRF1) can promote antitumor immunity. However, we have shown previously that in the tumor cell, IRF1 can promote tumor growth, and IRF1-deficient tumor cells exhibit severely restricted tumor growth in several syngeneic mouse tumor models. Here, we investigate the potential of functionally modulating IRF1 to reduce tumor progression and prolong survival. Using inducible IRF1 expression, we established that it is possible to regulate IRF1 expression to modulate tumor progression in established B16-F10 tumors. Expression of IRF2, which is a functional antagonist of IRF1, downregulated IFNγ-induced expression of inhibitory ligands, upregulated MHC-related molecules, and slowed tumor growth and extended survival. We characterized the functional domain(s) of IRF2 needed for this antitumor activity, showing that a full-length IRF2 was required for its antitumor functions. Finally, using an oncolytic vaccinia virus as a delivery platform, we showed that IRF2-expressing vaccinia virus suppressed tumor progression and prolonged survival in multiple tumor models. These results suggest the potency of targeting IRF1 and using IRF2 to modulate immunotherapy., (©2024 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Evaluation of: Araki H, Tazawa H, Kanaya N, et al. Oncolytic virus-mediated p53 overexpression promotes immunogenic cell death and efficacy of PD-1 blockade in pancreatic cancer. Mol Ther Oncolytics. 2022;27:3-13.Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive malignancy with poor prognosis. PDAC has a dense, desmoplastic stroma and immunosuppressive microenvironment, which impedes current treatment options. Immunotherapy delivered via oncolytic virotherapy is one potential solution to these barriers. Immune checkpoint inhibitors may facilitate immunogenic cell death by improving immune cell infiltration in cancer cells. PD-1 blockade shows better clinical outcomes for certain cancers. The addition of p53 to stimulate cell cycle arrest remains a novel field of research. The evaluated article by Araki et al . explores the efficacy of PD-1 blockade with oncolytic adenovirus platforms on immunogenic cell death and the possibility of combining PD-1 blockade and p53-activation. In vitro analysis showed increased cell death in multiple cell lines infected with AdV mediating p53 expression. The underlying process may attribute to apoptosis and autophagy, with evidence of increased immunogenic cell death. In vivo models demonstrated improved efficacy of p53-expressing AdV, particularly with the addition of PD-1 blockade which appears to be related to CD8+ cell infiltration.

Oncolytic virus (OV)-based immunotherapy has emerged as a promising strategy for cancer treatment, offering a unique potential to selectively target malignant cells while sparing normal tissues. However, the immunosuppressive nature of tumor microenvironment (TME) poses a substantial hurdle to the development of OVs as effective immunotherapeutic agents, as it restricts the activation and recruitment of immune cells. This review elucidates the potential of OV-based immunotherapy in modulating the immune landscape within the TME to overcome immune resistance and enhance antitumor immune responses. We examine the role of OVs in targeting specific immune cell populations, including dendritic cells, T cells, natural killer cells, and macrophages, and their ability to alter the TME by inhibiting angiogenesis and reducing tumor fibrosis. Additionally, we explore strategies to optimize OV-based drug delivery and improve the efficiency of OV-mediated immunotherapy. In conclusion, this review offers a concise and comprehensive synopsis of the current status and future prospects of OV-based immunotherapy, underscoring its remarkable potential as an effective immunotherapeutic agent for cancer treatment., (© 2023. Higher Education Press.)

The heterogeneity of the solid tumor microenvironment (TME) impairs the therapeutic efficacy of standard therapies and also reduces the infiltration of antitumor immune cells, all of which lead to tumor progression and invasion. In addition, self-renewing cancer stem cells (CSCs) support tumor dormancy, drug resistance, and recurrence, all of which might pose challenges to the eradication of malignant tumor masses with current therapies. Natural forms of oncolytic viruses (OVs) or engineered OVs are known for their potential to directly target and kill tumor cells or indirectly eradicate tumor cells by involving antitumor immune responses, including enhancement of infiltrating antitumor immune cells, induction of immunogenic cell death, and reprogramming of cold TME to an immune-sensitive hot state. More importantly, OVs can target stemness factors that promote tumor progression, which subsequently enhances the efficacy of immunotherapies targeting solid tumors, particularly the CSC subpopulation. Herein, we describe the role of CSCs in tumor heterogeneity and resistance and then highlight the potential and remaining challenges of immunotherapies targeting CSCs. We then review the potential of OVs to improve tumor immunogenicity and target CSCs and finally summarize the challenges within the therapeutic application of OVs in preclinical and clinical trials., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Cytokines are small proteins that regulate the growth and functional activity of immune cells, and several have been approved for cancer therapy. Oncolytic viruses are agents that mediate antitumor activity by directly killing tumor cells and inducing immune responses. Talimogene laherparepvec is an oncolytic herpes simplex virus type 1 (oHSV), approved for the treatment of recurrent melanoma, and the virus encodes the human cytokine, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). A significant advantage of oncolytic viruses is the ability to deliver therapeutic payloads to the tumor site that can help drive antitumor immunity. While cytokines are especially interesting as payloads, the optimal cytokine(s) used in oncolytic viruses remains controversial. In this review, we highlight preliminary data with several cytokines and chemokines, including GM-CSF, interleukin 12, FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 ligand, tumor necrosis factor α, interleukin 2, interleukin 15, interleukin 18, chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2, chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 5, chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 4, or their combinations, and show how these payloads can further enhance the antitumor immunity of oHSV. A better understanding of cytokine delivery by oHSV can help improve clinical benefit from oncolytic virus immunotherapy in patients with cancer., Competing Interests: Competing interests: SDR is a co-inventor on patents relating to oncolytic herpes simplex viruses, owned, and managed by Georgetown University and Massachusetts General Hospital, which have received royalties from Amgen and Acti\Vec Inc., and acted as a consultant and received honoraria from Replimune, Cellinta, and Greenfire Bio, and honoraria and equity from EG 427. HLK is an employee of Ankyra Therapeutics and has received honoraria for participating on advisory boards for Castle Biosciences, Midatech Pharma, Marengo Therapeutics, and Virogin. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)