Search

Background: Distal end radius fractures are common injuries treated in orthopedic practice, with varying treatment modalities influencing outcomes. Aims and Objectives: The study was designed to compare the outcomes between open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with plating and K-wires plus casting in patients treated for distal end radius fractures. Materials and Methods: One hundred patients with distal end radius fractures were included and divided into two groups: Group A (ORIF with plating) and Group B (K-wires plus casting), with 50 patients in each group. Parameters included were healing time, complication rates, functional recovery, patient satisfaction scores, pain levels during recovery, and the time to return to daily activities. Results: Group A demonstrated a shorter average healing time (8 weeks) compared to Group B (9 weeks). Complication rates showed 5% malunion and 4% delayed union in Group A, against 12% and 6%, respectively, in Group B. Functional recovery was higher in Group A, with 93% grip strength and 88% range of motion recovery. Patient satisfaction was also higher in Group A (8.5 out of 10) compared to Group B (7.5 out of 10). Pain levels during recovery were lower in Group A, and the time to return to daily activities was shorter (8 weeks for Group A versus 10 weeks for Group B). Conclusion: The study suggests that ORIF with plating offers better outcomes in terms of healing time, complication rates, functional recovery, patient satisfaction, pain management, and quicker return to daily activities than K-wires plus casting for distal end radius fractures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Distal end radius fractures are common injuries treated in orthopedic practice, with varying treatment modalities influencing outcomes. Aims and Objectives: The study was designed to compare the outcomes between open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with plating and K-wires plus casting in patients treated for distal end radius fractures. Materials and Methods: One hundred patients with distal end radius fractures were included and divided into two groups: Group A (ORIF with plating) and Group B (K-wires plus casting), with 50 patients in each group. Parameters included were healing time, complication rates, functional recovery, patient satisfaction scores, pain levels during recovery, and the time to return to daily activities. Results: Group A demonstrated a shorter average healing time (8 weeks) compared to Group B (9 weeks). Complication rates showed 5% malunion and 4% delayed union in Group A, against 12% and 6%, respectively, in Group B. Functional recovery was higher in Group A, with 93% grip strength and 88% range of motion recovery. Patient satisfaction was also higher in Group A (8.5 out of 10) compared to Group B (7.5 out of 10). Pain levels during recovery were lower in Group A, and the time to return to daily activities was shorter (8 weeks for Group A versus 10 weeks for Group B). Conclusion: The study suggests that ORIF with plating offers better outcomes in terms of healing time, complication rates, functional recovery, patient satisfaction, pain management, and quicker return to daily activities than K-wires plus casting for distal end radius fractures.

Objectives: Midshaft clavicular fractures are increasingly treated operatively rather than nonoperatively. Studies have shown mixed results for both types of treatment. The aim of this study was to compare the early-stage functional status associated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with plating and that associated with conservative treatment for displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. Materials and Methods: A single-center retrospective review of the results of 120 cases of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures in patients aged 30–65 years old was conducted. The primary outcome was fracture union status at 6 months. Other outcomes were subjective shoulder value (SSV) scores, visual analog scale (VAS) scores, and radiographic shortening at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months. The complication rates in the operative and nonoperative groups were recorded. Results: The delayed union rate at 6-month postoperatively and VAS scores at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postinjury were significantly higher in the conservative treatment group than in the ORIF group. SSV scores were significantly improved at 6-month postinjury in the ORIF group. Conclusions: This is the first study to discuss the importance of early-stage functional restoration after ORIF with plating for displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. This surgery leads to lower pain complications in the earlier stages of bone healing and lower delayed union rates compared with conservative treatment, in patients aged 30–65 years old.

Objectives: Midshaft clavicular fractures are increasingly treated operatively rather than nonoperatively. Studies have shown mixed results for both types of treatment. The aim of this study was to compare the early-stage functional status associated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with plating and that associated with conservative treatment for displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. Materials and Methods: A single-center retrospective review of the results of 120 cases of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures in patients aged 30–65 years old was conducted. The primary outcome was fracture union status at 6 months. Other outcomes were subjective shoulder value (SSV) scores, visual analog scale (VAS) scores, and radiographic shortening at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months. The complication rates in the operative and nonoperative groups were recorded. Results: The delayed union rate at 6-month postoperatively and VAS scores at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postinjury were significantly higher in the conservative treatment group than in the ORIF group. SSV scores were significantly improved at 6-month postinjury in the ORIF group. Conclusions: This is the first study to discuss the importance of early-stage functional restoration after ORIF with plating for displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. This surgery leads to lower pain complications in the earlier stages of bone healing and lower delayed union rates compared with conservative treatment, in patients aged 30–65 years old. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Midshaft clavicular fractures are increasingly treated operatively rather than nonoperatively. Studies have shown mixed results for both types of treatment. The aim of this study was to compare the early-stage functional status associated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with plating and that associated with conservative treatment for displaced midshaft clavicular fractures., Materials and Methods: A single-center retrospective review of the results of 120 cases of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures in patients aged 30-65 years old was conducted. The primary outcome was fracture union status at 6 months. Other outcomes were subjective shoulder value (SSV) scores, visual analog scale (VAS) scores, and radiographic shortening at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months. The complication rates in the operative and nonoperative groups were recorded., Results: The delayed union rate at 6-month postoperatively and VAS scores at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postinjury were significantly higher in the conservative treatment group than in the ORIF group. SSV scores were significantly improved at 6-month postinjury in the ORIF group., Conclusions: This is the first study to discuss the importance of early-stage functional restoration after ORIF with plating for displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. This surgery leads to lower pain complications in the earlier stages of bone healing and lower delayed union rates compared with conservative treatment, in patients aged 30-65 years old., Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest.