Search

Testicular germ cell tumors (TGCTs), the most common malignancies affecting young men, are characterized by high sensitivity to cisplatin-based chemotherapy, which leads to high cure rates even in metastatic disease. However, approximately 30% of patients with metastatic TGCTs relapse after first-line treatment and those who can be defined as platinum-refractory patients face a very dismal prognosis with only limited chemotherapy-based treatment options and an overall survival of few months. Hence, to understand the mechanisms underlying cisplatin resistance is crucial for developing new treatment strategies. This narrative review explores the potential role of PARP inhibitors (PARPis) in overcoming cisplatin resistance in TGCTs, starting from the rationale of their ability to induce DNA damage in cells with homologous recombination repair (HRR). Thus far, PARPis have failed to show meaningful clinical activity in platinum-refractory TGCT patients, either alone or in combination with chemotherapy. However, few responses to PARPis in TGCTs have been detected in patients with BRCA1/2, ATM or CHEK2 mutations, reinforcing the idea that patients should be optimally selected for tailored treatments in the era of personalized medicine. Future preclinical and clinical research is needed to further investigate the molecular mechanisms of cisplatin resistance and to identify novel therapeutic strategies in resistant/refractory TGCTs patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Platinum-based chemotherapy represents the standard first-line treatment for biliary tract cancers (BTC). Deficits in genes involved in the homologous recombination (HR) and DNA damage response (DDR) may confer higher sensitivity to platinum agents. Methods We retrospectively included patients affected by BTC from 2 Italian institutions. Inclusion criteria consist of the receipt of platinum-based chemotherapy in the metastatic setting and the availability of comprehensive genomic profiling using next-generation sequencing (NGS). Patients were included in the HRD-like group if demonstrated oncogenic or likely oncogenic alterations in HR-/DDR-genes. Clinical endpoints were compared between the HRD-like group and the non-HRD-like group. Results Seventy-four patients were included, of whom 25 (33%) in the HRD-like group and 49 (66%) in the non-HRD group. With a median follow-up of 26.04 months (interquartile-range [IQR] 9.41-29.27) in the HRD-like group and of 22.48 months (IQR 16.86-40.53) in the non-HRD group, no PFS difference emerged, with a mPFS of 5.18 months in the HRD-like group compared to 6.04 months in the non-HRD group (hazard ratio [HR], 1.017, 95% CI 0.58-1.78; P  = .95). No differences were observed in DCR (64% [95 CI 45%-83%] vs 73% [95 CI 61%-86%]; P  = .4), and CBR (45% [95% CI 28%-73%] vs 50% [95% CI, 37%-68%]; P  = .9) between the HRD-like group and non-HRD groups, respectively. Median OS did not statistically differ between the HRD-like group and non-HRD group (26.7 vs 18.0 months, respectively; HR, 0.670, 0.33 to 1.37, P  = .27). Conclusion HR-/DDR-genes, when assessed with regular tumor-only NGS panels, provide limited clinical validity to identify patients with BTC more likely to benefit from platinum-based chemotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]