Search

Among solid tumors, melanoma is the most aggressive form of skin cancer, with the highest risk of developing brain metastasis. The central nervous system is the most frequent initial site of treatment failure, both with chemotherapy and with biological therapies. The combination of antiCTLA4 and antiPD1 is superior to single agents alone in terms of rapidity and duration of responses, although its activity is limited in symptomatic patients. Target therapy induces rapid responses in a significant proportion of patients, but these are generally short-lasting. Currently, there is a great interest in evaluating the combination with new immunotherapy and antiangiogenic agents, with sequential or concomitant radiotherapy. Multidisciplinary management of patients with melanoma brain metastasis is crucial to provide the best treatment in the context of a patient-centered approach.

Simple Summary Concurrent chemo-radiotherapy is the standard treatment in anal cancer. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was proved to reduce severe, acute and late toxicities. Moreover, IMRT techniques allow for the planning and delivery of a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB), with a differential dose per fraction given to selected sub-regions during the same treatment session. This boost modality provides the chance to employ a dose-painted approach with a reduction in overall treatment time that could result in a potential clinical advantage. Since a large variability in dose prescription to the primary tumor and elective or involved lymph nodes can be found in available guidelines and clinical practice, a multicenter analysis was conducted to evaluate the pattern of care and the impact of radiotherapy parameters on clinical outcomes for anal cancer patients treated with IMRT techniques within a national cohort. Abstract A multi-institutional retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the pattern of care and clinical outcomes of anal cancer patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) techniques. In a cohort of 987 patients, the clinical complete response (CR) rate (beyond 6 months) was 90.6%. The 3-year local control (LC) rate was 85.8% (95% CI: 84.4–87.2), and the 3-year colostomy-free survival (CFS) rate was 77.9% (95% CI: 76.1–79.8). Three-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 80.2% and 88.1% (95% CI: 78.8–89.4) (95% CI: 78.5–81.9), respectively. Histological grade 3 and nodal involvement were associated with lower CR (p = 0.030 and p = 0.004, respectively). A statistically significant association was found between advanced stage and nodal involvement, and LC, CFS, PFS, OS and event-free survival (EFS). Overall treatment time (OTT) ≥45 days showed a trend for a lower PFS (p = 0.050) and was significantly associated with lower EFS (p = 0.030) and histological grade 3 with a lower LC (p = 0.025). No statistically significant association was found between total dose, dose/fraction and/or boost modality and clinical outcomes. This analysis reports excellent clinical results and a mild toxicity profile, confirming IMRT techniques as standard of care for the curative treatment of anal cancer patients. Lymph node involvement and histological grade have been confirmed as the most important negative prognostic factors.

Myopericytoma (MPC) is a rare tumor with perivascular proliferation of pluripotent stem-cell-like pericytes. Although indolent, MPC may be locally aggressive with recurrent disease. The pathogenesis and diagnostic biomarkers of MPC are poorly understood. We discovered that 15% of benign MPCs (thyroid, skin; 3 of 20 samples) harbored BRAF(WT/V600E); 33.3% (1 of 3 samples) of BRAF(WT/V600E)-MPCs were multifocal/infiltrative/recurrent. Patient-MPC and primary MPC cells harbored BRAF(WT/V600E), were clonal and expressed pericytic-differentiation biomarkers crucial for its microenvironment. BRAF(WT/V600E)-positive thyroid MPC primary cells triggered in vitro (8.8-fold increase) and in vivo (3.6-fold increase) angiogenesis. Anti-BRAF(V600E) therapy with vemurafenib disrupted angiogenic and metabolic properties (~3-fold decrease) with down-regulation (~2.2-fold decrease) of some extracellular-matrix (ECM) factors and ECM-associated long non-coding RNA (LincRNA) expression, with no effects in BRAF(WT)-pericytes. Vemurafenib also inhibited (~3-fold decrease) cell viability in vitro and in BRAF(WT/V600E)-positive thyroid MPC patient-derived xenograft (PDX) mice (n = 5 mice per group). We established the first BRAF(WT/V600E)-dependent thyroid MPC cell culture. Our findings identify BRAF(WT/V600E) as a novel genetic aberration in MPC pathogenesis and MPC-associated biomarkers and imply that anti-BRAF(V600E) agents may be useful adjuvant therapy in BRAF(WT/V600E)-MPC patients. Patients with BRAF(WT/V600E)-MPC should be closely followed because of the risk for multifocality/recurrence.