Search

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of ustekinumab in the treatment of enteropathic arthritis. Materials & methods: A systematic literature search was performed in the Pubmed database of publications between January 2010 and October 2021. Demographic characteristics, comorbidities, inflammatory bowel disease and enteropathic arthritis symptoms, other extraintestinal findings, medical treatments and clinical and laboratory findings for all cases were recorded. Results: A total of 11 patients were included. While clinical and laboratory remission was achieved in terms of inflammatory bowel disease in all patients and enteropathic arthritis in nine patients after ustekinumab treatment, other extraintestinal findings for all patients completely regressed after treatment. Conclusion: Ustekinumab may be an appropriate treatment option for this patient group, considering both pathogenesis and successful treatment responses.

© 2022 Asia Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.The aim of this study is to evaluate development of side effects, thrombotic or obstetric complications in our antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) patient group, after vaccination against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). A cohort was formed from patients who have previously been followed up with a diagnosis of APS. The patients of the cohort were evaluated retrospectively to find out if they were vaccinated with CoronaVac and/or BNT162b2 vaccines which are being used in our country. To evaluate the side effects seen after the vaccination, the information was collected by the patients in their outpatient appointments or making a phone call. Thirty-five APS patients who had received at least 1 dose of any of the COVID-19 vaccines were included in the study. Median (min–max) number of vaccine doses per patient was 2 (1–3). Eleven patients had a booster dose after primary vaccination. Twenty patients were ever vaccinated with BNT162b2 and 18 with CoronaVac. Among BNT162b2 recipients, 9 (45.0%) and among CoronaVac recipients 15 (42.9%) reported an adverse event after a vaccine administration. The most common adverse events were myalgia and malaise after any dose of both vaccines. No vaccine-related new thrombotic events or APS flares were observed. Our results were comparable with those reported in the literature. Comprehensive large-scale studies are needed for more accurate results on the evaluation of side effects after COVID-19 vaccination in APS patients.

Introduction: Patients with chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases (CIRD) who receive intravenous therapy requiring hospitalization are likely to be more affected than those with receiving oral therapy during COVID-19 pandemic. We aimed to investigate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on adherence to treatment in patients with CIRD receiving intravenous treatments. Methods: We evaluated patients with CIRD who were treated with intravenous immunosuppressive therapy such as rituximab (RTX), cyclophosphamide (CTX), infliximab (IFX), tocilizumab (TCZ) and abatacept (ABA) in our inpatient rheumatology clinic. The patientsʼ medical treatment compliance and clinical follow-up were evaluated. Treatment discontinuation was decided according to postponement of at least one dose and discontinuation of CIRD treatments. Demographics and clinical characteristics were compared between treatment-incompliant (TI) and treatment-compliant (TC) groups. Results: A total of 181 CIRD patients were enrolled. Rheumatoid arthritis was the most common disease requiring intravenous immunosuppressive treatment followed by axial spondyloarthritis and Behçet’s disease. Joint involvement was the most common followed by lung and kidney involvements. Rituximab was the most widely used intravenous immunosuppressive treatment for the CIRD. 34% patients have postponed at least one dose of their intravenous CIRD treatment and 25% discontinued. Fear of COVID-19 and SARS-CoV-2 positivity were the most common reasons. The TI group had a longer disease duration and a higher frequency of inflammatory arthritis than the TC group (p=0.013 and p=0.044, respectively). Conclusions: Fear of COVID-19 and SARS-CoV-2 positivity seemed to be the major reasons for discontinuing/postponing intravenous treatments in CIRD patients. Patients with long disease duration and less systemic involvement may be more prone to discontinuing their treatments.

Background/aim: The JAK-STAT pathway is involved in the pathogenesis of both the inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and spondyloarthropathy group of diseases. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of tofacitinib, a Janus kinase inhibitor, in the treatment of enteropathic arthritis (EA). Materials & methods: The study included seven patients, four from the authors' follow-up and three from the literature. All cases were recorded for demographic characteristics, comorbidities, IBD and EA symptoms, medical treatments and changes in clinical and laboratory results with treatment. Results & conclusion: Clinical and laboratory remission in terms of IBD and EA was achieved in three patients after tofacitinib treatment. For both spondyloarthritis spectrum diseases and IBD, tofacitinib may be an appropriate choice, as its efficacy has been shown in both conditions.

Objectives: Although anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) antibody is a specific marker for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), it is also detected positively in some other rheumatological diseases including Sjögren's syndrome (SS) and even in healthy people. Studies have shown that anti-CCP guides the early diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of RA patients. SS and RA overlap syndrome are common. This study was conducted to determine the prevalence and clinical significance of serum anti-CCP in primary SS patients followed in our outpatient clinic. Methods: Eighty-two primary SS, 100 RA patients and 100 healthy controls applied to rheumatology outpatient clinic were examined. Patients and control groups were compared in terms of demographic characteristics, laboratory results and anti-CCP. Results: In the present study, anti-CCP was positive in 4 (4.9%) of 82 primary SS patients. In the SS group, among other autoantibodies, ANA was found to be positive at 88.8%, RF 45%, SS-A 64.6%, and SS-B 36.7%. There was no relationship between anti-CCP and joint involvement in patients with SS. Conclusions: Anti-CCP antibody positivity can be found in SS patients. Acute phase proteins may be higher in primary SS patients with positive anti-CCP antibody. However, studies have found conflicting findings about the prevalence of erosive arthritis and the future development of RA in these patient groups.

Aim: To investigate clinical implications of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) positivity detected in COVID-19 patients during follow up. Materials & methods: A retrospective survey in a hospital database was carried out to detect COVID-19 patients in which ANCAs had been tested. Clinical, laboratory and imaging data were collected from this hospital database and compared between ANCA-negative and -positive patients. Results: ANCAs were tested in 87 COVID-19 patients. Eight had positivity in at least one ANCA test. COVID-19 symptoms on admission and rate of pulmonary involvement were similar. Acute phase reactant levels were higher in ANCA-positive patients. Rate of mortality was higher in the ANCA-positive group without statistical significance. Conclusion: ANCA positivity detected during COVID-19 in patients without a prior diagnosis of any rheumatic condition may be related with worse outcomes.

Background/Aim: Adult-onset Still’s disease (AOSD) is a multi-systemic, autoinflammatory disorder. Several activity scores have been proposed but none of them have been adopted universally. Our aim was to create a clinician-friendly activity scoring system by using simple clinical and laboratory parameters. Methods: AODS patients according to Yamaguchi criteria were included in this cross-sectional, multi-center study. Derivation and validation cohorts were constituted. Demographic, clinical and laboratory evaluation at study visit; patients’, and physicians’ global assessments of disease activity (both VAS/ Likert scale) were recorded. To develop the score; ordinal logistic regression model was used to determine independent predictors of patient’ global assessments of disease activity. Clinically and statistically significant variables were weighted according to regression coefficients. Then, performance of the score was tested on the validation cohort. Results: Total of 197 consecutive AOSD patient (125 in derivation, 72 in validation cohorts) were included. Final Still Activity Score was fever (2 points), arthralgia (2 points, plus 1 point if arthritis was present in ≥2 joints), neutrophilia≥65% (1 point) and ferritin≥350 ng/mL (1 point) (maximum of 7 points). The SAS yielded an AUC value of 0.98(0.96-1.00) in the derivation cohort and 0.91(95%CI:0.85-0.98) in the validation cohort to discriminate high AOSD activity from moderate-inactive AOSD. Correlation of SAS with PtGA was 83% for the derivation cohort and 76% for the validation cohort. Conclusions: SAS has shown a good test performance to distinguish active AOSD patients from the others. SAS may be a useful method for evaluating disease activity of AOSD patients in daily practice. Funding: None to declare. Declaration of Interest: None to declare. Ethical Approval: The present study was conducted in compliance with the Helsinki Declaration and was approved by the Local Ethics Committee of Hacettepe University (GO- 20/824). A written informed consent form was completed by all participants.

Compared to biological agents, little is known about the impact of sulfasalazine therapy on COVID-19 outcomes in patients with Axial Spondyloarthritis (AxSpA). Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the COVID-19 severity in AxSpAs receiving sulfasalazine and biologic-agent.A total of 219 SARS-CoV-2 positive AxSpA patients were retrospectively analyzed. COVID-19 pneumonia, hospitalization rate, and length of stay were used to determine COVID-19 severity. AxSpA patients were mainly grouped and compared as sulfasalazine and non-sulfasalazine. Afterward, we excluded no-treatment patients to reveal the drug's effects more clearly and regrouped AxSpA patients as sulfasalazine-monotherapy (34.3%), biologic-monotherapy (33.7%), and sulfasalazine + biologic (7.3%).Fifty-nine percent of the patients were male and the mean age was 45.0 years. Peripheral arthritis was 35% and uveitis 15%. In total, 41.5% of them have received sulfasalazine and 41.0% biologic agents, and the remaining patients with no AxSpA-specific treatment. In the first comparison, the sulfasalazine group had a higher age, more frequent COVID-19 pneumonia, hospitalization, and longer hospitalization than a non-sulfasalazine group. In the pairwise comparison of 3 treatment groups, the demographic and clinical features, the hospitalization rate and the length of hospital stay were similar but the sulfasalazine-monotherapy group had a higher frequency of COVID-19 pneumonia than the biologic-monotherapy group (23% vs. 7%,Our results imply sulfasalazine may be related to more severe COVID-19 in AxSpA patients. These patients should be followed more carefully in the presence of COVID-19, regardless of reasons such as age, comorbidity, and extra-axial disease, and consideration of discontinuing sulfasalazine maybe even thought.

Objectives The aim of this study is to investigate the outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in our cohort of Behçet’s disease (BD) patients and to reveal the rate of BD exacerbations due to COVID-19. Methods Patients who have been followed with a diagnosis of BD were retrospectively investigated for a positive severe acute respiratory syndrome–coronavirus 2 polymerized chain reaction (PCR) test. Data regarding demographics, clinical features and COVID-19 outcomes were collected from medical records for patients with a positive PCR. PCR-positive patients were reached via phone numbers, and ‘Behçet’s Disease Current Activity Form’ (BDCAF) scores for pre- and post-COVID-19 BD symptoms were calculated. Results Out of a total 648 BD patients, 59 were detected to have a positive PCR test. Three of the 59 patients (5.0%) were found to be hospitalized, none of them was admitted to the ICU or died. An increasing trend in the frequency of comorbid diseases and older age was observed in hospitalized patients. 32.2% of BD patients suffered from exacerbation of at least one symptom related to BD. Conclusions We observed no ICU admission or mortality with COVID-19 in our BD patient cohort. A substantial number of patients suffered from exacerbation of BD symptoms.

Our study aimed to evaluate clinical, functional, and prognostic features and to determine the prognosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung diseases, and interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features.Sixty-nine cases with interstitial lung diseases were recruited in this study prospectively. Demographic features, symptoms, radiological findings, functional measurements, and immunological markers were recorded twice (at the time of initial admission and in the 12th month). Twenty-four of 69 cases were idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, 32 were connective tissue diseaseassociated interstitial lung diseases, and 13 were interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features .Most of the patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis were male, while there were more female patients in connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung diseases and interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features groups. Female patients (65.0%) predominated in connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung diseases group (P.001). There was no significant difference in the mean ages of the disease groups, yet connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung diseases patients were generally younger (min- max: 34-82 years). In the idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis group, only low titers of antinuclear antibody positivity were found. Antinuclear antibody positivity in the connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung diseases group and interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features group was high (P = .001). The long-term survival of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung diseases, and interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features patients were 37%, 40 months (median) (95% CI, 5.193- 74.807), 48.6%, 80 months (median) (95% CI, 57.032-102.968), 30.8%, 46 months (median) (95% CI, 26.624-65.376), respectively.Although a consensus report describing interstitial lung diseases with autoimmune features has been published, diagnostic criteria for this group are still vague. Since the interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features group had the worst results in terms of functional loss and survival rates, the follow-up parameters and follow-up algorithm should be established for this group. Clinical and immunological evaluation of the interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features group should include detailed parameters because of follow-up and to estimate survival.

Background/aim: to evaluate treatment adherence and predictors of drug discontinuation among patients with inflammatory arthritis receiving bDMARDs within the first 100 days after the announcement of the COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and methods: a total of 1871 patients recorded in TReasure registry for whom advanced therapy was prescribed for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or spondyloarthritis (SpA) within the 3 months (6-9 months for rituximab) before the declaration of COVID-19 pandemic were evaluated, and 1394 (74.5%) responded to the phone survey. Patients' data regarding demographic, clinical characteristics and disease activity before the pandemic were recorded. The patients were inquired about the diagnosis of COVID-19, the rate of continuation on bDMARDs, the reasons for treatment discontinuation, if any, and the current general disease activity (visual analog scale, [VAS]). Results: a total of 1394 patients (493 RA [47.3% on anti-TNF] patients and 901 SpA [90.0% on anti-TNF] patients) were included in the study. Overall, 2.8% of the patients had symptoms suggesting COVID-19, and 2 (0.15%) patients had PCR-confirmed COVID-19. Overall, 18.1% of all patients (13.8% of the RA and 20.5% of the SpA; p = 0.003) discontinued their bDMARDs. In the SpA group, the patients who discontinued bDMARDs were younger (40 [21-73] vs. 44 years [20-79]; p = 0.005) and had higher general disease activity; however, no difference was relevant for RA patients. Conclusion: although the COVID-19 was quite uncommon in the first 100 days of the pandemic, nearly one-fifth of the patients discontinued bDMARDs within this period. The long-term effects of the pandemic should be monitored., Hacettepe Rheumatology Society

BACKGROUND: Many rheumatic diseases may cause gastrointestinal manifestations. The goal of this study was to analyze the prevalence and predictors of gastrointestinal involvement in patients with rheumatic disorders. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, and systemic sclerosis who have consulted due to gastrointestinal symptoms. The relationship between clinical symptoms, gastroscopic/colonoscopic findings, and histopathological results with current drugs and disease duration was evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 364 patients with rheumatic disorders and 740 people as control group were included in the study. Abdominal bloating followed by abdominal pain, regurgitation, and heartburn were reported as the main complaints by more than half of the patients. Most of the patients had gastric mucosal changes expressed as Lanza score, and the presence of major polypharmacy was the most important factor affecting Lanza score (odds ratio: 10, 95% CI: 1.882-54.111, P < .007) followed by disease duration (odds ratio: 1.559, 95% CI: 1.369-1.775, P < .001) and age (odds ratio: 1.069, 95% CI: 1.030-1.109, P < .001). In general, approximately 30% of the patients were positive for Helicobacter pylori infection and 35% showed intestinal metaplasia in histopathological examination. Most of the colonoscopic findings were associated with colonic polyps (n = 81). In multivariate analysis, disease duration was the only factor that affected the presence of colonic lesions (Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve (AUROC): 0.871, 95% CI: 0.824-0.918, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Patients with rheumatologic diseases frequently have gastrointestinal manifestations. The most encountered gastrointestinal symptom was abdominal bloating, followed by abdominal pain. Being aware of gastrointestinal manifestations and their determinants may help physicians manage and follow patients with rheumatologic disorders.

It has been suggested that the deterioration in the antioxidant defense system due to thiols may cause the pro-oxidant/antioxidant imbalance seen in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This study was conducted to evaluate thiol/disulfide (-SH/-SS) homeostasis in patients with RA compared to healthy controls, and to validate the limited number of studies examining the relationship between Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS28) and thiol parameters.A total of 100 individuals (mean age: 46.3 ± 12.03) consisting of 86 females and 14 males were included in the RA group, and a total of 100 individuals (mean age: 43.3 ± 10.96 years) consisting of 78 females and 22 males were included in the control group. DAS28 was used to assess RA disease activity. -SH/-SS homeostasis parameters were measured using the automated spectrophotometric method described by Erel and Neselioğlu.While native thiol (-SH) (p:0.001), total thiol (-SH + -SS) (p 0.0001) levels and -SH\(-SS + -SH) ratio (p: 0.018) were lower in the RA group compared to the healthy controls, disulfide (-SS) level (p: 0.005)), -SS\-SH (p: 0.001) and -SS\(-SS + -SH) (p: 0.002) ratios were found to be higher. In the control group and the group in remission (defined by DAS28 2.6), the median values of -SH (p:0.002) and -SS + -SH (p:0.0008) were found to be significantly higher, and the median value of -SS (p: 0.001) was found to be lower compared to the other DAS28 groups. While a negative correlation was found between DAS28 and -SH (r: -0.243, p: 0.007), a positive correlation was found between DAS28 and -SS (r: 0.316, p: 0.0003), -SS\-SH (r:0.229, p: 0.002) and -SS\(-SS + -SH) (r: 0.285, p: 0.0009).The plasma thiol antioxidant pool was decreased in RA compared to healthy controls and those with active disease compared to those in remission.

Background In this study, we aimed to compare the intensive care unit (ICU) admission rate of hospitalized mild/moderate COVID-19 patients treated with hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), favipiravir, and HCQ plus favipiravir. Methods Single center retrospective designed observational study conducted in Ankara City Hospital. Patients who were hospitalized between March 15, 2020 and June 1, 2020 in COVID-19 inpatient clinics with laboratory confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 were included in the study. An inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) for multiple treatment groups approach was used to balance the differences in several variables on admission. Results Among 2441 patients hospitalized with diagnosis of COVID-19 during the study period, 824 were eligible for the analysis. Median age of patients was 42 (18−93 years). Among all, 347 (43.2%) of the patients had mild disease, 470 (56.8%) had pneumonia. Propensity scores ranged from 0.1841 to 0.9381 in the HCQ group, from 0.03643 to 0.29885 in the favipiravir group, and from 0.03542 to 0.56184 in the HCQ plus favipiravir group. After IPTW for multiple treatment groups was applied, all the covariates in the planned propensity score had weighted standardized effect sizes below 10% which were ranged from 0.005 to 0.092. Multivariate analysis of treatment effect (adjusted effect of treatment) was indicated that there is no statistically significant difference between HCQ, favipiravir, and HCQ plus favipiravir treatment. After using combination of SMOTE and Bootstrap resampling approach, we found no statistically significant difference between HCQ and HCQ plus favipiravir groups in terms of ICU admission. However, compared with the HCQ group, ICU admission rate was statistically significantly higher in the favipiravir group. We obtained the similar results after the sensitivity analysis. Conclusions HCQ with or without favipiravir treatment is associated with reduced risk of ICU admission compared to favipiravir alone in mild to moderate COVID-19 adult patients.

Aim of this study is to investigate the course of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), in our cohort of familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) patients in means of mortality, admission to hospital and/or intensive care unit and length of hospital stay.A retrospective cohort was formed from patients who have previously been followed with a diagnosis of FMF. Patients of this cohort were retrospectively evaluated for a positive severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV 2) polymerized chain reaction (PCR) test result and information regarding hospitalisation, intensive care unit admission and mortality were collected from medical records.Out of a total 496 FMF patients, 34 were detected to have a positive SARS-CoV 2 PCR test. Eighty-five point three percent of these patients were under colchicine treatment and 17.6% were under interleukin (IL)—1 inhibitor treatment. Eight of the 34 patients (23.9%) were found to be hospitalized, one of them was admitted to the intensive care unit and died thereafter (2.9%). An increasing trend in the frequency of comorbid diseases (presence of at least one comorbidity 64.7% in all patients vs 75.0% in hospitalized patients) and IL-1 inhibitor usage (17.6% in all patients vs 50.0% in hospitalized patients) was observed in hospitalized patients.Rates of comorbid diseases and IL-1 inhibitor use for FMF were observed to be increased in FMF patients hospitalized for COVID-19.

To determine frequency of adverse events and attacks related to vaccination in recipients of CoronaVac and BNT162b2 in familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) patients, and to search whether history of prior COVID-19 or a booster dose increases occurrence of adverse events/attacks.FMF patients were surveyed for administration of any COVID-19 vaccine and vaccine-related adverse events or FMF attacks. Demographic, clinical, vaccine-related data, history of COVID-19 infection before or after vaccination, adherence to FMF treatment during vaccination were collected.A total of 161 vaccinated FMF patients were included. Ninety-three patients out of 161 had reported suffering from an adverse event/attack after a vaccine dose. There were 54.7% of BNT162b2 recipients who reported any adverse event after any vaccine dose in comparison to 29.9% of CoronaVac recipients (P .001). There were 22.2% of BNT162b2 recipients who reported suffering from a FMF attack within 1 month after vaccination in comparison to 19.4% of CoronaVac recipients (P = .653). When patients with or without adverse event/attack were compared, no significant differences were observed in means of demographics, comorbid diseases, disease duration, total vaccine doses, or treatments adhered to for FMF. Rates of adverse events/attacks were similar between patients with and without prior COVID-19. In booster recipients, adverse events/attacks were most frequent after the booster dose.A considerable number of FMF patients suffered from vaccine-related adverse events/attacks, particularly with BNT162b2. No serious events or mortalities due to vaccination were detected. Demographics, clinical characteristics and prior history of vaccination did not significantly affect these results. We observed an increased rate of adverse events/attacks with booster dose administration.

Objectives Familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) is the most common autoinflammatory disease, characterised by recurrent fever and serositis attacks lasting 1–3 days. Musculoskeletal involvement is the second most common manifestation in FMF patients. Sacroiliitis is another musculoskeletal involvement; as there is no spinal involvement, this is called FMF with sacroiliitis. This study was designed to investigate the clinical, demographic and genetic features of FMF in sacroiliitis patients and to compare them with axial SpA and FMF patients. Materials and Methods Forty-two FMF with sacroiliitis patients, 100 axial SpA patients and 100 FMF patients were recruited, and their demographic characteristics were recorded. Evidence of sacroiliitis was confirmed by sacroiliac joint MRI, and patients were examined for arthritis and enthesitis. MEFV gene mutations, HLA B27 positivity and ESR and CRP results were compared. Results In the FMF with sacroiliitis group, the M694V mutation was detected in 59.5% of patients. FMF with sacroiliitis patients were largely (83.3%) negative for HLA B27. The frequency of enthesitis was similar between FMF with sacroiliitis and axial SpA, and the frequency of arthritis was higher in axial SpA patients. Inflammatory markers (ESR and CRP) were statistically higher in FMF with sacroiliitis patients compared with axial SpA and FMF patients. Conclusion When all three groups were compared, the M694V mutation was more common, HLA B27 was largely negative and inflammatory markers were higher in the FMF with sacroiliitis group. FMF should be included in the differential diagnosis of sacroiliitis for managing treatment correctly and preventing complications.

Background Patients with rheumatological complaints may visit an emergency department (ED) because of an acute attack or complication. Because of the recent increased use of immunosuppressant drugs to treat rheumatic diseases, more patients with these conditions visit the ED with a complaint about an infection. However, there are little data on the ED visits of patients with rheumatological complaints. This study evaluated the ED visits of patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Materials and methods A total of 2715 patients (1753 females, 962 males) who had been diagnosed with an inflammatory rheumatic disease and followed up at the rheumatology clinic of Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara Ataturk Training and Research Hospital between April 2014 and April 2018 were included in the study. The demographic, clinical, and laboratory characteristics of the patients were obtained from the hospital patient records. The ED visits of these patients were classified into five triage groups (T1: critical, T2: very urgent, T3: urgent, T4: less urgent, T5: not urgent). Results Of the 2715 patients, 577 (21.3%) had visited the ED. The three most numerous groups who visited the ED were patients with rheumatoid arthritis (19.8%), ankylosing spondylitis (19.2%), and familial Mediterranean fever (15.9%). Of these 577 patients, 347 (60.1%) were discharged from the ED, 209 (36.2%) were hospitalized in the wards, and 21 (3.6%) were hospitalized in the intensive care unit (ICU). The 3 main reasons for visiting the ED were fever and malaise (n = 152, 26.3%), musculoskeletal complaints (n = 125, 21.7%), and abdominal pain (n = 89, 15.4%). The most numerous group of patients referred by the ED to the wards had vasculitis (n = 38, 17.9%), while the most numerous group of patients referred to the ICU had scleroderma (n = 7, 33.3%). Of the 21 patients who were referred by the ED to the ICU, 16 (76.1%) had respiratory system complaints. Of the 577 patients, 10 (1.7%) died. Eight of the 10 patients (80%) had a rheumatic disease and died after admission to the ICU. The other 2 patients had been diagnosed with pneumonia and myocardial infarction, respectively. Conclusions Our study found that visits to the ED by patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases were classified as urgent or less urgent. Patients with rheumatoid arthritis were the most numerous ED visitors. Vasculitis was the most common cause of hospitalization in the wards and scleroderma was the most common cause of hospitalization in the ICU and death. This suggests that ED physicians should be aware of these patients.

WOS: 000382747100004, PubMed ID: 27458846, Background/Aims: To establish the prevalence of the single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of endoplasmic reticulum aminopeptidase 1 (ERAP1), IL-23 receptor (IL-23R), signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT-3) and Janus kinase 2 (JAK-2) in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in a Turkish population. Materials and Methods: A total of 562 subjects who presented at the Ankara University internal medicine departments of rheumatology and gastroenterology outpatient clinics were recruited in this study, including 365 patients with AS, 197 patients with IBD and 230 healthy controls. ERAP1, IL-23R, STAT-3 and JAK-2) were genotyped in competitive allele-specific polymerase chain reactions. Results: The ERAP1 (rs26653) polymorphism was found to increase the disease risk in patients with AS and IBD compared with the control group (p=0.02 and p=0.01, respectively). In addition, this polymorphism revealed a significant relationship with the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) and the Bath AS Functional Index (BASFI) in patients with AS (r=0.829, p

This study aimed to compare Tuberculin Skin Test (TST) and QuantiFERON (R)-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) test in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and spondyloarthritis (SpA) patients scheduled for biological and targeted synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in a Bacillus Calmette-Guerin-vaccinated population. Adult RA (n = 206) and SpA (n = 392) patients from the TReasure database who had both TST and QFT-GIT prior to initiation of biological and targeted synthetic DMARDs were included in the study. Demographic and disease characteristics along with pre-biologic DMARD and steroid use were recorded. The distribution of TST and performance with respect to QFT-GIT were compared between RA and SpA groups. Pre-biologic conventional DMARD and steroid use was higher in the RA group. TST positivity rates were 44.2% in RA and 69.1% in SpA for a 5 mm cutoff (p < 0.001). Only 8.9% and 15% of the patients with RA and SpA, respectively, tested positive by QFT-GIT. The two tests poorly agreed in both groups at a TST cutoff of 5 mm and increasing the TST cutoff only slightly increased the agreement. Among age, sex, education and smoking status, pre-biologic steroid and conventional DMARD use, disease group, and QFT-GIT positivity, which were associated with a 5 mm or higher TST, only disease group (SpA) and QFT-GIT positivity remained significant in multiple logistic regression. TST positivity was more pronounced in SpA compared to that in RA and this was not explainable by pre-biologic DMARD and steroid use. The agreement of TST with QFT-GIT was poor in both groups. Using a 5 mm TST cutoff for both diseases could result in overestimating LTBI in SpA.

Objective The aim of this study is to evaluate semaphorin 3A levels in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) with and without renal involvement and secondary antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS). Methods Patients with SLE were grouped according to the presence of secondary APS or renal involvement. The control group consisted of age-matched, nonsmoking, healthy volunteers. Semaphorin 3A levels were compared among groups. All patients with SLE were regrouped according to the presence of thrombotic events, miscarriages, and proteinuria, and semaphorin 3A levels were investigated. Finally, semaphorin 3A levels of all patients with SLE as a single group were compared to those of the control patients. Results The mean semaphorin 3A values were 16.16 ± 2.84 ng/mL in the control group, 9.05 ± 5.65 ng/mL in patients with SLE without nephritis and APS, 11.28 ± 5.23 ng/mL in the SLE with APS group, and 8.53 ± 5.11 ng/mL in the lupus nephritis group. When all 3 patient groups were examined as a single group, the mean semaphorin 3A value was significantly lower than that of the control group. Semaphorin 3A was reduced in patients with SLE with thromboembolism and/or history of miscarriage. Conclusion Semaphorin 3A levels were lower in all patient groups compared to the control group. Moreover, the reduced semaphorin 3A levels in patients with a history of thromboembolism and/or miscarriage suggest that semaphorin 3A may play an important role in the pathogenesis of vasculopathy.

Studies regarding effectiveness of anakinra and tocilizumab treatments in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have contradictory results. Furthermore, there is scarce comparative data regarding superiority of any agent. To further elucidate any superiority between these two agents, we retrospectively investigated and compared outcomes in hospitalized COVID-19 patients of our inpatient cohort who received anakinra or tocilizumab.This study was designed as a single-center, retrospective, cross-sectional cohort study. Hospitalized patients with confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 who had Brescia-COVID respiratory severity scale score ≥3 and hyperinflammation (defined as elevation of C reactive protein ≥50 g/L or ferritin ≥700 ng/mL) and received anakinra or tocilizumab in addition to standard care were enrolled in the study. Length of hospital stay after initiation of antiinflammatory treatment, need for mechanical ventilation, need for intensive care unit admission, mortality were set as primary outcomes and compared between tocilizumab and anakinra recipients after propensity score matching.One hundred and six patients were placed in each group after propensity score matching. In the anakinra group, relative risk reduction for intensive care unit admission was 50% when compared to the tocilizumab group and the number needed to treat to avert an intensive care unit admission was 3 (95% CI, 2-5). In terms of mortality, a 52% relative risk reduction was observed with anakinra treatment and the number needed to treat to avert an intensive care unit admission was 8 (95% CI, 4-50). Significantly more patients were observed to receive glucocorticoids in the anakinra group.Anakinra administration in severe COVID-19 patients was significantly associated with better survival and greater clinical improvement compared to the tocilizumab administration in our study. Increased rate of glucocorticoid use in the anakinra group might have contributed to better outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: To analyse the clinical and laboratory factors associated with bamboo spine. METHODS: Data of patients fulfilling the 2009 ASAS classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis, registered in the national, multicentre, longitudinal, and observational database of TReasure was analysed. Radiographs were assessed using the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Radiologic Index (BASRI). Data of patients with a bamboo spine (Group 1) was compared to data derived from patients with a longstanding disease of at least 15 years but no syndesmophytes (Group 2). RESULTS: Out of the 5060 patients, 1246 had eligible radiographs. There were 111 patients (8.9%) with a bamboo spine. Male sex was more common among patients with bamboo spine. The median BMI of 27.7 (25.8-31.1) in Group1 was higher than the BMI of 25.9 (22.9-29.2) in Group 2 (p

Convalescent plasma (CP) might be an additional treatment modality in COVID-19. The aim of this study was to compare CP-related clinical characteristics and perinatal outcomes in pregnant women with mild or moderate-severe COVID-19.This prospective cohort study included 36 pregnant women (12 mild and 24 moderate-severe), who underwent CP therapy. The CP obtained from recently recovered donors was transfused to patients together with maximum supportive care and antiviral agents. The groups were then compared in respect of clinical characteristics, laboratory parameters, obstetric complications, and neonatal outcomes.Significant differences were determined between the groups in respect of systemic corticosteroids in COVID-19 treatment (41.7%, 87.5%, p = 0.004), oxygen (O2) support (0%, 91.7%, plt; 0.001), chest imaging (41.7%, 58.3%, p = 0.02), intensive care unit admission (0%, 20.8%, p = 0.03) and length of hospitalization (5.5 versus 9.5 days, plt; 0.001). The O2 saturation levels before and after administration of CP were significantly lower in the moderate-severe COVID-19 group (plt; 0.05). The O2 therapy time before and after administration of CP and total O2 therapy time were significantly lower in the mild COVID-19 group (plt; 0.05). Platelet, plateletcrit and lymphocyte counts were significantly higher in both the mild and moderate-severe COVID-19 groups after treatment compared to the pretreatment values (plt; 0.05).Although data on the results of CP treatment in pregnant women are somewhat limited, it has been suggested that early CP treatment may be associated with improvements in laboratory and ventilatory parameters in pregnant women with mild and moderate-severe COVID-19. Nevertheless, there is a need for further, randomized controlled studies on this subject with the inclusion of greater numbers of patients.