Search

ETV6::ABL1 rearranged neoplasms are rare hematological diseases. To date, about 80 cases have been reported, including myeloid and lymphoid leukemias. The ETV6 gene codes for an ETS family transcription factor and several fusion partners have been described. When translocated, ETV6 causes the constitutive activation of the partner genes. Here, we report the case of a 54-year-old woman with a cryptic insertion of the 3′ region of ABL1 in the ETV6 gene. The patient was first diagnosed with idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome, according to the clinical history, conventional cytogenetics, standard molecular analyses and pathologist description. Next generation sequencing of diagnosis samples unexpectedly detected both ETV6::ABL1 type A and B fusion transcripts, which were then confirmed by FISH. The diagnosis was Myeloid/Lymphoid neoplasm with ETV6::ABL1 fusion, and the patient received imatinib mesylate treatment. In a follow-up after more than one year, the patient still maintained the molecular and complete hematological responses. This case highlights the importance of timely and proper diagnostics and prompt tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In recent years, several studies investigated the complex process called "reprogramming" of seminoma (S) cells. The accepted pathogenetic model is a complex network including SOX2, SOX17, OCT3/4 and PRAME, which modulates the epigenetic transcription of numerous downstream genes and drives a divergent gene expression profile resulting in the transition from pure S (P-S) to S component (S-C) of mixed germ cell tumors of the testis (M-GCTT), and finally to embryonal carcinoma (EC). Herein, we tested a large cohort of GCTT with SOX2 and PRAME to evaluate their expression in the evolutionary steps of GCTT and verify if the modulation in the expression of these two molecules could be relevant for the fate of GCTT., Methods: We tested 43, 19 and 17 consecutive and retrospectively enrolled cases of GCTT, germ cell neoplasia in situ (GCNIS) and uninvolved background testes (UBT), respectively. SOX2 and PRAME expressions have been evaluated with H-score and compared by adopting the appropriate statistic tests (Student's t-test and Mann-Whitney U test)., Results: We found that SOX2 was more expressed by nonseminomatous-GCTT (NS-GCTT) (p < 0.001) and EC (p < 0.001) rather than S; by contrast, PRAME showed an opposite expression profile being expressed by S but not by NS-GCTT (p < 0.001) and EC (p < 0.001). S-C showed different expressions of SOX2 and PRAME compared to both P-S (p = 0.002 and <0.001, respectively) and EC (p < 0.001 and 0.042, respectively), with intermediate values between these latter two categories. GCNIS and UBT showed no expression of SOX2 (scattered positive Leydig cells) but high H-score levels of PRAME., Conclusions: SOX2 and PRAME are differentially expressed and specularly modulated during the "reprogramming" of S cells [P-S (high levels of PRAME, no expression/low levels of SOX2) → S-C (intermediate levels of PRAME, intermediate levels of SOX2) → EC (no expression/low levels of PRAME, high levels of SOX2)], therefore supporting a complex pathogenetic model where the interactions between these two molecules are crucial in determining the fate of GCTT., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest All the Authors present in this article declare NO CONFLICT OF INTERESTS., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier GmbH.)