Search

Background To reduce leprosy risk in contacts of patients with leprosy by around 50%, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends leprosy post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) using single-dose rifampicin (SDR). Results from a cluster randomized trial in the Comoros and Madagascar suggest that PEP with a double dose of rifampicin led to a similar reduction in incident leprosy, prompting the need for stronger PEP. The objective of this Phase 2 trial was to assess safety of a bedaquiline-enhanced PEP regimen (intervention arm, bedaquiline 800 mg with rifampicin 600 mg, BE-PEP), relative to the WHO recommended PEP with rifampicin 600 mg alone (control arm, SDR-PEP). Methods and findings From July 2022 to January 2023, consenting participants were screened for eligibility, including a heart rate-corrected QT interval (QTc) Conclusions In this study, we observed that safety of single-dose bedaquiline 800 mg in combination with rifampicin is comparable to rifampicin alone, although non-inferiority of QTc changes was demonstrated in children only after adjusting for the baseline QTc measurements. A Phase 3 cluster randomized efficacy trial is currently ongoing in the Comoros. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05406479., Author(s): Bouke Catherine de Jong 1,*, Said Nourdine 2, Auke Thomas Bergeman 3, Zahara Salim 2, Silahi Halifa Grillone 2, Sofie Marijke Braet 1, Mohamed Wirdane Abdou 2, Rian Snijders [...]

Some anti‐mycobacterial drugs are known to cause QT interval prolongation, potentially leading to life‐threatening ventricular arrhythmia. However, the highest leprosy and tuberculosis burden occurs in settings where electrocardiographic monitoring is challenging. The feasibility and accuracy of alternative strategies, such as the use of automated measurements or a mobile electrocardiogram (mECG) device, have not been evaluated in this context. As part of the phase II randomized controlled BE‐PEOPLE trial evaluating the safety of bedaquiline‐enhanced post‐exposure prophylaxis (bedaquiline and rifampicin, BE‐PEP, versus rifampicin, SDR‐PEP) for leprosy, all participants had corrected QT intervals (QTc) measured at baseline and on the day after receiving post‐exposure prophylaxis. The accuracy of mECG measurements as well as automated 12L‐ECG measurements was evaluated. In total, 635 mECGs from 323 participants were recorded, of which 616 (97%) were of sufficient quality for QTc measurement. Mean manually read QTc on 12L‐ECG and mECG were 394 ± 19 and 385 ± 18 ms, respectively (p < 0.001), with a strong correlation (r = 0.793). The mean absolute QTc difference between both modalities was 11 ± 10 ms. Mean manual and automated 12L‐ECG QTc were 394 ± 19 and 409 ± 19 ms, respectively (n = 636; p < 0.001), corresponding to moderate agreement (r = 0.655). The use of a mECG device for QT interval monitoring was feasible and yielded a median absolute QTc error of 8 ms. Automated QTc measurements were less accurate, yielding longer QTc intervals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Leprosy is an infectious neglected tropical disease, which can cause irreversible disabilities if not diagnosed in time. Colombia continues to show high rates of leprosy-related disability, mainly due to a delay in diagnosis. Limited knowledge is available that explains this delay, therefore our study aimed to explore the perceptions and experiences of leprosy health professionals with the delay in leprosy diagnosis in the Cesar and Valle del Cauca departments, Colombia. Nine semi-structured expert interviews with leprosy health professionals were conducted in May-June 2023 in Colombia. Thematic analysis was performed to analyse the interview results. Our analysis highlighted that the main reasons for delay at the health system-level included accessibility issues to obtain a diagnosis, lack of expertise by health staff, and barriers related to the organisation of the care pathway. Individual – and community-level factors included a lack of leprosy awareness among the general population and leprosy-related stigma. Diagnostic delay consists of a fluid interplay of various factors. Structural changes within the health system, such as organising integral leprosy care centres and highlighting leprosy in the medical curriculum, as well as awareness-related interventions among the general population, might help reducing diagnostic delays. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Patients with TB resistant to rifampicin (Rr-TB), and those with additional resistance to fluoroquinolones (pre-XDR-TB), should be treated with bedaquiline-pretomanid-linezolid-moxifloxacin and bedaquiline-pretomanid-linezolid, respectively. However, pretomanid is not yet widely available. Methods This is a pragmatic prospective single-arm study investigating the efficacy and safety of 9 mo of bedaquiline-delamanid-linezolid-clofazimine in patients with pre-XDR-TB or Rr-TB unresponsive to Rr-TB treatment in Nigeria. Results From January 2020 to June 2022, 14 of 20 patients (70%) successfully completed treatment, five died and one was lost-to-follow-up. No one experienced a treatment-emergent grade three/four event. Treatment success was higher compared with global pre-XDR-TB treatment outcomes. Conclusions While pretomanid is unavailable, highly resistant TB can be treated with bedaquiline-delamanid-linezolid-clofazimine. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Outcomes of retreatment for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (RR-TB) are rarely reported. We report 'definitive outcomes' after a cascade approach to RR-TB treatment. After a bacteriologically adverse outcome for the 9-months fluoroquinolone-based Short Treatment Regimen (STR), patients were retreated with a bedaquiline-based regimen (BDQ-regimen). Methods A Retrospective cohort study of RR-TB patients treated with the STR during 2012–2019 and retreated with a BDQ-regimen in case of failure or relapse was conducted. Definitive relapse-free cure took into account BDQ-regimen outcomes. Results Of 367 patients treated with the STR, 20 (5.4%) experienced failure or relapse. Out of these 20 patients, 14 started a BDQ-regimen, of whom none experienced failure or relapse. Definitive end of treatment outcomes of STR after revising with third-line BDQ-regimen outcomes, 84.7% (311/367) were cured relapse-free, 10.6% (39/367) died during treatment and 3.0% (11/367) were lost to follow-up during treatment with either the STR or BDQ-regimen. Six patients (1.6%; 6/367) with STR failure/relapse died before starting a BDQ-regimen. No patient had definitive treatment failure or relapse and remained without treatment. Conclusions If fluoroquinolone resistance is excluded or rare, it is beneficial to use fluoroquinolone as the core drug for a first RR-TB treatment regimen and to safeguard bedaquiline for those in need of retreatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Some anti-mycobacterial drugs are known to cause QT interval prolongation, potentially leading to life-threatening ventricular arrhythmia. However, the highest leprosy and tuberculosis burden occurs in settings where electrocardiographic monitoring is challenging. The feasibility and accuracy of alternative strategies, such as the use of automated measurements or a mobile electrocardiogram (mECG) device, have not been evaluated in this context. As part of the phase II randomized controlled BE-PEOPLE trial evaluating the safety of bedaquiline-enhanced post-exposure prophylaxis (bedaquiline and rifampicin, BE-PEP, versus rifampicin, SDR-PEP) for leprosy, all participants had corrected QT intervals (QTc) measured at baseline and on the day after receiving post-exposure prophylaxis. The accuracy of mECG measurements as well as automated 12L-ECG measurements was evaluated. In total, 635 mECGs from 323 participants were recorded, of which 616 (97%) were of sufficient quality for QTc measurement. Mean manually read QTc on 12L-ECG and mECG were 394 ± 19 and 385 ± 18 ms, respectively (p < 0.001), with a strong correlation (r = 0.793). The mean absolute QTc difference between both modalities was 11 ± 10 ms. Mean manual and automated 12L-ECG QTc were 394 ± 19 and 409 ± 19 ms, respectively (n = 636; p < 0.001), corresponding to moderate agreement (r = 0.655). The use of a mECG device for QT interval monitoring was feasible and yielded a median absolute QTc error of 8 ms. Automated QTc measurements were less accurate, yielding longer QTc intervals., (© 2024 The Author(s). Clinical and Translational Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

The short treatment regimen (STR) achieves a >80% cure in rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (RR-TB) patients. However, ototoxicity induced by the injectable is a concern. This is the first study to evaluate the replacement of injectables by linezolid in patients with audiometry abnormalities at baseline or during the treatment.We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all RR-TB patients started on the STR between 2016 and June, 2019, in Niger. Patients underwent audiometry every 2 months in 2016 and every month since 2017.Of 195 patients, 16.9% (33 out of 195) received linezolid from the start (n=17), or switched from injectables to linezolid during treatment (n=16), based on audiometry abnormalities. In 2016, two patients developed severe ototoxicity despite switching to linezolid. Since 2017, no patient developed severe hearing loss or complete deafness. Severe haematological toxicity was observed in 18.1% (six out of 33) of patients on linezolid, none of which was life threatening. The use of linezolid was associated with severe but manageable adverse events (hazard ratio 8.9, 95% CI 2.5-31.5; p=0.001). A total of 90.9% (30 out of 33) of patients on a linezolid-containing STR were cured, and none experienced treatment failure. Three died, but not due to adverse events.Baseline and monthly audiometry monitoring and using linezolid after detection of hearing abnormalities appears effective to prevent severe ototoxicity, while keeping high treatment success and manageable adverse events., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: M.B. Souleymane has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Piubello has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: I.M. Mamane-Lawan has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: S. Hassane-Harouna has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M.M. Assao-Neino has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Soumana has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: Z. Hamidou-Harouna has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Gagara-Issoufou has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: N. Ortuño-Gutiérez has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Roggi has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: V. Schwoebel has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: S. Mamadou has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: L. Lynen has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: B. De Jong has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Van Deun has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: T. Decroo has nothing to disclose., (Copyright ©ERS 2021.)