Search

The primary objective of this abstract is to define the growing trend of private equity (PE) backed consolidation of dermatology practices and explore its impact on patient care. The secondary objective is to better inform dermatologists of the acquisition process as well as how practices are valued in the event of a leveraged buyout. A systematic review was conducted using PRISMA guidelines using PubMed/MEDLINE and Web of Science in July 2021. Studies included were graded using the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine 2011 Levels of Evidence.1 A total of 18 articles met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. With the current environment of low interest rates combined with increasing cost of medical operations and non-clinical administrative burdens, PE is positioned to expand exponentially in total value through leveraged buyouts of solo and small dermatology groups.2 Selling dermatologists receive payment in form of upfront cash, and equity in escrow incentivizes them to continue the growth of their clinic so that it can be consolidated into a larger portfolio of practices to be sold to another buyer in 3-7 years at a far higher valuation. Within the fragmented $8.4 billion-dollar dermatology space, PE-backed practices represent approximately 10-15% of all private practices.3-5 Dermatologists should be aware of both the risks and the rewards of acquisition by PE given the fiduciary responsibility to shareholders and their patients. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(4): doi:10.36849/JDD.6892 Citation: Sung CT, Salem S, Oulee A, et al. A systematic review: Landscape of private equity in dermatology from past to present. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(4):404-408. doi:10.36849/JDD.6892.

Granulomas are complex cellular structures composed predominantly of macrophages and lymphocytes that function to contain and kill invading pathogens. Here, we investigated the single-cell phenotypes associated with antimicrobial responses in human leprosy granulomas by applying single-cell and spatial sequencing to leprosy biopsy specimens. We focused on reversal reactions (RRs), a dynamic process whereby some patients with disseminated lepromatous leprosy (L-lep) transition toward self-limiting tuberculoid leprosy (T-lep), mounting effective antimicrobial responses. We identified a set of genes encoding proteins involved in antimicrobial responses that are differentially expressed in RR versus L-lep lesions and regulated by interferon-γ and interleukin-1β. By integrating the spatial coordinates of the key cell types and antimicrobial gene expression in RR and T-lep lesions, we constructed a map revealing the organized architecture of granulomas depicting compositional and functional layers by which macrophages, T cells, keratinocytes and fibroblasts can each contribute to the antimicrobial response.

Langerhans cells (LCs) reside in the epidermis where they are poised to mount an antimicrobial response against microbial pathogens invading from the outside environment. To elucidate potential pathways by which LCs contribute to host defense, we mined published LC transcriptomes deposited in GEO and the scientific literature for genes that participate in antimicrobial responses. Overall, we identified 31 genes in LCs that encode proteins that contribute to antimicrobial activity, ten of which were cross-validated in at least two separate experiments. Seven of these ten antimicrobial genes encode chemokines, CCL1, CCL17, CCL19, CCL2, CCL22, CXCL14 and CXCL2, which mediate both antimicrobial and inflammatory responses. Of these, CCL22 was detected in seven of nine transcriptomes and by PCR in cultured LCs. Overall, the antimicrobial genes identified in LCs encode proteins with broad antibacterial activity, including against Staphylococcus aureus, which is the leading cause of skin infections. Thus, this study illustrates that LCs, consistent with their anatomical location, are programmed to mount an antimicrobial response against invading pathogens in skin.

Sarcoidosis is a systemic inflammatory disorder characterized by the formation of non‐caseating granulomas. Cutaneous involvement of sarcoidosis is common and has a wide variety of clinical presentations. Herein, we present a case of cutaneous sarcoidosis mimicking pigmented purpuric dermatosis (PPD) in a 26‐year‐old female treated with topical tofacitinib cream and a literature review of all other reported cases of cutaneous sarcoidosis with PPD‐like features. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents the discussion on recent trials of JAK inhibitors tested in patients with Atopic dermatitis (AD). Topics include pathogenesis of AD being multifactorial involving genetics, epidermal barrier dysfunction, and immune dysregulation; and JAK-STAT signaling pathway playing a pivotal role in the immune system dysregulation and exaggeration of TH2 cell response.

Trends in phototherapy utilization including its main clinical indications were last characterized by Luersen et al. for the time period of 1997–2010. In this study, we update data on the use of phototherapy in the United States from 2015 to 2018. We queried the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) data on the number of phototherapy visits as well as demographics and associated dermatoses. There were approximately 1.31 million outpatient phototherapy visits during the study period with a decreasing trend over time. Leading indications for phototherapy were dermatitis not otherwise specified (NOS), (25.7%) followed by atopic dermatitis (AD) (11.7%), and pruritus (9.7%). There is a downtrend in the use of phototherapy from 2015 to 2018. Psoriasis is no longer the main indication for phototherapy, which may be due to the advent of highly effective novel biologics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Phototherapy has gained popularity in the recent decades for the treatment of various immune-mediated dermatological conditions since it is more-cost effective and less toxic compared to systemic therapies. This systematic review aims to inform dermatology providers of the risks and benefits of phototherapy, especially in patients at risk for malignancies. Ionizing energy from phototherapy results in DNA photolesions, namely of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) and 6-4 photoproducts (6-4PPs). Without adequate repair, these mutations increase the risk for carcinogenesis. Additionally, phototherapy can also indirectly cause DNA damage through the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which damage of several structural and functional proteins and DNA. When choosing a phototherapy modality, it also important to take into consideration the side effect profiles associated with each modality. For instance, a 10-fold higher dose of NB-UVB is required to produce a similar amount of CPDs compared with BB-UVB. Patients who undergo UVA with psoralen (PUVA) can be susceptible to developing skin malignancies up to 25 years after receiving their last treatment. It would behoove providers to consider optimal radiation dosage given each patients' level of skin pigmentation and potential for photoadaptation. Additionally, there are measures have been proposed to minimize deleterious skin changes, such as a 42-degree Celsius heat treatment using a 308nm excimer laser prior to UVB phototherapy and low frequency, low intensity electromagnetic fields along with UVB. However, as performing routine skin exams, remain paramount in the prevention of phototherapy-induced neoplasia., Competing Interests: DISCLOSURES: The authors report no conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this article., (Copyright © 2023. Matrix Medical Communications. All rights reserved.)

Rosacea is a chronic skin disorder involving central facial erythema secondary to vascular instability and cutaneous inflammation. Rosacea is divided into different subtypes based on the morphology of the rash — erythematotelangiectatic, papulopustular, phymatous, and ocular rosacea. A less-known subtype called neurogenic rosacea has been proposed to categorize patients suffering from rosacea with erythematous flushing and burning sensation that is refractory to traditional treatment. There is minimal data on this subgroup of rosacea patients and its potential treatment options. This review aims to explore current medical literature to define characteristics of neurogenic rosacea and its management. We performed a systematic search of PubMed database and identified 6 articles meeting inclusion criteria with a total of 37 patients with suspected neurogenic rosacea. Combination treatments with topicals (eg, metronidazole, brimonidine), as well as oral medications including vascular (eg, beta blockers), psychiatric (eg, diazepam, duloxetine), neurologic (eg, pregabalin, sumatriptan), and antibiotic agents (eg, rifaximin), were often cited to have better outcomes, but this finding was highly variable between patients. There were isolated reports of effective management with onabotulinumtoxinA intradermal injections and endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy treatment. Current literature supports selecting agents aimed at treating the major symptom pattern (eg, erythema, telangiectasias, burning sensation). Neurogenic rosacea treatment: a literature review. Ivanic MG, Oulee A, Norden A, et al. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(6):566-571. doi:10.36849/JDD.7181 &nbsp.

Disease control for moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD) has been primarily achieved with phototherapy and non-specific immunomodulators, cyclosporine, and methotrexate. These treatments have, however, been associated with many unfavorable side effects.