The therapeutic perspectives of flomoxef, SCE 2787, cefpirome, cefepime, latamoxef, cefotaxime and of piperacillin plus tazobactam were comparatively evaluated by theirin vitro activity against 1119 clinical isolates of 83 bacterial species.Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp.Enterobacter sakazakii, Proteus spp. andShigella spp. were about equally susceptible to the cephalosporins (MIC90: 0.06 to 0.5 mg/l), while the MIC90 for piperacillin plus tazobactam was between 2 and 16 mg/l.Enterobacter cloacae, Enterobacter aerogenes andSerratia spp. were most susceptible to SCE 2787, cefpirome and cefepime (MIC90: 0.06 to 2 mg/l) followed by latamoxef, cefotaxime, flomoxef and piperacillin plus tazobactam. ForCitrobacter spp.,Providencia spp. andYersinia enterocolitica MIC90 were between 0.06 and 0.5 mg/l. Flomoxef was between 2 to 4 log2 less active against these species but more active than piperacillin plus tazobactam (MIC90: 2 and 8 mg/l).Morganella morganii andHafnia alvei were most susceptible to cefepime, cefpirome and latamoxef (MIC90: 0.13 to 0.5 mg/l) while cefotaxime (MIC90: 8 mg/l) and piperacillin plus tazobactam (MIC90: 8 and > 64 mg/l) were the least active compounds. SCE 2787, cefepime and cefpirome were the most potent beta-lactams against the majority of the 13 species of non-fermentative bacilli (NFB) investigated (MIC90: 0.5 to 16 mg/l). The oxacephems were the least active compounds against NFB. Cefepime was the most active of the compounds included againstPseudomonas aeruginosa (MIC90: 16 mg/l).Haemophilus spp.,Neisseria gonorrhoeae andBordetella pertussis were most susceptible to cefotaxime (MIC90: 0.03 to 0.06 mg/l). Latamoxef had the lowest activity of all compounds against gram-positive cocci. Flomoxef was the most active compound against penicillinase producingStaphylococcus aureus and about equally active as the other betalactams against methicillin susceptible staphylococci of other staphylococcal species. Non-enterococcal streptococci had MIC90 between 0.03 und 0.5 mg/l for all.Streptococcus pneumoniae with MICs for penicillin equal to or above 1 mg/l were between 16 and 64 times less susceptible (MIC90: between 0.5 and 4 mg/l) than penicillin-susceptible organisms (MIC90: between 0.03 and 0.13 mg/l). Flomoxef and piperacillin plus tazobactam were the most active of the compounds against anaerobic organisms. The oxacephem flomoxef was the most stable of the compounds included against novel extended broad spectrum beta-lactamases (TEM-3 to TEM-7, SHV-2 to SHV 5, CMY-1, CTX-M-1) followed by latamoxef. However, both oxacephamycins are hydrolysed by cephamycinases while SCE 2787, cefepime and cefpirome are stable against cephamycinases. Progress in antibacterial activity of parenteral cephalosporins was achieved both by structural modifications (of latamoxef or cefotaxime) and combination of piperacillin with taxobactam. Flomoxef in comparison with latamoxef extended its spectrum to include staphylococci and increased activity against non-enterococcal streptococci 16 to 32 times. The various structural modifications of cefotaxime at position 3 of the cephalosporin ring improved the antibacterial profile of SCE 2787, cefepime and cefpirome in very much the same way (enhanced activity mainly against organisms producing chromosomal cephalosporinases, e. g.Enterobacter spp.,Serratia spp.,H. alvei, M. morganii and non-fermentative bacilli). Tazobactam protects piperacillin against plasmidic beta-lactamases, however, this was achieved to an even higher extent by the structural modifications of aminothiazole-methoximino cephalosporins (SCE 2787, cefepime and cefpirome) and in particular of flomoxef.