Search

Abstract Background The BioFire® FilmArray® Blood Culture Identification Panel 1 (BF-FA-BCIP) detects microorganisms with high accuracy in positive blood cultures (BC) – a key step in the management of patients with suspected bacteraemia. We aimed to compare the time to optimal antimicrobial therapy (OAT) for the BF-FA-BCIP vs. standard culture-based identification. Methods In this retrospective single-centre study with a before-after design, 386 positive BC cases with identification by BF-FA-BCIP were compared to 414 controls with culture-based identification. The primary endpoint was the time from BC sampling to OAT. Secondary endpoints were time to effective therapy, length of stay, (re-)admission to ICU, in-hospital and 30-day mortality. Outcomes were assessed using Cox proportional hazard models and logistic regressions. Results Baseline characteristics of included adult inpatients were comparable. Main sources of bacteraemia were urinary tract and intra-abdominal infection (19.2% vs. 22.0% and 16.8% vs. 15.7%, for cases and controls, respectively). Median (95%CI) time to OAT was 25.5 (21.0–31.2) hours with BF-FA-BCIP compared to 45.7 (37.7–51.4) hours with culture-based identification. We observed no significant difference for secondary outcomes. Conclusions Rapid microorganism identification by BF-FA-BCIP was associated with a median 20-h earlier initiation of OAT in patients with positive BC. No impact on length of stay and mortality was noted. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04156633, registered on November 5, 2019.

Background: The BioFire® FilmArray® Blood Culture Identification Panel 1 (BF-FA-BCIP) detects microorganisms with high accuracy in positive blood cultures (BC) – a key step in the management of patients with suspected bacteraemia. We aimed to compare the time to optimal antimicrobial therapy (OAT) for the BF-FA-BCIP vs. standard culture-based identification. Methods: In this retrospective single-centre study with a before-after design, 386 positive BC cases with identification by BF-FA-BCIP were compared to 414 controls with culture-based identification. The primary endpoint was the time from BC sampling to OAT. Secondary endpoints were time to effective therapy, length of stay, (re-)admission to ICU, in-hospital and 30-day mortality. Outcomes were assessed using Cox proportional hazard models and logistic regressions. Results: Baseline characteristics of included adult inpatients were comparable. Main sources of bacteraemia were urinary tract and intra-abdominal infection (19.2% vs. 22.0% and 16.8% vs. 15.7%, for cases and controls, respectively). Median (95%CI) time to OAT was 25.5 (21.0–31.2) hours with BF-FA-BCIP compared to 45.7 (37.7–51.4) hours with culture-based identification. We observed no significant difference for secondary outcomes. Conclusions: Rapid microorganism identification by BF-FA-BCIP was associated with a median 20-h earlier initiation of OAT in patients with positive BC. No impact on length of stay and mortality was noted. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04156633, registered on November 5, 2019. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Central nervous system (CNS) infection in pediatrics is a considerable cause of morbidity and fatality. Objective: The aim of the current study was to evaluate the Allplex™ Meningitis Panel Assays (ME) as a rapid diagnostic method for CNS infections. Methods: The study included 329 cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples from pediatric patients with suspected CNS infections. The samples were analyzed using the Allplex™ ME panel in the period between January 2020 and January 2022. Result: Out of the 329 CSF samples, 21 (6.4%) cases were positive. The commonest viral pathogen detected was parvo B19 (n=11), followed by human herpes virus 7 (n=3) and human herpes virus 6 (n=2). Streptococcus pneumoniae (n=1) was the only bacterial pathogen detected in our cohort. One patient with parvo B19 encephalitis improved markedly after receiving methylprednisolone. Another patient with parvo B19 was diagnosed consequently as anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor encephalitis. Conclusion: The Allplex™ ME Panel test can rapidly detect 18 pathogens from CSF. In view of antibiotics misuse, ME Panel aids in diagnosis of CNS infection helping the clinicians in early management and shortening the length of hospital stay. Case by case clinical evaluation is mandatory to avoid unnecessary request of the ME panel test. Further testing - specially for CSF autoantibodies- is warranted in case of worsening or unsatisfactory improvement of the condition. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Parasite (1252607X) is the property of EDP Sciences and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Parasite (1252607X) is the property of EDP Sciences and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Commercial multiplex PCR assay panels were developed to overcome the limitations of microscopic examination for parasitological diagnosis on stool samples. However, given the increased supply of this diagnostic approach, these assays must be evaluated to position them in a diagnostic algorithm. Analytical performances of the multiplex PCR assay G-DiaParaTrio, Allplex® GI parasite and RIDA®GENE parasitic stool panel for detecting Blastocystis sp., Entamoeba histolytica, Giardia duodenalis, Cryptosporidium spp., Dientamoeba fragilis, and Cyclospora cayetanensis, were assessed through a retrospective comparative study on 184 stool samples initially sent for parasitological investigation. The composite reference method for parasitological diagnosis was microscopic observation and Entamoeba histolytica-specific adhesion detection when necessary. Multiplex PCR assays were performed on extracted DNA from each stool, following the manufacturer’s recommendations. Discrepant results with the composite reference method were investigated with species-specific PCR to approach a final parasitological diagnosis. Overall sensitivity/specificity for the multiplex PCR assays was 93.2%/100% for G-DiaParaTrio, 96.5%/98.3% for Allplex® GI parasite and 89.6%/98.3% for RIDA®GENE, whereas the composite reference method presented an overall sensitivity/specificity of 59.6%/99.8%. These results confirmed the added diagnostic value of the multiplex PCR approach for gastrointestinal protists. Nevertheless, the PCR procedure and the analytical performance for each protist of interest, variable depending on the multiplex PCR assay, must be considered when implementing a PCR-based diagnostic approach.