Search

Objective: To explore the expression status of CMTM 4 and PD-L1 protein in pancreatic cancer tissues and analyzed the relationship between the clinician and clinicopathological features. Methods: From January 2016 to 2020.1, our Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University collected 40 cases as the experimental group, and selected adjacent tissues as the control group, to detect the expression of CMTM 4 and PD-L1 protein by immunohistochemistry Envision, the expression of CMTM 4 and PD-L1 protein in cancer tissues and adjacent tissues, and the relationship between the two and clinical pathological features. Results: CMTM 4 is mainly distributed in tumor cell membrane and cytoplasm, both brown or brown particles; PD-L1 is mainly distributed in tumor stromal immune cells, cell membrane and cytoplasm, brown or light yellow. The levels of CMTM 4 and PD-L1 in pancreatic cancer were higher than those in adjacent cancer (P<0.05). Compared with adjacent tissues, pancreatic cancer tissues had high expression of CMTM 4 protein and PD-L1 protein, and low expression of CMTM 4 protein and PD-L1 protein was lower than adjacent tissues(P<0.05). The incidence of nerve invasion with high PD-L1 expression and lymph node metastasis was higher than that of CMTM 4 and PD-L1 expression (P<0.05); however, gender, age, tumor site, tumor diameter, tissue differentiation, TNM stage, high CMTM 4 expression and high PD-L1 protein expression and low CMTM 4 protein and low PD-L1 expression (P>0.05). CMTM 4 protein and PD-L1 protein expression were not correlated with the degree of tissue differentiation or TNM stage of pancreatic cancer(P>0.05). Conclusion: CMTM4 and PD-L1 proteins are highly expressed in pancreatic cancer tissues, which are related to nerve invasion and lymph node metastasis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background The global Phase III IMpower132 study evaluating atezolizumab plus pemetrexed and carboplatin or cisplatin (APP) versus pemetrexed plus carboplatin or cisplatin (PP) for first‐line treatment of non‐squamous advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) met its co‐primary progression‐free survival (PFS) endpoint at the primary analysis in the intention‐to‐treat (ITT) population. Although the co‐primary overall survival (OS) endpoint was not met, numerical OS improvement favoring APP over PP was observed at the final analysis. We report primary results for Chinese patients in IMpower132. Methods Treatment‐naive Chinese patients with non‐squamous stage IV EGFR/ALK mutation‐negative NSCLC were randomized 1:1 to receive 4 or 6 cycles of APP or PP, followed by maintenance atezolizumab plus pemetrexed or pemetrexed. Co‐primary endpoints were investigator‐assessed PFS and OS. Results The ITT population included 163 Chinese patients (82 in the APP arm and 81 in the PP arm). At data cutoff (median follow‐up, 11.7 months), the median PFS in the APP and PP arms was 8.3 and 5.8 months, respectively; the unstratified hazard ratio (HR) was 0.73 (95% CI: 0.50, 1.08). At the interim OS analysis, median OS was not estimable in either arm; the unstratified HR was 0.70 (95% CI: 0.40, 1.24). No new safety signals were observed. Conclusion Among Chinese patients in IMpower132, PFS benefit was seen with APP versus PP. Though interim OS data were immature, there was a trend toward OS benefit favoring APP versus PP. The safety profile of the APP was consistent with the known risks of the individual treatment components. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02657434.

Background: The global Phase III IMpower132 study evaluating atezolizumab plus pemetrexed and carboplatin or cisplatin (APP) versus pemetrexed plus carboplatin or cisplatin (PP) for first‐line treatment of non‐squamous advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) met its co‐primary progression‐free survival (PFS) endpoint at the primary analysis in the intention‐to‐treat (ITT) population. Although the co‐primary overall survival (OS) endpoint was not met, numerical OS improvement favoring APP over PP was observed at the final analysis. We report primary results for Chinese patients in IMpower132. Methods: Treatment‐naive Chinese patients with non‐squamous stage IV EGFR/ALK mutation‐negative NSCLC were randomized 1:1 to receive 4 or 6 cycles of APP or PP, followed by maintenance atezolizumab plus pemetrexed or pemetrexed. Co‐primary endpoints were investigator‐assessed PFS and OS. Results: The ITT population included 163 Chinese patients (82 in the APP arm and 81 in the PP arm). At data cutoff (median follow‐up, 11.7 months), the median PFS in the APP and PP arms was 8.3 and 5.8 months, respectively; the unstratified hazard ratio (HR) was 0.73 (95% CI: 0.50, 1.08). At the interim OS analysis, median OS was not estimable in either arm; the unstratified HR was 0.70 (95% CI: 0.40, 1.24). No new safety signals were observed. Conclusion: Among Chinese patients in IMpower132, PFS benefit was seen with APP versus PP. Though interim OS data were immature, there was a trend toward OS benefit favoring APP versus PP. The safety profile of the APP was consistent with the known risks of the individual treatment components. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02657434. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The global phase 3 IMpower010 study evaluated adjuvant atezolizumab versus best supportive care (BSC) following platinum‐based chemotherapy in patients with resected stage IB–IIIA non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we report a subgroup analysis in patients enrolled in Japan. Eligible patients had complete resection of histologically or cytologically confirmed stage IB (tumors ≥4 cm)–IIIA NSCLC. Upon completing 1–4 cycles of adjuvant cisplatin‐based chemotherapy, patients were randomized 1:1 to receive atezolizumab (fixed dose of 1200 mg every 21 days; 16 cycles or 1 year) or BSC. The primary endpoint of the global IMpower010 study was investigator‐assessed disease‐free survival, tested hierarchically first in patients with stage II–IIIA NSCLC whose tumors expressed programmed death‐ligand 1 (PD‐L1) on ≥1% of tumor cells, then in all randomized patients with stage II–IIIA NSCLC, and finally in the intention‐to‐treat (ITT) population (stage IB–IIIA NSCLC). Safety was evaluated in all patients who received atezolizumab or BSC. The study comprised 149 enrolled patients in three populations: ITT (n = 117; atezolizumab, n = 59; BSC, n = 58), all‐randomized stage II–IIIA (n = 113; atezolizumab, n = 56; BSC, n = 57), and PD‐L1 tumor cells ≥1% stage II–IIIA (n = 74; atezolizumab, n = 41; BSC, n = 33). At the data cutoff date (January 21, 2021), a trend toward disease‐free survival improvement with atezolizumab vs BSC was observed in the PD‐L1 tumor cells ≥1% stage II–IIIA (unstratified hazard ratio [HR], 0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.25–1.08), all‐randomized stage II–IIIA (unstratified HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.35–1.11), and ITT (unstratified HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.34–1.10) populations. Atezolizumab‐related grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 16% of patients; no treatment‐related grade 5 events occurred. Adjuvant atezolizumab showed disease‐free survival improvement and a tolerable toxicity profile in Japanese patients in IMpower010, consistent with the global study results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background The expression of Kelch-like protein 18 (KLHL18) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is lower than that in normal lung tissue according to the Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis database. KLHL18 is a BTB domain protein and binds cullin 3 (CUL3). However, whether this complex participates in ubiquitination-mediated protein degradation in NSCLC is unclear. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the role of KLHL18 in human NSCLC cells. Results We found that KLHL18 is downregulated in cancer cells and is associated with poor prognosis. Further, its expression was significantly associated with tumor node metastasis (TNM) stage, lymph node metastasis, and tumor size. In vitro analysis of NSCLC cells showed that overexpressing KLHL18 inhibited cell proliferation, migration, and invasion. We found that the tumor-inhibitory effect of the KLHL18 protein was achieved by promoting the ubiquitination and degradation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) p85α and inhibiting the expression of PD-L1 protein, ultimately preventing tumor cell immune escape. Conclusions Our results identified the tumor-suppressive mechanism of KLHL18 and suggested that it is closely related to NSCLC occurrence and development. Further investigation of the underlying mechanism may provide new targets for NSCLC treatment.

This prespecified subanalysis of the global, randomized controlled phase III KEYNOTE‐024 study of pembrolizumab vs chemotherapy in previously untreated metastatic non‐small‐cell lung cancer without EGFR/ALK alterations and a programmed death‐ligand 1 (PD‐L1) tumor proportion score of 50% or greater evaluated clinical outcomes among patients enrolled in Japan. Treatment consisted of pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks (35 cycles) or platinum‐based chemotherapy (four to six cycles). The primary end‐point was progression‐free survival; secondary end‐points included overall survival and safety. Of 305 patients randomized in KEYNOTE‐024 overall, 40 patients were enrolled in Japan (all received treatment: pembrolizumab, n = 21; chemotherapy, n = 19). The hazard ratio (HR) for progression‐free survival by independent central review (data cut‐off date, 10 July 2017) was 0.25 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.10‐0.64; one‐sided, nominal P =.001). The HR for overall survival (data cut‐off date, 15 February 2019) was 0.39 (95% CI, 0.17‐0.91; one‐sided, nominal P =.012). Treatment‐related adverse events occurred in 21/21 (100%) pembrolizumab‐treated and 18/19 (95%) chemotherapy‐treated patients; eight patients (38%) and nine patients (47%), respectively, had grade 3‐5 events. Immune‐mediated adverse events and infusion reactions occurred in 11 patients (52%) and four patients (21%), respectively; four patients (19%) and one patient (5%), respectively, had grade 3‐5 events. Consistent with results from KEYNOTE‐024 overall, first‐line pembrolizumab improved progression‐free survival and overall survival vs chemotherapy with manageable safety among Japanese patients with metastatic non‐small‐cell lung cancer without EGFR/ALK alterations and a PD‐L1 tumor proportion score of 50% or greater. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02142738. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To evaluate the prevalence and prognostic role of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and tumor mutational burden (TMB) in patients with non-immunotherapy-treated advanced cervical cancer., Methods: Clinical data were retrospectively collected from medical records between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2016, at Asan Medical Center (Korea); archived tumor samples were assessed for PD-L1 expression (combined positive score [CPS] ≥1) and TMB (≥175 mutations/exome). Overall survival (OS) was defined as time from advanced diagnosis or initiation of first-line or second-line systemic therapy until death/last follow-up. The association of OS with PD-L1 expression and TMB were analyzed using the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for covariates., Results: Of 267 patients, 76.0% had squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), 24.0% had adenocarcinoma (AC)/adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC), 64.4% had PD-L1 CPS ≥1, and 32.6% had TMB ≥175 mutations/exome. PD-L1 CPS ≥1 and TMB ≥175 mutations/exome were more prevalent in SCC than in AC/ASC (73.9% and 37.2% vs. 34.4% and 17.7%). There was no association between OS and PD-L1 expression (CPS ≥1 vs. <1: adjusted hazard ratio [HR]=1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.84-1.53 from advanced diagnosis); OS trended shorter for the subgroup with TMB ≥175 versus <175 mutations/exome (adjusted HR=1.29; 95% CI=0.95-1.75)., Conclusion: Retrospective analysis of non-immunotherapy-treated patients with advanced cervical cancer demonstrated a higher prevalence of PD-L1 CPS ≥1 and TMB ≥175 mutations/exome in SCC versus AC/ASC. PD-L1 CPS ≥1 was not associated with OS; TMB ≥175 mutations/exome showed a trend toward shorter OS. Additional studies are needed to confirm these findings., Competing Interests: J-YP and M-HB have nothing to disclose. LC, CS, and PJ are employees of Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA, and own stock in Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA. CT and XYJ are employees of Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA. RC is an employee of Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA, owns stock in Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA, and has two pending patents (Angiogenesis and mMDSC gene expression-based biomarker of tumor response to PD-1 antagonists; patent WO 2020/167619). SI is an employee of MSD Korea (employment [JCAP asso RDMA]), registered pharmacist (Korea), and stockholder of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA., (© 2024. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology, and Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology.)

Introduction: Bronchogenic tumors, predominantly non-small cell type (NSCLC), are a global health concern, with adenocarcinomas, their most common subtype, being most often diagnosed at advanced stages, making it essential to develop effective therapeutic strategies, especially for patients with NSCLC who do not express the PD-L1 (Programmed Death-Ligand 1) protein. Two pivotal studies, Keynote-189(1) and Keynote-407,(2) presented their combined results in 2023, after a 5-year follow-up,(3) concluding that the combination of Pembrolizumab and chemotherapy demonstrated substantial improvements in overall survival (OS) compared to chemotherapy alone. These results represent a significant advancement in the therapies for PD-L1-negative NSCLC, offering a new therapeutic perspective for this group of patients without compromising treatment tolerability. This article analyzes and synthesizes the data from these studies, highlighting its importance and clinical potential of this combined approach in the management of NSCLC. Objective: To evaluate the potential of oncologic therapy with Pembrolizumab in patients with PD-L1-negative NSCLC. Methods: This is a descriptive study through the critical analysis of works that correlated the different perspectives of oncologic therapies for lung cancer, relating to PD-L1-negative NSCLC, written in the English language. Results: The two fundamental studies, KEYNOTE-189 and KEYNOTE-407 divulged in 2023 their combined results for PD-L1 negative patients. In the Gadgeel et al. study, of 442 patients with a mean follow-up of 60.7 months, the 255 patients who received pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy achieved a survival rate of 12.5%, compared to 9.3% among 187 patients undergoing chemotherapy alone. Keynote-189 results were similar, being observed in the study, which included 616 patients with non-squamous NSCLC, over 5 years of follow-up, utilizing pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy, resulting in a median OS increase of 11% compared to the Control Group. Additionally, the Keynote-407 study, which included 559 patients with a mean follow-up time of 56.9 months for pembrolizumab plus pemetrexed-platinum, indicated a marked improvement in progression-free survival (PFS), with rates of 10.8% versus 3.5% for the placebo, and survival rates for the first group was also longer, with a 18.4% rate compared to the placebo group 9.7% (Table 1). Conclusion: According to the analysis of the presented results, it is evident that Pembrolizumab represents a promising and effective therapy for patients with PD-L1 negative NSCLC. The Keynote-189 and Keynote-407 studies consistently highlighted improvements in overall survivorship and progression-free survival with the use of Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy, as opposed to chemotherapy alone. These outcomes offer a new therapeutic perspective for a group of patients who previously had limited treatment options, representing a significant advancement in the management of these patients, with real potential to positively impact clinical practice and improve outcomes for patients with PD-L1 negative NSCLC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pembrolizumab plus pemetrexed‐platinum significantly improved overall survival (OS) and progression‐free survival (PFS) with manageable safety compared with placebo plus pemetrexed‐platinum in patients with previously untreated metastatic nonsquamous non–small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without EGFR/ALK alterations in the global, randomized, double‐blind, phase 3 KEYNOTE‐189 study. We present results of Japanese patients enrolled in the KEYNOTE‐189 global and Japan extension studies. Patients were randomized 2:1 to intravenous pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo every 3 weeks (Q3W) for up to 35 cycles. All patients received pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 plus the investigator's choice of cisplatin or carboplatin Q3W for four cycles, followed by maintenance pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 Q3W (all intravenous). Co–primary endpoints were OS and PFS. Forty Japanese patients enrolled (pembrolizumab, n = 25; placebo, n = 15). At data cutoff (20 May 2019; median time from randomization to data cutoff, 18.5 [range, 14.7‒38.2] months), the median OS was not reached in the pembrolizumab plus pemetrexed‐platinum arm; the median OS was 25.9 (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.9‒29.0) months in the placebo plus pemetrexed‐platinum arm (hazard ratio [HR].29; 95% CI,.07‒1.15). The median (95% CI) PFS was 16.5 (8.8‒21.1) compared with 7.1 (4.7‒21.4) months (HR,.62; 95% CI,.27‒1.42), respectively. There were no grade 5 adverse events (AE). Grade 3/4 AE occurred in 72% vs 60% of patients in the pembrolizumab vs placebo arms; 40% vs 20% had immune‐mediated AE, and 4% vs 0% had infusion reactions. Efficacy and safety outcomes were similar to those from the global study and support first‐line therapy with pembrolizumab plus pemetrexed‐platinum in Japanese patients with nonsquamous NSCLC without EGFR/ALK alterations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Although there have been several studies on concordance of different assays testing programmed cell death ligand‐1 (PD‐L1) expression using surgical specimens, studies using real‐world biopsy specimens are scarce. However, many of the non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases requiring immunotherapy and thus PD‐L1 testing are unresectable having to rely on small biopsy results. Therefore, we sought to assess the concordance of two diagnostic assays (22C3 and SP263) in evaluating PD‐L1 expression using specimens from CT‐guided transthoracic needle biopsy (TNB) specimens in a routine clinical setting. Methods A total of 202 NSCLC cases that underwent CT‐guided TNB from April 2017 to February 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Biopsy specimens tested with both 22C3 and SP263 assays were included. Concordance of PD‐L1 expression levels determined by two assays was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient, and the agreement of dichotomized values at various cutoffs (1%, 25%, and 50%) were assessed using Cohen's κ coefficient of agreement. Results A total of 80 patients (M:F = 47:33, mean age: 68.0 years) were included in the study. Concordance of PD‐L1 expression levels was high (intraclass coefficient: 0.892) between 22C3 and SP263 assays. Agreements at cutoff levels of 1%, 25%, and 50% were also good, with κ values of 0.878, 0.698, and 0.790, respectively. Positive percent agreement was 93.2%, 100.0%, and 95.2% for agreements at 1%, 25%, and 50%. Conclusion There is a high concordance of PD‐L1 expression evaluated with 22C3 and SP263 assays using CT‐guided TNB specimens.

This prespecified subanalysis of the global, randomized controlled phase III KEYNOTE‐024 study of pembrolizumab vs chemotherapy in previously untreated metastatic non‐small‐cell lung cancer without EGFR/ALK alterations and a programmed death ligand 1 (PD‐L1) tumor proportion score of 50% or higher evaluated clinical outcomes among patients enrolled in Japan. Treatment consisted of pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks (35 cycles) or platinum‐based chemotherapy (four to six cycles). The primary end‐point was progression‐free survival; secondary end‐points included overall survival and safety. Of 305 patients randomized in KEYNOTE‐024 overall, 40 patients were enrolled in Japan (all received treatment: pembrolizumab, n = 21; chemotherapy, n = 19). Median progression‐free survival was 41.4 (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.2‐42.5) months with pembrolizumab and 4.1 (95% CI, 2.8‐8.3) months with chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 0.27 [95% CI, 0.11‐0.65]; one‐sided, nominal P =.001). Median overall survival was not reached (NR) (95% CI, 22.9‒NR) and 21.5 (95% CI, 5.2‐35.0) months, respectively (HR, 0.39 [95% CI, 0.17‐0.91]; one‐sided, nominal P =.012). Treatment‐related adverse events occurred in 21/21 (100%) pembrolizumab‐treated and 18/19 (95%) chemotherapy‐treated patients; eight patients (38%) and nine patients (47%), respectively, had grade 3‐5 events. Immune‐mediated adverse events and infusion reactions occurred in 11 pembrolizumab‐treated patients (52%) and four chemotherapy‐treated patients (21%), respectively; four patients (19%) and one patient (5%), respectively, had grade 3‐5 events. Consistent with results from KEYNOTE‐024 overall, first‐line pembrolizumab improved progression‐free survival and overall survival vs chemotherapy with manageable safety among Japanese patients with metastatic non‐small‐cell lung cancer without EGFR/ALK alterations and a PD‐L1 tumor proportion score of 50% or higher. The trial is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02142738. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Although there have been several studies on concordance of different assays testing programmed cell death ligand‐1 (PD‐L1) expression using surgical specimens, studies using real‐world biopsy specimens are scarce. However, many of the non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases requiring immunotherapy and thus PD‐L1 testing are unresectable having to rely on small biopsy results. Therefore, we sought to assess the concordance of two diagnostic assays (22C3 and SP263) in evaluating PD‐L1 expression using specimens from CT‐guided transthoracic needle biopsy (TNB) specimens in a routine clinical setting. Methods: A total of 202 NSCLC cases that underwent CT‐guided TNB from April 2017 to February 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Biopsy specimens tested with both 22C3 and SP263 assays were included. Concordance of PD‐L1 expression levels determined by two assays was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient, and the agreement of dichotomized values at various cutoffs (1%, 25%, and 50%) were assessed using Cohen's κ coefficient of agreement. Results: A total of 80 patients (M:F = 47:33, mean age: 68.0 years) were included in the study. Concordance of PD‐L1 expression levels was high (intraclass coefficient: 0.892) between 22C3 and SP263 assays. Agreements at cutoff levels of 1%, 25%, and 50% were also good, with κ values of 0.878, 0.698, and 0.790, respectively. Positive percent agreement was 93.2%, 100.0%, and 95.2% for agreements at 1%, 25%, and 50%. Conclusion: There is a high concordance of PD‐L1 expression evaluated with 22C3 and SP263 assays using CT‐guided TNB specimens. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Programmed death-1 (PD-1) and its ligand are part of the immune checkpoint pathway that down-regulates effector T cells in immune response, thereby causing immune suppression. The PD-1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) pathway can be blocked by antibodies to reverse tumor-mediated immunosuppression. However, advanced cancers such as stage III-IV ovarian cancer (OC) and certain types such as ID8 OC (a clone of C57BL/6 mouse OC) may hijack the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway to escape immune attack. When combined with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, or other agents, these PD-1/PD-L1 pathway blockages can produce a synergistic antitumor response in OC. Combined immunotherapy significantly prolongs overall survival by changing the tumor microenvironment through processes such as increasing the number of CD4+ or CD8+ T cells or cytokines in mice with OC and decreasing the number of regulatory T cells (Tregs) and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs). OC patients treated with combined immunotherapy received better prognoses than those treated with monotherapy. This review reflects the move toward novel therapy combinations for OC and discusses these promising immunotherapeutic approaches, which are more cost-effective and effective than other approaches. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]